Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute Archives logo
| HOME | HISTORY | PUBLICATIONS | DOCKETS | FINDING AIDS |

Human Rights Casefinder

1953-1969 • the Warren Court Era

Numerical Table of Cases

EXPLANATION

The cases in this Table are arranged numerically according to the Classification Scheme used by the Meiklejohn Library. (See page 1.) If you do not find the case you are looking for in the category you expect to find it, look in the Index, page 274, or Alphabetical Table of Cases, page 143.

The following information is given for cases in this Table. (Note: only items 1, 2, 4, and 5 are given for all cases.)

1. PLAINTIFF OR APPELLANT

2. DEFENDANT OR APPELLEE

The title of the case in the Numerical Table of Cases may be different from that in the Alphabetical Table of Cases. (Litigants sometimes drop out or join a case at different levels of appeal, thus altering the title of the case.) The Alphabetical Table of Cases includes previous titles, while the Numerical Table of Cases lists either the title reported in the latest citation or in the latest publication of the case in Meiklejohn Library publications.

3. PLACE (in parentheses)

4. CASE NUMBER

These numbers will enable you to locate the write-up of the case in the Civil Liberties Docket, Meiklejohn Library Acquisitions, or New Draft Law. (See Selection of Cases, page ix.)

The majority of cases have a single number indicating the number at which the case was written up.

In expanding and revising the Classification Scheme, new numbers were sometimes assigned to cases. If a case number is in parentheses, this means that the new number was assigned after the latest listing in Meiklejohn Library publications. You will find the case digest under the number(s) indicated after the number in parentheses.

Some cases appeared in print without case numbers. These cases will be found unnumbered in the volume and page indicated after the case number in parentheses.

5. REFERENCES TO VOLUME AND PAGE IN MEIKLEJOHN LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS IN WHICH THE CASE WAS DESCRIBED

If two such references are given, the first refers to the earliest appearance in print, the second to the latest appearance. References showing volume and page number, e.g., XIII,2, are to the Civil Liberties Docket, volume XIII, page 2. Docket write-ups include references to descriptions of the case in previous Dockets. References such as I ACQ 41 are to Acquisitions, volume I, page 41. References such as 6th NDL 235:204 are to New Draft Law, 6th Edition (1971), page 235:204.

6. CITATIONS

Include names of books (reporter systems) in which case was reported, names of courts in which case was heard, decision, date. (See Citations, page xi, for explanation and abbreviations.)

7. SOURCES FOR LEGAL DOCUMENTS ON THE CASE

NCLL - Meiklejohn Library has copies of some legal materials in the case.

ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union has copies of documents in the case.

NLG - National Lawyers Guild has documents in the case; copies available from Meiklejohn Library.

Examples:

Rev Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, (51.Ala.f), 552.Ala.5; V,67—VIII,117; 134 So2d 213 (Ala Sup Ct 1961), rev'd 373 US 262 (1963).

The case of Rev Shuttlesworth, Appellant, versus Birmingham, Appellee, was assigned the classification number (51.Ala.f), after being published at 552.Ala.5. The facts and history of this case will be found under 552.Ala.5 in the Docket beginning at volume V, page 67, and ending at volume VIII, page 117. The case was reported in volume 134 of the Southern Reporter, 2nd Series, on page 213. The case was heard before the Alabama Supreme Court in 1961. The opinion of the US Supreme Court reversed the state court; it can be found in volume 373 of United States Reports, on page 262 (1963).

US v Bornemann, 121.411; I ACQ 41; 298 FSupp 1253 (DC Conn 1969), rem 424 F2d 1343 (CA 2 1970); MCLL

Pleadings in the case of United States, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus Bornemann, Defendant-Appellant, were listed in volume I of Acquisitions on page 41. The first opinion in the case was reported in volume 298 of the Federal Supplement, on page 1253 after it was heard by the Federal District Court in Connecticut in 1969. On appeal it was remanded to the lower court in an opinion found in volume 424 of the Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, on page 1343, by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (CA 2) in 1970. The Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Library has copies of legal documents in the case.

Chaney v US, 121.251; 6th NDL 235:204; aff'd 1 SSLR 3337 (CA 5 1969)

The case of Chaney, Defendant-Appellant, versus United States, Plaintiff-Appellee, was published at Classification Scheme number 121.251 in New Draft Law, 6th Edition, on page 235:204. The trial court's decision was affirmed in an opinion, found in volume I of Selective Service Law Reporter, on page 3337, by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (CA 5) in 1969.

I. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ASSOCIATION (First Amendment Liberties and Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments) (0-299)

FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PRESS, ASSEMBLY (10-99) SEE ALSO ASSOCIATION (200-299)
10. LICENSING (and 203, 204, 257, 264)
11. Of Meetings (and 201)
  • Hague v Committee for Industrial Organization  (11.a); 307 US 496 (1939); MCLL; ACLU
  • White v Anson  (11.b), 40.2; I,52; cd 350 US 908 (1955); ACLU
  • Ellis v Dixon  11.1; III,1,45; 349 US 458 (1955); ACLU
  • Mazey and Detroit Labor Forum v Keller  11.2; IV,1
  • ACLU v Los Angeles City Bd of Educ  11.3; IV,88—VII,35; 359 P2d 45 (Calif Sup Ct 1961), cd 368 US 819 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • ACLU of Southern California v Bd of Educ of Los Angeles  11.3a; VIII,1—IX,1; 379 P2d 4 (Calif Sup Ct 1963), cd 375 US 823 (1963)
  • Seeger v San Diego Bd of Educ  11.4; V,45
  • New York v Morris  11.5; V,71
  • Rockwell v Morris  11.6; V,71—VII,68; 176 NE2d 836 (NY Ct of App 1961), cd 368 US 913 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Florida ex rel Feldman and Ray (Emma Lazarus Organization) v Miami Beach  11.7; VI,1—VIII,69
  • Global Books Forum v Bd of Gov, Wayne State Univ  11.8; VI,1
  • New York v Humes  11.9; VI,79,101
  • Young, Social Folksinging Group v Morris  11.9a; VI,101—VII,2; ACLU
  • Fair Play for Cuba Comm v Embassy Auditorium  11.10; VI,79
  • Pls v Music at Newport  11.11; VI,102
  • Buckley v Hunter College  11.12; VI,68,101
  • Buckley v Meng  11.12a; VII,35; 230 NYS2d 924 (Spec Term 1962)
  • Dohrenwend v Bd of Educ, Union Free School Dist No 1, Scarsdale, NY and Westchester Comm for Freedom Riders  11.13; VII,68; MCLL
  • Longshoremen's Better Conditions Club v New Orleans  11.14; VII,101; 7 RRLR 194 (Civ Dist Ct La 1961)
  • Fields v Fairfield  11.15; VIII,69—IX,35; 143 So2d 177 (Ala Sup Ct 1962), rev'd 372 US 940 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Tennessee v Weinberger  11.16; IX,1
  • Forbes v Redondo Beach City Council  11.17; IX,36—X,1
  • California v R Davis  11.18; XI,1,59
  • San Francisco Mime Troupe v Recreation and Park Commn  11.18a; XII,1
  • ACLU v South Gate, California, City Council  11.19; XI,59
  • ACLU v Burbank, California, City Council  11.20; XI,59—XIII,1
  • Scheer v Oakland  11.21; XI,59; MCLL
  • Chicago v Rockwell  11.22; XII,1
  • Monroe v Los Angeles  11.23; XII,1
  • Pls v Natl States Rights Party, Lynch, Carroll  11.24; XII,1
  • Fowler v San Fernando Police  11.25; XII,1
  • American Friends Service Comm, Liberal Religious Peace Fellowship v Anaheim City Council  11.26; XIII,1
  • Coleman v Director of Parks and Recreation  11.27; XIII,1
  • Kidd v Pasadena School Dist, Bd of Educ  11.28; XIII,1
  • San Bernardino v Fowler  11.29; XIII,2
  • ACLU v HEW  11.31; XIV,1
  • Dash v Commanding General, Sec'y of Army  (11.32), 124.48; NDL 235:212; I ACQ 23
12. Of Motion Pictures (and 14, 52)
  • Superior Films v Department of Education of Ohio; Commercial Pictures Corporation v Regents of University of State of New York  (12.a); 112 NE2d 311, 113 NE2d 502, rev'd 346 US 587 (1954)
  • Joseph Burstyn v Wilson  (12.b); 343 US 495 (1952); MCLL; NLG
  • Brattle Films v Commissioner of Public Safety  (12.c), 20.3; I,2; 127 NE2d 891 (Mass Sup Jud Ct 1955)
  • Times Film Corp v Commissioner of Public Safety  (12.d), 20.4; I,2; 127 A2d 893 (Mass Sup Jud Ct 1955)
  • Capital Enterprise v New York Bd of Regents  (12.e), 20.30; I,68; 149 NYS2d 920 (NY App Div 1956); ACLU
  • Holmby Production v Vaughn  (12.f), 20.3a, 20. 30; I,33; 282 P2d 412 (Kan Sup Ct 1955), rev'd 350 US 870 (1955)
  • Byrne v Karalexis  (12.g); MCLL
  • Times Film Corp v Chicago  12.1; II,1—III,21; 244 F2d 432 (CA 7 1957), rev'd 355 US 35 (1957)
  • Kingsley Pictures v New York Bd of Regents  12.2; II,1—IV,88; 360 US 684 (1959); ACLU
  • In re Application of Excelsior Pictures Corp v Regents of Univ of New York State  12.3; II,31—III,21; 2 App Div 2d 941 (NY App Div 1956)
  • Dickinson Operating Co v Kansas City Officials  12.4; II,31
  • California v Stewart  12.5; II,65
  • ACLU v Chicago  12.6; III,1,21; 121 NE2d 585 (Ill Sup Ct 1954), app dism'd 348 US 979 (1955); 141 NE2d 56 (Ill App Ct 1957); ACLU
  • Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp v Providence  12.7; III,45—V,1
  • Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp v Blanc  12.8; III,45—V,21; 153 A2d 243 (Pa Sup Ct 1959); ACLU
  • Times Film Corp v Chicago  12.9; III,45-IV,88
  • Bell v Georgia Theatre Co  12.10; III,46,67
  • Masque Theatre Corp v Los Angeles  12.11; IV,40—V,21
  • Paramount Film Distr Corp v Chicago  12.12; IV,68—V,21; 172 F Supp 69 (ND Ill 1959)
  • Empire Pictures v Fort Worth  12.13; IV,88—V,72; 273 F2d 529 (CA 5 1960)
  • Columbia Film Distr Co v Chicago  12.14; IV, 88; ACLU
  • Times Film Corp v Chicago  12.15; V,1—VII, 35; 365 US 43 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Dana v Wm Goldman Theaters  12.16; VI,1—VII, 68; 173 A2d 59 (Pa Sup Ct 1961), cd 368 US 897 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Ohio v Warth  12.17; VII,35,68; 179 NE2d 772 (Ohio Sup Ct 1962)
  • K Gordon Murray Productions v Floyd  12.18; VII,101; 125 SE2d 207 (Ga Sup Ct 1962)
  • The Connection Co v Regents of Univ of State of New York  12.19; VIII,1; 182 NE2d 317 (NY App Div 1962), aff'd 186 NE2d 569 (Ct of App 1962); ACLU
  • Gate Film Club v Pesce  (12.20), 12.10; X,87, 133
  • Landau v Fording  (12.21), 12.11; X,87—XIII,2; 54 CR 177 (DCA 1 1966), aff'd 388 US 456 (1967); MCLL
  • Trans-Lux Distributing Corp v NY Bd of Regents  (12.22), 12.12; X,87,133; 248 NYS2d 857, 250 NYS2d 68 (NY Ct of App 1964), rev'd 380 US 259 (1965)
  • Freedman v Maryland  (12.23), 12.13; X,8—XII,1; 197 A2d 232 (Md Ct of App 1964), rev'd 380 US 51 (1965)
  • Smith, Mullan v Crumlish  (12.24), 12.14; X,133—XII,2; 218 A2d 596 (Pa Sup Ct 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Cusak v Teitel Film Corp  12.25; XII,2—XIV,1; 230 NE2d 241 (Ill Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 390 US 139 (1968); MCLL
  • Interstate Circuit v Dallas  12.26; XII,2—XIV,1; 366 F2d 590 (CA 5 1966)
  • Re Birmingham Ordinance  12.26a; XII,2—XIII,2
  • Re New York Statute  12.26b; XII,2
  • Fine Arts Guild v Seattle  12.27; XII,2—XIV,1; 445 P2d 602 (Wash Sup Ct 1968)
  • Columbia Pictures v Chicago  12.28; XIII,2
  • Re 41st St Theater  12.29; XIII,2
  • Interstate Circuit Inc v Dallas; United Artists Corp v Dallas  12.30; XIII,2; 402 SW2d 770 (Tex Ct of Civ App), rev'd & rem 390 US 676 (1968)
  • Demich v Alioto  (12.31); I ACQ 41
13. Of Peddlers, Literature Tables (and 112, 152)
  • Chicago v Falk  13.1; VI,102
  • Indianola v Defs  13.2; IX,1—X,1
  • Fort Worth v Craik, Dist Judge  13.3; XIII,2; 411 SW2d 541 (Tex Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • City of Bowling Green v Lodico  13.4; XIII,3; 216 NE2d 880 (Ohio Sup Ct 1967), 228 NE2d 325 (Ohio Sup Ct 1967)
  • Beverly Hills v Timmons  13.6; XIV,1
14. Of Books, Magazines (and 21, 22, 52, 151, 152)
  • Berenson v Detroit  (14.a); MCLL
  • Ayn Rand v Hearst Co  (14.b); MCLL
  • New York v Hennacy  (14.c), 20.1; I,1; 127 NE2d 870 (NY Ct of App 1955); ACLU
  • Adams v Hinkle  (14.d), 23.7; III,2,67; 322 P2d 844 (Wash Sup Ct 1958)
  • Sunshine Book Co v McCafferey  14.1; II,31—III,21; ACLU
  • Denton v Carrolton, Ga  14.2; II,32; 235 F2d 481 (CA 5 1956)
  • Florida v Tracy  14.4; III,21
  • Mounce v US  14.5; III,46—IV,2; 247 F2d 148 (CA 9 1957), vac and rem 355 US 180 (1958)
  • Ohio v Walton  14.6; III,46
  • Mid-Continent News Co v Mayor Norick, Literary Review Bd  14.7; V,72
  • Atty Genl v The Book Named "Tropic of Cancer"  14.9; VII,2—X,87; 184 NE2d 328 (Mass Sup Jud Ct 1962)
  • Haiman v Morris  14.10; VII,2—X,133; MCLL; ACLU
  • Grove Press, Henry Miller v Morris  14.10a; VII,69—X,133
  • Grove Press v Calissi  14.11; VII,36—X,87
  • Arnebergh v Zeitlin  14.12; VII,36—IX,74; 27 CR 320 (Calif Sup Ct 1963), cd 375 US 957 (1963); MCLL
  • Grove Press v Florida ex rel Gerstein  14.13; VII,69—IX,74; 376 US 961 (1964)
  • Ronsley v Stanczak  14.14; VIII,69,121
  • Larkin v G P Putnam's Sons  14.15; VIII,121—X,87; 252 NYS2d 71 (NY Ct of App 1964)
  • Tralins v Gerstein  14.16, 52.37; VI,81—IX, 74; 378 US 576 (1964)
  • Hudson Co News v Sills and Tumulty  14.17; IX,1—XI,1; 195 A2d 626 (NJ Sup Ct 1963), 378 US 583 (1964)
  • The National Insider v Chicago Transit Authority  14.18; IX,36; MCLL
  • Putnam's Sons, Inc v Calissi  14.19; X,87—XIV,2; 235 A2d 893 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
  • Pennsylvania v Robin  14.20; XI,59—XIII,3; 218 A2d 546 (Pa Sup Ct 1966); ACLU
  • Long v Anaheim  14.21; XII,2—XIV,2; 255 CA2d 191 (DCA 4 1967)
  • Rodale Press v Fed'l Trade Commn  14.22; XIII,3—XIV,2; 407 F2d 1252 (CA DC 1968); MCLL
  • Rose v Bd of Supervisors (Sacramento Co)  14.23; XIV,2
  • Ginsberg v New York  14.24; XIV,2; 290 NYS2d 239 (Nassau Co Dist Ct), aff'd 390 US 629 (1968)
15. Of Miscellaneous Activities
  • Federal Communications Commission v American Broadcasting  (15.a); 110 FSupp 374; 347 US 284 (1954); MCLL
  • New York v Ziegler  15.1; VI, 2
  • Simone v New York City Police Commr Kennedy  15.2; VI, 52, 80
  • New York v Figaro Cafe  15.3; VI, 102
  • Washington ex rel Seattle v Hon McGovern, Muni Ct Judge  15.4; VIII, 69
  • Baltimore v Moore  15.6; VIII, 121—XI, 50
  • Coleman v Torrance, Calif  15.7; IX, 1—X, 2
  • Canon v Justice Ct  15.8; IX, 36—X, 88; 39 CR 228 (Cal Sup Ct 1964)
  • San Francisco v Stephenson  15.9; IX, 74
  • California v Forbes  15.11; XI, 1—XII, 2
  • California v Camejo  15.15; XII, 2; MCLL
  • Tissot v Seattle  15.16; XII, 3
  • Concept East Theatre v Detroit  15.17; XII, 3
  • In re Bridge Theatre  15.18; XIII, 3
  • Residents of Yorktown Heights v Yorktown Heights School  15.19; XIII, 3
  • Chavez v Visalia Muni Ct  15.20; XIII, 3—XIV, 2; 64 Cal Rptr 76 (DCA 1967); MCLL
  • Sonoma Co v Gottlieb  15.21; XIII, 3
  • California v Barrows, Gist, Hay, Bright, McClure  15.22; XIV, 2; 301 FSupp 574 (CDCal 1968)
  • Dixon v Municipal Ct  15.22a; XIV, 2; 73 CR 587 (DCA 1968)
  • Perez v California  15.23; XIV, 3; 422 P2d 597 (Cal Sup Ct 1967), dism'd 395 US 208 (1969)
  • Philadelphia v Electric Factory, Inc  15.24; XIV, 3; MCLL
  • Sledge v SF Muni Ct  15.25; I ACQ 50
16. Of Parades (and 55, 63)
  • Darlington v Stanley  (16.a), 552.SC.9a; VI, 48—X, 128; 6 RRLR 798 (SC Sup Ct 1961)
  • Edwards v South Carolina  (16.b), 552.SC.3b; VII, 63—IX, 69; 123 SE2d 247 (SC Sup Ct 1961), cg 369 US 870 (1962); rev'd 372 US 229 (1963)
  • Brown v Rayfield  (16.c); 320 F2d 96, cd 375 US 902 (1963); MCLL
  • Hurwitt v Oakland  16.1; XI., 1; 247 FSupp 995 (ND Cal 1965); MCLL
  • Baldwin v Nosser  16.2; XI, 2—XIV, 3
  • Natchez v Easton  16.2a; XI, 2
  • Hicks v Cutrer  16.3; XII, 3—XIII, 3
  • Sumrall v Birdsong, Busby  16.4; XIII, 3
  • Bogalusa v 54 Defs  16.5; XIII, 3
  • South Bay Vietnam Summer v Torrance  16.6; XIV, 3
  • Chicago Peace Council v McDonough  16.7; XIV, 3; I ACQ 17; MCLL
  • Jeanette Rankin Brigade v Chief of Capitol Police  16.8; XIV, 3; 278 FSupp 233 (DC DC 1968), rev and rem 421 F2d 1090 (CA DC 1969)
  • Re Peace Parade Permits  16.9; XIV, 3
17. Of Mass Media (and 257)
  • FCC v Palmetto Broadcasting Co  (17.1), 15.5; VIII, 121—X, 88; 334 F2d 534 (CA DC 1964), cd 379 US 843 (1964); MCLL
  • Goldwater v FCC  (17.2), 15.10; X, 2, 88; cd 379 US 893 (1964)
  • Re KPFA  (17.3), 15.12; XI, 59; 2 FCC2d 1066 (1965)
  • United Church of Christ v FCC  (17.4), 15.13; XI, 59—XIV, 3; 1 FCC2d 1484 (1965); 359 F2d 994 (CA DC 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Rivers, Inc (WJAZ) v FCC  (17.5), 15.14; XII, 2; 351 F2d 194 (CA DC 1965)
  • Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith v FCC  17.6; XIV, 4; 403 F2d 169 (CA DC 1968), cd 394 US 930 (1969)
  • Red Lion Broadcasting Co v FCC; US v Radio Television News Directors Assoc  17.7; XIV, 4; I ACQ 30; 381 F2d 908 (CA DC 1967), aff'd 395 US 367 (1969); 400 F2d 1002 (CA 7 1968), rev'd 395 US 367 (1969); MCLL
  • New York State Broadcasters Ass'n v FCC  17.8; XIV, 4; 414 F2d 990 (CA 2 1969), cd 396 US 1061 (1970)
  • US v FCC  17.9; XIV, 4; MCLL; ACLU
  • Ackerman v Columbia Broadcasting System  17.10; XIV, 4; 301 FSupp 628 (SD NY 1969);
20. ADMINISTRATIVE RESTRICTIONS
21. By US Customs (and 12, 14)
  • US v 31 Photographs  21.1; II, 1—III, 22; 156 FSupp 350 (SD NY 1957)
  • Shapiro v Customs Bureau  21.2; VI, 52
  • Upham v Dill, Collector of Customs  21.3; VII, 2; 195 FSupp 5 (SD NY 1961)
  • Re John Schultz  21.4; VIII, 70
  • Teague v Regional Commr of Customs  21.5; XIII, 4—XIV, 4; I ACQ 17; 404 F2d 441 (CA 2), cd 394 US 977 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
22. By US Postmaster (and 12, 14)
  • Kris Studio, Inc v Day, Postmaster General  (22.a); MCLL
  • Tirone v Ramsey Journal and Russo  (22.b), 20.9; I, 34
  • Sunshine Book Co v Summerfield  (22.c), 14.3, 20.13; III, 21; 249 F2d 114 (CA DC 1957), rev'd 355 US 372 (1958); ACLU
  • HMH Publishing Co v Summerfield  22.1; IV, 2, 88
  • Hamilton v Summerfield  22.2; IV, 2, 40
  • Toberoff d/b/a Filmfare v Summerfield  22.3; IV, 40; 245 F2d 360 (CA 9 1957)
  • Toberoff v Summerfield  22.4; IV, 40; 256 F2d 91 (CA 9 1958)
  • Grove Press v Christenberry  22.5; IV, 68—V, 46; 175 FSupp 488 (SD NY 1959), aff'd 276 F2d 433 (CA 2 1960); ACLU
  • United Artists Corp v Post Office  22.6; IV, 68—V, 2
  • St Clair Co Comm for Better Race Relations v Cowles Magazines and Jefferson News Service  22.7; IV, 88—V, 72
  • Wirin v Summerfield  22.8; V, 2—VI, 80
  • Hughes v Schroeder  22.9; V, 22—VI, 80; MCLL
  • Rabin d/b/a Modern Book Store v Schroeder  22.10; V, 22—VI, 80; MCLL
  • Pls v Postmaster General  22.10a; VI, 52, 80
  • Big Table v Schroeder  22.11; V, 22—VI, 102; 186 FSupp 254 (ND Ill 1960); MCLL; ACLU
  • Four Star Publications v Erbe  22.12; V, 22—VII, 101; 304 F2d 872 (CA 8 1962); ACLU
  • US Post Office v "Tropic of Cancer"  22.13; VII, 2
  • Manuel Enterprises v Day  22.14; VII, 101—VIII, 92; 370 US 478 (1962)
  • Heilberg v Fixa  22.15; VIII, 122—X, 133; 381 US 301 (1965); MCLL
  • Amlin v Postmaster Gen  22.16; VIII, 122—X, 2
  • McReynolds, Pappenheim v Christenberry  22.17; IX, 36—X, 133; 233 FSupp 143 (SD NY 1964), cd 379 US 972 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Lamont d/b/a Basic Pamphlets v Postmaster General  22.18; X, 2, 88, 133; 229 FSupp 913 (1964), rev'd 381 US 301 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Re PO Employee  22.19; XIII, 4
23. On Government Information and Secrecy
  • New York Post v Judge Leibowitz  (23.1), 57.8; III, 23
  • New York Post Corp v Moses  23.11; VI, 53—VIII, 2; 176 NE2d 709 (NY Ct of App 1961); MCLL
  • Louisville Courier-Journal v Curtis  23.16; VI, 102—VII, 2; 335 SW2d 934 (Ky Ct of App 1959), cd 364 US 910 (1960)
  • Nevins v Chino  23.17; XI, 60
24. On Students and Professors (and 56, 62, 111, 262, 281, 342, 571)
ALABAMA
  • Dixon v Alabama State Bd of Educ  (24.Ala.1), 552.Ala.la; V, 99—VII, 62; 294 F2d 150 (CA 5 1961), cd 368 US 930 (1961); MCLL
  • Woods v Wright  (24.Ala.2), 24.32; IX, 2—X, 3; 334 F2d 369 (CA 5 1964)
  • Dickerson v Bd of Education (Alabama)  (24.Ala.4), 24.43; XI, 2; 10 RRLR 1003 (MD Ala 1965); 412 F2d 1183 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Johnson, McCants v Montgomery  (24.Ala.5), 24.43a; XI, 2—XIII, 5; 245 FSupp 25 (MD Ala 1965)
  • Chamless v Tuskegee  24.Ala.6, 24.70; XIII, 7—XIV, 5
  • Dickey v Alabama State Bd of Educ (Univ of Ala)  24.Ala.7; XIV, 5; 273 FSupp 613 (MD Ala 1967), 394 F2d 490 (CA 5 1968), 402 F2d 515 (CA 5 1968)
ALASKA
  • Watts v Seward School Bd  24.Alaska.1, 24.81; XIII, 8—XIV, 5; 421 P2d 586 (Alaska Sup Ct 1966), vac and rem 391 US 592 (1968); 454 P2d 732 (Alaska Sup Ct 1969)
ARIZONA
  • Re Dr Alan MacEwan (Univ of Ariz)  (24.Ariz.1), 262.4; VII, 9
  • Jones v Bd of Regents (Tucson)  24.Ariz.2,
  • Arizona State University v 3 Students  (24.Ariz.3), 24.69; XIII, 7
ARKANSAS
  • Freeman v Gould Special School Dist  24.Ark.1, 571.59; XIII, 177—XIV, 5; 405 F2d 1153 (CA 8 1969), cd 396 US 843 (1969)
CALIFORNIA
  • Peck v Regents, Univ of California  (24.Calif.1), 14.8; VI, 52, 79
  • Lessin v Regents, Univ of California, Chancellor Spieth—Riverside Campus  (24.Calif.2), 24.13; VII, 69—VIII, 92; MCLL
  • The Bd of Trustees, Lassen Union High School Dist v Owens  (24.Calif.3), 24.18, 262.2; V, 52—VIII, 3; 23 CR 710 (DCA 1962)
  • Re Gordon Lish (San Mateo Union High School Dist)  (24.Calif.4), 24.29; IX, 2
  • Finot v Pasadena Bd of Educ  24.31; IX, 2—XIII, 4; 58 Cal Rptr 520 (DCA 1967); MCLL
  • Kline v Myerson  (24.Calif.6), 24.36; X, 88; MCLL
  • California v Savio  (24.Calif.7), 24.37; X, 88—XIII, 4; cd 388 US 460 (1967); I ACQ 13-15; MCLL
  • In re Aptheker, Stein, Jacobs  (24.Calif.7a), 24.37a; XI, 60; MCLL
  • In re Bacon  (24.Calif.7aa); I ACQ 15; aff'd 240 CA2d 34 (DCA 1966); MCLL
  • Eisen v Bd of Regents (Univ of California)  24.Calif.7b, 24.37b; XII, 3—XIV, 6; 75 Cal Rptr 45 (DCA 1969)
  • Stanton v Dumke  (24.Calif.8), 24.40; X, 134—XII, 3; vac 49 Cal Rptr 380 (Cal Sup Ct 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Peters, Cuddy, Friel, Kuchinsky, Namais (San Francisco City Coll)  (24.Calif.9), 24.45; XI, 2—XIII, 5
  • Re Geri Davis  (24.Calif.10), 24.47; XI, 61
  • In re Owen  (24.Calif.11), 24.48; XI, 61
  • Re Mark Miltenberger  (24.Calif.12), 24.52; XI, 61
  • Thompson v Redondo High School Dist  (24.Calif.13), 24.53c; XII, 4—XIII, 5
  • Goldberg v Regents of Univ of California  (24.Calif.14), 24.54; XI, 61—XIII, 5; 57 Cal Rptr 463 (DCA 1967)
  • Athos v Fremont Bd of Educ  24.Calif.15, 24.63; XIII, 6—XIV, 6; MCLL
  • Myers v Bd of Educ (Arcata)  24.Calif.16, 24.64; XIII, 6—XIV, 6; 75 Cal Rptr 68 (DCA 1969); MCLL
  • Akin v Bd of Educ (Riverside)  24.Calif.17, 24.65; XIII, 6—XIV, 6; 68 Cal Rptr 557 (DCA 1968), cd 393 US 1041 (1969)
  • Bock, Anderson v Murphy  (24.Calif.18), 24.73; XIII, 7
  • McGlone v Mt Diablo Unified School Dist  24.Calif.19, 24.75; XIII, 7—XIV, 6; 82 Cal Rptr 225 (DCA 1969); MCLL
  • Joslyn v Claremont Graduate School  (24.Calif.19a), 24.76; XIII, 7; MCLL
  • Robinson v Sacramento School Dist  (24.Calif.19b), 24.77; XIII, 7; 53 Cal Rptr 781 (DCA 1966)
  • Perlman v Bd of Trustees (Shasta Joint Jr College Dist)  24.Calif.20; XIV, 6; MCLL
  • UCLA Student Conduct Comm  24.Calif.21; XIV, 6
  • Sellers v Bd of Regents (Univ of California)  24.Calif.23; XIV, 6; I ACQ 25; MCLL; ACLU
  • Dunbar v Governing Bd (Grossmont Jr College Dist)  24.Calif.24; XIV, 6; 79 CR 662 (DCA 1969)
  • Scarbrough v Bd of Educ (San Francisco)  24.Calif.25; XIV, 7; MCLL
  • Smiley v Thompson (Soquel High School)  24.Calif.26; XIV, 7
  • In re Carter, (San Francisco State College)  24.Calif.27; XIV, 7; MCLL
  • N Orange Co Junior College Dist v Nighswonger  24.Calif.28; XIV, 7
  • Palo Verde Jr College v Hensey  24.Calif.29; XIV,7
  • Olff v East Side Union High School District (San Jose)  24.Calif.30; XIV,7; 305 FSupp 557 (ND Cal 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Allen v Oakland Unified School Dist  24.Calif.31; XIV,7; MCLL
  • California v Jones  24.Calif.32; XIV,7
  • Modesto v San Jacinto Unified School Dist  24.Calif.33; XIV,7; MCLL
  • San Francisco State Strike  24.Calif.34; XIV,7; MCLL
  • Wong v Hayakawa  24.Calif.34a; XIV,8; MCLL
  • Isman v Bd of Regents (Univ of California)  24.Calif.35; XIV,8
  • Siegel v Regents of University of California  24.Calif.36; XIV,8; I ACQ 49; 308 FSupp 832 (ND Cal 1970); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Yank (Univ of California)  24.Calif.37; XIV,8
  • California v Camejo, Bloom, Glusman  24.Calif.38; XIV,8
  • Furutani v Ewigleben  24.Calif.39; XIV,9; 297 FSupp 1163 (ND Cal 1969)
  • California v Queen, Martinet  24.Calif.40; XIV,9
  • California v Wright, Margaret  24.Calif.41; XIV,9
  • Averett v Bd of Educ (Los Angeles)  24.Calif.41a; XIV,9; MCLL
  • California v Mallory, Wilson  24.Calif.42; XIV,9; I ACQ 46; MCLL
  • California v Agnello  24.Calif.43; XIV,9; 66 CR 571 (DCA 1968)
  • Brennan v Nicasio School Dist  24.Calif.44; XIV,9
  • Strickland v SF Bd of Education  24.Calif.45; I ACQ 50
COLORADO
  • Buttny v Smiley (Univ of Colorado)  24.Colo.1; XIV,9; 36 US Law Week 2571 (1968), 281 FSupp 280 (DC Colo 1968)
  • Jones v Hopper (S Colo State College)  24.Colo.2; XIV,9; 410 F2d 1323 (CA 10 1969), 38 US Law Week 3078, cd 397 US 991 (1970)
  • Browns v Mitchell  24.Colo.3; XIV,9; 409 F2d 593 (CA 10 1969)
CONNECTICUT
  • Bourne v Rousseau (Norwalk Bd of Educ)  24.Conn.1; XIV,10
  • Roach v Connecticut  24.Conn.2; XIV,10; I ACQ 29; cd 395 US 979 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Pls v Dist of Columbia School Bd, Fedl Dist Ct Judges  (24.DC.1), 24.50; XI,61
  • Healey v Keppel  (24.DC.2), 24.83; XIII,8
  • US Nat'l Students Assn v Finch  24.DC.3; XIV,10; MCLL
  • Hare v Howard University  24.DC.4; XIV,10; 271 FSupp 609 (DC DC 1967), 412 F2d 1128 (CA DC 1969)
  • Greene v Howard University  24.DC.5; XIV,10; 271 FSupp 609 (DC DC 1967), 412 F2d 1128 (CA DC 1969)
FLORIDA
  • Due v Florida A & M Univ  (24.Fla.1), 24.34; IX,74; 233 FSupp 396 (ND Fla 1963)
GEORGIA
  • Re Albany State College  (24.Ga.1), 24.14; VII,69
  • Adams v Bd of Educ, Stephens Co  (24.Ga.2), 24.28; IX,2
ILLINOIS
  • Koch v Bd of Trs of the U of Ill  (24.Ill.1), 24.20, 30.10; VI,103—IX,74; 187 NE2d 340 (Ill App Ct 1963), cd 375 US 989 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pickering v Bd of Educ (Will Co)  24.Ill.2, 24.56; XII,4—XIV,10; 225 NE2d 1 (Ill Sup Ct 1967), rev'd and rem 391 US 563 (1968)
  • Snyder v Bd of Trustees of Univ of Illinois  24.Ill.3, 24.59; XII,4—XIV,10; 286 F Supp 927 (ND Ill 1968)
  • Chicago v Swenson  (24.Ill.4), 24.71; XIII,7
  • Scoville v Bd of Educ, Joliet Township H S Dist 204  24.Ill.5; XIV,10; 286 FSupp 988 (ND Ill 1968)
  • Univ of Illinois v Finamore, Lara  24.Ill.6; XIV,10
IOWA
  • Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School Dist  24.Ia.1, 24.62a; XIII,6—XIV,10; 258 FSupp 971 (SD Iowa 1966), 383 F2d 988 (CA 8 1967), rev'd and rem 393 US 503 (1969)
KENTUCKY
  • Golden, Detwyler and Mahin, Norman and Boyd v Ky State College  (24.Ky.1), 262.5; VII,9—IX,14
  • Atty General's Opinion (Kentucky)  24.Ky.2; XIV,11; MCLL
  • John S Hodge v Principal, Valley High School, J C Cantrell and Jefferson Co Bd of Educ  (24.Ky.3), 24.53a; XII,3—XIII,5
LOUISIANA
  • Clark v Bd of Admrs, Tulane Univ  (24.La.1), 24.16; VII,102—VIII,3
  • Morial v Orleans Parish School Bd  (24.La.2), 24.30; IX,2—XIII,4
  • McCoy v Louisiana State Bd of Educ  (24.La.4), 24.38; X,89; 229 FSupp 735 (ED La 1964), rev'd and rem 345 F2d 720 (CA 5 1965)
  • Zanders v Louisiana State Bd of Educ  24.La.5; XIV,11; 36 US Law Week 2570, 281 FSupp 747 (WD La 1968)
MARYLAND
  • Parker v Bd of Educ (Prince Georges Co, Md)  (24.Md.1), 24.42; X,134—XII,3; 237 FSupp 222 (DC Md 1965), aff'd 348 F2d 464 (CA 4 1965), cd 382 US 1030 (1966); connected 384 F2d 873 (CA 4 1967)
  • Johns v Bd of Educ (Baltimore)  24.Md.2; XIV,11
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Leonard v School Committee of Attelboro  (24.Mass.1), 24.53; XI,61; 212 NE2d 468 (Mass Sup Jud Ct 1965)
  • In re M Ridgeley Clark  (24.Mass.2), 24.62; XIII,6
  • Sturm v Bd of Trs (Boston University)  24.Mass.3; XIV,11
  • Massachusetts v Harvard Demonstrators  24.Mass.4; XIV,11
MICHIGAN
  • Zarichny v State Bd of Agriculture  (24.Mich.a); 18 LW 3014 (Mich Sup Ct 1949), cd 338 US 816 (1949); MCLL
  • Waring v Dexter Comm School Dist and Bd of Educ  (24.Mich.1), 24.19; VII,43—VIII,3
  • Helmkay v Flint Bd of Educ  (24.Mich.2), 24.22; VIII,3,70; MCLL
  • Wolfson v Wayne State Univ  (24.Mich.3), 24.44; XI,2; MCLL
  • Schiff v Michigan State Univ  (24.Mich.4), 24.46; XI,3—XII,3; 282 FSupp 381 (WD Mich 1966); MCLL
  • TAE Assn v Birmingham Bd of Educ  (24.Mich.5), 24.61; XII,4—XIII,6
  • Reeve v Bd of Educ (Wyandotte)  24.Mich.6; XIV,11
MINNESOTA
  • Minnesota ex rel Landin v School Bd of Ind School Dist No 720, Shakopee  (24.Minn.1), 262.3; VII,9; MCLL
MISSISSIPPI
  • Burnside v Byars  (24.Miss.1), 24.41; X,134—XIII,5; 363 F2d 744 (CA 5 1966)
  • Evers v Birdsong  (24.Miss.2), 24.55; XI,61—XII,4; 287 FSupp 900 (SD Miss 1968); MCLL
  • Cohen v Mississippi State Univ of Agr and Applied Science  (24.Miss.3), 24.57; XII,4; 256 FSupp 954 (ND Miss 1966)
  • Stacy v Williams  (24.Miss.4), 24.79; XIII,7; 306 FSupp 963 (ND Miss 1969), 312 FSupp 742 (ND Miss 1970), 50 FRD 52 (ND Miss 1970)
  • Evers v Bd of Trs (Univ of Mississippi)  24.Miss.5; XIV,11
  • Wilson v White (Mississippi Valley State College)  24.Miss.6; XIV,12
  • Perry v Grenada Muni Separate School Dist  24.Miss.7; XIV,12; 300 FSupp 748 (ND Miss 1969)
MISSOURI
  • Re Lincoln Univ Students  (24.Mo.1), 24.17; VII,102
  • Estaban v Central Missouri State College  (24.Mo.2), 24.85; XIII,8; 277 FSupp 649 (WD Mo 1967), dism'd 290 FSupp 622 (WD Mo 1968), aff'd 415 F2d 1077 (CA 8 1969); MCLL
  • Scoggin v Lincoln University  24.Mo.3; XIV,12; 291 FSupp 161 (WD Mo 1968), 45 FRD 133 (1968); MCLL
NEW JERSEY
  • West Windsor School Bd v Trifan  (24.NJ.1), 23.15; VI,80,102
  • Bd of Educ (Edison Township) v New Jersey State Bd of Educ and Bertin  (24.NJ.3), 24.67; XIII,6
  • Pelletreau v Bd of Educ (New Milford)  24.NJ.4; XIV,12
NEW MEXICO
  • Oliphant v New Mexico Jr College Bd  24.NMex.1; XIV,12
NEW YORK
  • Steier v New York State Educ Comm'r  (24.NY.a); 271 F2d 13 (CA 2 1959), cd 361 US 966 (1960)
  • McCaffrey v NYC Bd of Educ  (24.NY.1), 123.27; VIII,129
  • Lee v New York State Univ Bd of Trustees  (24.NY.2), 262.6; VII,43
  • Re Newtown High School Senior  (24.NY.3), 64.2; VI,55
  • Worley v Commr Allen  (24.NY.4), 23.14; VI,80; 212 NYS2d 236 (App Div 1961)
  • Egan v Moore, Trs, State U of NY  (24.NY.5), 24.21; VIII,3—IX,36; 245 NYS2d 622 (App Div 1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Tedi Farber  (24.NY.6), 24.23; VIII,3
  • Council v Donovan, NYC Supt of Schools  (24.NY.7), 123.26; VIII,73—IX,10; MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Vivian Anderson  (24.NY.8), 24.49; XI,61
  • Shields v St Johns Univ  (24.NY.9), 24.58; XII,4
  • Hodes v Garrison  (24.NY.10), 24.74; XII,7; MCLL
  • New York v 6 Cornell Students  (24.NY.11), 24.78; XIII,7
  • Puentes v Bd of Educ of Union Free Sch Dist #21  24.NY.12, 24.80; XIII,7—XIV,12; 226 NE2d 701 (NY Ct of App 1967), vac and rem 392 US 653 (1968)
  • Bd of Educ v Brennan (Mineola)  24.NY.13; XIV,12
  • Rosenberg v Allen  24.NY.14; XIV,12; 258 FSupp 511 (SD NY 1966); MCLL
  • Columbia University 1968  24.NY.15; XIV,12
  • Hayes v Hogan (Columbia)  24.NY.15a; XIV,13; MCLL
  • New York v Sargent, Ziegellaub (Columbia)  24.NY.15b; XIV,13; MCLL
  • Halliwell v Criminal Court (Columbia)  24.NY.15c; XIV,13; MCLL
  • Grossner v Trustees of Columbia Univ  24.NY.15d; XIV,13; 287 FSupp 535 (SD NY 1968); MCLL
  • Conservative Students v Bd of Trs (Columbia)  24.NY.15e; XIV,13
  • Goldman v Columbia Univ  24.NY.15f; XIV,13
  • Cole v Bd of Trs of Columbia Univ  24.NY.15g; XIV,13; 300 FSupp 1026 (SD NY 1969); MCLL
  • Columbia Univ Trs v SDS  24.NY.16; XIV,14
  • New York v Queens College Students  24.NY.17; XIV,14
  • New York v 9 CCNY Students  24.NY.18; XIV,14
  • CCNY Students v Gallagher  24.NY.18a; XIV,14
  • Howard v Clark  24.NY.19; XIV,14; 299 NYS2d 65 (NY Sup Ct 1969)
  • Chuff v Bd of Educ of Cent Sch Dist #2  24.NY.20; XIV,14; 290 NYS2d 25 (Sup Ct, App Div 1968), cd 394 US 921 (1969)
  • Powe v Miles  24.NY.21; XIV,14; 294 FSupp 1269 (WD NY 1968), 407 F2d 73 (CA 2 1968)
  • Zucker v Panitz  24.NY.22; XIV,14; 299 FSupp 102 (SD NY 1969)
  • Jones v Vassar College  24.NY.23; XIV,14; 299 NYS2d 283 (NY Sup Ct 1969)
  • Drucker v New York University  24.NY.24; XIV,14; 293 NYS2d 923 (Queens Co Cir Ct 1968), rev'd 300 NYS2d 749 (NY App Div Sup Ct 1969)
  • New York v Cornell Students  24.NY.25; XIV,15
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Dickson v Sitterson (Univ of NC)  24.NC.1, 24.60; XII,4—XIV,15; 280 FSupp 486 (MD NC 1968)
OHIO
  • Wilkinson, Schwartz v Bd of Trs, Ohio State U  (24.Ohio.1), 24.27; VIII,122—XI,2; motion den Schwartz v Underwood, 377 US 961 (1964); MCLL
  • Scisum v Dick (Woodward High School, Toledo)  24.Ohio.2; XIV,15
  • Warren v Groves (Central State Univ)  24.Ohio.3; XIV,15
OKLAHOMA
  • Re Dr Ronald Yates  (24.Okla.1), 24.15; VII,69
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Re Cutrie  (24.Pa.1), 24.72; XIII,7
  • Harris v Bd of Educ (Haverford)  (24.Pa.2), 24.66; XIII,6; MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Byrd v Gary  (24.SC.1), 24.25, 552.SC.9; VI,48—X,3 184 FSupp 388 (ED SC 1960)
  • Re Gloria Rackley  (24.SC.2), 24.33; IX,37
  • Williams v Sumter School Dist  (24.SC.3), 24.35; X,3,88
TENNESSEE
  • Kinght v Tenn Bd of Educ  (24.Tenn.1), 24.24; VIII,3,70
  • Smith v Ellington (Univ of Tennessee)  24. Tenn.2; XIV,15; 300 FSupp 777 (ED Tenn 1969)
  • Norton v Discipline Comm (E Tenn State Univ)  24.Tenn.3; XIV,15; MCLL
TEXAS
  • Ritter v Matthews  (24.Tex.1), 24.26; VIII,70—X,3; 9 RRLR 615 (ED Tex 1964)
  • ACLU v Texas  (24.Tex.2), 24.68; XIII,7
  • Sterzing v Ft Bend Bd of Educ  24.Tex.5; XIV,15; I ACQ 25; MCLL
  • Bennett v Costlow (Bd of Educ, Houston)  24. Tex.6; XIV,15
  • Ferrell v Dallas Independent School Dist  24.Tex.7; XIV,15; 261 FSupp 545 (ND Tex), 392 F2d 697 (CA 5), cd 393 US 856 (1968)
  • Wright v Texas Southern U  24.Tex.8, 24.84; XIII,8—XIV,15; 277 FSupp 110 (SD Tex 1967), aff'd 392 F2d 728 (CA 5 1968)
VIRGINIA
  • Marshall v Oliver  (24.Va.1), 24.53d; XXII,4—XIII,5; cd 385 US 945 (1966)
WASHINGTON
  • Lauer v Gundlach (U of Washington 1948)  (24.Wash.a); MCLL
  • Washington ex rel Richard G Jones v Bruno, Supt of Public Inst  (24.Wash.1), 22.12, 25.12; VI,53—VIII,70
  • Poll v Knorr  (24.Wash.2), 24.53b; XII,3—XIII,5
WEST VIRGINIA
  • Barker v Hardway (Bluefield State College)  24.W Va.1; XIV,16; I ACQ 17; 283 FSupp 228 (SD W Va 1968), 399 F2d 638 (CA 4 1968), cd 394 US 905 (1969); MCLL
WISCONSIN
  • Marzette v McPhee (Wisconsin State Univ—Oshkosh)  24.Wisc.1; XIV,16; 294 FSupp 562 (WD Wisc 1968)
  • Lee v Bd of Regents (Wisconsin State Univ)  24.Wisc.2; XIV,16; 306 FSupp 1097 (WD Wisc 1968)
  • Soglin v Kauffman (U of Wisc)  24.Wisc.3; XIV,16; 286 FSupp 851, 295 FSupp 978 (WD Wisc 1968), 418 F2d 163 (CA 7 1969)
  • Breen v Kahl  24.Wisc.4; XIV,16; 296 FSupp 702 (WD Wisc 1969), 419 F2d 1034 (CA 7 1969); MCLL
25. On Miscellaneous Activities
  • Walker v Mayor D'Alesandro  (25.1), 23.2; II,1—III,2; 129 A2d 148 (Md Ct of App 1957)
  • Popular Library v Pros Atty Hamm, St Clair Co  (25.2), 23.3; II,36,65
  • H M H Publishing Co v Pros Atty Hamm, St Clair Co  (25.3), 23.4; II,32,65
  • Random House and Bantam Books v Detroit Police Comm'r Piggins  (25.4), 23.5; II,49—IV,40
  • Sapriel v Beverly Hills  (25.5), 23.6; II,50—III,67
  • Werner v Knoxville  (25.6), 23.8; III,67—V,72
  • Mansare v Los Angeles Bd of Police Comm'rs  (25.7), 23.13; VI,53,80
  • Shuttlesworth v Connor  25.9; VI,2—VIII, 70; 5 RRLR 1150 (ND Ala 1960), aff'd 291 F2d 217 (CA 5 1961)
  • Smith v Cremins  25.10; VI,52—IX,37
  • Belshaw v Berkeley  25.11; VIII,122—X, 89; 54 CR 727 (DCA 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Forstner v Civil Service Comm (City and Co of San Francisco)  25.12; IX,37—XIII,8; 52 CR 621 (DCA 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Roberts v US  25.13; X,89,134; 332 F2d 892 (CA 8 1964), cd 380 US 980 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Percikof v New York Parks Dept  25.14; X,134—XII,5; 263 NYS 2d 673 (NYS Ct of App 1965)
  • Sokol v Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co  25.15; XII,5—XIII,8; 53 Cal Rptr 673 (Cal Sup Ct 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • NYCLU v New York Telephone Co  25.16; XII,5—XIII,8
  • Huntley v Public Utilities Comm of California  25.16a; XII,5—XIV,16; 69 CR 605 (Cal Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
  • Minneapolis Fed of Teachers v Obermyers  25.17; XII,5—XIII,9; 144 NW2d 789 (Sup Ct of Minn 1966)
  • Bagley v Washington Township Hospital District  25.18; XII,5—XIII,9; 55 Cal Rptr 401 (Cal Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • Firestone v 1st Dist Dental Society  25.19; XII,5—XIII,9
  • Hillside Community Church v Tacoma  25.20; XII,5—XIV,16; 455 P2d 350 (Wash Sup Ct 1969)
  • Kissinger v New York Transit Authority  25.20a; XII,5—XIII,9; 274 FSupp 438 (SD NY 1967); MCLL
  • Wirta v Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District  25.20b; XII,5—XIII,9; 434 P2d 982 (Cal Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 61 CR 419 (CA 1 Div 1 1967), vac 64 CR 430 (Cal Sup Ct 1967)
  • Tepedino v Dumpson  25.21; XII,5—XIII,9
  • Council on Religion and Homosexual v California State Fair  25.22; XII,5—XIII,9
  • Barbour v Sheet Metal Workers Intl Assn  25.23; XIII,9; 263 FSupp 724 (ED Mich 1966), rev'd 401 F2d 152 (CA 6 1968)
  • 5th Ave Vietnam Peace Parade Committee v New York Port Authority  25.25; XIII,9
  • Gray v Macy  25.26; XIII,9; 239 FSupp 658 (DC Ore 1965), rev'd 358 F2d 742 (CA 9 1966)
  • In re State Bar Rules  25.27; XIII,9
  • NAACP v KNEW, Michaels  25.28; XIII,9
  • Overseas Media Corp v McNamara  25.30; XIII,10—XIV,17; 259 FSupp 162 (DC DC 1967), 385 F2d 308 (CA DC 1967)
  • Lucke v Davis  25.31; XII,10—XIV,17; 228 A2d 313 (Md Ct of App 1967), cd 392 US 926 (1968)
  • Marshall v Sawyer  25.32; XIII,10; 365 F2d 105 (CA 9 1962), cd 385 US 1006 (1967)
  • Re Mural  25.33; XIII,10
  • NAB v FCC  25.34; XIV,17; 405 F2d 1082 (CA DC), cd 396 US 842 (1969)
  • Oliver v Southern California Rapid Transit Dist  25.35; XIV,17; MCLL
  • Friends Meeting v US  25.36; XIV,17
  • Mayberry v Kaiser  25.37; XIV,17
  • 111 Wines and Liquors, Murphy's Tavern, Val's Bar v Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control  25.38; XIV,17; 235 A2d 12 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
  • Koehl v Resor  25.39; XIV,17; 296 FSupp 558 (ED Va 1969), 417 F2d 1338 (CA 4 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Novak v Los Angeles Fire Dept  25.40; XIV,17
  • Fishkin v US Civil Service Commn  25.41; XIV,17; 309 FSupp 40 (ND Cal 1969)
  • Lefcourt v Legal Aid Society  25.42; XIV,17; 312 FSupp 1105 (SD NY 1968)
  • LA Free Press v Los Angeles  25.43; XIV,18
  • California v Beagarie  25.44; XIV,18
  • Hitchcock, Ralls v Marin Co  25.45; XIV,18
30. ECONOMIC RESTRICTIONS (and 251, 261, 268, 281, 571)
  • Wilson v US Civil Service Comm  (30.a), 10.23; I, 68; 136 FSupp 104 (DC DC 1955)
  • Independent Production Corp and I P C Distributors v Loew's  30.1; I,88—X,134; 283 F2d 730 (CA 2 1960); MCLL
  • Rubenstein and Richard v NYC Police Comm'r Kennedy, Trs of NYC Pension Fund  30.2; III,22—V,22; ACLU
  • Comm to Secure Justice for Morton Sobell v Tavern-on-the-Green Restaurant and City Parks Commr Morris  30.3; III,67—VIII,4; 185 FSupp 727 (SD NY 1960)
  • Baltimore v Abell  30.4; IV,40; 145 A2d 111 (Md Ct of App 1958)
  • Wagner v Post Office  30.5; VI,2—IX,37
  • Pranger v Break  30.5a; VI,102—VII,2; 9 CR 293 (Calif DCA 1961), cd 366 US 964 (1961)
  • Eustace v Day, Postmaster General and US Civil Service Comm  30.6; VI,2—IX,2; 198 FSupp 233 (DC DC 1963), aff'd 307 F2d 397 (CA DC 1963)
  • Young v Motion Picture Assn of America  30.7; VI,53—X,134; 299 F2d 199 (CA DC 1961), cd 370 US 922 (1961); MCLL
  • Ciepley v Intl Assn of Machinists  30.8; VI,80—VIII,92
  • Mitchell v Intl Assn of Machinists  30.9; VI,8—VIII,4; 16 CR 813 (DCA 1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Steck v Connally  30.11; VII,36
  • Allure Shoe Corp & Local 885  30.12; VII,102—VIII,70; 138 NLRB 395 (1962); MCLL
  • Turn Toward Peace v Al Molaikan Temple  30.13; VIII,4—X,134
  • Fort v Alameda (Calif)  30.14; VIII,92—IX,75; 392 P2d 385 (Calif Sup Ct 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Kinnear v San Francisco  30.14a; IX,75; 392 P2d 391 (Calif Sup Ct 1964)
  • Weaver v Jordan  30.15; X,134—XIII,10; 411 P2d 289 (Cal Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 844 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • NAACP v Overstreet  30.16; XI,3—XII,6; 142 SE 2d 816 (Ga Sup Ct 1965), cg 382 US 937 (1965), cert dism'd as improvidently granted 384 US 118 (1966); MCLL
  • Smith v SNCC  30.17; XI,3—XIII,10; 382 F2d 9 (CA 5 1967); 421 F2d 522 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Hurwitz v Directors Guild of America, Inc  30.18; XI,61—XIII,10; 62 LRRM 2653; rev'd and rem 364 F2d 67 (CA 2 1966), cd 385 US 971 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Virginia Collins  30.19; XII,6—XIII,10
  • US v Lenske (Portland, Ore)  30.20; XII,6—XIII,10; rev'd 383 F2d 20 (CA 9 1967); MCLL
  • Re Mikesell, Berg, Pimentel  30.21; XIII,11
  • Meehan v Macy  30.22; XIV,18; rem 392 F2d 822 (CA DC 1966); on recon 425 F2d 469, reh'g 425 F2d 472 (CA DC 1968)
  • Salt Lake City Fire Fighters v Salt Lake City  30.23; XIV,18; 449 P2d 239 (Utah Sup Ct 1969), cd 395 US 906 (1969)
40. CONTEMPT (and 63, 330-337, 390-394)
41. Of Federal Courts
  • US v Crockett, Jr  (41.a); MCLL; NLG
  • Levine v US  (41.b); 362 US 610 (1960)
  • Offutt v US  (41.c); 208 F2d 842 (CA DC), rev'd 348 US 11 (1954)
  • Garland v Torre  41.1; III,22—V,2; 259 F2d 545 (CA 2 1958), cd 358 US 910 (1958)
  • In re McConnell  41.2; VII,102; 370 US 230 (1962)
  • US v Barnett  41.3; IX,75—X,4; 376 US 681 (1964)
  • US v Barnett  41.3a; X,89—XI,3; 346 F2d 99 (CA 5 1965), 10 RRLR 531 (1965); ACLU
  • New York v Bonanno  41.4; X,89
  • Maddox v Willis  41.5; X,89—XI,62; app dis 382 US 18 (1965)
  • US v Keyes, Bassin  41.6; X,89
  • US v Cox  41.7; X,134—XI,3; 342 F2d 167 (CA 5 1965), cd 381 US 935 (1965); MCLL
  • Harris v US  41.8; XI,62—XIII,11; 334 F2d 460 (CA 2 1965), rev'd 382 US 162 (1965)
  • In re Grand Jury Investigation of Sam Giancana  41.9; XII,6; 352 F2d 921 (CA 7 1965), cd 382 US 959 (1965)
  • US v Chandler  41.10; XIII,11; 380 F2d 993 (CA 2 1967)
  • Cheff v Schnackenberg  41.11; XIII,11; 341 F2d 548 (CA 7 1965), aff'd 384 US 373 (1966)
  • Shillitani, Pappadio v US  41.12; XIII,11; 235 FSupp 887 (SD NY 1964), 345 F2d 290 (CA 2 1965), 346 F2d 5 (CA 2 1965), vac and dism'd 384 US 364 (1966)
  • Frank v US  41.14; XIV,18; 384 F2d 276 (CA 10 1967), aff'd 395 US 147 (1969)
41.100. FEDERAL GAG RULE
  • US v Tijerina  41.101; XIV,18; 412 F2d 661 (CA 10 1969), cd 396 US 867 (1969)
42. Of State Courts
  • Florida ex rel Huie v Lewis  (42.a), 20.5; I,2; ACLU
  • Reiss v New York  (42.b), 10.2; I,67; 351 US 922 (1956)
  • In re Howard  (42.c), 20.8; I,33,68; 289 P2d 537 (Calif DCA 1955)
  • In re Bozorth  (42.d), 20.10; I,51; 118 A2d 430 (NJ Super Ct 1955)
  • In Matter of Nies  42.1; II,50
  • Common Pleas Judge Thomas v Cleveland Press and Cleveland Plain Dealer  42.2; V,46
  • Colorado v Murphy  42.3; VI,3,80; cd 365 US 843 (1961)
  • Georgia v Atlanta Newspapers  42.4; VI,3—VII,3; 116 SE2d 580 (Ga Sup Ct 1960)
  • Evers v Mississippi  42.5; VI,53—VII,3; 131 So2d 653 (Miss Sup Ct 1961)
  • In re Goodfader  42.6; VII,36,70; 367 P2d 472 (Hawaii Sup Ct 1961)
  • Arkansas v Howard  42.7; VII,70
  • Mississippi v Bevel  42.8; VII,70
  • Mississippi v L Brown and J Harris  42.8a; VII,102
  • Wood v Georgia  42.9; VII,102; 370 US 375 (1962)
  • In re Green's Petition  42.10; VII,102; 369 US 689 (1962)
  • Louisiana v Defs (East Baton Rouge)  42.11; VIII,4
  • Holt, Dawley v Virginia  42.12; VIII,70—X, 134; 136 SE2d 809 (Va Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 381 US 131 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Taylor & Selby  42.13; VIII,92—IX,37; 193 A2d 181 (Pa Sup Ct 1963)
  • Johnson v Virginia  42.14; VIII,92; 373 US 61 (1963)
  • George v Clemmons  42.15; VIII,93; 373 US 241 (1963)
  • In re Tobias Simon  42.16; IX,3; MCLL
  • Hamilton v Alabama  42.17; IX,3,37; 376 US 650 (1964)
  • New Mexico v Morris, Harrison  42.18; X,4—XI,62; 406 P2d 349 (NMex Sup Ct 1965)
  • Ungar v Sarafite  42.19; IX,75; 376 US 575 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Maryland v Murray  42.20; X,89—XI,3
  • Kentucky v Taylor  42.21; X,89—XI,62
  • Robinson v Alabama  42.22; X,90; 168 So2d 491 (1964)
  • Stallworth, Bevel, Goldsby v Clark  42.23; X,90
  • Indiana v Neal  42.24; X,135—XIII,11
  • In re Jankunis  42.25; XI,62—XIII,11; MCLL
  • Oregon v Buchanan  42.26; XII,6—XIII,11; 436 P2d 729 (Ore Sup Ct 1968), cd 392 US 905 (1968)
  • Chicago v Vidnjevich  42.27; XII,6—XIII,11
  • New York Co Lawyers' Assn v Dacey, Crown Pblsh  42.28; XIII,2; 282 NYS2d 985 (Sup Ct 1967), 283 NYS2d 984 (Sup Ct App Div 1967), 286 NYS2d 485 (CA NY 1967), rev'd 287 NYS2d 422 (CA NY 1967)
  • Salveson v Wilkins  42.29; XIII,12
  • Re David W Rees  42.30; XIII,12
  • People v DeStefano  42.31; XIII,12; 212 NE2d 368 (App Ct Ill 1965), cd 385 US 989 (1966)
  • Bloom v Illinois  42.32; XIII,12-XIV,18; 220 NE2d 475 (Ill Sup Ct 1966), rev'd and rem 391 US 194 (1968)
  • In re Kenneth V Cockrel  42.33; XIV,19; I ACQ 39; MCLL
  • Bd of Educ of City of NY v Shanker  42.34; XIV,19; 283 NYS2d 432, 548 (Sup Ct 1967), aff'd 286 NYS2d 453 (Sup Ct 1967)
  • In re Spencer  42.35; XIV,19; 223 So2d 672 (Sup Ct La 1969), aff'd 397 US 817 (1970); MCLL
  • In re Ravitz  42.36; XIV,19
  • Michigan v Porter  42.38; I ACQ 9, 10
42.100. STATE GAG RULE
  • Hamilton v Muni Ct for Berkeley-Albany Judicial Dist  42.101; XIV,19; 76 CR 168 (DCA 1969), cd 396 US 985 (1969); I ACQ 26
  • Edmundson v Tennessee ex rel Battle  42.102; XIV,19; cd 396 US 844 (1969)
43. Of Other Agencies (and 270-274, 330-337)
  • In re Murchison  (43.1), 525.1; I,22; 349 US 133 (1955)
  • Dawkins v Florida  43.2; XIV,19; 208 So2d 119 (Fla DCA 1 1968), cd 393 US 854 (1968)
  • Dawkins v Green  43.3; XIV,19; 285 FSupp 772 (ND Fla 1968), rev'd and rem 412 F2d 644 (CA 5 1969)
50. CRIMINAL SANCTIONS
51. Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses (and 16, 55)
ALABAMA
  • Alabama v Howard and McAllister  (51.Ala.a), 51.6; IV,68—V,2
  • Alabama v Howard, Jr  (51.Ala.b), 51.7; IV,68—V,2
  • Montgomery v Davidson; Cole v Montgomery  (51.Ala.c), 552.Ala.1; V,67—VII,30; MCLL
  • DuBose v Montgomery  (51.Ala.d), 552.Ala.2; VI,46,98; 6 RRLR 146 (Ala Ct of App 1961)
  • Montgomery v Crow  (51.Ala.e), 552.Ala.3; V,67,99
  • Rev Shuttlesworth v Birmingham  (51.Ala.f), 552.Ala.5; V,67—VIII,117; 134 So2d 213 (Ala Sup Ct 1961), rev'd 373 US 262 (1963)
  • Florence v Defendants  (51.Ala.g), 552.Ala.7; V,67
  • Katzenbach v McClung  (51.Ala.h), 552.Ala.12; X,77,127,162; 379 US 294 (1964)
  • Birmingham v Gober  (51.Ala.1), 552.Ala.8; V,99—VI,46
  • Alabama v Johnson (Talladega)  (51.Ala.2), 553.Ala.1; VII,123—XI,53; 173 So2d 824 (Ala Sup Ct 1965), 10 RRLR 558 (1965)
  • Alabama v 200 Defs (Selma)  (51.Ala.3), 51.45; IX,3—XIII,12
  • Hanson v Alabama (DeKalb Co)  (51.Ala.4), 51.60; X,6; 166 So2d 886 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • Alabama v Boone  51.Ala.5; XI,3—XIII,12
  • Alabama v Days  51.Ala.6; XI,3—XIII,12
  • Tuscaloosa v Bonner  51.Ala.7; XII,6—XIII,12
  • Recorder's Ct of Bessemer v Thomas, Stout  51.Ala.8; XII,6—XIII,12
  • Tuscaloosa v Crawford  51.Ala.9; XIII,12
  • Wright v Montgomery  51.Ala.10; XIII,12—XIV,20; 245 FSupp 17 (MD Ala 1965), 335 F2d 930 (CA 5 1966), cd 384 US 1009 (1966); 282 FSupp 291 (MD Ala 1968), 406 F2d 867 (CA 5 1969)
ARIZONA
  • Arizona v Suever  51.Ariz.1; XI,62
ARKANSAS
  • Little Rock v Defendants  (51.Ark.1), 552.Ark.1; V,67—VI,75
  • Lupper v Arkansas  (51.Ark.2), 552.Ark.2; VI, 75—X,127; 367 SW2d 750 (Ark Sup Ct 1963), cd 379 US 995 (1965)
CALIFORNIA
  • US v Sawyer, Shaaf  (51.Calif.a), 51.30; VII, 103
  • Talley v Los Angeles  (51.Calif.1), 51.4; IV,40—VI,103; 362 US 60 (1960)
  • California v Smith  (51.Calif.2), 51.5; IV, 68,89
  • California v White  (51.Calif.3), 51.10; V, 47,72
  • California v Meisenbach  (51.Calif.4), 51.11; V,47—VII,70; MCLL
  • California v Huss (Los Angeles)  51.Calif.5, 51.53; IX,38—XIII,12; 51 Cal Rptr 56 (DCA 2 1966)
  • California v Buice, Coleman, Nelson  (51.Calif.6), 51.66; X,91
  • California v Carmiencke  51.Calif.7, 51.67; X,91—XIII,13
  • California v Pontius  51.Calif.8; X,135
  • California v Greene  51.Calif.9; XI,3—XII, 6; 44 Cal Rptr 438 (App Div Super Ct LA 1965), cd 382 US 993 (1965)
  • California v Wright  51.Calif.10; XI,3—XII,7
  • California v Albert, Garson  51.Calif.11; XI,62
  • California v Weger  51.Calif.12; XII,7—XIII, 13; 59 Cal Rptr 661, 251 CA2d 584 (2d Dist Div 2 1967), cd 389 US 1047 (1968)
  • California v Atkins  51.Calif.13; XIII,13—XIV,20; 439 P2d 651 (Cal Sup Ct 1968)
  • California v Davis  51.Calif.14; XIII,13—XIV,20; 67 Cal Rptr 547 (Cal Sup Ct 1968)
  • San Francisco v Simpson  51.Calif.15; XIII,13
  • California v 5 Puppeteers  51.Calif.16; XIII,13
  • California v Castro  51.Calif.18; XIV,20
  • Pain v Muni Ct of City and Co of San Francisco  51.Calif.19; XIV,20; I ACQ 25; 268 CA2d 151, 73 CR 862 (DCA 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Los Angeles v Stockton  51.Calif.20; XIV,20
  • California v Thelin  51.Calif.21; XIV,21
  • California v Bricker  51.Calif.22; XIV,21
  • California v Cohen  51.Calif.23; XIV,21; 1 CA3d 94, 81 CR 503 (DCA 1969), 399 US 904 (1970); MCLL
  • Hoffman v Muni Ct, Oakland  51.Calif.24; XIV,21; I ACQ 25
  • California v Laski  51.Calif.25; XIV,21
  • California v Macias  51.Calif.26; XIV,21; MCLL
  • California v Weinstein  51.Calif.27; XIV,21
  • California v Hill  51.Calif.28; I ACQ 22
COLORADO
  • Williams v Denver  51.Colo.1; XI,3,62; 402 P2d 615 (Colo Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Colorado v Perdew  51.Colo.2; XI,62—XII,7
CONNECTICUT
  • US v Henry  (51.Conn.a); VI,83
  • Groton v Kirby  (51.Conn.1), 51.38; VIII,70
  • Petty v Connecticut  (51.Conn.2), 51.40; VIII,123—IX,76; 190 A2d 502 (Cir Ct, App Div 1962), cd 375 US 848 (1963)
  • Turner v LaBelle  51.Conn.3; XII,7—XIV,21; 251 FSupp 443 (DC Conn 1966); MCLL
  • Hartford v Smith  51.Conn.4; XII,7—XIII,13
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • District of Columbia v Morgan  (51.DC.1), 51.9; V,46
  • District of Columbia v Am Nazi Party  (51.DC.2), 51.47; IX,3
  • District of Columbia v Reed  51.DC.3, XIII,13
  • Williams v Dist of Columbia  51.DC.4; XIII,13—XIV,21; 227 A2d 60 (DC DC 1967), rev'd and vac 419 F2d 638 (CA DC 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Mailer v US  51.DC.5; XIV,22; 420 F2d 868 (CA 4 1970), cd 397 US 1044 (1970)
FLORIDA
  • Tallahassee v Larkin  (51.Fla.a), 552.Fla.1; V,67
  • Steele v Tallahassee (Braxton, Armstrong)  (51.Fla.b), 552.Fla.2 and 3; V,67—VI,98; cd 365 US 834 (1961); ACLU
  • Robinson v Florida  (51.Fla.c), 552.Fla.4; V,99—IX,120; rev'd and rem 378 US 153 (1964); ACLU
  • Florida v Atkins  (51.Fla.1), 51.65; X,91
  • Florida v Geison  (51.Fla.2), 51.68; X,91
  • Florida v Pinkney  (51.Fla.2a), 51.68a; X,91
  • Florida v Marks  51.Fla.3; XII,7—XIII,14
  • Florida v 24 Defs  51.Fla.3a; XII,7—XIII,14
GEORGIA
  • Georgia v Agard and Rikeman  (51.Ga.a), 551.Ga.1; V,18
  • Atlanta v Jennings  (51.Ga.b), 552.Ga.2; V,67
  • Savannah v Defendants  (51.Ga.c), 552.Ga.3; V,67
  • Savannah Beach v Defendants  (51.Ga.e), 552.Ga.5; V,100
  • Georgia v Sherrod  (51.Ga.f), 51.24; VII,37
  • Georgia v Forman  (51.Ga.1), 51.34; VIII,5, 123
  • Georgia v Patch  (51.Ga.2), 51.35; VIII,5,123
  • Georgia v Rev Anderson  (51.Ga.3), 51.36; VIII,5—IX,76
  • Athens, Ga v 5 Defs  (51.Ga.4), 51.39; VIII, 123
  • Georgia v Ricks  (51.Ga.5), 51.70; X,91—XI, 4; 147 SE2d 431 (Sup Ct 1966)
  • Georgia v Craig  51.Ga.6; XI,4
  • Georgia v Cabe  51.Ga.7; XI,4
  • Georgia v Myers, Sims  51.Ga.7a; XI,4; 136 SE2d 766 (Sup Ct Ga 1964), 144 SE2d 103 (Sup Ct Ga 1965), rev'd 385 US 538 (1966), vac 153 SE2d 65 (Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 156 SE2d 65 (Sup Ct 1967), 389 US 404 (1967)
