Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute Archives logo

Vol. VIII, No. 4
August, 1963
$10.00 per year

Search in this volume

Case Number: 

Enter a specific case number or use * as wildcard, e.g., 303.15, 303.*

Case Title: 

Enter keywords from the title of a case, e.g., carpenters union

Case Description: 

Enter keywords from the description of a case, e.g., segregation school

The DOCKET is published four times each year, October to July.
DOUGLAS HILL, Assistant Editor



Address: Earl Warren, Science and the law: Change and the Constitution. 12 Jour. of Pub. Law 3-8.

Law review articles:

William O. Douglas, The Bill of Rights is not enough. 38 N.Y.U. L.F. 207-42.

James Warren Beebe, Tomorrow's weapons v. the Constitution. 36 S. Calif. 373-95.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PRESS, ASSEMBLY (0-99) See also Association (200-299)
10. Licensing
11. Of Meetings (see also 201)

11.3a. ACLU of S. Calif. v. Los Angeles and San Diego Bds. of Educ. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 1, 69, 91. Petition for cert. pending.
11.15. Fields v. City of Fairfield, Ala. (U.S.S.C., #30.)*
12. Of Motion Pictures (see also 52)
13. Of Peddlers
14. Of Books, Magazines (see also 52)
Summary of legal status of "Tropic of Cancer":

Held not abscene in Mass.—Atty. Genl. v. "Tropic of Cancer" (1962) 184 NE.2d 328; Wis.—McCauley v. Tropic of Cancer (1963) 121 NW.2d 545; N.Y.—People v. Fritch (1963) 38 Misc.2d 333; Ill.—Haiman v. Morris, 14.10; Calif.—Zeitlin v. Arneborgh, 14.12.

Held obscene in Calif.—Besig v. U.S. (CA 9 1953) 208 F.2d 142; Conn.—State v. Huntington (1962) Hartford Co. Super Ct., #24657; Pa.—Comm. v. Robin (1962) Phila. Co. Ct. of Com. Pleas, #3177.

Bookseller convicted in Calif.—People v. Smith, 52.44; acquitted in Calif.—People v. Pershina, 52.45, and People v. McGilvery, 52.49. Conviction reversed in Md.—Yudkin v. State (1962) 182 A.2d 798. See 52.58.

Book held obscene but D's conduct came within "advancement of literature" exception in N.H. statute—State v. Goodhue (1962) Grafton Co. Super. Ct., #2223.

14.10. Haiman and Grove Press, Inc. v. Morris. (Ill. Sup. Ct., #37276.)*
14.10a. Grove Press, Inc. and Henry Miller v. Morris. (ND Ill., E. Div., #61 C 1784.)*
14.11. Grove Press, Inc. v. Calissi Bergen Co. Pros. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 2. Pls. appeal from 3-judge ct. decision pending in U.S.S.C.
14.12. Zeitlin v. Arneborgh. (Calif. Sup. Ct., #26905.) (27 Cal. Rptr. 320, 59 A.C. 930.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 2, 69. July 2, 1963: Calif. Sup. Ct. reversed dismissal; held declaratory judgment action proper; found "Tropic" not "hard-core pornography," therefore not exorciseable under Calif. Penal Code §311.
14.13. Florida ex rel. Gerstein v. Grove Press. (3d Dist. Ct. of App., #62-710.)*
14.14. Ronsley v. Stanczak. (Lake Co. Cir. Ct., Ill., #62-179.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 69, 92. Suit dismissed.
14.15. Larkin v. G. P. Putnam's Sons. (N.Y. Sup. Ct., #41231/1963.) Corp. Counsel sought injunction against sale, distribution of "Fanny Hill", alleging book obscene. After trial, verdict for Def.

Charles Rembar, Esq., 521 Fifth Ave., N.Y.C.

15. Of Miscellaneous Activities

15.5. F.C.C. v. Palmetto Broadcasting Co., S.C. (CA DC.) May 1960: F.C.C. notified Pl. that disc jockey on its station WDKD had broadcast vulgar material over 9-yr. period. Pl. discharged disc jockey. Mar. 1961: F.C.C. denied Pl. renewal of license. Appeal pending.

Amicus appearance by ACLU, 156 5th Ave., NYC.

15.6. City of Baltimore v. Moore. (City Ct.) 3 Defs. on peace walk from Canada to Cuba arrested: carrying walk into public park without permit. One Def. released on paying $10 fine; 3 Defs. refused to pay, jailed.
- 122 -

20. Administrative Restrictions
21. By U. S. Customs
22. By U. S. Postmaster

22.15. Heilberg v. Fixa. (ND Calif.) Suit for injunction against enforcement of 39 U.S.C. §4008 (detention of mail from certain countries as "communist political propaganda" and destruction of mail unless addressee indicates willingness to receive it.) 3-judge ct. denied motion for relief after U.S. Atty. personally delivered mail to Pl. Oct. 21: argument on Gov't's. motion to dismiss as moot.

Marshall W. Krause and Coleman Blease, Esqs., for ACLU, 503 Market St., San Francisco.

22.16. Amlin v. Postmaster General. (SD Calif., #63-635-PH.) June 1963: Suit filed similar to Heilberg, 22.15. Aug. 19, 1963: Hearing on Def's. motion to dismiss; decision awaited.

A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand, Esqs., 257 S. Spring St., Los Angeles.

23. On Government Information and Secrecy
24. On Students and Professors (see also 223, 262, 281 and 342)
Law review article: Robbey E. George, Dismissal of permanent teachers. 3 Santa Clara U. 164-67.


Grounds for removal or suspension of teachers. 8 S. Dak. U. 138-44.

Judicial review of Univ. expulsions, 72 Yale 1362.

Due process in student disciplinary proceedings, 1962 U. Ill. 438-51.

24.20. Koch v. Bd. of Trustes, U. of Ill. S. H. Bucholz, Esq., 19 S. LaSalle St., Chicago 3, Ill.
24.21. Egan v. Moore, Trs. of State Univ. of State of New York. (App. Div., 3d Dept., #324-63.)*
24.25. Byrd v. Gary. (ED S.C.)*
24.26. Ritter v. Matthews, Trs. (N. Texas State U.) (ED Tex., Sherman Div., #9238.)*
24.27. Wilkinson and Schwartz v. Bd. of Trs., Ohio State Univ. (SD Ohio, E. Div., #6611). March 7, 1963: Pl. filed suit challenging University regulation under which he was denied right to speak on campus, sought 3-judge ct. Issues: (1) right of Univ. to bar guest speakers for their political beliefs or associations; (2) right of Univ. to require loyalty oath or disclaimer affidavit as prerequisite to speech; (3) right of students to listen. Pending.

Jack G. Day, Esq., 1738 Standard Bldg., Cleveland, Ohio.

25. On Miscellaneous Activities

25.10. Smith v. Cremins. (SD Cal., #53-61-WB.)*
25.11. In re Claude Belshaw. (Berkeley Personnel Bd.) Berkeley fireman wrote letter to local newspaper stating city officials "fooled" in voting pay increase to policemen; suspended for 30 days. Issue: freedom of expression for city employees. Pending.

Marshall W. Krause, Esq., for ACLU, 503 Market St., San Francisco; Albert M. Bendich, Esq., 2890 Telegraph Ave., Berkeley.

30. Economic Restrictions (see also 251, 261, 268, 281)

30.1. Independent Productions Corp., and I.P.C. Distributors, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc. (SD NY, Civ. #110-304)*
30.5. Wagner v. Post Office. (U.S. Post Office.)*
30.6. Eustace v. Day, Postmaster General and U.S. Civil Service Comm. (CA DC.)*
30.7. Young v. Motion Picture Assn. of America, Inc. (DC DC.)*
30.13. Turn Toward Peace v. Al Molaikan Temple. (Los Angeles Muni. Ct., #908264.)*
30.14. Fort v. Co. of Alameda. (California) (Dist. Ct. of App. 1st Dist., Div. 1, #2168.)*
40. Contempt
41. Of Federal Courts
Case note: Civil contempt order may not include absolute sentence: Cliett v. Hammonds (305 F.2d 565, 5th Cir. 1962) 47 Minn. U. 907-15.
42. Of State Courts
Case note: Refusal to answer same question on 2 appearances constitutes 2 separate and distinct criminal contempts: Matter of Second Grand Judy v. Cirillo. (188 N.E.2d 138, 237 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1963) 14 Syra. U. 670-72.
42.11. Louisiana v. Defs. (19th Jud. Dist., E. Baton Rouge Parish.)*
41.12. Re Dawley and Holt. (Cir. Ct., Hopewell, Va.)*
42.13. Re Selby and Taylor. (Pa. Sup. Ct., ##235, 236.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 92. July 15, 1963: Pa. Sup. Ct. reversed convictions.

John R. McConnell and Arthur Littleton, Esqs., 2107 Fidelity-Phila. Trust Bldg., Philadelphia.

42.14. Johnson v. Virginia. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 92. Cite: 373 U.S. 61.
42.15. George v. Clemmons. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 93. Cite: 373 U.S. 241.
43. Of Other Agencies (see also 270s, 330s)
50. Criminal Sanctions
51. Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses (see also 55, 541, 542, 551, 552)

51.8. Storey v. Davis. (Cook Co. Super. Ct., #60 S 9228.)*
51.19. South Carolina v. Carras, Stradley. (Sumter Muni. Ct.)*
51.25. Louisiana v. Rev. Cox. (La. Sup. Ct., ##46395, 46396.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 5. Petition for rehearing pending.

Johnnie A. Jones, Esq., 530 So. 13 St. and Murphy W. Bell, Esq., 971 So. 13th St., both of Baton Rouge; Robert F. Collins, Nils R. Douglas and Lolis E. Elie, Esqs., 2211 Dryades St., New Orleans.

- 123 -

51.27. South Carolina v. Randolph. (Sumter.) (Sumter Co. Cir. Ct.)*

Read 51.34-51.36 as part of summary of Southwest Georgia cases at 55.37.

51.34. Georgia v. Forman. (Albany Recorder's Ct.)*
51.35. Georgia v. Patch. (Albany Recorder's Ct.)*
51.36. City of Albany v. Rev. Anderson. (Albany Recorder's Ct.)*
51.37. Mississippi v. Block. (Greenwood.) (Co. Ct.)*
51.39. City of Athens, Ga. v. 5 Defs. (City Ct., Juv. Ct.) Negro woman complained of 5 Negro pickets urging her not to shop at downtown store being boycotted by Movement. Arrested: threatening another person, disorderly conduct. Pending.
51.40. Connecticut v. Petty. (Cir. Ct., App. Div.) (24 Conn. Supp. 337.) 4 CORE members sat-in at offices of Rep. and Demo. town comm. chairmen in protest on housing ordinance. Convicted. Issues: absence of evidence of disorderly conduct; vagueness of statute as applied. Petition for cert. to U.S.S.C. pending.

Catherine G. Roraback, Esq., 185 Church St., New Haven.

51.41. New York v. 15 Defs. (Rochester Co. Ct.) 2 policemen investigating report that gun was seen at Black Muslim meeting allegedly attacked by 15 Muslims. Charges: rioting, 3d degree assault. After trial, hung jury. Defs. free on bond pending new trial in Sept.

Harold G. Ashworth, Esq., 612 Wilder Bldg.; Louis J. Piccaretto, Esq., 45 Exchange St., both of Rochester, N.Y.

52. Against Obscenity (see also 12, 14)
Summary re "Tropic of Cancer" cases at 14.


Louisiana obscenity statute and freedom of speech and press. 23 La. U. 604-09.

Prurient interest as a guide to the state courts, 39 N. Dakota U. 308-22.

Case notes: Comparison evidence inadmissible to establish community standards under "hard core pornography" test: People v. Finkelstein (183 N.E.2d 661, 229 N.Y.S.2d 367; cert. denied, 83 Sup. Ct. 116, 1962) 76 Harv. 1498-1501; 12 DePaul 337-42.

52.20. U.S. v. Frew. (ED Mich.)*
52.22. Massachusetts v. Spiegel. (Cambridge Dist. Ct.)*
52.23. California v. Aday. (Dist. Ct. of App.)*
52.34. New York v. Mishkin. (N.Y. Ct. of App.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 93. Appeal pending.
52.35. Larkin v. G.I. Distributors, Inc. (N.Y. App. Div.) (175 N.E.2d 681.) Dec. 1960: Pl.-NYC Police Commr. obtained temporary show cause order restraining 6 distributors, 10 publishers, 124 distributing agents from selling 50 allegedly obscene magazines. May 1961: App. Div. held ex parte stay against distribution of publications not authorized, upheld temporary injunction. Dec. 1961: Sup. Ct. dismissed complaint, held magazines not obscene. June 21, 1963: App. affirmed (4-1).
52.35a. G.I. Distributors, Inc. v. Murphy. (ED N.Y.) 1963: Action by Defs. in 52.35 against NYC Police Commr., Queens Co. Dist. Atty., assistants and police, under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and 28 U.S.C. §1343, to recover damages for illegal search and for injunction against Defs'. threatened acts of interference with paper back books alleged to be obscene. Aug. 30, 1963: DC denied motion to dismiss.

Osmond K. Fraenkel, Esq., 120 Broadway, NYC.

52.37. Tralins v. Gerstein. (formerly Gerstein v. "Pleasure Was My Business".) (U.S.S.C., #246.)*
52.40. Massachusetts v. Interstate News Dealers Supply Co. (Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct.) (1963 Mass. Adv. Sheets 925.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6. Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct. reversed and remanded.
52.42. California v. Shaver. (San Mateo Super. Ct.)*
52.44. California v. Bradley Smith. (U.S.S.C., #72.) (Cert. granted: 373 U.S. 901.)*
52.47. U.S. v. Wilmot Enterprises. (DC N.H., #6601.)*
52.48. Connecticut v. Huntington. (Conn. Sup. Ct. of Errors, #5454.)*
52.49. California v. McGilvery. (San Diego Muni. Ct., #M-11466.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6. Def. acquitted after trial.
52.51. McCauley v. "Tropic of Cancer". (Wis. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 6, 71, 93. Cite: 121 NW2d 545.
52.53. Whitney v. San Francisco Municipal Court. (Calif. Sup. Ct., SF #21120.)*
52.54. South Carolina v. Ravenell. (Gen. Sess. Ct., Dorchester Co.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 93. No further action planned. Def's. parents lost home and taxicab business, left S.C.
52.55. Chicago v. Russell, Compton. (Cook Co. Cir. Ct.)*
52.56. U.S. v. Ginzburg. (ED Pa., #21367 Cr.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 93. After trial, Def. convicted on 28 counts of mailing obscene literature; "Eros", "Documentary Books", "Liaison Newsletter" also convicted. Bail $10,000. Pending appeal.
52.57. Chicago v. Bruce. (Chicago Muni. Ct.)*
52.58. New York v. 3 Booksellers. (N.Y. Ct. of App.) Jy. 11, 1963: N.Y. Ct. of App. (4-3) held "Tropic of Cancer" obscene, ordered new trial for Defs. to ascertain their knowledge of book's contents. Aug. 23: Onongada Dist. Atty. moved to dismiss charges, granted.
53. Against Defamation (see also 61)

53.4. Louisiana v. Moore. (19th Jud. Dist., E. Baton Rouge Parish.)*
53.5. Louisiana v. Cox. (19th Jud. Dist., E. Baton Rouge.)*
54. Against Sedition, Criminal Anarchy (see also 241-44)

54.2. Louisiana v. Goldfinch. (New Orleans.) (Orleans Parish Ct.)*
- 124 -

54.3. Diamond v. Louisiana. (U.S.S.C., #100.) (Cert. granted: 373 U.S. 931.)*
54.4. Louisiana v. Moore and Rougeau. (19th Jud. Dist. Ct., E. Baton Rouge Parish.)


54.5. Louisiana v. Zellner and McDew. (19th Jud. Dist. Ct., E. Baton Rouge Parish, #42916.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7. Charges against 4 Defs. proscribed under La. statute requiring prosecution within 1 yr.; cases closed.

Read 54.6-54.7 as part of summary of Southwest Georgia cases at 55.37.

54.6. Georgia v. Perdew, Harris, Allen. (Americus Justice of Peace.) Summer 1963: SNCC workers marched from church in Negro neighborhood. Three blocks from church stood and sang freedom songs. Police beat demonstrators, arrested Defs. Charges: unlawful assembly, resisting arrest, assault with intent to commit murder (conspiracy charge), inciting to riot. Defs. also charged with attempting to incite insurrection, a capital offense. (See Herndon v. Lowry (1937) 301 U.S. 242.) Defs. bound over to grand jury for hearing in Nov. Motion to set bail denied.

C. B. King, Box 1024, Albany, Ga.

And see 55.54.

54.7. Georgia v. Aleony. (Americus Justice of Peace, Sumter Co. Super. Ct.) White-CORE worker watching demonstration in 54.6, left scene holding hand of Negro girl. Arrested; charge: insurrection. Status and counsel identical to 54.6.
55. Against Picketing and Demonstrating (see also 51, 123, 541, 542, 551, 552)
(Some cases involving picketing charges are reported under the subject matter of the protest for which the picketing was conducted, e.g., against discrimination in dining places, 552.)
55.7. Tennessee v. Defs. (Madison Co. Ct.)*
55.16. Alabama v. Rev. Shuttlesworth, Rev. Phifer. (Ala. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7. Oct. 23, 1962: Ala. Ct. of App. affirmed. Dec. 30, 1962: Petition for cert. denied by Ala. Sup. Ct. "because not on transcript paper". Feb. 28, 1963: Ala. Sup. Ct. denied rehearing.
55.18. Alabama v. Dr. McNair. (Talladega.) (Cir. Ct.)*

And see Alabama v. Gray, 63.2.

55.19. Louisiana v. Moore. (La. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7. Appeal pending.
55.21. Peterson v. California. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7, 71. Pending on petition for cert.
55.24. Scott v. District of Columbia. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 7, 71, 94. Cite for cert. denied: 374 U.S. 844.
55.25. Jackson v. Allen. (Co. Ct., 1st Jud. Dist., Hinds Co., Miss., #21.)*
55.26. North Carolina v. Frinks. (Chowan Co. Super. Ct.)*
55.28. Illinois v. Tranquilli, Thomas, J. Lewis, Bridges. (Cairo.) (Justice of Peace Ct., Alexander Co. Ct.)*
55.29. City of Cairo v. 47 Defs. (Cairo Muni. Ct., ##20420-20423.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 8, 71.


55.29a. NAACP v. City of Cairo. (Alexander Co. Cir. Ct., #L-4672.) 1962: Suit for judgment declaring Ord. No. 849 unconstitutional. May 29, 1963: Stipulated that all prosecutions under Ord. 849 be dropped, no further prosecutions under Ord. will be instituted for peaceful picketing, declaratory judgment action dismissed without prejudice.

Raymond E. Harth, Esq., 109 N. Dearborn, Chicago.

