I. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ASSOCIATION (FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS) (10-299)

MATERIAL ON U.S. SUPREME COURT

Lecture: Hon. William O. Douglas, Meiklejohn Lecture, Brown U., Providence, R.I., May 3, 1963.

Special Section on Justice Felix Frankfurter: 76 Harvard 1-24, by Dean Acheson, Lord Evershed, Paul A. Freud, Erwin N. Griswold, John M. Harlan, Archibald MacLeish, Reinhold Niebuhr.

Law review articles:

Charles A. Reich, Mr. Justice Black and the living Constitution, 76 Harvard 673-754.

Norman Dorsen, Sen. Eastland's attack on the U.S. Supreme Court: An analysis and response, 111 U. Pa. 693-707.

M. P. Golding, Principled decision-making and the Supreme Court, 63 Columbia 35-58.

Martin Shapiro, Judicial modesty: Down with the old! Up with the new? 10 UCLA 533-560.

Charles Fried, Two concepts of interests: Some reflections on the Supreme Court's balancing test, 76 Harvard 755-78.

Daniel J. Meador, Justice Black and his law clerks, 15 U. Alabama 57-63.

Yosal Rogat, Mr. Justice Holmes: A dissenting opinion, 15 Stanford 254-308.

Joel B. Grossman, Role-playing and the analysis of judicial behavior: The case of Mr. Justice Frankfurter, 11 Journal of Pub. Law 285-309.

Samuel Krislov, The amicus curiae brief: From friendship to advocacy, 72 Yale 694-721.

Henry J. Merry, Scope of the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction: Historical basis, 47 U. Minnesota 53-69.

Arthur Selwyn Miller, The changing role of the United States Supreme Court, 25 Modern L.Q. 641-53.

Alpheus Thomas Mason, Myth and reality in Supreme Court decisions, 48 U. Virginia 1385-1406.

Archibald Cox, The Supreme Court and the federal system, 50 U. California 800-20.

GENERAL CONSTITUTIONAL MATERIAL

Law review articles:

Thomas I. Emerson, Toward a general theory of the First Amendment, 72 Yale 877-956.

Wallace Mendelson, On the meaning of the First Amendment: Absolutes in the balance, 50 U. California 821-28.

Robert E. Brown, Reinterpretation of the formation of the American Constitution, 42 Boston 412-74.

Norman Redlich, Are there 'certain rights . . . retained by the people'? 37 New York U. 787-812.

Jefferson B. Fordham, The states in the federal system: Vital role or limbo? 49 U. Virginia 666-76.

Charles E. Clark, A plea for the unprincipled decision, 49 U. Virginia 660-65.

Charles L. Black, Jr., The proposed amendment of Article V: A threatened disaster, 72 Yale 877-956.

Stuart S. Nagel, Political parties and judicial review in American history, 11 Journal of Pub. Law 328-40.

Comment:

Counterrevolution in state constitutional law, 15 Stanford 309-30.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PRESS, ASSEMBLY (0-99) See also Association (200-299)
Law review articles: Milton Conover, Free speech and the common good, 46 Marquette 79-93.

Robert A. Leflar, The free-ness of free speech, 15 Vanderbilt 1073-1084.

10. Licensing

11. Of Meetings (see also 201)

11.3a.

ACLU of S. Calif. v. Los Angeles and San Diego Bds. of Educ. (Calif. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 1, 69. Cite: 379 P. 2d 4.

11.15.

Fields v. City of Fairfield, Ala. (U.S.S.C., #566.) (143 So. 2nd 177.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 69. March 18, 1963: U.S.S.C. noted prob. juris. Cite: 372 U.S. 940.

12. Of Motion Pictures (see also 52)

13. Of Peddlers

14. Of Books, Magazines (see also 52)
Comment:

Non-criminal obscenity regulation and freedom of expression, 1962 Washington U. 476-514.

- 92 -

14.10.

Haiman and Grove Press, Inc. v. Morris. (Ill. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 2, 69. Ill. Sup. Ct. granted Pls. petition for rehearing. Pending.

14.10a.

Grove Press, Inc. and Henry Miller v. Morris. (ND Ill., E. Div., #61 C 1784.)*

14.11.

Grove Press, Inc. v. Calissi, Bergen Co. Pros. (DC N.J., #900-61.)*

14.12.

Zeitlin v. Arneborgh. (Calif. Dist. Ct. of App., #26592.)*

14.13.

Florida ex rel. Gerstein v. Grove Press, Inc. (3d Dist. Ct. of App., Fla.)*

14.14.

Ronsley v. Stanczak. (Lake Co. Cir. Ct., Ill., #62-179.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 69. May 1963: Def.-State's atty. admitted error; entered into stipulation against conduct complained of; Pl's. request for injunction pending.

15. Of Miscellaneous Activities

20. Administrative Restrictions

21. By U. S. Customs

22. By U. S. Postmaster

22.14.

Manual Enterprises v. Day. (370 U.S. 478.) Facts: VII DOCKET 101. Case notes: 27 Albany 127-131; 17 Rutgers 213-218; 31 Fordham 570-577; 16 Vand. 251-257; 24 U. Montana 65-71.

23. On Government Information and Secrecy

24. On Students and Professors (see also 223, 262, 281 and 342)
Law review articles:

William W. Van Alstyne, Political speakers at state universities: Some constitutional considerations, 111 U. Pa. 328-42.

William W. Van Alstyne, Procedural due process and state university students, 10 UCLA 368-89.

Comment: Expulsion of college and professional students: Rights and remedies, 38 Notre Dame 174-87.

24.13.

Lessin v. Regents, U. of Calif., Chancellor Spieth — Riverside Campus (Calif. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 2. April 1963: Pls. dismissed suit, on indication that policy may be changed by Def-Regents.

24.20.

Koch v. Bd. of Trustees, U. of Ill. (Ill. Sup. Ct.). Facts: VIII DOCKET 3. Ill Sup. Ct. denied leave to appeal. Pending.

24.21.

Egan v. Moore, Trs. of State Univ. of State of New York. (Albany Sup. Ct., #324-63.)*

24.25.

Byrd v. Gary. (ED S.C.)*

24.26.

Ritter v. Matthews, Trs. (N. Texas State U.) (ED Tex., Sherman Div., #9238.)*

25. On Miscellaneous Activities

25.10.

Smith v. Cremins. (SD Cal.)*

30. Economic Restrictions (see also 251, 261, 268, 281)
Comment: Federal employment and the First Amendment, 1962 Washington U. 432-42.

Case note: Application of the Hatch Act to political activities of a state official: Palmer v. U.S. Civil Service Commission (297 F.2d 450, CA 7 1962) 61 U. Michigan 592-96.

30.1.

Independent Productions Corp. and I.P.C. Distributors, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc. et al. (SD NY, Civ. #110-304.)*

30.3.

Comm. to Secure Justice for Morton Sobell v. Tavern-on-the-Green Restaurant and City Parks Commr. Morris. (SD N.Y.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 4. 1963: Def.-owner settled; case closed.

30.5.

Wagner v. Post Office. (U.S. Post Office.)*

30.6.

Eustace v. Day, Postmaster General and U.S. Civil Service Comm. (CA DC.)*

30.7.

Young v. Motion Picture Assn. of America, Inc. (DC DC.)*

30.8.

Ciepley v. Intl. Assn. of Machinists. (CA 7.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 4. Correction: no appeal taken from dismissal by DC.

30.13.

Turn Toward Peace v. Al Molaikan Temple. (Los Angeles Muni. Ct., #908264.)*

30.14.

Fort v. Co. of Alameda. (California) (Dist. Ct. of App. 1st Dist., Div. 1, #2168.) June 19, 1962: Pl-psychiatrist employed by Co. fired for political activity for heading speaker's bureau for gubernatorial candidate, under §41 of Co. Charter. Super. Ct. overturned dismissal, held §41 unconstitutional since "so broad in scope . . . and vague as to make it impossible for persons who come within its provisions to ascertain what conduct they may engage in without fear of punishment." Appeal by Def-Co. pending. Albert Bendich, Esq., 2920 Fulton St., Berkeley, Calif.

40. Contempt
Law review article: Ronald Goldfarb, The Constitution and contempt of court, 61 U. Michigan 283-350.

41. Of Federal Courts
Law review article: Janet Mary Riley, Constitutional limitations on federal contempt proceedings, 11 Loyola 49-70.

42. Of State Courts
Case note: Propriety of holding grand jury in contempt of court: Clemmons v. State (141 So.2d 749, Fla. App. 1962): 17 U. Miami 110-13; 48 U. Iowa 725-31.

42.11.

Louisiana v. Defs. (19th Jud. Dist., E. Baton Rouge Parish.)*

41.12.