  • Atlanta v 72 Demonstrators  51.Ga.8; XII,7—XIV,22
  • Carmichael v Allen  51.Ga.8a; XII,7—XIV,22; 267 FSupp 985 (ND Ga 1966); MCLL
  • Atlanta v Ricks  51.Ga.9; XIII,14
HAWAII
  • Hawaii v Butler, Sarant  51.Haw.2; XIII,14—XIV,22; 455 P2d 4 (Hawaii Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
ILLINOIS
  • Chicago v Corney  (51.Ill.a), 51.1; III,2,22; 142 NE2d 160 (Ill App Ct 1957)
  • Terminiello v Chicago  (51.Ill.b); 337 US 1 (1949); MCLL; ACLU
  • Chicago v Defs  (51.Ill.1), 551.Ill.1; VII,29
  • Storey v Davis  (51.Ill.2), 51.8; V,46—IX,37
  • Chicago v Lameka  (51.Ill.3), 51.13; V,72
  • Illinois v Lewis  (51.Ill.4), 51.14; V,73—VI,53; 161 NE2d 821 (Ill Sup Ct 1959), aff'd 174 NE2d 197 (Ill Sup Ct 1961)
  • Matter of Romero  (51.Ill.5), 51.15; V,73—VI,53
  • Chicago v Wright, Jr  (51.Ill.6), 51.15; V,73—VI,53
  • Chicago v Eliezer  (51.Ill.7), 51.18; VI,54
  • Chicago v Clark and Carlock  (51.Ill.8), 51.20; VII,3
  • Illinois v Gregory  51.Ill.9; XII,7; 237 NE2d 720 (App Ct Ill 1968), cd 393 US 1085 (1969)
  • Chicago v 32 Persons  51.Ill.10; XII,7
  • Chicago v Lucas  51.Ill.10a; XII,7
  • Chicago v Forbes  51.Ill.11; XII,8—XIII,14
  • Chicago v Grady  51.Ill.12; XIII,14
  • Chicago v Chelmowski  51.Ill.13; XIII,14
  • Chicago v 30 Defs  51.Ill.14; XIII,14
INDIANA
  • Indiana v DeFields  51.Ind.1; XI,4; MCLL; ACLU
IOWA
  • Des Moines v 7 Defs  51.Iowa.1; XIII,14
KENTUCKY
  • Kentucky v Defs (Louisville)  (51.Ky.1), 552.Ky.1; VI,98—VIII,61
  • Kentucky v Defs (Louisville)  (52.Ky.2), 552.Ky.2; VI,127—VIII,61
LOUISIANA
  • Garner, Briscoe, Hoston v Louisiana  (51.La.a), 552.La.1; V,67—VIII,61
  • Lombard v Louisiana  (51.La.b), 552.La.2; V,100—VIII,117; 132 S2d 860 (La Sup Ct 1961), 373 US 267 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Louisiana v Rev A Jones  (51.La.c), 51.17; VI,3,54
  • Louisiana v Rev Walker and Blake  (51.La.1), 51.33; VII,103
  • Cox v Louisiana (Baton Rouge)  (51.La.2), 51.25; VII,37—X,135; 156 So2d 448 (La Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 379 US 536 (1965)
  • Louisiana v Cox (Baton Rouge)  51.La.2a, 51.25a; IX,3—X,135; 158 So2d 172 (La Sup Ct 1963), 167 So2d 352, 359 (La Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 379 US 559 (1965)
  • Cox v Louisiana  51.La.2b; X,135—XII,8; 348 F2d 750 (CA 5 1965), 10 RRLR 995 (1965), 379 US 559 (1965); MCLL
  • Louisiana v 300 Defs (New Orleans)  (51.La.3), 51.26; VII,37—VIII,93
  • Plaquemines v Farmer  (51.La.4), 51.44; IX,3—X,90
  • Louisiana v Daniel, 85 Defs (New Orleans)  (51.La.5), 51.46; IX,3—X,5
  • Brown v Louisiana  51.La.6; XI,4—XII,8; 168 So2d 104 (La Sup Ct 1964), 383 US 131 (1966)
  • Louisiana v Ora Magee  51.La.7; XII,8
  • Louisiana v Collins and 17-yr-old  51.La.8; XII,8
MARYLAND
  • Drews v Maryland (Baltimore)  (51.Md.a), 551.Md.1; V,97—X,162; 171 A2d 717 (Md Ct of App 1961), rev'd 378 US 130 (1964); vac 378 US 547 (1964); 381 US 421 (1965)
  • Maryland v Nelson and Robinson  (51.Md.b), 552.Md.2; VII,30,63
  • Maryland v Defs (Ferndale)  (51.Md.c), 552.Md.3; VII,30
  • Maryland v Wagner  (51.Md.d), 552.Md.4; VII,123—VIII,61
  • Maryland v Frankhouser  51.Md.1, 51.54; IX,38—X,135
  • Harris v Maryland  51.Md.2; X,135; 206 A2d 254 (Md Ct of App 1965)
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Massachusetts v 12 Defendants (Springfield)  51.Mass.1; X,135
MICHIGAN
  • Pyle v Michigan  (51.Mich.1), 551.Mich.2; IV,85—V,97; 103 NW2d 597 (Mich Sup Ct 1960)
  • Michigan v David, Higgins  (51.Mich.2), 51.64; X,91
MINNESOTA
  • Minnesota v Johnson  51.Minn.1; XIII,14—XIV,22
MISSISSIPPI
  • Mississippi v Dr Mason  (51.Miss.a), 551.Miss.1; V,66
  • Mississippi v Defs  (51.Miss.b), 553.Miss.1; VI,99—VIII,63
  • Mississippi v Defs (Jackson)  (51.Miss.c), 551.Miss.3; VII,29—VIII,60
  • Mississippi v Rev A Jones  (51.Miss.d), 51.22; VII,37
  • Mississippi v Barnes & Baudoin (Vicksburg)  (51.Miss.e), 552.Miss.1; VII,63
  • Mississippi v Marcia Moore  (51.Miss.f), 51.58; IX,76
  • Poole v Barnett  (51.Miss.g), 553.Miss.2; IX,121—X,128; MCLL
  • Mississippi v Block (Greenwood)  (51.Miss.1),51.37; VIII,70—X,5
  • Mississippi v Stoner (Hattiesburg)  (51.Miss.2), 51.55; IX,38—X, 6; MCLL
  • Mississippi v 42 Defs (Itta Bena)  (51.Miss.3), 51.69; X,91
  • Guyot v Pierce; Strother v Thompson (Jackson)  51.Miss.4; X,135—XIII,15; 372 F2d 654, 658 (CA 5 1967); MCLL
  • Clarksdale v Gertge  51.Miss.5; X,135; 237 FSupp 213 (ND Miss 1964)
  • Hattiesburg v Nesmith  51.Miss.6; XI,4
  • Mississippi v Schiffman  51.Miss.7; XI,4
  • McLaurin v Greenville  51.Miss.8; XII,8—XIII,15; 187 So2d 854, 861 (Miss Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 1011 (1967)
  • Mississippi v Guyot  51.Miss.9; XIII,15
  • Samuel Johnson v US  51.Miss.10; XIV,22; 394 F2d 984 (CA 5 1968), cd 394 US 952 (1969)
MISSOURI
  • Missouri v Defendants (St Louis)  (51.Mo.1), 552.Mo.1; VI,48
  • Kansas City v Bethel  51.Mo.2; XIII,15
NEBRASKA
  • Holdridge v US  (51.Neb.a), 120.19; VI,8; 282 F2d 302 (CA 8 1960)
  • Nebraska v McNair, Jones  51.Neb.1; XI,4; 135 NW2d 463 (Neb Sup Ct 1965)
NEVADA
  • Nevada v M Harvey  (51.Nev.1), 51.31; VII,103
NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • New Hampshire v Katz  (51.NH.1), 58.18; VI,105
NEW JERSEY
  • New Jersey v Congdon  (51.NJ.a), 58.17; V,104
  • New Jersey v Baer  (51.NJ.b), 51.23; VII,37
  • Newark v Gibson and Wims  (51.NJ.1), 51.51; IX,38
  • New Jersey v Stubbs  51.NJ.3; XI,4
  • Smith v New Jersey  51.NJ.4; XII,8; 218 A2d 147 (NJ Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 838 (1966)
  • Perth Amboy v 8 Puerto Ricans  51.NJ.5; XIII,15
  • New Jersey v di Suvero  51.NJ.6; XIV,22
NEW YORK
  • New York City v Weinstat  (51.NY.a), 20.20; I,34
  • New York City v Martin  (51.NY.b), 20.21; I,34
  • New York v DeHahn and Jones  (51.NY.c), 51.2; III,67—IV,3
  • New York City v Press, Margolies and Lambrecht  (51.NY.e), 51.3; IV,40
  • New York v Cartagena and Bonet  (51.NY.f), 51.16; VI,3
  • New York v Turner  (51.NY.1), 58.14b; VI,4
  • New York v Komisar  (51.NY.2), 551.NY.8; VI,126—VIII,60
  • New York v Gennaro, Peck, Sainer  (51.NY.3), 51.28; VII,70,103
  • New York v Deming, Kelley, Trickey  (51.NY.4), 51.29; VII,70
  • New York v Bell and P Gennaro  (51.NY.5), 51.32; VII,103
  • New York v 15 Defs (Rochester)  (51.NY.6), 51.41; VIII,123—X,5
  • New York v 8 Defs  (51.NY.7), 51.42; IX,3
  • New York v Blackman (NYC)  (51.NY.8), 51.43; IX,3—X,5
  • New York v Stauble (Yonkers)  (51.NY.9), 51.52; IX,38—X,6
  • New York v Callender, Galamison  51.NY.10, 51.56, (73.NY.1); IX,76—XI,4; 342 F2d 255 (CA 2 1965), cd 380 US 977 (1965)
  • New York v Prinz, Am Jewish Congress (NYC)  (51.NY.10a), 51.56a; X,6,90; MCLL
  • New York v Galamison (NYC)  (51.NY.11), 51.59; X,6; 250 NYS2d 325 (NY Sup Ct, App Term 1964)
  • New York v Martin (Malverne)  (51.NY.12), 51.61; X,6; 251 NYS2d 66 (NY Sup Ct, App Term 1963), aff'd 259 NYS2d 152 (NY Ct of App 1965), 10 RRLR 540 (1965), cd 382 US 828 (1965); MCLL
  • New York v Boutelle  (51.NY.13), 51.62; X,90
  • New York v Callender  51.NY.14, 51.63; X,90—XIII,15; 342 F2d 255 (CA 2 1965), 219 NE2d 287, 221 NE2d 181 (NY Ct of App 1966), cd 386 US 779 (1967)
  • New York v Brunson  51.NY.15; XI,4
  • New York v Ferguson  51.NY.16; XI,4—XIII,15
  • New York v Traficant  51.NY.16a; XII,8—XIII,15
  • New York v Mosquera  51.NY.17; XI,4
  • New York v Hirsch  51.NY.18; XI,4
  • New York v Rev Hayes  51.NY.19; XI,4
  • New York v Penn  51.NY.20; XI,4; 208 NE2d 789 (NY Ct of App 1965), 11 RRLR 70 (1965), 211 NE2d 529 (NY Ct of App 1965), cd 383 US 969 (1966); MCLL
  • New York v Jones  51.NY.21; XI,63; MCLL
  • New York v Forman, Lewis  51.NY.22; XI,63—XIII,15
  • In re Gray and 14 Other Demonstrators  51.NY.23; XI,63
  • US v Jones  51.NY.24; XI,63; 244 FSupp 181 (SD NY 1965), 365 F2d 675 (CA 2 1966)
  • New York v Nelson  51.NY.25; XI,63—XIII,15
  • New York v Williams  51.NY.26; XI,63
  • New York v Koppersmith  51.NY.27; XI,63—XIII,15
  • New York v Kaufman  51.NY.28; XI,63
  • New York v Rockwell  51.NY.29; XI,63
  • Baer v New York  51.NY.30; XI,63; 270 NYS2d 434 (Onondaga Co Ct 1965), cd 384 US 154 (1966)
  • New York v Scott  51.NY.31; XII,8—XIII,15
  • New York v Green  51.NY.32; XII,8—XIII,15
  • New York v Gray, Vaughan  51.NY.32a; XII,8—XIII,16
  • New York v 17 Demonstrators  51.NY.33; XII,8
  • New York v 11 Defs  51.NY.34; XII,9
  • New York v 64 Defs  51.NY.35; XIII,16
  • New York v 6 Demonstrators  (51.NY.h), 124.38; XI,73
  • New York v 38 Hippies  51.NY.36; XIII,16
  • New York v Shapiro  51.NY.37; XIII,16
  • New York v Antonetty  51.NY.38; XIII,16
  • New York v Yost  51.NY.39; XIII,16
  • Sprowal v New York  51.NY.40; XIII,16; 268 NYS2d 444 (Sup Ct), 271 NYS2d 310 (NY Ct of App 1966), cd 385 US 649 (1967)
  • New York v 21 Students  51.NY.41; XIV,22
  • New York v Archer  51.NY.42; XIV,22; MCLL
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Charlotte v Defs  (51.NC.1), 552.NC.5; V,67—VI,48
OHIO
  • Cleveland v Russell  51.Ohio.1; XIV,22
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Chester v Anderson; Pennsylvania v Anderson  51.Pa.1, 51.49; IX,38—XI,5; 347 F2d 823 (CA 3 1965), cd 384 US 1003 (1966); MCLL
  • Pennsylvania v Dortort  51.Pa.2, 51.50; IX,38—XIV,23; 208 A2d 797 (Pa Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Pennsylvania v Klos, Hechelroth, Hatton  51.Pa.3; XI,63
  • Pennsylvania v Rodd  (51.Pa.a), 124.36; XI,73
  • Philadelphia v Branche, Brower  51.Pa.4; XIII,16
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • US v Defendants  (51.SC.1); VI,8
  • South Carolina v Randolph  (51.SC.2), 552.SC.1; V,68—VII,31; 121 SE2d 349 (SC Sup Ct 1961)
  • Sumter v Defendants  (51.SC.3), 552.SC.la; VI,48
  • South Carolina v Defs (Sumter) (Muni Ct)  (51.SC.4), 552.SC.1b; VI,98
  • South Carolina v Defs (Orangeburg)  (51.SC.5), 552.SC.2a; VI,48
  • Fields v South Carolina  (51.SC.6), 552.SC.2; V,68—X,79; 126 SE2d 1 (SC Sup Ct 1962), vac and rem 372 US 522 (1963); 131 SE2d 91 (SC Sup Ct 1963), rev'd and rem 375 US 44 (1963); ACLU
  • Columbia v Defs  (51.SC.7), 552.SC.3; V,68
  • Barr, Bouie v Columbia  (51.SC.8), 552.SC.3a; VI,48—IX,121; 123 SE2d 521 (SC Sup Ct 1961), 124 SE2d 332 (SC Sup Ct 1962), rev'd 378 US 347 (1964)
  • Rock Hill v Henry  (51.SC.9), 552.SC.4; V,68—IX,121; 375 US 6 (1963); 135 SE2d 718 (SC Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 376 US 776 (1964)
  • South Carolina v Jones  (51.SC.10), 552.SC.4a; VI,76,98
  • South Carolina v Ivory  (51.SC.11), 552.SC.4b; VI,98—X,79
  • South Carolina v Ivory  (51.SC.12), 552.SC.4c; VI,99—VIII,62
  • Denmark v Defs  (51.SC.13), 552.SC.5; V,68
  • Florence v George  (51.SC.14), 552.SC.6; V,68—VIII,62
  • Spartanburg v Defs  (51.SC.15), 552.SC.7; V,100—VIII,62
  • South Carolina v 8 Defs (Greenville)  (51.SC.16), 552.SC.11; VIII,63
  • Greenville v Defendants  (51.SC.17), 551.SC.2; V,66; 122 SE2d 826 (SC Sup Ct 1961)
  • Anderson v Greenville  (51.SC.18), 551.SC.2a; V,98; 551.SC.2b; VI,45
  • South Carolina v Defendants (Greenville)  (51.SC.19), 551.SC.2a; VI,45,97
  • South Carolina v Carras, Stradley  (51.SC.20), 51.19; VI,81—VIII,5
  • South Carolina v Randolph (Sumter)  (51.SC.21), 51.27; VII,37—XII,9; 121 SE2d 349 (SC Sup Ct 1961)
TENNESSEE
  • Tennessee v Owens and Friersen  (51.Tenn.a), 551.Tenn.2; IV,64
  • Tennessee v Towles  (51.Tenn.b), 51.12; V,72
  • Nashville v Guy  (51.Tenn.c), 552.Tenn.2; V,68
  • Nashville v Anderson  (51.Tenn.d), 552.Tenn.3; V,68
  • Nashville v Olson  (51.Tenn.e), 552.Tenn.4; V,68
  • Chattanooga v Defs  (51.Tenn.f), 552.Tenn.5; V,68
  • Tennessee v Parsons  (51.Tenn.g), 552.Tenn.6; V,101—VII,31
  • Memphis v Palmer, Stikes  (51.Tenn.h), 551.Tenn.3; V,66—VI,74
  • Memphis v Defendants  (51.Tenn.i), 551.Tenn.4; V,66—VI,74
  • Tennessee v Freeman and Exum  (51.Tenn.j), 553.Tenn.1; V,101—VIII,63
  • Ford v Morris  (51.Tenn.k), 553.Tenn.2; VI,49—X,162; 355 SW2d 102, 356 SW2d 726 (Tenn Sup Ct 1962), cd 377 US 944 (1964)
  • Nashville v Defs  (51.Tenn.L), 552.Tenn.2a; VI,48
  • Nashville v Carnaham  (51.Tenn.m), 552.Tenn.4a; VI,48—VIII,63
  • Tennessee v Stewart  (51.Tenn.n), 552.Tenn.7; VI,76
  • Tennessee v Defs  (51.Tenn.o), 551.Tenn.7; VI,97
  • Tennessee v Rev McCrackin  (51.Tenn.p), 51.21; VII,37
  • Tennessee v Weinberger  (51.Tenn.pa), 51.21a; VII,70
  • Tennessee v Lewis (Nashville)  (51.Tenn.1), 552.Tenn.8; VIII,88—X,79
  • Knoxville v Defs  (51.Tenn.2), 551.Tenn.8; VII,29—VIII,60
  • Tennessee v Gustafson  (51.Tenn.3), 51.48; IX,3; MCLL
  • McKinnie v Tennessee (Nashville)  (51.Tenn.4), 51.57; IX,76—X,136; 379 SW2d 214 (Tenn Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 380 US 449 (1965)
  • Tennessee v 39 Defs (Covington)  51.Tenn.5; XI,5
  • Tennessee v Hawkins, Stevens, Allen  51.Tenn.6; XI,63
  • Tennessee v Dewart  51.Tenn.7; XIII,16
  • Tennessee v Tigner  51.Tenn.8; XIV,23
TEXAS
  • Briscoe, Tucker, Johnson, Rucker v Texas (Marshall)  (51.Tex.a), 552.Tex.2; V,68—VII,31; 341 SW2d 432,433,434 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1960)
  • San Antonio v Rev Graham, Jr  (51.Tex.b), 552.Tex.4; V,68,101
  • Houston v Green  (51.Tex.c), 552.Tex.3; V,68
  • Crossley, Rucker v Texas  (51.Tex.d), 552.Tex.2a; VI,76—VII,31; 342 SW2d 325,339 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1961)
  • Moody v Texas; Wright v Texas  (51.Tex.e), 551.Tex.4; VII,97; 356 SW2d 440,441 (Tex Ct of App 1962)
  • Gunn v University Committee to End War in Vietnam  51.Tex.1; XIV,23; 289 FSupp 469 (WD Tex 1968), dism 399 US 383 (1970)
VIRGINIA
  • Arlington v Eldridge  (51.Va.1), 552.Va.4; IV,64
  • Richmond v Defs  (51.Va.2), 552.Va.4; V,68
  • Virginia v Harris (Hopewell)  (51.Va.3), 552.Va.9; V,101—XI,53; MCLL
  • Portsmouth v Defs  (51.Va.4), 552.Va.7; V,68—VI,48
  • Wells v Gilliam  (51.Va.5), 553.Va.4; VI,49—VIII,63
  • Virginia v Allen (Hopewell)  (51.Va.6), 552.Va.9; VIII,63,88
  • US v Williams, Mathie  51.Va.7; XIII,16
WISCONSIN
  • Wisconsin v Groppi  51.Wisc.1; X,136—XI,5
  • Zwicker v Boll  51.Wisc.2; XIV,23; 270 FSupp 131 (WD Wisc), 391 US 353 (1968)
52. Against Obscenity (and 12, 14, 22, 303, 580)
ARKANSAS
  • Gent v Arkansas  (52.Ark.1), 52.91; XI,65—XIII,16; 393 SW2d 219 (Ark Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 386 US 767 (1967)
CALIFORNIA
  • Alberts v California  (52.Calif.1), 52.2; II,2—III,2; 354 US 476 (1957)
  • San Francisco v Ferlinghetti  (52.Calif.2), 52.7; III,2
  • California v Kistler  (52.Calif.3), 52.12; III,68—IV,89
  • US v Aday  (52.Calif.4), 52.14; IV,41—VIII,123; MCLL
  • Smith v California  (52.Calif.5), 52.15; IV, 41—VI,3; 361 US 147 (1959)
  • California v Steinberg  (52.Calif.6), 52.16; IV,41
  • Katzev v Los Angeles Co  (52.Calif.7), 52.19; IV,69—V,73; 341 P2d 310 (Calif Sup Ct 1959)
  • California v Aday  (52.Calif.8), 52.33; VI,4—X,136; 362 P2d 47 (Calif Sup Ct 1961), 26 CR 576 (DCA 1962); and see Aday v Super Ct of Alameda Co, 55 C2d 789 (Calif Sup Ct 1961), 13 CR 415 (Calif Sup Ct 1961), cd 379 US 931 (1964); MCLL
  • California v Shaver  (52.Calif.9), 52.42; VII,3—IX,4
  • B Smith v California  (52.Calif.10), 52.44; VII,38—IX,77; 375 US 259 (1963); ACLU
  • California v Pershina  (52.Calif.11), 52.45; VII,38
  • California v McGilvrey  (52.Calif.12), 52.49; VII,71—VIII,123
  • Whitney v San Francisco Muni Ct  (52.Calif.13), 52.53; VIII,71
  • California v Ernie Smith  (52.Calif.14), 52.63; IX,39; 26 CR 620 (DCA 1962)
  • US v Leigh  (52.Calif.15), 52.64; IX,39,77
  • US v 18 Packages of Magazines  (52.Calif.16), 52.66; IX,39—X,91; 227 FSupp 198 (ND Cal 1963), 238 FSupp 846 (ND Cal 1964)
  • California v Elder, Stafford  (52.Calif.17), 52.68; IX,77
  • California v Elder  (52.Calif.18), 52.75; X,8; MCLL
  • California v Thompson  52.Calif.19, 52.78; X,92—XII,9; MCLL
  • California v Di Tullio  (52.Calif.20), 52.84; XI,64
  • Chance v California  (52.Calif.21), 52.85; XI,64—XIII,16; 389 US 89 (1967)
  • California v Demm  52.Calif.22; XII,9
  • California v Dixon  52.Calif.23; XII,9
  • California v Cory  52.Calif.24; XII,9
  • San Francisco v Maginnis  52.Calif.25; XII,9
  • Daly v California  52.Calif.26; XIV,23; cd 89 SCt 1180 (1968)
COLORADO
  • Colorado v Mime Troupe  52.Colo.1; XII,9
CONNECTICUT
  • Darnell, III, v US  (52.Conn.a); MCLL
  • Connecticut v Huntington  (52.Conn.1), 52.48; VII,71—X,136; 204 A2d 411 (Conn Sup Ct of Errors 1964)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Stone v District of Columbia  52.DC.1, 52.82; X,136—XII,9; 350 F2d 729 (CA DC 1965), aff'd 359 F2d 275 (CA DC 1966)
FLORIDA
  • Marcel Fort v Miami  52.Fla.1, 52.97; XII,9—XIII,17; 195 So2d 53 (Fla DCA 1967), cd 389 US 918 (1967)
GEORGIA
  • Lopert Pictures Corp v Atlanta Bd of Censors  (52.Ga.1), 52.39; VI,104; MCLL
  • Corinth Publications v Wesberry  (52.Ga.a), 52.96; XIII,17; 146 SE2d 764 (Ga Sup Ct 1966), rev'd 388 US 448 (1967)
  • Stanley v Georgia (Fulton Co)  52.Ga.2; XIV,23; 394 US 557 (1969)
ILLINOIS
  • Chicago v Russell  (52.Ill.1), 52.55; VIII,93—X,7
  • Illinois v Bruce  (52.Ill.2), 52.57; VIII,94—XI,5; rev'd 202 NE2d 497 (Ill Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Chicago v Kroch's and Brentano's  (52.Ill.3), 52.60; IX,4,38
  • Illinois v Sikora  (52.Ill.4), 52.79; X,92,136; 204 NE2d 768 (Ill Sup Ct 1965)
INDIANA
  • Indiana v Kuebel  (52.Ind.1), 52.43; VII,4,37; 172 NE2d 45 (Ind Sup Ct 1961); MCLL
KANSAS
  • A Quantity of Books v Kansas  (52.Kan.1), 52.57; X,8; 379 P2d 254 (Kan Sup Ct 1962), 378 US 205 (1964); MCLL
KENTUCKY
  • Austin v Kentucky  52.Ky.1, 52.86; XI,64—XIII,16; 386 SW2d 270 (Ky Ct of App 1965), 384 US 916 (1966), rev'd 386 US 767 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
MARYLAND
  • Monfred v Maryland  (52.Md.a); 173 A2d 173 (Md Sup Ct 1961), cd 368 US 953 (1962); MCLL
  • Siegel Enterprises v Hepbron  (52.Md.1), 52.29; V,73—VI,54; 162 A2d 727 (Md Ct of App 1960), cd 364 US 909 (1960)
  • Yudkin v Maryland  (52.Md.2), 52.46; VII,38—VIII,93; 182 A2d 798 (Md Ct of App 1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Freedman v Maryland  (52.Md.3), 52.76; X,8,92,136; 380 US 51 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Maryland v Freedman  (52.Md.3a), 52.76a; X,133—XI,5
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Massachusetts v Spiegel  (52.Mass.1), 52.22; V,47—IX,4
  • Massachusetts v Interstate News Dealers Supply  (52.Mass.2), 52.40; VII,3—IX,38; 191 NE2d 873 (Mass Sup Jud Ct 1963); MCLL
  • Interstate News Dealers Supply Co v Boston Police Commr  (52.Mass.3), 52.41; VII,3
  • A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v Atty Genl of Massachusetts  52.Mass.4, 52.83; XI,5—XII,10; 206 NE2d 403 (Mass Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 383 US 413 (1966); ACLU
MICHIGAN
  • Michigan v Villano  (52.Mich.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Butler v Michigan  (52.Mich.1), 52.1; II,2,50; 352 US 380 (1957); ACLU
  • US v Frew and Steiner  (52.Mich.2), 52.20; V,22—IX,4; 187 FSupp 500 (ED Mich 1960); and see Steiner and Frew v Hocke and Ware, 272 F2d 384 (CA 9 1959); MCLL
  • US v Steiner  (52.Mich.3), 52.21; V,23—VI,3
  • Re Franklyn C Olson  (52.Mich.4), 52.23; V,73—VI,54
  • Michigan v Dakota  (52.Mich.6), 52.67; IX,39; MCLL
  • US v West Coast News, Maxey, Aday  52.Mich.7, 52.95; XII,10—XIII,17; I ACQ 33; 216 FSupp 911 (WD Mich 1963), 318 F2d 588 (CA 6 1963); 228 FSupp 171 (1964), aff'd 357 F2d 855 (CA 6 1966), rev'd 388 US 447 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
MINNESOTA
  • Minnesota v Brodigan  (52.Minn.1), 52.87; XI,64; MCLL
MISSOURI
  • St Louis v Molasky  (52.Mo.1), 52.4; II,50
  • Marcus v Search Warrant  (52.Mo.2), 52.30; VI,4—VII,3; 367 US 717 (1961); MCLL
NEBRASKA
  • Nebraska v Nelson d/b/a Nelson News Co  (52.Neb.1), 52.9; III,67—IV,3
  • Nebraska v Coren d/b/a Meyers News  (52.Neb.2), 52.10; III,68—V,2; 95 NW2d 678 (Neb Sup Ct 1959)
  • Nebraska v Odorisio d/b/a General Pub Co  (52.Neb.3), 52.11; III,68—IV,3
NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • US v Humor Magazine, Excellent Publications, Deerfield Publ Co, Wilmot Enterprises  (52.NH.1), 52.47; VII,38—VIII,71
NEW JERSEY
  • Adams Newark Theater Co v Newark  (52.NJ.1), 52.6; II,66—III,2; 126 A2d 340 (NJ Sup Ct 1956), aff'd 354 US 931 (1957)
  • New Jersey v Hudson Co News Company  (52.NJ.2), 52.77; X,8; 196 A2d 225 (1963)
NEW YORK
  • Padell v US  (52.NY.a); 262 F2d 357 (CA 2 1959), cd 359 US 942 (1959); MCLL
  • Roth v US  (52.NY.1), 52.3; II,50—III,67; 354 US 476 (1957); MCLL
  • Kingsley Books v Brown  (52.NY.2), 52.5; II,66—III,2; 354 US 436 (1957); MCLL
  • New York v Shapiro  (52.NY.3), 52.8; III,2—IV,3
  • New York v Bantam Books  (52.NY.4), 52.13; III,68
  • New York v Richmond News Co  (52.NY.5), 52.24, 52.38; V,73—VI,103; 175 NE2d 681 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • Buffalo v May  (52.NY.6), 52.26; V,73—VI,4
  • New York v Guenther  (52.NY.7), 52.27; V,73—VI,4
  • Gregory v Ball and Lefkowitz  (52.NY.8), 52.28; V,73—VI,103
  • Mishkin v New York  52.NY.9, 52.34; VI,54—XII,10; 207 NYS2d 390 (NY Ct of Spec Sess 1960), 204 NE2d 209 (NY Ct of App 1964), 205 NE2d 201 (NY Ct of App 1965), aff'd 383 US 502 (1966); MCLL
  • Larkin v G I Distributors  (52.NY.10), 52.35; VI,54—VIII,123; 211 NYS2d 733 (1960), aff'd 215 NYS2d 362 (1961), 175 NE2d 681 (NY Ct of App 1961), aff'd 241 NYS2d 159 (NY Sup Ct 1963); MCLL
  • G I Distributors v Murphy  (52.NY.11), 52.35a; VIII,123—X,7
  • New York v Finkelstein  (52.NY.12), 52.36; VI,81; 214 NYS2d 363 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • New York v O'Neill  (52.NY.14), 52.50; VII,71,103; 182 NE2d 95 (NY Ct of App 1962); MCLL
  • New York v 3 Booksellers  (52.NY.15), 52.58; VIII,123
  • New York v Pocket Books and Hamilton News Co  (52.NY.16), 52.59; IX,4
  • New York v The Bookcase  (52.NY.17), 52.62; IX,4—X,7; 252 NYS2d 433 (NY Ct of App 1964); MCLL
  • New York v Mekas  (52.NY.18), 52.69; IX,77—X,136
  • New York v Bruce  (52.NY.19), 52.70; IX,77—XI,5
  • New York v Waldman  (52.NY.20), 52.73; X,8; MCLL
  • New York v Diamond  (52.NY.21), 52.74; X,8; MCLL
  • New York v Appelbaum  (52.NY.22), 52.80; X,136; MCLL
  • New York v Nuchims  (52.NY.23), 52.81; X,136—XI,64
  • US v "491"  (52.NY.24), 52.88; XI,64
  • Redrup v New York  52.NY.25, 52.92; XI,65—XIII,16; rev'd 386 US 767 (1967)
  • New York v Sanders  52.NY.26; XII,10; rev'd 386 US 767 (1967)
  • Tannenbaum v New York  (52.NY.b); MCLL
  • Rabeck v New York  52.NY.27; XIV,23; rev'd 391 US 462 (1968)
OHIO
  • Ohio v O Lerner  (52.Ohio.a); MCLL
  • Jacobellis v Ohio  (52.Ohio.2), 52.71; IX,77; 378 US 184 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
OREGON
  • Oregon v Childs  52.Ore.1; XIV,23; 447 P2d 304 (Ore Sup Ct 1968), cd 394 US 931 (1969)
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Pennsylvania v Blumenstein  (52.Pa.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Ginzburg v US  52.Pa.1, 52.56; VIII,93—XII,10; aff'd 383 US 463 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Sidelko  (52.Pa.2), 52.89; XI,64; 248 FSupp 813 (MD Pa 1965)
RHODE ISLAND
  • Bantam Books v Sullivan  (52.RI.1), 52.31; VI,4—IX,38; 176 A2d 393 (RI Sup Ct 1961), prob juris noted 370 US 933 (1962); 372 US 58 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Yekhtikian v Blessing  (52.RI.2), 52.17; IV,41; 157 A2d 669 (RI Sup Ct 1960)
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • South Carolina v Ravenell  (52.SC.1), 52.54; VIII,93,123
  • US v Walker  (52.SC.2), 52.65; IX,39—X,91
VIRGINIA
  • Goldstein v Virginia  (52.Va.1), 52.18; IV,41; 104 SE2d 66 (Va Sup Ct 1958)
  • Virginia v Kuch  (52.Va.2), 52.90; XI,64
  • Rosenbloom v Virginia  (52.Va.3), 52.94; XIII,17; 388 US 450 (1967); MCLL
  • Central Magazine Sales v US  (52.Va.4), 52.98; XIII,17; 373 F2d 633 (CA 4 1967), rev'd 389 US 50 (1967)
WASHINGTON
  • Washington ex rel Lally v Gump, Justice of Peace  (52.Wash.1), 52.32; VI,4,54
  • Seattle v Johnson  (52.Wash.2), 52.52; VIII,6; MCLL
  • Washington v Vander Schoor  52.Wash.3; XII,10
  • Washington v Dewitt  52.Wash.4; XII,10
WISCONSIN
  • McCauley v "Tropic of Cancer"  (52.Wisc.1), 52.51; VIII,6,93; 121 NW2d 545 (Wisc Sup Ct 1963)
53. Against Defamation (and 61)
  • New York v Brooklyn Weekly and Brooklyn Daily  (53.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Sachs v Government of the Canal Zone  (53.b); 176 F2d 292 (CA 5 1949), cd 338 US 858 (1949); MCLL
  • Beauharnais v Illinois  (53.c); 343 US 250 (1952); MCLL; ACLU
  • Alabama v Salisbury  53.1; VI,4,54
  • California v Michaels  53.2; VI,81—VII,4
  • Holden v Pioneer Broadcasting Co  53.3; VII,38,71; 365 P2d 845 (Ore Sup Ct 1961)
  • Louisiana v Moore  53.4; VIII,6—X,92
  • Louisiana v Cox  53.5; VIII,94—XI,5; 167 So2d 352, 359 (La Sup Ct 1964), cd 380 US 972 (1964)
  • Garrison v Louisiana  53.6; IX,77—X,136; 379 US 64 (1964)
  • Chicago v Lambert  53.7; X,8—XI,5; 197 NE2d 448 (Ill Ct of App 1964)
  • Kentucky v Ashton  53.8; X,8—XIII,17; 405 SW2d 562 (CA Ken 1965), rev'd 384 US 195 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Capell  53.9; X,136
  • In re Roberts  53.10; XI,65
  • Illinois v Thomas  53.11; XIII,17
54. Against Sedition, Anarchy, Syndicalism, Riot (and 63, 241-244, 429)
  • Herndon v Lowry, Sheriff  (54.a); 301 US 242 (1937); MCLL
  • Colorado v Moyer, Haywood, Pettibone  (54.b); MCLL
  • US v Roumanian-American Publishing Co  (54.c), 57.5; II,33—III,47
  • US v Powell  54.1; I,88—VII,4; MCLL
  • Louisiana v Goldfinch  54.2; VI,47—XI,5; 132 So2d 860 (La Sup Ct 1961)
  • Louisiana v Diamond  54.3; VII,38—IX,39; dism'd writ as improv granted 376 US 201 (1964)
  • Louisiana v Zellner, McDew  54.4; VII,38—X,136; MCLL
  • Georgia v Perdew  54.6; VIII,124—X,9; 137 SE2d 711 (Ga Ct of App 1964); MCLL
  • Georgia v Aelony  54.7; VIII,124—X,9
  • Aelony v Pace (Americus, Sumter Co)  54.7a; IX,4—X,9
  • Georgia v Wells, Harris  54.7b; X,9—XI,5
  • Wells v Reynolds  54.7c; X,9—XII,10; 238 FSupp 779 (MD Ga 1965), aff'd 382 US 39 (1965)
  • Louisiana v Bell  54.8; IX,39—X,9
  • New York v Epton  54.9; X,9—XIV,24; 252 NYS2d 388, 276 NYS2d 847; 248 FSupp 276; 281 NYS2d 9, cd 390 US 29 (1967); MCLL
  • New York v Epton, Lynn  54.9a; X,10,92
  • New York City v Rosen  54.9b; X,92
  • Pennsylvania v Hayes  54.10; X,92—XII,10; 209 A2d 38 (Pa Sup Ct 1965)
  • Mississippi v Lewis  54.11; X,92; MCLL
  • US v Bowe, Collier, Sayyed  54.12; X,136—XIII,17; 360 F2d 1 (CA 2 1966), cd 385 US 961 (1966)
  • New York v Weinstein  54.13; XI,65
  • California v John Harris  54.14; XII,10—XIV,24
  • Younger v Harris  54.14a; XII,10—XIV,24; I ACQ 22; 281 FSupp 507 (CD Cal 1968), 393 US 1013 (1969), 394 US 913 (1969), 395 US 955 (1969)
  • Georgia v Wilson, Simmons  54.15; XIII,18
  • Selma v Carmichael  54.16; XIII,18,35; 12 RRLR 349 (SD Ala 1966)
  • Carmichael, Dallas Co Independent Free Voter Organization v Selma, Judges, City Prosecutor  54.16a; XIII,18
  • Prattville, Ala v Carmichael  54.17; XIII,18
  • Kentucky v McSurely, Braden  54.19; XIII,18—XIV,24; 282 FSupp 848 (ED Ken 1967), 398 F2d 817 (CA 6 1968), dism'd 390 US 412 (1968)
  • Brown v Clark  54.20; XIII,18—XIV,24; 274 FSupp 95 (ED La 1967)
  • US v Brown  54.20a; XIV,24; 281 FSupp 31 (ED La 1968); MCLL
  • Maryland v Brown  54.21; XIII,18—XIV,24
  • Ware v Nichols  54.22; XIII,18; 266 FSupp 564 (MD Miss 1967)
  • New York v Stanford  54.23; XIII,18
  • Ohio v Brown  54.24; XIII,19
  • Tennessee v George Ware  54.25; XIII,19
  • Tennessee v Ware, Stephens  54.26; XIII,19
  • SNCC v Tennessee  54.26a; XIII,19—XIV,25
  • Texas v Franklin  54.27; XIII,19
  • Brooks v Briley (Nashville)  54.28; XIII,19—XIV,25; 274 FSupp 538 (MD Tenn 1967), aff'd 391 US 361 (1968); MCLL
  • Samuels v Mackell  54.29; XIV,25; 288 FSupp 348 (SD NY 1968), aff'd 91 SCt 764 (1971)
  • Lynch v Maryland  54.31; XIV,25; 236 A2d 45 (Md Ct Spec Appls 1967), cd 393 US 915 (1968)
  • US v Dellinger  54.32; XIV,25; I ACQ 29, 35; MCLL; ACLU
  • St Louis v Hutchins  54.33; XIV,26; 395 US 444 (1969)
  • Brandenburg v Ohio  54.34; XIV,26; rev'd 395 US 444 (1969)
  • Straut v Calissi  54.35; XIV,26; 293 FSupp 1339 (DC NJ 1968)
  • Landry v Boyle  54.36; XIV,26; 280 FSupp 929 (ND Ill 1967), 280 FSupp 938, 968 (ND Ill 1968), 288 FSupp 183, 189, 194, 200 (ND Ill 1968), dism'd 393 US 220 (1968)
55. Against Picketing, Leafleting, Demonstrating (and 51, 123, 541, 542, 551, 552)
ALABAMA
  • Shuttlesworth v Alabama (Birmingham)  55.Ala.1, 55.16; VII,72—XII,11; 155 So2d 605 (Ala Ct of App 1962), cd 155 So2d 606 (Ala Sup Ct 1963); 161 So2d 796 (Ala Ct of App 1964), cd 161 So2d 799 (Ala Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 382 US 87 (1965); 181 So2d 628 (Ala Ct of App 1965), 399 F2d 529 (CA 5 1968)
  • Alabama v McNair (Talladega)  (55.Ala.2), 55.18; VII,72—X,10; 178 So2d 98 (Ala Ct of App 1965), 185 So2d 125 (Ala Sup Ct 1965)
  • Alabama v Banks, Allen  55.Ala.2a, 55.18a; X,93—XI,65; 178 So2d 98 (Ala Ct of App 1965), 10 RRLR 1491 (1965)
  • Alabama v Ten Defs (Selma)  (55.Ala.3), 55.72; IX,5—X,93
  • Birmingham v 2,500 Defs  (55.Ala.4), 55.77; IX,6—X,12
  • Birmingham v Croskey  (55.Ala.4a), 55.77a; IX,6
  • Shelton v Birmingham  (55.Ala.4b), 55.77b; X,12,93; 165 So2d 912 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • Shuttlesworth v Birmingham  55.Ala.4c, 55.77c; X,12—XIV,26; 178 So2d 178 (Ala Ct of App 1965), 10 RRLR 1479 (1965), 180 So2d 114 (Ala Ct of App 1965), 206 So2d 348 (Sup Ct of Ala 1967), rev'd 394 US 147 (1968); 222 So2d 377 (Ala Ct of App 1969)
  • Fowlkes v Birmingham  55.Ala.4d, 55.77d X,12—XI,6; 178 So2d 180 (Ala Ct of App 1965), 10 RRLR 1481 (1965)
  • Smith v Birmingham  (55.Ala.4e), 55.77c; X,12,93; 168 So2d 35 (Ala Ct of App 1964), 9 RRLR 1713 (1964)
  • Carter v Birmingham  55.Ala.4f, 55.77f; X,12,93,137; cd 171 So2d 100,107 (Ala Sup Ct 1965), 10 RRLR 91 (1965)
  • Clemons, Thomas v Birmingham  55.Ala.4g, 55.77g; X,12,137; cd 171 So2d 85,456 (Ala Sup Ct 1965), 10 RRLR 98 (1965)
  • Cruikshank v Birmingham  (55.Ala.4h), 55.77h; X,12,94; 178 So2d 230 (Ala Ct of App 1965)
  • Birmingham v H Middlebrooks, Lee  (55.Ala.4i), 55.77i; X,94
  • Birmingham v L Middlebrooks  55.Ala.4j, 55.77j; X,94,137; 170 So2d 427 (Ala Sup Ct 1965), 10 RRLR 91 (1965)
  • Birmingham v Primm  (55.Ala.5), 55.79; IX,79; 9 RRLR 88 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • Alabama v Chace (Tuscaloosa)  (55.Ala.6), 55.80; IX,79—X,12
  • Alabama v Boynton  (55.Ala.7), 55.101; X,95; 10 RRLR 209 (SD Ala 1965)
  • Forman v Montgomery  55.Ala.8; XI,6—XIII,19; 245 FSupp 17 (MD Ala 1965), 355 F2d 930 (CA 5 1966), cd 384 US 1009 (1966); MCLL
  • Alabama v Rev Days  55.Ala.9; XI,6
  • Jefferson Co Bd of Educ v SCLC  55.Ala.10; XI,65—XIV,26
  • Bd of Educ of Jefferson Co v SCLC  55.Ala. 10a; XII,11
  • Smith v Montgomery  55.Ala.11; XII,11; 11 RRLR 105 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Selma Bus Lines v King  55.Ala.12; XII,11—XIII,20
  • Alabama v Hester, Lombard  55.Ala.13; XIII,20
  • Alabama v Boone, Rudolph, Hunter  55.Ala.14; XIII,20
  • Mobile Co Bd of School Commrs v Birdie Mae Davis  55.Ala.17; XIV,27; 318 F2d 63 (CA 5), 322 F2d 356, cd 375 US 894 (1963); MCLL
ARIZONA
  • Arizona v Horn, Morgan  55.Ariz.1; XI,6—XIII,20; MCLL
CALIFORNIA
  • San Francisco v Paul  (55.Calif.1), 57.7; III,23
  • California v Wheeler  (55.Calif.2), 55.10; VII,4
  • California v Turner, Kuehn  (55.Calif.3), 55.17; VII,72
  • California v Peterson  (55.Calif.4), 55.21; VII,103—VIII,125; cd 375 US 935 (1963)
  • California v Brown, Poland, Cook  (55.Calif.5), 55.33; VIII,94
  • Montgomery Ward v CORE  (55.Calif.6), 55.34; VIII,125; MCLL
  • Barnes v CORE (Butte Co)  (55.Calif.6a), 55.34a; VIII,125—X,10; MCLL
  • California v Stern, Goines  55.Calif.7, 55.91; X,94,137
  • In re Petition of US  55.Calif.8, 55,92; X,94—XI,6; 10 RRLR 1001 (SD Calif 1965)
  • US v Anderson  55.Calif.8a; XI,6
  • California v 10 Ministers  55.Calif.9; XI,6
  • California v Rubin, Gullahorn, Weissman  55.Calif.10; XI,6,65
  • California v Andrae  55.Calif.11; XI,6
  • California v 5 Demonstrators  55.Calif.12; XI,6—XIII,20
  • California v Gould  55.Calif.13; XI,6—XIII,20; MCLL
  • California v Plagowski  (55.Calif.13a), 126.2; XI,19—XII,25
  • California v Tiernan, Petrie  (55.Calif.13b), 126.6; XI,74
  • California v Amey, Sanders, Smith  55.Calif.14; XI,65—XIII,20
  • California v Zion, Miller, Kauffman  55.Calif.15; XI,65
  • California v Havens  55.Calif.16; XI,66—XIII,20; MCLL
  • California v Bennett, Leggett, Oakland Writer  55.Calif.17; XI,66—XII,11
  • Berkeley v Poland  55.Calif.18; XII,11—XIII,20
  • In re Berry  55.Calif.19; XIII,20—XIV,27; 57 Cal Rptr 645 (Ct of App 3rd Dist 1967), 65 Cal Rptr 273 (Cal Sup Ct 1968), vac 436 P2d 273 (Cal Sup Ct 1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Oakland v Stephens  55.Calif.22; XIII,20
  • United Farmworkers Organizing Comm v Superior Ct, Kern Co; Giumarra Bros Fruit Co  55.Calif.23; XIII,20—XIV,27; 62 CR 567 (Ct of App 1967); MCLL
  • California v Nelson, Seligman  55.Calif.24; XIV,27
  • In re Hoffman, Carson  55.Calif.25; XIV,27; 434 P2d 353 (Cal Sup Ct 1967)
  • California v Lamm, Rosenberg  55.Calif.26; XIV,27
  • California v Kepler  55.Calif.27; XIV,27
  • California v Wallace  55.Calif.29; XIV,27
  • Connor v California  55.Calif.30; XIV,27; cd 393 US 838 (1968)
  • California v Ridenour  55.Calif.31; XIV,27
  • Berkeley Peoples' Park  55.Calif.32; XIV,28; MCLL
  • California v Yank, Lustig  55.Calif.32a; XIV,28; MCLL; ACLU
  • Halvonik v Reagan  55.Calif.32b; XIV,29; I ACQ 34; MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Glass, Barkley; Barkley v Pitchess  55.Calif.33; XIV,29; MCLL
COLORADO
  • Perdew, Phillips, Deluxe v Denver  55.Colo.1; XIII,21—XIV,29; 432 P2d 239 (Colo Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
CONNECTICUT
  • United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, CIO v Baldwin, Governor  (55.Conn.a); 67 FSupp 235 (DC Conn 1946); MCLL
  • Connecticut v Jackson, Moss  (55.Conn.1), 55.15; VII,72
  • US v Aarons and Swann  (55.Conn.2), 120.20, 123.22; VII,106—VIII,96; 310 F2d 341 (CA 2 1962)
  • US v Richman  (55.Conn.2a), 120.20a; VI,83,106
  • US v Henry  (55.Conn.2b), 120.23; VI,83
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • US v Dellinger  (55.DC.1), 55.11; VII,4
  • District of Columbia v Gilmore  (55.DC.2), 55.13; VII,38
  • District of Columbia v Moodnik  (55.DC.3), 55.14; VII,39
  • Scott v District of Columbia  (55.DC.4), 55.24; VII,104—VIII,125; 184 A2d 849 (DC Muni Ct of App 1962), cd 374 US 844 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v 7 Defs  55.DC.5; X,137—XIII,21; MCLL
  • Jalbert v Dist of Columbia  55.DC.6; XI,6—XIII,21; 387 F2d 233 (CA DC 1967); MCLL
  • In re Demonstrators  55.DC.7; XI,66
  • NLRB v Teamsters Local 639  (55.DC.a), 55.5; V,47; 362 US 274 (1960)
FLORIDA
  • Fort Lauderdale v Barber and Fulton  (55.Fla.a), 551.Fla.6; VII,29.61
  • B & B Cash Grocery v Young Adults for Progressive Action  (55.Fla.b), 55.8; VII,4,103
  • Young v Davis  (55.Fla.1), 55.86; IX,79; 9 RRLR 590 (MD Fla 1964); MCLL
  • Dawson v Florida  55.Fla.2, 55.89; X,13—Xi,66; 9 RRLR 831 (CA 5 1964), 11 RRLR 337 (MD Fla 1965)
  • Florida v Davidson (St Augustine)  (55.Fla.2a), 55.89a; X,14
  • St Augustine v Neely  55.Fla.2aa; X,137; 170 So2d 291 (Fla Sup Ct 1964)
  • Florida v 88 Defs (St Augustine)  (55.Fla.2b), 55.89b; X,14
  • Young v Davis  55.Fla.2c, 55.89c; X,14—XI,7; 8 RRLR 590 (MD Fla 1964)
GEORGIA
  • Staub v Baxley  (55.Ga.1), 57.9; III,23; 355 US 313 (1958); ACLU
  • Wright v Georgia  (55.Ga.a), 551.Ga.4; VI,97—VIII,116; 122 SE2d 737 (Ga Sup Ct 1961), rev'd 373 US 284 (1963)
  • Georgia v Forman  (55.Ga.2), 59.24; VII,72
  • Georgia v Rev Green  (55.Ga.3), 55.20; VII,103—VIII,71
  • Albany v Daniels, Davis, deLissovoy, Mormon  (55.Ga.4), 55.37; VIII,125—X,93; MCLL
  • Georgia v deLissovoy  (55.Ga.4a), 55.37a; IX,78
  • Albany v Wheeler  (55.Ga.5), 55.38; VIII,125
  • Albany v Bell  (55.Ga.6), 55.39; VIII,125
  • Albany v Starling  (55.Ga.7), 55.40; VIII,125
  • Albany v Mosley, Washington  (55.Ga.8), 55.41; VIII,125
  • Albany v Brown  (55.Ga.9), 55.42; VIII,125
  • Albany v Randolph, McCray, McCarthy  (55.Ga.10), 55.43; VIII,125
  • Albany v Ricks  (55.Ga.11), 55.44; VIII,125
  • Georgia v Ricks  (55.Ga.12), 55.45; VIII,125
  • Albany v King and Webb  (55.Ga.13), 55.46; VIII,125
  • Albany v Quartimon  (55.Ga.14), 55.47; VIII,125
  • Albany v Rothstein  (55.Ga.15), 55.48; VIII,125
  • Albany v Giddens, Cover, Allen  (55.Ga.16), 55.49; VIII,125
  • Albany v Mann, Cade Wender, Cohen, Stech, Rabinowitz, Blechner  (55.Ga.17), 55.50; VIII,125
  • Albany v Porter  (55.Ga.18), 55.51; VIII,126
  • Albany v Washington  (55.Ga.19), 55.52; VIII,126
  • Albany v Perdew  (55.Ga.20), 55.53; VIII,126
  • Georgia v Perdew, Harris, Allen  (55.Ga.21), 55.54; VIII,126—IX,5
  • Georgia v Durham and McDaniel  (55.Ga.22), 55.55; VIII,126—IX,5
  • Americus v Wiggins, Merrit, Brown  (55.Ga.23), 55.56; VIII,126
  • Americus v Goober  (55.Ga.24), 55.57; VIII,126
  • Americus v Newsome  (55.Ga.25), 55.58; VIII,126
  • Americus v Wilbur and Moran  (55.Ga.26), 55.59; VIII,126
  • Americus v Daniels  (55.Ga.27), 55.60; VIII,126
  • Americus v Stephens  (55.Ga.28), 55.61; VIII,126
  • Americus v 20 Defendants  (55.Ga.29), 55.62; VIII,126
  • Americus v 48 Defendants  (55.Ga.30), 55.63; VIII,126
  • Americus v 35 Defendants  (55.Ga.31), 55.64; VIII,126
  • Georgia v Mary Moss  (55.Ga.32), 55.65; VIII,126
  • Mayor's Court of Fitzgerald v Mary Moss  (55.Ga.33), 55.66; VIII,126—IX,5; 366 F2d 34 (CA 5 1965)
  • US v Anderson (Albany, Ga)  (55.Ga.34), 55.67; VIII,126—X,93; MCLL
  • US v Rabinowitz (Macon, Ga)  (55.Ga.35), 55.68; VIII,126—XII,ll; 366 F2d 34 (CA 5 1966); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Georgia v Tuttle, Jr  (55.Ga.36), 55.73; IX,5; 377 US 987 (1964), 9 RRLR 838 (1964)
  • Georgia v Havice  (55.Ga.37), 55.74; IX,5; MCLL
  • Georgia v 24 CNVA Members  (55.Ga.38), 55.78; IX,40
  • Kunney v Holt  55.Ga.39; XI,7—XIII,21
  • Americus v 23 Demonstrators  55.Ga.40; XI,7—XIII,21
  • Barnum v Chambliss (Americus)  55.Ga.41; XI,7—XIII,21; 247 FSupp 794 (MD Ga 1965)
  • Americus v Lewis  55.Ga.42; XI,7—XIII,21
  • Americus v 5 Sound Truck Riders  55.Ga.43; XI,7—XIII,21
  • Americus v 32 Demonstrators  55.Ga.43a; XI,7; MCLL
ILLINOIS
  • Streamwood Builders v Brolin  (55.Ill.l), 55.3; V,23—VI,5; 165 NE2d 531 (Ill App Ct 1960)
  • Illinois v Tranquilli (Cairo)  (55.Ill.2), 55.28; VIII,8—X,93
  • Illinois v Peake  (55.Ill.3), 55.29; VIII,8,125
  • NAACP v Cairo  (55.Ill.3a), 55.29a; VIII,124
  • Chicago v Barney, Gregory  (55.Ill.4), 55.76; IX,5,40
  • Illinois v Defs (Chicago)  (55.Ill.5), 55.96; X,94
  • Gregory v Chicago  55.Ill.6; XII,ll—XIV,29; 233 NE2d 422 (Ill Sup Ct), rev'd 394 US lll (1969)
  • Jewish War Veterans v Nazi Party (Chicago)  55.Ill.7; XII,ll—XIII,21; 260 FSupp 452 (ND E Div 1966)
  • Chicago v Hennershot  55.Ill.8; XII,ll—XIII,21; MCLL; ACLU
  • Lyons v Chicago Park District  55.Ill.9; XIII,21—XIV,29; 237 NE2d 519 (Ill Sup Ct 1966), 393 US 939 (1968)
INDIANA
  • Indiana v Coleman  (55.Ind.l), 5.4a; VII,4,38; 176 NE2d 205 (Ind Sup Ct 1961)
  • United Electrical, Radio, & Machine Workers of America, CIO v Gates, Governor  (55.Ind.a); MCLL
KANSAS
  • US v 39 Defs  (55.Kan.l), 55.75; IX,5
KENTUCKY
  • Re Pfc Robert Greenberg  (55.Ky.l), 55.14a; VII,72
LOUISIANA
  • Louisiana v Rockwell  (55.La.l), 58.21; VII,5,103
  • Moore v Louisiana  (55.La.2) , 55.19; VII, 103—IX, 39; 156 So2d 606 (La Sup Ct 1963) , cd 376 US 912 (1964)
  • Louisiana v Lawrence  55.La.3; XI, 7; MCLL
  • Bogalusa v Britt  55.La.4; XI, 7
  • Louisiana v Austin  55.La.5; XI, 7—XII, 11
  • Louisiana v Austin  55.La.5a; XI, 7—XII, 11
  • Louisiana v Barnes  55.La.6; XI, 7
  • Bogalusa v Edwards  55.La.7; XI, 8
  • Louisiana v Hamilton  55.La.8; XI, 8
  • Louisiana v Davis, Whyte, Williams  55.La.9; XI, 66
  • Davis v Francois  55.La.10; XIV, 29; 278 FSupp 466 (DC La 1968) , 395 F2d 730 (CA 5 1968)
MARYLAND
  • Maryland v Lynch  55.Md.1; XI, 66
  • Maryland v 6 Students  55.Md.2; XII, 11
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Boston v Benson  55.Mass.1; XI, 66
  • Massachusetts v Belton, Belton, Lavelle, Somers  55.Mass.2; XI, 66—XIII, 22
  • Boston v Matthei  55.Mass.3; XIII, 22
MICHIGAN
  • Michigan v 14 Students  (55.Mich.1) , 55.6; V, 47
  • Michigan v Chester  (55.Mich.3) , 55.87; X, 13
  • Michigan v Barnard  (55.Mich.4) , 55.99; X, 95, 137
MISSISSIPPI
  • Mississippi v Pestana  (55.Miss.a) ; MCLL
  • Jackson v Allen (Hinds Co)  (55.Miss.1) , 55.25; VII, 104—X, 10
  • Crawford v Mississippi  (55.Miss.2) , 55.32; VIII, 71—X, 10; MCLL
  • Calhoun v Meridian  55.Miss.3; IX, 79—XIII, 36; 355 F2d 209 (CA 5 1966) , 11 RRLR 343 (1966)
  • Brown v Meridian  55.Miss.3a, 55.81a; X, 12—XIII, 36; 356 F2d 602 (CA 5 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Columbus, Mississippi v Galloway and Mays  (55.Miss.4) , 55.82; IX, 79—X, 94; MCLL
  • Mississippi, Greenwood v Carmichael  55.Miss.5, 55.83; IX, 79—X, 137
  • Peacock v Greenwood  55.Miss.5a, 55.83a; IX, 79—XI, 8; 347 F2d 679 (CA 5 1965) , rev'd 384 US 808 (1966); MCLL
  • Mississippi, Greenwood v Weathers  55.Miss.5aa , 55.83aa; X, 13, 94, 137
  • Drew, Mississippi v McNair  55.Miss.6, 55.84; IX, 79—X, 137; 10 RRLR 1749 (CA 5 1965)
  • Drew, Mississippi v Burns  (55.Miss.6a) , 55.84a; X, 13
  • Burns v Williford (Drew, Miss)  55.Miss.6b, 55.84b; X, 13, 137
  • Cameron v Johnson  55.Miss.7, 55.85; IX, 79—XIV, 29; 262 FSupp 873 (SD Miss) , 381 US 741 (1965) , aff'd 390 US 611 (1968) ; MCLL
  • Dennis v Johnson  55.Miss.7a; XI, 8
  • Mississippi v Hosmen (Canton)  (55.Miss.8) , 55.86; X, 13
  • Mississippi v Watters  (55.Miss.9) , 55.90; X, 94
  • Mississippi v Hartfield, Anderson  55.Miss.9a; XIII, 22, 36; 363 F2d 869 (CA 5 1965) , 367 F2d 362 (CA 5 1965) ; MCLL
  • Meridian v Wright, Kelso  (55.Miss.10) , 55.98; X, 95
  • Collins v Jackson  55.Miss.11; X, 137—XIII, 36; MCLL
  • Mississippi v Evers, 517 Defs  55.Miss.12; XI, 8
  • Jackson v Young  55.Miss.13; XI, 8
  • Mississippi v Raymond  55.Miss.14; XI, 66
  • Mississippi v Chaffee; Chaffee v Johnson  55.Miss.15; XII, 12; 229 FSupp 445 (SD Miss 1964), aff'd 352 F2d 514 (CA 5) , cd 384 US 956 (1966)
  • Jackson v Smith  55.Miss.16; XII, 12
  • Canton v C O Chinn, Jr  55.Miss.17; XII, 12
  • Canton v C O Chinn, Sr  55.Miss.17a; XII, 12
  • Mississippi v Frentz  55.Miss.18; XII, 12
  • Mississippi v Boal  55.Miss.19; XII, 12
  • West Point v Lockard  55.Miss.20; XII, 12—XIII, 22
  • West Point v Buffington  55.Miss.21; XII, 12—XIII, 22
  • Mississippi v 18 Boycotters  55.Miss.22; XII, 12—XIII, 22
  • Mississippi v Newell  55.Miss.23; XII, 12
  • Mississippi v 43 Defs  55.Miss.24; XII, 12
  • Mississippi v 35 Defs  55.Miss.24a, XII, 12
  • 265 Defendants v Grenada  55.Miss.25; XIII, 22
  • Smith v Grady (Hattiesburg)  55.Miss.26; XIV, 30; 411 F2d 181 (CA 5 1969)
MISSOURI
  • Missouri v Defs (Charleston)  (55.Mo.1) , 55.30; VIII, 8, 71
  • Missouri v Lewis, Dunlap, Adams, Kundra  (55.Mo.2) , 55.31; VIII, 8, 125
NEBRASKA
  • Holdridge v US  (55.Neb.1) , 120.19; VI, 8; 282 F2d 302 (CA 8 1960)
  • Nebraska v Burns and McCaslin  55.Neb.2; XIV, 30
NEVADA
  • Nevada v Williams  (55.Nev.1) , 55.9; VII, 4
NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • New Hampshire v Defs  (55.NH.b) , 58.19; VI, 104
  • New Hampshire v Harvey  55.NH.1; XI, 66; MCLL
  • New Hampshire v Benson, Harvey  55.NH.2; XI, 66—XIII, 23
  • New Hampshire v Benson, Lyttle  55.NH.3; XI, 66
NEW JERSEY
  • Kovacs v Cooper  (55.NJ.a) ; 336 US 77 (1949) ; MCLL
  • New Jersey v Whipper (Elizabeth)  (55.NJ.1) , 55.69; IX, 5—X, 93
  • Greeman v Township Committee of Mahwah  55.NJ.2; XII, 12—XIII, 23
NEW YORK
  • New York v Carcel and Collazo  (55.NY.1) , 55.1; I, 67—III, 22; 144 NE2d 81 (NY Ct of App 1957)
  • New York v DeHahn and Horowitz  (55.NY.2) , 57.6; III, 23
  • New York v Donegan  (55.NY.3) , 55.2; III, 46—V, 2; MCLL
  • Peck v New York  (55.NY.a) , 57.1, 58.2; II, 2—VI, 55; 163 NE2d 866 (NY Ct of App 1959) , cd 365 US 662 (1961)
  • New York v Blossom  (55.NY.aa) , 58.12; V, 48
  • New York v Schmidt  (55.NY.b) , 58.14; VI, 104
  • New York v Hoffman  (55.NY.bb) , (411.h) , 58.14a; VI, 104
  • New York v Best  (55.NY.c) , 58.15; VI, 104
  • New York v Galamison  (55.NY.a), 55.70a; X,93; 248 NYS2d 358 (Kings Co Sup Ct 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Blechner, Addabbo  (55.NY.5), 55.93; X,94
  • Turner v New York  55.NY.6, 55.94; X,94—XIII,23; 272 NYS2d 1003 (NY Ct of App), cd 386 US 1011 (1967); MCLL
  • New York v Mallory  (55.NY.7), 55.95; X,94
  • New York v Potter, Wiley  55.NY.8, 55.97; X,95—XIII,23
  • New York v Johnson, Galamison  55.NY.9, 55.100; X,95,137
  • New York v 18 CORE Defs  55.NY.10; X,137
  • New York v Rosenberg  55.NY.11; XI,66—XIII,23
  • New York v Dorsey  55.NY.12; XI,66—XIII,23
  • New York v Demonstrators  55.NY.13; XI,67
  • Re Arrest of 64 Queens Parents  55.NY.14; XII,12
  • NYC v Green  55.NY.15; XII,12—XIII,23
  • New York v Katz  55.NY.16; XII,12—XIII,23; MCLL; ACLU
  • Hempstead v Kidd  55.NY.18; XIII,23
  • Street v New York  55.NY.19; XIII,23—XIV, 30; 229 NE2d 187 (NY Ct of App 1969), rev'd & rem 394 US 576 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Neier  55.NY.20; XIV,30
  • Port of New York Authority v Wolin  55.NY.21; XIV,30; 268 FSupp 855 (SD NY 1966), 392 F2d 83 (CA 2 1968), cd 393 US 940 (1968)
NORTH CAROLINA
  • North Carolina v Cyburn  (55.NC.a), 551.NC.2; IV,36; 101 SE2d 295 (NC Sup Ct 1958)
  • North Carolina v Frinks  (55.NC.1), 55.26; VIII,8—X,93; cd 379 US 863 (1964)
  • North Carolina v Rev LaGarde  (55.NC.2), 55.27; VIII,8
  • North Carolina v Fox (Edenton)  (55.NC.3), 55.88; X,13; 136 SE2d 761 (NC Sup Ct 1964)
  • North Carolina v Leary  55.NC.4; XI,8; 140 SE2d 756 (NC Sup Ct 1965)
OHIO
  • Steubenville v Kilburn  (55.Ohio.a); MCLL
  • Ohio v Ball  55.Ohio.1; XI,8
  • Leedy v Sausser  55.Ohio.2; XIV,30
OKLAHOMA
  • Wood v Oklahoma  (55.Okla.a); MCLL
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Pennsylvania v Rodill  (55.Pa.1), 55.12; VII,4,71
  • Amalgamated Food Employees, Local 590 v Logan Valley Plaza  55.Pa.3; XIV,30; 227 A2d 874 (Pa Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 391 US 308 (1968)
  • Pennsylvania v Haugh  55.Pa.4; XIV, 30; MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • US v Defendants  (55.SC.a), 120.21; VI, 8
  • Sumter v Singletary  (55.SC.1), 55.22; VII, 103
  • Sumter v Gregg  (55.SC.2), 55.23; VII, 104
  • DeLee v St George  55.SC.3; XI,8—XIII, 23
  • South Carolina v 6 Defs  55.SC.4; XI, 8
  • South Carolina v 16 Defs  55.SC.5; XI, 8
TENNESSEE
  • Tennessee v Defs (Madison Co)  (55.Tenn.1), 55.7; VI,5—VIII, 7
  • Bacon v Tennessee  55.Tenn.2; X,138; 385 SW2d 107 (Tenn Sup Ct 1964)
TEXAS
  • Houston v Schact  55.Tex.1; XIII, 23
VIRGINIA
  • Norfolk v Giddens  (55.Va.a), 552.Va.6; V, 68
  • Danville Va Cases  (55.Va.b); VIII, 124
  • Baines v Danville; McGhee v Danville  55.Va.1, 55.35; VIII, 125—XII, 13; 220 FSupp 407 (WD Va 1963), 321 F2d 643 (CA 4 1963), 337 F2d 579 (CA 4), cd 381 US 939 (1965); 357 F2d 756 (CA 4), aff'd 384 US 890 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Chase v Aiken  55.Va.2, 55.36; VIII, 125—XI, 8; 337 F2d 579 (CA 4 1964), cd 381 US 939 (1965)
  • Virginia v Defs (Danville)  (55.Va.2a), 55.36a; X, 93
  • Griffin v Hay  55.Va.3; X, 138; 239 FSupp 560 (ED Va 1965), 10 RRLR 111 (1965)
  • Re 20 Demonstrators  55.Va.4; XIII, 23