55.31. Missouri v. Lewis, Dunlap, Adams, Kundra. (Charleston Muni. Ct., ##8-36-233, 8-52-249, 8-53-250, 8-55-252.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 8. Aug. 28, 1962: Defs. fined $10.-$25. plus costs, 30 days—fines and jail suspended on payment of costs, conditioned on good behavior. Sept. 4, 1962: Def. Dunlap held in contempt for violating conditions of release: 25 days; served 14, paid $11., released.
55.32. Crawford, Mitchell, Poole, Salter v. Mississippi. (CA 5.)*
55.34. Montgomery Ward v. CORE. (Alameda Co. Super. Ct., #332499.) May 28, 1963: Pl. sued for damages and injunction against picketing to protest discrimination in Pl's. hiring policy. Suit settled by signing of agreement between CORE and Ward's, Pl. promising to implement non-discriminatory hiring policy.

Malcolm Burnstein, Esq., 1440 Broadway, Oakland; Beverly Axelrod, Esq., 345 Franklin, San Francisco.

55.34a. Barnes v. CORE. (Butte Co. Super. Ct., #40296.) Aug. 1963: Suit filed on facts similar to 55.34. Aug. 9, 1963: Super Ct. granted temporary restraining order. Aug. 16, 1963: Ct. dissolved order on Defs. motion, refused to issue preliminary injunction. Pending.

Malcolm Burnstein, Esq., 1440 Broadway, Oakland.

* * *


Over 1,000 arrests were made in Danville between June 5 and Aug. 27, 1963 of Negroes seeking 5 objectives: desegregation of all public facilities and those private facilities open to the public; equal job opportunities in public and private employment; establishment of official bi-racial commission; appointment of Negro representatives on all City bds. and commissions. In order to present a complete picture of civil rights litigation in a typical, active area of the south, all Danville cases are included in this category, except denial of unemployment compensation to demonstrators (Lewis, 263.5) and police brutality (Thomas, 304.28.)

May 31, 1963: first demonstration, with permit from Mayor. June 5: after daily demonstrations, first arrests as Corporation Ct. judge sought to disperse demonstrators. June 6: Corp. Ct. issued ex parte temporary restraining order. June 7: 3 Negro leaders indicted for inciting Negroes to riot against whites under state felony statute. June 14: City Council passed ordinance codifying broadly restrictive terms of restraining order: no one under 18 can picket; no more than 6 pickets regardless of area picketed; no picketing outside business hours. 105 arrested for violatinginjunction. June 17: Defs. filed removal petition of contempt cases to DC under 28 U.S.C. §1443. June 17: Corp. Ct. tried 2 contempt Defs. after removal petition filed; convicted; 90 days with 45 suspended, $25; no bail. June 22: 10 (including Atty. Holt) indicted under inciting to riot statute. June 24-25: DC granted petitions for habeas corpus to release 2 Defs. convicted in Corp. Ct. under 28 U.S.C. §1446.

Jy.: City Council passed anti-parade ordinance. U.S. Dept. of Justice filed amicus appearance to oppose City's motion to remand the removed cases back to Corp. Ct. Jy. 11: DC remanded to Corp. Ct. all cases removed to it by Defs. Jy 29: Corp. Ct. made temporary order permanent injunction and enlarged its scope after hearing in which prosecutor introduced evidence re alleged "Communist-inspired" demonstrations. Aug. 6-8: 347 contempt of injunction cases set for trial; Corp. Ct. granted State's motion for change of venue to remote Va. cities. Many Defs. out on multiple bonds: $500. for each charge. Aug. 8: CA 4 stayed further Corp. Ct. trials pending its decision on 5 cases pending before it:

- 125 -

55.35. Baines v. City of Danville. McGhee v. City of Danville. (CA 4, ##9080, 9082.) Defs. in 138 criminal cases charging violation of June 6 restraining order filed removal petitions to DC. Jy. 11: DC remanded back to state ct. Jy. 16: Defs. filed petition for writ of mandamus in CA 4 and appealed DC's remand order under new construction of 28 U.S.C. §1447(d) which would allow appeal from remand after removal in civil rights cases. Appeal pending.
55.36. Chase v. McCain. Chase v. Aiken. (CA 4, ##9081, 9082.) Pl.-demonstrators filed plenary suits in DC under Civil Rights Act seeking decree enjoining enforcement of June 14 ordinance, June 6 and Jy. 29 injunctions, and declaring them unconstitutional. DC denied relief for failure to exhaust state remedies and no irreparable injury shown. Appeal pending in CA 4.

Counsel in all cases: Ruth L. Harvey and Harry I. Wood, Esqs., 4535 Main St., Len W. Holt, Esq., 243 Ross St., Andrew C. Muse, Esq., Spring and Union St., J. L. Williams, Esq., 323 N. Ridge St. and George Woody, Esq., 212 N. Ridge St., all of Danville; Samuel Tucker, Esq., Southern Aid Ins. Bldg., Richmond; Arthur Kinoy and William M. Kunstler, Esqs., 511 Fifth Ave., NYC; Prof. Chester Antieau, Georgetown Law Center, 6th and E Sts., NW, and Shellie Bowers, Esq., 3429 Clay Ct., NE, both of Washington, D.C.; Richard Goodman and Dean Robb, Esqs., 3220 Cadillac Tower, Detroit.

And see 263.5 and 304.28.

* * *


Over 1,000 arrests have been made in this area since organization of the Albany Movement in 1961. In order to present a complete picture of civil rights litigation in a typical, active area of the deep south, all 1963 Albany cases are included in this category, except injunction (Anderson, 63.5); sit-ins and demonstrations at terminals (542.21a, 542.21b, 542.21c, 542.21d); insurrection (Perdew, 54.6, Aleony, 54.7); police brutality (Ware, 304.21); school integration (522.Ga.8).

C. B. King, Esq., P. O. Box 1024, Albany, Ga. is counsel in all cases. Donald Hollowell, Esq., 859½ Hunter St. NW, Atlanta, is co-counsel in some cases.

55.37. City of Albany v. Daniels, Davis, deLissovoy, Mormon. (Albany's Recorder's Ct.) 1963: arrested while walking from Negro church to downtown area. Charge: disorderly conduct. Convicted; 30 days or $102. Certiorari granted by Dougherty Co. Super. Ct. Pending.
55.38. Albany v. Wheeler. (Rec. Ct.) Arrested: parading without a permit. Released on bond. Awaiting trial.
55.39. Albany v. Bell. (Rec. Ct.) Several arrested: parading without a permit. Convicted. Appeal to Super. Ct. pending.
55.40. Albany v. Starling. (Rec. Ct.) Juvenile sat in to be served at coffee shop. Customer poured boiling hot cup of coffee on Def. Sheriff asked waitress if she wanted juvenile arrested; she said yes. Charge: loitering. Released on bond. Awaiting trial.
55.41. Albany v. Mosley, Washington. (Rec. Ct.) Kneel-in at front of white church. Arrested: loitering; released on bond. Awaiting trial.
55.42. Albany v. Brown. (Rec. Ct.) Def. taking photographs of kneel-in at church. Arrested: disorderly conduct; released on bond. Awaiting trial.
55.43. Albany v. Randolph, McCray, McCarthy. (Rec. Ct.) During demonstration in Negro neighborhood arrested: disorderly conduct; released on bond. Awaiting trial.
55.44. Albany v. Ricks. (Rec. Ct.) Negro-SNCC worker arrested for participation in outdoor mass meeting at Negro housing project. Convicted; 60 days and $200.
55.45. Georgia v. Ricks. (Dougherty Co. Super. Ct.) Def. in 55.44 charged with inciting to riot. Released on $1500. bond. Pending.
55.46. Albany v. King and Webb. (Rec. Ct.) After remand from CA 5, DC ordered public swimming pool desegregated. Pool already sold to private party, remained segregated. Negro Defs. attempted to buy tickets to pool. Convicted of loitering. Released on bond. Appeal pending to Super. Ct.
55.47. Albany v. Quartimon. (Rec. Ct.) Def. boarded bus, paid fare. When told Negroes sit in rear, Def. said she paid fare and would stay in front. Arrested: use of profanity. Convicted. Appeal pending.
55.48. Albany v. Rothstein. (Rec. Ct.) White SNCC worker tried to buy ticket to white swimming pool. Arrested: failure to obey order of police. Convicted. Appeal pending.
55.49. Albany v. Giddens, Cover, Allen. (Rec. Ct.) Defs. handing out notices of civil rights meeting. Arrested: violating ordinance prohibiting distribution of advertising matter. Convicted; 30 days or $55. Two Defs. beaten when put in jail with 6 white men. Appeal pending.
55.50. Albany v. Mann, Cade, Wender, Cohen, Stech, Rabinowitz, Blechner. (Rec. Ct.) Newly-arrived SNCC workers arrested: vagrancy. Convicted; 60 days, suspended. Appeal pending.
- 126 -

55.51. Albany v. Porter. (Rec. Ct.) Many Defs. arrested while parading; disorderly conduct. Convicted; 60 days or $102. Appeal pending.
55.52. Albany v. Washington. (Rec. Ct.) After Birmingham church bombings, Def. marched with sign in protest to downtown area. Arrested; convicted.
55.53. Albany v. Perdew. (Rec. Ct.) Def. allegedly threw brick at police car. Charges: disorderly conduct, failure to obey officer, destruction of property. Bound over to State for assault with intent to commit murder. Released on $1500. cash bond.
55.54. Georgia v. Perdew, Harris, Allen. (Rec. Ct.) Defs. in insurrection case (54.6) also held for $40,000 each in peace bonds. When citizen testifies in court that Def. threatens his life or property, Def. must post bond or rest in jail. Bond hearings await outcome of 54.6.
55.55. Georgia v. Durham and McDaniel. (Americus.) Defs. charged with unlawful assembly, resisting arrest, assault with intent to commit murder (conspiracy charge), inciting to riot. Def. McDaniel allegedly threw rock at police car. His bond: $20,000. In jail pending trial.
55.56. Americus v. Wiggins, Merrit, Brown. (Rec. Ct.) Defs. charged with violating newly-passed city ordinance limiting picketing to 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Convicted; 30 days or $102. Appeal to Sumter Co. Super Ct. pending.
55.57. Americus v. Goober. (Rec. Ct.) Negroes stood in at white window of theater and tried to buy tickets. Charge: blocking the sidewalk. Convicted: 30 days or $102. Appeal pending.
55.58. Americus v. Newsome. (Rec. Ct.) 19 Defs. charged with loitering and resisting arrest at theater. Convicted. 30 days or $102.
55.59. Americus v. Wilbur and Moran. (Rec. Ct.) Loitering at theater; convicted; 30 days or $102.
55.60. Americus v. Daniels. (Rec. Ct.) One Negro girl accused of insulting another. Girl wearing SNCC pin arrested for disorderly conduct. (Standard fine: 7 days or $15.) SNCC worker got maximum sentence: 30 days.
55.61. Americus v. Stephens. (Rec. Ct.) Jy. 19: 11 Defs. stood in at movie; arrested: loitering. In jail til Sept. 3rd trial; convicted. 30 days or $102.
55.62. Americus v. 20 Defendants. (Rec. Ct.) Kneel-in at police station. Convicted.
55.63. Americus v. 48 Defendants. (Rec. Ct.) During march from church to police station to protest arrest of Harris, 54.6, police and citizens charged demonstrators. Children 12 to 19 yrs. old and 67 yr. old man beaten; one youth needed 22 stitches; several others had to have stitches; one had broken leg. Girls' bodies covered with burns from cattle prodders. Jail conditions: lack of ventilation, no operable toilets, no sanitary conditions, no mattresses. Pending trial.
55.64. Americus v. 35 Defendants. (Rec. Ct.) Aug. 18, 1963: On march uptown from Negro neighborhood arrested. Convicted.
55.65. Georgia v. Mary Moss. (Fitzgerald Recorder's Ct.) Integration worker held for 3 peace bonds; 2 dropped. Appeal on one pending in Ben Hill Co. Super. Ct.
55.66. Mayor's Court of Fitzgerald v. Mary Moss. (Mayor's Ct.) 29 arrested at sit-in at public library. Released on bond.
55.67. U.S. v. Anderson. (MD Ga., Albany Div.) April 1963: all-white fedl. petit jury ruled for Def.-Sheriff in suit by Negro-Pl. under Civil Rights Act for damages to Pl's. shoulder from 3 shots by Def. while arresting Pl. for public drunkenness (misdemeanor). (Ware, 304.21). Albany Movement picketed store of white juror Smith with store in Negro community; store closed. Aug. 9, 1963: 3 Negro leaders of Albany Movement (see summary at 55.) indicted by fedl. grand jury for injuring fedl. petit juror and conspiring to so injure by means of picketing, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§1503, 371. Defs. allege picketing done solely to urge Smith to hire Negro help and treat Negro customers properly. Defs. released on $2500. to $5000. bond. Pending.

C. B. King, Esq., P. O. Box 1024, Albany, Ga.; Donald Hollowell, Esq., 859½ Hunter St. NW, Atlanta, Ga.

And see Rabinowitz, 55.68.

55.68. U.S. v. Rabinowitz. (MD Ga., Macon Div., ##8107-8113.) 5 Negro Defs. and 1 white Def., all active in Albany voter registration work, indicted by fedl. grand jury for perjury before grand jury as to witnessing picket line against juror Smith's store (see Anderson, 55.67) and re attendance at alleged meeting in Atty. King's office (in King's absence) day before grand jury appearances. Papers filed: (1) subpena duces tecum to U.S. Atty. for matter obtained during grand jury investigation; (2) bill of particulars re events surrounding grand jury hearing; and motions: (3) to permit inspection of grand jury minutes; (4) to transfer trial of northern white SNCC worker (with supporting affidavits from profs. expert in race relations on probability of her obtaining fair trial in south); (5) to dismiss indictment—(a) improper jury selection for systematic exclusion of Negroes: (b) unauthorized person present in grand jury room when Def. called; (c) U.S. Atty. improperly inflamed jurors against white Def.; (d) alleged false testimony not on material matter, Def. not apprised of purpose of investigation; (e) offenses charged as separate counts actually all same, resulting in double jeopardy. Defs. released on $2500. bond. Pending.

Victor Rabinowitz, Esq., 30 E. 42nd St., NYC; C. B. King, Esq., P. O. Box 1024, Albany, Ga.

56. Against "Corrupt Practices"

56.4. Alabama v. Mills. (Ala. Sup. Ct., #6 Div. 950.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 94. Under submission.

Kenneth Perrine, Esq., Bank for Savings Bldg., Birmingham.

Amicus appearances by James C. Barton and Charles Morgan, Jr., Esqs., Bk. for Svgs. Bldg., Birmingham.

57. Against Vagrancy

57.3. Louisiana v. Trumpower. (E. Baton Rouge Crim. Dist. Ct.)*
57.4. Georgia v. Sherrod and Allen. (Dawson.)*
- 127 -

57.5. Mississippi v. Rev. A. Jones. (Jackson.) (Hinds Co. Ct.)*
57.7. Alabama v. Zellner. (Montgomery.) (15th Jud. Cir., Ala., #948.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 72. Charges nol prossed.
57.9. California v. Sandness, Hill. (San Francisco Muni. Ct., ##H34752, H34753). June 3, 1963: Defs. arrested under statute (Calif. Penal Code §647(a)(2)) for "loitering" in area "normally used by school children and parents with small children", a public park. July 22, 1963: Muni. Ct. held vagrancy ordinance unconstitutional as too broad, vague, and indefinite, and violative of due process. Appeal by State pending.

Marshall W. Krause, Esq., 503 Market St., San Francisco, for ACLU of N. Calif.

58. Against Trespassing (see also 541, 542, 551, 552)

58.1. California v. Poland and Cage. (U.S.S.C., #21 Misc.)*
58.2. Delaware v. Anderson, Livingston. (Kent Co. Ct. of Com. Pleas.)*
58.3. Alabama v. Zellner. (Talladega.) (Intermediate Ct., #3599.)*

And see 63.2

58.4. Maryland v. Grubb. (Cambridge.)*
58.6. Alabama v. Student Defs. (Huntsville.) (Ala. Ct. of App.)*
59. Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities
See cases at 123.
59.22. North Carolina v. Crowder, Covington, Lowry, Reape, Mallory. (Union Co. Super. Ct., U.S.S.C.) (173 O.S. 536.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 9, 72, 95. Trial delayed pending extradition proceedings of Mallory in U.S.S.C. July 19, 1963: Petition for cert. filed.

Amicus appearance by Ohio Civil Liberties Union by Ralph Rudd, Esq., 75 Public Square Bldg., Cleveland.

59.22b. North Carolina v. R. Covington. (Union Co. Super. Ct.)*
59.26. Mississippi v. Bevel. (Jackson.) (Hinds Co. Ct.)*
59.27. Mississippi v. Aaron Henry. (Clarksdale.) (Cir. Ct.)*
59.27a. Mississippi v. Aaron Henry. (Miss. Sup. Ct.)*
59.28. Kentucky v. Pfuhl and Duffey. (Louisville City Ct.)*
59.31. U.S. v. Gibson. (ED Ky.) June 17, 1963: Defs., Kentucky miners, arrested on charges of violating federal train wreck statute (conspiracy to blow up R.R. bridge). Defs. freed on bail. Def.-Stacey turned State's evidence. Trial: Oct. 28.

Paul O'Dwyer, Esq., 40 Wall St., I. Philip Sipser, Esq., 50 Broadway, both of NYC; Dan Jack Combs, Esq., Pikeville, Ky.

Committee for Miners, 96 Greenwich Ave., NYC.

60. Civil Sanctions
61. Against Defamation

Defamatory remarks on television held to be "defamacast" and actionable per se: 16 Vand. 472-75; American U. 222-28.

Absolute privilege in Tennessee, 30 Tenn. U. 397-407.

Case notes:

Defamation by TV broadcast is actionable per se: American Broadcasting-Paramount Theaters, Inc. v. Simpson (26 S.E.2d 873, Ga. 1962) 46 Marquette 397-400; 1 Houston 58-60.

Campaign pamphlet allegedly inferring communist sympathy held non-defamatory: Corman v. Blanchard (27 Cal. Rptr. 327, Dist. Ct. App. 1962), 14 Syracuse 694-97.

Libel per se se doctrine: Venn v. Tennessean Newspapers, Inc. (201 F. Supp. 47, M.D. Tenn. 1962), 30 Tenn. U. 466-74.

61.9. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. (U.S.S.C., #39.)*
61.9a. Commr. James v. The New York Times, Rev. Shuttlesworth, et al. (Montgomery Cir. Ct.)*
61.9b. Commr. Parks and Patterson v. The New York Times. (U.S.S.C., #52.) (308 F.2d 474.)*
61.10. Gov. Patterson v. The New York Ttimes, Rev. King, Shuttlesworth, et al. (Montgomery Co. Ct.)*
61.11. The New York Times v. Connor and Bessemer City Commrs. (CA 5, #19781.)*
61.16. Barton v. Gov. Barnett. (Hinds Co. Cir. Ct., #16,525.)*
61.17. Franklin v. Paradise American Legion Post 259. (Butte Co. Super. Ct., Calif., ##39103, 39906.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10.