Re Dawley and Holt. (Cir. Ct., Hopewell, Va.)*

42.13.

Re Selby and Taylor. (Pa. Sup. Ct.) 1963: Def-executives of Philadelphia Evening Bulletin cited for contempt for refusal to turn over to special grand jury recordings of conversations between reporter and person being investigated. April 10, 1963: Fined $1000 each, 5 days. Appeal to Pa. Sup. Ct. pending.

42.14.

Johnson v. Virginia. (U.S.S.C., #715.) Pet.-Negro sat in Traffic Ct. section reserved for whites, refused to move when requested by bailiff and order by Ct.; Pet. did not- 93 - behave in boisterous or abusive manner; no disorder in Ct. room. Convicted of contempt. Hustings Ct. convicted in trial de novo; Va. Sup. Ct. of App. refused to grant writ of error because judgment was "plainly right". Apr. 29, 1963: U.S.S.C., per curiam, reversed: arrest and conviction based "entirely" on refusal to comply with segregated seating requirements; ". . . it is no longer open to question that a State may not constitutionally require segregation of public facilities . . . State-compelled segregation in a court of justice is a manifest violation of the State's duty to deny no one the equal protection of its laws."

42.15.

George v. Clemmons. (U.S.S.C., #975.) Nov. 29, 1962: Pet.-Negro woman sat in "white" section of courtroom while attending trial of CORE leaders; held in contempt for refusal to sit in "colored" section; $100, 10 days. La. Sup. Ct. affirmed. May 13, 1963: U.S.S.C. granted cert., reversed per curiam, citing Johnson v. Virginia, 42.14.

43. Of Other Agencies (see also 270s, 330s)

50. Criminal Sanctions

51. Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses (see also 55, 541, 542, 551, 552)

51.8.

Storey v. Davis. (Cook Co. Super. Ct., #60 S 9228.)*

51.19.

South Carolina v. Carras, Stradley. (Sumter Muni. Ct.)*

51.25.

Louisiana v. Rev. Cox. (La. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 5. Decision awaited.

51.26.

Louisiana v. 300 Defs. (New Orleans Dist. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 5. 1962: 3 Defs. convicted, $25 fine; charges against other 297 Defs. dismissed. And see 51.25, 54.2, 54.3, 54.4.

51.27.

South Carolina v. Randolph. (Sumter.) (Sumter Co. Cir. Ct.)*

51.34.

Georgia v. Forman. (Albany.)*

51.35.

Georgia v. Patch. (Albany.)*

51.36.

Georgia v. Rev. Anderson. (Albany Recorder's Ct.)*

51.37.

Mississippi v. Block. (Greenwood.) (Co. Ct.)*

52. Against Obscenity (see also 12, 14)
Law review articles:

Charles W. Froessel, Law and obscenity, 27 Albany 1-10.

Louis Henkin, Morals and the Constitution: The sin of obscenity, 63 Columbia 391-414.

Arlen Specter, William B. Ball, Dr. Philip Q. Roche, and Julian E. Goldberg, Censorship and obscenity: A panel discussion, 66 Dickinson 421-41.

John S. Harrington, The evolution of obscenity control statutes, 3 William and Mary 302-10.

Comments:

Constitutional obscenity: The Supreme Court's interpretation, 12 De Paul 103-15.

Book censorship in Massachusetts: The search for a test for obscenity, 52 Boston U. 476-91.

52.20.

U.S. v. Frew. (ED Mich., #37517.)*

52.22.

Massachusetts v. Spiegel. (Cambridge Dist. Ct.)*

52.31.

Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan. (U.S.S.C., #118.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 5, 71. Cite: 372 U.S. 58.

52.33.

California v. Aday. (Dist. Ct. of App.)*

52.34.

New York v. Mishkin. (App. Div., N.Y. Sup. Ct., #5238.) 1960: Def.-bookseller convicted of selling obscene books, violating law requiring imprint of name of publisher on books published in N.Y. Nov. 27, 1962: App. Dept. affirmed conviction for selling obscene books, reversed conviction for failure to "imprint", finding statute unconstitutional; opinion per curiam, cited Talley, 362 U.S. 60. Emanuel Redfield, Esq., 60 Wall St., NYC.

52.37.

Gerstein v. "Pleasure Was My Business". (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6, 71. Petition for cert. Pending.

52.40.

Massachusetts v. Interstate News Dealers Supply Co. (Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct.)*

52.42.

California v. Shaver. (San Mateo Super. Ct., App. Dept.)*

52.44.

California v. Bradley Smith. (U.S.S.C. #812.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6. 1962: Calif. Sup. Ct. aff'd. April 29, 1963: U.S.S.C. granted cert. Pending.

52.46.

Maryland v. Yudkin. (Md. Ct. of App.) (182 A.2d 798.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6, 71. Jan. 1963: On remand, state nolle prossed charges. Case note: 12 Cath. U. 53-55.

52.47.

U.S. v. Wilmot Enterprises. (DC N.H., ##6584, 6601.)*

52.48.

Connecticut v. Huntington. (Conn. Sup. Ct. of Errors.)*

52.49.

California v. McGilvery. (San Diego Muni. Ct., #M-11466.)*

52.51.

McCauley v. "Tropic of Cancer". (Wis. Sup. Ct., #122.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6, 71. 1963: Wis. Sup. Ct. reversed, held book not obscene. Pls. motion for rehearing pending.

52.52.

City of Seattle v. Johnson. (King Co. Super. Ct., #36388.)*

52.53.

Whitney v. San Francisco Municipal Court. (Calif. Sup. Ct., SF #21120.)*

52.54.

South Carolina v. Ravenell. (Gen. Sess. Ct., Dorchester Co.) 1962: Def.-Negro college student convicted under state obscenity statute after he telephoned white woman for date. Sentence: 3 yrs. on road gang. May 15, 1963: Def. released on parole. Conrad Lynn, Esq., 401 Broadway, NYC.

52.55.

Chicago v. Russell, Compton. (Cook Co. Cir. Ct.) 1963: Defs.-actors arrested after they read portions of Tropic of Cancer during show; charge: obscenity. Pending until decision in Haiman, 14.10. Elmer Gertz, Esq., 120 S. LaSalle, Chicago, Ill.

52.56.

U.S. v. Ginzburg. (ED Pa., #21367 Crim.) May, 1963: Def. indicted for allegedly sending obscene literature("Eros" magazine) through mails. Plea: not guilty. Pending. David I. Shapiro and Sidney Dickstein, Esqs., 20 E. 46th St., NYC; Norman A. Oshtry, Esq., 20 S. 15th St., Philadelphia; Murray Powlen, Esq., amicus for PCLU, 1405 Locust St., Philadelphia.

- 94 -

52.57.

Chicago v. Bruce. (Chicago Muni. Ct.) Dec. 5, 1962: Def.-entertainer arrested during night club performance; charge: obscenity. March 14, 1963: Def. convicted; sentence; 1 year in jail, $1,000 fine. Def. tried in absentia. Appeal pending.

53. Against Defamation (see also 61)

53.4.

Louisiana v. Moore. (19th Jud. Dist., E. Baton Rouge Parish.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6. 1963: Motions for new trial pending. Defs. have not been sentenced.

53.5.

Louisiana v. Cox. (19th Jud. Dist., E. Baton Rouge.) 1962: Def. charged with: (1) defaming a judge, (2) defaming a district attorney. Convicted. Def's. appeal pending. Nils R. Douglas, Esq., 2211 Dryades St., New Orleans.

54. Against Sedition, Criminal Anarchy (see also 241-44)

54.2.

Louisiana v. Goldfinch. (New Orleans.) (Orleans Parish Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7. Nov. 1960: Def. moved to quash indictment; pending.

54.3.

Louisiana v. Diamond. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7, 71. May 27, 1963: U.S.S.C. granted Def's. petition for cert.

54.4.

Louisiana v. Moore and Rougeau. (19th Jud. Dist. Ct., E. baton Rouge Parish.)*

54.5.

Louisiana v. Zellner and McDew. (19th Jud. Dist. Ct., E. Baton Rouge Parish, #42916.)*

55. Against Picketing and Demonstrating (see also 51, 123, 541, 542, 551, 552)
(Some cases involving picketing charges are reported under the subject matter of the protest for which the picketing was conducted, e.g., against discrimination in dining places, 552.)

55.7.

Tennessee v. Defs. (Madison Co. Ct.)*

55.16.

Alabama v. Rev. Shuttlesworth, Rev. Phifer. (Birmingham Crim. Ct.)*

55.18.

Alabama v. Dr. McNair. (Talladega.) (Cir. Ct.)* And see Alabama v. Gray, 63.2.

55.19.

Louisiana v. Moore. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7.* Collins, Douglas & Elie, Esqs., 2211 Dryades St.; Smith and Waltzer, Eqs., 1006 Baronne Bldg., all of New Orleans.