  • Hubbard v Virginia  55.Va.5; XIII, 23; aff'd 152 SE2d 250 (Va Sup Ct of App 1963)
  • Re Suzanne Williams  55.Va.6; XIII, 24
WASHINGTON
  • Seattle v Dixon  55.Wash.1; XIV, 31
WISCONSIN
  • Wisconsin v Givens, Weaver, Taylor  (55.Wisc.1), 55.71; IX, 5—XI, 67; 135 NW2d 780 (Wis Sup Ct 1965), 10 RRLR 983 (1965)
  • Wisconsin v Groppi, Miles  55.Wisc.2; XI, 67—XII, 13
WYOMING
  • Wyoming v Springer  (55.Wyo.1), 120.7; IV, 4
56. Against and Concerning Minors (including Contributing to Delinquency) (and 24, 430, 560)
  • Gans v Ohio  (56.a); 151 NE2d 709 (Ohio Sup Ct 1958), cd 359 US 945 (1959); MCLL; ACLU
  • South Carolina v Carter  (56.1), 552.SC.3c; VII, 63—XII, 13; 372 US 229 (1963); MCLL
  • White, Cromwell v Maryland  56.10; IX, 6—X, 95; 192 A2d 777, 194 A2d 88 (Md Ct of App 1963)
  • Florida v ANE  56.11; IX, 6—XII, 13; 156 So2d 525 (Fla DCA 1 1963), 158 So2d 513 (Fla Sup Ct 1963), 167 So2d 769 (Fla DCA 1 1964)
  • Alabama v Defs (Selma)  56.12; IX, 6—X, 95
  • Americus v 32 Defs  56.13; IX, 6—X, 95
  • Florence v Myers  56.14; IX, 80—XII, 13; 9 RRLR 144 (MD Fla 1964); MCLL
  • Ohio v McLaughlin  56.15; X, 95—XI, 67; 212 NE2d 635 (Ct App Cuyahoga Co 1965)
  • California v Comfort  56.16; X, 138
  • In re Dorothy Wright  56.17; XI, 8; 10 RRLR 1258 (MD Ala 1965)
  • Mississippi v Gellatly  56.18; XI, 8
  • In re Long  56.19; XI, 9—XII, 13; 184 So2d 86 (Miss Sup Ct 1966)
  • Mississippi v Guyot  56.20; XI, 9, 67; 175 So2d 184 (Miss Sup Ct 1965)
  • Oakland v Comfort  56.21; XI, 9
  • In re 13 Minors  56.22; XI, 67
  • South Carolina v Lee, Davidson  56.23; XI, 67
  • Dokes v Arkansas  56.24; XII, 13—XIII, 24; 409 SW2d 827 (Ark Sup Ct 1966), cd 389 US 901 (1967)
  • Louisiana v Hicks  56.25; XII, 13
  • Louisiana v 8 Picketers  56.26; XII, 13
57. Against Vagrancy, Loitering (and 304)
  • Florida v Parker  (57.a), 552.Fla.5; V, 100—VII, 30
  • Florida ex rel Parker v Jacksonville  (57.b), 552.Fla.5a; VI, 47
  • Tallahassee v Parker  (57.c), 552.Fla.5b; VI, 75
  • Arizona v Papcun  (57.1), 57.2; VI, 5
  • New York v Panagakos  (57.2), 57.3; II, 3—III, 3
  • Louisiana v Trumpower  57.3; VII, 104—X, 95
  • California v Aykens and Wallace  (57.d), 57.4; II, 3—III, 68
  • Georgia v Sherrod, Allen  57.4; VIII, 8—X, 15
  • Mississippi v Rev A Jones (Jackson)  57.5; VIII, 71
  • Alabama v Zellner  57.6; VIII, 72
  • Alabama v Zellner  57.7; VIII, 72, 127
  • Zellner v Thetford, Smith, Riggs, Lingo  57.8; VIII, 72, 94; MCLL
  • California v Sandness  57.9; VIII, 127—X, 95; 40 CR 581 (CA 1 Div 1 1964)
  • Albany v Harris  57.10; X, 15—XIII, 24; MCLL
  • California v Palmer  57.11; X, 95—XI, 9
  • California v Mellman  57.12; X, 96
  • New York v Miller  57.13; X, 96—XIII, 24; MCLL; ACLU
  • Hicks v Washington, DC  57.14; X, 96—XII, 13; 197 A2d 154 (DC Ct of App 1964), 383 US 252 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Flint v Baldwin  57.15; X, 96; MCLL
  • New York v Smith  57.16; XI, 9
  • Hillegas v Sams  57.17; XI, 9; 349 F2d 859 (CA 5 1965), cd 383 US 928 (1966)
  • Alabama v Levin  57.18; XI, 9—XIII, 24
  • Georgia v 40 Prostitutes  57.19; XI, 67
  • Minneapolis v Hadley  57.20; XI, 67—XII, 13; MCLL; ACLU
  • Arizona v Soffer  57.21; XII, 13
  • New Orleans v Cordier  57.22; XII, 13
  • Louisiana v Hill  57.23; XII, 13
  • Detroit v Wedlow  57.24; XII, 13—XIII, 24; MCLL
  • New York v Hirshhorn  57.25; XII, 13—XIII, 24; MCLL
  • In re Hoffman  57.26; XIII, 24; 67 C2d 845 (Sup Ct Calif 1967), 64 CR 97 (Sup Ct Calif 1967)
  • Fenster v Leary  57.27; XIII, 24; 264 FSupp 153 (SD NY 1966), 386 US 10 (1967); and see 229 NE2d 426 (CA NY 1967)
  • Ricks v US  57.28; XIV, 31; 228 A2d 316 (DC Ct of App 1967), 414 F2d 1097 (CA DC 1968), 414 F2d 1111 (CA DC 1968)
  • Parr v Monterey Municipal Court, People of California  57.29; XIV, 31; I ACQ 29; MCLL; ACLU
  • Lazarus v Faircloth  57.30; XIV, 31; 301 FSupp 266 (SD Fla 1969)
  • Smith v Hill  57.31; XIV, 31; 285 FSupp 556 (ED NC 1968)
  • Gomez v Layton  57.32; XIV, 31; 394 F2d 764 (CA DC 1968)
  • California v Magezis, Biderman  57.33; XIV, 31
58. Against Trespassing (and 541, 542, 551, 552)
ALABAMA
  • Embry and King v Montgomery  (58.Ala.1), 552.Ala.4a; V, 67—XI, 53; 5 RRLR 1102 (Cir Ct 1960), 140 So2d 290, 291 (Ala Ct of App 1962), 168 So2d 30, 495 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • Montgomery v King, Embry  (58.Ala.2), 552.Ala.4a; V, 99—XI, 53; 140 So2d 290, 291 (Ala Ct of App 1962), 168 So2d 30, 495 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • Charleston v Defendants  (58.Ala.3), 552.Ala.6; V, 67
  • Birmingham v Burks  (58.Ala.4), 552.Ala.10; V, 99—VIII, 60
  • Gober v Birmingham  (58.Ala.5), 552.Ala.11; VII, 123—VIII, 117; 133 S2d 697 (Ala Ct of App 1961), rev'd 373 US 374 (1963)
  • Alabama v Zellner  (58.Ala.6), 58.3; VIII, 8—X, 15
  • Alabama v Student Defs (Huntsville)  (58.Ala.7), 58.6; VIII, 72—X, 96
  • Selma v Bennett  (58.Ala.8), 58.43; X, 97, 138
ARIZONA
  • US v Wheeler  (58.Ariz.1), 120.24; VI, 83
CALIFORNIA
  • California v 52 Defs  (58.Calif.1), 57.1; V, 47
  • US v Henry Foster  (58.Calif.2), 123.24; VIII, 12, 128
  • Poland v California  (58.Calif.3), 58.1; VII, 39—IX, 80; cd 377 US 939 (1964); ACLU
  • California v Defs  (58.Calif.4), 58.8; IX, 6, 40
  • California v Bradley  (58.Calif.5), 58.11; IX, 6
  • California v Hallinan (San Francisco)  (58.Calif.6), 58.15; IX, 41—X, 138
  • California v Bradley (San Francisco)  (58.Calif.7), 58.16; IX, 41—XI, 67
  • California v Sims (San Francisco)  58.Calif.8, 58.17; IX, 41—XII, 14; cd 382 US 947 (1965); MCLL
  • California v Burbridge (San Francisco)  58.Calif.9, 58.18; IX, 41—XIII, 25; cd 386 US 1030, 1031 (1967)
  • US v Ballard (San Francisco)  (58.Calif.10), 58.23; IX, 81—X, 16
  • California v Wright (Los Angeles)  58.Calif.11, 58.28; X, 17—XIII, 24
  • California v Green  (58.Calif.13), 58.29; X, 17—XI, 9; MCLL
  • California v Okun  (58.Calif.14), 58.30; X, 17, 96
  • California v Minkin, Hoefer, Hirsch (Los Angeles)  (58.Calif.15), 58.31; X, 17, 138; MCLL
  • California v Gray  (58.Calif.17), 58.31a; X, 17—XI, 9
  • California v Comfort, Goldberg  58.Calif.18, 58.36; X, 96—XIII, 25; cd 386 US 987 (1967); MCLL
  • US v Chenery, Morris  (58.Calif.19), 58.37; X, 96
  • California v Aronson  58.Calif.20, 58.49; XI, 67—XIII, 25
  • California v Thomson  58.Calif.20a; XIII, 25
  • California v Henderson and Manganiello  58.Calif.21, 58.50; XI, 68—XIII, 25
  • California v Hutchinson, Calvelage  58.Calif.22, 58.51; XI, 68—XIII, 25; MCLL
  • California v Comfort  (58.Calif.23), 58.36a; XI, 67; MCLL
  • California v Meriweather  58.Calif.24; XII, 14
  • California v Heinemann  58.Calif.24a; XII, 14 —XIV, 27
  • US v Bishop, Smith, Tavalin and Kangas  58.Calif.24b; XII, 14—XIII, 25; 261 FSupp 969 (ND Cal 1966); MCLL
  • California v 9 Digiorgio Pickets  58.Calif.25; XII, 14
  • California v Voorhees, Johnson  58.Calif.26; XIII, 25
  • California v Chavez, Saladini, Hartmire  58.Calif.27; XIII, 25
  • Parrish v Muni Ct  58.Calif.28; XIII, 25; MCLL
  • Oakland v Kennedy  58.Calif.30; XIII, 26
  • Oakland v Ganoung  58.Calif.31; XIII, 26
  • Van Nuys v Shinoff  58.Calif.32; XIV, 31
  • Oakland v Demonstrators  58.Calif.33; XIV, 32
  • California v Garrett  58.Calif.34; XIV, 32
  • California v Long  58.Calif.35; XIV, 32; MCLL
COLORADO
  • Colorado v Kofi  (58.Colo.1), 551.Colo.2; V, 66
CONNECTICUT
  • Connecticut v Lyttle  (58.Conn.3), 123.25; VIII, 12
DELAWARE
  • Delaware v Anderson, Livingston  (58.Dela.1), 58.2; VII, 72—VIII, 8
  • Delaware v Brown  (58.Dela.2), 58.19; IX, 81; 195 A2d 379 (Dela Sup Ct 1963)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • US v Hobson and Kessler  (58.DC.1), 58.14; IX, 41
  • US v Goff and Goodwin  (58.DC.2), 58.14a; IX, 41
  • US v Whittlesey (District of Columbia)  (58.DC.3), 58.14b; IX, 41—X, 96
FLORIDA
  • Parrot v Tallahassee  (58.Fla.1), 58.26; X, 17—XI, 9; rev'd 381 US 129 (1965)
  • Florida, Madison v Washington, McCall  (58.Fla.2), 58.41; X, 97
  • Florida v Wechsler  (58.Fla.3), 58.42; X, 97
  • Adderley v Florida  58.Fla.4, 58.52; XI, 68—XIII, 26; 175 So2d 249 (DCA 1965), aff'd 385 US 39 (1966)
GEORGIA
  • Atlanta v Defendants  (58.Ga.1), 552.Ga.1; V, 67—VI, 47
  • Samuels v Georgia; Martin v Georgia  (58.Ga.2), 552.Ga.4; V, 67—VII, 30; 118 SE2d 231, 233 (Ga Ct of App 1961)
  • Savannah v Lovgren  (58.Ga.a), 552.Ga.5; V, 67
  • Georgia v King  (58.Ga.3), 552.Ga.10; VI, 47 —VIII, 61
  • Georgia v Rev King (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.4), 552.Ga.10a; VI, 47, 98
  • Georgia v Rev Williams (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.5), 552.Ga.10b; VI, 47
  • Georgia v Sprayberry  (58.Ga.6), 552.Ga.10c; VI, 47
  • Georgia v Def (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.7), 552.Ga.11; VI, 47-VIII, 61
  • Georgia v 89 Defendants  (58.Ga.8), 552.Ga.12; VI, 75, 127
  • Georgia v 8 Doctors (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.9), 552.Ga.13; VI, 75—VIII, 61
  • Georgia v Defs (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.10), 551.Ga.7; VIII, 87—X, 76
  • Clark v Georgia  (58.Ga.11), 552.Ga.14; IX, 68—X, 78; 135 SE2d 270 (Ga Sup Ct 1964)
  • Georgia v Jones (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.12), 58.12; IX, 40—X, 138; 136 SE2d 358 (Ga Sup Ct 1964), cd 379 US 935 (1964)
  • Georgia v Jones (Atlanta)  (58.Ga.13), 58.13; IX, 41—X, 15
  • Georgia v Rachel  58.Ga.14, 58.21; IX, 81—XIII, 26; writ of prohibition den 377 US 987 (1964); 342 F2d 336 (CA 5 1965), 384 US 780 (1966); MCLL
  • US ex rel Tolg v Grimes, Sheriff  58.Ga.15, 58.33; X, 17—XIII, 26; 229 FSupp 289 (ND Ga 1964), 355 F2d 92 (CA 5 1966), cd 384 US 988 (1966)
  • Georgia v Mack  (58.Ga.16), 58.40; X, 97, 138; 139 SE2d 286 (Ga Sup Ct 1964)
  • Georgia v Defs (Savannah)  (58.Ga.17), 58.44; X, 97; 9 RRLR 838 (1964)
ILLINOIS
  • Illinois v Goduto  (58.Ill.1); 174 NE2d 385 (Ill Sup Ct 1961)
  • Illinois v 80 Defs  (58.Ill.2), 58.10; IX, 6
  • Illinois v Polk  (58.Ill.3), 58.38; X, 97
LOUISIANA
  • Louisiana v Peters  (58.La.1), 552.La.4; VI, 75
MARYLAND
  • Bell v Maryland  (58.Md.1), 552.Md.5; VIII, 61—X, 78; 204 A2d 54 (Md Ct of App 1964)
  • Maryland v Grubb  (58.Md.2), 58.4; VIII, 8
  • Maryland v Defs (Baltimore)  (58.Md.3), 58.5; VIII, 72
  • Maryland v CORE Defs  (58.Md.4), 58.39; XI, 67
  • Maryland v Bell  58.Md.5; XIV, 32
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Egleson v Massachusetts  58.Mass.1; XIV, 32; 244 NE2d 589 (Mass Sup Ct 1969), cd 395 US 336 (1969)
MICHIGAN
  • Michigan v Halprin, Harrison  (58.Mich.1), 58.48; XI, 67
  • Michigan v Halprin  58.Mich.2; XIII, 26
MISSISSIPPI
  • Mississippi v Smith (McComb)  (58.Miss.1), 58.32; X, 17
  • Mississippi v Dilworth  (58.Miss.2), 58.46; X, 138
  • Mississippi v Suggars  (58.Miss.3), 58.47; XI, 9
  • Greenwood v Carmichael  58.Miss.4; XII, 14
MISSOURI
  • Missouri v Def (Columbia)  (58.Mo.1), 552. Mo. 2; VI, 75—VIII, 61
NEBRASKA
  • US v Lyttle and Fortenberry  (58.Neb.1), 120.11; IV, 90
  • US v Enzer and White  (58.Neb.2), 120.12; IV, 90
NEW YORK
  • New York v 7 Defs  (58.NY.1), 58.9; IX, 6
  • New York v Collins (NYC)  (58.NY.2), 58.24; IX, 81—X, 96; 254 NYS 182 (Sup Ct 1964), 208 NE2d 467 (CA NY 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Martinez (NYC)  (58.NY.3), 58.27; X, 17; 250 NYS2d 28 (NYC Crim Ct 1964)
  • New York v Lawson, Fleisher  (58.NY.4), 58.34; X, 97, 138; 238 NYS2d 839 (NYC Crim Ct 1963), rev'd 254 NYS2d 300 (Sup Ct App Term 1964), aff'd 260 NYS2d 661 (NY Ct of App 1965); MCLL
  • New York v Day, Knapp  58.NY.5, 58.35; X, 97—XIII, 26
NORTH CAROLINA
  • New Bern v Defendants  (58.NC.1), 552.NC.1; V, 67, 100
  • North Carolina v Dutton  (58.NC.2), 552.NC.2; V, 67—VI, 98
  • Avent v North Carolina  (58.NC.3), 552.NC.3; V, 67—X, 78; 118 SE2d 47 (NC Sup Ct 1961), vac and rem 373 US 375 (1963); 137 SE2d 161 (NC Sup Ct 1964)
  • Williams v North Carolina  (58.NC.4), 552.NC.4; V, 67—X, 162; 117 SE2d 824 (NC Sup Ct 1961), vac and rem 378 US 548 (1964); 140 SE2d 529 (NC Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Raleigh v Forbes  (58.NC.5), 552.NC.6; V, 68
  • Durham v Edwards  (58.NC.6), 552.NC.7; V, 68
  • North Carolina v Bender, Malloy (Greensboro)  (58.NC.7), 552.NC.8; V, 100—VII, 63
  • Fox v North Carolina  (58.NC.8), 552.NC.9; VI, 75—X, 128; 118 SE2d 58 (NC Sup Ct 1961), vac and rem 378 US 587 (1964)
  • North Carolina v Defs (Rutherford)  (58.NC.9), 552.NC.10; VI, 98—VIII, 62
  • North Carolina v Nelson  (58.NC.10), 552.NC.11; VIII, 62
  • North Carolina v Dove  (58.NC.12), 58.22; IX, 81; 134 SE2d 684 (NC Sup Ct 1964)
  • Blow v North Carolina  (58.NC.13), 58.45; I, 81—X, 96; 135 Se2d 14, 17 (NC Sup Ct 1963), 379 US 684 (1965)
OHIO
  • Ohio v Schlesinger (Xenia)  (58.Ohio.a), 58.7; IX, 6—X, 96; 10 RRLR 999 (Greene Co Ct, Ohio 1965)
  • Ohio v Mitchell  58.Ohio.1; XII, 14—XIII, 26; MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Peterson v Greenville  (58.SC.1), 552.SC.8; V, 101—IX, 69; 123 SE2d 512 (SC Sup Ct 1961), 122 SE2d 826 (SC Sup Ct 1961), rev'd 373 US 244 (1963); MCLL
  • South Carolina v Davis (Orangeburg)  (58.SC.2), 552.SC.2b; VI, 76—X, 128; 123 SE2d 247 (SC Sup Ct 1961), rev'd 372 US 229 (1963)
  • Charleston v Mitchell  (58.SC.3), 552.SC.10; VI, 76—IX, 121; 123 SE2d 512 (SC Sup Ct 1961), 378 US 551 (1964)
  • Hamm v Rock Hill  (58.SC.4), 552.SC.4d; VII, 31—XI, 53; 128 SE2d 907 (Sup Ct SC 1962), vac and dism'd 379 US 306 (1964)
TEXAS
  • Texas v Wilson  (58.Tex.1), 58.25; IX, 81
VIRGINIA
  • Petersburg v Defendants  (58.Va.1), 551.Va.4; V, 66
  • Giles v Library Advisory Comm, Danville  (58.Va.a), 551.Va.5; V, 66—VII, 30; 5 RRLR 1140 (WD Va 1960)
  • Randolph v Virginia  (58.Va.2), 552.Va.5; V, 68—X, 79; 119 SE2d 817 (Va Sup Ct 1961), vac and rem 374 US 97 (1963)
  • Virginia v Rev Williams  (58.Va.3), 552.Va.8; V, 101—VII, 31
  • Tinsley v Richmond  (58.Va.4), 552.Va.5a; VI, 76—VII, 63; 119 SE2d 488 (Va Ct of App 1961), dism'd 368 US 18 (1961)
  • Virginia v James  (58.Va.5), 551.Va.7; VI, 97—IX, 68
  • Thompson v Virginia  (58.Va.6), 552.Va.10; VI, 76—XI, 53; vac and rem 374 US 100 (1963)
  • Wood v Virginia  (58.Va.8), 552.Va.10a; VI, 99—XI, 53; vac and rem 374 US 100 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Owen and Brumback v Virginia  (58.Va.9), 552.Va.11; VI, 76—VII, 31
59. Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities
  • Cole v Arkansas  (59.a); 216 SW2d 402 (Ark Sup Ct), aff'd 338 US 345 (1949)
  • US v Congress of Industrial Organizations, Murray  (59.b); 335 US 106 (1948); MCLL
  • US v Solow  (59.1), 20.6; I,2,33
  • Wisconsin v Joe Must Go Club of Wisconsin  (59.2), 10.22; I,1,69; 70 NW2d 681 (Wisc Sup Ct 1955)
  • US v UAW-CIO  (59.3), 56.1; I,1—III,22; 352 US 567 (1957); ACLU
  • Tennessee v Clark, Barksdale, Carawan, Sturgis  (59.4), 57.10; IV,89—V, 74
  • New York v Silfa  (59.5), 58.11; V,48
  • New York v Rosen  (59.6), 58.13; VI,55
  • US v Local 405, Teamsters Union  (59.7), 56.2; VI,82
  • Int'l Assn of Machinists v Street  (59.8), 56.3; VI,104—VII,4; 367 US 740 (1961); MCLL
  • Connecticut v Kanegson  (59.9), 58.20; VII,5
  • Louisiana v Rockwell  59.21; VII,5,104
  • North Carolina v Crowder, Mallory (Monroe)  59.22; VII,5—XI,68; Mallory extradition: Mallory v Sweeney, 173 Ohio St 536 (Ohio Sup Ct 1962), v McGettrick, cd 372 US 949 (1963); 139 SE2d 870 (NC Sup Ct 1965), 145 SE2d 335 (NC Sup Ct 1965), cd 382 US 22 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • North Carolina v Jay Van Covington  59.22a; VII,5—VIII,95; 128 SE2d 827 (NC Sup Ct 1963); North Carolina v Rorie, 128 SE2d 229 (NC Sup Ct 1962)
  • North Carolina v R Covington and Rorie  59.22b; VII,5—VIII,95
  • Georgia v Chas Jones  59.23; VII,39
  • Georgia v Brown  59.25; VII,72
  • Mississippi v Bevel  59.26; VII,72—VIII,9; MCLL
  • Mississippi v Henry (Clarksdale)  59.27; VII, 73—X,18; MCLL
  • Mississippi v Aaron Henry  59.27a; VIII,95—XIII,26; 154 So2d 289 (Miss Sup Ct 1963), 379 US 443 (1965); 198 So2d 213 (Miss Sup Ct), 388 US 901 (1967); MCLL
  • Kentucky v Pfhul and Duffy  59.28; VII,104—VIII,9
  • California v Gillespie  59.29; VIII,9,72; ACLU
  • California v Crnovic  59.30; VIII,9,72
  • Alabama v Mills  (59.c), 56.4; VIII,94,126; 176 So2d 884 (Ala Sup Ct 1965), rev'd and rem 384 US 214 (1966)
  • US v Hensley, Stacy, Turner, Engle  59.31; VIII,127—XIV,32; 374 F2d 341 (CA 6 1967), cd 388 US 923 (1967); MCLL
  • Kentucky v Gibson  59.31a; IX,82
  • Columbus, Ohio v Miqdadi  59.32; IX,7,41; MCLL
  • Louisiana v Davis (Baton Rouge)  59.33; IX,7—X,18; MCLL
  • Lubeck v Williams, Hosea (Savannah)  59.34; IX,7—X,98; 8 RRLR 1380 (Savannah Muni Ct 1963)
  • Anderson, Long v Alabama (Selma)  59.35; IX,7—X,98; 168 So2d 256 (Ala Ct of App 1964), cd 168 So2d 258 (Ala Sup Ct 1964)
  • Alabama v Allen (Selma)  59.35a; X,19,97,138; 170 So2d 423 (Ala Sup Ct 1964)
  • Mississippi v Brown (Walthall Co)  59.36; IX,82—X,138
  • Mississippi v Hancock (Leflore)  59.37; X,19—XIII,27
  • Mississippi v Kendrick (Lauderdale Co)  59.38; X,19,98
  • US v Warner  59.38a; X,19,98; 9 RRLR 1101 (SD Miss 1964)
  • New York v Fawcett (NYC)  59.39; X,19,98; MCLL; ACLU
  • Mississippi v Cocroft, Kabot  59.40; X,98
  • Mississippi v Kaminsky  59.41; X,98
  • Harvey v Mississippi  59.42; X,98,139; 340 F2d 263 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Georgia v Maddox  59.43; X,98
  • New York v Francis  59.44; X,98
  • Georgia v Wells  59.45; X,98
  • New Jersey v Hayden  59.46; X,98,139
  • Shustak v Brown  59.47; X,98
  • New Jersey v Brown  59.47a; X,98
  • Newton, Georgia v Templeton, Sherrod  59.48; X,139; MCLL
  • Re C O Chinn  59.49; XI.9
  • Natchez v Miller  59.50; XI,9
  • Mississippi v McGhee  59.51; XI,9
  • Mississippi v Maxwell  59.52; XI,10
  • Michigan v Brothman  (59.e), 124.37; XI,73—XIII,56; 145 NW2d 355 (CA Mich 1966), cd 389 US 1044 (1967)
  • Louisiana v Robt Lewis Jr  59.53; XI,10—XII,15; 199 So2d 907 (Sup Ct La 1967)
  • Selma v Webb  59.54; XI,15
  • Louisiana v Weary  59.55; XII,15
  • Louisiana v Pamela Smith  59.56; XII,15
  • Louisiana v Frazier  59.57; XII,15
  • San Francisco v Hunter's Point Defs  59.58; XII,15
  • San Francisco v Jacobs  59.59; XII,15
  • Berkeley v MacKaness  59.60; XII,15—XIII,27
  • California v Pontius  59.61; XII,15
  • Hawaii v Lombardi and Kent (Honolulu)  59.62, 124.39; XI,73—XIII,27
  • Mississippi v Howze  59.63; XII,15
  • Jackson v Faucette  59.64; XII,15
  • Washington v Mathews  59.65; XII,15
  • Mississippi v Raymond  59.66; XII,15
  • Mississippi v Slaughter  59.67; XII,15
  • New York v Eisenberg  59.68; XII,16—XIII,27
  • Tennessee v Braden  59.69; XII,16
  • Detroit v Judith Bowden  59.70; XII,16—XIII,27; 149 NW2d 771 (CA Mich 1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Alabama v Taylor  59.72; XIII,27
  • Alabama v House  59.73; XIII,27
  • Alabama v Hadnott, Moorer, Leon, Sims  59.74; XIII,27
  • Kirkland v Wallace  59.75; XIII,27—XIV,32; 403 F2d 413 (CA 5 1968); MCLL
  • California v Pollack  59.76; XIII,27
  • California v Smith  59.77; XIII,27
  • Los Angeles v Monroe  59.78; XIII,27
  • California v Brown  59.79; XIII,27
  • San Francisco v 29 Haight-Ashbury Defs  59.80; XIII,27
  • San Francisco v Edmundson, Heron  59.81; XIII,27
  • In re Mark Comfort  59.82; XIII,28
  • California v Bethea  59.83; XIII,28
  • California v Gray, Coleman  59.85; XIII,28—XIV,32; 63 CR 211 (DCA 1967)
  • California v Cooks  59.86; XIII,28
  • Atlanta v Carmichael  59.87; XIII,28
  • Chicago v 19 Defs  59.88; XIII,28
  • Louisiana v Tyson  59.89; XIII,28; 241 FSupp 142 (ED La 1965), 176 So2d 147 (La Sup Ct 1965), cd 382 US 942 (1965)
  • In re James Griffin  59.90; XIII,28
  • Mississippi v Chinn  59.91; XIII,28—XIV,32; 210 So2d 666 (Miss Sup Ct 1968)
  • Chisum v Fitzpatrick  59.92; XIII,28
  • US v Leary  59.94; XIII,28
  • New York v Twelve Masked Demonstrators  59.95; XIII,28
  • US v Hawke, Marin de Montmarin  59.97; XIII,29
  • Cleveland v Anderson  59.98; XIII,29—XIV,32; 13 Ohio App 2d 83 (Ohio Ct of App 1968); MCLL
  • Pennsylvania v Williams, Middleton, Ballard  59.99; XIII,29
  • Swain v Tennessee  59.100; XIII,29; 407 SW2d 452 (Tenn Sup Ct 1966)
  • Dallas v Wilkes  59.101; XIII,29
  • Virginia v State Prison Guard  59.102; XIII,29
  • Virginia v Price  59.103; XIII,29
  • Bardwell v Griffin  59.104; XIII,29
  • Fayette Co v Hortenstine  59.105; XIII,29
  • New York v Radich  59.106; XIII,29—XIV,33
  • Dalaware v Benett, Bertolette  59.107; XIV,33
  • Watts v US  59.108; XIV,33; 402 F2d 676 (CA DC 1968), rev'd and rem 394 US 705 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Rubin  59.109; XIV,33
  • Johnson v Florida  59.111; XIV,33; 202 So2d 852 (Fla Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 391 US 596 (1968); 216 So2d 7 (Fla Sup Ct 1968)
  • Wallace v Sampson (Greenwood)  59.112; XIV,33
  • Cortez v Schroering (Louisville)  59.113; XIV,33; MCLL
  • US v Tijerina  59.114; XIV,33; 407 F2d 349 (CA 10 1969), cd 396 US 843 (1969)
60. CIVIL SANCTIONS (and Contempt Charges)
61. Against Defamation, Libel, Slander (and 53)
  • Smith v Byrd  (61.a), 20.7; I,33
  • Larrick, Badger v Gilloon  (61.b); MCLL
  • Salzhandler v Caputo  (61.c); MCLL
  • Farmers Educational & Coop Union v WDAY  61.1; III,68—IV,74; 360 US 525 (1959); MCLL
  • Lamb v Stations WSM and WLAC, Rep Sutton  61.2; IV,4,42; 164 FSupp 928 (MD Tenn 1958)
  • Stover v Central Broadcasting Co  61.3; IV,42
  • Steinberg v O'Connor  61.4; IV,69—VII,104
  • Wanamaker v Lewis  61.5; IV, 69
  • Coleman v Newark Morning Ledger  61.6; IV, 69—V, 3; 149 A2d 193 (NJ Sup Ct 1959)
  • Barr v Matteo  61.7; IV, 90; rev'd 360 US 564 (1959)
  • Howard v Lyons  61.8; IV, 90; 360 US 593 (1959)
  • New York Times Co v Sullivan  61.9; V, 48—XIII, 29; 144 So2d 25 (Ala Sup Ct 1962), rev'd 376 US 254 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Sullivan v Montgomery Improvement Assn  (61.9a), 61.9-1; VI, 105
  • James v The New York Times  (61.9b), 61.9a; VI, 6—X, 19
  • Parks, Patterson v New York Times  (61.9c), 61.9b; VI, 6—X, 19; 308 F2d 475 (CA 5 1962), cd 376 US 949 (1964)
  • Patterson v New York Times  61.10; V, 48—X, 99; 308 F2d 474 (CA 5 1962), cd 376 US 949 (1964)
  • New York Times v Connor, Birmingham, Bessemer City Commrs  61.11; V, 48—XIII, 29; 291 F2d 492 (CA 5 1961), 310 F2d 133 (CA 5 1962), 365 F2d 567 (1966); ACLU
  • Bessemer City Commrs v The New York Times  61.12
  • Abernathy v Patterson  61.13; VI, 82—VII, 73; 295 F2d 452 (CA 5 1961), cd 368 US 986 (1962); ACLU
  • Bridges v Colonna  61.14; VI, 105
  • Sargent v Natl Broadcasting System  61.15; VII, 73
  • Barton v Gov Barnett  61.16; VII, 104—VIII, 10
  • Franklin v Paradise Am Legion Post 259  61.17; VIII, 10—XIII, 29
  • Pauling v Anti-Communist League, York Co  61.18; VIII, 95—X, 20
  • Pauling v National Review  61.18a; VIII, 95—XI, 68
  • Pauling v News Syndicate Co  61.18b; VIII, 95—X, 99; 335 F2d 659 (CA 2 1964), cd 379 US 968 (1965); MCLL
  • Pauling v Bellingham Publ Co  61.18c; VIII, 95
  • Pauling v Globe-Democrat Publishing Co  61.18d; VIII, 95—XIII, 29; 362 F2d 188 (CA 8 1966), cd 388 US 909 (1967)
  • Brent v Singlemann, Citizens Council of New Orleans  61.19; VIII, 127—X, 20
  • Harper v National Review, Buckley  61.20; IX, 8—XI, 68
  • Moore V P W Publishing Co  61.21; IX, 8—XII, 16; cd 382 US 978 (1965); MCLL
  • Normile v Amer Medical Assn  61.22; IX, 8—XI, 68; MCLL
  • Collins v Henry  61.23; IX, 8—X, 139; 158 So2d 28 (Miss Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 380 US 356 (1965); MCLL
  • Gadsden v Am Broadcasting Co  61.24; IX, 8—X, 20
  • Goldmark v Holden  61.25; IX, 42—X, 99
  • John Birch Society, Welch v NBC (Forth Worth)  61.26; X, 20—XIII, 30
  • Smooth v League of Women Voters  61.27; X, 99—XIII, 30; 36 FRD 4 (WD Mich 1964), and see 353 F2d 830 (CA 6 1965), 340 F2d 301 (CA 6 1964); MCLL
  • Belli v Curtis Publishing Co  61.28; X, 99
  • Walker v Associated Press  61.29; X, 99—XIII, 30; 393 SW2d 671 (Tex Ct Civ App 1965), rev'd 388 US 130 (1966)
  • Butts v Curtis Publishing Co  61.29a; XI, 10—XIII, 30; 225 FSupp 916 (ND Ga 1964), 351 F2d 702 (CA 5 1965), aff'd 388 US 130 (1967); MCLL
  • Associated Press v Walker  61.29b; XIII, 30
  • Frick v Stevens  61.30; XI, 10—XIV, 34
  • Gilligan v M L King, Farmer, CORE, Gray, Epton, Progressive Labor, Harlem Defense Council (NYC Sup Ct)  61.31; XI, 10—XIII, 31
  • Gilligan v M L King  61.31a; XI, 10—XIII, 31
  • Foster v Futorian  61.32; XI, 10
  • Baer v Rosenblatt  61.33; XI, 10—XII, 16; 203 A2d 773 (NH Sup Ct 1965), rev'd and rem 383 US 75 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pape v Time  61.35; XI, 68—XII, 16; 354 F2d 558 (CA 7 1965), cd 384 US 909 (1966)
  • Dodd v Pearson  61.36; XI, 68—XIV, 34; 279 FSupp 101 (DC DC 1968), 410 F2d 701 (CA DC 1969), cd 395 US 947 (1969)
  • Liberty Supermarket v SCLC  61.37; XI, 68
  • Heine v Raus  61.38; XI, 69—XIII, 31; 261 FSupp 570 (DC Md 1966), vac 399 F2d 785 (CA 4 1968); 305 FSupp 816 (DC Md 1969)
  • Ballard v McCannon  61.39; XII, 16—XIV, 34
  • Minsky v Stroden  61.40; XII, 16—XIV, 34
  • Kahn v Fox  61.41; XII, 17; 221 A2d 181 (Penn Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 935 (1966)
  • Driscoll v Toledo Blade Co  61.42; XII, 17; 210 NE2d 899 (Ohio Ct of App 1965), cd 385 US 948 (1966)
  • Zeinfeld v Hayes Freight Lines  61.43; XII, 17
  • Alabama v Reynolds  61.44; XIII, 31
  • Peet v Tocsin  61.45; XIII, 31; MCLL
  • Hallinan v Patrick  61.46; XIII, 31
  • Lombardo, Mullally v Stoke  61.47; XIII, 31
  • Ranous v Middleton, Wis School Bd, Hughes  61.48; XIII, 31
  • Carroll v Princess Anne Co  61.49; XIII, 31—XIV, 34; 230 A2d 452 (Md Ct of App 1967), rev'd 393 US 175 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Arkansas v Baker  61.50; XIII, 32
  • Becker v Philco Corp  61.51; XIII, 32; 234 FSupp 10 (ED Va 1964), aff'd 372 F2d 771 (CA 4 1967), cd 389 US 979 (1967)
  • Yorty v Los Angeles Times  61.52; XIV, 34
  • Dreksler v Time, Inc  61.53; XIV, 34
  • Goldwater v Ginzburg  61.54; XIV, 34; 261 FSupp 784 (SD NY 1966), aff'd 414 F2d 324 (CA 2 1969)
  • St Amant v Thompson  61.55; XIV, 35; 196 So2d 255 (La Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 390 US 727 (1968)
62. By Injunction in Labor Disputes (and 24)
  • International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v Ackerman  (62.a); 187 F2d 860 (CA 9 1951), cd 342 US 859 (1951); MCLL
  • Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp v Bakery & Confectionery Workers Union  62.1; X, 99, 139; 40 CR 233 (Calif Sup Ct 1964), cd 380 US 906 (1965)
  • New York v Tepedino, Lahab, and Viani  62.2; X, 99
  • Natl Maritime Union, United Marine Div, Local 333 v New York  62.3; X, 99
  • In re Kingsport Press  62.4; XI, 69
  • DiGiorgio Corp v Natl Farm Workers Assn  62.5; XII, 17
  • New York v Social Service Employees Union  62.6; XI, 69; MCLL
  • Social Service Employees v Dumpson  62.6a; XII, 17—XIII, 32
  • DiGiorgio Corp v National Farm Workers Assn  62.7; XIII,32
  • Bd of Educ, Borough of Union Beach v New Jersey Educ Assn  62.8; XIV,35; 247 A2d 867 (NJ Sup Ct 1968)
  • Public School Teachers v Orleans Parish School Bd  62.9; XIV,35
  • School Dist, Holland, Ottawa & Allegan Cos, Mich v Holland Educ Assoc  62.10; XIV,35; 157 NW2d 206 (Mich Sup Ct 1968); I ACQ 22
  • Illinois ex rel Clark, Atty Gen'l v Belsamo  62.11; XIV,35
63. By Injunction in Racial Situations (and 40-43, 550-557)
  • Krebiozen Research Foundation v Beacon Press  63.1; II,3,33; 134 NE2d 1 (Mass Sup Ct 1956), cd 352 US 848 (1956)
  • Alabama ex rel Gallion v Gray  63.2; VII,73—XI, 10; 7 RRLR 449 (Talladega Cir Ct 1962), 185 So2d 125 (Ala Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Mitnick d/b/a Central Fourth St Drugstore v Faire Share Org  63.3; VII,4—X, 100; 198 NE2d 765 (Ind Sup Ct 1964), cd 379 US 843 (1964); MCLL
  • Fair Share Organization v Nagdeman, Philip & Sons  63.3a; IX,83—X,100; 191 NE 2d 1 (Ind Sup Ct 1963), 193 NE2d 257 (Ind App Ct 1963), cd 379 US 843 (1964); MCLL
  • Fair Share Organization v Kroger Co, Local 1460 Retail Clerks  (63.3b), 55.4; V,23—VII,4; 176 NE2d 205 (Ind App Ct 1961); ACLU
  • B & B Cash Grocery Stores v Young Adults for Progressive Action  63.4; VII,4—X,21; 7 RRLR 192 (Fla Cir Ct 1961), 151 So2d 877 (Fla DCA 1963); MCLL
  • Kelley v Page; Anderson v Albany  63.5; VIII,10—X,21; 321 F2d 649 (CA 5 1963), 9 RRLR 1115 (CA 5 1964)
  • Potomac Electric Power Co v Washington Chap of CORE  63.6; VIII,10—IX,43; 209 FSupp 559 (1962), 210 FSupp 419 (1962)
  • Walker v Birmingham  63.7; IX,8—XIII,33; 8 RRLR 436 (Ala 10th Jud Cir Ct 1963), on removal and remand, 217 FSupp 947 (ND Ala 1963), 181 So2d 493 (Ala Sup Ct 1966), aff'd 388 US 307 (1967)
  • Alabama v US  63.7a; IX,8; 373 US 545 (1963)
  • Salter v Jackson  63.8; IX,8—XI,11; 8 RRLR 433 (Miss Sup Ct 1963), 374 US 818 (1963); 176 So2d 63 (Miss Sup Ct 1965)
  • NAACP v Thompson  63.8a; IX,43—XII,17; 321 F2d 199 (CA 5 1963), 357 F2d 831 (CA 5 1966), cd 385 US 820 (1966)
  • Zellner v Lingo  63.9; IX,8—X,22; 334 F2d 620 (CA 5 1964)
  • Alabama ex rel Flowers v M Robinson  63.10; IX,8; MCLL
  • Ex parte Marvin Robinson  63.10a; IX,9—X,100; 168 So2d 491 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • Clinton v CORE  63.11; IX,9—X,22; 9 RRLR 1131 (CA 5 1964), 341 F2d 298 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • US ex rel Louisiana v CORE  63.12; IX,9
  • Tallahassee v 150 Defs  63.13; IX,9
  • Porzio v Williams  63.14; IX,9—X,22
  • US v Patridge  63.15; IX,9; MCLL
  • Sheraton-Palace Hotel v Bensusen  63.16; IX,43
  • Burford v Nonviolent Action Comm  63.17; IX,43—X,22
  • Long v Isen  63.18; IX,43—X,22
  • Carson v Corleto  63.19; IX,43,83
  • Nichols v Phila Chapter of CORE  63.19a; IX,43,83; 9 RRLR 326 (Phila Ct of Com Pleas 1964)
  • Levitt & Sons v Prince George Co CORE  63.20; IX,83—X,100; 221 FSupp 541 (DC Md 1963)
  • San Diego Gas & Elec Co v CORE  63.21; IX,83—XIII,33; 50 CR 638 (DCA 1964); MCLL
  • Bank of America v CORE  63.22; IX,83—X,100
  • California v Brown  63.22a; IX,83—X,139; MCLL
  • California v von Blum  63.22b; X,22—XI,11; 47 CR 666 (Super Ct App Dept 1965)
  • California v Poe  63.22c; XI,11; 47 CR 670 (Super Ct App Dept 1965)
  • California v Brindley  63.22d; XI,11; 47 CR 668 (Super Ct App Dept 1965)
  • Curtis, Grand v Boeger  63.23; X,22—XIII,33; 374 SW2d 557 (Mo Ct of App 1964), 227 FSupp 438 (ED Mo 1964), 236 FSupp 831, 240 FSupp 475, 331 F2d 675 (CA 8), 362 F2d 999, cd 386 US 914 (1967); MCLL
  • Lewis v Clark  63.24; X,23,100
  • Dallas County v SNCC  63.24a; X,23—XI,11; 10 RRLR 234 (SD Ala 1965)
  • US v McLeod  63.25; X,23,100; 229 FSupp 383 (SD Ala 1964)
  • Farmer v Moses  63.26; X,23; 232 FSupp 154 (SD NY 1964)
  • California v Defs (Los Angeles)  63.27; X,23
  • Boynton v Clark (Selma)  63.28; X,100—XIII,33; 10 RRLR 1472 (SD Ala 1965), 362 F2d 992 (CA 5 1966), 12 RRLR 620 (CA 5 1967)
  • M L King v Baker  63.28a; X,100,139
  • US v Clark  63.28b; XI,11; 249 FSupp 720 (SD Ala 1965); MCLL
  • Williams and US Intervenor v Wallace  63.28c; XI,11; 240 FSupp 100 (MD Ala 1965)
  • COFO v Local Officials (McComb)  63.29; X,100; MCLL
  • NAACP and Safeway Trials v CORE  63.30; X,100,139; MCLL
  • Hicks v Knight (Bogalusa)  63.31; X,139—XI,11; 10 RRLR 1504 (ED La 1965); MCLL
  • US v KKK  63.31a; XI,11,69; 10 RRLR 1449 (ED La 1965), 11 RRLR 53 (ED La 1965), 250 FSupp 330 (1965)
  • Hicks v Cutrer  63.31b; XI,11
  • Dilworth v Riner  63.32; X,139; 343 F2d 226 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • In re King  63.33; X,139
  • Alabama ex rel Wallace v Lewis  63.34; XI,12; 10 RRLR 1502 (ND Ala 1965)
  • Georgia v 200 Defs  63.35; XI,12
  • Griffin v Ryan  63.36; XI,12,69; MCLL
  • Coppock v Patterson  63.37; XI,12
  • Mississippi v Bass, Klein, Wilcox  (63.37a), 73.Miss.14; XI,15—XII,20; MCLL
  • Shelton v Simpson  63.38; XI,12
  • Chinn v Canton  63.39; XI,12
  • Wilson v Marshall  63.40; XI,12
  • Mississippi v Harris  63.40; XI,12
  • Easton v Nosser  63.42; XI,12
  • Natchez v NAACP  63.42a; XI,12; 11 RRLR 147 (SD Miss 1965)
  • Tracy v Robbins  63.43; XI,12—XIV,35; 373 F2d 13 (CA 4 1967)
  • Jackson v Bull  63.44; XI,12
  • Thriftimart v United Civil Rights Comm  63.45; XI,12
  • Chester Branch NAACP v Chester  63.46; XI,69; 253 FSupp 707 (ED Pa 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Bd of Educ (Crenshaw Co) v Barnett  63.47; XII,17; 251 FSupp 917 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Bd of Educ of Marengo, Demopolis v Boone; Alabama v SCLC; Bd of Educ of Greensboro v Days  63.48; XII,18
  • School Bd of Greensboro v SCLC  63.49; XII, 18
  • Madison Parish School Bd v Voters League  63.50; XII,18—XIII,33
  • Liberty Grocery v Moore  63.51; XII,18—XIII, 33
  • Guyot v Rainey  63.52; XII,18—XIII,33
  • Chinn v Johnson  63.53; XII,18—XIV,35; 294 FSupp 909 (SD Miss 1969); MCLL
  • 24 Merchants v Civil Rights Organizations  63.55; XII,18—XIV,35
  • Baker v Bindner  63.56; XIII,34; 274 FSupp 658 (WD Ky 1967); MCLL
  • Jewell v Douglas  63.57; XIII,34
  • Grenada School Bd v Civil Rights Groups  63.58; XIII,34
  • US v Ayers  63.59; XIII,34
  • Moore v Weisman  63.60; XIII,34—XIV,35
  • Ditto v Chicago  63.61; XIV,35; 230 NE2d 41 (Ill App Ct 1967), cd 393 US 1028 (1969)
64. Against Miscellaneous Activities
  • Re 53 Brooklyn College Students  64.1; V,48
  • Re Newtown High School Senior  64.2; VI,55
  • Re James L Creighton  (64.a), 64.2; VI,82—VII,104
  • Emergency Civil Liberties Comm v Commodore Hotel  64.3; VII,39
  • Reed v CORE  64.4; IX,84—X,100
  • Matter of McShane  64.5; X,23,100; 332 F2d 855 (CA 5 1964)
  • Faneca v US  64.6; X,23,139; 332 F2d 872 (CA 5 1964), cd 380 US 971 (1965)
  • Windmiller v Toothman  64.8; XI,69
  • Massachusetts v Williams  64.9; XII,18
  • Bardwell v Griffin  64.10; XII,18
  • Allen v Edwards  64.11; XII,18
  • Massachusetts v Suzanne Williams  64.12; XIII,34
  • Chronicle Publishing Co v Gain  64.13; XIII, 34; MCLL
  • Aluminum Co of America v Lincoln Towers Tenants  64.14; XIII,34
  • Sellars v NAACP  64.15; XIII,34
  • Hornstein d/b/a Stanley's Dept Store v NAACP  64.16; XIII,34
  • Alameda Co v Regents of Univ of California  64.17; XIV,36
  • Gallagher v Mission Tenants Union  64.18; XIV,36; MCLL
  • A G Corp v SCLC  64.19; XIV,36
  • California v Los Angeles Free Press  64.20; XIV,36
  • Feldman v Los Angeles Free Press  64.20a; XIV,36; MCLL
  • Hibbs v Neighborhood Organization  64.21; XIV,36; 252 A2d 622 (Pa Sup Ct 1968)
70. PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS
71. In Alleging Standing To Sue
  • Wisconsin ex rel Brister v Weston & Rice  (71.a); 6 NW2d 648 (Wisc Sup Ct 1942); ACLU
  • Manchel v Co of Los Angeles  71.1; XIII,35; 54 CR 53 (DCA 1966)
72. In Raising and Preserving Constitutional Questions
  • Glover v Georgia  72.1; VII,104; 124 SE2d 484 (Ga Ct of App 1962)
  • Jacobs v New York  72.2; XIII,35; 388 US 431 (1967)
  • Zwickler v Koota; Golden v Zwickler  72.3; XIII,35—XIV,36; 261 FSupp 244 (DC ED NY 1966), 386 US 906 (1967), rev'd and rem 389 US 241 (1967); 290 FSupp 244 (DC ED NY 1968), 394 US 104 (1968)
73. In Removing From State to Federal Courts
ALABAMA
  • Alabama v Davis  (73.Ala.a), 73.Ala.1; XI,13
  • Alabama v Chace  (73.Ala.1), 55.80, 55.Ala.6; IX,84—X,24
  • Alabama v Lyon  73.Ala.2; XI,13
  • Eutaw Housing Authority v Dew  73.Ala.3; XI,13
  • Morgan v Wardy  73.Ala.4; XI,13
  • Tuscaloosa v Rogers  73.Ala.5; XI,13,70; 353 F2d 78 (CA 5 1965), 8 ALR3d 301,307 (1966)
  • Alabama v Wright  73.Ala.6; XI,13—XII,19
  • Hughley v Opelika  73.Ala.7; XI,13—XIII,35; 251 FSupp 566 (MD Ala 1965)
ARKANSAS
  • Forrest City Cases  73.Ark.1; XI,13
CALIFORNIA
  • California v Burbridge  (73.Calif.1), 58.18; IX,85
FLORIDA
  • Florida v Robinson, Dawson, Johnson  (73.Fla.a), 55.Fla.2; X,25,101
  • Eubanks v Florida  73.Fla.1; XI,13; 242 FSupp 472 (MD Fla 1965); MCLL
GEORGIA
  • Georgia v Rachel  (73.Ga.a), 58.21; X,25—XII,19; aff'd 384 US 780 (1966)
  • Newton, Georgia v Templton  (73.Ga.b), 59.48; X,140
  • Shephard v Griffin  73.Ga.1; XI,13
  • Dublin v Bolden  73.Ga.2; XI,13
  • Crawfordville v Cooper, Jr  73.Ga.3; XI,13
  • Crawfordville v Barcus  73.Ga.4; XI,14
  • Columbus v Saucier  73.Ga.5; XI,14
  • Sims v SNCC  73.Ga.6; XI,14
KANSAS
  • Willingham v Morgan  73.Kan.1; XIV,37; 383 F2d 139 (CA 10 1967), vac and rem 395 US 402 (1968)
LOUISIANA
  • Clinton v CORE  (73.La.1), 63.11; IX,85—X,101; 9 RRLR 1131 (CA 5 1964), app dism'd 341 F2d 298 (CA 5 1965)
  • School Bd of Bogalusa v Bogalusa Voter's League  (73.La.a), 73.La.1, XI,14—XII,20
  • Jonesboro v Jackson, Reed, Bradford  73.La.2; XI,14
  • Louisiana v Amos  73.La.2a; XI,14—XIII,21
  • Louisiana v Potts, Saunders, Fenton, Lawrence  73.La.2b; XI,14
  • Louisiana v Evans, Davis  73.La.2c; XI,14
  • Whatley v Vidalia  73.La.3; XII,20—XIII,35; 399 F2d 521 (CA 5 1968)
  • Homer v Demonstrators  73.La.4; XII,20—XIII,35
  • In re Benjamin Smith, Esq  73.La.5; XIV,37
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Pratt, Farrell v Massachusetts  73.Mass.1; XII,20; cd 385 US 836 (1966)
MICHIGAN
  • Michigan v Barnard  (73.Mich.3), 55.Mich.3; X,140
  • Michigan v Altman  73.Mich.4; XIV,37; II ACQ 14
MISSISSIPPI
  • Mississippi v 25 Meridian Defs  (73.Miss.a), 55.81; IX,84—X,101
  • Brown v Meridian  (73.Miss.b), 55.Miss.3a; X,24; 356 F2d 602 (CA 5 1965)
  • Mays and Galloway v Mississippi  (73.Miss.c), 55.82; IX,84—X,101
  • Mississippi and Greenwood v Carmichael  (73.Miss.d), 55.83; IX,84—X,101
  • Greenwood v Peacock  (73.Miss.e), 55.83a, 55.Miss.5a; IX,85—XII,19; rev'd 384 US 808 (1966)
  • Drew, Mississippi v McNair  (73.Miss.f), 55.84, 55.Miss.6; IX,85—XI,70; 351 F2d 498 (CA 5 1965)
  • Lefton v Hattiesburg  (73.Miss.g), (372.o), 73.1; IX,43—X,24; 333 F2d 280 (CA 5 1964); MCLL
  • Mississippi v Brown  (73.Miss.h), 59.36; IX,85—X,25
  • Crawford, Mitchell, Poole, Salter v Mississippi  (73.Miss.i), 55.32, 55.Miss.2; X,24—XI,14
  • Mississippi v Hartfield  (73.Miss.j), 55.Miss.9a; X,137-XI,8; 363 F2d 869, 367 F2d 362 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Collins v Jackson  (73.Miss.k), 55.Miss.11; X,140—XI,14
  • Clarksdale v Gertge  (73.Miss.1), 51.Miss.5; X,140
  • Ashland v Beckley  73.Miss.2; XI,14
  • Mississippi v King  73.Miss.3; XI,14
  • Mississippi v Barber  73.Miss.4; XI,14
  • Mississippi v Raymond  73.Miss.5; XI,14
  • Greenville v Novick  73.Miss.6; XI,14—XII,20
  • Holly Springs v Walker  73.Miss.7; XI,14
  • Holly Springs v Jelinek, Harvey, Kuenzli  73.Miss.7a; XI,15
  • Indianola v Cableton  73.Miss.8; XI,15
  • Jackson v Catchings  73.Miss.9; XI,15—XII,20
  • Jackson v Klein  73.Miss.10; XI,15
  • Jackson v Sumrall  73.Miss.11; XI,15; MCLL
  • Mississippi v Archie  73.Miss.12; XI,15—XIII,36
  • Jackson v Alexander; Alexander v Cox  73.Miss.13; XI,15—XIV,37; 348 F2d 894 (CA 5 1965)
  • Jackson v Ross  73.Miss.15; XI,15
  • Mississippi v Allen  73.Miss.16; XI,15—XIII,22; 359 F2d 846 (CA 5 1965)
  • Meridian v Kaslo  73.Miss.17; XI,15; 360 F2d 282 (CA 5 1965)
  • Mississippi v Grandison  73.Miss.18; XI,15—XII,20
  • Mississippi v Bass, Karpe, Ramsland  73.Miss.18a; XI,15
  • Mississippi v Davis  73.Miss.19; XI,15—XII,20
  • Natchez v Day  73.Miss.19a; XI,15—XII,20
  • Natchez v Ladner, Easton  73.Miss.20; XI,16
  • Mississippi v Carver, Kemp  73.Miss.21; XI,16
  • Mississippi v Morgan Brown  73.Miss.22; XI,16
  • Mississippi v Gellatly  73.Miss.23; XI,16
  • Mississippi v Halprin  73.Miss.24; XI,16
  • Rutledge v Jackson  73.Miss.25; IX,70—XI,70; 367 F2d 362 (CA 5 1963); MCLL
  • Carmichael v Greenwood  73.Miss.26; XII,20; 352 F2d 86 (CA 5 1965), 369 F2d 698 (CA 5 1966)
  • Sunflower Co Colored Baptist Assoc v Trustees of Indianola School Dist  73.Miss.27; XIII,36; 369 F2d 795 (CA 5 1966)
NEW YORK
  • New York v Callender, Galamison  (73.NY.1), (51.NY.10), 51.56; IX,76—XI,4; 342 F2d 255 (CA 2), cd 380 US 977 (1965)
  • Hutchinson v New York  73.NY.2; XII,20,36; 86 SCt 5 (1965); MCLL
NORTH CAROLINA
  • North Carolina v Francis  (73.NC.1), 73.2; IX,84—X,101; 134 SE2d 681 (NC Sup Ct 1964)
  • North Carolina v Alston  (73.NC.2), 73.3; X,24; 227 FSupp 887 (MD NC 1964)
  • Hawkins v North Carolina  73.NC.3; XIII,36;365 F2d 559 (CA 4 1966), cd 385 US 949 (1966)
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Anderson v Chester  (73.Pa.1), 51.Pa.1; X,24,140; 347 F2d 823 (CA 3 1965), cd 384 US 1003 (1966)
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • South Carolina v Minter  73.SC.1; XI,16
  • South Carolina v Tracy  73.SC.2; XI,16
VIRGINIA
  • Baines v Danville; McGhee v Danville  (73.Va.a), 55.35; IX,84—X,101; 9 RRLR 1139 (CA 4 1964); MCLL
  • Wallace v Virginia  73.Va.1; XI,70—XIII,36; 357 F2d 105,107 (CA 4 1966), 384 US 891 (1966)
  • Virginia v Jones  73.Va.2; XIII,37; 367 F2d 154 (CA 4 1966)
  • Hirschkop v Virginia  73.Va.3; XIV,37; 166 SE2d 322 (Va Sup Ct of App 1969), cd 396 US 845 (1969)
74. In Obtaining Three-Judge Federal Courts
  • Schackman v Arnebergh  74.1; XIII,37; 258 FSupp 983 (CD Calif 1966), 387 US 427 (1967)
  • Moody v Flowers  74.2; XIII,37; 256 FSupp 195 (MD Ala 1966), vac and rem 387 US 97 (1967)
  • Nichols v Vance  74.3; XIV,37; 293 FSupp 680 (SD Tex 1968); MCLL
90. MISCELLANEOUS FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
  • Westlake Subdivision Improvement Assn v Klein  90.2; VI,82—IX,9
  • Estate of Robbins; Robbins v Mishkin  90.3; VII,105; 371 P2d 573 (Calif Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
  • California v Donaldson, May  90.4; XI,16
  • District of Columbia v Plummer  90.5; X,140—XI,70
  • Nick Cipy v Intl Bhd of Teamsters  90.6; XII, 21—XIV,38
  • New York v Lewis  90.7; XII,21—XIV,38
  • Chicago v Stewart  90.8; XII,21,37
  • Re Philip Moran  90.9; XIII,37
FREEDOM OF RELIGION (100-199)
110. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
111. In Education (and 24)
  • Illinois ex rel McCollum v Bd of Educ (School Dist #71, Champaign Co)  (111.a); 333 US 203 (1948); MCLL; ACLU
  • Carden v Bland  (111.b), 30.10; I,69; 288 SW2d 718 (Tenn Sup Ct 1956)
  • In re Application of Lewis and Klein v New York State Commr of Education  (111.c), 110.1; II,33—VI,55
  • Spalding v Wooley  (111.d), 110.2; II,51—VI,6; 309 SW2d 42 (Ky Ct of App 1957)
  • Rawlings v Butler  (111.1), 110.3; II,51; 290 SW2d 801 (Ky Ct of App 1956); ACLU
  • Squires v Augusta  (111.2), 110.4; II,51—V,48; 153 A2d 80 (Me Sup Ct 1959)
  • 64th Street Residence v New York City  (111.3), 110.5; III,23,68
  • School Dist of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v Schempp  (111.4), 111.6; III,69—IX,44; vac & rem 364 US 298 (1960); 195 FSupp 518 (ED Pa 1961), 374 US 203 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Baer v Kolmorgen, Bd of Educ, Ossining School Dist, No 1  (111.5), 110.7; IV,4, 42
  • Snyder v Newtown  (111.6), 110.9; V,3—VI,82; 161 A2d 770 (Conn Sup Ct 1960), app dism'd 365 US 299 (1961); MCLL
  • Resnick v Dade Co Bd of Pub Inst  (111.7), 110.10a; V,3—VII,105; 143 So2d 21 (Fla Sup Ct 1962)
  • Silver v New York State Educ Commr  (111.8), 110.11; V,23—VI,7
  • Perry v School Dist 81, Spokane  (111.9), 110.12; V,24; 344 P2d 1036 (Wash Sup Ct 1959)
  • Anderson v Swart  (111.10), 110.14; V,49—VII,6; 167 A2d 514 (Vt Sup Ct 1961), cd 366 US 925 (1961)
  • Washington State v Superior Court  (111.11), 110.15; V,75; 346 P2d 999 (Wash Sup Ct 1959), cd 363 US 814 (1960)
  • Dilger v School Dist  (111.12), 110.16; V,75; 352 P2d 564 (Ore Sup Ct 1960)
  • Pennsylvania v McCandless  (111.13), 110.18; VI,7
  • Cucuz v Lazarevich  (111.14), 110.21; VI,55
  • Matthews v Quinton  (111.15), 110.25; VII,6, 74; 362 P2d 932 (Sup Ct Alaska 1961), cd 368 US 517 (1962)
  • Lewis v NY Atty Genl Lefkowitz  (111.16), 110.26; VII,6,40
  • Lewis v Allen  (111.17), 111.1; X,101,140; 200 NE2d 767 (NY Ct of App 1964), cd 379 US 923 (1964)
  • Engel v Vitale  (111.18), 111.8; IV,69—VII, 105; 370 US 421 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Chamberlin v Dade Co Bd of Pub Inst  (111.19), 111.10; V,3—XI,16; 374 US 487 (1963); 377 US 402 (1964); 171 So2d 535 (Fla Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Carlson v Dickman  (111.20), 111.17; V,75—VIII,11; 366 P2d 533 (1961), cd 371 US 823 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Brown v Orange Co Bd of Pub Inst  (111.21), 111.20; VI,55—VIII,128; 128 So2d 181 (DCA Fla 1960), 155 So2d 371 (Fla Sup Ct 1963)
  • Murray v Curlett  111.22; VI,55—VIII,128; 179 A2d 698 (Md Sup Ct 1962), 374 US 203 (1963)
  • Polster v Centennial Jt School Bd (Bucks Co)  111.23; VII,74—X,140
  • Wisconsin ex rel Reynolds v Nusbaum  111.24; VII,105; 115 NW2d 761 (Wis Sup Ct 1962)
  • Re Five Pupils  111.26; VIII,128
  • Sills v Hawthorne Bd of Educ  111.27; IX,9—X,26; 200 A2d 615, 817 (NJ Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Prayer Rights for American Youth v NY Bd of Educ  111.28; IX,44
  • Balgooyen v Los Gatos Jt Union High School Dist  111.29; IX,86—XIII,38
  • Bd of Educ v Antone  111.30; X,26; 384 P2d 911 (Okla Sup Ct 1963)
  • Sheldon v Fannin  111.31; X,26; 214 FSupp 940 (DC Ariz 1962), app dism'd 372 US 228 (1963)
  • Ames v Bd of Educ (Santa Barbara)  111.32; X,101,140
  • Reed v Jenison Pub School Dist #30  111.33; X,101; 237 FSupp 48 (WD Mich 1965)
  • Stein v Oshinsky  111.34; X,101—XI,70; 348 F2d 999 (CA 2 1965), cd 382 US 957 (1965); ACLU
  • Horace Mann League v Tawes  111.35; X,101—XIII,38; 220 A2d 51 (CA Md 1966), cd 385 US 97 (1966)
  • Kolbeck v Kramer  111.36; XI,16; 202 A2d 889 (NJ Super Ct 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • McCartney v Bd of Educ  111.37; XI,16—XII,21
  • Holden v Bd of Educ  111.38, 111.47; XI,70—XII,21; 216 A2d 387 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • Stearns Co Bus Case  111.39; XII,21—XIII,38
  • Bd of Educ, Central School Dist No 1 v Allen, Rock  111.40; XII,21—XIV,38; 273 NYS2d 239, 276 NYS2d 234, 281 NYS2d 799 (NY Ct of App), aff'd 392 US 236 (1965); MCLL
  • Bowerman v O'Conner, Jr  111.41; XII,21—XIII,38
  • DeSpain v DeKalb  111.42; XII,21—XIV,38; 255 FSupp 655 (ND Ill 1966), 384 F2d 836 (CA 7 1967), cd 390 US 906 (1968)
  • Calvary Bible Presbyterian Church v U of Washington  111.43; XII,21—XIV,39; 436 P2d 189 (Wash Sup Ct 1967), cd 393 US 960 (1968)
  • Utevsky v Seattle School Bd  111.44; XII,21—XIII,39
  • O'Hare v Detroit Bd of Educ  111.45; XII,21—XIII,38; MCLL
  • Special Dist for Educ and Training of Handicapped Children of St Louis Co v Wheeler  111.45a; XIII,39
  • Alexander v Bartlett  111.46; XII,21—XIV,39
  • Spears v Honda  111.46a; XIII,39
  • Haverkamp v Page  111.46b; XIII,39
  • McCanna v Sills  111.46c; XIII,39
  • Fox, Jecker v Bd of Educ  111.46d; XIII,39
  • Honohan v Holt  111.46e; XIII,39
  • Taylor, Baker v Bd of Educ  111.46f; XIII,39
  • Rhoades v School Dist of Abington Township #65  111.46g; XIII,39
  • Worrell v Matters  111.46h; XIII,39; 226 A2d 53 (Pa Sup Ct), cd 389 US 846 (1967)
  • Eininger v School Dist of Philadelphia  111.46i; XIII,39
  • Flast v Cohen  111.48; XIII,39—XIV,39; 271 FSupp 1 (SD NY 1967), rev'd 392 US 83 (1968)
  • Polier v NYC Bd of Educ  111.48a; XIII,39—XIV,39
  • Protestants and Other Americans United for Separation of Church and State v US  111.48b; XIII,40—XIV,39; 266 FSupp 473 (SD Ohio 1967)
  • Smith v School Dist of Philadelphia  111.48c; XIII,40—XIV,39
  • Carpenter v Gardner  111.48d; XIII,40
  • Yurick v School Dist of Philadelphia  111.48e; XIII,40—XIV,39; MCLL
  • Clayton v Kervick  111.49; XIII,40—XIV,39; 52 NJ 138 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • Opinion of the Justices (New Hampshire)  111.50; XIII,40—XIV,39; 233 A2d 832 (NH Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Epperson v Arkansas  111.51; XIII,40—XIV,40; 416 SW2d 322 (Ark Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 393 US 97 (1968)