Robert Hoffman, Esq., 179 E. 6th St., Chico, Calif.

61.18. Pauling v. Anti-Communist League of York Co. (MD Pa., #7940.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 95.*

James E. O'Brien, Esq., Scranton Life Bldg., Scranton, Pa.; Henry W. Sawyer III, David W. Maxey, Esqs., 1100 Phila. Natl. Bank Bldg., Philadelphia.

61.18a. Pauling v. National Review. (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)*
61.18b. Pauling v. News Syndicate Co. Inc. (CA 2.)*
61.18d. Pauling v. St. Louis Globe-Democrat. (ED Mo., E. Div. #61 C 312.)*
61.19. Brent v. Singlemann, Citizen's Council of New Orleans. (SD La.) June, 1963: Pls.-faculty members at La. State Univ. filed suit charging they had been held up to "disrepute, ridicule and contempt" in statements made by Def. after they signed petition protesting "Americanism" program broadcast on TV station owned by school system. Pending.
62. By Injunction in Labor Disputes
63. By Injunction in Other Situations
And see cases at 204.
63.2. Alabama ex rel. Atty. Genl. Gallion v. Gray. (Talladega Co. Cir. Ct., #9760.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10, 72. Jy. 1, 1963: Ct. dismissed Talladega faculty as parties, permanently enjoined all others from doing or conspiring to do unlawful acts: street parades, demonstrating, boycotts, trespassing, assembling, picketing in City. Appeal pending.
- 128 -

63.3. Mitnick d/b/a Central Fourth St. Drugstore v. Fair Share Organization. (Ind. App. Ct., Div. 2, ##19741, 20018.) (188 NE.2d 840.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10. Mar. 19, 1963: App. Ct. affirmed granting of injunction, held picketing unlawful because purpose to obtain replacement of white employees by Negroes a violation of state public policy in F.E.P. Act.
63.4. B & B Cash Grocery Stores, Inc. v. Young Adults for Progressive Action. (Cir. Ct., 13th Jud. Cir., Hillsborough Co., Fla., Ch. #124971-C.)*
63.5. Kelley v. Page. (Albany.) (MD Ga., #727.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10, 72-3. DC denied injunction asked by city; City's appeal pending.


Anderson v. City of Albany. (CA 5, #20501.) (8 RRLR 192.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10, 72-3. Jy. 26, 1963: CA 5 reversed and remanded to DC to issue injunction. DC did issue injunction against enforcement of segregation ordinances. City's motion for full bench hearing pending.


Anderson v. City of Albany. (MD Ga., #731.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 10, 72-3. DC denied Pls.' requested injunction against interference with peaceful desegregation picketing. Pls'. appeal pending.

63.6. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Wash. Chap. of CORE. (DC DC, #3238-62.)*
64. Against Miscellaneous Activities
70. Procedural Problems
71. In Alleging Standing to Sue
72. In Raising and Preserving Constitutional Questions
90. Miscellaneous Freedom of Thought

90.2. Westlake Subdivision Improvement Assn. v. Klein. (San Mateo Super. Ct., #94100.)*
110. Separation of Church and State
111. In Education
Law review articles:

Joseph G. Schumb, Jr., Religion in the public schools. 3 Santa Clara U. 135-52.

Paul G. Kauper, Prayer, public schools and the Supreme Court. 61 Mich. U. 1069.

Comment: Establishment of religion—a New York school prayer. 28 Mo. U. 109-20.

111.6. School Dist. of Abington Township, Pa. v. Schempp. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 11. Cite: 374 U.S. 203. Je. 17, 1963: U.S.S.C. (8-1) affirmed Schempp, reversed Murray, per Clark, J.: held religious exercises conducted by state supported schools are violative of First Amendment (which applies to states through 14th Amendment): "Nor are these required exercises mitigated by the fact that individual students may absent themselves upon parental request, for that fact furnishes no defense to a claim of unconstitutionality under the Establishment Clause." . . . "While the Free Exercise Clause . . . prohibits the use of state action to deny the rights of free exercise to anyone, it has never meant that a majority could use the machinery of the State to practice its beliefs." Douglas, J. and Brennan, J. conc.; Stewart, J. diss.
111.8. Engel v. Vitale. (370 U.S. 421.) Facts: VII DOCKET 105.

Case note: 61 Michigan U. 1069-86.

111.10. Chamberlin and Resnick v. Miami and Dade Co. Bds. of Educ. (U.S.S.C.) (347 U.S. 487.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 11, 96. U.S.S.C. vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Murray, 111.22 and Schempp, 111.6.
111.20. Brown v. Orange Co. Bd. of Pub. Inst. (Fla. Sup. Ct., #31, 102.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 11, 96. Fla. Sup. Ct., per curiam, affirmed July 17, 1963, binding ct. to U.S.S.C. decisions in Murray and Schempp, 111.22 and 111.6.
111.22. Murray v. Curlett, Baltimore School Bd. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12, 73, 96. Cite: 374 U.S. 203. Decided with Schempp, 111.6.
111.23. Polster v. Centennial Joint School Bd. (Bucks Co., Pa. Super. Ct. #M 1 (1962).*
111.26. Re Five Pupils. (N.J. State Educ. Comm.) May 17, 1963: Pupils-Negro followers of "Islamic teachings" suspended from school for periods ranging up to 3 mths. for failure to salute flag; contend that to salute flag contrary to their "Islamic teachings." Pupils reinstated by N.J. Educ. Commissioner; decision awaited.
112. In Public Places

112.25. Co. of Los Angeles and Bethlehem Star Parade Assn. v. Hollinger. (Dist. Ct. App., 2nd Dist., #26868.)*

Case note:

Child who denied belief in God ruled competent witness: State v. Walton (179 A.2d 78, Middlesex Co. 1962) 38 Notre Dame 95 - 99.

120. Conscientious Objection to War
121. Through Application for C. O. Status

121.26. Harshman v. U.S. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12, 73, 96. Cite: 372 U.S. 607.
121.27. U.S. v. Parker (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12, 73, 96, Cite: 372 U.S. 608.
121.28. U.S. v. N.J. Harshman. (ND Ill.)*
122. Through Refusal to Register
123. Through Civil Disobedience

123.24. U.S. v. Henry Foster. (ND Calif., N. Div., #13468.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 12. DC granted U.S. Atty's motion to dismiss.
- 129 -

123.26. Council v. Donovan, NYC Supt. of Schools. (Kings Co. Sup. Ct., #3496/1963.)*
123.27. McCaffrey v. N.Y.C. Bd. of Educ. (Kings Co. Super Ct.) Pl. fired as a teacher for refusal to lead pupils through Civil Defense shelter drill. Pending.
130. Denial of Tax Exemption to Institutions (see also 202, 266)
140. Sunday Closing Laws
Comment: The constitutionality of Sabbatarian exemptions. 43 Boston U. 386-95.
140.31. Sherbert v. Verner. (U.S.S.C. (125 SE.2d 737.) Pl.-Seventh day Adventist fired for refusal to work on Sat., her Sabbath; unable to find work not requiring Sats.; denied unemployment compensation for failing, "without good cause, to accept suitable work." Com. Pleas Ct. sustained Commission's findings; S.C. Sup. Ct. affirmed. Je. 17, 1963: U.S.S.C. (7-2) reversed and remanded, Brennan, J.: No answer that compensation merely a privilege—"It is too late in the day to doubt that the liberties of religion and expression may be infringed by the denial or placing of conditions upon a benefit or privilege"; under balancing doctrine, no overriding state interest shown. Douglas, J. conc. Stewart, J. conc. Harlan, J. (White, J.) diss.
150. Miscellaneous Restrictions
151. In Prisons
And see cases at 304.
151.2. Pierce v. Warden LaVallee. (Dannemora.) (ND NY.) (212 F.Supp. 865) (8 R.R.L.R. 44). Facts: VIII DOCKET 13, 97. May 11, 1962: on remand DC dismissed; held Pls. punished to maintain prison order not for religious beliefs.
151.4. Sewell v. Pegelow. (ED Va.)*
151.5. Bratcher v. McGinnis. (Attica State Prison.) (WD NY, #9398.)*
152. In Other Places

152.5. Dawud and Dakota Staton v. Muhammad and Muhammad's Temple of Islam. (ED Pa., #21,367.)*
200. Organizational Privileges Challenged
201. As to Meetings (see also 11, 63)
202. As to Tax Exemption (see also 130, 266)

202.4. U.S. v. Communist Party, Hall, Flynn, Davis, Bart. (SD N.Y.)*

And see 202.4a.

202.4a. Communist Party v. Commr. of Internal Revenue. (CA DC.)*
202.5. Re Revocation of Exemption of Fellowship of Reconciliation. (Int. Rev. Serv.)*
203. As to N.L.R.B. Certification (see also 245, 291)
Law review article: Thomas G. S. Christensen, Free speech, propaganda and the National Labor Relations Act. 38 N.Y.U. 243-79.
203.3. U.S. v. R. Dennis. (DC Colo. #15124 Crim.)*

George J. Francis, Esq., Farmers Union Bldg., Denver, Colo.; Nathan Witt, Esq., P.O. Box 156, NYC.

204. As to Continued Existence (see also 63, 213, 223)

204.1. Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. NAACP. (U.S.S.C., #169.) (150 So.2d 677.)*
204.4. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Button. (ED Va., #2436.)*
204.4b. NAACP Legal Defense Fund v. Gray (formerly v. Button.) (Richmond Cir. Ct., #B-2879.)*
204.4c. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar v. NAACP, NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund, Inc., Va. State Conf. of Branches, NAACP. (Richmond Chancery Ct., #503.)*
204.8. Arkansas ex rel. Atty. Genl. v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund. (Ark. Sup. Ct.)


204.9. Arkansas ex rel. Atty. Genl. v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund. (Ark. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 14. Je. 3, 1963: Ark. Sup. Ct. (5-2) held unconstitutional Act 12 (requiring certain organizations to furnish information to Co. Cts. re activities on education); Act 13 (empowering Atty. Genl. to seize organizational files); Act 14 (defining barratry and making it unlawful); Act 16 (making it unlawful to solicit or donate money for school integration suits.)

George Howard, Esq., 329½ Main St., Pine Bluff, Ark.

210. Compulsory Registration
211. Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act

A suggested approach to the bill of attainder clause, 72 Yale 331-67.

Communist registration and the Fifth Amendment, 15 U. Florida 435-56.

211.1a.. U.S. v. Communist Party. (CA DC.)*
211.1b-1c. U.S. v. Hall and Davis. (DC DC, Cr. ##228-62, 229-62.)*
211.1d-1m. Albertson, Friedlander, Johnson, Patterson, Tormey, Weinstock, Healey, Lima, Nelson, Proctor, Lightfoot, Davis, Kushner, Hall v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)*
211.1n-1t. Kennedy v. Taylor, Dobbs, Stanford, L. Libson, Gabow, A. Libson, Tormey. (S.A.C.B.)*
211.2. Jefferson School v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC).*
211.5. Civil Rights Congress v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)*
- 130 -

211.6. Washington Pension Union v. S.A.C.B. (formerly listed as Kennedy v. Washington Pension Union.) (CA DC, #15197.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 15, 74. June 6, 1963: CA found organization defunct, dismissed its petition for review.
211.8. California Labor School in San Francisco v. S.A.C.B. (S.A. C.B.)*
211.9. Am. Comm. for Protection of Foreign Born v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC, #15,960.)*
211.10. Kennedy v. California Emergency Defense Committee. (S.A.C.B.)*
211.13. Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC, #13,174.)*
211.14. United May Day Comm. v. S.A.C.B. (CA DC.)*
211.15. Kennedy v. Advance. (S.A.C.B.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 74. Hearing date: Sept. 9, 1963.

Mary Kaufman, Esq., 303 W. 66th St., NYC, for Emergency Civil Liberties Comm.

212. Under 1954 Communist Control Act

212.1. Kennedy v. Intl. Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers. (S.A.C.B.) (CA DC, #17,135.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 16, 74. Aug. 9, 1963: Bd. dismissed Def.'s redetermination petition for failure to make prima facie case. Original case pending in CA on Def.'s petition for review.
213. Under State Laws (see also 204)
220. Listing
221. By the Attorney General of the United States
222. By Congressional Committees
And see cases at 271.

Law review article: Carl A. Auerbach, Some comments on the case for the House un-American Activities Committee. 47 Minn. U. 593-603.

222.1. Wheeldin v. Wheeler. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 16, 74, 98. Cite: 373 U.S. 647.
223. By State Authorities (see also 24, 281)

223.3. Elfbrandt v. Russell, Arizona Gov. Fannin. *
240. Criminal Penalties for Membership
241. Under Smith Act: for Conspiracy
242. Under Smith Act: for Mere Membership
243. Under 18 U.S.C. 2384
244. Under Kennedy-Landrum-Griffin Act (29 U.S.C. 504) (See also 203, 291)

244.1. U.S. v. Brown. (CA 9.)*
245. Under State Laws (see also 54)

245.15. Indiana v. Levitt, Bingham, Morgan. (Monroe Co. Cir Ct., #601.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 98. Case dismissed but Defs. re-indicted.

Leonard Boudin, 30 E. 42nd St., N.Y.C., for Emergency Civil Liberties Comm.

246. Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act

246.1. U.S. v. Robels. (WD Wash. N. Div., #50,676). Facts: VIII DOCKET 99. Def. moved to dismiss: failure to allege Communist Party a Communist action organization as defined in Act; statute violates First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, is bill of attainder. Argument pending.
250. Civil Disabilities for Membership: Federal
251. In Federal Employment (see also 30, 268)

251.15. Dew v. Halaby. (U.S.S.C.) (317 F.2d 582.)*
251.52. Garrott v. U.S. (U.S. Ct. of Claims, #19-63.)*

See cases at 30.5, 30.6.

251.53. In re Loletta Leary. (U.S. Civ. Serv. Comm.) Pet. denied interest on deceased husband's annuity because of his false denial of Communist Party membership made prior to passage of 5 U.S.C. 2284. Issues same as Garrott, 251.52. Pending.

Hal Witt, Esq., 600 F St., NW, Washington, D.C.

252. As to Passport Applications and Right to Travel

252.27a. Worthy v. U.S. (CA 5, #20062.)*
252.33. Elizabeth Gurley Flynn v. Secy. of State Rusk. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 75, 99. Jy. 12, 1963: 3-judge ct. upheld constitutionality of statute; dismissed complaint. Appeal pending.
252.34. Aptheker v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC, #3886-62.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 75, 99. Status same as Flynn, 252.33.
252.35. Zemel v. Rusk and Kennedy. (DC Conn, #9549).*
252.36. MacEwan v. Rusk and Kennedy. (ED Pa., #33038.)*
252.54. U.S. v. Steadman, Bonello, Zahn. (CA 9.)*
252.55. Copeland v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 99. Oct. 1, 1963: argument before 3-judge ct.
252.56. Mayer v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC, #1034-63 Civ.)*
252.57. Jerome v. Secy. of State Rusk. (DC DC). Facts: VIII DOCKET 99. Passport granted. Case closed.
253. As to Army Discharges (see also 341)
254. As to Veterans Disability Payments

254.2. Thompson v. Gleason. (formerly Thompson v. Whittier.) (DC DC.) (317 F.2d 901.)
255. As to Social Security Benefits (see also 263, 346)
See Heikkila, 358.51.
256. In Housing Projects
- 131 -

257. As to Federal License Applications

257.6. Halaby, Admr., Fed'l. Aviation Agency v. Susemihl. (Fedl. Aviation Agency.)*
257.7. Blumenthal v. F.C.C. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 99. Cite for cert denied: 373 U.S. 951.
258. Through Deportation Proceedings (see also 358)

258.7. Wolf v. Boyd (Imm. Serv.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 18, 99. Remanded to administrative level for reconsideration in light of Gastelum-Quinones, 258.9.
258.9. Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy. (U.S.S.C., ##39, 293.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 18. Je. 17, 1963: U.S.S.C. (5-4) reversed, Goldberg, J.: Under Galvan (1954) 347 U.S. 522, and Rowoldt, 258.1, 355 U.S. 115, Gov't. has burden of proving deportee was "meaningful member" of Communist Party aware of its "distinct ... nature"; "we cannot sustain Pet's. deportation upon a bare inference ... derived from Pet's. failure to introduce evidence in response to the Gov't's. proof of his dues-paying membership [1949-50] and sometimes attendance at Party meetings." White, J. (Clark, Harlan, Stewart, JJ.) diss.
259. Through Denaturalization and Naturalization Proceedings (see also 358)

259.52. Sittler v. U.S. (CA 2.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 99. Cite: 316 F.2d 312.
260. Civil Disabilities for Membership: State, Local and Private
261. In State or Local Government Employment

261.1. Wilkins v. Carlander, et al. (Super. Ct. Kings Co., #490844.)*
262. In Teaching (see also 24, 267, 281 and 342)

262.5. Golden, Detwyler and Mahin, Norman and Boyd v. Ky. State College. (ED Ky., Frankfort Div., ##197-199.)*
262.9. Bd. of Trustees, Fullerton Jr. College v. Phillips. (Dist. Ct. of App.)*
263. As to State Unemployment Insurance Benefits (see also 255, 346)

263.5. Lewis v. Bennett. (CA 4, #9083.) More than 11 Negro demonstrators in Danville (see summary at 55.) filed suit in DC seeking injunctive relief against denial of unemployment compensation benefits solely because Pls. participated in demonstrations. DC denied relief for failure to exhaust state remedies and to prove irreparable injury. Appeal pending.

Counsel listed at Danville summary, 55.36.