55.21.

California v. Peterson. (Calif. Sup. Ct.)*

55.24.

Scott v. District of Columbia. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7, 71. June 17, 1963: U.S.S.C. denied cert.

55.25.

Jackson v. Allen. (Co. Ct., 1st Jud. Dist., Hinds Co., Miss., #21.)*

55.26.

North Carolina v. Frinks. (Chowan Co. Super. Ct.)*

55.28.

Illinois v. Tranquilli, Thomas, J. Lewis, Bridges. (Cairo.) (Justice of Peace Ct., Alexander Co. Ct.)*

55.29.

City of Cairo v. 12 Defs. (Cairo Muni. Ct., # #20420-20423.)*

55.31.

Missouri v. Lewis, Dunlap, Adams, Kundra. (Charleston Muni. Ct., # #8-36-233, 8-60-257, 8-52-249, 8-53-250, 8-55-252.)*

55.32.

Crawford, Mitchell, Poole, Salter v. Mississippi. (CA 5.)*

55.33.

California v. Brown, Poland, Cook. (Marin Co. Muni. Ct.) May 2, 1963: 13 students arrested at gates of San Quentin prison during demonstration against scheduled multiple executions. Charge: refusal to disperse on command of police officer. 8 Defs. pleaded guilty, 6 mths. probation; 2 convicted after jury trial, same sentence; 3 others not charged. Benjamin Dreyfus, Esq., 540 Fremont Bldg., San Francisco; Hadden W. Roth, Esq., San Rafael, Calif.

56. Against "Corrupt Practices"

56.3.

Int'l. Assn. of Machinists v. Street. (367 U.S. 740.) Facts: VI DOCKET 104. Case notes: 10 U.C.L.A. 390-401; 22 U. Maryland 348-56.

56.4.

Alabama v. Mills. (Ala. Sup. Ct.) Nov. 6, 1962: Def.-editor of Birmingham Post-Herald published election-day editorial urging passage of ballot measure to change city government from commission to mayor-council. Nov. 13, 1962: Def. arrested, charge: violation of "Corrupt Practices Act", Title 17, §285, Ala. Code. Dec. 26, 1962: Co. Court sustained demurrer to complaint on grounds of unconstitutionality under First Amendment. Act purports to punish vote solicitation or electioneering. Appeal by state to Ala. Sup. Ct. pending.

57. Against Vagrancy

57.3.

Louisiana v. Trumpower. (E. Baton Rouge Crim. Dist. Ct.)*

57.4.

Georgia v. Sherrod and Allen. (Dawson.)*

57.5.

Mississippi v. Rev. A. Jones. (Jackson.) (Hinds Co. Ct.)*

57.7.

Alabama v. Zellner. (Montgomery.) (15th Jud. Cir., Ala., #948.)*

57.8.

Zellner v. Thetford, Smith, Riggs, Lingo. (MD Ala.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 72. May 1963: Pl. dismissed suit.

58. Against Trespassing (see also 541, 542, 551, 552)

58.1.

California v. Poland and Cage. (U.S.S.C., #995 Misc.)*

58.2.

Delaware v. Anderson, Livingston. (Kent Co. Ct. of Com. Pleas.)*

58.3.

Alabama v. Zellner. (Intermediate Ct., #3599.)* And see 55.18, 63.2.

- 95 -

58.4.

Maryland v. Grubb. (Cambridge.)*

58.6.

Alabama v. Student Defs. (Huntsville.) (Ala. Ct. of App.)*

59. Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities
See cases at 123.

59.22.

North Carolina v. Crowder, Covington, Lowry, Reape, Mallory. (Union Co. Super. Ct.) (372 U.S. 949.)*

59.22b.

North Carolina v. R. Covington and Rorie. (Union Co. Super. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 9. Covington conviction reversed on appeal. Re-trial pending. Rorie conviction sustained; Def. serving sentence.

59.26.

Mississippi v. Bevel. (Jackson.) (Hinds Co. Ct.)*

59.27.

Mississippi v. Aaron Henry. (Clarksdale.) (Cir. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 9. 1962: Cir. Ct. reversed conviction, remanded. Pending.

59.27a.

Mississippi v. Aaron Henry. (Miss. Sup. Ct.) Jan. 1963: Def. arrested; charge: disorderly conduct involving obscene language and improper advances to white youth; convicted in co. ct.; Cir. Ct. affirmed; appeal to Miss. Sup. Ct. pending.

59.28.

Kentucky v. Pfuhl and Duffey. (Louisville City Ct.)*

60. Civil Sanctions

61. Against Defamation
Law review articles:

Herbert W. Titus, Statement of fact versus statement of opinion—A spurious dispute in fair comment, 15 Vanderbilt 1203-46.

Walter Probert, Defamation, a camouflage of psychic interest: The beginning of a behavioral analysis, 15 Vanderbilt 1173-1201.

Colin Rhys Lovell, The 'reception' of defamation by the common law, 15 Vanderbilt 1051-71.

Laurence H. Eldredge, Practical problems in preparation and trial of libel cases, 15 Vanderbilt 1085-92.

Arno C. Brecht, The absolute privilege of the executive in defamation, 15 Vanderbilt 1127-71.

Constitutionality of Oregon's retraction statute: Holden v. Pioneer Broadcasting Co. (365 P.2d 845, Or. 1961) 41 U. Oregon 170-72.

Alec Samuels, Problems of assessing damages for defamation, 79 Law Quarterly Rev. 63-86.

S. Samuel Di Falco, Libel in wills, 8 N.Y.U.L.F. 495-514.

Luis Kutner, Unfair comment: A warning to news media, 17 U. Miami 51-74.

Comments: Privilege of newsmen to conceal source of information, 15 U. Oklahoma 453-56.

Absolute privilege as applied to investigators for Congressional committees, 63 Columbia 326-44.

Case notes:

Libel and slander in broadcasting: American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc. v. Simpson. (126 S.E.2d 873, Ga. App. 1962): 37 Tulane 147-49; 36 Temple 240-43.

Absolute privilege for federal employees in libel and slander: Poss v. Liebermann (299 F.2d 358, CA 2 1962), Carr v. Watkins (227 Md. 578, 177 A.2d 841, 1962) 48 Cornell 199-206.

Defenses of qualified privilege and fair comment: Ponder v. Cobb (275 N.C. 281, 126 S.E.2d 67, 1962) 41 U. No. Carolina 153-58.

Defamation, unfair competition, right of privacy, right of publicity: Lahr v. Adell Chem. Co. (300 F.2d 256, CA 1 1962) 48 Cornell 360-70.

61.9.

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. (U.S.S.C., #606.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 9, 72. Cite for cert. granted: 371 U.S. 946.*

61.9a.

Commr. James v. The New York Times, Rev. Shuttlesworth, et al. (Montgomery Cir. Ct.)*

61.9b.

Commr. Parks and Patterson v. The New York Times. (U.S.S.C., #687.)* Case note: 16 U. Oklahoma 108-110.

61.10.

Gov. Patterson v. The New York Times, Rev. King, Shuttlesworth, et al. (Montgomery Co. Ct.)*

61.11.

The New York Times v. Connor and Bessemer City Commrs. (CA 5, #19781.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10. Cite: 310 F.2d 133.

61.16.

Barton v. Gov. Barnett. (Hinds Co. Cir. Ct., #16,525.)*

61.17.

Franklin v. Paradise American Legion Post 259. (Butte Co. Super. Ct., Calif.)*

61.18.

Pauling v. Anti-Communist League of York Co. (MD Pa., #7940.) Nov. 30, 1962: Pl. filed suit for damages, alleging that Def. referred to Pl. as "an identified Communist." Pending. Drinker, Biddle and Reath, Esqs., 1100 Philadelphia National Bank Bldg., Philadelphia.

61.18a.

Pauling v. National Review. (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) 1963: Pl. filed suit charging that articles printed in Def.-magazine branded him "a traitor, a collaborator with subversive foreign and alien elements. . . ." Suit asks $1,000,000. damages. Michael Levi Matar, Esq., 103 Park Ave., NYC.

61.18b.

Pauling v. News Syndicate Co. Inc. (CA 2) Pl. filed suit against Def.-publisher of NY Daily News seeking $500,000 damages for allegedly defamatory editorial comment about him. 1963: Trial resulted in verdict for Defs. Pls. appeal pending.

61.18c.

Pauling v. Bellingham Publishing Co. (WD Wash. N. Div.) 1961: Pl. filed suit for libel, based on 5 letters printed in newspaper which reflected on his loyalty. May, 1963: Def.-newspaper published retraction written by Pl., paid $16,000 damages. Francis Hoague, Esq., 1410 Hoge Bldg., Seattle, Wash.