  • Southern v Tennessee  111.52; XIII,40
  • Hopkins, Goertz v McWilliams  111.54; XIII, 40
  • 2 Benedictine Sisters v Hopkins, Goertz  111.54a; XIII,40
  • ACLU v Albert Gallatin Area School Dist  111.55; XIV,40; 307 FSupp 637 (WD Penn 1969)
  • Garber v Kansas  111.56, 111.53; XIII,40—XIV,40; 419 P2d 896 (Kan Sup Ct 1966), cd 389 US 51 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Holt  111.57; XIV,40
  • Mettle v San Jose Unified School Dist  111.58; XIV,40
  • Tilton v Finch  111.59; XIV,40
  • Lynch v Grantham  111.60; XIV,40
  • California v Hensley  111.60a; XIV,40
  • New York v McCartney  111.61; XIV,40
  • Mann v Vermont Educ Bldgs Financing Agency  111.62; XIV,40; 247 A2d 68 (Vt Sup Ct 1968), dism'd 396 US 801 (1969)
112. In Public Places (and 13, 151, 152, 261)
  • Seversmith v Machiz  (112.a), 112.29; XI,16—XIII,41
  • Hughes v Priest, US Treasurer  (112.1), 30.6; I,52
  • Noe v Fedl Communications Comm  (112.2), 140.11; IV,43,91; 260 F2d 739 (CA DC 1958), cd 359 US 924 (1959)
  • Archer v Walker, Co Council of Montgomery Co  (112.3), 110.13; V,24—VI,7
  • Anderson v Redwood City  112.23; VI,82—VIII, 12
  • Rev Seebode v Hollinger  112.24; VII,74
  • Los Angeles Co and Hollywood Bowl Assn v Hollinger  112.24a; VII,105
  • Los Angeles and Bethlehem Star Parade Assn v Hollinger  112.25; VIII,73; MCLL
  • In re Jenison  112.26; IX,9.86; 120 NW2d 515 (Minn Sup Ct 1963), vac and rem 375 US 14 (1963); rev'd 125 NW2d 588 (Minn Sup Ct 1963)
  • Joseph v Hasbrouck Heights  112.27; X,102
  • Murray v Goldstein  112.28; XI,16—XIII,40; 216 A2d 897 (CA Md), cd 385 US 816 (1966)
  • Maryland v Schowgurow  112.29; XI,16,70; 213 A2d 475 (Md Ct of App 1965)
  • Maryland v Smith  112.29a; XI,70
  • Maryland v Anonymous Youth  112.30; XI,16
  • Estate of Supple  112.31; XI,70—XIII,41; MCLL
  • Protestants and Other Americans United for Separation of Church and State v O'Brien  112.32; XIII,41; 272 FSupp 712 (DC DC 1967); MCLL
  • Paul v Dade Co  112.33; XIII,41—XIV,40; 210 So2d 200 (Fla Sup Ct), 393 US 951 (1968)
  • Lowe v Eugene  112.34; XIII,41—XIV,41; 451 P2d 117 (Ore Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Lincoln v Page  112.35; XIII,41
  • Lazarus v Bd of Commrs  112.36; XIII,41
  • Reynolds School Dist #7 v Gardner  112.37; XIII,41
  • Aronow v US  112.38; XIV,41
  • Serbian Orthodox Church Congregation of St Demetrius of Akron v Kelemen  112.39; XIV,41; 256 NE2d 212 (Ohio Sup Ct), 393 US 527 (1969)
  • Maryland and Virginia Eldership of Churches of God v Church of God at Sharpsburg, Inc  112.40; XIV,41; aff'd 241 A2d 691 (Md Ct of App 1969), vac & rem 393 US 528 (1969); aff'd 254 A2d 162 (1969)
120. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO WAR (and 356, 362)
121. Application for CO Status-Pre-Induction (and 122, 125, 126, 127, 362)
  • Storey v US  121.47; XII,23,43
  • US v Gerald Wright  121.53; XIII,44; MCLL
  • US v Prince  121.56; XIII,44
  • US v Eldridge  121.57; XIII,44
  • Porter v US  121.58; XIII,44; 247 FSupp 602 (ND Ind), 260 FSupp 11, 314 F2d 833 (CA 7 1963); MCLL
  • US v Davis  121.59; 6th NDL 235:203; 279 FSupp 920 (DC Conn 1967)
  • US v Wentworth  121.61; 6th NDL 235:203; MCLL
121.100. PRE-1967 ACT CO APPLICATIONS
  • Simmons v US  (121.100a), 555.1; I,23; 348 US 397 (1955)
  • US v Glover  (121.100b), 120.17; V,76—VII,40; 286 F2d 84 (CA 8 1961)
  • Sicurella v US  (121.100c); 213 F2d 911 (CA 7), rev'd 348 US 385 (1955)
  • Gonzales v US  (121.100d); 120 FSupp 720 (ED Mich), 212 F2d 71 (CA 6), rev'd 348 US 407 (1955)
  • Witmer v US  (121.100e); 115 FSupp 19 (MD Penn), 213 F2d 95 (CA 3), aff'd 348 US 375 (1955)
  • Dickinson v US  (121.100f); 203 F2d 336 (CA 9), rev'd 346 US 389 (1953)
  • US v Purvis  121.101; 6th NDL 235:204; 1 SSLR 3228 (CA 2 1968)
  • US v Haughton  121.103; XIV,44; 6th NDL 235: 204; 290 FSupp 422 (WD Wash 1968), rev'd 413 F2d 736 (CA 9 1969); MCLL
  • US v Rodman  121.104; 6th NDL 235:204; 1 SSLR 3275 (WD Tenn 1968)
121.200. PROBLEM OF ELEMENTS
  • US v Carroll  121.201; 6th NDL 235:204; 1 SSLR 3168 (CA 3 1968)
  • Miller v US  121.202; 5th NDL 235:204; 388 F2d 973 (CA 9 1967); MCLL
  • Mulloy v US  (121.203); XIV, 44; 6th NDL 235:206; I ACQ 46; 3 SSLR 3011 (WD Ky 1968), 412 F2d 421 (CA 6 1969); MCLL
121.250. I-O/I-A-O
  • Chaney v US  121.251; 6th NDL 235:204; aff'd 1 SSLR 3337 (CA 5 1969)
  • US v Carson  121.252; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3046 (ED Ark 1968)
  • US v Washington  121.253; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3008 (CA 6 1968); MCLL
121.275. RELIGIOUS BELIEF
  • US v Horst  (121.275a), 120.4; III,3,23
  • US v Van Hook  (121.275b), 120.25; VII,40; 284 F2d 489 (CA 7 1960), rev'd and rem 365 US 609 (1961)
  • US v Harshman  (121.275c), 121.26; VII,40—VIII,128; 307 F2d 590 (CA 7 1962), 372 US 607 (1962)
  • US v Parker  (121.275d), 121.27; VII,40—VIII,96; 307 F2d 585 (CA 7 1962), 372 US 608 (1962)
  • US v N J Harshman  (121.275e), 121.28; VII,106—IX,44
  • US v Stolberg  (121.275f), 121.30; IX,9—XI,71; 346 F2d 363 (CA 7 1965)
  • US v Peter  (121.275g), 121.31; IX,10—X,140; 324 F2d 173 (CA 9 1963), 380 US 163 (1965)
  • US v Seeger  (121.275h), 121.32; IX,44—XII,22; 4th NDL 235:202; 216 FSupp 516 (SD NY 1963), 326 F2d 846 (CA 2 1964), 380 US 163 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Jakobson  (121.275i), 121.33; IX,86—X,140; 325 F2d 409 (CA 2 1963), 380 US 163 (1965)
  • US v MacMurray  (121.275j), 121.34; IX,86; 330 F2d 928 (CA 9 1964)
  • US v O'Neal  (121.275k), 121.35; X,102—XI,17; MCLL
  • US v Etcheverry  (121.275L), 121.38; X,102—XI,17; 320 F2d 873 (CA 9 1963), cd 375 US 930 (1963); MCLL
  • US v Fleming  (121.275m), 121.39; X,102—XI,17; 344 F2d 912 (CA 10 1965)
  • In re Paul Smith  (121.275n), 121.42; XI,73
  • US v Spiro  (121.275o), 121.51; XII,23—XIV,43; 6th NDL 235:203; 384 F2d 159 (CA 3 1967), cd 390 US 956 (1968); MCLL
  • In re X  (121.275p), 121.52; XIII,44; MCLL
  • McFadden v Selective Service System Bd #40  (121.275q), 127.17; 6th NDL 235:218; I ACQ 18; 309 FSupp 502 (ND Cal 1970)
  • Welsh v US  (121.275r), 121.102; XIV,43; 6th NDL 235:204; 2 ACQ 26; 404 F2d 1078 (CA 9 1968); MCLL
  • US v Sisson  (121.275s), 121.203; XIV,44; 6th NDL 235:204; I ACQ 22; 294 FSupp 511,515 (DC Mass 1968), 294 FSupp 520 (DC Mass 1968), 297 FSupp 902 (DC Mass 1969), 399 US 267 (1970); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Shacter  121.276; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3272 (D MD 1968); MCLL
  • US v St Clair  121.277; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3224 (ED NY 1968)
121.300. EXHAUSTION RULE
  • Lockhart v US  121.301; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3204 (CA 9 1968); MCLL
  • US v Brooks  121.302; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3066 (MD Tenn 1968), 415 F2d 502 (CA 6 1969)
  • Vaughn v US  121.303; 6th NDL 235:205; 1 SSLR 3277 (CA 8 1968)
121.400. CO SOUGHT AFTER RECEIVING INDUCTION ORDER
  • US v Vick  (121.400b), 121.40; XI,17
  • US v Lang  (121.400c), 121.41; XI,17,73
  • US v Gearey  (121.400d), 121.44; XII,22—XIII,43; 4th NDL 235:203; 260 FSupp 7 (SD NY 1966), vac and rem 368 F2d 144 (CA 2 1966); 266 FSupp 161 (SD NY 1967), aff'd 379 F2d 915 (CA 2 1967), cd 389 US 959 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Fargas  (121.400e), 121.46; XII,22—XIII,43; 267 FSupp 452 (SD NY 1967); MCLL
  • US v Stafford  121.401; 6th NDL 235:205; 389 F2d 215 (CA 2 1968)
  • US v Blaisdell  121.402; 6th NDL 235:203; 1 SSLR 3143 (D Me 1968), 294 FSupp 1303 (DC Maine 1968)
  • US v Skinner  121.403; 6th NDL 235:206; 1 SSLR 3042 (DC NH 1968)
  • Dugdale v US  121.404; 6th NDL 235:206; aff'd 389 F2d 482 (CA 9 1968)
  • Boswell v US  121.405; 6th NDL 235:206; 390 F2d 181 (CA 9 1968)
  • Hoapili v US  121.406; 6th NDL 235:206; 395 F2d 656 (CA 9 1968), cd 395 US 930 (1969)
  • Weersing v US  121.407; 6th NDL 235:206; cd 396 US 987 (1969); MCLL
  • US v Davis  121.408; 6th NDL 235:206; 284 F Supp 93 (SD Iowa 1968), rev'd 410 F2d 89 (CA 8 1969)
  • US v Baker  121.409; 6th NDL 235:206; 1 SSLR 3017 (ED NY 1968); MCLL
  • Lurie v US  121.410; 6th NDL 235:206; rev'd 402 F2d 297 (CA 5 1968)
  • US v Bornemann  121.411; I ACQ 41; 298 FSupp 1253 (DC Conn 1969), rem 424 F2d 1343 (CA 2 1970); MCLL
121.500. CO SOUGHT AFTER REFUSING INDUCTION
  • US v Kurki  (121.500a), 123.46; XI,72—XII,24; 255 FSupp 161 (ED Wisc 1966), 384 F2d 905 (CA 7), cd 390 US 926 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Federspiel  121.501; 6th NDL 235:206; 1 SSLR 3042 (ND Ohio 1968)
  • Palmer v US  121.502; 6th NDL 235:206; 1 SSLR 3190 (CA 9 1968)
  • US v McNeal  121.503; 6th NDL 235:206; 1 SSLR 3227 (ND Calif 1968); MCLL
  • US v Hinch  121.504; 6th NDL 235:206; 1 SSLR 3274 (WD Mo 1968)
  • US v Fetrow  (121.505), 121.55; XIII,44
121.900. MISCELLANEOUS
  • Nickerson v US  121.901; 6th NDL 235:206; 391 F2d 760 (CA 10), cd 392 US 907 (1968)
  • US v Morico  121.903; I ACQ 30; 415 F2d 138 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
122. Application for CO Status-After Induction (and 124, 356)
  • Re David Ovall  122.50; XI,17
  • Re Joseph Brennan  122.51; XI,17
  • Re Martin Mayfield  122.52; XI,17
  • In re Kanewske  122.53, 125.6; XII,25; 260 FSupp 521 (ND Calif 1966), dism'd 383 F2d 389 (CA 9 1967); MCLL
  • Re Gary A Allen  122.54; XII,23
  • Re Raymond Crane  122.55; XII,23
  • Re George Louden  122.56; XII,23
  • Re James M Taylor  122.57; XII,23—XIII,44
  • Re John A Hills  122.58; XII,23
  • Re Cp1 John Morgan  122.59; XII,23—XIII,45
  • In re Paul Denison  122.60; XIII,45
  • Pvt Chavez v Fergusson  122.61; XIII,45; 266 FSupp 879 (DC Calif 1967), dism'd 395 F2d 215 (CA 9 1968)
  • Re Gary Gagner  122.62; XIII,45
  • US v Brown, Gilliam  122.63; XIII,45; MCLL
  • David Brown v McNamara  122.64; XIII,45; 263 FSupp 686 (DC NJ 1967), aff'd 387 F2d 150 (CA 3 1967), cd 390 US 1005 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • US ex rel Christensen v US Navy  122.65; XIII,45
  • Gillen v McNamara  122.66; XIII,45; MCLL
  • Re Jo Harry Muir  122.68; XIII,45; MCLL
  • Noyd v McNamara  122.69; XIII,46—XIV,45; 6th NDL 235:207; I ACQ 30; 267 FSupp 701 (DC Colo 1967), 378 F2d 538 (CA 10), cd 389 US 1022 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Noyd v Bond  122.69a; XIV,45; 6th NDL 235: 207; 285 FSupp 785 (DC NMex), 402 F2d 441 (CA 10), 395 US 683 (1969); MCLL
  • US v Lindsay  122.70; XIII,46
  • Re William Hayes  122.71; XIII,46; MCLL
  • In re Crane  (122.71a); 6th NDL 235:207
  • US v Bash  122.72; XIII,46; MCLL
  • Gann v Wilson  (122.72a), 122.72; 6th NDL 235:207; 289 FSupp 191 (ND Calif 1968)
  • Cooper v Barker  122.73; 5th NDL 235:207; 1 SSLR 3289 (DC Md 1968)
  • US v Sigmon  122.74; 6th NDL 235:207; 1 SSLR 3054 (CM Army Bd of Rev 1968)
  • In the Matter of Bezouska  122.75; 6th NDL 235:207; 1 SSLR 3163 (AF Bd for Correction of Military Records 1968)
  • Minasian v Engel  122.76; 6th NDL 235:207; 1 SSLR 3173 (CA 9 1968)
122.200. CO DISCHARGE FROM RESERVES
  • US ex rel Cary v Commanding Officer  122.201; XIII,46
  • US v Romero  (122.201a), 122.67; XIII,45
  • Re Charles Bricker  122.202; XIII,46
  • Craycroft v Ferrall  122.203; XIII,46—XIV,45; 6th NDL 235:208; 408 F2d 587 (CA 9 1969); MCLL
  • Muller v Ignatius  122.204; XIII,47; MCLL
  • Gion v McNamara  122.206; 6th NDL 235:208; MCLL
  • Hammond v Lenfest  122.207; 6th NDL 235:208; 1 SSLR 3108 (CA 2 1968); MCLL
  • US ex rel Mankiewicz v Ray  122.208; 5th NDL 235:208; 1 SSLR 3160 (CA 2 1968)
  • US ex rel O'Hare v Eichstaedt  122.209; 6th NDL 235:208; 285 FSupp 476 (ND Calif 1967)
  • Mader v Clifford  122.210; 6th NDL 235:208; 1 SSLR 3185 (ND Calif 1968)
  • Schultz v Clifford  122.211; 6th NDL 235:208; 1 SSLR 3256 (D Minn 1968)
122.300. EXHAUSTION RULE
  • US ex rel Brooks Clifford  (122.300a), 122. 205; 6th NDL 235:208; MCLL
  • Quinn v Laird  122.301; XIV,45; 6th NDL 235: 208,209
123. Through Nonregistration, Noncooperation Before/At Induction
  • US v Jack Smith  (123.35), 122.30; VIII,12
  • US v Hoertkorn  (123.36), 122.31; IX,86
  • US v Goddard  (123.37), 122.35; X,102—XI,73
  • US v Irons  (123.a), 122.37; X,102,141
  • Re Michael Yankee  (123.39), 125.3; XI,18
  • US v Lapp  123.40; XI,18; MCLL
  • US v Wm Cunningham  123.41; XI,18
  • US v Gustavson  123.42; XI,18,72
  • US v Beardall  123.43; XI,72
  • US v Bassin  123.44; XI,18,72
  • US v Lawrence  123.47; XI,72
  • US v Dowonis  123.49; XI,72
  • US v Moore  123.50; XI,72
  • US v Grant  123.51; XI,72
  • US v Jalbert  123.52; XI,72; MCLL
  • US v Walsh  123.53; XI,72
  • US v Biesiada  123.54; XI,72
  • US v Rodd  123.56; XI,72—XII,24
  • US v Hodgkin  (123.57), 121.50; XII,23
  • Oakland v Callison  123.87; XIII,48
  • US v Leong  123.88; XIII,48; MCLL
  • Leong v Wood  123.88a; XIII,48; MCLL
  • US v Penney  123.89; 6th NDL 235:209
123.100. REFUSAL TO REGISTER
  • US v Eichel  (123.100a), 120.1; II,33,51
  • US v Rodd  (123.100b), 122.36; X,102,141
  • US v Dickenson  (123.100c), 123.64; XII,24
  • US v Grundy  (123.100d), 123.65; XII,24
  • US v Harker  123.101; 6th NDL 235:209; 1 SSLR 3181 (D Md 1968)
  • US v Toussie  123.102; 6th NDL 235:209; 280 FSupp 473 (ED NY 1967)
123.200. REFUSAL TO REPORT FOR PHYSICAL
  • US v Trench  (123.200a), 120.29; VII,40
  • US v Gee  (123.200b), 122.33; X,102
  • US v Pence  123.201; 6th NDL 235:209; 287 FSupp 598 (DC Minn 1968); MCLL
123.300. REFUSAL TO CARRY DRAFT CARD
  • US v Weeks  (123.300a), 122.32; X,102—XII,24
  • US v Switzer  (123.300b), 122.34; X,102
  • US v Miller  (123.300c), 124.30; XI,73—XIII,47; 249 FSupp 59 (SD NY 1965), 367 F2d 72 (CA 2 1966), aff'd 386 US 911 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Steven Smith  (123.300d), 124.31; XI,18—XII,24
  • US v Witkowski  (123.300e), 123.78, 124.32; XI,73—XIII,47
  • US v Wilson  (123.300f), 123.79, 124.33; XI, 73—XIII,47
  • US v Cornell, Edelman, Lisker  (123.300g), 123.80, 124.34; XI,73—XIII,47; aff'd 384 F2d 115 (CA 2 1967), cd 392 US 904 (1968)
  • US v O'Brien  123.301, 123.81, 124.40; XIII,48—XIV,46; 6th NDL 235:209; 376 F2d 538 (CA 1 1967), rev'd 391 US 367 (1968)
  • US v Bonito, Thomas  (123.301a), 123.83; XIII,48
  • US v Kiger, Baehler  (123.301b), 123.84; XIII,48
  • US v Rader  (123.301c), 123.85; XIII,48
  • US v Solomonow  (123.301d), 123.86; XIII,48
  • US v Gutknecht  123.302; XIV,46; 6th NDL 235: 209; 283 FSupp 945 (DC Minn), aff'd 406 F2d 494 (CA 8 1969)
123.400. LOCAL BOARD MUST ISSUE ORDER TO REPORT
  • Brede v US  123.401; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3243 (CA 9 1968); MCLL
  • US v Sloan  123.402; 6th NDL 235:210; MCLL
  • Cupit v US  123.403; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3244 (WD Wisc 1968); MCLL
  • US v Crowley  123.404; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3341 (CA 4 1968), cd 394 US 904 (1969); MCLL
123.500. ORDER OF CALL
  • US v Lybrand  123.501; 6th NDL 235:210; 279 FSupp 74 (ED NY 1967); MCLL
  • US v Smith  (123.501a), 123.405; 1 SSLR 3146 (ND Calif 1968)
  • Fore v US  123.502; 6th NDL 235:210; 395 F2d 548 (CA 10 1962); MCLL
  • US v Sandbank  123.503; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3238 (CA 2 1968), cd 394 US 961 (1969); MCLL
  • US v Lott  123.504; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3244 (CD Calif 1968), cd 392 US 936 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Garcia Miranda  123.505; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3249 (DC PR 1968); MCLL
  • Yates v US  123.506; 6th NDL 235:210; 1 SSLR 3302 (CA 1 1968), cd 395 US 925 (1969); MCLL
123.600. I-O REFUSAL TO REPORT FOR CIVILIAN WORK
  • US v Miller  (123.600a), 120.15; V,49
  • Gallegos, Johnson, Taylor v US  (123.600b), 120.18; VI,8; 295 F2d 879 (CA 9), cd 368 US 988 (1962)
  • Mang v Pasadena Draft Bd No 91  (123.600c), 121.29; IX,9—X,26; 339 F2d 369 (CA 9 1964)
  • US v Mang  (123.600cc), 121.29a; X,102
  • US v Lawson  (123.600d), 121.37; X,102,140; 337 F2d 800 (1964), cd 380 US 919 (1965)
  • US v Daniels  (123.600e), 123.71; XIII,47; 372 F2d 407, 404 F2d 1049 (CA 9 1968)
  • US v Dundas  (123.600f), 123.72; XIII,47
  • Martinetto v US  123.601; 6th NDL 235:210; 391 F2d 346 (1968)
  • Owens v US  123.602; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3130 (CA 10 1968), cd 393 US 934 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Rotella  123.603; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3245 (ED NY 1968); MCLL
  • US v Dicks  123.604; 6th NDL 235:211; 392 F2d 524 (CA 4 1966)
  • Smith v US  123.605; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3007 (CA 8 1968); MCLL
  • US v Wymer  123.606; 6th NDL 235:211; 284 FSupp 100 (SD Iowa 1968)
  • Petrie v US  123.607; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3104 (1969), vac 407 F2d 267 (CA 9 1969); MCLL
123.650. IV-D v I-O CLASSIFICATION
  • US v Nazaroff  (123.650a), 120.16; V,76
  • US v Pitt  (123.650b), 123.73; XIII,47; 420 F2d 1028 (US Ct of Claims 1970)
  • US v Tucker  (123.650c), 123.74; XIII,47; 374 F2d 731 (CA 7 1967)
  • US v Chas A Jackson  (123.650d), 123.76; XIII,47; 369 F2d 936 (CA 4 1962)
  • Magee v US  123.651; 6th NDL 235:211; 392 F2d 187 (CA 1 1968); MCLL
  • McCoy v US  123.652; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3251 (CA 5 1968); MCLL
  • US v Tichenor  123.653; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3250 (CA 6 1968)
  • US v Simms  123.654; 6th NDL 235:211; 285 FSupp 981 (D Del 1968); MCLL
  • US v Hull  123.655; 6th NDL 235:211; 391 F2d 257 (CA 4), cd 392 US 914 (1968)
  • Robertson v US  123.656; 6th NDL 235:211; 404 F2d 1141 (CA 5 1968), rev'd 417 F2d 440 (1969); MCLL
123.700. FAILURE TO EXHAUST SSS REMEDIES
  • US v Dyer  123.701; 6th NDL 235:211; 272 FSupp 965 (ND WVa 1967), aff'd 390 F2d 611 (CA 4 1968); MCLL
  • Langhorne v US  123.702; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3065 (CA 9 1968)
  • US v McKart  123.703; XIV,46; 6th NDL 235:212; 395 F2d 906, rev'd 395 US 185 (1969)
123.800. ORDERS TO REPORT FOR DELINQUENCY
  • Wills v US  (123.800a), 123.82; XIII,48; 384 F2d 943 (CA 9 1967), cd 392 US 908 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Eisdorfer  123.801; 6th NDL 235:211; 1 SSLR 3115 (ED NY 1968); MCLL
124. Challenges to Military Orders (and 122, 356)
  • US Army v Steinke  (124.34), 123.29; X,141
  • Re Jack Gorman  (124.35), 125.4; XI,18
  • Re Larry Bobbitt  (124.36), 125.5; XI,18
  • Re Bert Kanewski  (124.37), 125.6; XI,18; MCLL
  • Re Michael Fram  (124.38), 125.7; XI,19
  • Re Roger Newby  (124.39), 125.8; XI,19—XII,25
  • In re Curran  (124.40), 125.9; XI,73
  • US v Howe  124.41, 125.12; XI,73—XIII,48; 6th NDL 235:212
  • Howe v Clifford  124.41a; 6th NDL 235:212
  • Calello, Dwyer, Fisher v Resor; Baldouf v Nitze; Borden v McNamara, Nitze  124.42, 125.13; XI,73—XIII,49
  • Capt Curtis Johnson v US  124.43; XIII,49
  • Re Clemens G Brysky  124.44; XIII,49
  • US v Stapp  124.45; XIII,49
  • US v Ilg  124.45a; XIII,49
  • US v Petrick  124.46; XIII,49
  • Townsend v Capt Greiczed  124.47; XIII,49
  • US v Daniels; US v Harvey  124.50; 6th NDL 235:212; MCLL
  • US v Sood and 26 Others  124.51; 6th NDL 235:213; I ACQ 37
124.100. BY MEMBERS OF RESERVES, NAT'L GUARD
  • Winters v US  124.101; XIV,46; 6th NDL 235:213; 281 FSupp 289 (ED NY), 390 F2d 879 (CA 2), 89 SCt 34 (1968), 89 SCt 57 (1968), cd 393 US 896 (1968)
  • In re Smith v Ritchey  124.102; XIV, 47; 6th NDL 235:213; 393 US 75 (1968)
  • Johnson v Powell  124.104; XIV,47; 393 US 920 (1968)
  • McArthur v Clifford  124.105; XIV,47; 6th NDL 235:213; 402 F2d 58 (CA 4), cd 393 US 1002 (1968)
  • Drifka and Allen v Brainard  124.106; XIV, 47; 6th NDL 235:213; 393 US 231 (1968)
125. By Members of Minority Groups and Aliens (and 121)
  • US v Surls  (125.a), 120.3; III,3,47
  • Re Orville Cupp  (125.b), 120.5; III,23,24
  • US v Mohammed  (125.c), 121.28; VII,40,106; 288 F2d 236 (CA 7 1961), cd 368 US 820 (1961)
  • Re Winstel Belton  125.1; XI,18
  • Re Jackson, Brown, Clark, Green  125.2; XI,18
  • US v Griffin  (125.3), 123.48; XI,72
  • US v Alvelo  (125.4), 123.58; XI,72—XII,24
  • US v Arocho  (125.5), 123.59, 125.32; XI,72—XIII,50
  • US v Taylor  125.10; XI,73
  • In re James Gilbert  125.11; XI,73
  • Pvt Adam Weber  125.15; XII,25
  • DuVernay v US  125.19, 123.61; XII,24—XIV,47; 6th NDL 235:214; 394 F2d 979 (CA 5), aff'd 394 US 309 (1969)
  • Nunnally v Selective Service System  (125.20), 123.62; XII,24—XIII,49
  • Richmond and Von Key v Commanding Officer  125.21; XIII,49; 12 RRLR 19 (CD Cal 1966)
  • US v Richmond, Von Key  125.21a, 123.63; XII,24—XIII,49
  • US v Reeves  125.22; XIII,50
  • Re Pvt William Johnson  125.23; XIII,50
  • US v Sumrall  125.24; XIII,50—XIV,47; 6th NDL 235:214; 397 F2d 924 (CA 5 1968), cd 393 US 991 (1968)
  • Sumrall v Kidd  125.24a; XIII,50—XIV,48; 394 US 215 (1968)
  • US v Schutz  125.26; XIII,50; 6th NDL 235:209
  • Oakland (Calif), v Penney  125.27; XIII,50
  • Ali aka Clay v Gordon, J  125.28; XIII,50—XIV,48; 386 US 1002 (1967), cd 386 US 1018 (1967)
  • US v Clay aka Ali  125.28a; XIII,50—XIV,48; 397 F2d 901 (CA 6), 89 SCt 1163 (1969)
  • US v Davis  125.29; XIII,50; 374 F2d 1 (CA 5 1967)
  • US v Johnnie Williams  125.31; XIII,50
  • Boyd v Clark  125.33; XIII,50—XIV,48; 287 FSupp 561 (SD NY 1967), 393 US 316 (1969)
  • Richard Williams v US  125.34; XIII,50, 51; aff'd 1 SSLR 3346 (CA 9 1969)
  • Evers v Williams  125.36; 6th NDL 235:215; MCLL
  • Brooks v Local Bd 20; US v Brooks  125.37; 6th NDL 235:215
  • Nelloms v US  (125.38), 125.30; XIII,50; 6th NDL 235:215; 399 F2d 295 (CA 5 1968), cd 393 US 1071 (1969)
126. Based on US Constitution, Treaties and Agreements, Nurnberg Judgment (and 121, 123, 128)
  • US v Mitchell  (126.1), 126.11, 123.38; XI,17—XIII,52; 354 F2d 767 (CA 2 1966), 369 F2d 323, cd 386 US 972 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Weatherall  (126.2), 123.39; XI,18—XII,24
  • US v Maracle  (126.3), 123.45; XI,18,72
  • Luftig v McNamara  126.4; XI,74—XIII,51; 373 F2d 664 (CA DC 1967), cd 387 US 945 (1967)
  • Re Smith and McClure  126.5; XI,74—XII,26
  • Katz v Johnson  (126.6), 123.55; XI,72
  • US v Butler  (126.7), 127.6, 123.57; XI,72—XIV,51; 6th NDL 235:217; 389 F2d 172 (CA 6), cd 390 US 1039 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Conklin  126.12; XII,24—XIII,52; 291 FSupp 461 (SD NY 1968); MCLL
  • Mora, Johnson, Samas v McNamara, Resor  126.13; XII,25—XIII,52; cd 389 US 934 (1967); MCLL
  • Levy v Corcoran  126.14; XIII,52—XIV,49; 6th NDL 235:215; 128 US App DC 388 (DC DC 1967), 389 F2d 929 (CA DC 1967), cd 389 US 960 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Levy  126.14a; XIII,52—XIV,49; 6th NDL 235:215; MCLL
  • Levy v Resor  126.14b; XIII,53—XIV,49; 6th NDL 235:216; 17 USCMA 135, 384 F2d 689 (CA 4 1967), cd 389 US 1049 (1968); MCLL
  • Re Levy  126.14c; XIV,49; 6th NDL 235:216; 286 FSupp 593 (DC Kan 1968), 415 F2d 1263 (CA 10 1969); MCLL
  • Levy v Parker, Resor  126.14d; XIV,49; 6th NDL 235:216; 384 F2d 689 (CA 4), cd 389 US 1049 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Oguendo  126.15; XIII,53; cd 393 US 896 (1968); MCLL
  • Holmes v US; Hart v US  126.16; XIV, 49, 50; 6th NDL 235:216; 387 F2d 781 (CA 7), cd 391 US 936 (1968); 382 F2d 1020 (CA 3), cd 391 US 956 (1968)
  • US v James St Clair  126.17; 6th NDL 235:216; 1 SSLR 3184 (SD NY 1968); MCLL
  • Fisher v US  126.18; 6th NDL 235:216; rev'd 413 F2d 1034 (CA 9 1969)
  • US v David Harris  126.19; I ACQ 34; 412 F2d 384 (CA 9 1969)
  • US v Zimmerman  126.20; I ACQ 38
127. Civil and Criminal Judicial Action on SSS Regulations, Orders, Induction (and 121, 362)
  • Re Smokler, 5 Others  (127.1), 124.37b; XII, 25; MCLL
  • Del Bourgo v Mansfield  (127.2), 121.45; XII, 22—XIV,50; 6th NDL 235:217; 300 FSupp 500 (ND Cal 1967), 300 FSupp 502 (ND Cal 1968); MCLL
  • Pavloff v Local Bd #57  127.3; XIII,53; MCLL
  • Strieter v McIssac  127.4; XIII,53; MCLL
  • Petersen v Clark  127.5; XII,53—XIV,50; 6th NDL 235:217; 285 FSupp 700 (ND Cal 1968); MCLL
  • In re Shapiro  127.7; XIII,54; MCLL
  • Donald Fass v Selective Service System  127.8; XIII,54; MCLL
  • Katz v Tyler  127.9; XIII,54; cd 386 US 942 (1967)
  • Price v Kuenan  127.10; XIII,54; MCLL
  • US v O'Connor  127.11; XIII,54; I ACQ 26; MCLL; ACLU
  • Stashuk v Clark  127.12; XIII,54; MCLL
  • Oestereich v SSS Local Bd #11  127.13; XIV, 51; 280 FSupp 78 (DC Wyo), 390 F2d 100 (CA 10), rev'd and rem 393 US 233 (1968); MCLL
  • Clark v Gabriel  127.14; XIV,51; 6th NDL 235: 217; 287 FSupp 369 (ND Cal), 393 US 256 (1968); MCLL
  • Faulkner v Clifford  127.15; 6th NDL 235:218; 289 FSupp 895 (ED NY 1968), 393 US 1046 (1969); MCLL
  • Rheingans v Clark  127.16; 6th NDL 235:218; MCLL
  • Schmidt v SS Bd No 13  127.18; 6th NDL 235: 218; MCLL
  • Whitehorn v Melehan; Whitehorn v Poole; US v Whitehorn  127.19; 6th NDL 235;218; MCLL
127.100. CHALLENGES TO PUNITIVE PECLASSIFICATION
  • Wolff and Shortt v Selective Service Local Bds 16, 66  (127.100a), 127.100, 124.37a; XII,25—XIII,55; 6th NDL 235:218; rev'd and rem 372 F2d 817 (CA 2 1967); MCLL
  • Natl Student Assn v Hershey  127.101; XIII,55—XIV,51; 6th NDL 235:218; rev'd and rem 412 F2d 1103 (CA DC 1969); MCLL
  • Anderson v Hershey, Michigan SSS Director, and SSS Local Bds  127.102; XIII,55; MCLL
  • Peffers v SSS Washington Appeal Bd and Local Bds  127.103; XIII,55; MCLL
  • Huey v SSS Local Bd 22  127.104; XIII,55; MCLL
  • Kimball v SSS Local Bd 15  127.105; XIII,55; MCLL
  • Rev Bucher v SSS Local Bd 7  127.106; XIII,55; MCLL
  • Breen v SS Local Bd #16  127.107; XIV,52; 6th NDL 235:219; 284 FSupp 749 (DC Conn), 406 F2d 636 (CA 2), rev'd 396 US 460 (1970); MCLL
  • Turley v SSS  127.108; 6th NDL 235:219; 301 FSupp 845 (CD Cal 1968); MCLL
  • Gresser v SSS  127.109; 6th NDL 235:219; 1 SSLR 3267 (DC NJ 1968)
  • Kolden v SSS Bd No 4  127.110; 6th NDL 235:219; 406 F2d 631 (CA 8 1969); MCLL
  • Shiffman v SS Local Bd No 5  127.111; XIV,52;391 US 930 (1968)
127.200. CHALLENGES TO LOSS OF STUDENT DEFERMENTS
  • Carey v Local Bd No 2  127.201; 6th NDL 235:219; 1 SSLR 3326 (DC Conn 1969)
  • Armendariz v Hershey  127.202; 5th NDL 235:219; 295 FSupp 1351 (WD Tex), 413 F2d 1006 (CA 5 1969)
  • Schafer v Mitchell  127.203; 6th NDL 235:200
128. By Civilians (and 50-59)
  • US v Eugene Debs  (128.aa); 249 US 211 (1919)
  • US v McCrackin  (128.a), 120.10; IV,42,70
  • US v Robinson  (128.b), 120.13; V,49
  • US v Rev Muste  (128.c), 120.14; V,49—VI,82; MCLL
  • US v Gormley  (128.d), 123.23; VII,106—VIII,73; MCLL
  • US v Dr Evans  (128.e), 123.28; IX,10
  • Eminente v Johnson, McNamara, Rusk  (128.f), 126.1; X,19—XIII,51; 361 F2d 73 (CA DC), cd 385 US 929 (1966); MCLL
  • Orr v US, Crown Pt (Ind) Draft Bd  (128.g), 126.3; XI,19
  • Autenrieth v Cullen  128.1, 124.35; XI,73—XIII,56; 6th NDL 235:220; 279 FSupp 156 (ND Cal 1968), 418 F2d 586 (CA 9 1969); MCLL
  • Citizens v United Technology Center  (128.2), 126.7; XI,74
  • Farley v Healey  128.3; XIII,56; 431 P2d 650 (Calif Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • US v Weissman, Martin  128.4; XIII,56
  • US v Spock  128.5; XIV,52; 6th NDL 235:220;416 F2d 165 (CA 1 1969); MCLL
  • US v Berrigan  128.6; 6th NDL 235:220; 383 FSupp 336 (DC Md 1968); MCLL
  • US v Rev Cunnane (Milwaukee 14)  128.7; 6th NDL 235:220
129. Miscellaneous (including Expatriation)
  • Hanauer v Elkins, Pres, U of Maryland  (129.a), 120.2; II,66—IV,90; 141 A2d 903 (Md Ct of App 1958), cd 358 US 643 (1959)
  • US v 31 Youths and Fathers  (129.b), 126.8; XI,74
  • US v 3 Salesmen and 2 National Guardsmen  (129.c), 126.9; XI,74
  • US v Garach  (129.1), 125.35; XIII,51; MCLL
  • Re James C Young  129.2; 6th NDL 235:220; MCLL
130. DENIAL OF TAX EXEMPTION TO INSTITUTIONS (and 202, 266)
  • First Unitarian Church v Los Angeles Co  130.1; II,3—VI,42; 357 US 545 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • First Methodist Church of San Leandro v Horstmann  130.2; II,3—III,69; 311 P2d 540 (Calif Sup Ct 1957)
  • First Unitarian Church of Berkeley v Horstmann  130.3; II,3—III,69; 311 P2d 540 (Calif Sup Ct 1957)
  • American Unitarian Assn v Santa Clara  130.4; II,3
  • Fellowship of Humanity v Alameda and Oakland  130.5; II,3—III,24; 315 P2d 394 (Calif DCA 1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Washington Ethical Society v District of Columbia  130.6; II,51—III,47; 249 F2d 127 (CA DC 1957); ACLU
  • Ashbrook v Clarkstown and Upper Nyack  130.7; IV,42; rev'd 183 NYS2d 1009 (NY App Div 1959)
  • Mikell v Williston  130.8; XIII,56
140. SUNDAY CLOSING LAWS
  • New York v Dean  140.2; III,3,24; 171 NYS2d 100 (NY Ct of App 1958); ACLU
  • Auto-Rite Supply Co v Woodbridge  140.3; III, 47; 135 A2d 515 (NJ Sup Ct 1957)
  • Hertz Washmobile System v South Orange  140.4; III,47; 135 A2d 524 (NJ Sup Ct 1957)
  • Rector, Church Wardens and Vestrymen of Church of Holy Trinity v Melish  140.5; III,47,69; MCLL
  • Ohio v Kidd  140.6; III,69; 150 NE2d 413 (Ohio Sup Ct 1958), cd 358 US 132 (1959)
  • Ohio v Ullner  140.7; III,69; 150 NE2d 413 (Ohio Sup Ct 1958), cd 358 US 131 (1959); ACLU
  • Ohio v Leff  140.8; III,69—IV,43; 150 NE2d 413 (Ohio Sup Ct 1958)
  • Two Guys from Harrison v New Jersey Atty Gen'l Furman  140.9; IV,4; 156 A2d 57 (NJ Sup Ct 1959)
  • Gallagher v Crown Kosher Market  140.10; IV, 43—VII,6; 366 US 617 (1961); ACLU
  • Braunfield v Brown  (140.11), 140.10; VI,106—VII,40; 366 US 599 (1961)
  • New York v Aliphantis  140.12; IV,91; 187 NYS 2d 477 (NY App Div 1959)
  • New York v Cotter  140.13; V,3
  • Nelson's Kiddie City v Oates  140.14; V,3,49
  • Two Guys from Harrison and Channel Lumber Co v Furman  140.15; V,24—VI,8; 160 A2d 265 (NJ Sup Ct 1960); ACLU
  • Morein v Weldon  140.16; V,24—VI,8; 184 FSupp 359 (DC NJ 1960)
  • Fass v New Jersey  140.16a; VI,40,106; app dism'd 370 US 47 (1962)
  • Masters-Jersey v Paramus  140.17; V,49; 16 A2d 841 (NY Sup Ct 1960)
  • Pennsylvania v Cavallero and Levenston  140.18; V,49
  • Two Guys from Harrison—Allentown v McGinley  140.19; V,49—VII,6; 366 US 582 (1961); ACLU
  • McGowan v Maryland  140.20; V,49—VII,40; 366 US 420 (1961)
  • New York v Andob Corp  140.21; V,76
  • Bargain City, USA v Dilworth  140.22; V,76
  • Kentucky v Beskow, d/b/a Modern Living and General Appliance Co  140.23; VI,8
  • Kentucky v Family Fair  140.24; VI,8,56; MCLL
  • Carolina Amusement Co v Martin  140.25; VI,8—VII,6; 115 SE2d 273 (SC Sup Ct 1960), cd 367 US 904 (1961)
  • Giant Tiger Drugs v Ohio  140.26; VI,106—VII,6; 170 NE2d 71 (Ohio Sup Ct 1960), app dism'd 366 US 762 (1961)
  • New York v Welt  140.27; VI,106,107; 168 NE2d 854 (NY Ct of App 1960)
  • Am Automatic Laundry Fdation v NYC  140.28;VI,107
  • Kansas v Hill  140.29; VII,74,106; 369 P2d 365 (Kan Sup Ct 1962)
  • Arlan's Dept Store of Louisville v Kentucky  140.30; VIII,73; 357 SW2d 708 (Ky Ct of App 1962), app dism'd 371 US 218 (1962)
  • Sherbert v Verner  140.31; VIII,129—X,27;374 US 398 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Paine Drug Co  140.32; X,141—XI,19; 254 NYS2d 492 (NY Sup Ct, App Div 1965), 260 NYS2d 444 (NY Ct of App 1965), cd 382 US 838 (1966)
  • New York v Corpora  140.33; X,141—XI,19; 204 NE2d 338 (NY Ct of App 1965), 205 NE2d 876 (NY Ct of App 1965), app dism'd 380 US 520 (1965)
  • Applebaum v Welfare Dept  140.34; XI,74
150. MISCELLANEOUS RESTRICTIONS
151. In Prisons (and 411, 557, 580, 590)
  • Rhea v Sheriff McCullough  (151.1), 30.9; I,69
  • In re Ferguson  (151.2), 151.1; VI,107; 361 P2d 417 (Calif Sup Ct 1961)
  • Pierce v LaVallee  (151.2a), 151.2; VII,6—VIII,129; 293 F2d 233 (CA 2 1961), 212 FSupp 865 (ND NY 1962), aff'd 319 F2d 845 (CA 2 1963), cd 374 US 850 (1963)
  • In re Marvin D Jones  (151.2b), 151.3; VII,74,106; 372 P2d 310 (Calif Sup Ct 1962)
  • Sewell v Pegelow  151.4; VII,74-VIII,13; 291 F2d 196 (CA 4 1961), dism'd without prej 304 F2d 670 (CA 4 1962)
  • Childs v Pegelow  151.4a; IX,45,86; 321 F2d 487 (CA 4 1963), cd 376 US 932 (1964)
  • SaMarion v McGinnis  151.5; VIII,73—X,141;334 F2d 906 (CA 2 1964), cd 379 US 950 (1964); MCLL
  • Plaintiff v McGinnis  151.5a; X,141
  • Cooper v Pate  151.6; IX,10—XIII,56; 324 F2d 165 (CA 7 1963), rev'd 378 US 546 (1964); 382 F2d 578 (CA 7 1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Williford v California  151.7; IX,10—XI,74;217 FSupp 245 (ND Calif 1963), 352 F2d 474 (CA 9 1965)
  • Desmond v Blackwell  151.8; X,103,147; 235 FSupp 246 (MD Penn 1964); MCLL
  • Coleman v District of Columbia Commrs  151.9;X,103; 234 FSupp 408 (ED Va 1964)
  • Banks v Havener  151.10; X,103; 234 FSupp 27 (ED Va 1964)
  • Cooke v Tramburg  151.11; X,103—XI,19; 205 A2d 889 (NJ Sup Ct 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Black Muslims v State Correction Commr (NY)  151.12; XI,74
  • Smyth v Howard  151.13; XIII,56; 365 F2d 428 (CA 4 1966), cd 385 US 988 (1966)
  • Harris v Fitzharris  151.14; XIII,56
  • Johnson v Dist of S Missouri Commrs  151.15; XIII,56; 258 FSupp 669 (WD Mo 1966), 368 F2d 184 (CA 8 1966)
  • Davis v Eaton  151.16; XIV,53
  • Walker v Blackwell  151.17; XIV,53; 411 F2d 23 (CA 5 1969)
  • Abernathy v Cunningham  151.18; XIV,53; 393 F2d 775 (CA 4 1968)
  • Barnett v Rodgers; Clark v Rodgers  151.19; XIII,53; 410 F2d 995 (CA DC 1969)
  • Knuckles v Prasse; Washington v Brierley  151.20; XIII,53—XIV,53; 302 FSupp 1036 (ED Pa 1969)
152. In Other Places (and 550-557)
  • Rev Dawkins v Station KGFJ  (152.a), 140.1; II,3
  • Textile Workers v Lawtex Corp and Belcraft Corp  (152.b), 30.8; I,69
  • Koster v New York State Insurance Dept  (152.c), 120.6; III,69; 171 NYS2d 65 (NY App Div 1955)
  • Clark v California Bd of Educ  (152.1), 120.8; IV,42
  • Re M K Barnhart  (152.2), 120.9; IV,42,90
  • South Dakota ex rel Dunker v Spink Hutterian Brethren  (152.3), 110.19; VI,7; 90 NW2d 365 (SD Sup Ct 1958)
  • In re Anonymous  (152.4), 110.24; VI,106—VII,40; 176 NE2d 917 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • Dawud and Dakota Staton v Muhammad and Muhammad's Temple of Islam  152.5; VII, 106—VIII,13
  • Iowa v Def-Amish  152.6; VIII,13
  • Oliver v Udall  152.7; VIII,74; 306 F2d 819 (CA DC 1962), cd 372 US 908 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Shubin v Calif Dept of Motor Vehicles  152.8; X,27
  • California v Woody  152.9; X,27—XI,19; 394 P2d 813 (Calif Sup Ct 1964)
  • Tygot v Torres  152.10; X,141
  • Hollon v Pierce  152.11; XI,74—XIV,54; 257 CA2d 468 (Calif DCA 1967)
  • California v Petersen  152.12; XII,26—XIV, 54
  • Colorado v Mana Pardeahtan  152.13; XIII,57
  • Massachusetts v Sheridan  152.14; XIII,57
  • Alabama-W Florida Methodist Conf v Prichard Northside Bible Church  152.15; XIII,57
FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: AFFECTING THE ORGANIZATION (200-223)
200. ORGANIZATIONAL PRIVILEGES CHALLENGED
201. As to Meetings (and 11, 63)
  • In re Application of Rosenthal v Stichman  (201.a); NLG
  • International Publishers v Statler-Hilton  201.1; X,103
  • Sullivan Co Comm for Peace v Bd of Supervisors  201.2; XII,26—XIII,57
  • Madole v Barnes  201.3; XII,26—XIII,57; 272 NYS2d 647 (Sup Ct App Div 1966), rev'd 282 NYS2d 225 (NY Ct of App 1967); MCLL
202. As to Tax Exemption (and 130, 266)
  • Publishers New Press (Daily Worker) v Moysey  (202.a), 20.40; I,88; 141 FSupp 340 (SD NY 1956)
  • Communist Party v Moysey  202.1; II,3—VII,75; ACLU
  • Green v Clancy  202.2; II,4—III,24; 350 US 910 (1955)
  • New York ex rel Lefkowitz v Green  202.2a; II, 67—III,47
  • Institute of Pacific Relations v US  202.3; V,76
  • US v Communist Party, Hall  202.4; VII,75—XIII,57
  • Communist Party v Commr of Internal Revenue  202.4a; VII,106—XIII,57
  • Re Fellowship of Reconciliation  202.5; VIII, 97—X,27
  • Revocation of Exemption of Christian Echoes Ministry  202.6; X,103—XIII,57
  • Christian Echoes Nat'l Ministry v US  202.6a; XIII,57; 404 F2d 1066 (CA 10 1968)
  • Parker v Commr of Internal Revenue  202.7; XIII,57; 365 F2d 792 (CA 8 1966), cd 385 US 1026 (1967)
203. As to NLRB Certification (and 245, 291)
  • Farmer v International Fur & Leather Workers Union of US & Canada  (203.a); 117 FSupp 35 (DC DC 1953), 221 F2d 862 (CA DC 1955); MCLL
  • Farmer v United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America (UE)  (203.b); 211 F2d 36 (CA DC 1953), cd 347 US 943 (1954); MCLL
  • Herzog v American Communications Assn  (203.c); MCLL
  • Leedom v Int'l Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers  203.1, 165.1; I,36—II,33; 226 F2d 780 (CA DC 1955), 352 US 145 (1956)
  • Amalg Meat Cutters & Butchers Wkmen, AFL-CIO v NLRB  203.2; II,4,33; 352 US 153 (1956); MCLL
  • Dennis v US  203.3; II,33—XIII,57; 302 F2d 5 (CA 10 1962), 346 F2d 10 (CA 10 1965), rev'd 384 US 855 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Intl Bhd of Electrical Workers v Universal Mfg Corp  203.4; XI,75
204. As to Continued Existence (and 63, 213, 223)
  • IWO v New York  (204.a); 113 NYS2d 755, 115 NYS2d 824, 112 NE2d 280, cd 346 US 857 (1953); MCLL; NLG
  • Pennsylvania ex rel Truscott v Yiddisher Kultur Farband  (204.b), 180.2; I,7; 116 A2d 555 (Penn Sup Ct 1955); ACLU
  • New York v Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Comm  (204.c), 180.3; I,36,54
  • Smith v Faubus  (204.d), 522.Ark.3b; III,39—V,4; 327 SW2d 562 (Ark Sup Ct 1959)
  • NAACP v Alabama ex rel Flowers  204.1; II,4—X,28; 357 US 449 (1959); 360 US 240 (1959); 377 US 288 (1964); 9 RRLR 1392 (Ala Sup Ct 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • NAACP v Gallion, Ala Atty Genl  204.1a; III, 70—VII,41; 368 US 16 (1962)
  • Texas v NAACP  204.2; II,4—III,24; 2 RRLR 678 (Tex Ct of Civ App 1957)
  • Revenue Commr of Ga v NAACP  204.3; II,34—VII,41; 107 SE2d 243 (Ga Ct of App 1959), cd 359 US 550 (1959)
  • NAACP and Calhoun v Judge Pye  204.3a; III, 24,48
  • Harrison v NAACP  204.4; II,34—VIII,74; 360 US 167 (1959)
  • NAACP v Button, Va Atty Genl  204.4a; IV,6—VIII,74; 116 SE2d 55 (Va Sup Ct 1960), 371 US 415 (1963); MCLL
  • NAACP Legal Defense Fund v Gray  204.4b; IV, 91—VIII,14
  • Virginia ex rel Virginia State Bar v NAACP, NAACP Legal Defense and Educ Fund  204.4c; VI,10—IX,87
  • NAACP v Arkansas ex rel Bennett  204.5; III,25—IV,91; 319 SW2d 33 (Ark Sup Ct 1958), cd 360 US 909 (1959)
  • Arkansas v NAACP  204.6; III,25—VI,10
  • Arkansas ex rel Atty Genl v NAACP  204.7; III,25—VI,10
  • Arkansas ex rel Bennett v NAACP Legal Def and Educ Fund  204.8; III,25—XIII,58; 319 SW2d 33 (Ark Sup Ct 1958)
  • Arkansas ex rel Bennett v NAACP  204.9; III, 25—XIII,58; 178 FSupp 191 (ED Ark 1959), 370 SW2d 79 (Ark Sup Ct 1963)
  • NAACP v Bennett  204.9a; IX,87; 178 FSupp 188 (ED Ark 1959), 360 US 471 (1959); 178 FSupp 191 (ED Ark 1959), 370 SW2d 79 (Ark Sup Ct 1963)
  • Bates v Little Rock  204.10; III,25—V,24; 361 US 516 (1960); MCLL
  • Arkansas NAACP v Bennett  204.11; III,25—V,4; 360 US 471 (1959)
  • North Little Rock v Fair  204.12; III,25—IV,6
  • North Little Rock v Williams  204.13; III,26
  • North Little Rock NAACP Branch v Perry  204.14; III,26
  • Re Virginia State Conf of Branches, NAACP  204.15; V,25,77
  • Louisiana v NAACP  204.16
  • NAACP v Martin  204.17; V,25—VI,107; 366 US 293 (1961)
  • Alabama ex rel Gallion v CORE  204.18; VII, 75—VIII,74; 6 RRLR 528 (Ala Cir Ct 1961)
  • CORE v Gallion and Alabama  204.18a; VII,75—VIII,74
  • Clemmons v CORE  204.19; VII,75; 201 FSupp 737 (ED La 1962)
  • Smith v Harrison  (204.e), 204.19; XI,75
  • Re Fowler, Honorary State Cyclops of KKK, and 100 John Does  204.20; XII,26
  • Landlord v Wallace  204.21; XIII,58
210. COMPULSORY REGISTRATION
211. Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act (and 336)
  • Brief on the Unconstitutionality of the Mundt-Nixon Bill (HR 5852)  (211.a); NLG
  • Brownell v American Slav Congress  (211.b), 140.2; I,5
  • Brownell v Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Comm  (211.c), 140.3; I,5
  • Weinstock v US  (211.d), 140.50; I,53; MCLL
  • Communist Party v SACB  211.1; II,4—VII,41; 223 F2d 531 (CA DC), rev'd and rem 351 US 151 (1956); aff'd 367 US 1 (1961); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • US v Communist Party  211.1a; VII,41—XIII,58; 367 US 1 (1961); 331 F2d 807 (CA DC 1963), cd 377 US 968 (1964); 373 F2d 682 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Hall, Davis  211.1b-1c; VII,75—XI,75; NLG
  • Albertson, Proctor v SACB  211.1d-1m; VII, 106—XII,26; 332 F2d 317 (CA DC 1964), rev'd 382 US 70 (1965); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Kennedy v Taylor, Dobbs  211.1n-1t; VIII,97—XI,20
  • Katzenbach v Nelson  211.1u; X,103
  • Jefferson School v SACB  211.2; II,4—IX,45; 331 F2d 76 (CA DC 1963)
  • Labor Youth League v SACB  211.3; II,5—IX, 11; 322 F2d 364 (CA DC 1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Nat'l Council of American-Soviet Friendship v SACB  211.4; II,5—IX,11; 322 F2d 375 (CA DC 1963)
  • Patterson as Liquidator of Civil Rights Congress v SACB  211.5; II,5—IX,45; 322 F2d 395 (CA DC 1963)
  • SACB v Washington Pension Union  211.6; II,5—IX,11; 322 F2d 398 (CA DC 1963)
  • Haufrecht v SACB  211.7; II,5—VIII,98
  • California Labor School v SACB  211.8; II,5—IX,11; 322 F2d 393 (CA DC 1963)
  • American Comm for Protection of Foreign Born v SACB  211.9; II,5—XI,75; 331 F2d 53 (CA DC 1963), 380 US 503 (1965); MCLL
  • Kennedy v California Emergency Defense Committee  211.10; II,67—IX,88
  • Rogers v Connecticut Volunteers for Civil Rights  211.11; III,4—V,4
  • Brownell v Save Our Sons Committee  211.12; III,4
  • Blau v SACB  (211.e), 211.12; IV,71—IX,12; 322 F2d 397 (CA DC 1963)
  • Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v SACB  211.13; VII,7—X,142; 331 F2d 64 (CA DC 1963), 380 US 512 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Weinstock v SACB  211.14; VIII,16—IX,12; 331 F2d 75 (CA DC 1963)
  • Kennedy v Advance  211.15; VIII,74—XI,20
  • WEB DuBois Clubs of America v Katzenbach  211.16; XI,75—XIII,58; 277 FSupp 971 (DC DC 1967), 389 US 309 (1967); MCLL
  • WEB DuBois Clubs of America v Clark  211.16a; XI,75—XIV,54; 389 US 309 (1967); 285 FSupp 619 (DC DC 1968); MCLL
  • Boorda v Subversive Activities Control Board; Archuleta & Holley v SACB  211.17; XIV, 54; I ACQ 30; 421 F2d 1142 (CA DC 1969); MCLL
212. Under 1954 Communist Control Act
  • United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v Brownell  (212.a), 150.2; I,6,70; 232 F2d 687 (CA DC 1956)
  • Int'l Union, Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers v SACB  212.1; II,67—XII,27; 353 F2d 848 (CA DC 1965)
  • Rogers v United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers  212.2; II,5—IV,44
  • U E Local 259 v McCullough  212.2a; IV,44
213. Under State Laws (and 204, 245)
  • Albertson v Millard  (213.a), 210.3; I,8,91; 345 US 242 (1953); on rem 77 NW2d 104 (Mich Sup Ct 1956); MCLL; ACLU
  • Alabama v Knox  (213.b), 210.1; I,8; 87 So2d 671 (Ala Ct of App 1956)
  • Louisiana ex rel LeBlanc, Atty Genl v Lewis & NAACP  213.1
  • Lewis & NAACP v LeBlanc, Atty Genl  213.2
  • NAACP v Eure, North Carolina Secy of State  213.3; II,5,13
  • Wikler, NY Supt of Insurance, as Liquidator of Int'l Workers Order v City Terrace Cultural Center  (213.4), 213.3; IV,44,77; MCLL
214. Under Foreign Agents Registration Act
  • Rabinowitz and Boudin v Robert Kennedy  (214.a); 318 F2d 181 (CA DC 1963), 376 US 605 (1964); MCLL
  • Re Alexander Defense Comm  214.1; XI,75
220. LISTING AND INVESTIGATING
221. By the Attorney General of the United States
  • Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v McGrath  (221.a), 160.2; I,6; 341 US 123 (1951); MCLL; ACLU
  • Methodist Federation for Social Action v Eastland  (221.b), 162.1; I,90; 141 FSupp 729 (DC DC 1956)
  • National Lawyers Guild v Brownell  221.1; II,5—IV,8; 215 F2d 485 (CA DC 1954), 126 FSupp 730 (DC DC 1954); 225 F2d 552 (CA DC 1955), cd 351 US 927 (1956); MCLL; NLG
  • National Lawyers Guild v Rogers  221.1a; III,70
  • Nat'l Council of American-Soviet Friendship v Brownell  221.2; II,5,52; 243 F2d 222 (CA DC 1957)
  • Assn of Lithuanian Workers v Brownell  221.3; II,6—III,5; 247 F2d 64 (CA DC 1957), rem to dismiss as moot 355 US 23 (1957)
  • Rogers v Independent Socialist League  221.4; II,6—IV,8
  • Kennedy v Californians for Bill of Rights  221.5; II,6—VI,84
  • Kennedy v Natl Council of Arts, Sciences & Professions  221.6; II,6—VI,84
  • Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v Attorney General of US  221.7; XIV,55; 409 F2d 1139 (CA DC 1969); MCLL
222. By Congressional Committees
  • Wheeldin v Wheeler  222.1; IV,4—VIII,98; 283 F2d 535 (CA 9 1960), 302 F2d 36 (1961), aff'd 373 US 647 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Burton v Wheeler  222.2; IV,44,92
  • Sloat v Walter  222.3; IV,71; MCLL
  • Sloat v Wheeler and Waters  222.4; IV,92; MCLL
  • California v Bishop  222.5; IV,93—V,5
  • Tuominen v Wheeler  222.6; V,5,78
223. By State Authorities (and 24, 281)
  • Brandhove v Robinson; Tenney v Brandhove  (223.a); 341 US 367 (1951); MCLL
  • Kaplan v Bowker  (223.b), 170.2; I,7,54; 131 NE2d 372 (Mass Sup Ct 1956)
  • Luscomb v Bowker  223.1; II,6—IV,8; 136 NE2d 192 (Mass Sup Ct 1956)
  • Tormey v Bowker  223.2; II,6—IV,8
  • Elfbrandt v Russell  223.3; VII,8—XIII,58; 381 P2d 554 (Ariz Sup Ct 1963), 397 P2d 944 (Ariz Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 384 US 11 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Liveright v Joint Comm of Gen'l Assembly of Tenn  223.4; XIV,55; 279 FSupp 205 (MD Tenn 1968)
  • Black Unity League of Kentucky v Miller  223.5; XIV,55; 394 US 100 (1969)
  • Braden v Nunn  223.5a; XIV,55
  • Goldman v Olson  223.6; XIV,55; 286 FSupp 35 (WD Wisc 1968)
FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: AFFECTING THE MEMBERS (240-294)
240. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR MEMBERSHIP
241. Under Smith Act: for Conspiracy
  • Dennis v US  (241.a); 341 US 494 (1951); MCLL; ACLU
  • Frankfeld v USA  (241.b); cd 344 US 922 (1953); MCLL; ACLU
  • Flynn v US  (241.c), 110.11; I,4; 216 F2d 354 (CA 2 1954), cd 348 US 909 (1955); MCLL
  • Yates v US  241.1; II,6—III,27; 354 US 298 (1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Mesarosh v US  241.2; II,6—III,6; 352 US 1, 808, 862 (1956); MCLL; ACLU
  • Wellman v US  241.3; II,6—IV,9; 354 US 931 (1957), rem 253 F2d 601 (CA 6 1958)
  • Fujimoto v US  241.4; II,6—III,49; 251 F2d 342 (CA 9 1958)
  • Huff v US  241.5; II,6—III,49; 251 F2d 342 (CA 9 1958); MCLL
  • Sentner v US  241.6; II,6—IV,9 (re in forma pauperis) 348 US 935 (1955); 253 F2d 310 (CA 8 1958)
  • US v Kuzma  241.7; II,6—III,71; 249 F2d 619 (CA 3 1957)
  • US v Bary  241.8; II,7—VI,108; 292 F2d 53 (CA 10 1961); ACLU
  • US v Brandt  241.9; II,7—IV,93; 256 F2d 79 (CA 6 1958); MCLL
  • US v Silverman  241.10; II,7—III,49; 248 F2d 671 (CA 2 1957), cd 355 US 942 (1957)
  • Jackson v US  241.11; II,7—IV,93; 257 F2d 830 (CA 2 1958)
  • US v Russo  241.12; II,7—IV,93
  • US v Mirabel  241.13; II,7—III,27
  • US v Thompson & Green  241.14; III,27—VII,42; 356 US 165 (1958)
242. Under Smith Act: for Membership Only
  • US v Richmond and Connelly  (242.a); 354 US 298 (1957); MCLL
  • US v Stone  (242.b), 201.1; I,8
  • Lightfoot v US  242.1; II,7—VII,8; 355 US 2 (1957); MCLL; NLG
  • Scales v US  242.2; II,7—VIII,75; 367 US 203 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Hall, Davis, Winter, Potash, Green, Thompson, Winston, Gates  242.2a; VIII,98
  • US v Blumberg  242.3; II,7—VI,12; MCLL
  • Noto v US  242.4; II,7—VII,42; 367 US 290 (1961); ACLU
  • US v Weiss  242.5; II,7—VII,42
  • US v Blum  242.6; II,7—III,27