264. As to State License Applications
265. In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants (see also 345, 373)
Comment: Procedural due process and character hearings for bar applicants. 15 Stanford 500-17.
265.28. Willner v. Comm. on Character and Fitness. (U.S.S.C., #995.) (218 NYS.2d 597, 182 NE.2d 288, 183 NE.2d 86.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 19. May 13, 1963: U.S.S.C. (7-2) reversed, Douglas, J.: "where, as here, the Appellate Division has held no hearings of its own to determine an applicant's character, the role of the [Def.] Committee is more than that of a mere investigator.... Petitioner was clearly entitled to notice of and a hearing on the grounds for his rejection either before the Comm. or before the Appellate Division...." Goldberg, J. (Brennan and Stewart, JJ.) concur. Harlan, J. (Clark, J.) diss.
266. Through Deprivation of Right to Tax Exemption (see also 130, 202)
267. In Private Employment—Teaching (see also 24, 262, 281 and 342)
268. In Private Employment — Defense Establishments (see also 344)
And see Robels, 246.1.
268.1a. Graham v. Richmond. (CA DC.)*
268.7. Kreznar v. Wilson (DC DC.)*
268.18. Margolin v. U.S. (U.S. Ct. of Claims.)*
269. In Private Employment — Other

269.1. Faulk v. AWARE. (App. Div., N.Y. Sup. Ct., #708.)*
270. Criminal Penalties for Non-disclosure (see also 330)
271. Before Congressional Committees (see also 222, 330)

271.9. U.S. v. Russell. (DC DC.)*
271.12. U.S. v. Gojack. (DC DC.)*
271.15. U.S. v. Shelton. (CA DC.)*
271.16. U.S. v. Whitman. (DC DC.)*
271.19. U.S. v. Price. (DC DC.)*
271.20. U.S. v. Liveright. (DC DC.) Facts. VIII DOCKET 21. Trial date: Nov. 11, 1963.
271.27. U.S. v. Hartman. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 76, 100. Gov't filed appeal in CA 9, which ordered appeal certified to U.S.S.C. under 18 U.S.C. §3731. Sept. 16, 1963: Gov't. dropped appeal; case closed.
271.28. U.S. v. Grumman. (DC DC.)*
271.29. U.S. v. Silber. (DC DC.)*
271.33. Yellin v. U.S. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 21. June 17, 1963: U.S.S.C. (5-4) reversed, Warren, C.J.: House Un-American Activities Comm. Rule IV re executive sessions
- 132 -

(1) was written to protect witnesses, (2) requires Comm. to consider injury to witness' reputation in deciding for or against executive session, (3) requires Comm. to reply to witness' request for executive session, not staff director. HUAC here did not obey its rule. "Pet. has no traditional remedy, such as the writ of habeas corpus ... by which to redress the loss of ... rights. If the Comm. ignores his request for an executive session, it is highly improbable that Pet. could obtain an injuction against the Comm. that would protect him from public exposure. ... To answer the question put to him publicly and then seek redress is no answer. For one thing, his testimony will cause the injury he seeks to avoid; ... For another, he has no opportunity to recover in damages. ... Even the Fifth Amendment is not sufficient protection, since Pet. could say many things which would discredit him without subjecting himself to the risk of criminal prosecution. The only avenue open is that which Pet. actually took. He refused to testify. ... It is not too exacting to require that the Comm. be ... meticulous in obeying its own rules." White, J. (Clark, Harlan, Stewart, JJ.) diss.
271.34. U.S. v. Lehrer. (ND Ind.)*
271.35. U.S. v. Malis (ND Ind.)*
271.36. U.S. v. Samter. (ND Ind.)*
271.40. U.S. v. O'Connor. (ND N.J.)*
271.47. U.S. v. Tobin. (306 F.2d 270.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 21.

Case note: 31 Geo. Wash. 842-50.

272. Before State Committees (see also 204, 213, 332)
Book: Willard Uphaus, Commitment. McGraw-Hill, $4.95.
272.4a. In Matter of Investigation by Comm. on Offenses Against Administration of Justice. (Va. Sup. Ct. of App.)*
272.12. Jordan v. Hutcheson. (CA 4.)

Case Note: 111 U. Penn. 995-1000.

273. Before Legal and Administrative Tribunals (see also 333)
274. For Refusal to Produce Records
280. Civil Penalties for Non-disclosure
281. By Teachers (see also 24, 223, 262, 342)

281.1a. Baggett v. Bullitt. (formerly v. Odegaard). (U. of Washington.) (U.S.S.C., #220.)*
281.5b. Re Nash, et al (N.Y. Commr. of Educ.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 22. Commr. sustained decision of Bd. of Educ. dismissing 2, reinstating 4.
281.16. Macks v. Calif. Bd. of Educ. (Dist. Ct. of App.)*
282. By Others (see also 343, 344)
290. Penalties for False Disclosure
291. Under Taft-Hartley Oath (see also 203, 245)
292. On Government Security Questionnaires

292.2. Ogden v. U.S. (CA 9.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 23, 76. June 5, 1963: Argued and submitted.
293. In Miscellaneous Cases

293.3. Los Angeles Bd. of Educ. v. Sloat. (Los Angeles Super. Ct., #794678.)*
295. Right of Privacy

295.4. Hall v. Graybill. (Los Angeles Co. Super. Ct.)*

300. Searches and Seizures
Law review articles:

Lester B. Orfield, Privileges in federal criminal evidence. 40 U. of Det. 403-31.

Charles A. Reich, Midnight welfare searches and the Social Security Act. 72 Yale 1347-60.

Gene Haislip, Judicial reaction to evidence obtained by harsh and unusual means. 4 Wm. & Mary 1-18.


Reaffirmation of confessions inadmissible under McNabb-Mallory. 72 Yale 1434-58.

Return and execution of warrants — use of trickery by federal officers. 8 S.D. 127-34.

Search and seizure in California: Consent. 3 S. Calif. 180-82.

Case notes:

Telecommunications officer conducting lawful search can impersonate "bookie" in answering telephone and testify as to conversation of gambler without violating Fourth Amendment or the Federal Communications Act. N.J. v. Carvone (183 A.2d 1, 1962), 1 Houston 43-46.

Clandestine police surveillance of public toilet booth held to be unreasonable search: Bielicki v. Superior Court (57 Cal.2d 602, 371 P.2d 288, 1962), 63 Columbia 955-61.

Search incident to arrest for misdemeanor not in presence of officer unreasonable, 27 Albany U. 295-300.

301. By Wiretapping
Law review article: Aubrey Gasque, Wiretapping: A history of fedl. legislation and Supreme Court decisions. 15 S.C. Univ. 593-623.
301.16. Washington v. Cory. (Wash. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 24. Wash. Sup. Ct. reversed conviction, ordered case dis-missed; held eavesdropping on attorney-client conference by police requires dismissal of prosecution.
301.20. U.S. v. Sen. Harris. (ED La., Baton Rouge Div., ##1422-1424.)*
- 133 -

301.22. Dinan v. New York. (183 NE.2d 689.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 24.

Case note: 11 Kansas U. 563-65.

302. In Other Federal Criminal Cases
Law review article: Lester B. Orfield, Admission and exclusion of evidence in fedl. criminal cases. 41 Texas U. 617-62.
302.19. Hall v. Warden. (313 F.2d 483.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 46.

Case notes: 39 N. Dak. U. 360-62, 5 Ariz. U. 118-24.

302.22. U.S. v. Wallace (CA 5.)*
303. In Other State Criminal Cases
Comment: Search and seizure incident to traffic violations. 14 Hastings 459-64.
303.28. Massachusetts v. Dorius. (Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 77. 1963: Sup. Jud. Ct. reversed conviction, ordered Def. discharged.
303.38. Kentucky v. Mitchell. (355 SW.2d 686.) Facts: VII DOCKET 111. Case note: 51 Ky. U. 566-69.
303.42. Ker v. California (U.S.S.C.) (15 Cal. Rprtr. 767.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 25. Je. 10, 1963: U.S.S.C. (5-4) affirmed, Clark, J.: "the demands of our fedl. system compel us to distinguish between evidence ... inadmissible because of our supervisory powers over fedl. cts. and ... inadmissable because prohibited by [U.S. Constitution]"; Defs.' arrests legal under state law; on examination by U.S.S.C., held search was incident to lawful arrest and method of entering home by stealth and without warning Defs. not offensive to fedl. standards. Harlan, J., conc. in result. Brennan, J. (Warren, C.J., Douglas, Goldberg, JJ.), diss.: "But where the conduct effecting an arrest so clearly transgresses those rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment as [here], we would surely reverse ... if this were a fedl. prosecution involving fedl. officers. Since ... Mapp has made the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment coextensive with those of the Fourth we should pronounce precisely the same judgment upon the conduct of these state officers."

Robert W. Stanley, Esq., 132 W. First, Los Angeles.

303.43. New York v. Randazzo. (NY Sup. Ct., 1st Jud Dist.)*
304. Suits for False Arrest, Police Brutality (see also 580 and 151)

304.1. Prof. Genovese v. N.Y.C. (N.Y. Co. Sup. Ct.)*
304.2. Hallowell v. N.Y.C. (NYC Comptroller, #155363.)*
304.3. Massey v. NYC Police Commr. (Queens Co. Ct.)*
304.4. Jackson v. City of New York. (NYC Comptroller.)*
304.5. Richichi v. Bielski. (Ill. Ct. of App.)*
304.6. Monroe v. Pape and City of Chicago. (ND Ill., E. Div., #596329.)*
304.7. Swanson v. McGuire, et al. (ND Ill., #57-C-1164.)*
304.8. Duble v. Brown and Chicago. (Cook Co. Super Ct., #60 S 19040.)*
304.8a. Duble v. Brown and Chicago. (ND Ill., E. Div., 61 C 1404.)*
304.9. Cedeno, et al v. Lichenstein. (ND Ill., #58-C-1712.)*
304.10. Gonzales v. Genl. Investigators Inc. (ND Ill., #60 C 1806.)*
304.11. Dean v. Smith and Chicago. (Cook Co. Cir. Ct., #58 C 12494.)*
304.12. Cunningham v. Stried and Rygiel. (Lake Co. Cir. Ct.)*
304.13. Wirin v. Hilden. (SD Calif.)*
304.14. Goldberger v. Lewis. (San Francisco Super. Ct.)*
304.16. Lucero v. Donovan, Carnover. (SD Calif.)*
304.17. Rev. Morris v. Capt. Ray. (CA 5.)*
304.18. Rev. Jones v. Teasley. (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 27. Preliminary question of reduction of appeal bond from $37,500. pending.
304.19. Nesmith v. Alford. (MD Ala.) (318 F.2d 110.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 27, 102. Aug. 15, 1963: CA 4 denied Def.'s petition for rehearing.
304.20. Horn v. Baillie, Greenwood and U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. (CA 9, #5319.)*
304.21. Ware v. Johnson. (MD Ga., Albany Div., #749.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 71, 102. Motion for new trial pending.

And see Anderson, 55.67, Rabinowitz, 55.68.

304.22. Brazier v. Cherry. (MD Ga., Americus Div., #475.)*
304.24. Harkins and Frankfort v. NYC. (Brooklyn Sup. Ct.)*
304.25. California v. Imbler; In re Imbler. (Calif. Sup. Ct., ##6699, 7212 Cr.)*
304.26. Green v. Azzam. (ED Mich., E. Div., #23224.)*
304.27. Duzynski v. Nosal. (CA 7, #14088.)*
304.28. Thomas v. McCain. (WD Va.) June 24, 1963: Pl.-Negro demonstrator testified in Corporation Ct. that Def.-Danville police chief and policeman beat her in parking lot between jail and municipal bldg., broke her nose. Jy. 5, 1963: Pl. sued for damages. Pending.
304.29. Antelope v. George. (DC Ida., N. Div.) (211 F. Supp. 657.) Aug. 6, 1961: Pl.-American Indian arrested without warrant, charged with breach of peace, never prosecuted. 1961: Pl. filed suit for damages under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Dec. 13, 1962: DC held for Pl.—$500 damages.
304.30. Williams v. Clinton. (WD Wash., N. Div., #5997-Civ.) Aug. 4, 1963: Pl.-Negro allegedly beaten by police officers at his home, arrested as drunk: acquitted. Aug. 9, 1963: Pl. filed suit against Def.-police officers, Mayor, seeking $40,000 damages. Pending.

Philip L. Burton, Esq., 917 Logan Bldg., Seattle, Wash.

- 134 -

310. Indictment
311. Challenge to Composition of Grand Jury (see also 510s)

311.2. Beck v. Washington. (369 U.S. 541.) Facts: VII DOCKET 111. Case Note: 111 U. of Pa. 1000-05.
312. Attacks on Character of Evidence
Case Notes:

Use of planted informer to extract imcriminating admissions: U.S. v. LaVallee (206 F. Supp. 679, N.D.N.Y. 1962), 16 Okla. U. 188-91.

Waiver of right to claim denial of due process in cases involving perjured testimony: Illinois v. Lueck, 12 DePaul 308-13.

313. Charge of Entrapment
Comment: Illinois v. Toler (185 N.E.2d 874, 1962), 65 Va. U. 223-26.

Case Note: Fedl. gov't's. unexplained use of informers on contingent fee basis to produce evidence against specified persons as to crimes not yet committeed constitutes entrapment: Williamson v. U.S. (311 F.2d 441, 5th Cir. 1962), 49 Va. U. 2021-25.

314. Charge of Conspiracy
See Gibson, 59.31.
315. Inspection of Pre-Trial Statements of Government Witnesses
(Including Jencks point, 353 U.S. 357, and Jencks Act, 18 USC 3500.)

Case notes: Right of prosecution to pre-trial discovery: Jones v. Superior Court (372 P.2d 919). 61 Mich. U. 987-94, 15 Stanford 700-07.

316. Inspection of Grand Jury Minutes
Comment: 111 U. of Pa. 1154-96.
320. Double Jeopardy
321. In Federal Cases
322. In State Cases
330. Self-incrimination: Criminal Sanctions for Exercising Privilege (see also 270)
331. Before Congressional Committees
332. Before State Committees
333. Before Grand Juries and Tribunals
334. Grants of Immunity: Federal

334.7. Shotwell Mfg. Co. v. U.S. (371 U.S. 341.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 78. Case Note: 27 Albany U. 300-04.
335. Grants of Immunity: State
336. Criminal Registration Laws
And see 1950 Internal Security Act, 211.
337. Miscellaneous
340. Self-incrimination: Civil Sanctions for Exercising Privilege (see also 280)
341. Effect on Army Discharges (see also 253)
342. Effect on Employment — Public School Teachers (see also 262, 267, 281)

342.4a. Mass v. San Francisco Bd. of Educ. (Calif. Dist. Ct. of App., 1st Dist., Div. 3, #21,330.)*
343. Effect on Employment — Other Public Officers (see also 261)
344. Effect on Employment — Private (see also 30, 268, 269)

344.6. United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local 610 v. Westinghouse Airbrake Co. (Allegheny Co. Ct. of Common Pleas, #3132.)*
345. Effect on Attorneys (see also 265, 373)
346. Effect on Unemployment Insurance and Social Security (see also 263)
And see Heikkila, 358.51.
350. Due Process
Case Notes:

Co-Def's. right to comment on Def's. failure to testify: De Luna v. U.S. (308 F. 2nd 140, 5th Cir. 1962). 15 Stanford 690-99.

Detention occasioned by suspicion cannot supply requisite probable cause for arrest: N.Y. v. Diaz (232 N.Y.S.2d 208, Ct. Spec. Sess. 1962). 14 Syracuse U. 505-08.

351. In Arraignment (Delay)
352. In Grand Jury Procedures (see also 311, 316)

352.2. Re Roland E. Thompson. (CA 2, #28073.) Jan. 21, 1963: Def. failed to appear in DC in response to fedl. grand jury subpoena since he was living in Philippines; held in contempt, $50,000 fine. June, 1963: CA held (2-1) that foreign resident cannot be required to return from abroad in response to grand jury subpoena, quashed contempt charge.

Havens, Wandless, Stitt & Tighe, Esqs., 60 E. 42nd St., NYC.

353. In Obtaining Confessions
Article: Frank H. Way, Jr., The Supreme Court and state coerced confessions. 12 J. of P.L. 53-67.

Case Notes: Admissibility of subsequent confession under McNabb-Mallory doctrine: Killough v. U.S. (315 F.2d 241, DC Cir. 1962). 61 Mich. U. 1364-69, 31 Geo. Wash. 855-60.

353.16. Lynumn v. Illinois. (U.S.S.C., #9.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 29, 103. Cite: 372 U.S. 528.
353.19. Missouri v, Cookson. (Mo. Sup. Ct. #49,202.)*
- 135 -

353.20. Pate v. Oklahoma. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 29, 78, 104. Cite for cert. denied: 373 U.S. 915.
353.21. Ralph v. Pepersack, Warden. (CA 4.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 78. July 1, 1963: DC denied habeas corpus; Pets. appeal pending.
353.22. Davis v. North Carolina. (ED N.C., Raleigh Div., #1302.)*
353.23. Colman v. Denno. (SD NY.)*
353.24. Haynes v. Washington. (U.S.S.C.) (364 P. 2d 935.) 1957: Def. arrested; charge of robbery. On evening of arrest, Def. asked for permission to call wife and lawyer; police said he could if he confessed. Def. was not advised by police of right to remain silent and to consult atty. 17 hrs. after his arrest, Def. signed written confession. 5-7 days after arrest he refused to sign a second confession. At trial, first confession introduced over Def's. objection; convicted. Wash. Sup. Ct. (5-4) affirmed. May 27, 1963: U.S.S.C. (5-4) vacated and remanded. Goldberg, J.: "Confronted with the express threat of continued incommunicado detention and induced by the promise of communication with and access to family [Def.] understandably chose to make and sign the damning written statement; given the unfair and inherently coercive context in which made, that choice cannot be said to be the voluntary product of a free and unconstrained will, as required by the Fourteenth Amendment." Clark, J. (Harlan, Stewart, White, JJ.) diss.

Lawrence Speiser, Esq., D.C. ACLU, 1101 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, D.C.

354. In Press Releases and Newspaper Coverage
Law review article: Hubert L. Will, Free press vs. free trial. 12 DePaul 197-216.

Comment: The two forums of a criminal trial: The courtroom and the press. 14 Syracuse U. 450-71.

354.3. Rideau v. Louisiana. (U.S.S.C.) (137 So. 2d 283.) Feb. 16, 1961: Man robbed bank, kidnapped 3 bank employees, killed 1. Def. arrested hours later. Feb. 17: 20 min. moving picture with sound track made of interview in jail between Sheriff and Def., with Def. confessing all crimes. Feb. 17-19: film shown on TV 3 times to 97,000 out of 150,000 parish population. Mar. 1961: Trial Ct. denied Def's. motion for change of venue; convicted; death sentence. La. Sup. Ct. affirmed. June 3, 1963: U.S.S.C. (7-2) reversed, Stewart, J.: "The case now before us does not involve physical brutality. The kangaroo court proceedings . . . involved a more subtle but no less real deprivation of due process of law. . . . The people of . . . Parish saw and heard . . . a 'trial' of [Def.] in a jail, presided over by a sheriff, where there was no lawyer to advise Rideau of his right to stand mute." Clark, J. (Harlan, J.) diss.

Fred H. Sievert, Jr., Esq., Lake Charles, La.