61.18d.

Pauling v. St. Louis Globe-Democrat. (ED Mo., E. Div. #61 C 312.) 1961: Pl. filed suit for publication of allegedly defamatory letters. Pending. John R. Green, Esq., Boatmen's Bank Bldg., St. Louis.

62. By Injunction in Labor Disputes
- 96 -

63. By Injunction in Other Situations
And see cases at 204.

63.2.

Alabama ex rel. Atty. Genl. Gallion v. Gray. (Talladega Co. Cir. Ct., #9760.)*

63.3.

Mitnick d/b/a Central Fourth Street Drugstore v. Fair Share Organization. (Ind. App. Ct., #19741.)* See cases at 570's.

63.4.

B & B Cash Grocery Stores, Inc. v. Young Adults for Progressive Action. (Cir. Ct., 13th Jud. Cir., Hillsborough Co., Fla., Chancery, #124971-C.)*

63.5.

Kelley v. Page. (Albany.) (MD Ga., #727.)* and Anderson v. City of Albany. (MD Ga., #730.)* and Anderson v. City of Albany. (MD Ga., #731.)*

63.6.

Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Wash. Chap. of CORE. (DC DC, #3238-62.)*

64. Against Miscellaneous Activities

70. Procedural Problems

71. In Alleging Standing to Sue

72. In Raising and Preserving Constitutional Questions

90. Miscellaneous Freedom of Thought

90.2.

Westlake Subdivision Improvement Assn. v. Klein. (San Mateo Super. Ct., #94100.)*

FREEDOM OF RELIGION (100-199)

110. Separation of Church and State

111. In Education
Law review articles:

Jesse H. Choper, Religion in the public schools: A proposed constitutional standard, 47 U. Minnesota 329-416.

Leo Pfeffer, Court, Constitution and prayer, 16 Rutgers 635-752.

David W. Louisell and John H. Jackson, Religion, theology, and public higher education, 50 U. California 751-99.

Clifton B. Kruse, Jr., The historical meaning and judicial construction of the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment, 2 Washburn 65-141.

Edmond Cahn, On government and prayer, 37 New York 981-1000.

M. C. Slough and Patrick D. McAnany, S.J., Government aid to church-related schools: An analysis, 11 U. Kansas 35-75.

Robert E. Rodes, Jr., The passing of nonsectarianism: Some reflections on the school prayer case, 38 Notre Dame 115-137.

The Arthur Garfield Hays Civil Liberty Conference: Public aid to parochial schools and standing to bring suit, 12 U. Buffalo 35-65.

Comments:

New York prayer decision: Its effect on Arizona school practices, 4 U. Arizona 272-78.

Public school prayers and the establishment of religion, 14 Mercer 284-94.

Religious exercises in the schools, 31 U. Cincinnati 408-34.

Comment: The Supreme Court, the First Amendment, and religion in the public schools, 63 Columbia 73-97.

Judicial disestablishment in public education, 57 Northwestern U. 578-595.

Testing validity of congressional bill authorizing federal aid to private education, 8 Villanova 224-236.

111.6.

School Dist. of Abington Township, Pa. v. Schempp. (U.S.S.C., #142.)*

111.8.

Engel v. Vitale. (370 U.S. 421.) Facts: VII DOCKET 105. Case notes: 14 Syra. 48-51; 76 Harv. 25-32; 24 U. Pitt. 179-182; 37 Tulane 124-29; 31 Fordham 201-06; 34 U. Miss. 119-21; 27 U. Albany 119-23; 12 DePaul 128-33; 31 Geo. Wash. 497-504; 1962 U. Ill. 472-75; 46 Marq. 233-37; 16 Vanderbilt 206-14; 24 Ohio St. 173-78; 36 S. Calif. 240-54.

111.10.

Chamberlin and Resnick v. Miami and Dade Co. Bds. of Educ. (U.S.S.C.) (143 S.2d 21.)*

111.20.

Brown v. Orange Co. Bd. of Pub. Inst. (Fla. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 11. Fla. Sup. Ct. denied Def.-Bd's. petition for cert.

111.22.

Murray v. Curlett, Baltimore School Bd. (U.S.S.C., #119.)*

111.23.

Polster v. Centennial Joint School Bd. (Bucks Co., Pa. Super. Ct., #M 1 (1962).)

110.25.

Matthews v. Quinton. (Alas. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VII DOCKET 6, 74. Cite: 362 P.2d 932. Case note: 8 N.Y.U.L.F. 424-31.

112. In Public Places

112.25.

Co. of Los Angeles and Bethlehem Star Parade Assn. v. Hollinger. (Dist. Ct. App., 2nd Dist., #26868.)*

120. Conscientious Objection to War
Law review article: Francis J. Conklin. S.J., Conscientious objector provisions: A view in the light of Torcaso v. Watkins, 51 Georgetown 252-83.

121. Through Application for C. O. Status

121.26.

Harshman v. U.S. (U.S.S.C., #515.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12, 73. April 1, 1963: On motion of government, case remanded to DC with instruction to dismiss indictment.

121.27.

U.S. v. Parker. (U.S.S.C., #516.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12, 73. April 1, 1963: Same action as Harshman, 121.26.

121.28.

U.S. v. N.J. Harshman. (ND Ill.)

122. Through Refusal to Register

123. Through Civil Disobedience

123.22.

U.S. v. Aarons and Swann. (CA 2.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12. Cite: 310 F.2d 341.

- 97 -

123.24.

U.S. v. Henry Foster. (ND Calif., N. Div., #13468.)*

123.26.

Council v. Donovan, NYC Sup't. of Schools. (Kings Co. Sup. Ct., #3496/1963.)*

130. Denial of Tax Exemption to Institutions (see also 202, 266)

140. Sunday Closing Laws
Law review article: John E. Donaldson, Freedom of religion: Recent Sunday closing laws cases, 3 William and Mary 384-94.

Comment: State Sunday closing laws and the First and Fourteenth Amendments, 8 N.Y.U.L.F. 403-09.

Case notes:

Sabbatarian's refusal of Saturday work renders him unavailable for work and constitutes failure to accept suitable work without good cause: Sherbert v. Verner (125 S.E.2d 737, 1962, prob. juris. noted, 31 U.S.L. Week 3201, U.S. Dec. 18, 1962; No. 526):

76 Harvard 854-57; 111 U. Pa. 253-57.

Is a statute constitutional which forbids sale of automobiles on Sunday?: Courtesy Motors v. Ward (24 Ill.2d 82, 179 N.E.2d 692, 1962) 39 Chicago-Kent 176-81.

Right of state legislature to require observance of a day of rest: Mandell v. Haddon (202 Va. 979, 121 S.E.2d 516, 1961) 3 William and Mary 523-27.

140.30.

Arlan's Department Store of Louisville, Inc. v. Kentucky. (U.S.S.C., #503.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 73. Cite for U.S.S.C. dismissing appeal; 371 U.S. 218. Case note: 22 U. Maryland 357-58.

150. Miscellaneous Restrictions

151. In Prisons
Comment: Black Muslims in prison: Of Muslim rites and constitutional rights, 62 Columbia 1488-1504.

And see cases at 304.

151.2.

Pierce v. Warden LaVallee. (Dannemora.) (WD NY, #7813.)*

151.4.

Sewell v. Pegelow. (ED Va.)*

151.5.

Bratcher v. McGinnis. (Attica State Prison.) (WD NY, #9398.)*

152. In Other Places

152.5.

Dawud and Dakota Staton v. Muhammad and Muhammad's Temple of Islam. (ED Pa., #31539.)*

152.7.

Oliver v. Udall. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 74, Cite for cert. denied: 372 U.S. 908.

FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: AFFECTING THE ORGANIZATION (200-239)

200. Organizational Privileges Challenged

201. As to Meetings (see also 11, 63)

202. As to Tax Exemption (see also 130, 266)

202.4.

U.S. v. Communist Party, Hall, Flynn, Davis, Bart. (SD N.Y.)* And see 202.4a.

202.4a.

Communist Party v. Commr. of Internal Revenue. (CA DC.)*

202.5.

Re Revocation of Exemption of Fellowship of Reconciliation. (Int. Rev. Serv.) 1926: Organization given IRS exemption. Jan. 10, 1963: After administrative due process, exemption revoked. May 15, 1963: Petition for reconsideration filed; after informal conference IRS agreed to take under consideration reinstatement. Michael Standard, Esq., 30 E. 42d St., NYC.

203. As to N.L.R.B. Certification (see also 245, 291)

203.3.

U.S. v. R. Dennis. (DC Colo.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 13, 74. Retrial date: August 27, 1963. And see Mine-Mill, 212.1.

204. As to Continued Existence (see also 63, 213, 223)

204.1.

Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. NAACP. (U.S.S.C.)*

204.4.

NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Button. (ED Va., #2436.)*

204.4a.

NAACP v. Button, Va. Atty. Genl. (U.S.S.C., #5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 14, 74. Cite: 371 U.S. 415.

204.4b.

NAACP Legal Defense Fund v. Gray (formerly v. Button.) (Richmond Cir. Ct., #B-2879.)*

204.4c.

Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar v. NAACP, NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund, Inc., Va. State Conf. of Branches, NAACP. (Richmond Chancery Ct., #503.)*

204.8.

Arkansas ex rel. Atty. Genl. v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund. (Cir. Ct., Pulaski Co., #44,679.)*

204.9.

Arkansas ex rel. Atty. Genl. v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund. (Cir. Ct., Pulaski Co., #45,183.)*

204.18.

Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. CORE. (Montgomery Cir. Ct.)*

210. Compulsory Registration

211. Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act

211.1a.

U.S. v. Communist Party. (CA DC.)*

211.1b-1c.

U.S. v. Hall and Davis. (DC DC, Cr. # #228-62, 229-62.)*

211.1d-.1m.

Albertson, Friedlander, Johnson, Patterson, Tormey, Weinstock, Healey, Lima, Nelson, Proctor, Lightfoot, Davis, Kushner, Hall v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)* Amicus brief for National Lawyers Guild filed by Laurent Frantz, Esq., 936 Shevlin Drive, El Cerrito, Calif. and Leonard B. Boudin, Esq., 30 E. 42nd St., NYC.

211.1n-1t.

Kennedy v. Taylor, Dobbs, Stanford, L. Libson, Gabow, A. Libson, Tormey. (S.A.C.B.) June 13, 1963: Atty. Genl. filed petitions with SACB for orders requiring Respondents to register themselves as members of the Communist Party under Internal Security Act §8. Pending. John J. Abt. Esq., 320 Broadway, NYC, and Joseph Forer, Esq., 711 14th St. NW, Washington, D.C.

- 98 -

211.2.

Jefferson School v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)*

211.3.

Labor Youth League v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 15. April 25, 1963: CA found organization defunct; refused to affirm order against defunct organization.

211.4.

Nat'l. Council of American-Soviet Friendship v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 15. May 16, 1963: CA set aside order for registration; held evidence insufficient to support finding of Communist control of organization.

211.5.

Civil Rights Congress v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)*

211.6.

Kennedy v. Washington Pension Union. (S.A.C.B., #114-55.)*

211.7.

Haufrecht v. S.A.C.B. (re American Peace Crusade) (CA DC.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 15. June 6, 1963: CA found organization defunct, refused to affirm order against defunct organization.

211.8.

California Labor School in San Francisco v. S.A.C.B. (S.A.C.B.)*

211.9.

Am. Comm. for Protection of Foreign Born v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC, #15,960.)*

211.10.

Kennedy v. California Emergency Defense Committee. (S.A.C.B.)*

211.12.

Blau v. S.A.C.B. (re Colo. Comm. to Protect Civil Liberties. (CA DC.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 16. June 6, 1963: CA found organization defunct, refused to affirm order against defunct organization.

211.13.

Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC, #13,174.)*

211.14.

United May Day Comm. v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)*

211.15.

Kennedy v. Advance. (S.A.C.B.)*

212. Under 1954 Communist Control Act

212.1.

Kennedy v. Intl. Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers. (S.A.C.B.) (CA DC, #17,135.)* And see R. Dennis, 203.3.

213. Under State Laws (see also 204)

220. Listing

221. By the Attorney General of the United States

222. By Congressional Committees
And see cases at 271.

222.1.

Wheeldin v. Wheeler. (U.S.S.C., #493.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 16, 74. June 3, 1963: U.S.S.C. affirmed (6-3) by Douglas, J.: No fedl. cause of action can be made out; there was no search or seizure and no violation of Fourth Amendment; Civil Rights Act inapplicable; Congress has not created a cause of action for abuse of subpoena power by fedl. officer; no claim made under Fedl. Tort Claims Act; statute which only grants power to issue subpoenas does not imply cause of action for abuse of that power, though it could do so. Brennen, J. (Warren, C.J., Black, J.) diss.: Case should be vacated and remanded to CA for consideration of questions not decided in light of correct application of Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 (61.7, IV DOCKET 90); tentative bases for cause of action here lie in House Rule XI(q) (2), 60 Stat. 828, or a federal common law right.

223. By State Authorities (see also 24, 281)

223.3.

Elfbrandt v. Russell, Arizona Gov. Fannin. (Ariz. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 17. May 1, 1963: Ariz. Sup. Ct. affirmed denial of petition. May 28: Motion for rehearing denied.

FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: AFFECTING THE MEMBERS (240-294)
Comment: Judicial protection of membership in private associations, 11 Western Reserve 346-60.

240. Criminal Penalties for Membership

241. Under Smith Act: for Conspiracy

242. Under Smith Act: for Mere Membership

242.a.

U.S. v. Hall, Davis, Winter, Potash, Green, Thompson, Winston, Gates. (SD N.Y.) Jy. 1948: Defs., alleged Communist Party leaders, indicted under Smith Act conspiracy section (see 241., Dennis, 341 U.S. 494) and membership section (never tried). May 13, 1963: Defs. moved to dismiss on ground indictments insufficient. May 29, 1963: indictments nol pros'd. on motion of U.S. because witnesses no longer available and Defs. "sufficiently punished". John J. Abt, Esq., 320 Broadway, NYC.

242.4.

Noto v. U.S. (367 U.S. 290.) Facts: VII DOCKET 42. Case note: 17 U. Miami 223-229.

242.8.

Hellman v. U.S. (298 F.2d 810.) Facts: VII DOCKET 42. Case note: 23 Ohio St. 761-766.

243. Under 18 U.S.C. 2384

244. Under Kennedy-Landrum-Griffin Act (29 U.S.C. 504) (See also 203, 291)

244.1.

U.S. v. Brown. (CA 9.)*

245. Under State Laws (see also 54)

245.15.

Indiana v. Levitt, Bingham, Morgan. (Monroe Co. Cir. Ct., #601.) May 1, 1963: Defs., students at Indiana University, members of Young Socialist Alliance, indicted on charges of subversion under 1951 Indiana statute for "assembling for the purpose of advocating or teaching the doctrine that the government of the United States or State of Indiana should be overthrown by force, violence, or any unlawful means...." Pending. James R. Cotner, Esq., W. 6th St., Bloomington, Indiana.

- 99 -

246. Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act

246.1.

U.S. v. Robels. (WD Wash., #50676.) 1963: Def.-shipyard worker indicted under §5 (a) (1) (D) of McCarran Act for engaging in defense work while a member of Communist Party knowing final order of registration in effect against Party. Def. has worked at same plant since 1946. Issues: Constitutionality of Act, freedom of association, bill of attainder, due process. Released on own recognizance; returned to work in shipyard pending trial. John Caughlan, Esq., 220 2nd & Cherry Bldg., Seattle, Wash.

250. Civil Disabilities for Membership: Federal

251. In Federal Employment (see also 30, 268)

251.15.

Dew v. Halaby. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 17. March 28, 1963: CA DC affirmed dismissal of suit. Pl's. petition for cert. pending.

251.52.

Garrott v. U.S. (U.S. Ct. of Claims, #19-63.)* See cases at 30.5, 30.6.

252. As to Passport Applications and Right to Travel

252.27a.

Worthy v. U.S. (CA 5, #20062.)*

252.33.

Elizabeth Gurley Flynn v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC, #3478-62.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 75. June 6, 1963: Argued before 3-judge court. Decision awaited.

252.34.

Aptheker v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC, #3886-62.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 75. Status same as Flynn, 252.33.

252.35.

Zemel v. Rusk and Kennedy. (DC Conn., #9549.)*

252.36.

MacEwan v. Rusk and Kennedy. (ED Pa., #33038.)*

252.54.

U.S. v. Steadman, Bonello, Zahn. (CA 9.)*

252.55.

Copeland v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC.) 1963: Pl. filed suit to compel issuance of passport; refused to answer questions in application re Communist Party membership. Pl. contends that question on application blank, and statute under which questions asked, are unconstitutional. Pending. Victor Rabinowitz, and Leonard B. Boudin, Esqs., 30 E. 42nd St., NYC.

252.56.

Mayer v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC, #1034-63 Civ.) 1963: Def. refused to renew Pl's. passport when he refused to sign non-Communist affidavit. Pl. filed suit claiming such requirement unlawful. Pending. Francis Heisler and Charles Stewart, Esqs., P.O. Box 3996, Carmel, Calif.; Oliver E. Stone, Esq., 1500 Massachusetts Ave., and Jack Wasserman and David Carliner, Esqs., 902 Warner Bldg., all of Washington, D.C.