  • US v Russo  242.7; II,7—VIII,17
  • Hellman v US  242.8; II,7—VII,42; 298 F2d 810 (CA 9 1961)
  • US v Foster  242.9; V,5—VI,57; 278 F2d 567 (CA 2 1960), cd 364 US 834 (1960); MCLL; NLG
243. Under 18 USC §2384
  • Puerto Rico v Reynolds  (243.a), 110.20; I,4; 77 PRR 421 (Puerto Rico Sup Ct 1954)
  • Castro, Gandia and Lebron v US  (243.b), 120.2; I,5,89; 228 F2d 807 (CA 2 1956); 255 F2d 454 (CA 2 1958); 222 F2d 531 (CA 2 1955)
  • US v Lebron  243.1; III,6,71; 222 F2d 531 (CA 2 1955), cd 350 US 876 (1955)
  • US v Castro, Valle  243.2; III,6,27
244. Under Kennedy-Landrum-Griffin Act (and 203, 291)
  • US v Brown  244.1; VI,109—XI,20; 334 F2d 488 (CA 9 1964), aff'd 381 US 437 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
245. Under State Laws (and 54)
  • Shaw v Oklahoma  (245.a); MCLL; NLG
  • Berenson v Detroit  (245.b); MCLL
  • California v McCormick  (245.c); MCLL
  • Shub v Simpson  (245.d); MCLL
  • Auerbach v California  (245.e); MCLL
  • Coleman & Schusterman v Perdew  (245.g); MCLL
  • S Hall v Birmingham  (245.h); MCLL
  • Lancaster v Hammond  (245.i)
  • Thompson v Wallin  (245.j); MCLL
  • Trainor v Cannon  (245.k)
  • Massachusetts v Struik  (245.1), 130.2; I,5,89; MCLL
  • Massachusetts v Hood  (245.2), 130.5; I,5,89; MCLL
  • Massachusetts v Struik  (245.3), 210.4; I,8,91; MCLL
  • Massachusetts v Hood  (245.4), 210.5; I,8,91
  • Feldman v Ervin  (245.5); 210.2; I,8,72; 128 FSupp 822 (SD Fla 1955)
  • Pennsylvania v Nelson  (245.6), 130.1; I,5,89; 350 US 497 (1956); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pennsylvania v Dolson  (245.7), 244.1; II,7,69
  • Pennsylvania v Onda  (245.8), 244.2; II,7—III,27
  • Kentucky v Carl Braden  (245.9), 130.3; I,5,89; 291 SW2d 843 (Ky Ct of App 1956); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Kentucky v Anne Braden  (245.10), 244.3; II,7.35
  • Alabama v Rev King  (245.11), 244.4; II,7—III,27
  • Louisiana v Jenkins  (245.12), 244.5; II,53—IV,45; 107 So2d 648 (La Sup Ct 1958); ACLU
  • Tennessee ex rel Sloan v Highlander Folk School  (245.13), 244.6; V,5—VII,42; 345 SW2d 667 (Tenn Sup Ct 1960), cd 368 US 840 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Wood v Alabama  (245.14), 244.7; V,5; 116 So2d 400 (Ala App Ct 1959)
  • Indiana v Levitt, Bingham, Morgan  245.15; VIII,98—XIII,59; 203 NE2d 821 (Ind Sup Ct 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Levitt v Indiana  245.15a; XI,20—XIII,59; MCLL
  • The Dombrowski Litigation  245.16—245.16e
  • Louisiana v Smith, Waltzer, Dombrowski  245.16; IX,12—XIV,55; MCLL
  • Dombrowski v La State Police  245.16a; IX,13—X,30; MCLL
  • Dombrowski v Eastland  245.16b; IX,13—XIV,56; 358 F2d 821 (CA DC 1966), 387 US 82 (1967), 389 US 802 (1967)
  • Pfister v Arceneaux  245.16c; IX,13—XIII,59; 376 F2d 821 (CA 5 1966), cd 389 US 986 (1967); MCLL
  • Dombrowski v Pfister  245.16d; IX,13—XIV,55; 227 FSupp 556 (SD La 1964), rev'd and rem 380 US 479 (1965); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • SCEF v Pfister  245.16e; XIV,56
  • Stanford v Texas  245.17; IX,46—X,142; 379 US 476 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
246. Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act
  • US v Robel  246.1; VIII,99—XIII,59; 254 FSupp 291 (WD Wash 1965), aff'd 389 US 258 (1967)
  • Bick v Mitchell  246.2; XIV,56; I ACQ 19
250. CIVIL DISABILITIES FOR MEMBERSHIP: FEDERAL
251. In Federal Employment (and 30, 268)
  • Rothrock v Miller  (251.a)
  • Van Gelder, Pankey and Frome v UNESCO  (251.b), 220.1a; I,37
  • Bernstein v UNESCO  (251.c), 220.1b; I,37.54
  • Peters v Hobby  (251.d), 220.2; I,9; 349 US 331 (1955); ACLU
  • Re Taylor  (251.e), 220.4; I,9.37
  • Kutcher v Higley  (251.f), 220.5; I,9.91; 235 F2d 505 (CA DC 1956)
  • Cole v Young  (251.g), 220.6; I,9,91; 351 US 536 (1956); ACLU
  • Re Prof Albert Sprague Coolidge  (251.h), 220.9; I,72
  • Leff, Duberg and Wilcox v Evans  251.1; II,7, 36
  • Berman v Summerfield  251.2; II,8
  • Liner v Summerfield  251.3; II,8
  • Service v Dulles  251.4; II,8—III,6; 354 US 363 (1957)
  • Duncan v Summerfield  251.5; II,36—III,49; 251 F2d 896 (CA DC 1957)
  • A Duncan v Blattenberger  251.6; II,36—III, 71
  • Tucker v Brucker  251.7; II,53—III,28; rev'd 251 F2d 898 (CA DC 1958); ACLU
  • Bernabei v Summerfield  251.8; II,53—III,28; 251 F2d 898 (CA DC 1958); ACLU
  • Vitarelli v Seaton  251.9; II,53—V,5; 359 US 535 (1959)
  • Coleman v Brucker  251.10; II,53—IV,45; 257 F2d 661 (CA DC 1958)
  • Kutcher v US  251.11; III,28,71; MCLL; ACLU
  • Schlafer v Puerto Rico Finance Dept  251.12; III,71
  • Suarez v Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Dept  251.13; III,71
  • Leiner v US  251.14; IV,45; 181 FSupp 400 (US Ct of Claims 1958)
  • Dew v Halaby  251.15; VI,58—XI,20; 317 F2d 582 (CA DC 1963), dism'd 379 US 951 (1964)
  • In the Matter of Barney Hilburn  251.16; IX, 89; MCLL
  • Jackson v Allen Industries  251.30; IV,45; 250 F2d 629 (CA 6 1958), cd 356 US 972 (1958)
  • Steinberg v US  251.50; IV,45,72; 163 FSupp 590 (US Ct of Claims 1958)
  • Garrott v US  251.52; VIII,17—X,104; 340 F2d 615 (US Ct of Claims 1965); MCLL
  • In re Loletta Leary  251.53; VIII,130—X,142
  • Re John O'Brien  251.54; XII,27
  • Bennett v US  251.55; XII,27; 356 F2d 525 (US Ct of Claims 1966), vac and rem 385 US 4 (1966)
  • Kearney v US Civil Service Commn  251.56; XIII,60
  • Soltar v Postmaster Gen of US  251.57; XIII, 60—XIV,56; 277 FSupp 579 (ND Calif 1967); MCLL
  • Margetich v Civil Service Commn  251.58; XIII,60
  • In re Employee  251.59; XIII,60
  • Kahn v Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare  251.61; XIV,56; 302 FSupp 178 (DC Mass 1969)
252. As to Passport Applications and Right to Travel
  • Dulles v Nathan  (252.a), 280.1; I,12; 225 F2d 29 (CA DC 1955)
  • Clark v Dulles  (252.b), 280.2; I,12
  • Foreman v Dulles  (252.c), 280.3; I,12
  • Kamen v Dulles  (252.d), 280.4; I,12
  • Zlatowski v Dulles  (252.e), 280.5; I,12
  • Maxfield, Shepard v Dulles  (252.f), 280.7; I,12
  • Schactman v Dulles  (252.g), 280.9; I,12; 225 F2d 938 (CA DC 1955); ACLU
  • Carl Foreman v Dulles  (252.h), 280.10; I, 39,56
  • Golden v Dulles  (252.i), 280.31; I,13,56
  • Boudin v Dulles  252.1; II,8,36; 235 F2d 532 (CA DC 1956)
  • Dayton v Dulles  252.2; II,8—III,71; 357 US 144 (1958); ACLU
  • Stewart v Dulles  252.3; II,8—III,28
  • Chodorov v Dulles  252.4; II,8,36
  • McIntire v Dulles  252.5; II,8
  • Robeson v Dulles  252.20; II,8—III,71; MCLL
  • Kent v Dulles  252.21; II,8—IV,45; 357 US 116 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • Briehl v Dulles  252.22; II,8—III,71; 357 US 144 (1958)
  • Leff v Herter  252.23; II,8—V,78
  • DuBerg v Dulles  252.24; II,8—IV,10
  • Lamont v Dulles  252.25; II,69—IV,10
  • Strong v Dulles  252.26; III,50—IV,10
  • Worthy v Herter  252.27; III,50—V,26; 270 F2d 905 (CA DC 1959), cd 361 US 918 (1959); MCLL; ACLU
  • Worthy v US  252.27a; VII,76—IX,89; 328 F2d 386 (CA 5 1964); MCLL
  • Frank v Herter  252.28; IV,45—V,26; 269 F2d 245 (CA DC 1959), cd 361 US 918 (1959)
  • Re Rev McKenna  252.29; IV,45—VI,13
  • Jerome v Herter  252.30; IV,45—VI,13
  • Porter v Herter  252.31; V,6—VI,13; 278 F2d 280 (CA DC 1960), cd 365 US 837 (1960); ACLU
  • Perlo v Herter  252.32; V,26
  • Flynn v Rusk  252.33; VII,76—IX,89
  • Aptheker v Rusk  252.34; VIII,75—XI,20; 378 US 500 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Zemel v Rusk, Kennedy  252.35; VIII,75—XIII, 60; 381 US 1 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • MacEwen v Rusk, Kennedy  252.36; VIII,75—XI,20; 228 FSupp 306 (ED Pa 1964), aff'd 344 F2d 963 (CA 3 1965); MCLL
  • US v Sherwood  252.51; III,72—V,26; 267 F2d 398 (CA 9 1959), cd 361 US 852 (1959)
  • US v Bigelow  252.51a; III,72
  • US v Reynolds  252.52; IV,10—VI,84; 286 F2d 433 (CA 9 1960); MCLL
  • US v Stallings, Lazar, Yoes  252.53; VII,107 —VIII,75
  • US v Steadman, Bonello, Zahn  252.54; VII,107 —VIII,18
  • Copeland v Rusk  252.55; VIII,99—X,104; 226 FSupp 20 (DC DC 1964), vac and rem 378 US 588 (1964)
  • Mayer v Rusk  252.56; VIII,99—X,104; 224 FSupp 929 (DC DC 1963), vac and rem 378 US 579 (1964); MCLL
  • Jerome v Sec'y of State Rusk  252.57; VIII,99, 130
  • Travis v US  252.58; IX,13—XIII,60; 241 FSupp 472 (SD Calif 1964), aff'd 353 F2d 506 (CA 9 1965), rev'd 385 US 491 (1967); MCLL
  • US v Laub  252.59; IX,13—XIII,60; 253 FSupp 433 (ED NY 1966), aff'd 385 US 475 (1967); MCLL
  • US v Laub  252.59a; X,32—XI,76; 253 FSupp 433 (ED NY 1966), aff'd 385 US 475 (1967)
  • US v Druckman  252.60; IX,13—X,143
  • US v Seigel  252.61; IX,47—X,32
  • US v Anton  252.62; X,32—XIII,60; MCLL
  • Kissling v Rusk  252.63; X,32
  • In re James Peck  252.64; X,105
  • Re H Stuart Hughes  252.65; XI,76
  • Lynd v Rusk  252.66; XI,76; 389 F2d 940 (CA DC 1967)
  • Wittman v Sec'y of State; Lynd v Rusk  252.67; XIII,60—XIV,57; 389 F2d 940 (CA DC 1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Gregory v Secretary of State  252.68; XIII,60 —XIV,57; 390 F2d 494 (CA DC 1967)
253. As to Military Acceptability, Discharges (and 122, 341)
  • Cpl Kulich  (253.a), 225.1; I,9
  • Lt Dietch  (253.b), 225.2; I,10
  • Lt Mitchell  (253.c), 225.3; I,10
  • Re Anonymous  (253.d), 225.24; I,73
  • Re Private Staebler  (253.e), 450.2; I,19
  • St Helen v Lt Gen Wyman  (253.f), 450.3; I, 19,97; 222 F2d 890 (CA 9 1955), 139 FSupp 545 (ND Cal 1956)
  • Re Jensen  253.1; II,8,70
  • Schustack v Herren  253.2; II,8; 234 F2d 134 (CA 2 1956); ACLU
  • Bernstein v Herren  253.3; II,9,36; 234 F2d 434 (CA 2 1956), cd 352 US 840 (1956); ACLU
  • Harmon v Brucker  253.4; II,9—III,50; 355 US 579 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • Marshall v Brucker  253.5; II,9—III,50; 356 US 24 (1958)
  • Abramowitz v Brucker  253.6; II,9—III,50; 355 US 579 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • Bland v Hartman  253.7; II,9—III,7; 245 F2d 311 (CA 9 1957)
  • Michaelson v Herren  253.8; II,54; 242 F2d 693 (CA 2 1957)
  • Olenick v Brucker  253.9; IV,10—VII,42; 173 FSupp 493 (DC DC 1959)
  • Re X  253.10; IV,45,72
  • Dr Erdreich v US  253.50; IV,72—V,6
  • Dr Belsky v US  253.51; IV,72—VI,109; 290 F2d 593 (US Ct of Claims 1961)
  • Re Leon Day  253.52; XII,27
  • Ofsevit v Dept of Defense  253.53; XII,28
  • Re Airman  253.54; XIII,61
  • Kennedy v Sec'y of Navy  253.55; 6th NDL 235: 221; 401 F2d 990 (CA DC 1968)
254. As to Veterans Disability Payments
  • Re Kutcher  (254.a), 227.3; I,55
  • Wellman v Whittier  254.1; II,9—IV,46; 259 F2d 163 (CA DC 1958); ACLU
  • Thompson v Gleason  254.2; II,9—XI,20; 185 FSupp 306 (DC DC 1960), app dism'd 365 US 465 (1961); rev'd 317 F2d 901 (CA DC 1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Thompson v McNamara  254.3; XI,76—XIV,57; 408 F2d 154 (CA DC 1968); MCLL; ACLU
255. As to Social Security Benefits (and 263, 346, 422)
  • Matter of Bittelman, Mindel, Foster  (255.a), 257.1; I,56,93
  • Nestor v Flemming  255.1; IV,46—V,78; 363 US 603 (1960)
  • Weiss and Pollitzer v Gardner  255.2; XI,77—XIII,61; 263 FSupp 184 (SD NY 1966), vac 386 US 9 (1967); MCLL
  • Evans v Gardner  255.3; XI,77
  • Reed v Gardner  255.4; XII,28—XIII,61; 261 FSupp 87 (CD Calif 1966); MCLL
  • Healey, Taylor v Gardner  255.5; XIII,61—XIV,57; MCLL
256. In Housing Projects (and 423, 530-535.100)
  • Rudder v US  (256.1), 410.1; I,17; 226 F2d 51 (CA DC 1955); MCLL; ACLU
  • Lawson v Housing Auth of Milwaukee  (256.2), 410.2; I,18,41; 70 NW2d 605 (Wisc Sup Ct 1955), cd 350 US 882 (1955)
  • Dailey v Housing Auth of Seattle  (256.3), 410.3; I,18; MCLL; ACLU
  • Peters v NYC Housing Auth  (256.4), 410.4; I, 18,58; 143 NYS2d 609 (NY App Div 1955); ACLU
  • Weixel v NYC Housing Auth  (256.5), 410.5; I, 18,96; 143 NYS2d 589 (NY App Div 1955)
  • Levine v New York City Housing Auth  (256.6), 410.6; I,18
  • New York City Housing Auth v Sichel  (256.7), 410.7; I,18,41
  • Dupree v Baltimore City Housing Auth  (256.8), 410.8; I,18
  • Wheatley v Buffalo Municipal Housing Auth  (256.9), 410.9; I,19
  • Richmond Housing Auth v Zumwalt  (256.10), 410.10; I,41,97
  • San Francisco Housing Auth v Horner  (256.11), 410.11; I,41,58
  • Los Angeles Housing Auth v Cordova  (256.12), 410.12; I,58,97; 279 P2d 215 (Calif Ct of App 1955), cd 350 US 969 (1956)
  • Kutcher v Housing Auth of Newark  (256.13), 410.13; I,59; 119 A2d 1 (NJ Sup Ct 1955)
  • Dept of Justice announcement, Aug 3, 1956  (256.14); II,9
  • Wright v Housing Auth of Denver  (256.15), 256.1; III,50; 318 P2d 1103 (Colo Sup Ct 1957); ACLU
257. As to Federal License Applications (and 17)
  • Appeal of Shonick  (257.a), 270.1; I,12
  • In re Application of Lamb for Renewal of TV License  257.1; II,9,70; MCLL
  • In re Application of Lafferty for Renewal of Radio Operator's License  257.2; II,9—IV,11
  • Borrow v Fedl Communications Comm  257.3; IV,11—VI,109; 285 F2d 666 (CA DC 1960), cd 364 US 892 (1960)
  • In re Johnson  257.4; IV,11—V,79
  • Cronan v Federal Communications Comm  257.5; IV,11—VI,109; 285 F2d 288 (CA DC 1960), cd 366 US 904 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Halaby, Adm, Fedl Aviation Agency v Susemihl  257.6; VII,42—X,32; MCLL
  • Blumenthal v US  257.7; VIII,99; 318 F2d 276 (CA DC 1963), cd 373 US 951 (1963)
  • Ilowite v US  257.9: XIV,57; 390 F2d 589 (CA 3 1968), vac 393 US 15 (1968)
258. Through Deportation Proceedings (and 358)
  • In re Sciortino  (258.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Quattrone v Nicolls  (258.b); MCLL
  • In re Tora Upstead Rystead  (258.c); MCLL
  • In re Krishna Chandra  (258.d); MCLL
  • In re Arpad Stancek  (258.e); MCLL
  • US ex rel Schlossberg (or John Daley) v Ault  (258.f); MCLL
  • US v Steuben  (258.g); MCLL
  • US ex rel Joe Lukas v Ault  (258.h); MCLL
  • US v MacKay  (258.i); MCLL
  • US v Mackie  (258.j); MCLL
  • US v H Carlisle  (258.k); MCLL
  • Crain v Boyd, Dist Dir  (258.L), 290.1; I,13; 237 F2d 927 (CA 9 1956)
  • Re Diaz  (258.m), 540.8; I,99
  • Galvan v Press  (258.n); 347 US 522 (1954)
  • Harisiades v Shaughnessy  (258.o); 342 US 580 (1952)
  • US v DelaCruz  (258.p), 290.3; I,13
  • Re Vidolin  (258.s), 540.9; I,99
  • Rowoldt v Perfetto  258.1; II,10—III,50; 355 US 115 (1957); MCLL; NLG
  • Re Janosco  258.2; II,70—IV,46
  • Re Zuker  258.3; III,28
  • In re Bonetti  258.4; III,72—VIII,75; 356 US 691 (1958); MCLL
  • Diaz v Barber  258.5; IV,46,94; 261 F2d 300 (CA 9 1958)
  • Niukkanen v McAlexander  258.6; V,6,51; 362 US 390 (1960); MCLL
  • Wolf v Boyd  258.7; V,79—XII,28; 215 F2d 377 (CA 9 1954), cd 348 US 951 (1954); 238 F2d 249 (CA 9 1957), cd 353 US 936 (1957); 253 F2d 141 (CA 9 1957); 287 F2d 520 (CA 9 1961), cd 365 US 888 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Santiago v Dist Director  258.8; V,79
  • Gastelum-Quinones v Kennedy  258.9; VI,58—VIII,131; 286 F2d 824 (CA DC 1960), rev'd 374 US 469 (1963); MCLL
  • Re Johnston  258.10; VI,58
  • Simon, Firestone v Imm and Nat Service  258.11; VII,77—VIII,19; MCLL
  • Scythes v Webb  258.12; VII,77—VIII,19; 307 F2d 905 (CA 7 1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Eng Let Poy  258.13; VIII,19
  • In re Maurice Paul  258.14; IX,47
  • Sherman v Immigration and Naturalization Service  258.15; X,33—XIII,61; 350 F2d 894 (CA 2 1965), rem 385 US 276 (1966); MCLL
  • In re Deportation of Anonymous  258.16; X,105
  • Re David Hyun  258.17; I,44—XI,77
  • Lahtinen v Immigration and Naturalization Service  258.18; XIII,62; MCLL
  • Dymytryshyn v Esperdy  258.19; XIII,62—XIV,58; 285 FSupp 507, 511 (SD NY 1968), aff'd 393 US 77 (1968); MCLL
  • In re Berenyi  258.20; XIII,62; 239 FSupp 725 (DC Mass 1965), aff'd 352 F2d 71 (CA 1 1965), aff'd 385 US 630 (1967)
  • INS v Sanders  258.21; XIV,58; MCLL
259. Through Denaturalization and Naturalization Proceedings (and 358)
  • Schneiderman v US  (259.a); 320 US 118 (1943); MCLL; ACLU
  • Scaccio v Barber  (259.b), 30.5; I,34,88; 235 F2d 782 (CA 9 1956)
  • Re Schmitt  (259.c), 30.5a; I,88
  • In re Myer Klig  (259.d); MCLL
  • Nowak v US  259.1; III,7,72; 356 US 660 (1958); MCLL; NLG
  • Maisenberg v US  259.2; III,7,73; 356 US 670 (1958)
  • US v Minerich  259.3; III,29,50; 250 F2d 721 (CA 7 1957)
  • Polites v US  259.4; IV,11—VI,58; 364 US 426 (1960); MCLL
  • Chaunt v US  259.5; IV,95—VI,14; 364 US 350 (1960); MCLL
  • US v Richmond  259.6; V,27; MCLL
  • US v Fiorini  259.7; V,51
  • US v Bimba  259.8; IX,47—XIII,62; 233 FSupp 966 (ED NY 1964); MCLL
  • Re Vasiloff  259.50; III,73; ACLU
  • Re Eugene Grundt  259.51; VII,77
  • Sittler v US  259.52; VIII,99; 316 F2d 312 (CA 2 1963)
  • Re Application of Hirsh  259.53; XIII,62; 308 F2d 562 (CA 9 1962)
  • Petition of Nomland  259.54; XIII,62; MCLL
  • Weitzman v US  259.55; XIII,62—XIV,58; 284 FSupp 514 (DC Minn 1968); MCLL
  • LaPenieks v Immigration and Naturalization Service  (259.56); 5th NDL 235:220; 389 F2d 343 (CA 9 1968), cd 391 US 951 (1968)
260. CIVIL DISABILITIES FOR MEMBERSHIP: STATE, LOCAL AND PRIVATE
261. In State, Local Government Employment (and 421)
  • Parker v Los Angeles County  (261.a); 338 US 327 (1948); MCLL
  • Steiner v Los Angeles County  (261.b); 338 US 327 (1949); MCLL
  • Local No 201, American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees v Muskegon  (261.c); MCLL; ACLU
  • Wilkins v Carlander  261.1; II,10—XIII,62
  • Nagin v Zurmuhlen  261.2; II,10—III,73
  • Hehir v NYC Transit Auth  261.3; II,10—VII,8
  • Hamilton v Monaghan  261.4; II,10,54; 140 NYS2d 17 (NY App Div 1955)
  • Reif v NYC Dept of Hospitals  261.5; II,10—IV,11
  • Aresco v NYC Police Commr Kennedy  261.6; II,37
  • Crowe v Wayne, Mich  261.7; II,37—VII,108; 114 NW2d 240 (Mich Sup Ct 1962)
  • Bryan v Austin, Supt of Schools  261.8; II,37,70; 148 FSupp 563 (ED SC 1957)
  • Wolstenholme v Oakland Library Bd  261.9; II,54—VI,15; 351 P2d 321 (Calif Sup Ct 1960)
  • Gottlieb v New Orleans  261.10; III,7,73; 101 So2d 242 (La Ct of App 1958)
  • New York City Housing Auth v Wyatt  261.11; III,29,73
  • Wilson v Los Angeles  261.12; IV,72—V,52; 351 P2d 761 (Calif Sup Ct 1960); MCLL
  • Re Halliwell  261.13; V,6
  • Kaminsky v NYC Police Commr Kennedy  261.14; V,27
  • Dvorman v (Orange Co) School Bd  261.15; VI,15,109
  • Application of Piliero v Murphy, NYC Police Commr  261.16; VII,8,43
  • Re Cecil A Thomas  261.17; IX,90
  • Rosenfield v Malcolm  261.18; X,105—XIII,63; 421 P2d 697 (Calif Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Gersh v Tuckahoe Village Bd  261.19; X,143
  • Tabor v Montgomery Co  261.20; X,143—XIII,63
  • In re Hannon  261.21; X,143—XI,77
  • In re Frank Rotella  261.22; XI,77
  • In re Harold Supriano  261.23; XI,77—XIII,63
  • Partlow v Los Angeles Bd of Civil Service Commrs  261.24; XIII,63; MCLL
  • Vogel v Co of Los Angeles  261.25; XIII,63; 64 CR 409 (Calif Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Hurme v Ashland Co Supervisors  261.27; XIV,58
262. In Teaching (and 24, 267, 281, 342, 571)
  • Dworken v Bd of Educ (Cleveland City School Dist)  (262.a); MCLL
  • In re Lorch and Swadesh (before NY Commr of Educ)  (262.b); NLG
  • In re Teachers Union, Local 555 (UPW) v Bd of Ed (NYC)  (262.c); MCLL
  • DeGroate v Long Beach Unif School Dist  262.1; IV,12—V,27
  • Fullerton Jr College Dist v Phillips  262.9; VII,77—XI,21; 41 CR 608 (DCA 1964)
  • Schewck v Hoyt & Sachs  262.10; IX,90—X,105
  • Halifax Co v Johnson  262.11; X,105
  • Eglash v Detroit Institute of Technology  262.12; X,143—XII,28; 134 NW2d 710 (Mich Sup Ct 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Johnson v Wayne Township Bd of Educ  262.13; XI,77—XIII,63; MCLL
  • In re Broadhead, Gravalos  262.14; XI,78
  • In re Bozman, Kepner  262.15; XI,77
  • Wirin v Los Angeles Bd of Educ  262.16; XII,28—XIII,2
  • Re Pickering  262.17; XIII,63
  • McLaughlin v Tilendis  262.18; XIII,63—XIV,58; rev'd 398 F2d 287 (CA 7 1968)
  • Miller v Noe, Louisville School Bd  262.20; XIII,63
  • Miller v Mosier, Clarksville Bd of Educ  262.20a; XIII,63
  • 12 Teachers v Village Children's School  262.21; XIV,58
  • Beauboef v Delgado College  262.22; XIV,58; 303 FSupp 861 (ED La 1969)
  • Copelin v Giarusso  262.23; XIV,58
  • Karst v Regents of Univ of Calif—Angela Davis, Intervenor  262.24; XIV,59 I ACQ 47; MCLL
  • Johnson v Calif Bd of Educ  262.25; XIV,59
263. As to State Unemployment Insurance Benefits (and 255, 346, 421, 422)
  • Dworken v Collopy  (263.a); MCLL
  • Ekins v Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act  (263.b); MCLL
  • Re Fitzpatrick  (263.c); 255.1; I,11
  • Re Albert  (263.d), 255.2; I,11; ACLU
  • In re Klug  (263.e), 255.3; I,39
  • Baxter v General Motors  (263.f), 255.4; I,74
  • Syrek v Calif Unemployment Insurance Appeals Bd  263.1; II,37—V,52; MCLL
  • Syrek v Calif Unemployment Insurance Appeals Bd  263.1a; III,50—VI,110; 354 P2d 625 (Calif Sup Ct 1960)
  • Communist Party v Catherwood  263.2; II,54—VII,9; 367 US 389 (1961); ACLU
  • Barnes v Admr, Div of Employment Security and Chamber of Commerce  263.3; II,70
  • Jackson v California Unemployment Insurance Bd  263.4; IV,73,95
  • Lewis v Bennett  263.5; VIII,131—X,105; 337 F2d 579 (CA 4 1964)
264. As to State License Applications
  • Torcaso v Watkins  264.1; V,52—VII,9; 367 US 488 (1961)
  • Davis v New York Motor Vehicles Commr Hults  264.2; V,80—VI,15
  • Sabel v Hults  264.3; VI,15—VII,43; 176 NE2d 513 (NY Ct of App 1961); ACLU
  • Re A Robert Kaufman  264.4; VII,108
  • Morgan v Berkeley Realty Bd  264.5; IX,47—XI,21
  • Opinion of the Justices  264.6; XIII,64
265. In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants (and 345, 361, 373)
  • NLG Memo to Comm on Character and Fitness (NY)  (265.aa); MCLL
  • In re Anonymous  (265.d), 110.24; V,106—VII,40
  • In re Welanko  (265.e), 420.2; I,18; 112 A2d 50 (NH Sup Ct 1955)
  • Application of Levy  (265.f), 260.1; I,11; 214 F2d 331 (CA 5 1954), rev'd 348 US 978 (1955); ACLU
  • In re Monaghan  (265.g); 167 A2d 81 (Vt Sup Ct 1961)
  • Sacher v Association of Bar of New York City  (265.h); 206 F2d 358 (CA 2 1953), rev'd 347 US 388 (1954)
  • Braverman v Bar Assn of Baltimore  265.1; II,10; 121 A2d 473 (Md Sup Ct 1956), cd 352 US 830 (1956); NLG
  • Re Braverman  265.2; II,10
  • Florida v Sheiner  265.3; II,10—V,7; 112 So2d 571 (Fla Sup Ct 1959); NLG
  • In re Schlesinger  265.4; II,11—VII,43; 172 A2d 835 (Penn Sup Ct 1961); NLG
  • In re Steinberg  265.5; II,11—VII,108
  • Schware v New Mexico  265.20; II,11—III,8; 353 US 532 (1957); ACLU
  • Konigsberg v California  265.21; II,11—VII,43; rev'd and rem 353 US 552 (1957), aff'd 366 US 36 (1961); MCLL; NLG
  • Patterson v Oregon State Bd of Bar Examiners  265.22; II,11—III,51; rem 353 US 952 (1957); on remand 318 P2d 907 (Ore Sup Ct 1957)
  • Re Anastaplo  265.23; II,70—VII,43; 366 US 82 (1961); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Matter of Knobel  265.24; IV,47,95; 156 NE2d 919 (NY Ct of App 1959)
  • Marshall v State Bar of California  265.25; IV,47—VII,108
  • In re Application of Brooks  265.26; VI,16—VII,9; 355 P2d 840 (Wash Sup Ct 1960), cd 365 US 813 (1961); MCLL
  • Application of Warren  265.27; VII,108; 178 A2d 528 (Conn Sup Ct of Errors 1962)
  • Willner v Comm on Character and Fitness  265.28; VIII,19,130; rev'd 373 US 96 (1963); ACLU
  • North Carolina State Bar v Frazier  265.29; X,106—XI,21
  • In re Terrence Hallinan  265.30; X,21—XIII,64; 421 P2d 76 (Cal Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • March v Calif Comm of Bar Examiners  265.31; XIII, 64; 63 CR 399 (Cal Sup Ct 1967)
  • Law Students Civil Rights Research Council v Wadmond; Wexler v Supreme Court, NY App Div, 1st App Dept  265.32; XIV, 59; 291 FSupp 772 (SD NY 1968), 299 FSupp 117 (SD NY 1969); MCLL
  • Resner v State Bar of California  265.34; XIV, 59; 63 CR 740 (Cal Sup Ct 1967)
266. Through Deprivation of Right to Tax Exemption (and 130, 202)
  • Speiser v Randall  266.1; II, 11—v,7; 357 US 513 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • Prince v San Francisco  266.2; II, 11—III,73; 311 P2d 544 (Calif Sup Ct 1957)
  • Lehrer v Hall  266.3; II, 11
  • Bliss v Quinn  266.4; II, 11—III,74
267. In Private Employment—Teaching (and 24, 262, 281, 342)
  • Lynd v Ill Bd of Governors  267.1; XIII, 64; MCLL
268. In Private Employment—Defense Establishments (and 344)
  • Lester v Parker  268.1; II,11,55; 235 F2d 787 (CA 9 1956); MCLL
  • Graham v Richmond  268.la; III, 74—VIII,20; 272 F2d 517 (CA DC 1959)
  • Homer v Richmond  268.lb; III, 74—VII,43; 292 F2d 719 (CA DC 1961)
  • Kasic v Richmond  268.2; II,12,38
  • Mulzac v Richmond  268.3; II,12,38
  • Dupree v US  268.3a; II,55—V,28; 264 F2d 140 (CA 3 1959), cd 361 US 823 (1959)
  • Hutchin v Rohr Aircraft Co  268.4; II,12,55
  • Re Dressler  268.5; II,38—III,8
  • Dressler v Wisconsin Employment Relations Bd  268.5a; II,72—IV,95; 94 NW2d 609 (Wis Sup Ct 1959)
  • Dressler v Wilson  268.5b; III,8—V,28
  • Dressler v US  268.5c; VI,17—VII,108
  • Greene v Wilson  268.6; II,55
  • Kreznar v Wilson  268.7; II,55—VIII,20
  • Webb v US  268.8; II,72—III,51
  • Bessell v Clyde  268.9; III,8—IV,47; 360 F2d 240 (CA 3 1958)
  • Berman v Natl Maritime Union  268.10; III, 51—V,52; ACLU
  • Lundquist v Marine Engineers Beneficial Assn Local 97  268.11; III,51—VIII,75; 208 CA2d 390 (Calif Dist Ct of App 1962)
  • Greene v McElroy  268.12; III,51—IV,95; 360 US 474 (1959); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Greene v US  268.12a; IX,90; rev'd and rem 376 US 149 (1964)
  • Taylor v McElroy  268.13; IV,47,96; vac & rem 360 US 709 (1959)
  • Cafeteria & Rest Workers v McElroy  268.14; IV,47—VII,43; aff'd 367 US 886 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Spector v McElroy  268.15; IV,47—V,53; 269 F2d 242 (CA DC 1959)
  • Klimas v Sperry Gyroscope Co  268.16; IV,47,96
  • Haber v Gates  268.17, 251.31; V,26—VI,17
  • Margolin v US  268.18; VII,9—XIII,64
  • Colman v Richmond  268.19; VIII,75,100
  • McBride v Roland  268.20; X,106—XIV,59; 248 FSupp 459 (SD NY 1968), 369 F2d 65 (CA 2 1968), cd 387 US 932 (1967); 405 F2d 1057 (CA 2 1968)
  • Re Kaiser Employee  268.21; XIII,64
  • Schneider v Smith  268.22; XIII,64—XIV,59; 263 FSupp 496 (WD Wash 1967), rev'd 390 US 17 (1968)
  • Shoultz v Laird  268.23; XIV,60; I ACQ 34; 282 FSupp 315 (ND Cal 1968), rev'd 413 F2d 868 (CA 9 1969), cd 396 US 962 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
269. In Private Employment-Other
  • Black v Cutter Laboratories  (269.a), 250.1; I,11,93; 351 US 292 (1956); MCLL; ACLU
  • Faulk v AWARE  269.1; II,12—X,143; 231 NYS2d 270 (NY Sup Ct 1962), aff'd 244 NYS2d 259 (Sup Ct App Div), 253 NYS2d 990 (NY Ct of App), cd 380 US 916, 989 (1965); MCLL
  • Iverson v Seattle Gas Co  269.la; III,30—IV,48
  • Allen v Los Angeles Co Dist Council of Carpenters  269.2; II,12—V,53; 337 P2d 457 (Calif Sup Ct 1959), cd 361 US 936 (1960)
  • Intl Assn of Machinists v Friedman  269.3; III,30—IV,14; 252 F2d 846 (CA DC 1958), cd 357 US 926 (1958)
  • New Orleans Newspaper Co v The Item Co  269.4; III,52—IV,96; 256 F2d 855 (CA 5 1958), cd 358 US 867 (1958)
  • Asselin v General Motors Corp and UAW-CIO  269.5; IV,15,48
  • Re Joseph Papp  269.6; IV,15
  • Re Brookside Industries  (269.b), 269.6; VII,43; 49 LRRM 1420 (NLRB 1962)
  • Anderson v Carpenters Union  269.7; XI,21; 99 Labor Law Rep 2 (DC Minn 1965)
  • Re Anderson and Twin City Carpenters Council  269.7a; XI,21; 99 Labor Law Rep 2 (DC Minn 1965)
  • East Meadow Community Concert Assn v East Meadow Bd of Educ  269.8; XI,78—XII,28; 268 NYS2d 221 (Sup Ct 1966), 269 NYS2d 542 (Sup Ct App Div 1966), 271 NYS2d 289 (Ct of App 1966), rev'd 272 NYS2d 341 (Ct of App 1966), 273 NYS2d 736 (Sup Ct App Div 1966), 278 NYS2d 393 (Ct of App 1967)
  • NLRB v Ritchie Mfg Co  269.9; XI,78—XII,28; 354 F2d 90 (CA 8 1965)
  • Re Arthur Elliot  269.10; XI,78
  • Re Roscoe Proctor  269.11; XI,78; MCLL
  • Bridgewood v Local 707, UAW  269.12; XIV,60; I ACQ 42; MCLL
  • Wetherton v Martin Produce, Growers Farm Assn  269.13; XIV,60; MCLL
270. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR NONDISCLOSURE (and 330)
271. Before Congressional Committees (and 222, 330)
  • Josephson v US  (271.a); 74 FSupp 958 (1947), 165 F2d 82 (CA 2 1947), cd 333 US 838 (1958); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Eisler v USA  (271.b); 170 F2d 273 (CA DC 1948), cd 337 US 958 (1949); ACLU; NLG
  • Lawson v US  (271.c); 176 F2d 49 (CA DC 1949), cd 339 US 934 (1950); ACLU; NLG
  • E Dennis v US  (271.d); aff'd 339 US 162 (1950); NLG
  • Trumbo v USA  (271.e); 176 F2d 49 (CA DC 1949), cd 339 US 934 (1950); ACLU; NLG
  • George Marshall v US  (271.f); 176 F2d 473 (CA DC 1949), cd 339 US 933 (1950); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • US v Fleischman  (271.g); rev'd 339 US 349 (1950); MCLL
  • US v Bryan  (271.h); rev'd 339 US 323 (1950); MCLL
  • Morford v US  (271.i); rev'd 339 US 258 (1950); MCLL
  • In re Leonard Mins  (271.j); MCLL
  • US v Furry  (271.k), 310.2; I,14,95
  • US v Kamin  (271.L), 310.3; I,14,57; 136 FSupp 791 (DC Mass 1956); MCLL
  • US v Arguimbau  (271.m), 310.5; I,14,57
  • US v Keeney  (271.n), 310.8; I,14; 218 F2d 843 (CA DC 1954)
  • Pauling v Eastland  (271.o), 271.a; V,81—VII,10; 288 F2d 126 (CA DC 1960), cd 364 US 900 (1960); ACLU
  • US v Lamont  271.1; II,12,38; 236 F2d 312 (CA 2 1956); MCLL
  • US v Unger  271.2; II,12,38; 236 F2d 312 (CA 2 1956); NLG
  • US v Shadowitz  271.3; II,12,38; 236 F2d 312 (CA 2 1956)
  • O'Connor v US  271.4; II,12,38; 135 FSupp 590 (DC DC 1955), rev'd 240 F2d 404 (CA DC 1956)
  • US v C Davis  271.5; II,12—V,28; 269 F2d 357 (CA 6 1959), cd 361 US 919 (1959); MCLL
  • US v Watson  271.6; II,12—VI,17; 280 F2d 689 (CA DC 1960)
  • Barenblatt v US  271.7; II,12—V,7; 360 US 109 (1959); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • US v Lorch  271.8; II,13—III,30
  • US v Russell  271.9; II,13—X,34; rev'd 369 US 749 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Deutch v US  271.10; II,13—VIII,20; rev'd 367 US 456 (1961); MCLL
  • Sacher v US  271.11; II,13—III,74; rev'd and rem 356 US 576 (1958); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Gojack v US  271.12; II,13—XII,29; 280 F2d 678 (CA DC 1960), 369 US 749 (1962); 348 F2d 355 (CA DC 1965), rev'd 384 US 702 (1966); MCLL
  • US v Metcalf  271.13; II,13—VI,18
  • Watkins v US  271.14; II,13,72; rev'd and rem 354 US 178 (1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Shelton v US  271.15; II,38—IX,48; 369 US 749 (1962); 327 F2d 601 (CA DC 1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Whitman  271.16; II,39—IX,48; rev'd 369 US 749 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Knowles v US  271.17; II,39—VI,18; 280 F2d 696 (CA DC 1960)
  • Peck v US  271.18; II,39—III,9; 149 FSupp 238, 154 FSupp 603 (DC DC 1957)
  • Price v US  271.19; II,39—XI,21; 280 F2d 715 (CA DC), rev'd 369 US 749 (1962); ACLU
  • US v Liveright  271.20; II,39—XI,21; 280 F2d 708 (CA DC 1960), rev'd 369 US 749 (1962); 347 F2d 473 (CA DC 1965); MCLL
  • US v Nathan  271.21; II,56—III,31; 238 F2d 401 (CA 7 1956), cd 353 US 910 (1957)
  • US v Miller  271.22; II,56—IV,48; 259 F2d 187 (CA DC 1958); ACLU
  • US v Sullivan  271.23; II,56—VII,44; MCLL
  • US v Yarus a/k/a Tyne  271.24; II,56—VII,44
  • US v Seeger  271.25; II,56—VII,78; 303 F2d 478 (CA 2 1962); MCLL
  • US v Kling  271.26; II,56—III,31; 252 F2d 791 (CA 8 1958)
  • US v Hartman  271.27; III,75—VIII,131; 370 US 724 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Grumman  271.28; IV,16—IX,48; rev'd 370 US 288 (1962); ACLU
  • US v Silber  271.29; IV,16—IX,48; rev'd 370 US 717 (1962); ACLU
  • US v Feuer  271.30; IV,16—VI,19
  • Wilkinson v US  271.31; IV,48—VII,44; aff'd 365 US 399 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Braden v US  271.32; IV,48—VII,10; aff'd 365 US 431 (1961); ACLU
  • Yellin v US  271.33; IV,97—IX,90; 287 F2d 292 (CA 7 1961), rev'd 374 US 109 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Lehrer  271.34; IV,97—IX,48; MCLL
  • US v Malis  271.35; IV,97—IX,14
  • US v Samter  271.36; IV,97—IX,14
  • US v Turoff  271.37; IV,97—VI,10; 291 F2d 864 (CA 2 1961); MCLL
  • US v Ingerman  271.38; IV,97—V,29
  • US v Goldfine  271.39; IV,97—V,81; 174 FSupp 255 (DC DC 1959)
  • US v O'Connor  271.40; V,8—XI,21; ACLU
  • US v Rosenkrantz  271.41; V,8,29; MCLL
  • US v Popper  271.42; V,29—VII,109; 306 F2d 290 (CA DC 1962)
  • Wheeldin v US  271.43; V,29—VII,10; 283 F2d 535 (CA 9 1960), cd 366 US 977 (1961); MCLL
  • US v Alexander  271.44; V,29—VI,19
  • Hutcheson v US  271.45; V,54—VII,109; aff'd 369 US 599 (1962)
  • US v High  271.46; V,81
  • US v Tobin  271.47; V,81—VII,109; 306 F2d 270 (CA DC 1962), cd 371 US 902 (1962)
  • US v Cuesta  271.48; VIII,21
  • US v Nixon, Wilson, Allen  271.49; X,106—XII,29; 369 F2d 198 (CA DC 1966); MCLL
  • Stamler, Hall v Willis, Ashbrook, HUAC  271.50; X,143—XIV,60; I ACQ 42; 371 F2d 413 (CA 7 1966), 287 FSupp 734 (ND Ill 1968), dism'd 393 US 217 (1968); 415 F2d 1365 (CA 7 1969), vac 393 US 407 (1969); MCLL
  • US v Shelton  271.51; XI,78—XIII,65
  • Krebs v Ashbrook  271.52; XII,29—XIV,61; 275 FSupp 111 (DC DC 1967), 407 F2d 306 (CA DC 1968), cd 393 US 1026 (1969); MCLL
  • Davis v Willis  271.53; XIV,61; MCLL
  • Young v Willis  271.54; XIV,61; MCLL
  • Am Fed of Teachers, Local 1570 v Permanent Subcomm on Investigation of Gov't Operations Comm, US Senate  271.55; XIV,61
272. Before State Committees (and 204, 213, 223, 332)
  • Teachers Union of New York v Joint Leg Comm to Investigate Educational Syst of New York; In re Charles Hendley  (272.a); MCLL
  • A Jones v Massachusetts  (272.b); MCLL
  • New York v Schappes  (272.c); MCLL
  • In re George Pappas  (272.d); MCLL
  • E Nelson v Wyman  (272.e); MCLL
  • Sweezy v New Hampshire  272.1; II,13—IV,48; 354 US 234 (1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Uphaus v New Hampshire  272.2; II,13—VI,59; 360 US 72 (1959); 159 A2d 160 (NH Sup Ct 1960), app dism'd 364 US 388 (1960); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • DeGregory v Wyman  272.3; II,39—VII,44; 137 A2d 512 (NH Sup Ct 1957), 360 US 717 (1959); 162 A2d 612, 169 A2d 1 (NH Sup Ct 1961), aff'd 368 US 19 (1961)
  • DeGregory v New Hampshire  272.3a; IX,91—XII,29; 209 A2d 712 (NH Sup Ct 1966), rev'd 383 US 825 (1966)
  • NAACP v Ames  272.4; II,56—VII,44
  • NAACP v Committee  272.4a; VII,10—IX,48; 133 SE2d 540 (Va Sup Ct of App 1963)
  • NAACP v Comm on Offenses Against the Administration of Justice  272.5; III,9—IV,17; 101 SE2d 631 (Va Sup Ct 1958), cg, vac as moot 358 US 40 (1958)
  • Virginia Legislative Comm on Racial Activities v Brown  272.6; III,31—IV,17
  • Scull v Virginia  272.7; III,52—IV,98; 359 US 344 (1959); MCLL; ACLU
  • Perry v Florida Legislative Comm  272.8; III,52—IV,98; 106 So2d 198 (Fla Sup Ct 1958)
  • Gibson v Florida Legislative Investigating Comm  272.9; IV,48,98; 108 So2d 729 (Fla Sup Ct 1958), cd 360 US 919 (1959); MCLL
  • Rev Gibson v Florida Legislative Investigation Comm  272.10; V,81—IX,48; 126 So2d 129 (Fla Sup Ct 1961), rev'd 372 US 539 (1963); MCLL
  • Rev Graham v Florida Legislative Investigating Comm  272.11; VI,20,60; 126 So2d 133 (Fla Sup Ct 1960); MCLL
  • Jordan v Hutcheson  272.12; VII,10; MCLL
  • Virginia Comm on Offenses Against the Administration of Justice v Rev Harris  272.13; VII,78
  • Fuentes, McRae, Birnbaum v Fischel  272.14; X,106; MCLL
273. Before Legal and Administrative Tribunals (and 333)
  • US v Ekins  (273.a), 320.5; I,75
  • US v Witkovich  273.1; II,13,73; aff'd 353 US 194 (1957)
  • US v Keller  273.2; II,13,73
  • Sentner v Barton (Colarelli)  273.4; II,14,73; aff'd 353 US 963 (1957)
  • Kentucky v Rhine  273.5, 273.4; II,39,73; 303 SW2d 301 (Ky Ct of App 1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Brunner v Orange Co Super Ct  273.6; IV,49,74; 335 P2d 484 (Calif Sup Ct 1959)
  • Re Rev Hughes  273.7; VII,20
274. For Refusal to Produce Records
  • Green v US  (274.a); MCLL
  • Field v USA  (274.b); cd 332 US 851 (1948); MCLL; ACLU
  • Patterson v US  (274.c), 370.1; I,16; 75 SCt 256 (1954); 219 F2d 659 (CA 2 1955); MCLL
  • US v Grossman  (274.d), 340.7; I,16,95; 229 F2d 775 (CA DC 1956)
  • Application of NAACP  (274.e); MCLL
  • Flaxer v US  274.1; II,14—IV,98; rev'd 358 US 147 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Baxter  274.2; II,14—III,75
  • McPhaul v US  274.3; II,39—VII,11; 364 US 372 (1960); MCLL
  • In re Publishers New Press  274.4; XI,79
280. CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONDISCLOSURE (and 295)
281. By Teachers (and 24, 223, 262, 342, 571)
  • Bradley v New York University  (281.a); MCLL
  • Miller v Wheeler  (281.b); MCLL
  • Tolman v Underhill  (281.c); MCLL
  • Bd of Public Educ, Sch Dist of Philadelphia v August  (281.d); MCLL
  • Opinion of Justices of Mass Sup Jud Ct  (281.e), 460.1; I,20,97; 126 NE2d 100 (Mass Sup Ct 1955), 127 NE2d 663 (Mass Sup Ct 1955)
  • H B Davis v Univ of Kansas City  (281.f), 460.2; I,20; 129 FSupp 716 (WD Mo 1955)
  • Bd of Educ of Los Angeles v Eisenberg  (281.g), 460.4; I,20,78; 277 P2d 943 (Calif DCA 1954)
  • Steinmetz v California State Bd of Educ  (281.h), 460.5; I,20,97; aff'd 285 P2d 617 (Calif Sup Ct 1955); ACLU
  • Bd of Educ of Los Angeles v Cooper  (281.i), 460.9; I,78,97; 289 P2d 80 (Calif DCA 1955)
  • Nostrand v Little  (281.1), 280.1; II,14—VII,79; 362 US 60 (1960); dism'd 368 US 436 (1962); ACLU
  • Pickus v Chicago Bd of Educ  (281.2), 280.2; II,14,74; 138 NE2d 532 (Ill Sup Ct 1956); ACLU
  • Hughes v Bd of Higher Educ of City of New York  (281.3), 280.4; II,14—IV,74; 130 NE2d 638 (NY Ct of App 1955), 203 NYS2d 943 (NY Sup Ct 1960)
  • New York Bd of Educ v Allen  (281.4), 280.5; II,39—V,82; 160 NE2d 60 (NY Ct of App 1959); NLG
  • Adler v Bd of Educ of New York  (281.5); aff'd 342 US 485 (1952); ACLU
  • Nash v Bd of Educ of City of New York  (281.5a), 280.5a; V,29
  • Re Nash  281.5b; VI,21—X,107
  • Adler v NYC Bd of Educ  281.5c; VI,60—VIII,100; MCLL
  • Carr v Young  (281.j), 280.13, 204.13a; V,25—VI,21; decided with
  • Shelton v Tucker  (281.k), 280.14, 204.13; IV,92—VII,11; 174 FSupp 351 (ED Ark), 331 SW2d 701 (Ark Sup Ct), rev'd 364 US 479 (1960)
  • Re John Martinson  (281.6), 120.22; VI,56
  • Collins v Huntington Beach Union High School Dist  281.12; V,54—VIII,22; 21 CR 56 (Dist Ct of App 1962), cd 371 US 904 (1962)
  • Cramp v Bd of Pub Inst Orange Co, Fla  281.15; VI,22—VIII,23; 368 US 278 (1961); on rem 137 So2d 828 (Fla Sup Ct 1962); ACLU
  • Macks v California Bd of Educ  281.16; VI,60—XIII,66; 36 CR 677 (DCA 1964); MCLL
  • In re Patrick Hancock  281.17; VII,45—VIII,76
  • Soler v Bd of Pub Educ, School Dist of Phila  281.18; VII,79,110; 176 A2d 653 (Penn Sup Ct 1961), cd 370 US 919 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Baggett v Bullitt  (281.L), 281.1a; VII,109—X,22; rev'd 377 US 360 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Dulgov v Bd of Educ (Tucson)  281.19; IX,48—X,35; MCLL
  • Starbuck v Bd of Regents (NY State)  281.20; IX,91—X,107; MCLL
  • Keyishian v Bd of Regents, Univ of New York  281.20a; X,107—XIII,66; 345 F2d 236 (CA 2 1965), 255 FSupp 981 (WD NY 1966), rev'd 385 US 589 (1967); MCLL
  • Georgia Conference of AAUP v Regents of Univ of Georgia  281.21; X,22—XIV,61; 246 FSupp 553 (ND Ga 1965); MCLL
  • Ehrenreich v Londerholm  281.22; XII,29—XIV,62; 273 FSupp 178 (DC Kan 1967)
  • Whitehill v Elkins  281.23; XII,29—XIII,66; 258 FSupp 589 (DC Md 1966), rev'd 389 US 54 (1967); MCLL
  • Plaintiff v Nebraska  281.24; XII,30—XIII,66; MCLL
  • Pedlosky v Massachusetts  281.25; XII,30—XIII,67
  • Brush v Ore Bd of Higher Educ  281.26; XII,30—XIV,62; 422 P2d 268 (Ore Sup Ct 1966)
  • Aronson v Univ of Calif Regents  281.27; XIII,67—XIV,62; MCLL; ACLU
  • Hosack v Smiley  281.28; XIII,67; 276 FSupp 876 (DC Colo 1967), aff'd 390 US 744 (1967)
  • Thalberg v Bd of Trs (Univ of Illinois); Krehbiel v Bd of Educ (Morgan Co, Ill)  281.29; XIV,62; 309 FSupp 630 (ND Ill 1969); MCLL
  • Ball v Los Angeles Bd of Educ  281.30; XIV,62
  • Haskett v W E Washington  281.31; XIV,62; I ACQ 19; 294 FSupp 912 (DC DC 1968); MCLL
  • McManmon v California State Dept of Educ  281.32; XIV,62
  • Bullough v San Fernando Valley State College  281.33; XIV,62
  • Gilmore v James  281.34, 261.26; XIII,63—XIV,62; I ACQ 42; 274 FSupp 75 (ND Tex 1967), aff'd 389 US 572 (1968)
  • Hartman v Romney  281.35; XIV,62; 294 FSupp 794 (DC Mass 1968); MCLL
282. By Others (and 343, 344)
  • Gerende v Bd of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore City  (282.a); aff'd 341 US 56 (1951); MCLL
  • Barsky v Bd of Regents of State of New York  (282.b); 111 NE2d 222 (NY Ct of App 1952), aff'd 347 US 442 (1954)
  • Allen v Office Employees Intl Union  (282.1), 280.8; III,31—VI,112; 329 P2d 205 (Wash Sup Ct 1958)
  • Re RCA  (282.2), 280.10; III,31
  • United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, Local 259 v Worthington Corp  (282.3), 280.6; II,39,56; 236 F2d 364 (CA 5 1956)
  • Wieman v Updegraff  (282.4), 280.7; II,56; rev'd 344 US 183 (1952)
  • Wirin v Ostly  (282.5), 280.11; IV,49—VII,44; 13 CR 31 (Calif DCA 1961), cd 368 US 952 (1962)
  • Sublett v Thyberg  282.6; IX,91
  • Hofberg v County Civ Serv Commn  282.12; X,107—XIII,67; 258 CA2d 433 (Calif DCA 1968)
  • Krause v Elkins  282.13; XI,79
  • Application of Walter Marvin, Jr  282.16; XIII,67—XIV,63; I ACQ 31; 234 A2d 408 (NJ Sup Ct 1968), cd 396 US 821 (1969); MCLL
  • Coxe v Osser  282.17; XIII,67—XIV,63; MCLL
285. BILLS OF ATTAINDER
  • US v Brown  244.1; VI,109—XI,20; 334 F2d 488 (CA 9 1964), aff'd 381 US 437 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
290. PENALTIES FOR FALSE DISCLOSURE
291. Under Taft-Hartley Oath (and 203, 244)
  • American Communications Assn v Douds  (291.a); aff'd 339 US 382 (1950); ACLU
  • Hupman v US  (291.b), 240.1; I,10,73; 219 F2d 243 (CA 6 1955), cd 349 US 953 (1955)
  • US v Neff and Valentino  (291.c), 240.2; I,10
  • Jencks v US  291.1; II,14,74; rev'd 353 US 657 (1957)
  • Gold v US  291.2; II,15,74; rev'd and rem 352 US 985 (1957); MCLL
  • Bryson v US  291.3; II,15—III,53; 243 F2d 837 (CA 9 1957), cd 355 US 817 (1957); MCLL
  • Bryson v US  291.3a; XIV,63; I ACQ 27; 238 F2d 657 (CA 9 1956), cd 355 US 817 (1957); 265 F2d 9 (CA 9 1959), cd 360 US 919 (1959); 403 F2d 340 (CA 9 1968), aff'd 396 US 64 (1969)
  • Travis v US  291.4; II,15—VI,60; rev'd 364 US 631 (1961); MCLL
  • Lohman v US  291.5; II,15—V,54; 266 F2d 3 (CA 6 1959), cd 361 US 923 (1959)
  • US v Killian  291.6; III,10—VIII,100; rev'd and rem 368 US 231 (1961)
  • US v Fred and Marie Haug  291.7; II,40—VII, 110; MCLL
  • US v Fisher  291.8; IV,18,49; 254 F2d 302 (CA 9 1958), cd 358 US 895 (1958)
  • US v West  291.20; II,40—VI,112; 274 F2d 885 (CA 6 1960), cd 365 US 811 (1961); MCLL
292. On Government Security Questionnaires
  • US v Giarraputo  (292.a), 222.2; I,72,92
  • US v McDaniel  292.1; II,15—III,10
  • Ogden v US  292.2; V,82—IX,29; 303 F2d 724 (CA 9 1962), 323 F2d 818 (CA 9 1963), cd 376 US 973 (1964)
  • Re Strasburger  292.3; XIII,67—XIV,63
  • Minnesota v Forichette  292.4; XII,30—XIV,63; 156 NW2d 93 (Minn Sup Ct 1968)
293. In Miscellaneous Cases
  • US v Hiss  (293.a); 185 F2d 822 (CA 2 1950), cd 340 US 948 (1951); 201 F2d 372 (CA 2 1953), cd 345 US 942 (1953); MCLL
  • Matusow v US  (293.b), 545.2; I,23,61; 229 F2d 335 (CA 5 1956); MCLL
  • Matusow v US  (293.c), 545.3; I,23; aff'd 244 F2d 532 (CA 2 1957), cd 354 US 942 (1957); MCLL
  • Ohio v Hamilton  (293.d); MCLL
  • US v Lattimore  (293.e), 380.1; I,16; 215 F2d 847 (CA DC 1954), 232 F2d 334 (CA DC 1955); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Natvig  (293.f), 545.1; I,23,99; 236 F2d 694 (CA DC 1956), cd 352 US 1014 (1957)
  • NY v Carman  293.1; IV,49; 160 NE2d 484 (NY Ct of App 1959)
  • US v Hucks  293.2; VI,112—VII,110; 301 F2d 548 (CA DC 1962), cd 371 US 835 (1962); MCLL
  • Bd of Educ (Los Angeles) v Sloat  293.3; VII,110—XIV,63; MCLL
  • Wellbaum v State Bd of Educ (Los Angeles)  293.4; IX,48—XI,22
  • Ohio v Donald Freeman  293.5; X,22
295. RIGHT OF PRIVACY (and 301, 302, 303, 421, 490, 578)
  • Carr v Watkins  (295.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Finger-printing (UAW-CIO, 1942)  (295.b); MCLL
  • Housh v Peth  (295.c), 810.1; I,106; 133 NE2d 340 (Sup Ct Ohio 1956)
  • Yoeckel v Samonig  (295.d), 810.2; I,106; 75 NW2d 925 (Wisc Sup Ct 1956)
  • Meetze v Associated Press  (295.e), 90.1; II,51; 95 SE2d 606 (SC Sup Ct 1956)
  • Nedrow v So California Music Co  295.1; V,82—VI,87
  • Fedl Trade Comm v Dilger  295.2; VI,61,87; 276 F2d 739 (CA 7 1960), cd 364 US 882 (1960)
  • St Regis Paper Co v US  295.3; VI,112—VII,79; aff'd 368 US 208 (1961)
  • Hall v Graybill  295.4; VII,11—VIII,76
  • Time, Inc v Hill  295.5; VII,79—XIII,68; 240 NYS2d 286 (NY Sup Ct), 260 NYS2d 7 (NY Ct of App), rem 385 US 374 (1967); MCLL
  • American Sunbathing Assn and Tennessee Outdoor Club v Tennessee; Roberts v Gov Clement  295.6; XI,22
  • Telephone Answering Service v Beverly Hills  295.8; XI,79—XIII,68
  • Julian Messner, Inc v Spahn  295.9; XI,79—XIII,68; 274 NYS2d 877 (NY Ct of App), 387 US 239 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Minnaman v Producers of "Mondo Cane,"  295.10; XII,30
  • Leopold v Levin  295.11; XIII,68—XIV,64
  • Hamberger v Eastman  295.12; XIII,68; 206 A2d 239 (NH Sup Ct 1965)
  • Pare v Donovan  295.13; XIII,68
  • Lamont v Commr of Motor Vehicles, R L Polk and Co  295.14; XIII,68—XIV,65; 269 FSupp 880 (ED NY 1967), aff'd 386 F2d 449 (CA 2 1967), cd 391 US 915 (1968); MCLL
  • California v Dock of the Bay  295.15; XIV,64
  • Citizens for Parental Rights v San Mateo Co Bd of Educ  295.16; XIV,64
  • Carter v US  295.17; XIV,64; vac and rem 407 F2d 1238 (CA DC 1968)
  • Casey v Collectors Publications, Ltd  295.18; XIV,64; MCLL
  • Erwin v Beck  295.19; XIV,64
  • Adams v Palmieri  295.20; XIV,64
  • Arizona Civil Liberties Union v Tucson School Resource Officer Program  295.22; XIV,64
  • Caro v Marin Co  295.23; XIV,64
  • Massachusetts v Weiss  295.24; XIV,64; 37 USLW 2418 (Mass Sup Ct 1969)
  • Mason v Police Commissioner  295.25; XIV,64; MCLL
  • Mindel v US Civil Service Commn  295.26; XIV,64; 312 FSupp 485 (ND Cal 1970); MCLL
  • Goldman v Life  295.27; XIV,65
  • Travis v Marin Co Sheriff's Dept  295.28; XIV,65
295.100. BIRTH CONTROL
  • Poe v Ullman  (295.100a), 490.6; III,82—VII,17; 367 US 497 (1961)
  • Kinney Bldg Drugstore v New Jersey  (295.100b), 490.6a; IV,81
  • Trubek v Ullman, Conn State's Atty  (295.100c), 490.6a, 490.6b; V,90—VI,67; 165 A2d 158 (Conn Sup Ct 1960)
  • Rev Willard and Rev Livingston v Ullman  (295.100d), 490.6b, 490.6c; V,90—VI,32
  • Connecticut v Griswold, Buxton  (295.100e), 490.6d; VII,51—XI,36; 200 A2d 479 (Conn Sup Ct 1964), 381 US 479 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Planned Parenthood Comm of Phoenix v Maricopa Co  (295.100e), 490.15; VI,32—VIII,83; 375 P2d 719 (Ariz Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
  • New York v Baird  (295.101), 295.7; X,22—XI,79
  • California v Belous  295.108; XIV,65; rev'd 458 P2d 194 (Calif Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
  • Jessin v Shasto Co  295.109; XIV,65; 274 CA2d 737 (Cal DCA 1969); MCLL
  • O'Beirne v O'Beirne  295.110; XIV,65
  • California v Gurner, Maginnis  295.111, 59.84; XIII,28—XIV,65; I ACQ 33,34; MCLL; ACLU
  • New Jersey v Baird  295.112, 59.93; XIII,28—XIV,65; rev'd 235 A2d 673 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
295.200. HOMOSEXUALITY
  • Brass, Teper v Hoberman  295.201; XIV,65; I ACQ 52; 295 FSupp 358 (SD NY 1968); MCLL
II. DUE PROCESS AND RELATED RIGHTS (Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments) (300-499)