355. In Admitting Perjured Testimony (see also 312)

355.4. Sobell v. U.S. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 30, 104. Cite for cert. denied: 374 U.S. 857.
356. In Courts Martial (see also 390)
357. In Naturalization Proceedings (see also 259)
358. In Expatriation, Denaturalization and Deportation Proceedings (see also 258, 259)
Comment: Congressional power to render American citizens stateless. 48 Iowa U. 815-32.
358.20. Re Albert Gallo. (Imm. & Nat. Serv., Spec. Inquiry Officer.)*
358.22. Woo Tai King v. Holton, Dist. Dir. (ND Cal., S. Div.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 31, 79. Imm. Serv. started proceedings to cancel certificate of citizenship under new regulation on basis of fraud. Pending.
358.23. Schneider v. Rusk. (U.S.S.C.)*
358.24. Ting v. Immigration Service. (ED Pa., #32424.)*
358.51. Heikkila v. Celebrezze. (ND Cal., S. Div.)*
358.59. U.S. ex rel. Marks v. Esperdy. (CA 2.)*
358.60. Marcello v. Kennedy. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 31, 79, 194. May 27, 1963: U.S.S.C. denied cert.
358.a. U.S. v. Dear Kai Gay. (ND Cal.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 31, 79. On remand for resentencing, Def. granted probation; $200. fine.
359. In Loyalty Hearings (see also 251 and 268)

359.2. Scott v. Macy. (DC DC, #1050-63 Civ.) 1963: Pl.-17 year employee of Dept. of Labor removed from civil service appointment list on ground of homosexuality. Pl. sued for reinstatement, alleging: (1) no showing of immoral conduct, (2) finding unrelated to qualifications for fedl. employment. Pending.

David Carliner, Esq., 902 Warner Bldg., Washington, D.C., for National Capital Area CLU.

360. Speedy and Public Trial
Booklet: Know your rights—arrest, detention, trial. Los Angeles, Hollywood-Beverly Hills Chapters, National Lawyers Guild, 3175 W. 6th St., Los Angeles.
370. Right to Counsel
Law review articles:

Dale E. Bennett, Right to counsel—A due process requirement. 23 La. U. 662-72.

Elliot E. Cheatham, A lawyer when needed: Legal services for the middle classes. 63 Columbia 973-86.

Case Note: Right to counsel—time for taking appeal: Boruff v. U.S. (310 F.2d 918, 5th Cir. 1962). 37 Tulane 563-64.

371. In Federal Cases
Case notes:

The right to counsel: U.S. v. Massiah (307 F.2d 62, 2d Cir. 1962). 15 Stanford 530-38.

Denial of effective aid of counsel violates Fourteenth Amendment: Brubaker v. Dickson (310 F.2d 30, 9th Cir. 1962.) 27 Albany U. 291-95.

371.5. Jamison v. Chappell. (U.S.S.C.) (318 F.2d 225.)*
- 136 -

372. In State Cases

372.20. Pennsylvania ex rel. Simon v. Maroney. (U.S.S.C., #41 Misc.)*
372.21. New York v. Coe. (Oneida Co. Ct., #113608.)*

And see cases at 452.

372.23. Hazel v. Pepersack, Warden. (MD., #13781; Balt. City Sup. Bench.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 79. July 23, 1963: New trial ordered.
372.24. New York v. Mawbey. (Washington, NY Co. Ct., #6203A, Cr 699.)*
372.25. Smith v. Mississippi. (U.S.S.C., #374 Misc.)*
372.26. Simon v. Maroney. (U.S.S.C.)*
372.27. Walton v. Arkansas. (Ark. Sup. Ct.)*
372.28. White v. Maryland. (U.S.S.C.) (177 A.2d 877.) May 27, 1960: Def. arrested. May 31: brought before magistrate. Aug. 9, 1960: preliminary hearing; Def. without a lawyer, pleaded guilty. Sept. 9: arraignment postponed, counsel appointed. Nov. 25: araignment; pleaded "not guilty" and "not guilty by reason of insanity". At trial, Aug. 9 guilty plea introduced in evidence. Def. convicted, death sentence. Md. Ct. of App. affirmed. Apr. 29, 1963: U.S.S.C., per curiam, reversed: Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52, governs; entering a plea is a "critical" stage requiring counsel.

Fred E. Weisgal, Esq., Baltimore.

373. Indirect Restrictions (see also 265, 345)

373.13. U.S. v. Taylor. (CA 4.)*
373.15. Re William Higgs. (Jackson, Miss. Chancery Ct.) July 15, 1963: Def.-white civil rights attorney (see 373.14) disbarred on recommendation of Hinds County Bar Assn. for making "some completely false statements under oath." Def. not present.
374. Opportunity for Appellate Review
Case Note: Indigent Def's. right to transcript: U.S. ex rel. Weston v. Sigler (308 F.2d 946, 5th Cir. 1962, cert. den.) 37 Tulane 544-48.

Comment: Indigent Def's. rights on appeal in N.Y. 29 Brooklyn U. 261-85.

374.20. Norvell v. Illinois. (U.S.S.C.) (182 NE.2d 719.) 1941: Indigent-Def., represented by counsel, convicted in murdertrial; 199 yrs. Def. could not afford transcript; did not appeal. After U.S.S.C. decision in Griffin (1956) 351 U.S. 12, Ill. Sup. Ct. adopted Rule 65-1: State to provide free trial transcript to every indigent Def. convicted of crime before or after Griffin where not impossible. 1956: Def. moved trial Ct. for transcript. 1941 Ct. reporter dead; impossible to reconstruct transcript. Ct. denied petition for new trial. Ill. Sup. Ct. affirmed. May 27, 1963: U.S.S.C. (7-2) affirmed, Douglas, J.: ". . . . where transcripts are no longer available, Ill. may rest on the presumption that he who had a lawyer at the trial had one who could protect his rights on appeal." Harlan, J., conc. Goldberg, J. (Stewart, J.) diss.

Thomas P. Sullivan, Esq., Elmhurst, Ill.

380. Confrontation
381. In Criminal Cases

381.4. California v. Davenport. (Cal. Sup. Ct.)*
382. In Civil Cases
390. Jury Trials (see also 356, 510)
400. Excessive Bail; Parole Conditions
401. Amount of Bail

401.4. Fernandez v. U.S. (CA 9.)*
401.5. Lambert v. Florida. (Fla. Dist. Ct. of App.)*
401.6. Minnesota v. Mastrian. (Minn. Sup. Ct.) (122 NW.2d 621) 1963: Def. indicted for murder, bail set at $100,000; Def. applied for reduction in trial ct., contending amount set unusual and excessive, denied. On appeal, Minn. Sup. Ct. held against Def.: Def. had to show trial ct. abused discretion to extent of violating constitutional rights; listed factors to be considered by trial ct. in setting bail: (1) seriousness of offense, (2) severity of punishment if found guilty, (3) ability to provide bail in amount less than that set but adequate to meet minimal requirements of situation, (4) circumstances pointing to likelihood of appearance if released, including relationship to community at time of arrest and circumstances of apprehension.
402. Conditions Imposed

402.6. U.S. v. Dumeur. (DC N.Y.)*
403. Denial of Bail
410. Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Comment: The effect of state statutes on civil rights of convicts. 47 Minnesota U. 853.
411. In Criminal Cases

411.11. Winston v. U.S. (ED N.Y.)*
411.13. Cobb v. Georgia. (Ga. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 33, 81, 106. Appeal pending from state court denial of motion for new trial.
411.19. Fleishour v. U.S., Fedl. Bureau of Prisons, Assoc. Warden, Stringfellow. (ND Ill., E. Div., #62-C-2270.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 81. U.S. withdrew motion to dismiss; trial pending.
411.20. Delaware v. Cannon. (U.S.S.C.)*
411.21. Virginia v. Wansley. (Va. Sup. Ct. of App.)*
411.22. Delaware v. Balser. (Dela. Sup. Ct.)*
412. In Extradition Cases
413. In Civil Cases
See Mallory, 59.22.
- 137 -

430. Due Process for Juvenile Offenders

430.3. Benj. Harris v. Kennedy. (DC DC, #2111-62.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 34. Pl's. motion to dismiss granted.
440. Due Process for Incompetent Defendants

440.1. New York v. Codarre. (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept.)*
450. Post-Conviction Remedies
451. In State Courts in State Cases
452. In Federal Courts in State Cases
Law review article: Willard D. Lorenson. The new scope of fedl. habeas corpus for state prisoners. 65 West Va. U. 253-62.

Case Note: Requirement of exhaustion of state remedies before issuance of writ limited to state of detention: U.S. ex rel. LaNear v. LaVallee (306 F.2d 417, 2d Cir. 1962). 1963 Duke 374-79.

452.6. Townsend v. Sain. (ND Ill., E. Div.)*
453. In Federal Cases
Comment: Timely appeals and fedl. criminal procedure. 49 Va. U. 971-95.
453.1. Sanders v. U.S. (U.S.S.C., #202.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 107. Cite: 373 U.S. 1.
460. Sentencing and Clemency Procedures
Case Notes:

Def. does not have right of access to confidential documents used in determining sentence: Morgan v. Florida (142 So.2d 308). 5 Arizona U. 127-30.

Due process requirements and admitting evidence of subsequent crimes re sentence: Iowa v. Kelley (115 N.W.2d 184, 1962). 48 Iowa U. 1038-44.

461. Sentencing Process

461.2. Wood v. Denna. (CA 2.)*
461.3. Rudolph v. Alabama. (Ala. Sup. Ct.) (8 R.R.L.R. 245) 1961: Def.-Negro convicted of rape; death penalty. Def.

alleged on appeal that death sentence for rape applied unequally in Negro man-white woman situation and white man situation. Jan. 17, 1963: Ala. Sup. Ct. aff'd., holding reported cases do not show the existence of the alleged discrimination in sentencing. Pending.

462. Applications for Probation
463. Applications for Parole
Comment: Parole: A critique of its legal foundations and conditions. 38 N.Y.U. 702-39.
464. Applications for Pardons or Executive Clemency
465. Applications for Expungement or Certificates of Rehabilitation
490. Miscellaneous Due Process
Comment: Constitutionality of state statutes prohibiting dissemination of birth control information. 23 La. U. 773-78.
490.4a. Pauling v. McNamara, U.S. Secy. of Def. (CA DC.)*

Amicus appearance by Marie S. Klooz, Esq., 2223 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C., for Austrian Pacifist Union, German Peace Organization, German Branch of League for Human Rights, Opponents of Atomic Damage, Organization of Conscientious Objectors, Saar Friends of Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Lambaréné, Membership Organization of the War Resistors International, Austrian Branch of the Intl. War Opponents, Berlin Zehlendorf Branch of World Parliament for World Culture (World Cultural Council).

490.6d. Connecticut v. Griswold and Buxton. (Conn. Sup. Ct.)*
490.21. In re Martin. (374 P.2d 801.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 36, 83. Case Note: 23 Md. U. 282-83.
490.22. Sills v. Gotthilf. (U.S.S.C., #50.)*

Law review article: Robert E. Maxwell, Civil Rights and West Virginia: A centennial study. 37 St. Johns 201-59.

Pamphlet: The civil rights crisis: A synopsis of recent developments, II. July 26, 1963. Southern Regional Council, 5 Forsyth St., N.W., Atlanta.

500. Elections
501. Racial Discrimination

501.Ala.2. U.S. v. Registrar and Alabama. (Macon Co.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 37, 83, 108. Cite: 371 U.S. 37.
501.Ala.6. U.S. v. Penton, Registrars. (Montgomery Co.) (MD Ala., #1741-N.)*
501.Ala.9. U.S. v. Mayton and Alabama. (Perry Co.) (CA 5.)*
501.Ala.10. U.S. v. Bd. of Registrars, Jefferson Co. (ND Ala., S. Div., #CA64-367.) July 31, 1963: Suit filed under 42 U.S.C. 1971, 1971(d), 1971(c), 28 U.S.C. 1345, seeking finding that Defs. are guilty of discrimination in voter registration, and permanent injunction. Pl. challenges 1901 Ala. Const. §182 disqualifying from voting: idiots, and those convicted of such crimes as malfeasance in office, subornation of perjury, robbery, forgery, assault and battery on wife, bigamy, miscegenation, any infamous crime or crimes involving moral turpitude, vagrancy, buying or offering to buy votes. Pending.
501.Ga.2. U.S. v. Raines. (Terrell Co.) (MD Ga., Americus, #442.)*
501.Ga.2a. U.S. v. Matthews and Chapell. (Terrell and Sumter Cos.) (MD Ga. Americus Div., #516.)*
501.La.1b. U.S. v. Citizens Council, Lucky and Louisiana. (Ouachita Parish.) (WD La.)*
501.La.2. U.S. v. Thomas, Registrars of Washington Parish, and White Citizens Council. (Bogalusa.) (WD La. #9146.)*
- 138 -

501.La.6a. U.S. v. Manning. (E. Carroll Parish.) (WD La., Monroe, Shreveport Divs., #8257.) (215 F. Supp. 272, 8 RRLR 136.)*
501.La.7. Anderson v. Martin. (U.S.S.C., #684.)*
501.La.8. U.S. v. Fox and Louisiana. (Plaquemines Parish.) (ED La., #11625.)*
501.La.9. U.S. v. Registrar, and Louisiana. (Madison Parish.) (WD La.)*
501.La.10. U.S. v. Wilder, Registrar, and Louisiana. (Jackson Parish.) (WD La.)*
501.La.11. U.S. v. Louisiana. (ED La., Baton Rouge Div., #2548.)*
501.Miss.1a. U.S. v. Daniel, Registrar, and Mississippi. (Jefferson Davis Co.) (SD Miss., Hattiesburg Div., #1655.) (8 RRLR 154.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 38. Jan. 4, 1963: DC, after trial, denied injunction to Pl. on ground it believes that Def.-registrar will comply with all instructions ct. may give. DC instructed Registrar to register all qualified persons.
501.Miss.2. U.S. v. Registrar and Mississippi. (Panola Co.) (SD Miss., #3312.)*
501.Miss.3. U.S. v. Ramsey, Registrar, and Mississippi. (Clarke Co.) (CA 5.) (8 RRLR 156.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 38. Feb. 5, 1963: DC dismissed action as to Mississippi, found Def.-Registrar (82-yrs. old) had discriminated against some qualified Negro applicants; found office to be run in a very loose manner: "It is complained that Negroes were given harder tests than white people ... that ... is not one of the faults of this Registrar." Def. enjoined from discriminating against Negroes in administering tests. Defs.' appeal to CA 5 pending.
501.Miss.4. U.S. v. Wood, Registrar, and Mississippi. (Walthall Co.) (SD Miss., Hattiesburg Div., #1656.)*
501.Miss.4a. U.S. v. Wood. (Walthall Co.) (SD Miss., Hattiesburg Div., #1656.)*
501.Miss.5a. Re Theron C. Lynd, Registrar. (Forrest Co.) (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 39. Def. convicted of civil contempt; criminal contempt charge deferred, pending U.S.S.C. decision on jury trial in such proceedings.
501.Miss.6. U.S. v. Green, Cir. Clk., and Mississippi. (George Co.) (SD Miss., #2540.)*

And see U.S. v. Bd. of Educ., 571.12.

501.Miss.7. Kennedy v. Lewis, Cir. Clk. and Registrar. (Boliver Co.) (CA 5.)*
501.Miss.8. U.S. v. Dogan. (Tallahatchie Co.) (ND Miss., Delta Div., #D-C-53-61.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 39. Jan. 29, 1963: DC granted Pl's. motion for preliminary injunction. Trial pending.
501.Miss.9. Higgs v. Kennedy and Hoover. (DC DC.)*
501.Miss.10. U.S. v. City of Greenwood. (ND Miss., Greenville Div., #GC638.)*
501.Miss.11. U.S. v. Sheriff Edwards. (Rankin Co.) (SD Miss., Jackson Div., #3413.)*
501.Miss.12. U.S. v. Ashford, Registrar (Hinds Co.) and Mississippi. (SD Miss., #3457.) Pl. seeks reopening of registration books for voting. Pending.
501.NY.1a. Camacho v. Kennedy. (SD NY, #60-Civ.-3531.)*
501.NC.1. Ivy v. Cole, Registrar. (Halifax Co., N.C.) (ED N.C., Wilson Div., #610-Civ.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 39. July 9, 1963: Consent judgment entered, case closed.
503. Urban Discrimination
Note: The number of malapportionment cases now pending makes it impossible to cover each case in detail in the DOCKET, since the factual and legal issues are not identical. All pending cases on which facts are available will be listed by title, docket no., court, names and addresses of counsel. The most significant will be described in greater detail. Watch action by state legislatures in 1964 sessions and reports by Natl. Municipal League, 47 E. 68th St., NYC.

Book: Selected Bibliography on Legislative Apportionment and Districting. National Municipal League. 51 pp. $1.50.

Law review articles: Allan L. Clem, Problems of measuring and achieving equality of representation in state legislatures. 42 Neb. U. 622-41.

Alan A. Clem, Guidelines for solving the representation riddle. 8 South Dakota U. 109-16.

Comment: The Supreme Court's first essay in the "political thicket". 14 Mercer 401-11.

503.Ala.1. Frink v. Sims. (U.S.S.C., ##508, 540, 610.)*
503.Ala.2. Alsup v. Mayhall. (U.S.S.C.)*
503.Ala.3. Reynolds v. Sims. (U.S.S.C.)*
503.Calif.2. Yorty v. Anderson. (Calif. Sup. Ct., #7455.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 109. Aug. 20, 1963: Calif. Sup. Ct. denied reapportionment.
503.Calif.3. Silver v. Jordan. (SD Calif., Cent. Div., #62-953-MC.)*
503.Calif.4. Mutnick v. Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County. (Super. Ct., Contra Costa Co., #88406.)*

And see 503.Calif.5.

503.Calif.5. Griffin v. Bd. of Supers., Monterey Co. (Calif. Sup. Ct.) 1962: Pl. brought suit seeking reapportionment of supervisorial districts, unchanged in 77 yrs. Sept. 20, 1963: Calif. Sup. Ct. unanimously ordered Defs. to reapportion districts to make them "nearly equal in number of electros."
503.Colo.1. Stein v. General Assembly. (Colo. Sup. Ct.) (374 P.2.d. 66.)*
503.Colo.2. Lisco v. McNichols. (DC Colo., #7501.)*
503.Colo.3. Ryan v. Tinsley. (DC Colo.)*
503.Colo.5. Re Legislative Apportionment. (Colo. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Conn.1. Butterworth v. Dempsey. (DC Conn., #9571.)*
503.Conn.2. Valenti v. Dempsey. (DC Conn., #9544.)*
- 139 -

503.Dela.1. Sincock v. Terry. (U.S.S.C.)*
503.Dela.2. Roman v. Sincock. (U.S.S.C., #307.)*
503.Fla.1. Lund v. Mathas. (Fla. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Fla.2. Sobel v. Adams. (U.S.S.C.)*
503.Ga.1. Helmsley v. Wells. (SD Ga., ##1203, 1204.)*
503.Ga.2. Sanders v. Gray. (DC Ga.)*
503.Ga.3. Wesberry v. Sanders. (U.S.S.C., #507.)*
503.Ga.4. Toombs v. Fortson. (ND Ga. Atlanta Div., #7872.)*
503.Ida.2. Hearne v. Smylie. (DC Ida., S. Div.)*
503.Ill.1. Germano v. Kerner. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 109. July 30, 1963: DC upheld (2-1) 1954 State constitutional amendment giving downstate Illinois permanent control of State Senate. Pl's. petition for cert. pending.
503.Ind.2. Stout v. Hendricks. (SD Ind., #1 P61-C-236.)*
503.Ind.3. Grills v. Welsh. (Sup. Ct. Marion Co., #S59-600.)*
503.Ia.2. Davis v. Synhorst. (SD Ia., Cent. Div.)*
503.Kan.1. Harris v. Shanahan. (Kan. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Kan.2. Meeks v. Anderson. (DC Kan., #KC, 1774.)*
503.Ky.1. Schmied v. Combs. (WD Ky., #4380.)*
503.Ky.2. Combs v. Matthews. (Franklin Cir. Ct.) (364 SW.2d __.)*
503.La.1. Daniel v. Davis. (ED La.)*
503.Md.1. Maryland Comm. for Fair Representation v. Tawes. (U.S.S.C., #554.)*

Comment: State reapportionment—The Maryland experience. 31 Geo. Wasington 812-37.