252.57.

Jerome v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC) 1963: Pl. filed suit to compel issuance of passport after Def. neither issued nor refused to issue; Pl. denied membership in Communist Party for past year in application. Pending. Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin, Esqs., 30 E. 42nd St., NYC.

253. As to Army Discharges (see also 341)

254. As to Veterans Disability Payments

254.2.

Thompson v. Whittier. (DC DC.)*

255. As to Social Security Benefits (see also 263, 346)
See Heikkila, 358.51.

256. In Housing Projects

257. As to Federal License Applications

257.6.

Halaby, Admr., Fed'l. Aviation Agency v. Susemihl. (Fedl. Aviation Agency.)*

257.7.

Blumenthal v. F.C.C. (U.S.S.C.) 1962: Def.-Comm. refused to renew radio telegrapher's license; FCC form contains questions re membership and affiliations of applicant. Pl's. appeal to U.S.S.C. asked: does FCC have authority to review where membership and affiliation are the sole standards? June 3, 1963: U.S.S.C. denied cert. Michael Standard, Esq., 30 E. 42d St., NYC.

258. Through Deportation Proceedings (see also 358)

258.7.

Wolf v. Boyd (Imm. Serv.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 18. Jan. 24, 1963: Since Imm. Serv. had withdrawn deportation order, suit dismissed on motion of Pl.

258.9.

Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy. (U.S.S.C., # #39, 293.)*

259. Through Denaturalization and Naturalization Proceedings (see also 358)

259.52.

Sittler v. U.S. (CA 2, #27289.) Pl.-American-born German renounced American citizenship during World War II, broadcast propaganda from Germany. 1954: Pl. returned to U.S., received Ph.D. from Northwestern U., got teaching job at Long Island U. Pl. sued for restoration of citizenship. DC denied; CA affirmed (2-1) on basis Pl. had failed to prove he has changed views since the War.

260. Civil Disabilities for Membership: State, Local and Private

261. In State or Local Government Employment

261.1.

Wilkins v. Carlander, et al. (Super. Ct. Kings Co., #490844.)*

262. In Teaching (see also 24, 267, 281 and 342)

262.5.

Golden, Detwyler and Mahin, Norman and Boyd v. Ky. State College. (ED Ky., Frankfort Div., # #197-199.)*

262.9.

Bd. of Trustees, Fullerton Jr. College v. Phillips. (Dist. Ct. of App.)*

263. As to State Unemployment Insurance Benefits (see also 255, 346)

263.2.

Communist Party v. Catherwood. (367 U.S. 389.) Facts: VII DOCKET 9. Case note: 23 Ohio State 767-70.

264. As to State License Applications
- 100 -

265. In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants (see also 345, 373)

265.28.

Willner v. Comm. on Character and Fitness. (U.S.S.C., #995.)*

266. Through Deprivation of Right to Tax Exemption (see also 130, 202)

267. In Private Employment—Teaching (see also 24, 262, 281 and 342)

268. In Private Employment — Defense Establishments (see also 344)
And see Robels, 246.1.

268.1a.

Graham v. Richamond. (CA DC.)*

268.7.

Kreznar v. Wilson. (DC DC.)*

268.11.

Lundquist v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Assn., Local 97. Calif. Sup. Ct.)*

268.18.

Margolin v. U.S. (U.S. Ct. of Claims.)*

268.19.

Colman v. Richmond. (SD NY.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 75. 1963: Coast Guard granted security clearance to Pl.

269. In Private Employment — Other

269.1.

Faulk v. AWARE. (App. Div., N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (231 N.Y.S.2d 270) Facts: VI DOCKET 17, VII DOCKET 9, 43, 108. 1962: Pl. in suit charging blacklisting had jury verdict for $2,250,000. Defs.' appeal pending. Louis Nizer, Esq., 1501 Broadway, NYC.

270. Criminal Penalties for Non-disclosure (see also 330)

271. Before Congressional Committees (see also 222, 330)
Law review article: Theodore Sky, Judicial review of Congressional investigations: Is there an alternative to contempt? 31 G. Washington 399-430.

271.9.

U.S. v. Russell. (DC DC.)* Joseph A. Fanelli, Esq., 1001 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. Case note: 41 U. Texas 590-595.

271.12.

U.S. v. Gojack. (DC DC.)*

271.15.

U.S. v. Shelton. (CA DC.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 20. 1963: On retrial, Def. again convicted. Appeal pending.

271.16.

U.S. v. Whitman. (DC DC.)*

271.19.

U.S. v. Price. (DC DC.)*

271.20.

U.S. v. Liveright. (DC DC.)*

271.27.

U.S. v. Hartman. (ND Calif., S. Div.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 76. June 21, 1963: DC dismissed indictment on grounds statute of limitations had run.

271.28.

U.S. v. Grumman. (DC DC.)*

271.29.

U.S. v. Silber. (DC DC.)*

271.33.

Yellin v. U.S. (U.S.S.C., #35.)*

271.34.

U.S. v. Lehrer. (ND Ind.)*

271.35.

U.S. v. Malis. (ND Ind.)*

271.36.

U.S. v. Samter. (ND Ind.)*

271.40.

U.S. v. O'Connor. (ND N.J.)*

272. Before State Committees (see also 204, 213, 332)

272.4a.

In Matter of Investigation by Comm. on Offenses Against Administration of Justice. (Va. Sup. Ct. of App.)*

272.10.

Rev. Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm. (U.S.S.C., #6.) (372 U.S. 539.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 22, 76. Mar. 25, 1963: U.S.S.C. reversed (5-4), Goldberg, J.: Since Def. was asked for membership list of NAACP, rather than whether he was a member of the Communist Party or about other alleged Communists, and since the NAACP is "itself a concededly legitimate and nonsubversive organization" which has also taken steps against Communists joining, "the record is insufficient to show a substantial connection between the Miami branch of the N.A.A.C.P. and Communist activities which the respondent Comm. itself concedes is an essential prerequisite to demonstrating the immediate, substantial, and subordinating state interest necessary to sustain its right of inquiry into membership lists of the association." Black, J., conc. Douglas, J. conc. in long, eloquent discussion of First Amendment guarantee of freedom of association. Harlan, J. (Clark, Stewart, White, JJ.) diss. White, J., diss.

272.12.

Jordan v. Hutcheson. (CA 4.)*

273. Before Legal and Administrative Tribunals (see also 333)

274. For Refusal to Produce Records

280. Civil Penalties for Non-disclosure

281. By Teachers (see also 24, 223, 262, 342)

281.1a.

Baggett v. Bullitt. (formerly v. Odegaard). (U. of Washington.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 22. DC upheld oath. Pls. petition for cert. pending. Arval Morris, Esq., U. of Washington Law School; Kenneth A. MacDonald, Esq., 1410 Hoge Bldg., Seattle and Byron D. Coney of counsel.

281.5b.

Re Nash, et al. (N.Y. Commr. of Educ.)*

281.5c.

Adler v. N.Y.C. Bd. of Educ. (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 22. Sup. Ct. dismissed Pls.' suit.

281.16.

Macks v. Calif. Bd. of Educ. (Dist. Ct. of App.)*

282. By Others (see also 343, 344)

290. Penalties for False Disclosure

291. Under Taft-Hartley Oath (see also 203, 245)

291.6.

U.S. v. Killian. (ND Ill.) (368 U.S. 231, 1961.) 1955: Def.-Union official convicted of filing false non-Communist- 101 - affidavit. 1957: CA reversed on Jencks point. (See 315.) On retrial, again convicted, sentenced to one-year imprisonment. CA affirmed; U.S.S.C. denied cert. June 13, 1963: Def. entered prison. David B. Rothstein, Esq., 188 W. Randolph, Chicago; M. Michael Essin, Esq., 623 N. Second St., Milwaukee; Basil Pollitt, Esq., 52 Sidney Place, Brooklyn.

292. On Government Security Questionnaires

292.2.

Ogden v. U.S. (CA 9.)*

293. In Miscellaneous Cases

293.3.

Los Angeles Bd. of Educ. v. Sloat. (Los Angeles Super. Ct., #794678.)*

295. Right of Privacy
Law review articles:

Leon Brittan, The right of privacy in England and the U.S., 37 Tulane 235-68.

John W. Wade, Defamation and the right of privacy, 15 Vanderbilt 1093-1125.

Case notes:

Republication of photograph from newsworthy magazine article to advertise content and quality of magazine held no invasion of privacy: Booth v. Curtis Publishing Co. (15 App. Div.2d 343, 223 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1st Dept., aff'd mem., 11 N.Y.2d 907, 182 N.E.2d 812, 228 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1962) 62 Columbia 1355-61; 31 Fordham 394-98.