300. SEARCHES AND SEIZURES (and 295)
301. By Electronic Eavesdropping (and 295)
  • Mitchell v Truck Drivers Union  (301.a); 191 FSupp 229 (ED Mich 1961)
  • California v Cahan  (301.b), 511.3; I,21; 282 P2d 905 (Calif Sup Ct 1955)
  • New York v Broady  (301.c), 511.1; I,21,60
  • Pennsylvania v Chaitt  (301.d), 511.2; I,21,43; 112 A2d 379 (Penn Sup Ct 1955), cd 350 US 829 (1955); ACLU
  • Sugden v US  (301.e), 511.5; I,60,98; aff'd 351 US 916 (1956)
  • US v Costello  301.1; II,15; ACLU
  • California v Tarantino  301.2; II,15; 290 P2d 505 (Calif Sup Ct 1955)
  • Wirin v Parker  301.3; II,15—III,10; 313 P2d 844 (Calif Sup Ct 1957)
  • Pennsylvania v Voci  301.4; II,15—IV,99; 143 A2d 652 (Penn Sup Ct 1958), cd 358 US 885 (1958); ACLU
  • Costello v US  301.5; II,40—III,76; 255 F2d 876 (CA 2 1958), cd 357 US 937 (1958)
  • Benanti v US  301.6; II,75—IV,99; rev'd and rem 355 US 96 (1957)
  • Lanza v New York  301.7; III,11—VII,110; aff'd 370 US 139 (1962); ACLU
  • Rathbun v US  301.8; III,32; aff'd 355 US 107 (1957)
  • Memorandum by Justice Hofstadter  301.9; III,32
  • New Jersey v Giardina  301.10; III,32
  • Silverman v US  301.11; V,9—VI,113; rev'd 365 US 505 (1961)
  • Pugach v Dollinger  301.12; V,30—VII,45; aff'd 365 US 458 (1961); ACLU
  • Re Application by Dist Atty Hogan  301.13; V,55
  • New York v O'Rourke  301.14; V,55
  • Husband v Wife  301.15; VI,61
  • Washington v Cory  301.16; VII,12—VIII,132; 382 P2d 1019 (Wash Sup Ct 1963); ACLU
  • Massachusetts v Dougherty  301.17; VII,46,80; 178 NE2d 584 (Sup Jud Ct 1961)
  • Carnes v US  301.18; VII,46; 295 F2d 598 (CA 5 1961)
  • New York v Russo  301.19; VII,46
  • US v Harris  301.20; VII,46—XII,31
  • New York v McCall  301.21; VII,46
  • Dinan v New York  301.22; VIII,24,76; 183 NE2d 689 (Ct of App 1962), cd 371 US 877 (1962)
  • Berger v New York  301.23; X,36—XIII,69; 272 NYS2d 782 (Ct of App 1966), rev'd 388 US 41 (1967); MCLL
  • New York v Scandifia, Grossman  301.24; X,107—XIII,69; 245 NYS2d 679 (Ct of App NY 1966)
  • New York v Robles  301.25; X,107—XIV,67; 287 NYS2d 100 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1968)
  • US v Guglielmo  301.26; XI,80—XIV,67; 245 FSupp 534 (DC ND Ill 1966), aff'd 371 F2d 176 (CA 7 1966)
  • New York v Habel  301.27; XII,31—XIII,70; 219 NE2d 183 (NY Ct of App 1967), app dism'd 388 US 451 (1967); MCLL
  • New York v Fiedler  301.29; XIII,70
  • US v Coplon  301.30; XIII,70; 91 FSupp 867 (DC DC 1950), 185 F2d 629 (CA 2 1950), 191 F2d 749 (CA 2 1951), cd 342 US 926 (1952); ACLU
  • California v Hughes  301.31; XIII,70; 241 CA2d 622 (DCA 1966)
  • Uniformed Sanitation Men Assn v Commr of Sanitation  301.32; XIII,70—XIV,67; 383 F2d 364 (CA 2 1967), rev'd 392 US 280 (1968)
  • Taglianetti v US  301.33; XIII,70—XIV,67;274 FSupp 220 (DC RI), 398 F2d 558 (CA 1 1966), aff'd 394 US 316 (1969); MCLL
  • New York v Broady  301.34; XIII,70—XIV,67
  • Katz v US  301.35; XIII,70,71; 369 F2d 130 (CA 9 1966), rev'd 389 US 347 (1967)
  • Roberts v US  301.36; XIII,71; 342 F2d 147 (CA 5 1965), rev'd 389 US 18 (1967)
  • US v Baker  301.37; XIII,71; 262 FSupp 657 (DC DC 1966)
  • Hoffa v US  301.38; XIII,71; 367 F2d 698 (CA 7 1966), vac and rem 387 US 231 (1967)
  • Balistrieri v US  301.39; XIV,68; 403 F2d 472 (CA 7 1968), cd 394 US 985 (1969); vac and rem 395 US 710 (1969)
  • Dellinger v Mitchell, Hoover  301.40; XIV,68; MCLL
  • US v DeCavalcante  301.41; XIV,68
  • US v Roy Cohn  301.42; XIV,68
  • US v Ferrara  301.43; XIV,68
  • New York v William Gibson  301.44; XIV,68; aff'd 298 NYS2d 496 (NY Ct of App 1969)
  • Lee v Florida  301.45; XIV,68; 191 So2d 84 (DCA Fla 1966), rev'd 392 US 378 (1968)
  • Giordano v US  301.46; XIV,68; 385 F2d 988 (CA 6 1965), vac and rem 394 US 310 (1969)
  • Desist v US  301.47; XIV,68; 277 FSupp 690 (SD NY 1967), 384 F2d 889 (CA 2 1968)
  • Kaiser v New York  301.48; XIV,68; 282 NYS2d 207 (NY Sup Ct), 286 NYS2d 801 (NY Ct of App), aff'd 394 US 280 (1969)
  • Kolod v US  301.49; aff'd 371 F2d 983 (CA 10 1967), cd 389 US 834 (1967), rev'd 390 US 136 (1968)
  • Ragen v California  301.50; XIV,69; 262 CA2d 392 (DCA 1968), cd 393 US 1000 (1968)
  • US v White  301.51; XIV,69; 405 F2d 838 (CA 7 1969)
302. In Other Federal Criminal Cases
  • In re Six Companies  (302.a), 515.2; I,79
  • US v Camara  (302.b); 271 F2d 787 (CA 7 1959)
  • Hinton v Eastland  302.1; II,15—III,32
  • Wisconsin v Kroening  302.2; II,57; 79 NW2d 810 (Wisc Sup Ct 1956)
  • Kremen v US  302.3; II,75—III,11; 353 US 346 (1957)
  • Draper v US  302.4; III,33—IV,99; 358 US 307 (1959); ACLU
  • Blackford v US  302.5; III,33,76; 247 F2d 745 (CA 9 1957), cd 356 US 914 (1958)
  • Local 107 v McClellan  302.6; III,33—IV,99; cd 358 US 947 (1959)
  • Weise v US  302.7; III,33,76; 251 F2d 867 (CA 9 1958), cd 357 US 936 (1958)
  • Joines v US  302.8; III,76—IV,99; 246 F2d 278 (CA 3), 258 F2d 471 (CA 3 1958), vac & rem 357 US 573 (1958), cd 358 US 880 (1958)
  • US v Abel  302.9; III,76—V,83; 362 US 217 (1960)
  • Hanna v US  302.10; IV,19,50; 260 F2d 723 (CA DC 1958)
  • Henry v US  302.12; V,30; 361 US 98 (1959)
  • Rios v US  302.13; V,30,83; 364 US 253 (1960); ACLU
  • Elkins and Clark v US  302.14; V,83—VII,12; 364 US 206 (1960); ACLU
  • US v Lester  302.15; VI,61,87; 282 F2d 750 (CA 3 1960), cd 364 US 937 (1961)
  • US v Moore  302.16; VI,61—VII,80; 296 F2d 519 (CA 5 1961); ACLU
  • Wilson v Schnettler  302.17; VI,87; 365 US 381 (1961)
  • Chapman v US  302.18; VI,113—VII,12; 365 US 610 (1961)
  • Hall v Warden  302.19; VII,46; 201 FSupp 639 (DC Md 1962)
  • DiBella v US; US v Koenig  302.20; VII,80—VIII,101; 369 US 121 (1962)
  • Ravellette v Smith  302.21; VII,80,110; 300 F2d 854 (CA 7 1962)
  • US v Monroe  302.22; VIII,101—X,107; 205 FSupp 175 (ED La 1962)
  • US v Cohn  302.23; IX,49,92
  • Ramsey v US  302.24; IX,49—X,36; 329 F2d 432 (CA 9 1964)
  • Preston v US  302.25; IX,92; 376 US 364 (1964)
  • US v Michel Blefare  302.26; X,107—XIII,71; 362 F2d 870 (CA 9 1966)
  • Kahn v US; Schawartzberg v US; Pacelli v US  302.27; XI,80—XIII,71; 251 FSupp 702 (SD NY 1966), 366 F2d 259 (CA 2 1966), cd 385 US 948 (1966); MCLL
  • Brulay v US  302.28; XIII,71; 383 F2d 345 (CA 9 1967), cd 389 US 986 (1967)
  • Harris v US  302.29; XIII,71—XIV,69; 370 F2d 477 (CA DC 1966), 386 US 1003 (1967), 390 US 234 (1968)
  • US v Laney, Covington  302.30; XIV,69
  • Sabbath v US  302.31; XIV,69; 380 F2d 108 (CA 9 1967), rev'd 391 US 585 (1968)
  • Simmons v US  302.32; XIV,69; 371 F2d 296 (CA 7), 390 US 377 (1968)
303. In Other State Criminal Cases
  • Irvine v California  (303.a); 248 P2d 502 (Calif DCA), aff'd 347 US 128 (1954)
  • Rea v US  (303.b), 510.1; I,60,79; 350 US 214 (1956)
  • New York v Mallay  (303.c); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Kohbieter  (303.d); MCLL
  • Mapp v Ohio  (303.e), 52.25; V,73—IX,92; 367 US 643 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v West  (303.f); MCLL; ACLU
  • Michigan v Ferguson  (303.g); MCLL; ACLU
  • Michigan v Lee  (303.h); 54 NW2d 305 (Mich Sup Ct 1952); MCLL; ACLU
  • Georgia v Kitchens  (303.i); MCLL
  • Levy v Grant  303.1; II,16—III,53
  • Rynders v Hilton  303.2; II,16,40
  • Cheveres v Oxnard  303.3; II,40,75
  • New York v Silfa; Silfa v Kennedy  303.4; II,57—III,11; 163 NYS2d 971 (NY Ct of App 1957)
  • Franklin v Gough  303.5; II,75—VII,80
  • New York v Walpin  303.6; II,75
  • Breithaupt v Abram  303.7; II,75; 352 US 432 (1957)
  • Castillo v New York  303.8; III,32
  • Ohio ex rel Eaton v Price  303.9; III,54—VII,46; 364 US 263 (1960); ACLU
  • Frank v Maryland  303.9a; IV,75,99; 359 US 360 (1959)
  • Pughsley v Chicago  303.11; III,76
  • Bechtel v Reilley  303.12; III,76—IV,19
  • Lynch v New York  303.13; IV,19
  • California v Boulton  303.15; IV,51
  • Wakat v Harlib  303.16; IV,51; 253 F2d 59 (CA 7 1958)
  • Rosenberg v Assemblyman Allen  303.18; IV,75—V,31
  • Michaels v Chappel  303.20; IV,100—VII,12; 279 F2d 600 (CA 9 1960), cd 366 US 940 (1961)
  • California v Whitman and Carter  303.21; V,31
  • New York v Walker  303.22; V,31—VII,80
  • New York v Exum  303.23; V,31,56; 163 NE2d 142 (NY Ct of App 1959); ACLU
  • Re Ward and Quince  303.24; V,56
  • Connecticut v Cesaro  303.25; V,56; 151 A2d 338 (Conn Sup Ct of Errors 1959)
  • Massachusetts v Spofford  303.27; VI,24—VII,110; 180 NE2d 673 (Mass Sup Ct 1962)
  • Massachusetts v Dorius  303.28; VI,24—VIII,133; 179 NE2d 885 (Mass Sup Ct 1962), 191 NE2d 781 (Mass Sup Jud Ct 1963)
  • Alaska v Vallis  303.30; VI,62
  • US v R Ince  (303.j), 303.30; VI,88
  • Delaware v Wolf  303.31; VI,62; 164 A2d 865 (Del Sup Ct 1960)
  • Washington v Murphy  303.32; VI,62; 355 P2d 323 (Wash Sup Ct 1960)
  • New York v DuBois  303.34; VII,47
  • Sackler v Sackler  303.35; VII,81—X,144; 229 NYS2d 61 (Sup Ct App Div 1962), 255 NYS2d 83 (NY Ct of App 1964)
  • Vermont v Ball  303.36; VII,81; 179 A2d 466 (Vt Sup Ct 1962)
  • Connecticut v DelVecchio  303.37; VII,111;182 A2d 402 (Conn Sup Ct 1962)
  • Kentucky v Mitchell  303.38; VII,111; 355 SW2d 686 (Ky Ct of App 1962)
  • Schaffer, Chalmers v Delaware  303.39; VIII,25,77; 184 A2d 689 (Dela Sup Ct 1962)
  • Washington v Michaels  303.40; VIII,25,77; 374 P2d 989 (Wash Sup Ct 1962)
  • Hawaii v Evans  303.41; VIII,25,77; 372 P2d 365 (Hawaii Sup Ct 1962)
  • Ker v California  303.42; VIII,25—IX,92; 374 US 23 (1963)
  • New York v Randazzo  303.43; VIII,77—X,144; 254 NYS2d 99 (NY Ct of App 1964), cd 381 US 953 (1965)
  • Head v Mississippi  303.44; VIII,77; 136 So2d 619 (Miss Sup Ct 1962), cd 371 US 910 (1962)
  • Illinois v Mike's Place  303.45; IX,50
  • California v Parham  303.46; IX,50,92; 384 P2d 1001 (Calif Sup Ct 1963), cd 377 US 945 (1964); ACLU
  • Camara v San Francisco Muni Ct  303.47; IX,50—XIII,71; 237 CA2d 128 (DCA 1965), 387 US 523 (1967); MCLL
  • California v Randazzo  303.48; IX,92—X,108; 34 CR 65 (DCA 1963), cd 377 US 1000 (1964)
  • Linkletter v Walker  303.49; IX,92—XII,32; 301 F2d 94 (CA 5 1962), 381 US 618 (1965)
  • Angelet v Fay  303.50; IX,93—X,144; 333 F2d 12 (CA 2 1964), 381 US 654 (1965)
  • New York v Evergreen Review  303.51; IX,93—X,36
  • Aguilar v Texas  303.52; IX,93; 378 US 108 (1964)
  • Weiss v Rosetti  303.53; X,108; 257 NYS2d 519 (NY Sup Ct 1965)
  • New York v Diaz  303.54; X,108
  • New York v La Verne  303.55; X,108—XI,23; 251 NYS2d 452 (NY Ct of App 1964)
  • Beck v Ohio  303.56; X,108,144; 191 NE2d 825 (Ohio Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 379 US 89 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Ohio v Bernius  303.57; X,144—XI,23; 203 NE2d 241 (Ohio Sup Ct 1964)
  • In re Agency for Investigation  303.58; X,144
  • Connecticut v Spellman  303.59; X,144; MCLL
  • California v Sterling  303.60; XI,80—XIII,71; 42 CR 519 (DCA 1965), rev'd 47 CR 205 (Sup Ct Cal 1965)
  • California v Delaney  303.61; XI,80
  • California v Huie  303.62; XI,80
  • James v Louisiana  303.63; XI,80; 169 So2d 89 (La Sup Ct 1964), 382 US 36 (1965)
  • New York v Anonymous  303.64; XI,80; 48 Misc 2d 713 (Nassau Co Sup Ct)
  • New York v Malik, Moore  303.65; XI,80
  • New York v Straehle  303.66; XI,80—XIII,72
  • Cunningham v Heinze  303.67; XI,80; 352 F2d 1 (CA 9 1965), cd 383 US 968 (1966); MCLL
  • New York v Peters  303.68; XI,80—XIV,69; 254 NYS2d 10 (Westchester Co Ct), 265 NYS2d 612 (NY Sup Ct App Div), 273 NYS2d 217 (NY Ct of App), 392 US 40 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Van Meter and Alexander  303.69; XII,32—XIII,72; MCLL
  • See v Seattle  303.70; XI,32—XIII,71; 408 P2d 262 (Sup Ct Wash 1965), rev'd 387 US 541 (1967); MCLL
  • Pennsylvania v Dawson  303.71; XII,32—XIII,72
  • New York v Leary  303.72; XII,32
  • California v Roberts  303.73; XIII,73—XIV, 70; 64 CR 70 (DCA 1967)
  • California v Quilon  303.74; XIII,73—XIV, 70; 245 CA2d 624 (DCA 1966)
  • California v Hensler, Ragan, Sullivan  303.75; XIII,73
  • New Jersey v Dilley  303.76; XIII,73; 231 A2d 353 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
  • Warden Maryland Penitentiary v Hayden  303.77; XIII,73; 195 A2d 693 (CA Md 1963), 363 F2d 647 (CA 4 1966), rev'd 387 US 294 (1967)
  • Wainwright v New Orleans  303.78; XIII,73; 184 So2d 23 (La Sup Ct 1966), dism'd 392 US 598 (1968)
  • DeForte v Mancusi  303.79; XIII,73; 261 FSupp 579 (WD NY 1966), 379 F2d 897 (CA 2 1967), 392 US 364 (1968)
  • Sibron v NY  303.80; XIII,73—XIV,70; 219 NE2d 196 (NY Ct of App 1966), rev'd 392 US 40 (1968); MCLL
  • Terry v Ohio  303.81; XIII,73—XIV,70; 214 NE2d 114 (CA Ohio 1966), 392 US 1 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Massachusetts v Painten  303.82; XIII,73,74; 252 FSupp 851 (DC Mass 1966), 368 F2d 142 (CA 1 1966), dism'd 389 US 560 (1968)
  • Schmerber v California  303.83; XIII,73; 384 US 757 (1966)
  • Cooper v California  303.84; XIII,74; 44 CR 483 (DCA 1965), aff'd 386 US 58 (1967)
  • California v Harold Johnson  303.85; XIV,70; 450 P2d 865 (Cal Sup Ct 1969), cd 395 US 969 (1969)
  • In re Donaldson  303.86; XIV,70; 269 CA2d 509 (DCA 3 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Cheatham  303.87; XIV,70; 69 CR 679 (DCA 2 1968); MCLL
  • A'Hearn v New York Co Lawyers Assn  303.88; XIV,70; 285 NYS2d 744 (Sup Ct 1967), 289 NYS2d 994 (Sup Ct App Div 1968), 298 NYS2d 315 (CA NY 1969), 300 NYS2d 597 (CA NY 1969), cd 395 US 959 (1969)
  • McSurely v Ratliff  303.90; XIV,70; 389 US 949 (1967); 398 F2d 817 (CA 6 1968), 390 US 412 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Ferguson, Harris  303.91; XIV,71; 286 NYS2d 924, 976 (Sup Ct 1968), 302 NYS2d 950 (Sup Ct App Div 1969)
  • California v Toulson  303.92; XIV,71; 77 CR 271 (DCA 1969)
  • Fuller v Alaska  303.93; XIV,71; 437 P2d 772 (Alaska Sup Ct 1968), 393 US 80 (1968)
  • Shipley v California  303.94; XIV,71; 395 US 818 (1969)
  • Overton v New York  303.95; XIV,71; 229 NE2d 596 (CA NY 1967), 393 US 85 (1968), 393 US 992 (1968); 245 NE2d 807 (CA NY 1969), 249 NE2d 366 (CA NY 1969)
  • Chimel v California  303.96; XIV,71; 61 CR 714 (DCA 4 1967), 67 CR 421 (Cal Sup Ct 1968), 439 P2d 333 (Cal Sup Ct 1968), 395 US 752 (1969)
  • Bumper v North Carolina  303.97; XIV,71; 155 SE2d 173 (NC Sup Ct 1967), 391 US 543 (1968); 169 SE2d 65 (CA NC 1969), 170 SE2d 457 (Sup Ct NC 1969)
304. Suits for False Arrest, Police Practices, Police Review Bd. (and 151, 301, 302, 303, 305, 353, 411, 429, 454, 557, 580, 590)
ALABAMA
  • US ex rel Gassaway v Norville  (304.Ala.a); MCLL
  • Nesmith v Alford  (304.Ala.2), 304.19; VII,30—X,145; 318 F2d 110 (CA 5 1963), cd 375 US 975 (1964); MCLL
  • Zellner v Lingo, Painter  (304.Ala.3), 304.47; X,39—XI,23; aff'd 334 F2d 620 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Re Alabama State Troopers, Dallas Co Officers  (304.Ala.4), 304.67; XI,24; MCLL
  • Jackson v Morrow  304.Ala.5; XII,32; 404 F2d 903 (CA 5 1968)
  • Dew v Lee  304.Ala.6; XIII,74
  • Hadnott v Grant  304.Ala.8; XIII,74
  • Houser v Hill  304.Ala.9; XIII,74—XIV,71; 278 FSupp 920 (MD Ala 1967); MCLL
  • Devine v Wood  304.Ala.9a; XIV,72; 286 FSupp 102 (MD Ala 1968)
ARIZONA
  • Arizona v Quinn  304.Ariz.1; XII,32—XIII,74
  • Arizona Civil Liberties Union v Garmire  304.Ariz.2; XIV,71; MCLL
ARKANSAS
  • Pritchard v Downie  (304.Ark.1), 304.31; IX,16,50; aff'd 326 F2d 323 (CA 8 1964)
  • Brassfield v Pearson  304.Ark.2; XII,32—XIII,74
  • Townsend v Ross  304.Ark.3; XIII,74; 396 F2d 573 (ED Ark 1967)
CALIFORNIA
  • Cohen v Cahill  (304.Calif.a); MCLL
  • Wilcox v Dewitt  (304.Calif.b); cd 332 US 763 (1947); ACLU
  • Wirin v Horrall  (304.Calif.c); NLG
  • Bustilos v Sheriff Biscailuz  (304.Calif.1), 530.5; I,80
  • Hidalgo v Sheriff Biscailuz  (304.Calif.2), 530.5; I,80
  • Wirin v Hilden  304.Calif.3, 304.13, 302.11; IV,50—XII,33
  • Goldberger v Lewis  (304.Calif.4), 304.14, 420.8; VI,67—X,37
  • Dahlgren v Clary  (304.Calif.5), 304.15; VI,24—VIII,77
  • Brooks v Gray  (304.Calif.6), 420.9; VI,67—VII,17
  • California v Johnson  (304.Calif.7), 420.17; VI,119
  • Lucero v Donovan  304.Calif.8, 304.16, 303.33; VII,13—XIII,75; 300 F2d 441 (CA 9 1962), 354 F2d 16 (CA 9 1965), 258 FSupp 979 (SD Cal 1966)
  • Von Wolfolk v Ellison  (304.Calif.9), 420.18; VII,17
  • York v Story  (304.Calif.10), 302.22; VII,110
  • Griffin v Kerr  304.Calif.12, 304.35; IX,51—XII,33; MCLL; ACLU
  • White v Bonnanno, San Francisco  304.Calif.13, 304.45; X,39—XIII,75; MCLL
  • Morton v Martin  (304.Calif.14), 304.52; X,109—XI,81
  • Garrett v Los Angeles  304.Calif.15, 304.53; X,109—XIII,75
  • Wright, Stringer v Los Angeles  304.Calif.16, 304.Calif.31, 304.54; X,109—XIII,75
  • Hinton v Smith  304.Calif.17, 304.62; X,145—XIII,75; MCLL
  • Morgan v Yuba Co  304.Calif.18, 304.64; X,146—XIII,75; 41 CR 508 (DCA 1964); MCLL
  • Ball v Miner  (304.Calif.19), 304.74; XI,24
  • Phillips v O'Connell  304.Calif.20, 304.75; XI,24—XIII,75
  • Treuhaft v Madigan, Coakley, Meese  304.Calif.21, 304.76; XI,24—XIII,75
  • California v Kesey  (304.Calif.22), 304.77; XI,24
  • Whitten and Hanna v US Secret Service Agents First-Fifth Does  304.Calif.23, 304.84; XIII,75; MCLL; ACLU
  • Seward v Oakland Police Dept  304.Calif.25, 304.87; XI,81—XII,32
  • California v Kerlin  (304.Calif.26), 304.88; XI,81
  • Peters, Namais, Friel, Kuchinsky v Wyatt (San Francisco City College)  (304.Calif.27), (24.Calif.9), 304.92; XI,82
  • Council for Religion and the Homosexual v Cahill  304.Calif.28, 304.93; XI,82—XIII,75; MCLL
  • Harris v Aufort  304.Calif.29; XII,33—XIII,75
  • California v Gallagher  304.Calif.30; XII,33—XIII,76
  • Trepanier v San Francisco  304.Calif.30a; XIV,72
  • Trice v Los Angeles  304.Calif.32; XII,33—XIII,76
  • Marlowe v Coakley  304.Calif.33; XIII,76—XIV,72; 404 F2d 70 (CA 9 1967), cd 395 US 947 (1969); MCLL
  • Figueroa v Mackey  304.Calif.34; XIII,76; MCLL
  • San Francisco v Kuelz  304.Calif.35; XIII,76
  • Bechtler v Hawthorne  304.Calif.36; XIII,76—XIV,72; MCLL
  • Deadwyler v Los Angeles  304.Calif.37; XIII,76
  • Berkeley v Birgit Williams  304.Calif.38; XIII,76
  • San Francisco v Diggers  304.Calif.39; XIII,76
  • Berg v Cahill  304.Calif.40; XIII,76
  • California v John Ross  304.Calif.41; XIII,76
  • Paddleford v Biscay  304.Calif.42; XIII,76; 307 FSupp 343 (ND Cal 1967)
  • Moore v Clark  304.Calif.43; XIII,76
  • Johnson v San Francisco  304.Calif.44; XIII,76
  • Berkeley v Guerro Phil  304.Calif.45; XIII,76
  • Hagan v Superior Ct  304.Calif.46; XIII,77; cd 385 US 1025 (1967)
  • MacDonald v California  304.Calif.47; XIII,77—XIV,72; cd 386 US 127 (1967)
  • Scruggs v Haynes  304.Calif.48; XIII,77; 60 CR 355 (DCA 1967)
  • Moore v San Francisco  304.Calif.49; XIII,77—XIV,72; MCLL
  • Osborn, Redmond v Sup't, California Men's Colony  304.Calif.50; XIII,77; cd 387 US 915 (1967)
  • Renteria v DiGiorgio  304.Calif.51; XIII,77; MCLL
  • Barsi v Pleasant Hill  304.Calif.52; XIV,72
  • Stokes v Cahill  304.Calif.54; XIV,72; MCLL
  • Re Beggars Opera  304.Calif.55; XIV,72
  • California v Boyd  304.Calif.56; XIV,72
  • Davis v Contra Costa Co  304.Calif.57; XIV,72
  • Terence Hallinan v Brady, Gutierrez  304.Calif.58; XIV,73; MCLL
  • Goldman v Oakland Police Dept  304.Calif.59; XIV,73
  • Linthcome v San Francisco, Gerald Roberts  304.Calif.60; XIV,73
  • California v Williams, Farrell  304.Calif.61; XIV,73
  • Smith v Solano Co  304.Calif.62; XIV,73; MCLL
  • Stribling v Mailliard  304.Calif.63; XIV,73; I ACQ 31; MCLL
  • California v Fuller  304.Calif.64; XIV,73
  • Pastrano v Main  304.Calif.65; XIV,73
  • Vaughs v Gain, Madigan  304.Calif.66; XIV,73
  • Murray v Madigan  304.Calif.67; XIV,73; I ACQ 42; MCLL
  • Kessel v Madigan  304.Calif.67a; XIV,73; I ACQ 42; MCLL
  • Aday v Andrews  304.Calif.68; XIV,73
  • Wilma Anderson v Los Angeles  304.Calif.69; XIV,74
  • Konell v Los Angeles Chief of Police  304.Calif.70; XIV,74
  • Bass v Los Angeles  304.Calif.70a; XIV,74
  • Delso v San Diego  304.Calif.71; XIV,74
  • Figueroa v Krupp  304.Calif.72; XIV,74; I ACQ 35; MCLL
  • Floyd v Los Angeles  304.Calif.73; XIV,74; MCLL
  • Hayes v McCree  304.Calif.74; XIV,74
  • Jimmie Rodgers v Los Angeles  304.Calif.75; XIV,74
  • California v Overfield  304.Calif.76; XIV,74
  • California v Martinez  304.Calif.77; XIV,74
  • Roygene Robinson v Los Angeles Police Dept  304.Calif.78; XIV,74; I ACQ 43; MCLL; ACLU
  • California v O'Brien  304.Calif.79; XIV,75
  • Baskett v O'Brien  304.Calif.79a; XIV,75
  • Taliaferro v Cahill  304.Calif.80; XIV,75; MCLL
COLORADO
  • Jones v Horvat  304.Colo.1; XIII,77
  • Professor v Horvat  304.Colo.2; XIII,77
CONNECTICUT
  • Harris v Lee  304.Conn.1; XIV,75; MCLL
  • Connecticut v Smolen  304.Conn.2; XIV,74; 231 A2d 283 (Cir Ct App Div 1967), 232 A2d 339 (Sup Ct 1967), cd 389 US 1044 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
DELAWARE
  • Fletcher v Peterson  304.Del.1; XIV,75; I ACQ 18; MCLL; NLG
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Gaston v Tobriner  304.DC.1, 304.33; IX,51—XIII,77
  • Carter v Hoover  304.DC.2, 304.90; XI,82—XIII,77
  • Garrett v Berrier  304.DC.3; XIII,77
  • Lewis v Aderholdt  304.DC.4; XIII,77; cd 382 US 872 (1965)
FLORIDA
  • Fletcher v Gerstein  (304.Fla.1), 420.2; V,90—VI,67
  • Gordon v Florida State Trooper  304.Fla.2, 304.68; XI,24—XIII,77
  • Rosecrans v US  304.Fla.3, 304.83; XI,25—XII,33; 11 RRLR 62 (MD Fla 1966)
  • Chambers v Tampa  304.Fla.4; XIII,78
GEORGIA
  • Ware v Johnson  (304.Ga.1), 304.21; VIII,77—XI,23
  • Brazier v Cherry  (304.Ga.2), 304.22; VIII,77—X,38; 293 F2d 401 (CA 5 1961)
  • US v Short  (304.Ga.3), 304.23; VIII,77
  • Terrell v Pritchett  (304.Ga.4), 304.65; X,146; MCLL
  • McPherson v Boutwell and Tamiami Trail Tours  304.Ga.5, 304.98; XI,82—XIV,75; rev'd 383 F2d 527 (CA 5 1967)
  • Georgia v Harris  304.Ga.6; XII,33—XIII,78
  • Harris v Justice  304.Ga.6a; XIII,78
IDAHO
  • Antelope v George  (304.Idaho.1), 304.29; VIII,133; 211 FSupp 657 (DC Idaho 1962)
ILLINOIS
  • Illinois v Ray  (304.Ill.a); MCLL
  • Swanson v McGuire  (304.Ill.2), 304.7; III,54—IX,50
  • Cedeno v Lichenstein  (304.Ill.3), 303.14, 304.9; IV,51—IX,15
  • Illinois v Cain  (304.Ill.4), 420.5; V,90
  • Monroe v Pape and Chicago  (304.Ill.5), 304.6; VI,24—IX,15; 365 US 167 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Washington v Hall  (304.Ill.6), 420.13; VI,67,119
  • Duble v Brown and Chicago  (304.Ill.7), 304.8; VI,67—IX,50
  • Duble v Brown and Chicago  (304.Ill.7a), 304.8a; VII,51—IX,50; MCLL
  • Rogers v Biskup and Chicago  (304.Ill.8), 420.14; VI,67—VII,51
  • Hardwick v Hurley  (304.Ill.9), 420.12; VI,67—VII,51; 289 F2d 529 (CA 7 1961); MCLL
  • Gonzalez v Genl Investigators  (304.Ill.10), 304.10; VII,114—X,37; MCLL
  • Dean v Smith and Chicago  (304.Ill.11), 304.11; VII,16—VIII,26
  • Richichi v Bielski; Richichi and Bielski v Chicago  (304.Ill.12), 304.5; VIII,26—IX,93; 199 NE2d 652 (Ill Ct of App 1964); MCLL
  • Cunningham v Stried and Rygiel  (304.Ill.13), 304.12; VIII,26—IX,50
  • Duzynski v Nosal  (304.Ill.14), 304.27; VIII,102—X,38; 324 F2d 924 (CA 7 1963)
  • Giancana v J Edgar Hoover, Johnson  (304.Ill.15), 304.34; IX,51—XI,23; 335 F2d 366 (CA 7 1964), cd 379 US 1001 (1965)
  • Booker v Chicago  (304.Ill.16), 304.37; IX,94
  • Gause, Avant v Chicago  304.Ill.17, 304.38; IX,94—XIV,75; MCLL
  • Mock v Chicago  304.Ill.18, 304.39; IX,94—XIII,78; MCLL
  • Bush v Pepp and Chicago  (304.Ill.19), 304.43; X,39
  • Re Judge Leighton  (304.Ill.20), 304.63; X,145; MCLL
  • Andrews v Porter and Chicago  304.Ill.21; XII,33—XIII,78; 217 NE2d 305 (Ill App Ct 1966), aff'd 226 NE2d 597 (Ill Sup Ct 1967)
  • Fox v Chicago and Price  304.Ill.22; XII,33—XIII,78; 217 NE2d 305 (Ill App Ct 1966), aff'd 226 NE2d 597 (Ill Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Kincy v Wilson  304.Ill.23; XII,34—XIII,78; MCLL
  • Kincy v Land  304.Ill.23a; XII,34—XIII,78; MCLL
  • Kerr v Chicago  304.Ill.24; XII,34—XIV,76; MCLL
  • Herschel v Wilson  304.Ill.25; XIII,79; 365 F2d 17 (CA 7 1966), cd 385 US 973 (1966)
  • Illinois v Alcantar  304.Ill.26; XIII,79
  • Illinois v Young  304.Ill.28; XIII,79; 241 NE2d 587 (App Ct 1968)
  • Ries v Daley  304.Ill.29; XIV,76; I ACQ 19; MCLL
  • Peck v Daley  304.Ill.30; XIV,76; I ACQ 38; MCLL
  • Schnell v Chicago  304.Ill.31; XIV,76; rev'd and rem 407 F2d 1084 (CA 7 1969); MCLL
  • Joseph v Rowlen  304.Ill.32; XIV,76; rev'd 402 F2d 367 (CA 7 1968), 425 F2d 1010 (CA 7 1970); MCLL
INDIANA
  • Brinkman v Indianapolis  304.Ind.1; XIII,79; 231 NE2d 169 (Ind App Ct 1967)
LOUISIANA
  • Thomas v Capaci  (304.La.a); MCLL
  • Jones v Teasley  (304.La.1), 304.18; VI,119—X,145; cd 379 US 923 (1964); MCLL
  • Tyson v Cazes  304.La.2, 304.48; X,40—XIV, 76; 238 FSupp 937 (ED La 1965), 241 FSupp 142 (ED La 1965)
  • Moore v Smith  (304.La.3), 304.49; X,40
  • Fenton v Loe  (304.La.4), 304.69; XI,24
  • Bogalusa v Horton  304.La.5; XII,34—XIII,79
  • Horton v Wascom  304.La.6; XII,34—XIII,79
  • Hall v Berry  304.La.7; XII,34—XIII,79
  • Aronson v Giarusso  304.La.8; XII,34—XIII,79; MCLL; ACLU
MARYLAND
  • Winston v Weber  304.Md.1, 304.73; XI,24—XIII,79
  • McIver v Russell  304.Md.2; XII,34—XIII,79; 264 FSupp 22 (DC Md 1966)
  • Lankford v Gelston  304.Md.3; XII,34—XIII,79; 240 FSupp 550 (DC Md), rev'd 364 F2d 197 (CA 4 1966); MCLL
  • Maryland v Mason  304.Md.4; XIV,76
MICHIGAN
  • Fitzpatrick v Hart  (304.Mich.a); MCLL
  • Green v Azzam  (304.Mich.1), 304.26; VIII,102—IX,15; MCLL
  • Thomas v Jackson  (304.Mich.2), 304.36; IX,94—X,145; MCLL
  • Elijah Muhammad v Sommers  (304.Mich.3), 304.40; IX,94—X,39; MCLL
  • Nation of Islam, Muhammad Mosque of Flint v Ind Mutual Assn  (304.Mich.3a), 304.40a; IX,94—X,145; MCLL
  • Payne v Smith, Merrill  304.Mich.4, 304.40b; X,39—XII,34
  • Stanzione v Hubbard  304.Mich.5, 304.42; IX,94—XIII,79; MCLL; ACLU
  • NAACP v Detroit Police Department  (304.Mich.6), 304.55; X,109,145
  • Detroit Police Dept—Michigan Civil Rights Comm, Agreement  (304.Mich.6a), 304.55a; X,145; MCLL
  • Re Cordell Henry  (304.Mich.6b), 304.55b; X,145
  • Re Clarence Bagley  (304.Mich.6c), 304.55c; X,155
  • Walker v Edwards  (304.Mich.7), 304.57; X,109; MCLL
  • Brown v Bauer  304.Mich.8, 304.58; X,109—XII,34; MCLL
  • Petition of Bernard  304.Mich.9; XII,34—XIII,80; MCLL
  • Low, Brooks, Williams, Syrjale Porter v Detroit, Romney, Cavannagh, Girardian, Nat'l Guard officials  304.Mich.10; XIII,80
  • Delude v Koch  304.Mich.11; XIV,76; MCLL
  • Michigan v August  304.Mich.12; XIV,76; MCLL
  • Blanding v US  304.Mich.13; XIV,76; I ACQ 20; MCLL
  • Re 5 Detroit Policemen  304.Mich.14; XIV,77
  • Rosario v Detroit Police Dep't  304.Mich.15; XIV,77
  • Leverette v Gilmore  304.Mich.16; XIV,77; MCLL
MINNESOTA
  • Chase v Police Chief Card  (304.Minn.1), 420.19; VII,51
MISSISSIPPI
  • Pierson v Ray  304.Miss.1, 304.17; VIII,27—XIII,80; 352 F2d 213 (CA 5 1965); 386 US 547 (1967); MCLL
  • US v Patridge  (304.Miss.2), 304.32; IX,16—X,145; MCLL
  • Intl Bhd of Electrical Workers v Jackson, Mississippi  304.Miss.5, 304.50; X,109—XIV,77
  • Intl Bhd of Elec Workers v Jackson City Officials, Mississippi State Officials  304.Miss.5a, 304.50a; XI,23—XIII,80
  • Raymond v Sessums  (304.Miss.6), 304.70; XI,24
  • Gordon v Evans  304.Miss.7, 304.71; XI,24—XII,35
  • Blackman v Bennett  (304.Miss.8), 304.72; XI,24
  • Clay v Robinson  304.Miss.11, 304.86; XI,81—XIII,80
  • Muilenberg v US Fidelity and Guaranty Co  304.Miss.11a; XII,35—XIII,80
  • Anderson v Nosser  304.Miss.12, 304.97; XI,82—XIV,77; MCLL
  • Wright v Wages  304.Miss.13; XII,35—XIII,81
  • Miles v Martin  304.Miss.14; XII,35—XIII,81
  • Roberts v Williams  304.Miss.15; XIII,81—XIV,77; 302 FSupp 972 (SD Miss 1969)
  • Lexington v Green  304.Miss.16; XIII,81
  • Jackson v Martin  304.Miss.17; XIII,81—XIV,77; 261 FSupp 902 (ND Miss 1969); MCLL
  • Allen v Boyd  304.Miss.18; XIV,77
  • Cleveland v Martin  304.Miss.19; XIV,77
  • Cunningham v Ingram  304.Miss.20, 63.54; XII,18—XIV,77; 12 RRLR 53 (ND Miss 1966)
  • Love v Smith  304.Miss.21; XIV,77
  • Sanders v Halbert  304.Miss.22; XIV,77
  • Thompson v Fleming  304.Miss.23; XIV,77; 402 F2d 266 (CA 5 1968)
  • Smith v Smith  304.Miss.24; XIV,78
  • Wheeler v Lott  304.Miss.25; XIV,78
MISSOURI
  • Jordan v Kelly  (304.Mo.a); 223 FSupp 731 (WD Mo 1963)
  • US v DePugh  304.Mo.1; XIII,81; 266 FSupp 417, 266 FSupp 435, 266 FSupp 453 (WD Mo 1967)
  • Koen v Long  304.Mo.2; XIV,78; 304 FSupp 1383 (ED Mo 1969); MCLL
NEVADA
  • Fremont Hotel v Central Telephone Co  304.Nev.1; XII,35—XIII,81
  • Elson v Bowen  304.Nev.2; XIV,78; 436 P2d 12 (Nev Sup Ct 1967)
NEW JERSEY
  • Rodriguez v Free and Jersey City  304.NJ.1, 304.89; XI,81—XIII,81
  • Bauers v Heisel  304.NJ.2; XII,35—XIII,81; 361 F2d 581 (CA 3 1966), cd 386 US 1021 (1967)
  • Adams v Hughes  304.NJ.3; XIII,81—XIV,78; MCLL
  • Kidd v Addonizio  304.NJ.4; XIII,81; MCLL
  • Oberkehr v Kauffman  304.NJ.5; XIII,82—XIV,78; MCLL
  • Smith v Spina  304.NJ.6; XIII,82; MCLL
  • Smith v Newark  304.NJ.6a; XIII,82
  • Anderson v Sills  304.NJ.7; XIV,78; I ACQ 42; 256 A2d 298 (NJ Sup Ct 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Black Panther Party v Police Dept of Jersey City  304.NJ.8; XIV,78; I ACQ 43; MCLL
NEW MEXICO
  • Juan Valdez v Black  304.NM.1; XIV,79; MCLL
NEW YORK
  • Admr of Fields v Applebaum  (304.NY.1), 530.3; I,44
  • Massey v NYC Police Commr  (304.NY.2), 303.17, 304.3; IV,51—VIII,25; 190 NYS2d 703 (NY Ct of App 1959); ACLU
  • Jackson v New York  (304.NY.3), 303.19, 304.4; IV,100—VIII,25
  • New York v Bowan  (304.NY.4), 420.3; V,90
  • Re Patrolman William O'Keefe  (304.NY.5), 420.4; V,90
  • Prof Genovese v NYC  (304.NY.7), 304.1, 420.6; VI,32—VIII,25
  • Hallowell v NYC  (304.NY.8), 304.2, 420.7; VI, 32—VIII,77
  • Harkins and Frankfort v NYC  (304.NY.9), 304.24; VIII,77
  • Hart's Food Stores v Rochester  (304.NY.10), 304.Misc.; X,146; 255 NYS2d 390 (Monroe Co Sup Ct 1965)
  • Cruz v New York City, Re Detective John Devlin  304.NY.11, 304.56; X,109—XIII,82; MCLL
  • Re Thomas Gilligan  (304.NY.12), 304.61; X, 145; MCLL
  • New York v Portelli  304.NY.13, 304.66; X,146—XI,81; 208 NE2d 458 (NY Ct of App 1965), cd 382 US 1009 (1966); MCLL
  • Jones (Theodore) Family v New York City  304.NY.14, 304.78; XI,24—XIII,82
  • Re Police Officers Holly, Fitzpatrick  304.NY.15, 304.79; XI,24—XII,35
  • Rodriguez v NYC  304.NY.15a; XII,35—XIII,82
  • Re Liebowitz  304.NY.16, 304.80; XI,25—XIII,82
  • Re Johansen  (304.NY.17), 304.81; XI,25; 253 NYS2d 830 (NY Sup Ct 1964)
  • New York v Cruz  (304.NY.18), 304.82; XI,25
  • Sideratos v New York  304.NY.19, 304.85; XI,81—XIV,78
  • Williams v Badge #21349  304.NY.20, 304.91; XI,82—XIII,82
  • Re Patrolman Francis Moriarty  (304.NY.21), 304.94; XI,82
  • Locust Club of Rochester v Police Advisory Bd of Rochester  304.NY.22, 304.95; XI,82—XIII,82; MCLL; ACLU
  • Cassese, Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn v Lindsay  304.NY.23; XII,36
  • New York v La Palmer  304.NY.24; XII,36—XIII,82
  • New York v Nichols  304.NY.25; XII,36—XIII,83
  • New York v Leary  304.NY.26; XIII,83—XIV,79; MCLL; ACLU
  • Marinelli v New York City  304.NY.27; XIII,83
  • Johnson v New York City  304.NY.28; XIII,83; MCLL
  • Burmeister v New York City Police Dept  304.NY.29; XIII,83—XIV,79; 275 FSupp 690 (SD NY 1967); MCLL
  • Bird v MacKenzie  304.NY.30; XIV,79
  • New York v John Peter Dorak  304.NY.31; XIV,79; MCLL
  • Robinson v New York City  304.NY.32; XIV,79
  • Jaekel v US  304.NY.33; XIV,79; 304 FSupp 993 (SD NY 1969); MCLL
  • Re Garelik  304.NY.34; XIV,79
  • Fink v Leary  304.NY.35; XIV,80; MCLL
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Evans v Jones, Co of Durham  304.NC.1, 304.46; X,39—XIII,83; 366 F2d 772 (CA 4 1966)
  • Summers v Horton  304.NC.2; XIII,83—XIV,80
  • Wheeler v Goodman  304.NC.3; XIV,80; 298 FSupp 935 (WD NC 1969), 306 FSupp 58 (WD NC 1969)
OHIO
  • Dayton Newspapers Inc v Starick  304.Ohio.1, 304.60; X,145—XII,36; rev'd and rem 345 F2d 677 (CA 6 1965)
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Schomer v McKendry  (304.Pa.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Stouffer v Morrison  (304.Pa.1), 420.10; VI, 67; 162 A2d 378 (Pa Sup Ct 1960)
  • Johnson v Crumlish  304.Pa.2, 304.44; X,39—XIII,83; 224 FSupp 22 (ED Pa 1963)
  • Harrington v Tate  304.Pa.3, 304.96; XI,82—XIV,80; rev'd 254 A2d 622 (Sup Ct Pa 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Dawson v Laws; Reaves v Todd  (304.Pa.4,5), 304.99; XI,82
  • Taylor v Tate  304.Pa.6; XIV,80
RHODE ISLAND
  • Quince v Rhode Island  (304.RI.1), 420.20; VII,114; 179 A2d 485 (RI Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Sellers v Pendarvis  304.SC.1; XIV,80
TENNESSEE
  • Bell v Hosse  (304.Tenn.1); 31 FRD 181 (MD Tenn 1962)
TEXAS
  • Texas v 86 Negro Men  (304.Tex.1), 420.15; VI,119
  • Gomez v Texas  304.Tex.2, 304.51; X,109—XIII,83; 389 SW2d 308 (Tex Ct Crim App 1965), cd 386 US 937 (1967); 402 F2d 766 (CA 5 1968), cd 394 US 936 (1969)
  • Medrano v Allee  304.Tex.3; XIII,84—XIV,80; MCLL
  • Franklin v Policemen  304.Tex.4; XIII,84
  • Texas v Franklin, Nichols  304.Tex.4a; XIII,84
VIRGINIA
  • Thomas v McCain  304.Va.1, 304.28; VIII,133—X,108
WASHINGTON
  • Horn v Baille, Greenwood and US Fid & Guar Co  (304.Wash.1), 304.20; VIII,27—IX,50; 309 F2d 167 (CA 9 1962)
  • Williams v Clinton  (304.Wash.2), 304.30; VIII, 133—X,38; MCLL
  • In re Larsen and Junell  (304.Wash.3), 304.59; X,145
WISCONSIN
  • Thornton v Buchmann  304.Wisc.1, 304.41; IX,94—XIV,80; 392 F2d 870 (CA 7 1968); MCLL
MISCELLANEOUS
  • Nichols, McCauley, Brunt v US  (304.Misc.1), 304.Misc.2; XI,25; 236 FSupp 260 (ND Miss 1964)
305. Police Line-up Procedures
  • US v Wade  305.1; XIII,84; 358 F2d 557 (CA 5 1966), vac 388 US 218 (1967)
  • Gilbert v California  305.2; XIII,84; 408 P2d 365 (Cal Sup Ct 1965), vac and rem 388 US 263 (1967)
  • Stovall v Denno  305.3; XIII,85; rev'd 355 F2d 731 (CA 2 1965), aff'd 388 US 293 (1967)
  • Foster v California  305.4; XIV,80; rev'd 394 US 440 (1969)
310. INDICTMENTS/INFORMATIONS
311. Challenge to Grand Jury Composition (and 510-516)
  • Washington v Kanistanaux  310.1; XII,36—XIII,85; 914 P2d 784 (Wash Sup Ct 1966)
  • In re William Oliver  (311.a); MCLL; NLG
  • Knowles v US  (311.c), 271.17; II,40
  • California v Superior Court and Judge Hervey  311.1; V,31; MCLL
  • Beck v Washington  311.2; VII,111; 369 US 541 (1962)
  • New York v Shakur  311.3; XIV,81; I ACQ 51; MCLL
312. Attacks on Character of Evidence
  • Barone v US  (312.a); 205 F2d 909 (CA 8 1953); ACLU
  • New York v Laino  (312.b); 176 NE2d 571 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • Utah v Faux  (312.c); 345 P2d 186 (Utah Sup Ct 1959)
  • Colbert v Kentucky  312.1; III,11; 306 SW2d 825 (Ky Ct of App 1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pennsylvania v Jacobowitz  312.2; III,33—IV,100
  • Heikkinen v US  312.5; III,33,54; 355 US 273 (1958)
  • New York v Carabello and DeJesus  312.19; V,56—VI,62; 204 NYS2d 607 (NY App Div 1960)
  • New Jersey v Corbo  312.20; V,56; 160 A2d 625 (NJ Sup Ct 1960)
  • Thompson v Louisville  312.21; V,56—VI,62; 362 US 199 (1960); MCLL; ACLU
  • Coakley v District of Columbia  312.22; V,84—VI,62; MCLL
  • New York v Rezek  312.23; VI,88
  • Maryland v Cherry  312.24; V,84
  • Re Lt Michael Collins, Jr  (312.d), 356.9, 312.24; V,87—VI,114
  • New York v Kirkup  312.25; VI,114; 216 NYS2d 749 (NY App Div 1961)
  • Molina del Rio v New York  312.26; VI,114—XII,36; 243 NYS2d 682 (NY Ct of App 1963), 250 NYS2d 257 (NY Ct of App 1964), cd 379 US 939 (1964); MCLL
  • California v Billings  312.27; VII,47
  • New York v Zimmerman  312.28; VII,47
  • Mitchell v US  312.29; VII,47,81; 368 US 439 (1962)
  • California v Poland  312.30; VIII,27
  • New York v Herbert Fields  312.31; VIII,27
  • New York v Salvador Perez  312.32; VIII,28
  • US ex rel Butler v Maroney  312.33; IX,16,95; 319 F2d 622 (CA 3 1963)
  • Michigan v Matthews  312.34; XI,82
  • US v Romano  312.35; XI,82; 203 FSupp 27 (DC Conn 1962), 330 F2d 566 (CA 2 1964), cd 380 US 942 (1965), aff'd 382 US 136 (1965)
  • Michigan v Kirby  312.36; XII,36; 144 NW2d 651 (Ct of App Mich 1966)
  • California v King  312.37; XIII,85—XIV,81; 72 CR 478 (DCA 1968)
  • New Jersey v Taylor, Sullivan  312.38; XIII,85; 231 A2d 212 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
  • New York v Keitt  312.39; XIII,85
  • US v Margeson  312.40; XIII,85; 259 FSupp 256 (ED Pa 1966), 261 FSupp 256 (ED Pa 1966)
  • California v Carol Beth Mahoney  312.41; XIV,81
313. Charge of Entrapment
  • US v Icardi  (313.a), 380.2; I,96
  • Sherman v US  313.1; III,77; 356 US 369 (1958)
  • Masciale v US  313.2; III,77; 356 US 386 (1958)
  • North Carolina v Caldwell  313.3; IV,101; 105 SE2d 189 (NC Sup Ct 1958)
  • Benson v California  313.4; X,40,146; 23 CR 908 (Calif DCA 1962), 336 F2d 791 (CA 9 1964), cd 380 US 951 (1965); MCLL
  • Hoffa, Park, Campbell, King v US  313.6, 371.9; X,114—XIII,85; 349 F2d 20 (CA 6 1965), 385 US 293 (1966); 376 F2d 1020 (CA 6 1967), 382 F2d 856 (CA 6 1967), 235 FSupp 611 (ED Tenn 1964), 245 FSupp 772 (ED Tenn 1965), 247 FSupp 692 (ED Tenn 1965), 268 FSupp 772 (ED Tenn 1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Osborn v US  313.7, 301.28; XII,31—XIII,86; 350 F2d 497 (CA 6), aff'd 385 US 323 (1966); MCLL
  • Lewis v US  313.8; XIII,86; 352 F2d 799 (CA 1 1965), aff'd 385 US 206 (1966); MCLL
314. Charge of Conspiracy (and 54)
  • Ingram v US  314.1; IV,101; 360 US 672 (1959)
  • Schaffer v US  314.2; V,10
  • Karp v US  314.3; V,10,57; 362 US 511 (1960)
  • Bufalino v US  314.4; V,84—VII,13; 285 F2d 408 (CA 2 1960); ACLU; NLG
  • Cotton v Super Ct, Imperial Co  314.5; VI, 114—VII,47; 364 P2d 241 (Calif Sup Ct 1961)
  • US v Agueci  314.6; VIII,102; 310 F2d 817 (CA 2 1962)
  • Michigan v McNeil  314.7; X,110
  • California v Schnepf  314.8; X,110—XI,25; MCLL
  • California v Williams and Hendrix  314.9 , 314.8; XI,25; 406 P2d 647 (Cal Sup Ct 1965)
  • Pennsylvania v Thomas  314.10; XII,36—XIII,86; aff'd 189 A2d 255 (Pa Sup Ct 1963), cd 375 US 856 (1963)
  • California v Bardacke (Oakland 7)  314.11; XIV,81; MCLL
  • Shaw v Garrison  314.12; XIV,81; 293 FSupp 937 (ED La 1968), 393 US 220 (1968)
  • US v Gwyther, Morgan  314.13; XIV,81; II ACQ 18
  • Alderman v US  314.14; XIV,81; 371 F2d 983 (CA 10 1967), cd 389 US 834 (1967), 394 US 165 (1969), vac 390 US 136 (1968); 424 F2d 20 (CA 10 1970)
315. Inspection of Pretrial Statements of Government Witnesses (Jencks Act)
  • Bowman Dairy Co v USA & Hotchkiss  (315.1); 340 US 919 (1951), rev'd 341 US 214 (1951); ACLU
  • Smith v Pennsylvania  (315.2); cd 363 US 855 (1960); ACLU
  • US v Fisher  (315.3); MCLL
  • US v Stull  (315.4); MCLL
  • N Smith v Pennsylvania  (315.5); 192 A2d 671 (Penn Sup Ct 1964), rem 376 US 354 (1964); MCLL
  • DiJoseph Petition  (315.6); 145 A2d 187 (Penn Sup Ct 1957)
  • US v Palermo  (315.7), 312.3
  • US v Benson  (315.8), 312.4; III,33; 20 FRD 602 (SD NY 1957)
  • Bouziden v US  (315.9), 312.7; III,54,76; 251 F2d 728 (CA 10 1958), cd 356 US 927 (1958)
  • Indiviglio v US  (315.10), 312.8; III,77; 249 F2d 549 (CA 5 1957), rev'd 357 US 574 (1958)
  • US v Carlisle  (315.11), 312.9; III,77—V,31
  • Lev v US  (315.12), 312.10; IV,51—V,10; 258 F2d 9 (CA 2 1958), aff'd 360 US 470 (1959)
  • Wool v US  (315.13), 312.11; IV,51—V,10; 360 US 470 (1959)
  • Rosenberg v US  (315.14), 312.12; IV,52—V,10; 360 US 367 (1959); MCLL
  • Palermo v US  (315.15), 312.14a; IV,100—V,10; 360 US 343 (1959)
  • Harris v US  (315.16), 312.15; IV,52,100; 261 F2d 792 (CA 9 1958), cd 360 US 933 (1959)
  • Needleman v US  (315.17), 312.16; V,10,56; 261 F2d 802 (CA 5 1958), writ den 362 US 600 (1960)
  • Tomaiolo v US  (315.18), 312.23; V,84; 249 F2d 683 (CA 2 1960)
  • Vermont v LaVallee  (315.19), 315.1; VI,63,81; 163 A2d 856 (Vt Sup Ct 1960)
  • Clancy v US  (315.20), 315.2; VI,88; 365 US 312 (1961)
  • Campbell v US  (315.21), 315.3; VI,89; 365 US 85 (1961)
  • US v Consolidated Laundries Corp of NY  (315.22), 315.4; VI,115—VII,47; 291 F2d 563 (CA 2 1961)
  • US v Weldon  (315.23), 315.5; XIII,86; 384 F2d 772 (CA 2 1967)
  • New Jersey v Tate  (315.24), 315.6; XIII,86; aff'd 221 A2d 12 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
316. Inspection of Grand Jury Minutes
  • Remington v USA  (316.1); cd 347 US 913 (1954); ACLU
  • US v Proctor & Gamble Co  (316.2); 356 US 677 (1958); ACLU
  • Schwabe v United Shoe Machinery Corp  (316.3), 312.6; III,54; 21 FRD 233 (DC DC 1957)
  • Pittsburg Plate Glass v US  (316.4), 312.13; IV,52—V,10; 360 US 395 (1959)
  • Galax Mirror Co v US  (316.5), 312.14; IV,52—V,10; 360 US 395 (1959)
  • Zborowski v US  (316.6), 312.17; V,31; 271 F2d 661 (CA 2 1959)
  • McKeever and Morrison v US  (316.7), 312.18; V,32; 271 F2d 669 (CA 2 1959)
  • In re Grand Jury Proceedings  (316.8), 315.5; VII,47
  • US v Schoeneman  (316.9), 316.1; VII,81
317. Other Discovery
  • Ruiz v California  317.1; XIV,82; MCLL; ACLU
320. DOUBLE JEOPARDY
321. In Federal Cases
  • Gore v US  (321.a); 357 US 386 (1958)
  • Pollard v US  321.1; II,75; 352 US 354 (1957)
  • Green v US  321.2; III,34,54; 355 US 184 (1957)
  • Ladner v US  321.3; IV,52,101; 358 US 169 (1958)
  • Abbate v US  321.4; IV,52,101; 359 US 187 (1959)
  • Harris v US  321.5; IV,52,101; 359 US 19 (1959)
  • Gondran v US  321.6; IV,52,101; 256 F2d 205 (CA 5 1958), cd 358 US 865 (1958)
  • Greene v US  321.7; IV,52,101; 358 US 326 (1959); ACLU
  • Petite v US  321.8; V,32; 361 US 529 (1960)
  • Gori v US  321.9; VI,63—VII,13; 367 US 364 (1961); ACLU
  • Saldana v US  321.10; VI,63,89; 365 US 646 (1961)
  • Fong Foo v US; Standard Coil Products v US  321.11; VII,81,111; 369 US 141 (1962)
  • US v Tateo  321.12; IX,95—XI,25; rev'd 377 US 463 (1964)
  • Gills v US  321.13; XI,83—XIII,86; aff'd 357 F2d 299 (CA 4 1966), cd 384 US 933 (1966)
  • Kyles v Preston  321.14; XII,37; 253 FSupp 628 (DC DC 1966), cd 385 US 840 (1966)
322. In State Cases
  • Hoag v New Jersey  322.1; III,54,77; 356 US 464 (1958)
  • Ciucci v Illinois  322.2; III,77; 356 US 571 (1958)
  • Bartkus v Illinois  322.3; III,77—V,85; 359 US 121 (1959)
  • Williams v Oklahoma  322.4; IV,53,101; 321 P2d 990 (Okla Cr Ct of App), aff'd 358 US 576 (1959)
  • Arizona v 18 Year Old  322.5; V,10
  • Atkinson v Parsekian; New Jersey v Ralph  322.6; VII,82; 179 A2d 732 (NJ Sup Ct 1962)
  • Martinis v Supreme Ct, Criminal Term  322.7; IX,16—XII,37; 258 NYS2d 65 (NY Ct of App 1965)
  • New York v Kaminetsky  322.8; X,110—XI,83; 234 FSupp 991 (ED NY 1964)
  • New York v Russell  322.9; X,110
  • California v Purvis  322.10; X,110—XI,25; 234 FSupp 147 (ND Cal 1964)
  • Kellett v Superior Court  322.11; XI,83—XII,37; 409 P2d 207 (Calif Sup Ct 1966)
  • Josey v Mathews  322.12; XI,83—XII,37; MCLL
  • Cichos v Indiana  322.13; XI,83—XIII,87; 208 NE2d 685 (Ind Sup Ct), 210 NE2d 363 (Ind Sup Ct 1965), dism'd 385 US 76 (1966)
  • Chicago v Raby  322.14; XII,37; 240 NE2d 595 (Sup Ct Ill 1968), cd 393 US 1085 (1969)
  • New York v Goldstein  322.15; XII,37—XIII,87; MCLL
  • California v Escobedo  322.16; XIII,87; MCLL
  • Waller v Florida  322.17; XIV,82; aff'd 213 So2d 623 (DCA 1968); MCLL
  • Benton v Maryland  322.18; XIV,82; 232 A2d 541 (Md Ct of App 1967), rev'd 395 US 784 (1969); on rem 260 A2d 86 (Ct of Spec App, 1969)
330. SELF-INCRIMINATION: CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR EXERCISING PRIVILEGE (and 270)
331. Before Congressional Committees
  • Adams v Maryland  (331.a); 97 A2d 281 (Md Ct of App), rev'd and rem 347 US 179 (1954)
  • New York v Waterman  (331.b); 175 NE2d 445 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • Fagerhaugh v US  (331.c), 340.6; I,16,95; 232 F2d 803 (CA 9 1956); MCLL
  • Jackins v US  (331.d), 340.5; I,16,75; 231 F2d 405 (CA 9 1956)
  • Starkovich v US  (331.e), 340.4; I,16,95; 231 F2d 411 (CA 9 1956)
  • Quinn v US  (331.f), 340.2; I,15; 349 US 155 (1955); ACLU
  • US v Dunham  (331.g), 340.3; I,16,41
  • Emspak v US  (331.h), 340.1; I,15; 203 F2d 54 (CA DC), aff'd 349 US 190 (1955); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Bart  (331.i), 310.1; I,14; 349 US 219 (1955); ACLU
  • US v Hoag  331.1; II,16,41; 142 FSupp 667 (DC DC 1955)
  • US v Markinson  331.2; II,16,41
  • US v Singer  331.3; II,16,75; 244 F2d 349 (CA DC 1957)
  • McKenzie v US  331.4; II,16—III,54; 244 F2d 712 (CA 9 1957)
  • Wollam v US  331.5; II,16—III,54; 244 F2d 212 (CA 9 1957)
  • Simpson v US  331.6; II,16—III,54; 241 F2d 222 (CA 9 1957), rev'd 355 US 7 (1957)
  • US v Wm Davis  331.7; II,58—V,85
  • US v Simpson  331.8; II,58—IV,20
  • Brewster v US  331.9; III,54—IV,53; 255 F2d 899 (CA DC 1958), cd 358 US 842 (1958)
  • Presser v US  331.10; V,32—VIII,78; 292 F2d 171 (CA 6 1961), aff'd 371 US 71 (1962)
  • US v Crosby  331.50; IV,53
332. Before State Committees
  • Malloy v Hogan  332.1; IX,95—XI,25; rev'd 378 US 1 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
333. Before Grand Juries, Courts and Tribunals
  • St Pierre v USA  (333.a); 132 F2d 837 (CA 2), dism'd 319 US 41 (1943); ACLU
  • Blau v US  (333.b); 340 US 159, 332 (1950); 343 US 918 (1952); MCLL
  • Rogers v US  (333.c); 340 US 367 (1951); MCLL
  • US v Vivian  (333.d), 330.3; I,15,57; 224 F2d 53 (CA 7 1955), cd 350 US 953 (1956)
  • Falcone v Barnes  (333.e), 330.2; I,15,57; 116 FSupp 464 (ND NY), 219 F2d 137 (CA 2), rev'd 350 US 179 (1956)
  • US v Minker  (333.f), 330.1; I,15,57; 217 F2d 350 (CA 3), 350 US 179 (1956)
  • Wolke v Fleming  (333.g); ACLU
  • Gordon v US  333.1; II,16,41; 236 F2d 916 (CA 2 1956)
  • Brown v US  333.2; II,16—III,54; 356 US 148 (1958)
  • Phillips v US  333.3; II,16—III,77; 254 F2d 687 (CA 9 1958); ACLU
  • Daschbach v US  333.3a; II,16—III,77
  • Pettus v US  333.3b; III,77
  • Yates v US  333.4; II,16—III,77; 356 US 363 (1958)
  • Bradley v O'Hare  333.5; II,41; 156 NYS2d 367 (NY App Ct 1956)
  • US v Matles  333.6; II,58—III,78; 356 US 256 (1958)
  • Grunewald (Halperin) v US  333.7; II,76; 353 US 391 (1957)
  • Curcio v US  333.8; II,76; 354 US 118 (1957)
  • US v Orta  333.9; III,78; 253 F2d 312 (CA 5 1958), cd 357 US 905 (1958)
  • Mills v Louisiana  333.10; IV,53—V,32; 360 US 230 (1959)
  • Matter of NY Commission of Investigation v Rosato  333.11; IV,53
  • NY Commission of Investigation v Lombardozzi  333.12; IV,53—V,11; 180 NYS2d 496 (NY App Div 1958)
  • Castellano v NY Commission of Investigation  333.13; IV,77—V,11; 158 NE2d 250 (NY Ct of App 1959), cd 360 US 930 (1959)
  • Brown v US  333.14; IV,77,102; 359 US 41 (1959)
  • Hashagen v US  333.15; V,85; 283 F2d 345 (CA 9 1960)
  • Nusbaum v Newark Morning Ledger  333.16; VI,26; 165 A2d 177 (NJ Sup Ct 1960)
  • New Jersey v DeCola (Hansen)  333.17; VI,26; 164 A2d 729 (NJ Sup Ct 1960)
  • Larasso and Majuri v NY State Investigation Comm  333.18; VI,26,115
  • New York v Vitale  333.19; VII,47
  • McAdoo v New York  333.20; X,40—XIII,87; 257 NYS2d 763, 272 NYS2d 412 (NY Co Crim Ct 1965), cd 386 US 1031 (1967); MCLL
  • McAdoo v Rothenberg  333.20a; X,111
  • Stevens v Marks and McCloskey  333.21; X,111—XII,37; 239 FSupp 419 (SD NY), 345 F2d 305 (CA 2 1965), rev'd 383 US 234 (1966)
  • Griffin v California  333.22; X,146—XII,37; 383 P2d 432 (Cal Sup Ct), 380 US 609 (1965)
  • Tehan v US ex rel Shott  333.22a; XI,83—XII,37; 337 F2d 990 (CA 6), vac and rem 382 US 406 (1965)
  • New Jersey v Davis  333.23; X,147—XII,37; 212 A2d 859 (NJ Super Ct 1965)
  • New Jersey v Ripa  333.24; X,147—XI,26; 212 A2d 22 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • O'Connor v Ohio  333.25; XIII,87; vac and rem 382 US 286 (1965); aff'd 217 NE2d 685 (Ohio Sup Ct), rev'd 385 US 92 (1966)
  • Chapman v California  333.26; XIII,87; 404 P2d 209 (Cal Sup Ct 1966), rev'd 386 US 18 (1967)
  • New York v Armstrong  333.27; XIV,82; 298 NYS2d 630 (Sup Ct App Div 1969); MCLL
  • Boeckenhaupt v US  333.28; XIV,82; aff'd 392 F2d 24 (CA 4 1968), cd 393 US 972 (1969)
  • In Re Seif  333.29; XIV,82
334. Grants of Immunity: Federal
  • Shapiro v USA  (334.a); 335 US 1 (1958); ACLU
  • Ullman v US  (334.b), 351.1; I,16,96; 128 FSupp 617 (DC DC), 221 F2d 760 (CA DC), 350 US 422 (1956); ACLU; NLG
  • Fitzgerald v US  334.1; II,17,41; 235 F2d 453 (CA 2 1956), cd 352 US 842 (1956)
  • US v Glasser, Symonds, Oka, McElarth  334.2; II,76—III,12
  • Reina v US  334.3; V,86—VI,63; 364 US 507 (1960)
  • Piemonte v US  334.4; VI,115—VII,13; 367 US 556 (1961); MCLL
  • In re Bart  334.5; VII,47,111; 304 F2d 631 (CA DC 1962)
  • US v Jackson  334.6; VII,82,111
  • Shotwell Mfg Co v US  334.7; VIII,78; 371 US 341 (1963)
  • US v Ahlers  334.8; X,111,147; 336 F2d 191 (CA 2 1964), cd 379 US 963 (1965)
  • US v Johnson  334.9; XI,84—XII,37; 337 F2d 180 (CA 4 1964), aff'd and rem 383 US 169 (1966)
  • Carter v US  334.10; XIV,83; I ACQ 38; 302 FSupp 560, 569 (ND Cal 1969), 417 F2d 384 (CA 9 1969); MCLL; ACLU
335. Grants of Immunity: State
  • In re Melvin Osterman  (335.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Regan v New York  (335.b), 396.1; I,17; 122 NYS2d 478 (Sup Ct NY App Div), aff'd 117 NE2d 921 (Ct of App 1954), 349 US 58 (1955)
  • Louisiana v Dominguez  (335.c), 396.8; I,76,96; 82 So2d 12 (La Sup Ct 1955)
  • Ohio v Morgan  335.1; II,17—V,11; 360 US 423 (1959); MCLL
  • Ohio v Jackson and Terrill  335.2; II,17—V,11; MCLL
  • Ohio v Hupman  335.3; II,17—V,11
  • Raley v Ohio  335.4; II,17—V,11; 360 US 423 (1959); MCLL
  • Slagle v Ohio  335.5; II,17—VI,26; 366 US 259 (1961)
  • Ohio v Arnold  335.6; II,17—V,33
  • Knapp v Schweitzer  335.7; II,17—IV,53; 357 US 371 (1958); MCLL
  • Lanza v New York  335.8; III,35,55; 175 NE2d 833 (NY Ct of App 1961); ACLU
  • New York v Riela  335.9; V,57—VI,89; 193 NYS2d 663 (Co Ct of Tioga Co 1959), cd 364 US 474 (1960)
  • Main v Florida  335.10; VII,48—VIII,78
  • Murphy v Waterfront Commr of NY Harbor  335.11; IX,96—XI,26; 378 US 52 (1964); MCLL
  • New York v Woodruff  335.12; XIII,87; 270 NYS2d 838, 272 NYS2d 786 (Sup Ct 1966), 288 NYS2d 1004 (NY Ct of App 1968)
  • Gardner v Broderick  335.13; XIV,83; 279 NYS2d 150 (NY Sup Ct 1967), aff'd 229 NE2d 184 (NY Ct of App 1967), rev'd 392 US 273 (1968)
336. Criminal Registration Laws (and 211)
  • Lambert v California  336.1; II,76—IV,77; 355 US 225 (1957)
  • Reyes v US  336.2; III,35—IV,102; 258 F2d 774 (CA 9 1958)
  • Perez v US  336.3; III,55—IV,102; 258 F2d 774 (CA 9 1958)
  • Kelly v Municipal Ct of San Francisco  336.4; III,55—IV,54; 324 P2d 990 (Calif DCA 1958)
  • California v Shibley  336.5; IV,77—V,33
  • Abbott v Los Angeles  336.6; IV,77—V,33; 349 P2d 974 (Calif Sup Ct 1960)
  • Costello v US  336.7; XI,84—XIII,88; aff'd 352 F2d 848 (CA 2), vac 390 US 201 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Markis v US; Moretti v US  336.8; XIII, 88; 352 F2d 860 (CA 2 1965), aff'd 353 F2d 672 (CA 2 1965), vac and rem 387 US 425 (1967)
  • Grosso v US; Marchetti v US  336.9; XIII,88—XIV,83; 358 F2d 154 (CA 3), rev'd 390 US 62 (1968); 352 F2d 848 (CA 2), rev'd 390 US 39 (1968)
  • Standefer v Colorado  336.10; XIII,88; MCLL
  • Minor v US; Buie v US  336.11; XIV,83; aff'd 398 F2d 511 (CA 2); aff'd 407 F2d 905 (CA 2), aff'd 396 US 87 (1969)
  • Jeremiah Kelley v US  336.12; XIV,83; 254 FSupp 9 (SD NY 1966), 395 F2d 727 (CA 2 1968), cd 393 US 963 (1968)
  • Leary v US  336.13; XIV,83; 383 F2d 851 (CA 5 1967), rev'd and rem 395 US 6 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Belmar v Ulesky  336.14; XIV,84; 241 A2d 671 (Monmouth Co Ct 1968), 252 A2d 720 (NJ Sup Ct 1969)
337. Miscellaneous
  • California v Joan Abrams  337.1; XII,37—XIV,84; MCLL
  • Sizemore v US  337.2; XIV,84; rev'd and rem 393 F2d 656 (CA 8 1968)
340. SELF-INCRIMINATION: CIVIL SANCTIONS FOR EXERCISING PRIVILEGE (and 280)
341. Effect on Army Discharges (and 253)
  • 1st Lt MD  (341.1), 450.1; I,19
  • Cheung v Ailes  341.4; X,147—XIII,88
  • Vitelli v US  341.5; XII,38
342. Effect on Employment-Public School Teachers (and 24, 262, 267, 281, 571)
  • Faxon v School Comm of Boston  (342.a); MCLL
  • Slochower v Bd of Higher Educ  342.1; II,17, 58; 118 NYS2d 487 (Sup Ct App Div), 119 NYS2d 373 (Sup Ct App Div), rev'd 350 US 551 (1956); MCLL; ACLU
  • Daniman v Bd of Educ of New York  342.2; II,17—IV,44; 121 NE2d 629 (NY Ct of App 1954), app dism'd 348 US 933 (1955); MCLL
  • Schlakman v NY Bd of Higher Educ  342.2a; II,41—III,12
  • Austin v NY Bd of Higher Educ  342.2b; III,12—IV,103; 158 NE2d 681 (NY Ct of App 1959); MCLL
  • Laba and Lowenstein v Newark Bd of Educ  342.3; II,17—VII,14; 129 A2d 273 (NJ Sup Ct 1957), 163 A2d 156 (NJ Sup Ct 1960)
  • Bd of Educ of San Francisco v Mass  342.4; II,17—VII,48; 304 P2d 1015 (Calif Sup Ct 1956); Mass v Super Ct, 17 CR 549 (DCA 1961); ACLU
  • Mass v Bd of Educ, San Francisco Unif School Dist  342.4a; VII,48—X,111; 304 P2d 1015 (1956), 17 CR 549 (1961)
  • Bd of Trs of Contra Costa Jr College Dist v Schuyten  342.5; II,17—III,79; 326 P2d 223 (Calif DCA 1958); ACLU
  • St John v Orange Coast College  342.6; II, 18,59; 303 P2d 1056 (Calif DCA 1957)
  • Weiss v Los Angeles Bd of Educ  342.7; II,18
  • Stein v Detroit Bd of Educ  342.8; II,18,42
  • Beilan v Bd of Educ  342.9; II,59—IV,103; 357 US 399 (1958); MCLL
  • Dixie School Dist v Hanchett  342.10; III,35—IV,78
  • Bd of Pub Educ, School Dist of Philadelphia v Intille  342.11; V,33—VII,14; 163 A2d 420 (Pa Sup Ct 1960), cd 364 US 910 (1960); MCLL; ACLU
  • Bd of Pub Educ, School Dist of Philadelphia v Watson  342.12; V,33—VI,89; 163 A2d 60 (Pa Sup Ct 1960), cd 364 US 910 (1960); ACLU
  • Re Tillman Erb  342.13; VI,64,89
  • Matter of John Allen Johnson  342.14; XIII,88—XIV,84
343. Effect on Employment-Other Public Officers (and 261)
  • Lerner v Casey  343.1; II,18—IV,54; 357 US 468 (1958); ACLU
  • Hancock v Burns  343.2; II,18—III,79; 323 P2d 456 (Calif DCA 1958); ACLU
  • Nelson v Los Angeles County  343.3; II,42—V,33; 362 US 1 (1960); MCLL; ACLU
  • Callender v San Diego County  343.4; III,35—IV,54; 327 P2d 74 (Calif DCA 1958)
  • Koutnik, Gardner, Smith v New York City  343.5; X,147
  • Madden v Bd of Supervisors  343.6; XIII,88
  • Garrity v New Jersey  343.7; XIII,89; aff'd 207 A2d 689 (NJ Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 385 US 493 (1967)
  • Matter of Boikess v Aspland  343.8; XIV,84; aff'd 292 NYS2d 829 (Sup Ct 1968), 293 NYS2d 334 (Sup Ct App Div 1968); MCLL
344. Effect on Employment-Private (and 30, 268, 269)
  • Rose v Am Motors Corp  (344.a), 475.4; I,60
  • Polumbaum v United Press  (344.b), 470.2; I,78
  • Goodman v NLRB  344.1; II,18,42; 234 F2d 775 (CA 7 1956), cd 352 US 872 (1956); ACLU
  • Wilson v Loew's  344.2; II,2—III,79; 355 US 597 (1958); ACLU
  • Wilson v Liberty Films  344.3; II,42—VI,64
  • Compinsky v Universal Pictures  344.4; II,59—III,12
  • Gottlieb v Universal Pictures Co  344.5; III,12—V,34; 39 CCH Lab Cas 66,142 (La Co Sup Ct 1959)
  • United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local 610 v Westinghouse Airbrake Co  344.6; III,13—VIII,103
  • Nelson v General Electric  344.7; III,13—V,86
  • Watterman v So California Gas Co  344.8; III,35—VI,64
  • Matter of Rossetti v O'Connell, NYC Commr of Licenses  (344.c), 340.1; III,55
  • Sief v Bethlehem Steel Co, and United Steel Workers  344.9; IV,22—VII,14
  • Capital Airlines and Dist 144, IAM  344.10; IV,54
  • Gilden v Singer Mfg Co  344.11; IV,55
  • Baron v Radio Corp of America  344.12; IV,55; MCLL
  • Zellman v Bethlehem Steel Co and United Steel Workers  344.13; IV,78—VII,111; MCLL
345. Effect on Attorneys (and 265, 373)
  • Sheiner v Florida  (345.a), 480.1; I,21,98; 82 So2d 657 (Fla Sup Ct 1955); ACLU; NLG
  • Integration Rule of the Florida Bar  (345.b); 103 So2d 873 (Fla Sup Ct 1958)
  • Re Witt and Matusow  (345.c), 480.2; I,21
  • Goldner v Silver  (345.d); cd 379 US 959 (1965); ACLU
  • Cohen v Hurley  345.1; V,58—X,147; 366 US 117 (1961); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Spevack v Klein  345.2; XI,84—XIII,89; 213 NE2d 457 (NY Ct of App 1965), aff'd 214 NE2d 373 (NY Ct of App 1966), rev'd 385 US 511 (1967); MCLL
  • Kaye v Co-Ordinating Comm on Discipline of NY Bar Assoc  345.3; XIII,89; 266 NYS2d 69 (NY Sup Ct 1966), vac & rem 386 US 17 (1967)
  • In re Stolar  345.4; XIV,84; 396 US 816 (1969)
346. Effect on Social Security, Unemployment Insurance (and 263, 422)
  • Trachtenberg v Michigan Employment Security Comm  (346.a), 475.1; I,20
  • Garfield v Division of Employment Security and Allis Chalmers  (346.b), 475.2; I,21,43
  • Kilpatrick v Bureau of Unemployment Compensation  346.1; II,18—V,34
  • Ostrofsky v Maryland Employment Security Bd and Bethlehem Steel Co  346.2; III,13—V,34; 147 A2d 741 (Md Ct of App 1959)
  • Fino v Sun Ray Drug Co and Md Employment Security Bd  346.3; III,36—V,11; 147 A2d 738 (Md Ct of App 1959)
  • Hallengren v Capitol Air Lines  346.4; III, 36,56
  • Lee v Eastern Stainless Steel Co  346.5 III,36,56
  • Panzino v Pa Unemployment Compensation Bd of Review  346.6; III,79—V,11; 146 A2d 736 (Pa Sup Ct 1959); ACLU
  • Ault v Unemployment Compensation Bd of Review  346.6a; V,11; 146 A2d 729 (Pa Sup Ct 1958)
