[MOA2-WP:27] Re: MOA2-William Henry Jackson diaries

Merrilee Proffitt (mproffit@library.berkeley.edu)
Tue, 9 Jun 1998 09:56:05 -0700 (PDT)

My initial response to this is that if the typescript is what is being
transcribed, rather than the diary, then the typescript is what should be
imaged. Although there is an interesting fieldnotes -> typescript ->
electronic transcript relationship here, I think this is beyond what we
can do in the testbed.

Merrilee

On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, atroncale wrote:

>
> MOAII participants:
>
> A question has arisen regarding the emphasis that should be placed on
> the representation of the physical object within the framework of the
> MOAII White Paper. NYPL's William Henry Jackson diaries exist in both
> their original form as field notes, and in typescript form, which was
> also produced by Jackson at a later date.
>
> The typescript is far easier to read (the field notes are in pencil
> and Jackson's handwriting is difficult to read at best) and is, upon
> inspection, transcribed almost verbatim from the original field notes.
>
> If full text retrieval is warranted, the question as to whether images
> of the original field notes or the typescript should be represented in
> image form has come up. References to the intended Digital Object
> Model seem to place an emphasis on navigation within the text based on
> methods and relevant behaviors. Thus, since the typescript will be
> rekeyed, we are wondering if the scans of the diaries are necessary
> for the intended purposes of the project. Is physical representation
> an issue here or are we mostly concerned with methodology?
>
> Anthony Troncale
> Associate Head, Digital Unit
> Preservation Division
> New York Public Library
> (212) 930-0821
> atroncale@nypl.org
>