503.Mass.1. Fishman v. Secretary of the Commonwealth. (Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct., #12970.)*
503.Mich.1. Beadle v. Scholle. (U.S.S.C., #25.)*
503.Mich.2. Calkins v. Hare. (ED Mich. S. Div., #22720.)*
503.Minn.1. Hedlund v. Hanson. (DC Minn., #4-62-122.)*
503.Minn.2. LaRose v. Takash. (Minn. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Miss.1. Fortner v. Barnett. (1st Jud. Dist., Hinds Co., Ch. #59,965.)*
503.Mo.1. Preisler v. Hearnes. (Mo. Sup. Ct., #49,370.) (362 S.W.2d 552.)*
503.Mo.2. Roddy v. Dalton. (DC Mo.)
503.Neb.1. League of Nebraska Municipalities v. Marsh. (DC Nebr., Lincoln, #551L.)*
503.Nev.1. Paley v. Sawyer. (DC Nev., #1593.)*
503.NH.1. Levitt v. Atty. Genl. (N.H. Sup. Ct., ##5021, 5043.)*
503.NH.2. Levitt v. Atty. General. (N.H. Sup. Ct.) (179 A.2d 286.)
503.NJ.2. Jackman v. Bodine. (Hudson Co. Super. Ct., Ch.) (188 A.2d 642.)
503.NM.1. Cargo v. Mechem. (N.M. Dist. Ct., Santa Fe.)*
503.NY.1. WCMA v. Simon. (U.S.S.C., #460.)*
503.NY.2. Wright v. Rockefeller. (U.S.S.C., #950.)*
503.NY.3. Honeywood v. Rockefeller. (U.S.S.C., #177.) (214 F.Supp. 897, 371 U.S. 1.)*
503.ND.1. Lien v. Sathre. (ND., SW Div., #424.)*
503.Ohio.1. Nolan v. DiSalle. (SD Ohio, #6082.)*
503.Ohio.2. Sive v. Ellis. (SD Ohio, W. Div., #6491.)*
503.Okla.2. Price v. Moss. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 41, 110. 1963: U.S.S.C. denied cert., held order not appealable.
503.Okla.3. Jones v. Winters. (Okla. Sup. Ct., #39,857.)*
503.Okla.4. Brown v. State Election Bd. (Okla. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Okla.5. Reed v. State Election Bd. (Okla. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Okla.6. Baldwin v. Moss. (U.S.S.C.)*
503.Pa.1. Start v. Lawrence. (Dauphin Co. Ct., Eq. #2536 and Law #187.)*
503.RI.1. Sweeney v. Notte. (R.I. Sup. Ct.)*
503.RI.2. Needham v. LaFrance. (DC R.I., #2930.)
503.Tenn.1. Baker v. Carr. (MD Tenn., Nashville Div., #2724.)*
503.Utah.1. Petuskey v. Clyde. (DC Utah, Central Div.)*
503.Va.1. Mann v. Davis. (U.S.S.C., #797.)*
503.Va.2. Donovan v. Harrison. (DC Va.)*
503.Vt.1. Mikell v. Rousseau. (Vt. Sup. Ct.)*
503.Vt.2. Buckley v. Hoff. (DC Vt.)*
503.Wash.1. Thigpen v. Myers. (U.S.S.C.) (211 F.Supp. 826.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 42, 110. Def's. petition for cert. pending.
503.W.Va.1. Kanawha v. Carson. (SD W.Va.)*
503.Wis.1. Wisconsin v. Zimmerman. (WD Wis., #3540.)*
503.Wyo.2. Schaefer v. Thomson. (DC Wyo., #4717.)*
504. 14th Amendment §2 Enforcement
Law review article: Arthur Carl Bonfield, The right to vote and judicial enforcement of §2 of the 14th Amendment. 46 Cornell 108.
504.1. Denman v. McCormack, Congress of the United States. (DC Mass.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 110. Consolidated with 504.2.
504.2. Denman v. Hodges. (DC DC.) (formerly Lampkin v.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 110. Consolidated with 504.1 Pending.
510. Jury Selection and Appeals to Prejudice (see also 311)
Comment: Jury selection in Florida, 15 Florida U. 500-27.
- 140 -

511. Involving Federal Employees
512. Involving Racial Discrimination

512.29. Alabama v. Seals (formerly U.S. ex rel. Seals v. Wiman.) (DC Ala.)*
512.31. Connecticut v. David. (Conn. Sup. Ct. of Err.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 43. Conn. Sup. Ct. refused to hear case; no appeal.
512.32. Giles and Giles v. Maryland. *
512.38. U.S. ex rel. Davis v. Gov. Davis. (DC La.)*
512.39. U.S. ex rel. Poret and Labat v. Davis and Walker. (SD La.)*
512.40. Mississippi v. George Gordon. (Lowndes Co. Cir. Ct.)*
512.41. Rogers v. Louisiana. (CA 5.)*
512.42. Henderson v. Louisiana. (SD La.)*
512.43. Henslee v. Stewart. (Pulaski Co., Ark., Cir. Ct.) (311 F.2d 691, 206 F. Supp. 137, 368 U.S. 935, 345 S.W.2d 472.) 1959: Pet.-Negro charged, convicted after jury trial of murder: death sentence. 1961: Ark. Sup. Ct. affirmed, rejecting argument on discriminatory jury selection. 1961: U.S.S.C. denied cert. 1961: Pet. filed petition for habeas corpus in DC, alleging jury discrimination; DC ordered state to retry petition within 7 mths., or it would grant writ. Jan. 11, 1963: CA 8 affirmed, held case like Bailey v. Henslee, 512.7, III DOCKET 39. Pending.
512.44. Lillard v. Arkansas. (U.S.S.C.) (365 S.W.2d 144, 8 RRLR 231.) June 21, 1962: Pl.-Negro convicted of 2nd degree murder; appealed to Ark. Sup. Ct. on ground of exclusion of Negroes from petit jury panel. Feb. 11, 1963: Ark. Sup. Ct. aff'd, held no showing as to how juries were selected, 5 Negroes on jury panel for term in question. Pet's. appeal to U.S.S.C. pending.
512.45. North Carolina v. Arnold. (U.S.S.C.) (129 S.E.2d 229, 8 RRLR 235.) 1962: Def.-Negroes convicted of murder of white man. Issue on appeal included systematic exclusion of Negroes from grand jury panels. Feb. 1, 1963: Ark. Sup Ct. aff'd., holding state laws regulating selection of jurors had been followed; Defs. failed to carry burden of proof, having shown only that few Negroes had served on jury panels. Defs.' appeal to U.S.S.C. pending.
513. Involving Economic Discrimination
514. Involving Political Discrimination
515. Involving Discrimination Against Women
520. Education
Pamphlet: J. Kenneth Mortand, Token desegregation and beyond. Southern Regional Council, 5 Forsyth St., N.W., Atlanta, June, 1963. 28 pp.
521. Challenges to Unequal Facilities

521.1. Holland v. Bd. of Pub. Inst. (Palm Beach, Fla.) (SD Fla., #7161.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 43. 1963: Pls. moved for summary judgment; June, 1963: DC granted motion; approved Defs.' plan for desegregation.
522. Suits To Enforce Integration

522.Ala.2a. Armstrong v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ. (ND Ala., #9678.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 44, 85. (8 RRLR 460.) Jy. 12, 1963: DC ordered Def.-Bd. to submit plan for desegregation beginning Sept. 1963. CA 5 affirmed over objection of Pls. who wanted more grades desegregated.
522.Ala.2b. Nelson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ. (CA 5.)
522.Ala.3. Koen v. Knight. (Ala. Vocational Schools.) (SD Ala., #2434.)*
522.Ala.4. Reed v. Pearson. (Reeds Chapel.) (CA 5.)*
522.Ala.5. Lee v. Macon Co. Bd. of Educ. (MD Ala., #604E.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 85. DC ordered Bd. to submit desegregation plan, using a non-discriminatory Alabama pupil-placement law, by Dec 12, to commence Jan. 1964.
522.Ala.6. Hereford v. City of Huntsville. (ND Ala.) Aug. 13, 1963: DC ordered, for first time, actual desegregation of elementary school system; ordered Bd. of Educ. to accept 4 Negroes into all-white schools; ordered city to submit desegregation plan by Jan. 1, 1964.
522.Ala.7. U.S. v. Mobile Co. Bd. of School Comm. (SD Ala., #2964.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 85. DC dismissed; held Pl. "without authority" to bring suit. Pl's. appeal to CA 5 pending.
522.Ala.7a. Davis v. Mobile Co. Bd. of School Comm. (SD Ala.) (CA 5, #20558, #20657.) (8 RRLR 480.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 111. May, 1963: DC ordered desegregation starting 1964-65. July 9, 1963: CA 5 reversed, ordered DC to speed up desegregation. July 19, 1963: DC ordered Def.-Bd. to submit plan for putting Ala. pupil placement law into effect for all grades without discrimination starting Sept. 1963.
522.Ala.8. U.S. v. Madison Co. Bd. of Educ. (ND Ala., NE Div., #63-23.) (8 RRLR 490.) Pl. seeks to enjoin schools from discriminating against children of U.S. personnel. Ct. dismissed action. Held: Pl. has no standing to sue under 14th Amendment.
522.Ark.5. Dove v. Parham. (Dollarway School Dist.) (ED Ark., #3680.)*
522.Calif.1. Jackson v. Bd. of Educ. (Pasadena.) (Calif. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 44, 85, 111. Cite: (DCA) 26 Cal. Rptr. 661.
522.Calif.3. Brock v. Bd. of Educ. (San Francisco.) (ND Calif., S. Div., #41034.)*
522.Fla.2. Gibson v. Bd. of Pub. Inst. (Dade Co.) (Sd Fla., #6978.)*
522.Fla.3. Manning v. Bd. of Pub. Inst. of Hillsborough Co. (Tampa.) (SD Fla., #3554.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 45. May 25, 1963: DC approved grade-a-year plan.
522.Fla.6. Tillman v. Bd. of Pub. Inst., Volusia Co. (SD Fla., Jacksonville Div., #4501.)*
- 141 -

522.Fla.7. Braxton v. Bd. of Pub. Inst., Duval Co. (Jacksonville.) (SD Fla., #4598.) (formerly listed as Stoudenmire v. Braxton.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 45. On remand, DC ordered grade-a-year desegregation.
522.Fla.9. Weaver v. Bd. of Pub. Inst., Brevard Co. (Cape Canaveral.) (SD Fla., Orlando Div., #1172.)*
522.Fla.10. Mays v. Bd. of Pub. Inst., Sarasota Co. (SD Fla., Tampa Div., #4242-Civ. T.)*
522.Fla.11. Ellis v. Kipp, Bd. of Pub. Inst., Orange Co. (Orlando.) (SD Fla., Orlando Div., #1215.)*
522.Fla.13. Mills v. Boone. (Polk Co.) (ED Fla.)*
522.Fla.14. Scott v. Bd. of Inst. (St. John's Co.) (SD Fla., #4894.)*
522.Fla.15. Hall v. Bd. of Pub. Inst. (Broward Co.) (SD Fla., #10,820.)*
522.Fla.16. Milledge v. Fla. State Bd. of Control. (Leon Co. Cir. Ct.) July 8, 1963: Suit filed to block use of state funds for all-Negro law school at Florida A & M Univ. Pls. allege U. of Fla. could absorb all students from this school. Pending.

Tobias Simon, Esq., 706 Ainsley Blvd., 14 N.E. First St., and Howard Dixon, Esq., Seybold Bldg., both of Miami, Fla.

522.Fla.17. Hammond v. Univ. of Tampa. (MD Fla.) 1963: Pls. filed school desegregation suit. Pending.
522.Ga.3. Calhoun v. Latimer. (Atlanta.) (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 45, 85. June 17, 1963: CA 5 (2-1) refused to order speedup of grade-a-year plan.
522.Ga.6. Stell v. McCormac (Savannah.) (SD Ga., #1316.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 46, 112. May 13, 1963: DC denied injunction. May 24, 1963: CA 5 reversed; held Bd. must integrate at least one grade by Sept. 1963; said DC wrongly allowed intervention. Jy. 30, 1963: DC approved Def.-Bd's. plan to desegregate 12th grade by Sept. 1963; grade-a-year after that starting from highest grade.
522.Ga.7. Emory University v. Georgia. (Atlanta.) (Ga. Sup. Ct. #21731.)*
522.Ga.8. Anderson v. Dougherty Co. Bd. of Educ. (MD Ga.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 112. Jy. 13, 1963: DC ordered Def. to submit plan within 30 days; denied Pl's. motion for temporary injunction.
522.Ill.1. Webb v. Bd. of Educ. (Chicago.) (CA 7.)*
522.Ill.2. Burrows v. Bd. of Educ. (Chicago.) (ND Ill., E. Div., #62 C 206.)*
522.Ill.3. McNeese v. Bd. of Educ. (Centreville.) (DC Ill.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 46, 85, 112. Cite: 373 U.S. 668.
522.Ind.1. Bell v. School Bd. (Gary.) (CA 7.) (213 F.Supp. 819, 8 RRLR 63.)*
522.Kan.2. Downs v. Bd. of Educ. (Kansas City.) (DC Kan., #KC-1443.)*
522.Ky.10. Walker v. Richmond Bd. of Educ. (ED Ky., Richmond Div., #241.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 46, 112. July 23, 1963: DC approved Bd. plan which divides district into three elementary school attendance zones.

J. Earl Dearing, Esq., Louisville, Ky.

522.Ky.11. Mack v. Bd. of Educ. (Frankfort.) (ED Ky., #216.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 46. Jy. 3, 1963: DC approved plan for elementary school desegregation submitted by Def.-Bd. (High school already desegregated).

J. Earl Dearing, Esq., Louisville, Ky.

522.Ky.12. Mason v. Jessamine Co. Bd. of Educ. (ED Ky., #1496.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 85. Jy. 16, 1963: DC accepted Def.-Bd's. plan for desegregation; Pl. expressed satisfaction.

James A. Crumlin, Esq., Louisville, Ky.

522.La.1. Bush v. Orleans Parish School Bd. (New Orleans.) (ED La., #3630.)*
522.La.2. Hall v. St. Helena Parish School Bd. (ED La., Baton Rouge Div., #1068.)*
522.La.3. Angel v. La. State Bd. of Educ. (La. Trade Schools.) Facts: VI DOCKET 95. May 24, 1960: DC ordered desegregation. June 26, 1963: U.S. filed petition against director of school, seeking civil contempt decree for failure to obey ct. order. Pending.
522.La.4. Davis v. E. Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. (ED La., Baton Rouge Div., #1662.) (214 F.Supp. 624.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 47. Jy. 17, 1963: DC ordered desegregation of 12th grade beginning Sept. 1964, as proposed by Def.-Bd. Pl's. appeal pending.
522.La.12. Guillory and Elloi v. Tulane Univ. (ED La.)*
522.La.13. Harris, Crayton v. St. John the Baptist Parish School Bd. (ED La., New Orleans Div., #13212.)*
522.La.14. U.S. v. Bossier Parish School Bd. (WD La., Shreveport Div., #9282-S.)*
522.Mich.3. Sherrill School Parents Comm., Bentley v. Bd. of Educ. (Detroit.) (ED Mich., S. Div., #22092.)*
522.Miss.1a. Greene v. Fair. (SD Miss., Jackson Div., #3130.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 113. (314 F.2d 200, 8 RRLR 111.)
522.Miss.2. Medgar Evers v. Jackson School Bd. (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 113. June 29: DC dismissed suit on ground Pls. failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Jy. 16, 1963: Pls. filed motion for preliminary injunction pending appeal before CA 5: CA 5 refused to advance motion; hearing scheduled for January, 1964. Pending.
522.Miss.3. Hudson v. Leake Co. School Board. (SD Miss.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 113. June 24, 1963: DC dismissed on ground Pls. failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Pls.' appeal to CA 5 pending.
522.Miss.4. U.S. v. School Bd. (Biloxi.) (CA 5.) 1963: U.S. filed suit to desegregate schools attended by dependents of military personnel stationed near Def.-schools. June 17, 1963: DC dismissed, held U.S. is not proper party Pl. Appeal pending to CA 5.
522.Miss.5. U.S. v. School Bd. (Gulfport.) (CA 5.) 1963: U.S. filed suit similar to 522.Miss.4. Same action, status.
- 142 -

522.Mo.2. Davis v. Bd. of Educ. (Charleston.) (ED Mo., #S62 C51.)*
522.Mo.3. Lewis v. Bd. of Educ., Deering. (Pemiscot.) May 6, 1963: Pls. filed school desegregation suit.

Clyde S. Cahill, Jr., Esq., St. Louis, Mo.