Tort of invasion of privacy recognized in Maryland: Carr v. Watkins (277 Md. 578, 177 A.2d 841) 23 U. Maryland 84-91.

295.4.

Hall v. Graybill. (Los Angeles Co. Super. Ct.)*

II. DUE PROCESS AND RELATED RIGHTS (FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, SEVENTH, EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS (300-499)

Law review articles:

John Scurlock, Procedural protection of the individual against the state, 30 U. of Kansas City 111-48.

Roscoe Pound, Policing and justice: Administration and adjudication, 49 U. Virginia 744-58.

300. Searches and Seizures
Comments:

The Fourth Amendment and evidence obtained by government agent's trespass, 42 U. Nebraska 166-79.

Collateral attack of pre-Mapp v. Ohio convictions based on illegally obtained evidence in state courts, 16 Rutgers 587-96.

Case notes:

Basis for reasonable search: U.S. v. Eldridge (302 F.2d 463, CA 4 1962) 36 Temple 95-98.

Second circuit refuses to limit police investigations of persons accused of crime: U.S. v. Massiah (307 F.2d 62, CA 2 1962) 111 U. Pa. 501-6.

301. By Wiretapping

Legislation note: Electronic eavesdropping: Sec. 345-a, 29 Brooklyn 132-35.

Comment: Wiretap evidence from viewpoint of law enforcement officer, 17 U. Wyoming 49-57.

301.7.

Lanza v. New York. (370 U.S. 139) Facts: VII DOCKET 110. Case note: 24 U. Pitt. 182-4.

301.11.

Silverman v. U.S. (365 U.S. 505) Facts: VI DOCKET 113. Case note: 12 American U. 83-86.

301.16.

Washington v. Cory. (Wash. Sup. Ct.)*

301.20.

U.S. v. Sen Harris. (ED La., Baton Rouge Div., ##1422-1424.)*

301.22.

Dinan v. New York. Facts: VIII DOCKET 24. Case notes: 111 U. Penn. 832-37; 12 DePaul 159-63; 27 Albany 141-45; 63 Colgate 369-74.

302. In Other Federal Criminal Cases

302.20.

DiBella v. U.S.; U.S. v. Koenig (369 U.S. 121.) Facts: VII DOCKET 80. Case note: 22 U. Maryland 253-54.

302.22.

U.S. v. Wallace (CA 5.) (205 F.Supp. 175.) 1962: Def. convicted of violating federal narcotic import act. Issues on appeal: (1) unreasonable search and seizure; (2) coerced confession; (3) hearsay evidence. Pending. Benjamin Smith, Esq., 1006 Baronne Bldg., 305 Baronne St., New Orleans.

303. In Other State Criminal Cases

303.28.

Massachusetts v. Dorius. (Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct.)*

303.35.

Sackler v. Sackler. (16 N.Y. App. Div. 423.) Facts: VII DOCKET 81. Case notes: 63 Colgate 168-75; 27 Albany 137-41; 48 Cornell 345-53; 31 Fordham 390-93.

303.41.

Hawaii v. Evans. (Haw. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 25, 77. Cite: 372 P.2d 365.

303.42.

Ker v. California. (U.S.S.C.)*

303.43.

New York v. Randazzo. (NY Sup. Ct., 1st Jud. Dist.)*

303.44.

Head v. Mississippi. (U.S.S.C.) (136 So.2d 619.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 77. Cite for cert. denied: 371 U.S. 910.

304. Suits for False Arrest, Police Brutality (see also 580 and 151)
[All cases in this category were formerly reported at 420.]

Pamphlet: Documents on Human Rights in Alabama. Inter-Citizens Comm., Box 1443, Birmingham, Ala.

Case note: Municipal liability for police dog bites: Barr v. District of Columbia (202 F.Supp. 260, 1962) 22 U. Maryland 260-61.

304.1.

Prof. Genovese v. N.Y.C. (N.Y. Co. Sup. Ct.)*

304.2.

Hallowell v. N.Y.C. (NYC Comptroller, #155363.)*

- 102 -

304.3.

Massey v. NYC Police Commr. (Queens Co. Ct.)*

304.4.

Jackson v. City of New York. (NYC Comptroller.)*

304.5.

Richici v. Bielski. (Ill. Ct. of App.)*

304.6.

Monroe v. Pape and City of Chicago. (ND Ill., E. Div., #596329.)*

304.7.

Swanson v. McGuire, et al. (ND Ill., #57-C-1164.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 26. Trial date: Sept. 15, 1963.

304.8.

Duble v. Brown and Chicago. (Cook Co. Super. Ct., #60 S 19040.)*

304.8a.

Duble v. Brown and Chicago. (ND Ill., E. Div., 61 C 1404.)*

304.9.

Cedeno, et al. v. Lichenstein. (ND Ill., #58-C-1712.)*

304.10.

Gonzalez v. Genl. Investigators Inc. (ND Ill., #60 C 1806.)*

304.11.

Dean v. Smith and Chicago. (Cook Co. Cir. Ct., #58 C 12494.)*

304.12.

Cunningham v. Stried and Rygiel. (Lake Co. Cir. Ct.)*

304.13.

Wirin v. Hilden. (SD Calif.)*

304.14.

Goldberger v. Lewis. (San Francisco Super. Ct.)*

304.16.

Lucero v. Donovan, Carnover. (SD Calif.)*

304.17.

Rev. Morris v. Capt. Ray. (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 27. 1963: After trial, jury verdict for Def. Pl's. appeal to CA 5 pending.

304.18.

Rev. Jones v. Teasley. (CA 5.)*

304.19.

Nesmith v. Alford. (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 27. May 30, 1963: CA 5 affirmed instructed verdict for one Def.-police officer; reversed (2-1) judgment for other Defs. on point of faulty instructions to jury.

304.20.

Horn v. Baillie, Greenwood and U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. (CA 9, #5319.) (309 F.2d 167.)*

304.21.

Ware v. Johnson. (MD Ga., Albany Div., #749.) Facts: VII DOCKET 71. April 12, 1963: After trial, verdict for Def. Appeal pending.

304.22.

Brazier v. Cherry. (MD Ga., Americus Div., #475.)* Case note: 40 U. Texas 1050-53.

304.24.

Harkins and Frankfort v. NYC. (Brooklyn Sup. Ct.)*

304.25.

California v. Imbler; In re Imbler. (Calif. Sup. Ct., # #6999, 7212 Cr.)*

304.26.

Green v. Azzam (ED Mich., E. Div. #23224) 1962: Pl-Negro arrested "for investigation," allegedly beaten, shot trying to escape. No charges filed. Pl. paralyzed, has had one leg amputated. 1963: Pl. sued for damages under 28 U.S.C. 1343, 42 U.S.C. 1988, et. seq. Pending. Ernest Goodman, Esq., 3220 Cadillac Tower, Detroit.

304.27.

Duzynski v. Nosal. (CA 7, #14088.) 1962: Pl. filed suit in DC alleging illegal commitment to Ill. Mental Health Clinic; charges denial of right to counsel, due process. DC dismissed, sustaining immunity of Co. employees. Issue on appeal: Is this defense available under Civil Rights Act when conspiracy and willful acts are charged? Pending. Barton Joseph, Esq., 134 N. LaSalle, Chicago.

310. Indictment

311. Challenge to Composition of Grand Jury (see also 510s)

312. Attacks on Character of Evidence
Case notes:

Confessions made to court-appointed psychiatrists held admissible for purpose of determining Def's. guilt: People v. Ditson (369 P.2d 714, 20 Cal. Rptr. 165, cert. den. 83 Sup. Ct. 93, 1962) 8 Utah 141-44.

Exclusion of illegally obtained evidence extended to civil action: Lassoff v. Gray (207 F.Supp. 843, WDKy. 1962) 48 U. Iowa 710-17.

Admissibility of a recorded telephone conversation: Carnes v. U.S. (295 F.2d 598, CA 5 1961; cert. denied, 369 U.S. 859, 1962) 16 U. Oklahoma 100-02.

Searches and seizures and admissibility of evidence; People v. Friola (182 N.E.2d 100, N.Y. 1962) 12 DePaul 163-66.

312.26.

New York v. Molina del Rio. (NY Ct. of App.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 27, 78. 1963: Def. returned to Cuba in exchange for political prisoner; appeal dropped.

313. Charge of Entrapment
Case note: 21 requests of a Def. with "quick access" to drugs do not constitute entrapment: People v. Toler (185 N.E.2d 874, Ill. 1962) 8 Villanova 413-16.

314. Charge of Conspiracy
Case notes: If only two persons are indicted for the crime of conspiracy and one is acquitted in a separate trial, the acquittal operates to deprive the court of jurisdiction to render a judgment of conviction on the other Def's. guilty plea: Eyman v. Deutsch (373 P.2d 716, Ariz. 1962): 24 U. of Pitt. 647-50; 65 U.W.Va. 151-54; 39 U. No. Dakota 116-18.