522.NJ.4a. Fisher v. School Bd. of Orange (N.J. Commr. of Educ.) (8 RRLR 730.) 1963: Pl.-Negro parents of elementary school pupils petitioned for desegregation of Def's. 8 elementary schools, alleging discrimination in neighborhood school pupil assignment system. May 15, 1963: Commr. decided school borderlines should reflect race; schools ordered to implement plans avoiding concentration of Negro pupils in certain schools.
522.NY.6. Branche v. Bd. of Educ. (Hempstead.) (ED NY, #62-C-176.)*
522.NY.6a. Complaint against Bd. of Educ. (Hempstead.) (N.Y. State Commr. of Educ.)*
522.NY.7. Blacker v. Bd. of Educ. (Manhasset, Long Island.) (ED NY, #62-C-285.)*
522.NY.9. Aikens v. Bd. of Educ. (Rochester.) (WD NY, #9736.)*
522.NY.10. Bailey v. Bd. of Educ. (Westbury.) (DC NY.)*
522.NC.6. Jeffers v. Whitley. (Caswell Co.) (MD N.C., Greensboro Div., #1079.)*
522.NC.12. Griffith v. Robinson. (Yancey Co.) (WD N. C., #1881.)*
522.NC.13a. Farmer v. Greene Co. Bd. of Educ. (ED N.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 86. DC denied injunction.
522.NC.14. Wheeler v. Durham City Bd. of Educ. (M.D. N.C., #C 54-D-60.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 48, 113. Jy. 1963: DC ordered "total and complete desegregation" of all city schools beginning with 1964-65 school year.
522.NC.14a. Spaulding v. Durham City Bd. of Educ. (MD N.C., #C-116-D-60.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 49, 86. Jy. 1963: DC rejected Def.-Bd's plan, ordered "total and complete desegregation" of all schools starting in 1964-65 school year.
522.NC.14b. Pls. v. Durham Co. Bd. of Educ. (MD N.C., Greensboro Div.) Jy. 23, 1963: Pl.-Negroes filed school desegregation suit seeking permanent injunction to prevent Co. "from continuing a policy, practice, custom and usage of operating and maintaining a biracial school system." Suit challenges provisions of N.C. Pupil Assignment Law. Pending.
522.NC.17. Wynn v. Trs., Charlotte Community College System. (U.S.S.C.)*
522.NC.18. Hunter v. Raleigh City Bd. of Educ. (ED N.C., Raleigh Div., #1308.)*
522.NC.19. Belo v. Ranolph Co. Bd. of Educ. (MD N.C. #209-G-62.)*
522.N.C.20. Conley v. Transylvania Co. Bd. of Educ. (WD N.C., #2094.)*
522.NC.21. Gilmore v. High Point Bd. of Educ. (MD N.C.)*
522.NC.22. Cabaniss v. Shelby Bd. of Educ. (WD N.C., #2134.)*

Reuben J. Dailey, Esq., 13½ Eagle St., Asheville, and Conrad O. Pearson, Esq., 203½ E. Chapel Hill St., Durham.

522.NC.23. Ford v. Cumberland Co. Bd. of Educ. (ED N.C.)*
522.NC.24. Ziglar v. Reidsville Bd. of Educ. (MD N.C.) (Greensboro Div., #C-226-G-62.)*
522.Okla.6. Dowell v. Bd. of Educ. (Oklahoma City.) (WD Okla., #9452.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 49. Jy. 11, 1963: DC ordered Def. halt transferring pupils on race basis, admit Pl., begin non-discriminatory assignment of faculty, submit desegregation plan by Oct. 11, 1963. Pending.
522.Pa.1. Chisholm v. Bd. of Pub. Educ. (Philadelphia.) (ED Pa., #29706.)*
522.SC.1. Briggs v. Elliott. (Clarendon Co.) (CA 4.)*
522.SC.2. Brunson v. Bd. of Trs., Clarendon Co. School Dist. No. 1. (ED S.C., #7210.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 49, 86. U.S.S.C. denied cert. Pending in DC.
522.SC.5. Stanley v. Darlington Co. School Dist. No. 1. (ED S.C., #7749.)*
522.SC.6. Brown v. School Dist. 20. (Charleston.) (ED S.C., #7747.)*
522.SC.7. Gantt v. Clemson College Bd. of Trs. (U.S.S.C.)*
522.SC.9. Monteith v. U. of South Carolina (ED S.C.) October, 1962: Pl.-Negro girl brought suit for admittance to University. July 10, 1963: DC ordered Pl. admitted, held suit a proper class action. Pl. and 2 other Negro students admitted Sept. 1963.

Matthew Perry, Esq., 1107½ Washington St., Columbia, S.C.

522.Tenn.1a. Boyce v. Humphreys Co. Bd. of Educ. (Nashville.) (MD Tenn., #3130.)*
522.Tenn.6. Goss v. Bd. of Educ. (Knoxville.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 50, 86, 113. Cite: 373 U.S. 683.
522.Tenn.7. Northcross v. Memphis Bd. of Educ. (WD Tenn., #3931.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 50, 86. May 24, 1963: DC approved plan as filed by Def.-Bd.: desegregation of first four grades in 41 of 81 elementary schools in Sept. 1963; rejected Pls.' plan calling for total desegregation by 1965. Pls.' appeal to CA 6 pending.
522.Tenn.8. Mapp v. Chattanooga Bd. of Educ. (CA 6, #150389.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 50. Jy. 8, 1963: CA 6 affirmed DC rejection of transfer provisions (allowing transfers by pupils whose race is in minority); reversed DC striking of faculty desegregation portion of complaint. Pening.
522.Tenn.9. Maxwell v. Davidson Co. Bd. of Educ. (near Nashville.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 50, 86, 113. Cite: 373 U.S. 683.
522.Tenn.11. Vick v. Co. Bd. of Educ. (Obion Co.) (WD Tenn., #3129.)*
- 143 -

522.Tenn.12. Monroe v. Jackson Bd. of Educ. (WD Tenn.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 113. June, 1963: DC granted Pls.' motion for summary judgment; Def.-Bd. submitted plan. Pending CA 6 ruling on jury trial question in 522.Tenn.13.

Avon N. Williams, Jr., Esq., 327 Charlotte Ave., Nashville.

522.Tenn.13. Pls. v. Madison Co. Bd. of Educ. (WD Tenn.) Pls. filed school desegregation suit. Je. 14, 1963: DC held that no jury trial required, white students could not intervene in suit; granted Pls.' motion for summary judgment, ordered Def.-Bd. to submit plan. Jy. 15, 1963: Def.-Bd. filed plan. On motion of member of Def.-Bd., CA 6 issued stay pending appeal. Pending.

Avon N. Williams, Jr., Esq., 327 Charlotte Ave., Nashville.

522.Tenn.14. Robinson v. Memphis Bd. of Educ. (Shelby Co.) (DC Tenn., Memphis.) June, 1963: Pls. filed school desegregation suit. Pending.

B. L. Hooks, R. B. Sugarman, A. W. Willis, Jr., Esqs., all of Memphis.

522.Tex.7. Ross v. Rogers. (Houston.) (CA 5.)*
522.Tex.10. Flax v. Potts. (Fort Worth.) (ND Tex., #4205.) (204 F.Supp. 458, 313 F.2d 284.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 50, 86, 114.
522.Tex.14. Eastland v. Wheat. (Northeast Houston.) (SD Tex., #13,330.)*
522.Tex.15. Evans v. Brooks. (Texas City.) (SD Tex., Galveston Div., #2803.)*
522.Tex.16. Sanders v. Ransom. (U. of Tex.) (WD Tex., Austin Div., #1231.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 51. Pending.

Amicus brief for Central Texas Affiliate, ACLU, by Mullinax, Wells, Morris and Mauzy, Esqs., 1601 Natl. Bankers Life Bldg., Dallas.

522.Tex.17. Thomas v. Bowen. (Bryan.) (SD Tex., #13,850.)*
522.Tex.18. McGrue v. Williams. (WD Tex., Waco Div., #2291.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 86. Bd. plans 6-year desegregation program starting with first grade Sept. 1963.
522.Tex.19. Adams v. Matthews. (Longview.) (ED Tex., Tyler Div., #3095.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 86. Ct. ordered desegregation on a stair-step plan.
522.Tex.20. Carter v. Hix (Gatesville.) (WD Tex., Waco Div.)*
522.Tex.21. Rainwater v. Smith. (Carrollton.) (ND Tex., Dallas Div. #9333.) 1962: Pls. filed school desegregation suit. Jan. 22, 1963: DC approved Bd.-formulated plan, after striking provision allowing pupil to transfer from school where majority of pupils are of different race.
522.Tex.22. Smith v. Flowers. (Southwest Texas State College.) (WD Tex., Austin Div., #1305.) 1962: Pl.-Negro applied for admission to Def. college; denied because of race. Suit filed in DC. Feb. 4, 1963: DC ordered Pl. admitted.
522.Tex.23. Miller v. Barnes. (Georgetown.) (WD Tex.) School desegregation suit filed. Ct. ordered grade-a-year plan starting with first grade, Sept. 1964. Pls. appealing to CA 5 because plan too slow. Pending.
522.Tex.24. Rice Institute v. Carr. (DC Tex.) Feb. 1963: Suit filed by trustees of founder's will, dated 1891, to strike provision prohibiting admission of Negroes. June, 1963: group of alumni intervened in opposition to suit. Pending.
522.Va.1. Allen, Griffin v. Co. School Bd. (Prince Edward Co.) (CA 4.) (8 RRLR 94.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 51. Aug. 12, 1963: CA 4 remanded case to Va. Sup. Ct. of Appeals to settle questions of state law, vacated prior findings of DC, held (2-1) that Pls. only federal ground required proof that Co. had duty to provide free education.
522.Va.1a. U.S. v. Prince George Co. Bd. of Educ. (ED Va., #3536.)*
522.Va.3a. Adkinson v. School Bd. (Newport News.) (ED Va., Newport News Div., #642.)*
522.Va.4. Hill v. School Bd. (Norfolk.) (ED Va.)*
522.Va.5. Dillard v. School Bd. (Charlottesville.) (U.S.S.C.)*
522.Va.6. Brooks v. School Bd. (Arlington Co.)*
522.Va.13. Kilby v. Warren Co. School Bd. (WD Va.) (6 RRLR 121.)*
522.Va.14a. Bradley v. School Bd. (Richmond) (ED Va., #3353.)*
522.Va.20. Blackwell v. School Bd. (Fairfax Co.) (ED Va., #1967.)*
522.Va.21. Green v. School Bd. (City of Roanoke.) (WD Va., Roanoke Div., #1098.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 52. Je. 3, 1963: DC approved 5-year desegregation plan, except "escape clause" for minority transfer.
522.Va.21a. Marsh v. School Bd. (Roanoke Co.) (WD Va., Roanoke Div., #1095.)*
522.Va.24. Jackson v. School Bd. (Lynchburg.) (WD Va., Lynchburg Div., #534.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 52, 86, 114. CA rejected "minority transfer" provisions, held grade-a-year plan too slow.
522.Va.25. Anderson v. School Bds., West Point and King William Co. (Richmond.) (ED Va., #3365.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 52. DC rejected Def.-Bd's plan because of minority transfer provisions.
522.Va.26. McLeod v. Chesterfield Co. School Bd. and Va. Pupil Placement Bd. (near Richmond.) (ED Va., #3431.)*
522.Va.27. Williams v. Winchester School Bd. (WD Va., Harrisonburg Div., #629.)*
522.Va.28. Scott v. Fredericksburg School Bd. (ED Va., #3438.)*
522.Va.29. Brown v. Frederick Co. School Bd. (WD Va.)*
522.Va.30. Gilliam v. Hopewell School Bd. (ED Va.) 1962: Pls. filed school desegregation suit. Jy. 12, 1963: DC ordered admission of 9 Negro-Pls. to two white schools. Pending.
522.Va.31. Buckner v. School Bd. (Greene Co.) (DC Va.) May, 1963: Pls. filed school desegregation suit. Pending.
522.WVa.3. Taylor v. Raleigh Co. Bd. of Educ. (SD W.Va.)*
523. Suits To Prevent Integration (see also 204, 213, 223)
- 144 -

524. Miscellaneous Suits to End Segregation (see also 555)

524.2. Shaffer v. White Citizens' Council Forum, Miss. Sovereignty Comm., Miss. Gov. Barnett, Treas. Gandy. (SD Miss., #3068.)*
530. Housing — Racial Discrimination
Law review articles:

William E. Hellerstein, The benign quota, equal protection, and the rule in Shelley's case. 17 Rutgers 531-61.

Martin E. Sloane and Monroe H. Freedman, The executive order on housing: The constitutional basis for what it fails to do. 9 Howard 1-19.

531. In Public and Publicly-Assisted Housing — Urban Renewal (Title I)

531.10. Arena v. Columbia Univ. (Comm. on Human Rights.)*
531.11. Smith v. Holiday Inns of America. (Nashville.) (MD Tenn.)*
531.12. Johnson v. Redevelopment Agency of the City of Oakland. (California.) (U.S.S.C.) (317 F.2d 872.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 114. Pls.' petition for cert. Pending.
532. In Publicly-Assisted Housing — FHA and VA

532.24. Hurson v. Branden Enterprises, Tropicana Village. (Calif.) (Santa Clara Co. Super. Ct.)*
532.25. Holmes v. Bank of America. (San Diego Super. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 53, 86, 114. Case settled.
532.26. Gregory v. Zehman. (Cleveland.) (Com. Pleas Ct., #742-019.)*
532.29. Scott v. Houston. (Berkeley.) (Alameda Co. Super. Ct.)*
533. In Private Housing

533.20. Progress Development Corp. v. Mitchell. (Deerfield.) (ND Ill., E. Div., #5 C 2050.)*
533.22. Divine v. Koch. (Calif.) (Sacramento Super. Ct.)*
533.30. Swann v. Burkett. (Berkeley.) (Calif. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 53. Jan. 16, 1963: Calif. Sup. Ct. refused to hear appeal.
533.32. Smith v. Curt Craft. (Portland.) (Multnomah Co. Cir. Ct., #265957, #266890.)*
533.37. Droeger v. DeVries, Select Realty and Rentals. (San Francisco Super. Ct.)*
533.39. Johnson v. Coldwell, Banker and Co. (Sacramento.) (Sacramento Co. Super. Ct., #132566.)*
533.41. Stevenson and Kent v. Genl. Fedl. Svgs. and Loan Assn. Harris Trust and Svgs. Bank. (Chicago.) (ND Ill., #61-C-178.)*
533.48. Vaught v. Village Creek Homeowners Assn., Inc. (Norwalk.) (Fairfield Co. Super. Ct.)*
533.49. Ruiz v. Bertolotti. (App. Div., N.Y. Sup. Ct.)*
533.53. Duff v. McCoy. (Carmichael.) (Sacramento Co. Super Ct., #124694.)*
533.54. Mims v. Values, Inc. (Berkeley.) (Berkeley-Albany Muni. Ct.)*
533.55. Curtiss v. Interlake Realty. (Wash. Sup. Ct., #36696.)*
533.56. Thomas v. Goolis, Paxinos. (San Francisco Muni. Ct., #477388.)*
533.57. Mason v. Grenell. (Shaker Hts.) (Cuyahoga Co., ##771,-611, 771, 612.)*
533.59. Kammer and Rowland v. Marlon. (S.F. Muni. Ct., #482276.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 87, 115. Case settled; dismissed with prejudice.
533.60. Illinois Terra Realty and Building, Inc. v. Flanagan, Bldg. Comm'r. (Harvey, Ill.) (ND Ill, ED.) Pl. seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for Def's refusal to issue bldg. permit; alleges permits denied because Pl. would sell to Negroes. Pending.

Chauncey Eskridge, Esq., 123 W. Madison St., Chicago.

533.61. Bolden v. Fleck. (NY State Comm. for Human Rights.) Pl.-Negro claims she was barred by Defs. (brokers, owners) from renting Brooklyn apartment because of race. Pending.
533.62. Cooger v. Atlanta. (Fulton Co., Ga. Super. Ct., Atlanta Jud. Cir. #A-97679.) (8 RRLR 179.) Dec. 17, 1962: Pl-Negroes brought suit to enjoin city from maintaining street barricades which had been erected as "racial buffers" to perpetuate residential segregation. Mar. 1, 1963: Ct. took judicial notice that barricades were as alleged, held city could not validly "legislate in respect of use of public streets . . . for the purpose of affecting on the basis of race or color the ownership and occupancy of real property and the acquisition or disposition or the market value thereof." Ct. issued injunction against maintenance of the barricades.

Donald L. Hollowell, Esq., 859½ Hunter St., NW, Atlanta.

534. Omnibus Suits to End Housing Segregation

534.1. Cotillion Club, Inc. v. Detroit Real Estate Bd. (ED Mich., S. Div., #22058.)*
535. Miscellaneous Housing Suits
540. Transportation — Racial Discrimination
541. In Interstate Facilities

541.Ala.1. Baldwin v. Morgan. (Birmingham.) (ND Ala.)*
541.Ala.6. Alabama v. Zweig. (Birmingham.) (Birmingham Muni. Ct.)*
541.Ala.9. Alabama v. Rev. Abernathy. (Montgomery.) (Ala. Sup. Ct.)*
541.Ala.12. U.S. v. City of Montgomery, Bd. of Commrs., Ranch Enterprises, Inc. (CA 5.)*
541.Ala.13. Alabama v. Sizemore, Greyhound Restaurant Mgr. (Birmingham.) (Birmingham Muni. Ct.)*
541.Ala.14. U.S. v. City of Birmingham Officials. (ND Ala.)*
541.Calif.3. Thomas v. Nevada Club. (San Francisco Muni. Ct., #447044.)*
- 145 -

541.Fla.2. Dresner v. City of Tallahassee. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 56, 115. Cite for cert. granted: 372 U.S. 963.
541.Fla.3. Smith, Callender and O'Connor v. Florida. (Ocala.) (Fla. Sup. Ct.)*
541.Fla.4. Lamb v. Hillsborough Country Aviation Auth. (SD Fla., #4020.)*
541.Ga.2. Georgia v. Defs. (Atlanta.) (Atlanta City Ct., Fulton Co. Crim. Ct.)*
541.Ga.3. Georgia v. Rev. Moss. (Atlanta.) (Fulton Co. Crim. Ct.)*
541.Ga.5. Georgia v. Defs. (Atlanta.) (Atlanta City Ct.)*
541.Ill.1. Wright v. C. B. & Q. Railroad, Vanderbilt Better Tours. (ND Ill., #62 C 1282.)*
541.La.1. Adams v. City of New Orleans. (CA 5.)*
541.La.2. U.S. v. New Orleans, Aviation Bd. and Interstate Hosts, Inc. (ED La., #19898.)*
541.La.5. Louisiana v. Walmsley, Trailways Station Mgr. (Shreveport.) (Caddo Parish Ct.)*
541.La.6. U.S. v. Local Officials. (Shreveport.) (WD La.)*
541.Miss.1. Mississippi v. Farmer, "Freedom Riders." (Jackson.) (Miss. Sup. Ct.)*
541.Miss.4. Mississippi v. Frieze, Carey, Luster. (Jackson.) (Miss. Sup. Ct.)*
541.Miss.6. Bailey v. Atty. Genl. Patterson, (Jackson.) (CA 5.)*
541.Miss.7. U.S. v. Fraiser. (Greenwood.)*
541.Miss.8. Mississippi v. Moses. (McComb.) (Cir. Ct.)*
541.Miss.9. U.S. v. Mayor and Selectmen of McComb City. (SD Miss., #3215.)*
541.Miss.10. Douglas v. CORE. (McComb.) (CA 5.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 57, 116. Cite for CA 5 setting aside injunction: 318 F.2d 95.
541.Miss.13. Mississippi v. Rev. Chas. Jones, Taylor and G. Jackson. (Jackson.) (Jackson Muni. Ct.)*
541.Miss.14. U.S. v. Jackson City Officials. (Jackson.) (SD Miss.)*
541.Miss.15. Mississippi v. Bell. (Jackson.) (Jackson City Ct.)*
541.Miss.16. U.S. v. Oxford City Officials. (Oxford.) (DC Miss.)*
541.Miss.17. Mississippi v. Nelson, Thompson and Smith. (Poplarville.) (Pearl River Co. Ct.)*
541.Va.3. Henderson v. Trailways Bus Co.; Robinson v. Hunter. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 57. U.S.S.C. denied cert.
542. In Intrastate Facilities (and see 51, 54, 55, 58)

542.4. Evers v. Dwyer. (Memphis.) (DC Tenn.)*
542.12a. Rev. Shuttlesworth and Phifer v. City of Birmingham. (CA 5, #19497.)*
542.16. City of Montgomery v. Taylor. (Montgomery City Ct.)*
542.17. City of Petersburg v. Defs. (Petersburg Muni. Ct.)*
542.20. Georgia v. Defs. (Macon.) (Macon Muni. Ct.)*

See summary of Albany cases at 55.

542.21. Georgia v. 5 Defs. (Albany.) (Albany Recorder's Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 58. Defs. convicted, appeal pending.
542.21a. Georgia v. Forman, Lee, Collins. (Albany.) (Albany Super. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 58. Cases not yet tried.
542.21b. Georgia v. 267 Defs. (Albany.) (Albany Recorder's Ct., Juvenile Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 58. Cases not yet tried. Defs. on bond.
542.21c. Georgia v. Slater King. (Albany.) (Albany Recorder's Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 58. No appeal.
542.21d. Georgia v. 198 Defs. (Albany.) (Albany Recorder's Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 58. Cases not yet tried.
550. Miscellaneous Racial Discrimination (and see 51, 54, 55, 58)
Comment: Custom as law within the meaning of equal protection clause: an approach to problems of racial discrimination. 17 Rutgers 563-78.
551. In Recreational Facilities

551.Ark.1. Freeman v. City of Little Rock. (ED Ark., W. Div., #LR-62-C-40.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 116. (8 RRLR 173.)
551.Calif.5. Santa Clara Voiture 365 v. American Legion 40 & 8 Society. (Santa Clara Super. Ct., #110512.)*
551.Calif.9. Lowe v. Given and Donaldson d/b/a Park Lane Hotel. (Menlo Park.) (San Mateo Super. Ct.)*
551.Fla.5. Bohler v. Lane, Mayor of Tampa. (SD Fla., #3809.)*
551.Ga.4. Wright v. Georgia. (Savannah.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 59, 116. Cite: 373 U.S. 284.
551.Ga.5. King v. Mayor Hartsfield, Judge Webb. (Atlanta.) (ND Ga., #7603.)*
551.Ga.7. Georgia v. Defs. (Atlanta.) (Fulton Co. Crim. Ct.)*
551.Ga.8. Patterson v. MacLean (Savannah.) (SD Ga. #1321.)*
551.Ky.1. M. Switow & Sons Enterprises, Inc. v. Lexington Chap., CORE. (Fayette Co. Cir. Ct., #9613.)*

And see 552.Ky.1.

551.Ky.2. Walker v. Bd. of Educ. (Richmond.) (ED Ky., #238.)*
551.La.3. Bates v. Sheraton Corp. of America. (New Orleans.) (MD La., #12,940.)*
551.Md.1. Griffin, Drews v. Maryland. (Baltimore.) (U.S.S.C., ##26, 7.)*
551.Md.2. Statom v. Co. Commissioners. (Prince George Co.) (Md. Ct. of App.) 1962: Pl.-Negroes filed suit seeking injunction against Co. permitting boys club (which discriminated against Negroes) to use public playgrounds and school facilities; Boys Club Dir. had free office in Co. Service Bldg. Feb. 28, 1963: Cir. Ct. dismissed, finding use by club temporary, other groups granted similar uses. Appeal pending.

Isaac N. Groner, Esq., 1411 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

- 146 -

551.Miss.2. U.S. v. Harrison Co., Co. Bd. of Supervisors, Co. Sheriff, City of Biloxi, City Mayor, Police Chief. (CA 6.)*
551.Miss.3. Mississippi v. Defs. (Jackson.) (Jackson Muni. Ct.)*
551.Miss.4. Pls. v. City of Jackson. (CA 5, #19961.)*

And see 555.Miss.1.

551.NY.8. New York v. Komisar. (NYC Adolescent Ct.)*
551.NC.4. Edwards v. Abercrombie Enterprises. (Durham.) (MD N.C., #C-138-D-62.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 117.

F. B. McKissick, Esq., 213½ W. Main St., and C. O. Pearson, Esq., 203½ E. Chapel Hill St., both of Durham, N.C.

551.SC.4. Brown v. S.C. State Forestry Comm. (ED S.C., #AC-774.)*
551.SC.5. Walker v. Shaw. (Greenville.) (WD S.C., #2983.)*
551.Tenn.6. Watson v. Memphis. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 60, 117. Cite: 373 U.S. 526.
551.Tenn.8. City of Knoxville v. Defs. (Knoxville Muni. Ct.)*
551.Va.7. Virginia v. James. (Hampton.) (Hampton Cir. Ct.)*
551.Va.9. Pls. v. City of Richmond. (Richmond Hustings Ct.)*
552. In Dining Places (and see 51, 54, 55, 58)

552.Ala.4a. City of Montgomery v. King and Embry. (Ala. Ct. of Appeals.)*
552.Ala.5. Rev. Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 60, 117. Cite: 373 U.S. 262.
552.Ala.10. City of Birmingham v. Burks. (Birmingham Muni. Ct.)*
552.Ala.11. Gober v. City of Birmingham. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 60, 117. Cite: 373 U.S. 374.
552.Ark.2. Briggs, Smith, Lupper v. Arkansas. (Ark. Sup. Ct., ##4992, 4994, 4997.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 61. Ct. held constitutional 1959 law making refusal to honor management request to leave business establishment a misdemeanor. 2 Defs. sentenced to 30 days and $500 fines. Ct. dismissed sit-in charges for insufficient evidence. Ct. refused to decide constitutionality of breach of peace law curbing sit-ins.
552.Fla.4. Florida v. Robinson. (Shell City, Miami.) (U.S.S.C.)*
552.Ga.10. Georgia v. King. (Atlanta City Ct.)*
552.Ga.11. Georgia v. Def. (Atlanta.) (City Ct.)*
552.Ga.13. Georgia v. 8 Drs. (Atlanta.) (Fulton Co. Ct.)*
552.Ky.1. Kentucky v. Defs. (Louisville.) (Muni Ct.)*

And see 551.Ky.1.

552.Ky.2. Kentucky v. Defs. (Louisville.) (Muni Ct.)*
552.La.1. Garner, Briscoe, Hoston v. Louisiana. (Baton Rouge.) (U.S.S.C.)*
552.La.2. Lombard v. Louisiana. (New Orleans.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 61, 117. Cite: 373 U.S. 267.
552.Md.4. Maryland v. Wagner. (Queenstown.) (Centerville Muni. Ct.)*
552.Md.5. Bell v. Maryland. (Baltimore.) (U.S.S.C., #167.)*
552.Mo.2. Missouri v. Def. (Columbia.) (Police Ct.)*
552.NC.3. Avent v. North Carolina. (Durham.) (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 61, 118. Cite: 373 U.S. 375.
552.NC.4. Williams v. North Carolina. (Monroe.) (U.S.S.C., #10.)*
552.NC.10. North Carolina v. Defs. (Rutherford.) (Muni. Ct.)*
552.NC.11. North Carolina v. Nelson. (Statesville.) (Crim. Ct.)*
552.SC.2b. South Carolina v. Davis. (U.S.S.C.)*
552.SC.3a. Barr and Bouie v. South Carolina. (U.S.S.C., ##90, 159.)*
552.SC.3c. South Carolina v. Carter. (Columbia.) (Richland Co. Ct.)*
552.SC.4. City of Rock Hill v. Henry (U.S.S.C., #97.)*
552.SC.4b. South Carolina v. Rev. Ivory, Dietrich, Hackley. (Rock Hill.) (Muni. Ct.)*
552.SC.4c. South Carolina v. Ivory. (Rock Hill.) (York Co. Cir. Ct.)*
552.SC.4d. City of Rock Hill v. Hamm. (U.S.S.C.)*
552.SC.6. City of Florence v. George. (Florence Co. Cir. Ct.)*
552.SC.7. City of Spartanburg v. Defs. (Spartanburg Recorder's Ct.)*
552.SC.8. Peterson v. City of Greenville. (U.S.S.C.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 62, 118. Cite: 373 U.S. 244.
552.SC.9a. City of Darlington v. Stanley. (U.S.S.C.)*
552.SC.10. Mitchell v. City of Charleston. (U.S.S.C., #89.)*
552.SC.11. South Carolina v. 8 Defs. (Greenville.)*
552.Tenn.4a. City of Nashville v. Carnaham. (Nashville.) (Cir. Ct.)*
552.Tenn.8. Tennessee v. Lewis. (Nashville.) (Crim. Ct.)*
552.Va.5. Randolph v. Virginia. (Richmond.) (U.S.S.C., #20.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 63. June 10, 1963: U.S.S.C. vacated, remanded to Va. Sup. Ct. of App. in light of Peterson, 552.SC.8.
552.Va.9. Virginia v. Allen. (Hopewell.) (U.S.S.C.)*
552.Va.10. Virginia v. Brumback. (Lynchburg.) (U.S.S.C., #60.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 63. Same action as Randolph, 552.Va.5.
552.Va.10a. Wood v. Virginia. (U.S.S.C., #79.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 63. June 10, 1963: U.S.S.C. vacated and remanded to Va. Sup. Ct. of App. for reconsideration in light of Peterson, 552.SC.8.
553. In Other Facilities (and see 42)

553.Ala.1. Alabama v. Defs. (Talladega.) (Muni. Ct.)*
- 147 -

553.Calif.1. Neville v. Peralta Steam Baths. (Berkeley Muni. Ct.) Pl.-Negro, refused service by Def., sues for $225. damages. Pending.

Robert Treuhaft, Esq., 1440 Broadway, Oakland.

553.Ore.1. James v. Barr. (Multnomah Co. Cir. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 118. No appeal.
553.Miss.1. Mississippi v. Defs. (Jackson.) (Muni. Ct.)*
553.NY.1. Patterson v. Max Beauty Salon. (Mineola, L.I.) (Nassau Co. Dist. Ct.)*
553.Pa.1. Johnson v. Cafaro. (Pa. Human Relations Comm, #P-52.) Pl. twice served in Def's. barber shop; then Def. discovered Pl. a Negro and refused Pl. service. Final order: Def. to cease discriminating.

Nathan Agran, Esq., for Pa. Human Relations Comm.

553.Tenn.1. Tennessee v. Freeman and Exum. (Memphis.) (Memphis Muni. Ct.)*
553.Tenn.2. Ford v. Tennessee. (Memphis.) (U.S.S.C., #397.)*
554. In Hospitals

554.Ga.1. Dr. Bell v. Grady Memorial Hospital. (Atlanta.) (ND Ga., #7966.)*
554.Ill.1. Dr. Morris, Jr. v. Chicago Hospital Council. (ND Ill., E. Div., #61 C 232.)*
554.NC.1. Simkins and U.S. v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital and Wesley Long Community Hospital. (Greensboro.) CA 4.)*
554.NC.2a. Eaton v. Grubbs. (ED N.C., #932.)*
554.NC.3. Dr. Hawkins v. N.C. Dental Society and Second Dist. Dental Society. (WD N.C., #1505.)*
554.NC.4. Porter v. N.C. Hospitals Bd. of Control. (DC N.C.)
554.SC.1. Rackley v. Bd. of Trs., Orangeburg Regional Hospital. (ED S.C., Columbia Div., #AC-887.) (310 F.2d 141.)*
554.Va.1. Wood v. Hogan. (DC Va.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 64, 119. (215 F. Supp. 53.) March 12, 1963: DC denied injunction, held transfer of hospital to non-profit corporation, although made to avoid desegregation order, immaterial, as long as transfer was complete, without possibility of reverter; held government licensing, tax-exemptions and financial assistance in construction insufficient to void transfer.

And see 555.Va.1.

555. In Government Facilities: Omnibus Suits

555.Ala.2. Faulkner v. City of Gadsden. (ND Ala., Birmingham Div.)*
555.Ala.3. Smith v. City of Birmingham. (ND Ala., S. Div.)*
555.Ala.4. Gardner v. Kendrick. (Birmingham.) (ND Ala., S. Div.)*
555.Fla.2. Brown v. Bryant. (SF Fla., Miami Div., #63-161.)*
555.Miss.1. Clark v. Thompson. (CA 5.) (313 F.2d 637, 206 F. Supp. 539.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 65. Mar. 6, 1963: CA affirmed DC denial of injunction, held suit not proper class action; affirmed DC grant of individual relief.
555.Va.1. Wood v. Vaughan. (Lynchburg.) (WD Va., Charlottesville Div., #535.) (CA 4, #8689.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 65. Ct. ordered swimming pool, armory, and court desegregated.
555.Va.2. Rev. Dunlap v. Councilmen of City of Danville. (WD Va., Danville Div.)*
560. Family Matters—Racial, Religious Problems
561. In Marriage and Divorce
Comment: Dismissal of students for violation of ecclesiastical law, 8 S.D. Univ. 117-22.
562. In Adoption Proceedings

562.4. Re J. Rockefeller. (Sup. Ct., Mineola.)*
563. In Custody Proceedings

563.9. Potter v. Potter. (Mich. Sup. Ct., #50,169.)*
564. In Miscellaneous Proceedings
570. Employment
Law review article: Francis X. Giaccone, Techniques of New York State Commission for Human Rights. 29 Brooklyn 185-95.
571. Racial Discrimination Against Teachers

571.10. Owens v. School Dist. #36, Pulaski & Alexander Co. (ED Ill., #1886-D.)*
571.11. Connellsville Joint School Bd. v. Pa. Human Rights Comm. (Ct. of Com. Pleas, Dauphin Co., #397-1962.)*
571.12. U.S. v. Bd. of Educ. (Greene Co., Miss.) (SD Miss., Hattiesburg Div., #1729.)*
571.13. Sylvia Taylor v. Chicago Bd. of Educ. (Ill. FEPC, #62-1.)*
571.14. Henry v. Coahoma Co. Bd. of Educ. (ND Miss.)*
572. Racial Discrimination by Government Agencies
Booklet: Survey of non-white employees in state government by Human Relations Commission. Dept. of Labor and Industry, 1401 Labor and Industry Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa.
572.10. In re Kelly. (N.Y. State Comm. for Human Rights.) Commission investigation found Deputy Commr. Kelly of N.Y. City Commerce Dept. placed discriminatory job order. Comm. recommended disciplinary action against Kelly.
573. Racial Discrimination Involving Government Contracts
Note: The President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity does not make available to the public lists of complaints pending before it, or the disposition of particular complaints. For this reason, the DOCKET will describe only complaints which are reported in the press at the time of their conclusion.
- 148 -

573.3. Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric (ED Pa., #32053.) (8 RRLR 161.) 1962: Pl.-Negro brought suit alleging Def.-Co. refused to hire him because of race; sought damages as beneficiary of contract between Def.-Co. and U.S. under Executive Order 10557, guaranteeing equal employment opportunities. Mar. 29, 1963: DC dismissed; held Order did not create a right for Pl.
573.4. Bishop Childs v. Rockefeller, Wagner. (SD NY, #632,127.) Pl. sues to halt public construction projects where Negro workers are allegedly excluded from jobs. Pending.

Paul B. Zuber, Esq., 315 W. 125 St., NYC.

574. Racial Discrimination by Transportation Companies

574.8. Cooks v. Bro. of Railway Carmen, Locals 991 and 783; and Texas and New Orleans R.R. Co. (SD Tex., Houston, #12329.)*
575. Racial Discrimination by Unions
Comment: Employee choice and some problems of race and remedies in representation campaigns. 72 Yale 1243-64.
575.15. Sells v. Intl. Bro. of Firemen and Oilers. (WD Pa.)*
575.18. Pls. v. Bro. of RR Trainmen. (ED Mo.)*
575.19. Randolph v. Intl. Exec. Bd., Am. Federation of Musicians. (DC Ohio, #6727.) Pls., members of Local 589, filed suit to end alleged discrimination by Def.

William J. Davis, Esq., 184½ S. High St., Columbus, Ohio.

Case note: Voluntary segregation held not illegal discrimination: Musicians' Locals 814 and 1. (88 Ohio L. Abs. 491, 19 Ohio Op. 2d 26, 7 RRLR 288, Civ. Rights Comm'n 1962) 24 Ohio St. 412-16.

575.20. New York v. Sheet Metal Workers Intl., Local 28. (N.Y. State Comm. for Human Rights.) Defs. accused of barring Negroes from training program, specifically Negro James Ballard. Pending.

Shirley Adelson Siegel, Esq., Asst. Atty. Genl., NYC.

575.21. Pa. Human Relations Comm. v. Bro. of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers. (Pa. Human Relations Comm., #E1510, 1511, 1512, 1513, 1514, 1517, 1518.) Final order: 7 Def. unions to cease discriminating; to accept "appropriate number" of non-white applicants in training programs, Comm. to use neutral craftsmen as examiners if necessary.
576. Other Racial and Religious Discrimination

576.10. Atkinson Co. v. McNeil. (Dist. Ct. App.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 67, 120. Ct. reversed FEPC. No appeal.
576.11. Contra Costa Realty Bd. v. Fair Employment Practices Comm. (Contra Costa Co. Super. Ct., #87501.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 88. Case dropped without appeal.
576.12. Lombardo, Mullally v. Queens College. (App. Div., N.Y. Sup. Ct.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 88. Nov. 1962: Sup. Ct. ordered trial on merits. May, 1963: App. Div. reversed, dismissed petitions.

Saxe, Bacon & OShea, Esqs., 20 Exchange Pl., NYC.

576.13. Calhoun v. General Motors. (Michigan FEPC, #1165.)*
577. Nationality Discrimination
578. Sex Discrimination

578.1. Beary v. Queens Co. Bar Assn. (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Queens Co., #5394-1960.)*
579. Age Discrimination
580. Civil Actions under Civil Rights Law Not Otherwise Covered (see 304)

580.5. Patterson v. Smith. (ED Mich., S. Div.)*
580.6. Royal News v. Schultz. (ED Mich., S. Div., #23094.) Facts: VIII DOCKET 68. Ct. enjoined Defs. from threatening to sue or instituting suit against Pls. regarding disputed publications. Held: publications not obscene.
590. Criminal Prosecution under Civil Rights Law

590.5. U.S. v. Donald Jones, Wm. King. (Birmingham.) (ND Ala.)*
600. Suits Involving Constitutional Rights of American Indians
See Antelope, 304.29.
601. Civil Actions between Individual Indians and Indian Tribes
602. Civil Actions Against Indians on Reservations
603. Criminal Actions Against Indians on Reservations
604. Actions Involving Property Rights
605. Condemnation of Land of American Indian Reservations