314.6.

U.S. v. Agueci. (CA 2, #27466) (310 F.2d 817) 1962: Def. convicted of smuggling heroin in trial of 10 Defs. jointly. Dec. 1962: CA affirmed, but criticized practice of mass criminal trials; "these trials do not always steer a straight course toward the determination of innocence or guilt, but are rather excursions in tangential issues..."

315. Inspection of Pre-Trial Statements of Government Witnesses
(Including Jencks point, 353 U.S. 357, and Jencks Act, 18 USC 3500.)

316. Inspection of Grand Jury Minutes

320. Double Jeopardy
Comments:

Double jeopardy, multiple prosecution, and multiple punishment, 50 U. California 866-79.

Jurisdiction and double jeopardy, 16 Rutgers 597-607.

Case note: Acquittal of federal crime does not bare subsequent trial in state court for state criminal offense arising out of same act: People v. Lo Cicero (230 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2d Dept. 1962) 31 Fordham 587-92.

- 103 -

321. In Federal Cases

321.11.

Fong Foo v. U.S. (369 U.S. 141.) Facts: VII DOCKET 111. Case note: 39 U. Detroit 696-701.

322. In State Cases
Case notes:

Indictment for assault following burglary acquittal based on same occurrence: State v. Robinson (114 N.W.2d 737, Minn.; cert. denied, 371 U.S. 815, 1962) 47 U. Minnesota 273-77.

Recidivist statute does not authorize filing of information against one who has completed sentence for principal offense: Reynolds v. Cochran (138 So.2d 500, Fla. 1962) 48 U. Virginia 1153-58.

330. Self-incrimination: Criminal Sanctions for Exercising Privilege (see also 270)
Comments:

Scope of statutory immunity required by the Fifth Amendment self-incrimination privilege, 57 Northwestern 561-77.

Unless question itself contains threat, witness must state area or nature of criminal exposure feared, short of giving a hurtful answer, 8 N.Y.U.L.F. 409-23.

Case note: Requirement that prisoner be "duly cautioned": Spry v. Boles (299 F.2d 332, CA 4 1962) 65 U. W. Virginia 60-62.

331. Before Congressional Committees

332. Before State Committees

333. Before Grand Juries and Tribunals

334. Grants of Immunity: Federal

334.7.

Shotwell Mfg. Co. v. U.S. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 78. Cite: 371 U.S. 341.

335. Grants of Immunity: State

336. Criminal Registration Laws
And see 1950 Internal Security Act, 211.

337. Miscellaneous

340. Self-incrimination: Civil Sanctions for Exercising Privilege (see also 280)
Comment: The self-incrimination privilege: Barrier to criminal discovery? 51 U. California 136-45.

341. Effect on Army Discharges (see also 253)

342. Effect on Employment — Public School Teachers (see also 262, 267, 281)

342.4a.

Mass v. San Francisco Bd. of Educ. (San Fran. Super. Ct.)*

343. Effect on Employment — Other Public Officers (see also 261)

344. Effect on Employment — Private (see also 30, 268, 269)
Law review article: Michael C. Slotnick, The anathema of the security risk: Arbitrary dismissals of federal government civilian employees and civilian employees of private contractors doing business with the federal gov't., 17 U. Miami 10-50.

344.6.

United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local 610 v. Westinghouse Airbrake Co. (Allegheny Co. Ct. of Common Pleas, #3132.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 29. Appeal to be withdrawn by Union.

345. Effect on Attorneys (see also 265, 373)

346. Effect on Unemployment Insurance and Social Security (see also 263)
And see Heikkila, 358.51.

350. Due Process
Law review article: John S. Harrington, Police detention of suspects, 3 William and Mary 395-402.

Comment: Recent developments in permissible police practice, 46 Marquette 227-32.

Case note: Def. at joint trial has constitutional right not to have comments on his failure to testify made by co-Def's. attorney: De Luna v. U.S. (308 F.2d 140, CA 5 1962) 49 U. Virginia 356-62.

351. In Arraignment (Delay)

352. In Grand Jury Procedures (see also 311, 316)

353. In Obtaining Confessions
Law review articles:

Donald B. King, Developing a future constitutional standard for confessions, 8 Wayne 481-96.

Wilfred J. Ritz, State criminal confession cases: Subsequent developments in cases reversed by U.S. Supreme Court and some current problems, 19 Washington & Lee 202-32.

Gilbert G. Ackroyd, Corroboration of confessions in federal and military trials, 8 Villanova 64-75.

Post-arraignment, pre-indictment confession: Admissibility: New York v. Meyer (182 N.E.2d 103, 1962) 29 Brooklyn 151-54.

Confession elicited during illegal detention renders inadmissible second confession obtained 20 hours later but before accused had conferred with counsel: Killough v. U.S. (No. 16398, CA DC Oct. 4, 1962) 51 Georgetown 394-99.

Admissibility of confessions: New York v. Everett (180 N.E.2d 556, cert. denied, 370 U.S. 963, 1962) 8 N.Y. U.L.F. 554-60.

353.16.

Lynumn v. Illinois. (U.S.S.C., #9.) (171 N.E.2d 17.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 29; elaboration: Police officers arrested one Zeno, asked him to cooperate and "they would go light" on him; he went to Def's. apt. and emerged with package containing marijuana. Police arrested Def.; said she would lose Aid to Dependent Children and probably lose custody of children unless she cooperated; Def. made oral confession of sale to Zeno. Def. convicted of possession- 104 - and sale of marijuana; 10 yrs. Ill. Sup. Ct. affirmed. Mar. 25, 1963: U.S.S.C. unanimously reversed, Stewart, J.: (1) Altho Def. did not explicitly assert her fedl. constitutional claim in trial ct., U.S.S.C. ordered Def. to secure certificate from Ill. Sup. Ct. as to whether its judgment rested on adequate independent state ground and Ct. said no; (2) Rule restated that "even though there may have been sufficient evidence, apart from the coerced confession, to support a judgment of conviction, the admission in evidence, over objection, of the coerced confession vitiates the judgment because it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment", Payne v. Ark., 356 U.S. 560, 568 (#353.4, III DOCKET 80.) Jewel Rogers Lafontant, Esq., 180 W. Washington, Chicago.

353.18.

Gallegos v. Colorado (370 U.S. 49.) Facts: VII DOCKET 112. Case notes: 50 U. California 903-09; 48 U. Iowa 518-24; 15 U. Ala. 234-38; 31 U. Connecticut 454-62; 35 U. Colorado 256-59.

353.19.

Missouri v. Cookson. (Mo. Sup. Ct. #49,202.)*

353.20.

Pate v. Oklahoma. (U.S.S.C., #286 Misc.) (371 P.2d 500.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 29, 78. May 13, 1963: U.S.S.C. denied certiorari.

353.21.

Ralph v. Pepersack, Warden. (DC Md., # 13696.)*

353.22.

Davis v. North Carolina. (ED N.C., Raleigh Div., #1302) Dec. 1959: Pet.-Negro found guilty of rape-murder; death. 1962: Pet. brought habeas corpus action alleging: (1) confession given because he was "scared and hungry"; (2) held incommunicado for 16 days. Feb. 20, 1963: hearing in DC. Decision awaited. W. B. Nivens, Esq., 326 S. Alexander St.; Charles V. Bell and Calvin L. Brown, Esqs., 422½ E. 2nd St., all of Charlotte, N.C.

353.23.

Colman v. Denno. (SD NY) June 1963: Pl., under death sentence, seeks to vacate judgment on ground his 5th Amendment rights were violated in state court proceeding. Pending. Martin Garbus, Esq., 50 W. 8th St.; Jack Kroner and Stanley Levy, Esqs., 99 Park Ave., all of NYC.

354. In Press Releases and Newspaper Coverage
Comment: The jury and the press, 2 Washburn 142-57.

Case notes:

Failure of trial judge to insure adequate protection of notorious Def. from possible effects of prejudicial newspaper articles upon jury: U.S. v. Accardo (298 F.2d 133, CA 7 1962) 12 American U. 90-93.

Photography in courtroom: State v. Sharpe (122 S.E.2d 622, S.C. 1961): 14 U. So. Carolina 557-60.

Defense attorney's reply in press to prosecutor's press release prejudicial to client held not priviliged: Kennedy v. Cannon (182 A.2d 54, 1962) 111 U. Pa. 513-15.

355. In Admitting Perjured Testimony (see also 312)

355.4.

Sobell v. U.S. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 30. June 17, 1963: U.S.S.C. denied cert.

356. In Courts Martial (see also 390)