  • Darin v Pa Unemployment Compensation Bd of Review  346.7; V,58; 157 A2d 407 (Pa Sup Ct 1960); ACLU
  • Re Robert Ekins  346.8; IX,17
350. DUE PROCESS
351. In Arraignment (Delay) (and 353)
  • Holt v Richmond  (351.a); cd 376 US 917 (1963); ACLU
  • Mallory v US  (351.b); 354 US 449 (1957)
  • Williams v US  351.1; III,56; 250 F2d 19 (CA DC 1957)
  • Buono v Kenton  (351.2), 351.1; VI,90—VII,111; 287 F2d 534 (CA 2 1961), cd 368 US 846 (1961)
  • McNear v Rhay  351.4; IX,17—XII,38; 398 P2d 732 (Wash Sup Ct 1965)
  • Michigan v Winegar  351.5, 372.64; XII,43—XIV,85; rev'd 145 NW2d 257 (Mich Ct of App 1966), cd 395 US 971 (1969); MCLL
  • In re Henderson Harris  351.6; XIV,85; 446 P2d 148 (Calif Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
352. In Grand Jury Procedures (and 311, 316, 512)
  • Wood v Justice Hughes  352.1; VI,90; 173 NE2d 21 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • US v Roland E Thompson  352.2; VIII,134; 319 F2d 665 (CA 2 1963)
  • Howard v Kentucky  352.3; XI,84—XII,38; 395 SW2d 355 (Ct of App Ky 1965), c dism'd 384 US 995 (1966)
  • Re Terachter  352.4; XIII,89
  • Perla v New York  352.5; XIV,85; 282 NYS2d 708 (Sup Ct 1967), 289 NYS2d 957 (NY Sup Ct 1968), 237 NE2d 215 (NY Ct of App 1968), rev'd 392 US 296 (1968)
  • California v Moschetti, Sismour  352.6; XIV, 85; MCLL
  • In re Fruchter, Grizzard, Kaplow  352.7; XIV,85; I ACQ 23; MCLL
353. In Obtaining Confessions (and 304, 371, 372)
  • Wisconsin ex rel Goodchild v Burke  (353.a); ACLU
  • Lyons v Oklahoma  (353.b); 322 US 596 (1944); ACLU
  • Leyra v Denno  (353.c); 208 F2d 605 (CA 2 1953), rev'd 347 US 556 (1954)
  • USA ex rel Eckwerth v Denno  (353.d); 261 F2d 511 (CA 2 1953), cd 358 US 945 (1959); ACLU
  • Eckwerth v New York  (353.e), 4 NY2d 811, 923, 5 NY2d 767, 982 (NY CA 1959), cd 359 US 998 (1959); ACLU
  • Latham & York v Crouse  (353.f); 375 US 959 (1963); ACLU
  • US ex rel Williams v LaVallee  (353.g); cd 364 US 922 (1960); MCLL
  • In re Kenneth LeRoy Brown  (353.h); MCLL
  • New Jersey v Cooper (Trenton 6)  (353.i); 92 A2d 786 (NJ Sup Ct 1952); v Dr Sullivan, 96 A2d 680 (NJ Sup Ct 1953); ACLU; MCLL
  • US ex rel Caminito v Murphy, Warden  (353.j), 530.1; I,22; 222 F2d 698 (CA 2 1955), cd 350 US 896 (1955)
  • Canor v Gonzales  (353.k), 530.2; I,44,60; 226 F2d 83 (CA 9 1955), cd 350 US 935 (1956)
  • New York v DiBiasi  (353.L); 166 NE2d 825 (NY Ct of App 1960)
  • Shipley v Oregon  (353.m); 375 P2d 237 (Ore Sup Ct 1963), cd 374 US 811 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Michigan v Walker  (353.n); ACLU
  • Lampe v US  (353.o); cd 368 US 958 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pennsylvania ex rel Herman v Claudy, Warden  (353.p), 530.4; I,60; 107 A2d 595 (Pa Sup Ct 1954); ACLU
  • Anderson v US  (353.q); 124 F2d 58 (CA 6 1941), rev'd 318 US 350 (1943); MCLL
  • Fikes v Alabama  353.1; II,42—III,13; rev'd and rem 352 US 191 (1957)
  • Delli Paoli v US  353.2; II,77; aff'd 352 US 232 (1957)
  • Reck v Pate  353.3; III,36—VII,14; rev'd 367 US 433 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Payne v Arkansas  353.4; III,80; rev'd 356 US 560 (1958)
  • Spano v New York  353.4a; IV,103—V,12; rev'd 360 US 315 (1959)
  • Thomas v Arizona  353.5; III,80; aff'd 356 US 390 (1958)
  • US v Corbo  (353.5a), 353.5; V,34
  • US ex rel Wade v Jackson  353.6; III,80; 144 FSupp 458 (ND NY 1956)
  • New York v Swiatkowski  (353.6b), 353.6; V,34
  • Wakat v Chicago Police Dept  353.7; III,80; 253 F2d 59 (CA 7 1958)
  • Blackburn v Alabama  (353.7a), 353.7; V,34; vac and rem 354 US 393 (1957); rev'd 361 US 199 (1960)
  • California v Atcheley  353.8; V,59—VII,14; 346 P2d 764 (Calif Sup Ct 1959), dism'd 366 US 207 (1961)
  • Ruoco and Marsala v New York  353.9; V,87; 205 NYS2d 119 (App Div 1960)
  • New Jersey v Dowden and Duffy  353.10; V,87; 162 A2d 911 (NJ Sup Ct 1960)
  • California v Trout  353.11; VI,64; 354 P2d 231 (Calif Sup Ct 1960)
  • Rogers v Richmond  353.12; VI,90—VII,83; 365 US 534 (1961)
  • Fair v Georgia  353.13; VI,90; 119 SE2d 691 (Ga Sup Ct 1961)
  • Coppola v US  353.14; VI,116—VII,14; aff'd 365 US 762 (1961)
  • Culombe v Connecticut  353.15; VI,117—VII,83; rev'd 367 US 568 (1961); MCLL
  • Lynumn v Illinois  353.16; VII,48—VIII,103; 171 NE2d 17 (Ill Sup Ct 1960), rem 372 US 528 (1963)
  • Machibroda v US  353.17; VII,48,83; vac and rem 368 US 487 (1962)
  • Gallegos v Colorado  353.18; VII,112; rev'd 370 US 49 (1962)
  • Missouri v Cookson  353.19; VIII,29—IX,17; 361 SW2d 683 (Mo Sup Ct 1962)
  • Pate v Page  353.20; VIII,29—X,47; 371 P2d 500 (Okla Ct of Crim App 1962), cd 373 US 915 (1963), cd 379 US 909 (1964); MCLL
  • Ralph v Pepersack  353.21; VIII,78—X,147; 203 FSupp 752 (DC Md 1962), 218 FSupp 932 (DC Md 1963), 335 F2d 128 (CA 4 1964), cd 380 US 925 (1965); ACLU
  • Davis v North Carolina  353.22; VIII,104—XII,38; 116 SE2d 365 (Sup Ct NC 1960), 196 FSupp 488 (ED NC 1961), cd 365 US 855 (1961); rev'd and rem 310 F2d 904 (CA 4 1962), 221 FSupp 494 (ED NC 1963); aff'd 339 F2d 770 (CA 4 1964), rev'd 384 US 737 (1966)
  • US ex rel Coleman v Denno  353.23; X,42; 313 F2d 457 (CA 2 1963)
  • Haynes v Washington  353.24; VIII,135; vac and rem 373 US 503 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Massiah v US  353.25; IX,96; rev'd 377 US 201 (1964)
  • Jackson v Denno  353.26; IX,97—XI,25; rev'd 378 US 368 (1964)
  • New York v Mitchell  353.27; X,112
  • New York v Coleman  353.28; X,112,147
  • New York v Whitmore  353.29; X,112—XIV,85; 257 NYS2d 787 (Kings Co Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 278 NYS2d 706 (Sup Ct App Div 1967); MCLL
  • Boles v Stevenson  353.30; X,112,147; 221 FSupp 411, 331 F2d 939 (CA 4 1964), rev'd 379 US 43 (1964)
  • Pennsylvania ex rel Donnell v Myers  353.31; X,147
  • New Jersey v Russo, Bisignano  353.32; X,147—XII,39; 351 F2d 429 (CA 3 1965), rev'd and rem 384 US 889 (1966); 384 US 1012 (1966)
  • New York v Perez, Novo  353.33; X,148
  • New York v Glazer  353.34; XI,25
  • US ex rel Stovall v Warden  353.35; XI,25—XII,39; 355 F2d 731 (CA 2 1966)
  • US ex rel Martin v Fay, Warden  353.35a; XI,25—XII,39; 352 F2d 418 (CA 2 1965), cd 384 US 957 (1966)
  • US v Drummond  353.35b; XI,25—XII,39; aff'd 354 F2d 132 (CA 2 1965), cd 384 US 1013 (1965)
  • US v Cone  353.35c; XI,27—XII,39; aff'd 354 F2d 119 (CA 2 1965), cd 384 US 1023 (1966)
  • New York v Perez  353.36; XI,85
  • US v Curry  353.37; XI,85—XII,39; 227 FSupp 773 (ED NY 1963), 358 F2d 904 (CA 2 1966), cd 385 US 873 (1966)
  • New York v Friedlander  353.38; XI,85—XII,39; rev'd 212 NE2d 533 (NY CA 1965)
  • New York v Sanchez  353.39; XI,85
  • Stewart v California  353.40; XI,85—XII,39; rev'd 400 P2d 97 (Cal Sup Ct 1965), aff'd 384 US 436 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Miranda v Arizona  353.41; XI,85—XIII,90; aff'd 401 P2d 721 (Sup Ct Ariz 1965), rev'd 384 US 436 (1966); ACLU
  • Vignera v New York  353.42; XI,85—XII,39; 207 NE2d 527 (Ct of App NY 1965), rev'd 384 US 436 (1966); 209 NE2d 110 (CA NY 1965), 220 NE2d 806 (CA NY 1966); ACLU
  • Westover v US  353.43; XI,85—XII,39; aff'd 342 F2d 684 (CA 9 1965), rev'd 384 US 436 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Johnson, Cassidy v New Jersey  353.44; XI,85—XII,39; 206 A2d 737 (Sup Ct NJ 1965), aff'd 384 US 719 (1966); MCLL
  • US v Nolte  353.45; XII,39; 39 FRD 359 (ND Cal 1965)
  • California v Graves  353.46; XII,40; 49 CR 386 (Cal Sup Ct), cd 385 US 883 (1966)
  • Sims v Georgia  353.47; XII,40—XIII,90; aff'd 144 SE2d 103 (Ga Sup Ct 1964), rev'd and rem 385 US 538 (1967)
  • New York v Walker  353.48; XIII,90; 265 NYS2d 609 (NY Ct of App 1966), cd 385 US 864 (1966)
  • Alabama v Mathis  353.49; XII,91; 189 So2d 564 (Ala Sup Ct 1966), cd 386 US 935 (1967)
  • Minniefield v Hale  353.50; XIII,91
  • California v Cameron  353.51; XIII,91; 63 CR 807 (CA 1967)
  • California v Jackson  353.52; XIII,91; rem 67 C2d 96 (Sup Ct 1967)
  • California v Ellis  353.53; XIII,91; rev'd 55 CR 385 (Sup Ct 1966)
  • California v Doherty  353.54; XIII,91; rev'd 59 CR 857 (Sup Ct 1967)
  • California v Sanchez  353.58; XIII,91—XIV,86; 423 P2d 800 (Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 451 P2d 74 (Sup Ct 1969)
  • California v Rollins  353.60; XIII,91; rev'd 423 P2d 221 (Sup Ct 1967)
  • Johnson v Massachusetts  353.62; XIII,91; aff'd 225 NE2d 360 (Mass Sup Ct), cd 396 US 990 (1969)
  • New Jersey v Broxton, Ogburn  353.63; XIII,91; aff'd 230 A2d 489 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
  • New Jersey v Yough  353.64; XIII,91; rev'd 231 A2d 598 (NJ Sup Ct 1967)
  • New York v Ruppert  353.65; XIII,91—XIV,86
  • New York v Skorge  353.66; XIII,91
  • New York v Suarez  353.67; XIII,91
  • New York v Stern  353.68; XIII,91
  • Clewis v Texas  353.69; XIII,92; 415 SW2d 654 (Tex Sup Ct 1962), rev'd 386 US 707 (1967)
  • Beecher v Alabama  353.70; XIII,92; aff'd 193 So2d 505 (Ala Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 389 US 35 (1967)
  • David v Strelecki  353.71; XIV,86
  • Myers v Frye  353.72; XIV,86; 401 F2d 18 (CA 7 1968); MCLL
  • Smart v Wilson  353.73; XIV,86; MCLL
  • California v Menektos  353.74; XIV,86; MCLL
  • US ex rel Castro v LaVallee  353.75; XIV,86; 282 FSupp 718 (SD NY 1968); MCLL
  • Townsend, Terry v Henderson  353.76; XIV,86; vac 405 F2d 324 (CA 6 1968)
  • Cardinale v Louisiana  353.77; XIV,87; 206 So2d 510 (La Sup Ct 1965), cd 394 US 437 (1969)
  • Gross v US  353.78; XIV,87; 393 F2d 667 (CA DC 1967)
  • Jenkins v Delaware  353.79; XIV,87; 240 A2d 146 (Dela Sup Ct 1968), aff'd 395 US 213 (1969)
  • Morales v New York  353.80; XIV,87; 280 NYS2d 520 (Sup Ct App Div 1967), 290 NYS2d 898 (Ct of App 1968), cd 395 US 948 (1969), vac and rem 396 US 102 (1969)
  • Cohen v US  353.81; XIV,87; 387 F2d 803, cd 389 US 897 (1967)
  • Mathis v US  353.82; XIV,87; aff'd 376 F2d 595 (CA 5 1967), rev'd and rem 391 US 1 (1968)
  • Frazier v Cupp  353.83; XIV,87; 388 F2d 777 (CA 9 1968), aff'd 394 US 731 (1969)
354. In Press Releases and Newspaper Coverage
  • United Press Assoc v Valente  (354.a); ACLU
  • Powell v Alabama  (354.b); 287 US 45 (1932); ACLU
  • California v Duncan  (354.c); 51 C2d 523 (Calif Sup Ct 1959); ACLU
  • Provenzano v US  (354.d); 379 US 947 (1964); ACLU
  • US v Dellamura  354.1; IV,104
  • Irvin v Dowd  (354.2), 354.1; VI,117—VII,83; 366 US 717 (1961); MCLL
  • Rideau v Louisiana  354.3; VIII,135; 373 US 723 (1963)
  • New York v Martin and Giles  354.4; IX,52; 243 (NYS2d 343 (App Div 1963)
  • Sheppard v Maxwell, Warden  354.5; X,42—XIII,92; 346 F2d 707 (CA 6 1965), rev'd and rem 384 US 333 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Lambright v California  354.6; X,42,112
  • Estes v Texas  354.7; X,112—XII,40; rev'd 381 US 532 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • New Jersey v Van Duyne  354.8; X,113; 43 NJ 369 (NJ Sup Ct 1964)
  • Seide, Accorso v Rochester Democrat and Chronicle  354.9; X,113
  • In re Clancy  354.10; X,148
  • In re Sosich  354.11; X,148
  • Texas v Ruby  354.12; XII,40; MCLL
  • Phoenix Newspapers Inc v Superior Court  354.13; XII,40—XIII,92; 418 P2d 594 (Ariz Sup Ct 1966)
  • Los Angeles v Super Ct  354.14; XII,40—XIII,92; 62 CR 435 (Ct of App 1967)
  • Viscardi v US; Pacelli v US  354.15; XIII,93; 363 F2d 385 (CA 2 1966), cd 385 US 957 (1966)
  • Whitney v Florida  354.16; XIII,93; aff'd 184 So2d 207 (Fla DCA 1966)
  • Chicago Tribune v Paschen  354.17; XIII,93
  • US v Ricca  354.18; XIII,93
  • Superior Ct v Worcester Telegram  354.19; XIII,93
  • Craemer v Superior Court  354.20; XIV,87
  • New York v Branigan  354.21; XIV,87
  • US v Cotton  354.22; XIV,87; MCLL
  • Oxnard Press-Courier v Lewis  354.23; XIV,88
355. In Admitting Perjured Testimony (and 312)
  • Mooney v Holohan  (355.a); 294 US 103 (1935); v Smith, 305 US 598 (1938); ACLU
  • US v Bridges  (355.c), 550.2; I,23; 133 FSupp 638 (ND Calif 1955), 346 US 209 (1953); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Illinois v Miller  (355.d), 550.4; I,23,61; 131 NE2d 91 (Ill Sup Ct 1955)
  • US v Zuker  (355.e), 550.1; I,23
  • New York v Edwards  (355.f); dism'd 352 US 804 (1956); ACLU
  • New York v McCloskey  (355.g); 160 NE2d 647 (NY Ct of App 1956)
  • California v Scaggs  (355.h); 153 CA2d 339 (Calif DCA 1957); ACLU
  • Giles v Maryland  (355.i), 512.Md.1, 512.32; VII,117—XI,100; 212 A2d 101 (Md Ct of App 1962), vac and rem 386 US 66 (1967); 227 A2d 745 (Md Ct of App 1967); ACLU
  • Napue v Illinois  (355.j), 355.5; IV,104; 360 US 264 (1959)
  • Swanston v New York  (355.k), 355.6; IV,104; 186 NYS2d 310 (App Div 1959)
  • Illinois v Cass and Heisig  (355.L), 355.7; V,12
  • Salemi v Denno  355.1; II,18,59; 235 F2d 910 (CA 2 1956), cd 352 US 943 (1956)
  • Landeros v New Jersey  355.2; II,18—III,13; 118 A2d 524 (NJ Sup Ct 1955), cd 351 US 966 (1956)
  • US v Kusnitz  355.3; II,19
  • Sobell v US  355.4; II,43—XIII,93; 264 FSupp 579 (SD NY), 378 F2d 674 (CA 2), cd 389 US 1051 (1968); 293 FSupp 124 (SD NY 1968), rev'd 407 F2d 180 (CA 2 1969); MCLL
  • US v Hicks  355.5; II,77
  • Yiannopoulos v Robinson, Dist Dir  355.6; III,13,36; 247 F2d 655 (CA 7 1957)
  • Re Navarrete-Sanchez  355.7; III,13
  • New York City v Ruiz  355.8; V,12
  • New York v Podinker  355.9; VI,65; 210 NYS2d 174 (NY Gen Sess 1961)
  • New York v Romeo  355.10; VII,83; 226 NYS2d 937 (App Div 1962)
  • Miller v Pate  355.11; IX,17—XIII,93; 226 FSupp 541 (ND Ill 1963), 342 F2d 646 (CA 7 1965), rev'd and rem 386 US 1 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Shuler, Chatman v Florida  355.12; X,42—XIII,94; 161 So2d 3 (Fla Sup Ct 1964), cd 379 US 892 (1964)
  • California ex rel Imbler v Warden  355.13, 304.25; VIII,77—XIV,88; 21 CR 568 (Cal Sup Ct 1962), 35 CR 293 (Cal Sup Ct 1963), 379 US 908 (1964); 278 FSupp 795 (CD Cal 1969)
356. In Courts Martial, Military Administrative Decisions, Habeas (and 124, 390)
  • White v Steer  (356.a); 327 US 304 (1946); ACLU
  • Johnson v Eisentrager  (356.b); 339 US 763 (1950); ACLU
  • US ex rel Toth v Quarles  (356.c), 527.1; I,44; 114 FSupp 468 (DC DC), 215 F2d 22 (CA DC), rev'd 350 US 11 (1955)
  • Reid v Covert  (356.d), 527.2; I,60,98; 354 US 1 (1957)
  • Kinsella v Krueger  (356.e), 527.3; I,80,98; 351 US 470 (1956)
  • Martin v Young  (356.f), 527.4; I,80; 134 FSupp 204 (ND Calif 1955)
  • McElroy v Guagliardo  356.1; IV,23—V,35; 361 US 281 (1960)
  • Lee v Madigan  356.2; IV,23,104; 358 US 228 (1959)
  • US v Dial  356.3; IV,23—V,12
  • Re Pfc Savage  356.4; IV,79—V,59
  • Kinsella v Singleton  356.5; IV,79—V,35; 361 US 234 (1960)
  • Grisham v Hagan  356.6; V,12,35; 361 US 278 (1960)
  • Wilson v Bohlender  356.7; V,12,35; 361 US 281 (1960)
  • Bell v US  356.8; V,87—VII,14; 366 US 393 (1961)
  • Re Savello  356.10; VI,28
  • Garlick v US Army  356.11; VI,65
  • Sgt West v US  356.12; VII,14,112
  • Re Pfc Chidester  356.13; VII,83
  • US ex rel Anderson v Col Allard  356.14; VIII,30,79
  • US v Culp  (356.g); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Crawford  356.15; X,113
  • Anderson v Capt MacKenzie  356.50; VII,112; 306 F2d 248 (CA 9 1962)
  • Beard v Stahr, Secy of Army  356.51; VII,112; 370 US 41 (1962)
  • US v Blalock  356.52; XIII,94; 38 CMR 456 (1967)
  • Conn v US  356.53; XIII,94; 376 F2d 878 (US Ct of Claims 1967)
  • US v Lord  356.54; XIII,94; 34 CMR 454 (1967)
  • US v Wright  356.55; XIII,95; aff'd 37 CMR 447 (1967)
  • US v Westmore  356.56; XIII,95; 38 CMR 440 (1967), 38 CMR 476 (1967)
  • US v Vogel  356.57; XIII,95; 37 CMR 462 (1967)
  • US v Tempia  356.58; XIII,95; 6 NDL 235:221; rev'd 37 CMR 249 (1967)
  • US v Ferguson  356.59; XIII,95; aff'd 37 CMR 464 (1967)
  • US v Dickinson  356.60; XIII,95
  • US v Neal  356.61; XIII,95
  • US v Manos  356.62; XIII,96; 17 USCMA 679 (1967)
  • Re Maj Gen T H Lipscomb  356.63; XIII,96
  • US v Shippman  356.64; XIII,96
  • Lane v Allen  (356.64a), 121.60; 6 NDL 235: 203; 307 FSupp 881 (ND Ohio 1969)
  • Locks v Commanding General, 6th Army  356.65; XIV,88; 6 NDL 235:221; 89 SCt 31 (1968)
  • US v Anderson  356.66; XIV,88; 6 NDL 235: 221; aff'd 17 USCMA 588 (1968)
  • Kennedy v Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks  356.67; XIV,88; aff'd 377 F2d 339 (CA 10 1967)
  • Goldwasser v Brown  356.68; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:221; I ACQ 50; 417 F2d 1169 (CA DC 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Bowers  356.69; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:221a
  • Myers v US Army  356.70; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:221a
  • Jones v Lemond  356.71; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:221a; I ACQ 37; 396 US 1227 (1969)
  • Scaggs v Larsen  356.72; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:221a; 396 US 1206 (1969)
  • O'Callahan v Parker  356.73; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:221a; 372 F2d 136 (CA 3 1967), aff'd 390 F2d 360 (CA 3 1968), rev'd 395 US 258 (1969)
  • Morse v Boswell  356.74; XIV,89; 6 NDL 235:213; 401 F2d 544 (CA 4), cd 393 US 1052 (1969)
356.100. BOARDS FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
  • Stanford v US  356.101; 6 NDL 235:221; 1 SSLR 3170 (CA 9 1968)
356.200. AS TO RESERVISTS
  • US ex rel Caputo v Sharp  356.201; 6 NDL 235:221a; 282 FSupp 362 (ED Pa 1967), 286 FSupp 516 (ED Pa 1968)
  • US ex rel Schonbrun v Commanding Officer  356.202; 6 NDL 235:221a; 403 F2d 371 (CA 2 1968), cd 394 US 929 (1969)
356.300. RESERVISTS' CHALLENGES BASED ON ENLISTMENT CONTRACT
  • Marron v Sec'y of Navy Chafee and Commanding Officer  356.301; 5 NDL 235:221
  • Fox v Brown  356.302; 6 NDL 235:221a; aff'd 402 F2d 837 (CA 2 1968), cd 394 US 938 (1969)
  • Even v Clifford  356.303; 6 NDL 235:221a
357. In Naturalization Proceedings (and 259)
  • USA v Schwimmer  (357.a); 279 US 644 (1929); ACLU
  • Weber v USA  (357.b); aff'd 315 US 787 (1942); ACLU
  • Girouard v USA  (357.c); 328 US 61 (1946); ACLU
  • Cohnstaedt v Immigration & Naturalization Service of US Dept of Justice  (357.d); 339 US 901 (1950); ACLU
  • Bockler and Wife v District Director  357.1; II,19
  • Budzislawski v US  (357.2), 357.1; III,13, 80; 254 F2d 136 (CA 9 1958)
  • Posusta v US  357.3; VI,65; 285 F2d 533 (CA 2 1961)
  • Yin-Shing Woo v US  357.4; VI,90; 288 F2d 434 (CA 2 1961)
  • In re San Francisco Chinese Girl  357.5; XII,41
  • Boutilier v Immigration and Naturalization Service  357.6; XIII,96; 363 F2d 488 (CA 2 1966), aff'd 387 US 118 (1967)
  • Astrup v Immigration and Naturalization Service  357.7; XIV,90; I ACQ 34; MCLL
  • Belle v Immigration and Naturalization Service  357.8; XIV,90
358. In Expatriation, Denaturalization, Deportation, Relocation Proceedings (and 258, 259)
  • Hirabayashi v USA  (358.a); 320 US 81 (1943); ACLU
  • Yasui v USA  (358.b); 320 US 115 (1943); ACLU
  • Korematsu v USA  (358.c); 323 US 214 (1944); ACLU
  • Ex parte Endo  (358.d); 323 US 284 (1945); ACLU
  • Okamoto v USA  (358.e); 152 F2d 905 (1946); ACLU
  • USA v Knauer  (358.f); 328 US 654 (1946); ACLU
  • USA ex rel Knauff v Shaughnessy  (358.g); 338 US 537 (1950); ACLU
  • Andrulis, Resnikoff, Keller v Attorney General  (358.h); MCLL
  • Barber v Gonzales  (358.i); 207 F2d 398 (CA 9), aff'd 347 US 637 (1954)
  • US ex rel Accardi v Shaughnessy  (358.j); 206 F2d 897 (CA 2), rev'd 347 US 260 (1954)
  • Shaughnessy v US ex rel Accardi  (358.k); 219 F2d 77 (CA 2), rev'd 349 US 280 (1955)
  • Marcello v Bonds  (358.L); 212 F2d 830 (CA 5), 349 US 302 (1955)
  • Gonzales v Landon  (358.m); 215 F2d 955 (CA 9), rev'd 350 US 920 (1955); ACLU
  • US v Chandler  (358.n); 157 FSupp 753 (SD WVa 1957); MCLL
  • US ex rel Di Dente v Ault  (358.o); MCLL
  • US ex rel Kwong Hai Chew v Colding  (358.p); 344 US 590 (1953); MCLL
  • Bridges v Wixon  (358.q); 326 US 135 (1945); MCLL
  • Diaz v Barber  (358.r), 540.8; I,99; 261 F2d 301 (1958)
  • Falcone v Barnes  (358.s), 330.2; I,15,75; 219 F2d 137 (CA 2 1955), 350 US 179 (1956)
  • Galvan v Press  (358.t); 347 US 522 (1953)
  • Gonzalez-Martinez v Landon  (358.u), 540.7; I,61; 203 F2d 196 (1953), cd 345 US 998 (1953)
  • Hyun v Landon  (358.v), 540.2; I,44,98; 219 F2d 404 (CA 9 1955), aff'd 350 US 990 (1956); MCLL
  • Lansky v Savoretti  (358.w), 330.4; I,57,75; 220 F2d 906 (CA 5 1955), rev'd 350 US 952 (1956)
  • US v Dear Kai Gay  (358.x), 358a; VII,15—VIII,135
  • Trop v Dulles  358.1; II,19—III,80; 356 US 86 (1958); MCLL; ACLU
  • Diaz-Estrata v Press  358.2; II,19—III,80
  • Matter of Bean  358.3; II,19—III,80
  • Zuskar v US  358.4; II,43; 237 F2d 528 (CA 7 1956), cd 352 US 1004 (1957)
  • Budzileni v US  358.5; II,43,77; 237 F2d 528 (CA 7 1956), cd 352 US 1004 (1957)
  • Nishikawa v Dulles  358.6; II,43—III,80; 356 US 129 (1958)
  • Perez v Brownell  358.7; II,43—III,80; 356 US 44 (1958)
  • Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez  358.8; III,57—VIII,79; rem 362 US 384 (1960); 372 US 144 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Matles v US  358.9; III,57,80; 356 US 256 (1958); MCLL
  • Costello v US  358.10; III,57,80; 247 F2d 384 (CA 2 1957), rev'd and dism'd 356 US 256 (1958)
  • US v Diamond  358.11; III,57,80; 255 F2d 749 (CA 9 1958), 356 US 257 (1958)
  • US v Fisher  358.12; III,57—IV,56; 258 F2d 362 (CA 7 1958)
  • Title v US  358.13; IV,23,104; 263 F2d 28 (CA 9 1959), cd 359 US 989 (1959)
  • Gonzales-Jasso v Rogers  358.14; IV,24,79; 264 F2d 584 (CA DC 1959)
  • Williams v Sahli  358.15; IV,79—XII,41; 292 F2d 249 (CA 6 1961)
  • US v Costello  358.16; V,35—VI,91; 365 US 265 (1961)
  • Rusk v Cort  358.17; VI,29—VIII,79; 369 US 367 (1962); 372 US 144 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Guerrieri v Rusk  358.18; VI,29,112; 186 FSupp 588 (DC DC 1960), aff'd 283 F2d 368 (CA DC 1960)
  • US v Lucchese  358.19; VI,91; 356 US 256 (1958)
  • Re Albert Gallo  358.20; VII,15—VIII,30
  • Rockwell v Rusk  358.21; VII,84—VIII,104
  • Woo Tai King v Holton, Dist Dir  358.22; VII,112—XIII,96
  • Schneider v Rusk  358.23; VIII,31—IX,97; 372 US 224 (1962); rev'd 377 US 163 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Ting v Immigration Service  358.24; VIII,79—X,113
  • Giova v Rosenberg  358.25; X,148—XI,27; 308 F2d 347 (CA 9), 379 US 18 (1964); MCLL
  • Frank v Rogers  (358.50), 358.60; III,57; 253 F2d 889 (CA DC 1958)
  • Heikkila v Celebrezze  358.51; III,57—IX,53; 216 F2d 407 (CA 9 1954), cd 349 US 927 (1955); 222 FSupp 629 (ND Calif 1963); MCLL
  • Quintana v Holland  358.52; III,80; 154 FSupp 640 (ED Pa 1957); ACLU
  • Re Daniels  (358.z2), 358.52; IV,104—VI,29
  • Kimm v Rosenberg  358.53; IV,104—V,88; 363 US 405 (1960)
  • Rogers v Cheng Fu Sheng  358.54; V,35—VI,29; 280 F2d 663 (CA DC 1960), cd 364 US 891 (1960)
  • Yee Choo Hin v Imm Service  358.55; V,35
  • Choy v Barber  358.56; V,59; 279 F2d 642 (CA 9 1960)
  • Perez-Varela v Esperdy  358.57; VI,29—VII,49; 285 F2d 723 (CA 2 1960), cd 366 US 925 (1961)
  • US v Wm and Marino Sim  358.58; VI,65
  • Marks v Esperdy  358.59; VI,118—IX,97; 203 FSupp 389 (SD NY 1962), 315 F2d 673 (CA 2 1963), aff'd 377 US 214 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Marcello v Kennedy  358.60; VII,15—VIII,135; 349 US 302 (1954); 312 F2d 874 (CA DC 1962), cd 373 US 933 (1963)
  • Sherman v Hamilton  358.61; VII,49,112; 298 F2d 247 (CA 1 1962), cd 369 US 820 (1962); MCLL
  • In re Joseph Douglas Johnson  (358.z3), 358.61; IX,97—XIII,96
  • Liadakis v Immigration and Naturalization Service  358.62; XI,85—XIV,90
  • Afroyim v Rusk  358.63; XI,85—XIII,96; 250 FSupp 686 (SD NY 1966), aff'd 361 F2d 102 (CA 2 1966), rev'd 387 US 253 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re M T Mehdi  358.64; XII,41
  • De Lucia v Immigration Serv  358.65; XIII,97; 370 F2d 305 (CA 7 1966), cd 386 US 912 (1967)
  • Wright v Immigration & Naturalization Service  358.66; XIII,97; 379 F2d 275 (CA 6 1967), cd 389 US 928 (1967)
  • Honda v Clark  358.67; XIII,97; aff'd 356 F2d 351 (CA DC 1966), rev'd 386 US 484 (1967)
  • Kwong Hai Chew v Immigration and Naturalization Service  358.68; XIV,90; 344 US 590 (1953); 257 F2d 606 (CA DC 1958), 278 FSupp 44 (SD NY 1967); MCLL
  • Immigration Service v Stanisic  358.69; XIV,90; 393 F2d 539 (CA 9 1966), rev'd 395 US 62 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
359. In Loyalty Hearings (and 251, 268)
  • Crawford v Secretary-General of the United Nations  (359.a); UN Administrative Tribunal (1953)
  • Strong v NYC Police Commr Kennedy  359.1; VI,65; 210 NYS2d 588 (NY Sup Ct 1961)
  • Scott v Macy  359.2; VIII,135—XI,27; 349 F2d 182 (CA DC 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pl v Civil Service Comm  359.3; X,148
361. In Bar Proceedings re Lawyers (and 265, 345, 373)
  • Felber v Assn of Bar of New York  361.1; XIII,97; 218 NE2d 305, 221 NE2d 915 (NY Ct of App 1966), cd 386 US 1005 (1967)
  • Powell v Comm on Admission and Grievances  361.2; XIII,97; cd 386 US 1035 (1967); MCLL
  • Swanson v Florida Bar  361.3; XIII,97—XIV,90; 381 F2d 730 (CA 5 1967), cd 389 US 972 (1967); MCLL
  • In re Grimes  361.4; XIII,97; 364 F2d 654 (CA 10 1966), cd 385 US 1035 (1967)
362. In Selective Service Proceedings (and 120-129)
  • US v Brussell  (362.a); MCLL
  • US v Burlich  (362.1), 121.49; XII,23; 257 FSupp 906 (SD NY 1966)
  • US v Wilson  (362.2), 121.54; XIII,44
  • US v Matuzek  362.3; XIII,97
  • US v Verrier  362.4; 6 NDL 235:222
  • US v Abajian  362.5; 6 NDL 235:222; 1 SSLR 3039 (CD Cal 1968)
  • Striker v Resor  362.6; 6 NDL 235:222; 283 FSupp 923 (DC NJ 1968)
  • US v Thomson  362.7; 6 NDL 235:222; 1 SSLR 3059 (DC Mass 1967)
  • Martin v Neuschel  362.8; 6 NDL 235:222; vac and rem 396 F2d 759 (CA 3 1968)
  • Lewis v Sec'y Dept of Army  362.9; 6 NDL 235:222; 402 F2d 813 (CA 9 1968)
  • Haven v US  362.10; 6 NDL 235:222; 1 SSLR 3269 (CA 9 1968)
  • US v Bellmer  362.11; 6 NDL 235:222; 404 F2d 132 (CA 3 1968)
  • US v Hammond  362.12; 6 NDL 235:222; 1 SSLR 3285 (DC SC 1968)
  • US v Dancis  362.13; 6 NDL 235:223; 406 F2d 729 (CA 2 1969), cd 394 US 1019 (1969)
  • US v Beltran  362.13a; I ACQ 37; 306 FSupp 385 (ND Cal 1969)
  • US v DeMarco  362.13b; I ACQ 37; 2 SSLR 3204 (ND Cal 1969)
  • US v Marks  362.14; XIV,90; 6 NDL 235:223; II ACQ 12; MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Peet  362.16; I ACQ 39; 420 F2d 549 (CA 9 1969)
362.100. DENIAL OF RIGHT TO COUNSEL
  • US v Sturgis  (362.100a), 371.10; X,114
  • R Miller v Selective Service System, Local 323  (362.100b), 121.43; XI,73—XII,22
  • US v Kronenthal  (362.100c), 123.60; XI,72—XIII,44
  • Wood v US  (362.101), 362.2; XIII,97; 6 NDL 235:223; cd 396 US 924 (1956); 373 F2d 894 (CA 5 1967), vac and rem 389 US 20 (1967); 387 F2d 353 (CA 5 1967); 413 F2d 437 (CA 5 1969)
  • Patton v SSS Local Bd #59  362.102; 6 NDL 235:223
  • US v Weller  362.103; I ACQ 46; 309 FSupp 50 (ND Cal 1969)
362.200. FAILURE TO REOPEN CLASSIFICATION
  • US v Garcia  362.201; 6 NDL 235:223; 1 SSLR 3016 (CD Cal 1968)
  • US ex rel Wilkerson v Commanding Officer  362.202; 6 NDL 235:223; 286 FSupp 290 (SD NY 1968)
362.300. ADVISING REGISTRANTS
  • Powers v Powers  362.301; 6 NDL 235:223; 400 F2d 438 (CA 5 1968)
  • US v Goodman  362.302; 6 NDL 235:223; 1 SSLR 3239 (ND Ill 1968)
362.400. IN ADMINISTERING REGULATIONS
  • US v Madrid  362.401; 6 NDL 235:223; 1 SSLR 3168 (WD Tex 1968)
  • US v Deppe  362.402; 6 NDL 235:223; 1 SSLR 3285 (ED NY 1968)
  • US v Walsh  362.403; 6 NDL 235:223; 279 FSupp 115 (DC Mass 1968)
  • Re Glen Lee, et al  362.404; 6 NDL 235:224
  • Re Malcolm Shearer, et al  362.405; 6 NDL 235:224
362.500. IN DELINQUENCY CLASSIFICATIONS
  • US v Bruinier  362.501; 6 NDL 235:224; 293 FSupp 666 (DC Ore 1968)
  • US ex rel Colby v Commanding Officer  362.502; 6 NDL 235:224; 281 FSupp 989 (ED NY 1968)
  • US v Brown  362.503; 6 NDL 235:224; 290 FSupp 542 (DC Del 1968)
  • US v Worstell; US v Demangone  362.504; 6 NDL 235:224; 419 F2d 762 (CA 3 1969)
362.600. AT INDUCTION CENTERS
  • Briggs v US  362.601; 6 NDL 235:224; 397 F2d 370 (CA 9 1968)
  • Beierle v US  362.602; 6 NDL 235:224; 400 F2d 128 (CA 9 1968)
  • US v Kroll  362.603; 6 NDL 235:224; 402 F2d 221 (CA 3 1968), cd 393 US 1043 (1969)
  • Oshatz v US  362.604; 6 NDL 235:224; I SSLR 3209 (CA 9 1968), I SSLR 3301 (CA 9 1968)
  • US v Meyers  362.605; 6 NDL 235:224; 410 F2d 693 (CA 2 1969), cd 396 US 835 (1969)
362.700. ERRORS AT TRIAL
  • Lowe v US  362.701; 6 NDL 235:224; 389 F2d 51 (CA 5 1968)
  • US v Grundy  362.702; 6 NDL 235:224; 398 F2d 744 (CA 3 1968)
  • US v Rabb  362.703; 6 NDL 235:224; 394 F2d 230 (CA 3 1968)
363. In Government Employment (including Teaching) (and 250-259, 260-269)
  • Zugnoni v Albany  363.1; XIV,91; ACLU
  • Donovan v US  363.2; XIV,91; 298 FSupp 674 (DC DC 1969)
365. SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL (and 390-394)
  • Duncan v Kahanamoku; White v Steer  (365.1); 327 US 304 (1946); ACLU
  • Sawyer v Wisconsin  (365.2); cd 348 US 855 (1954); ACLU
  • US v Provoo  (365.3), 522.1; I,45; 17 FRD 183 (DC Md 1955), aff'd 350 US 857 (1955)
  • In re Baird  (365.4), 360.1; II,60—III,57; 310 P2d 454 (CA 9 1957)
  • Brown v Hoblitzell, Sheriff  (365.5), 360.2; II,77—III,57; 307 SW2d 739 (Ky Ct of App 1957); MCLL; ACLU
  • Van Arsdale v Caswell  (365.6), 360.3; III,57; ACLU
  • Re Winter and Wolf  (365.7), 360.5; IV,56
  • Oklahoma v Lyles  (365.8), 360.6; IV,56; 330 P2d 734 (Okla Cr Ct of App 1958)
  • Marshall v US  (365.9), 360.7; IV,56—V,12; 360 US 310 (1959); MCLL
  • US v Browder  (365.10), 360.8; V,35; MCLL
  • Mason v Plampin  (365.11), 360.9; X,113—XI,27; 375 SW2d 916 (Tex Ct Crim App 1964), 232 FSupp 539 (WD Tex 1964), aff'd 364 F2d 1 (CA 5 1966)
  • New York v Negro  (365.a), 360.10; X,148
  • Arizona v George  (365.b), 360.11; XI,86
  • Klopfer v North Carolina  365.12, 360.12; XI,86—XIII,98; 145 SE2d 909 (NC Sup Ct 1966), rev'd 386 US 213 (1967)
  • Palmer v Boies  365.13; XII,41—XIII,98; 407 P2d 64 (Ariz Sup Ct), cd 385 US 854 (1966)
  • California v Haston, McDowell  365.14; XII,41
  • Re Petition of Green  365.15; XII,42—XIII,98
  • Arizona v Foulk  365.16; XI,42—XIII,98; MCLL
  • Johnson v Gillis  365.17; XIII,98—XIV,92; MCLL; ACLU
370. RIGHT TO COUNSEL/ACCESS TO COURTS
371. In Federal Cases (and 353)
  • Del'Marmol v Chappell  (371.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Neiswenter v Chappell  (371.b); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Morgan  (371.c); 202 F2d 67 (CA 2), rev'd 346 US 502 (1954)
  • Tinkle v US  (371.d); 254 F2d 23 (CA 8 1958)
  • Re Anonymous  371.1; II,19
  • Pennsylvania v Mims  371.2; II,19
  • Tucker v US  371.3; II,43; 235 F2d 238 (CA 9 1956)
  • Majeske v US  371.4; IV,105—V,36; 266 F2d 947 (CA 9 1959), cd 361 US 843 (1959)
  • Hyser v Reed, sub nom Jamison v Chappell  371.5; VII,113—IX,52; 318 F2d 225 (CA DC 1963), cd 375 US 957 (1963); MCLL
  • Johnson v US  371.6; X,43—XII,42; 344 F2d 401 (CA 5 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Pate v Wilson  371.7; X,43—XIII,98; aff'd 348 F2d 900 (CA 9 1965); MCLL
  • Re Frankel  371.11; XI,27—XIII,99; MCLL
  • Dillon v US  371.12; XI,86—XII,42; 230 FSupp 487 (DC Ore 1964), 346 F2d 633 (CA 9 1965), cd 382 US 978 (1966); MCLL
  • United States v Boyden  371.13; XI,86
  • Nowakowski v Maroney  371.14; XII,42—XIII,99; 387 F2d 324 (CA 3 1967), vac and rem 386 US 542 (1967); aff'd 396 F2d 802 (CA 3 1968)
  • US v Arellanes  371.15; XII,42—XIII,99; cd 371 US 930 (1962); rev'd and rem 326 F2d 560 (CA 9 1964); aff'd 353 F2d 270 (CA 9), cd 385 US 870 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Acuff v United Papermakers & Paperworkers, AFL-CIO  371.17; IV,92; 404 F2d 169 (CA 5 1968), cd 394 US 987 (1969)
  • Seale v Hoffman  371.18; XIV,92; II ACQ 12; dism'd 306 FSupp 330 (ND Ill 1969); MCLL
371.100. BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARDS
  • Jones v Warden  (371.102), 371.8; X,113,149
  • Matter of American Chinchilla Corporation  (371.103), 371.101; XIV,92; MCLL
372. In State Cases (and 353)
  • Cooper v Hutchinson  (372.a); 184 F2d 119 (CA 3 1950); ACLU
  • Bridges v Aderhold  (372.b); ACLU
  • Chandler v Fretag  (372.c); rev'd 348 US 3 (1954)
  • Freeman v Oregon  (372.d); cd 373 US 919 (1963); ACLU
  • Keitt v New York  (372.e); cd 376 US 972 (1964); ACLU
  • Anderson v Kentucky  (372.f); MCLL; ACLU
  • Arellanes v US  (372.g); MCLL; ACLU
  • Richard Riser v Warden, San Quentin  (372.h); aff'd 47 Cal2d 566 (Cal Sup Ct 1956)
  • Ronald Riser v Warden, Folsom Prison  (372.i); MCLL
  • New Jersey v Cooper & Collis  (372.j); MCLL
  • In re Aichele v Rhay  (372.k); 356 P2d 326 (Wash Sup Ct 1960)
  • Griffith v Rhay  (372.L); 282 F2d 711 (CA 9 1960), cd 364 US 941 (1961)
  • Rodriguez v Texas  (372.m); 340 SW2d 61 (Tex Crim App 1960)
  • In re Wakefield v Rhay  (372.n); 356 P2d 596 (Wash Sup Ct 1960)
  • Lefton v Hattiesburg  (372.o), 73.1; X,44
  • Henderson v Bannan, Warden  372.1; II,20—IV,105; 256 F2d 363 (CA 6 1958), cd 358 US 890 (1958)
  • Chessman v Teets  372.2; II,78; 350 US 3 (1955); 354 US 156 (1957)
  • Hinkly v Washington  372.3; III,37,81; 325 P2d 889 (Wash Sup Ct 1958)
  • Crooker v California  372.4; III,58,81; 357 US 433 (1958)
  • McKenzie v Mississippi  372.5; III,58,81; 101 So2d 651 (Miss Sup Ct 1958)
  • Cash v Culver  372.6; IV,57,105; 358 US 633 (1959)
  • Asbey v Florida  372.7; IV,57; 102 So2d 407 (DCA Fla 1958)
  • Anonymous Nos 6 and 7 v Baker  372.8; IV,57—V,88; 360 US 287 (1959)
  • Jenkins v New Jersey  372.9; V,13,59; 154 A2d 29 (NJ Sup Ct 1959)
  • Parker v Ellis  372.10; V,60; 362 US 574 (1960)
  • Hudson v North Carolina  372.11; V,88—VI,66; 66; 363 US 697 (1960)
  • McNeal v Culver  372.12; VI,66; 365 US 109 (1961)
  • Reynolds v Cochran  372.13; VI,91; 365 US 525 (1961)
  • Hamilton v Alabama  372.14; VII,49—X,149; 363 US 852 (1960); rev'd 368 US 52 (1961); ACLU
  • Chewning v Cunningham  372.15; VII,49,84; 368 US 443 (1962)
  • Crump v Sain  372.16; VII,49,113; 125 NE2d 615 (Ill Sup Ct 1955), 147 NE2d 76 (Ill Sup Ct 1957), cd 357 US 906 (1958); 264 F2d 424, 295 F2d 699 (CA 7 1961), cd 369 US 830 (1962); MCLL
  • Carnley v Cochran  372.17; VII,84,113; 369 US 506 (1962)
  • Warden v Smallwood  372.18; VII,113; 205 FSupp 325 (DC Md 1962)
  • Gideon v Wainright  372.19; VIII,32—IX,53; 372 US 335 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Florida v Gideon  372.19a; IX,18
  • Simon v Maroney  372.20; VIII,32—IX,98; 176 A2d 94 (Pa Sup Ct 1961), cd 376 US 966 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Coe  372.21; VIII,32—X,114; 232 NYS2d 944 (Oneida Co Ct 1962)
  • Alabama v Sanders  372.22; VIII,32,79; MCLL
  • Hazel v Pepersack  372.23; VIII,79—X,44; 206 FSupp 142 (DC Md 1962)
  • New York v Mawbey  372.24; VIII,80—XI,86
  • Smith v Breazeale  372.25; VIII,80—XI,87; 373 US 238 (1963); 245 FSupp 978 (ND Miss 1965); MCLL
  • Walton v Arkansas  372.27; VIII,80—X,44; 371 US 28 (1962)
  • White v Maryland  372.28; VIII,136; rev'd 373 US 59 (1963)
  • New Jersey v Reddick  372.29; IX,18; 184 A2d 652 (Super Ct App Div 1962)
  • Michigan v Cook  372.30; IX,53; MCLL
  • Mississippi v Broom  372.31; IX,98—X,44
  • Williams v Superior Court  372.32; IX,98; 38 CR 291 (DCA 1964)
  • New York v Baker  372.33; IX,98—XIV,92; MCLL
  • Baker v New York  372.33a; IX,98
  • Escobedo v Illinois  372.34; IX,98; rev'd 378 US 478 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Louisiana ex rel Williams v Hanchey  372.35; X,44,114
  • Anderson v Kentucky  372.36; X,44,149; 353 SW2d 381 (Ky Ct of App 1962), cd 369 US 829 (1962); hr'g den 379 US 805 (1964); ACLU
  • California v Dorado  372.37; X,114,149; 42 CR 169 (Calif Sup Ct 1965), cd 381 US 937,946 (1965)
  • New York v Gunner  372.38; X,114
  • Walters v Reinicke  372.39; X,114
  • Ohio v C Harris  372.40; X,114—XI,28
  • New York v Taylor  372.41; X,114,149
  • Burkes v Whitley  372.42; X,114—XI,28
  • Wisconsin v Holiday  372.43; X,149—XI,87; MCLL
  • Yates v Mississippi  372.44; X,149—XI,87; 175 So2d 617 (Miss Sup Ct 1965), cd 382 US 931 (1965)
  • California v Hillery  372.45; X,149—XI,28; 44 CR 30 (Calif Sup Ct 1965)
  • California v Williams and Lilliock  (372.45a), 372.45; X,149—XI,28; 401 P2d 4 (Calif Sup Ct 1965)
  • California v Schader and Turner  (372.45b), 372.45; X,149—XI,28; 401 P2d 665 (Calif Sup Ct 1965)
  • Bowie v Wilson  372.46; X,149—XIII,99; 373 F2d 514 (CA 9 1967); MCLL
  • New Mexico v Vaughn  372.47; X,149
  • US ex rel Carrizosa v Warden  372.48; XI,28
  • California v Stockman, Cathcart, Humble  372.49; XI,28,87; 47 CR 365 (Calif Sup Ct 1965)
  • Anthony v Pitchess  372.50; XI,28
  • Conlan v Haskins  372.51; XI,28,87; 202 NE2d 419 (Ohio Sup Ct 1964), cd 381 US 940 (1965)
  • New Jersey v Ordog, Rush  372.52; XI,28,87; 212 A2d 370 (NJ Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • New Jersey v Coleman  372.53; XI,28,87; MCLL
  • Ex rel Rogers v Stanley  372.54; XI,87—XIII,100; rev'd 270 NYS2d 573 (NY Ct of App 1966)
  • Sardone v New York  372.55; XI,87
  • McDonald v Moore  372.56; XI,87; 34 LW 2295 (CA 5 1965)
  • New York v Ressler  372.57; XI,87—XII,43; 216 NE2d 582 (NY Ct of App 1966)
  • New Jersey v Rush, Couch  372.58; XI,87—XII,43; 217 A2d 441 (NJ Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • New Jersey v Loray  372.59; XI,87—XIII,100; vac and rem 215 A2d 539 (NJ Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Michigan v Foster  372.60; XI,60—XII,43; rev'd and rem 140 NW2d 513 (Mich Sup Ct 1966)
  • Westbrook v Arizona  372.61; XI,87; 406 P2d 388 (Ariz Sup Ct), vac and rem 384 US 150 (1966)
  • Anders v California  372.62; XII,43; rev'd and rem 386 US 738 (1967)
  • California v Risenhoover  372.65; XII,43; 447 P2d 925 (Cal Dist Ct of App 1968)
  • Dowdle v New York  372.66; XII,43; cd 385 US 7 (1966)
  • Sandoval v Rattikin  372.67; XII,43; aff'd 395 SW2d 889 (Tex Ct of Civ App), cd 385 US 901 (1966)
  • Winters v Beck  372.68; XII,44; cd 385 US 907 (1966)
  • Gilmore v Lynch  372.69; XII,44—XIV,93; 400 F2d 228 (CA 9), 393 US 1092 (1969); MCLL
  • Van Geldern v Lynch  372.69a; XIII,100
  • Mullreed v Simpson  372.70; XII,44
  • Arizona v Martin  372.71; XII,44—XIII,100; rev'd 426 P2d 639 (Ariz Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Du Puis v Maxwell  372.72; XII,42—XIII,100; 415 P2d 1 (Wash Sup Ct 1966)
  • Allen v Hanchey, Warden of La Penn  372.73; XII,44; rev'd & rem 352 F2d 64 (CA 5 1965)
  • Holman v Washington  372.74; XIII,100; mod and aff'd 364 F2d 618 (CA 5 1966)
  • Arkansas v Rhodes, Drenan  372.75; XIII,100
  • Webb v Arkansas  372.76; XIII,100
  • Sawyer v District of Columbia  372.77; XIII,100—XIV,93; rem 238 A2d 314 (DC Ct of App 1968); MCLL
  • Manor v Georgia  372.78; XIII,101; aff'd 170 SE2d 290 (Ga Sup Ct 1969)
  • Kinnett v Kentucky  372.79; XIII,101
  • Dawson, Martin v Hester  372.80; XIII,101
  • New York v Wright  372.81; XIII,101
  • New York v Bunche  372.82; XIII,101
  • New York ex rel Williams v LaVallee  372.83; XIII,101; rev'd and rem 225 NE2d 735 (NY Ct of App 1967)
  • Mayberry v Weinrott  372.84; XIII,101; 255 FSupp 80 (ED Pa 1966)
  • Hackin v Arizona  372.85; XIII,101; 427 P2d 910 (Ariz Sup Ct), app dism'd 389 US 143 (1967)
  • DeJoseph v Connecticut  372.86; XIII,101; 222 A2d 752 (Conn Cir Ct), 385 US 982 (1966); MCLL
  • Re H T Harrell  372.87; XIV,93; MCLL; ACLU
  • Williams v California Dept of Motor Vehicles  372.88; XIV,93
  • California ex rel Major v Superior Court of San Francisco  372.89; XIV,93; MCLL; ACLU
  • McGarrah v Dutton  372.90; XIII,137—XIV,93; 381 F2d 161 (CA 5 1968), rev'd and rem 398 F2d 829 (1968)
  • Jeffreys v Jeffreys  372.91; XIV,93; 292 NYS2d 767 (Kings Co Sup Ct 1968)
  • Smith v Smith  372.92; XIV,93
  • Smith v Ryan  372.92a; XIV,93
  • Harris v Harris  372.92b; XIV,93
  • Boddie v Connecticut, Horowitz  372.92c; XIV,94; 286 FSupp 968 (DC Conn 1968), app dism'd 396 US 938 (1969)
  • Suber v Suber; Suber v New Jersey  372.92d; XIV,94
  • Robertson v Greene  372.93; XIV,94; 459 P2d 871 (Sup Ct Ore 1969)
  • Shirley Lee v Super Ct  372.94; XIV,94
  • Michigan v Burl Williams  372.95; XIV,94; 149 NW2d 245 (CA Mich 1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Miami v James  372.96; XIV,94
  • Zimmer v Kansas  372.97; XIV,94; 426 P2d 267 (Kan Sup Ct 1967), cd 389 US 933 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York ex rel Combs v LaVallee  372.98; XIV,94; 241 NYS2d 104 (Sup Ct App Div 1963), 278 NYS2d 287 (Sup Ct 1967), 286 NYS2d 600 (Sup Ct App Div 1968), 293 NYS2d 117 (NY Ct of App 1968); MCLL
  • Arsenault v Massachusetts  372.99; XIV,94; 233 NE2d 730 (Sup Ct 1968), rev'd 393 US 5 (1968)
  • Johnson v Avery  372.100, 374.33; XI,88—XIV,94; 252 FSupp 783 (MD Tenn 1966), 382 F2d 353 (CA 6 1967), rev'd 393 US 483 (1969)
  • Phillips v Cole  372.101; XIV,94
373. Restrictions on Attorneys and Judges (and 40, 265, 345)
  • Giffin v Illinois  (373.a); 351 US 12 (1956); MCLL
  • Cammer v US  (373.b), 560.4; I,24,100; 350 US 399 (1956); MCLL
  • In re Gray  (373.c), 560.5; I,81
  • Gladstein v McLaughlin  373.1; II,20—VI,30; 230 F2d 762 (CA 9 1955)
  • Re Sawyer  373.2; II,20—V,36; 41 Haw 403, 260 F2d 189, rev'd 360 US 622 (1959); NLG
  • Re Sawyer (Bouslog)  373.3; II,20,43
  • Shibley v US  373.4; II,20—III,81; 237 F2d 327 (CA 9 1956), cd 352 US 873 (1956); MCLL
  • Matter of Schwarz  373.5; II,44
  • Matter of Isserman  373.6; III,37—VII,15; contempt: 343 US 1 (1952); NJ (state): 88 A2d 199 (NJ Sup Ct), cd 345 US 927 (1953); USSC disbarment: 345 US 286 (1953), rev'd 348 US 1 (1954); NY (fed'l): rev'd 271 F2d 784 (CA 2 1959); NJ (state): rev'd 1952: 172 A2d 425 (NJ Sup Ct 1961); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • North Carolina v Walker  373.7; IV,57,105; 105 SE2d 101 (NC Sup Ct 1958)
  • Otto L Tucker, Atty v 7th Dist Comm of Virginia State Bar  373.8; V,36—VII,15; 120 SE2d 366 (Va Sup Ct 1961)
  • In re Complaint of 4th Dist Comm of Virginia State Bar v S W Tucker, Atty  373.9; V,36—VI,85
  • Application of Burke  373.10; V,88; 351 P2d 169 (Ariz Sup Ct 1960)
  • Louisiana v Venable and Wright  373.11; VI,91
  • US v Mitchell  373.12; VII,85,113
  • US v Taylor  373.13; VIII,80,105; 321 F2d 339 (CA 4 1963)
  • Mississippi v Higgs  (373.d), 373.14; VIII,80
  • In re R Jess Brown  373.14; IX,54—XI,28; 346 F2d 903 (CA 5 1965)
  • Re William Higgs  373.15; VIII,136
  • Mississippi v Weller  373.17; XI,28
  • Mississippi v Rogow  373.18; XI,28
  • In re Osborn and Redmond  373.19; XI,87
  • District of Columbia v Kinoy  373.20; XII,44—XIV,94; I ACQ 31; 400 F2d 761 (CA DC 1968); MCLL
  • Cowen v Calabrese  373.21; XIII,102; 41 CR 441 (DCA 1964)
  • Lawyers Constitutional Defense Committee v Alabama  373.22; XIII,102
  • Sobel v Perez  373.23; XIII,102—XIV,95; 289 FSupp 392 (ED La 1968)
  • Price v Bronstein, WJDX  373.24; XIII,102
  • Reavis v Hall  373.25; XIII,102
  • Alabama v Jelinek  373.26; XIII,102
  • Re Rowe  373.27; XIII,102
  • Dacey v Grievance Comm of Bar of Fairfield Co  373.28; XIII,102; 222 A2d 339 (Conn Sup Ct 1966), dism'd 386 US 683 (1967)
  • Michigan v Leo W Hoffman  373.29; XIV,94; 155 NW2d 708 (Mich Ct of App 1968), 168 NW2d 229 (Mich Sup Ct 1969)
  • In re Bailey  373.30; XIV,94
  • In re Ruffalo  373.31; XIV,94; 249 FSupp 432 (ND Ohio 1965), 370 F2d 447 (CA 6 1966), 390 US 544 (1968)
374. Opportunity for Appellate Review/Transcript
  • Griffin and Crenshaw v Illinois  (374.a), 567.1; I,100; 351 US 12 (1956); MCLL
  • In re Patterson  (374.b), 373.20; III,58; 317 P2d 1041 (Colo Sup Ct 1957)
  • Eskridge v Washington  374.1; III,81—VII,16; 357 US 214 (1958); MCLL
  • Bevins v Colorado  374.2; III,81—IV,80; 330 P2d 709 (Colo Sup Ct 1958)
  • West Virginia v Bosworth  (374.c); 105 SE2d 1 (W Va Sup Ct 1958)
  • Beard v Ohio  374.3; V,13,36; rev'd 361 US 4 (1959)
  • New York v Pitts  (374.d); 189 NYS2d 650 (NY Ct of App 1959)
  • Womack v Ohio  374.4; V,13; 361 US 5 (1959)
  • Rodriguez v New York  374.5; V,13,36; 178 NYS2d 993 (1959), dism'd 361 US 812 (1960)
  • Mounsey v New York  374.6; V,13,60; 361 US 812 (1959), dism'd 362 US 992 (1960)
  • Smith v US  374.7; V,13; 361 US 13 (1959); ACLU
  • Weston v Sigler, Warden  374.8; V,13,36; 361 US 37 (1958)
  • Smith v US  374.9; V,13,36; 361 US 38 (1959); ACLU
  • Willis v US  374.10; V,60; 362 US 216 (1960)
  • Douglas v Green  374.11; V,60; 363 US 192 (1959)
  • Bailleaux v Hatfield  374.12; V,89—VII,16; rev'd 290 F2d 632 (CA 9 1961), cd 368 US 862 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Whalen v Baumiller  374.13; V,89; 160 A2d 126 (Pa Sup Ct 1960)
  • Newsom v Smyth  374.14; V,89—VI,91; 108 SE 2d 369 (Va Sup Ct of App 1959), cd 365 US 604 (1961)
  • Smith and Marshall v Bennett  374.15; VI,118—VII,16; 365 US 708 (1961)
  • Coppedge v US  374.16; VII,85,113; 369 US 438 (1962)
  • Lane v Brown  374.17; VIII,80; 372 US 477 (1963)
  • Douglas v California  374.18; VIII,80; 372 US 353 (1963)
  • Draper v Washington  374.19; VIII,80; 372 US 487 (1963)
  • Norvell v Illinois  374.20; VIII,136; 373 US 420 (1963)
  • Hardy v US  374.21; IX,54; 375 US 277 (1964)
  • In re Henderson  374.22; IX,99—X,45; 393 P2d 685 (Calif Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Fallen v US  374.23; IX,99; rev'd 378 US 139 (1964)
  • Hardy v US  374.24; IX,99; 375 US 277 (1964)
  • Dillane v US  374.25; X,149—XI,88; MCLL; ACLU
  • 4 Defs v California  374.26; XI,88
  • New Jersey v Welch  374.27; XI,88—XII,44; 214 A2d 857 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • New Jersey v Loray  374.29; XI,88—XII,44; 208 A2d 183 (NJ Sup Ct 1965); 217 A2d 450 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • New Jersey v Smith  374.30; XI,88—XII,44; 217 A2d 450 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • New Jersey v Sullivan  374.31; XI,88—XII,44; 217 A2d 452 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • Lascher v California  374.32; XI,88—XII,44; 414 P2d 398 (Cal Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 928 (1966); MCLL
  • Long v District Ct of Iowa  374.34, 374.43; XII,44—XIII,103; 130 NW2d 663 (Iowa Sup Ct 1964), rev'd & rem 385 US 192 (1966)
  • Michigan v Traylor  374.36; XII,44; 155 NW2d 723 (Mich Ct of App 1968), 156 NW2d 793 (Sup Ct Mich 1968)
  • Rinaldi v Yeager  374.37; XII,45; 238 FSupp 960 (DC NJ 1965), rev'd 384 US 305 (1966)
  • Kitchens v Alderman  374.38; XIII,102; 376 F2d 262 (CA 5 1967)
  • Bryant v Illinois  374.39; XIII,102—XIV,95; cd 393 US 1015 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Detroit v Mallory, Copeland  374.40; XIII,103; 147 NW2d 66 (Sup Ct Mich 1967)
  • Anders v California  374.41; XIII,103; aff'd 333 P2d 854 (DCA 1959), rev'd and rem 386 US 738 (1967); MCLL
  • Entsminger v Iowa  374.42; XIII,103; 137 NW2d 381 (Iowa Sup Ct), rev'd and rem 386 US 748 (1967); MCLL
  • Collins v Florida  374.44; XIV,95; rev'd and rem 387 F2d 636 (CA 5 1968)
  • Herick v Municipal Court  374.45; XIV,96; aff'd 87 CR 646 (DCA 1970)
  • Magezis v Friedman  374.46; XIV,96; I ACQ 51; MCLL; ACLU
  • Gardner v California  374.47; XIV,96; 393 US 367 (1969)
  • Williams v Oklahoma City  374.48; XIV,96; 439 P2d 965 (Okla Ct of Crim App 1968), rev'd 395 US 458 (1969)
  • Morris v Florida  374.49; XIV,96; 206 So2d 286 (Fla DCA), cd 393 US 850 (1968)
375. Group Legal Services/OEO Offices (and 420-429)
  • In re Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen  (375.a); MCLL
  • United Mine Workers, District 12 v Illinois State Bar Assn  375.1; XIII,104; 219 NE2d 503 (Ill Sup Ct), vac and rem 389 US 217 (1967)
  • In re Cornell Legal Aid Clinic  375.2; XIII,104; 26 App Div Rep 2d 790 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1966); MCLL
  • In re Legal Aid Society of Albany  375.3; XIII,104; 27 App Div Rep 2d 687 (NY Sup Ct 1967)
  • In re Community Action for Legal Services, Inc, NY Legal Assistance Corp, Harlem Assertion of Rights  375.4; XIII,104; 26 App Div Rep 2d 354 (NY App Div 1966); MCLL
  • In re Community Legal Services, Inc  375.5; XIII,104
  • Re Defender Assn of Philadelphia  375.6; XIV, 96; MCLL
  • Stanislaus Co Bar Assn v Calif Rural Legal Assistance, Inc  375.7; XIV,96
376. Small Claimants' Problems (and 424, 425)
  • County of Sutter v Superior Court  376.1; XIII,105; 53 CR 424 (DCA 1966)
377. Compensation for Assigned Counsel
  • Halpin and McGlynn v Shasta Co  377.1; XII,45; 49 CR 857 (DCA 1966)
  • California v Giolitto  377.2; XIII,105
  • Weiner v Fulton County  377.3; XIII,105; 148 SE2d 143 (Ga Ct of App), cd 385 US 958 (1966)
  • Jennifer Gray Allen v San Mateo Co Super Ct  377.4; XIV,97; MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Barry  377.5; XIV,97
378. Bias and Prejudice of Judges
  • Matter of Justice Culkin  378.1; XIV,97
380. CONFRONTATION
381. In Criminal Cases
  • Williams v New York  (381.a); 337 US 241 (1949); ACLU
  • Brown v USA  (381.b); cd 360 US 911 (1959); ACLU
  • Illinois ex rel James v Lynch  (381.c); MCLL
  • Simmons v US  (381.d), 555.1; I,23; 348 US 397 (1955)
  • Roviaro v US  381.1; II,60; 353 US 53 (1957)
  • Priestly v Superior Court  381.2; IV,57; 330 P2d 39 (Calif Sup Ct 1958)
  • California v Prewitt  381.3; IV,106—V,13; 341 P2d 1 (Calif Sup Ct 1959)
  • California v Davenport  381.4; VIII,81—IX,54; 210 CA2d 335 (Calif DCA 1962), cd 374 US 814 (1964)
  • Wilson v Gray  381.5; X,45—XII,45; 230 FSupp 860 (ND Cal 1964), 345 F2d 282 (CA 9 1965), cd 379 US 983 (1965), cd 382 US 919 (1965); MCLL
  • US v Butenko, Ivanov  381.6; X,115
  • Douglas v Alabama  381.7; X,150—XI,29; 380 US 415 (1965)
  • Pointer v Texas, 381.8;  X,150—XI,29; 380 US 400 (1965)
  • Wilson v US  381.9; XI,29—XII,45; 344 F2d 166 (CA DC 1964), cd 382 US 864 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Brookhart v Janis  381.10; XI,88—XII,45; 205 NE2d 911 (Ohio Sup Ct 1966), rev'd and rem 384 US 1 (1966)
  • New Jersey v Oliver  381.11; XII,45; aff'd 50 NJ 39 (1967)
  • Cameron v Texas  381.12; XII,45—XIII,105
  • Barber v Page  381.13; XIII,105; 355 F2d 171 (CA 10 1966), 381 F2d 479 (CA 10 1966), rev'd and rem 396 US 719 (1968)
  • Jackie Washington v Texas  381.14; XIII,105; 400 SW2d 756 (Text Ct of Crim App), rev'd 388 US 14 (1967)
  • US v Reardon  381.15; XIII,105
  • McCray v Illinois  381.16; XIII,105; 210 NE2d 161 (Ill Sup Ct), aff'd 386 US 300 (1967)
  • California v Johnson  381.17; XIV,97; rev'd 441 P2d 111 (Cal Sup Ct 1968)
  • Harrington v California  381.18; XIV,97; 64 CR 159 (DCA 1967), aff'd 395 US 250 (1969)
  • Smith v Illinois  381.19; XIV,97; 217 NE2d 546 (Ill App Ct), rev'd 390 US 129 (1968)
382. In Civil Cases
  • Jay v Boyd  (382.a), 555.2; I,99; 351 US 345 (1956)
  • Re Radeka  (382.b), 380.1; II,78
  • Hecht v Monoghan  (382.c); ACLU
  • Williams v Zuckert  382.1; VII,85—XI,29; 296 F2d 416 (CA DC 1961), dism'd 371 US 531 (1963); vac and rem 372 US 765 (1963)
  • Re Martin Birnbaum  382.2; VIII,32
390. JURY TRIALS (and 41, 42, 356, 365, 510)
391. Nature of Jury Trial
  • Canon City v Merris  (391.a), 390.3; III,58—IV,80; 323 P2d 614 (Colo Sup Ct 1958)
  • Fletcher v Cavell  (391.b), 390.4; V,13—VII,113; 287 F2d 792 (CA 3 1960), cd 370 US 960 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Tennessee v Myers  (391.c), 390.6; VIII,33,81; 371 US 900 (1962)
  • Michigan v Hunter  (391.1); MCLL; ACLU
  • Michigan v Simpson  (391.2), 512.Mich.1; XIII,106; aff'd 146 NW2d 828 (Mich Ct of App 1966); MCLL
  • New York v Russo  391.7; X,45
  • California v Arguello  391.8; X,115—XI,89; 47 CR 485 (Cal Sup Ct 1965)
  • Jenkins v US  391.9; X,150—XI,29; 380 US 445 (1965)
  • Illinois v Capoldi  391.10; XI,89—XIII,106; 225 NE2d 634 (Ill Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Michigan v Jones  391.11; XII,45—XIII,106
  • Seattle v Jackson  391.12; XII,45—XIII,106; aff'd 425 P2d 385 (Wash Sup Ct 1967)
  • US v Jackson  391.13; XIII,106—XIV,98; 262 FSupp 716 (DC Conn 1967), 390 US 570 (1967)
  • Duncan v Louisiana  391.14; XIII,106—XIV,98; 195 So2d 142 (La Sup Ct), rev'd & rem 391 US 145 (1968)
  • Burgett v Texas  391.15; XIII,106; 397 SW2d 79 (Tex Ct of Crim App), rev'd 389 US 109 (1967)
  • New York v Puryear  391.16; XIV,98
  • Baldwin v New York  391.17; XIV,98; 247 NE2d 260 (NY Ct of App), 395 US 932 (1969)
392. Waiver of Jury
  • Igoe v US  392.1; X,45,150; 331 F2d 766 (CA 7 1964), cd 380 US 989 (1965)
  • Singer v US  392.2; X,45,150; 380 US 24 (1965)
  • Ex parte Jones  392.3; XI,89; 389 SW2d 670 (1965)
393. Improper Comment (and 512)
  • Cole v Arkansas  (393.a); 338 US 345 (1949); ACLU
  • California v Bentley  (393.b), 390.1; II,44
  • Michigan v Burd  393.1; XI,88—XII,45; 134 NW2d 843 (Mich Ct of App 1965)
  • Parker v Gladden  393.2; XII,46—XIII,106; 384 P2d 986 (Ore Sup Ct), rev'd 385 US 363 (1966)
  • US v Fiorito  393.3; XII,46; 300 F2d 424 (CA 7 1962)
  • Michigan v Brocato  393.4; XIV,98; MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Thompson  393.5; XIV,98; aff'd 60 CR 203 (DCA 1967), cd 392 US 930 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • New Jersey v LeRoi Jones  393.6, 429.42; XIII,132—XIV,98
394. Scrupled Jurors (and 411, 414, 461)
  • Witherspoon v Illinois  394.1; XIV,98; 224 NE2d 259 (Ill Sup Ct 1967), rev'd 391 US 510 (1968)
  • Adderly v Wainwright  394.2, 414.5; XIII,110—XIV,99; 272 FSupp 530 (MD Fla 1967); MCLL
  • Hill v Nelson  394.3, 414.6; XIII,110—XIV,99; 271 FSupp 439 (ND Cal 1967); 272 FSupp 790 (ND Cal 1967), 423 F2d 167 (CA 9 1967); MCLL
  • In re Anderson; In re Saterfield  394.4; XIV, 99; 447 P2d 117 (Cal Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
400. EXCESSIVE BAIL; PAROLE CONDITIONS
401. Amount of Bail Set
  • US v F Field  (401.a), (274.b); MCLL
  • Ohio v Lumer  (401.b), 570.1; I,24,100
  • Braden v Lady  (401.c); 276 SW2d 664 (Ky Ct of App 1955); ACLU
  • Stein v US  (401.d), 570.2; I,24,100; cd 351 US 943 (1956)
  • Matter of Newbern  401.1; IV,106
  • California v Linhart  401.2; VI,66,118
  • Re Aaron Wagman  401.3; VI,118
  • Fernandez v US  401.4; VIII,105; 314 F2d 289 (CA 9 1963)
  • Lambert v Florida  401.5; VIII,106—IX,54; 151 So2d 675 (Fla Dist Ct of App 1964)
  • Mastrian v Minnesota  401.6; VIII,136—IX,18; 122 NW2d 621 (Minn Sup Ct 1963), cd 375 US 942 (1963)
  • Jones v Grimes  401.7; IX,54; 134 SE2d 790 (Ga Sup Ct 1964)
  • Altobella v District Ct  401.8; IX,54; 385 P2d 663 (Colo Sup Ct 1963)
  • Gaar v Muni Ct  401.9; IX,55; MCLL
  • California v Sims  401.10; IX,55
  • US v Piper  401.12; IX,100; 227 FSupp 735 (ND Tex 1964)
  • White v US  401.13; IX,100; 330 F2d 811 (CA 8 1964)
  • Johnson v Davis  401.14; X,45
  • Wade v Alabama  401.15; X,45; 166 So2d 739 (Ala Ct of App 1964)
  • California v Allen  401.16; X,45
  • US v Hinton  401.17; X,115,150; 238 FSupp 230 (DC DC 1965)
  • Palmer v Dist Court  401.18; X,115; 398 P2d 435 (Colo Sup Ct 1965)
  • Thomas v Gladden  401.19; X,115,150; 397 P2d 836 (Ore Sup Ct 1964)
  • Aronson v May  401.20; X,115,150; 85 SCt 3 (1964)
  • Bowman v US  401.21; X,115,150; 85 SCt 232 (1964)
  • Rehman v California  401.22; X,115; 85 SCt 8 (1964)
  • California v Savio  401.23; X,116,150
  • In re Goines, Levine  401.23a; XI,29; MCLL
  • Noble, Peters v Berkeley-Albany Municipal Ct  401.23b; XI,29; MCLL
  • New York v Hutchinson  401.24; XI,29,90
  • Pelletier v US  401.25; XI,90; 343 F2d 322 (CA DC 1965), 350 F2d 727 (CA DC 1965); MCLL
  • Carmichael v Allen  401.26; XII,46; 267 FSupp 985 (ND Ga 1967)
  • Muller v Johnson  401.27; XIII,107; MCLL
  • New York v Shakur  401.28; XIV,99
402. Conditions Imposed
  • Nukk v Shaughnessy  (402.a), 570.3; I,24—III,31; 125 FSupp 498 (SD NY), rev'd and rem 350 US 869 (1955)
  • Resnikoff v Horton  (402.b), 570.4, 540.4; I,45,61
  • US v Witkovich  (402.c), 540.5; I,45,99; 140 FSupp 815 (ND Ill 1956)
  • Sentner v Colarelli  (402.d), 540.6; I,61; 145 FSupp 569 (ED Mo 1956)
  • New Hampshire v Valrand  402.1; VII,50; 176 A2d 189 (NH Sup Ct 1961)
  • US v Dumeur  402.6; VIII,106; 214 FSupp 293 (SD NY 1963)
  • Pennsylvania ex rel Alberti v Boyle  402.7; IX,55; 195 A2d 97 (Pa Sup Ct 1963)
  • Mathis v Starr  402.8; IX,55; 152 So2d 161 (Fla Sup Ct 1963)
  • Butler v Crumlish  402.9; IX,100; 229 FSupp 565 (ED Pa 1964)
  • Morris v Crumlish, sub nom Rigney v Hendrick  402.10; X,116—XII,46; 355 F2d 710 (CA 3 1965), cd 384 US 975 (1966); MCLL
  • California v Sparks  402.11; XIII,107
403. Denial of Bail
  • Clark v US  (403.a), 74 SCt 357 (1953)
  • Herzog v US  (403.1); 75 SCt 349 (1955)
  • New Jersey v Konigsberg  403.2; VI,31; 164 A2d 740 (NJ Sup Ct 1960)
  • Bandy v US  403.3; VI,66; 364 US 477 (1960)
  • Cohen v US  403.4; VII,50,113; 297 F2d 760 (CA 9 1962), cd 369 US 865 (1962)
  • Carbo v US  403.5; VII,85; 288 F2d 282, 686 (CA 9 1961), 369 US 868 (1962)
  • Sica v US  403.6; VII,85; 300 F2d 889 (CA 9 1962), 82 US 669 (1962)
  • Leigh v US  403.7; VII,113; 82 SCt 994 (1962)
  • Mississippi v Taylor and Donaldson  403.8; VIII,81
  • Mathis v Starr  403.9; VIII,106
  • Jimenez v Aristquieta  403.10; VIII,106; 314 F2d 649 (CA 5 1963)
  • Smaldone v Colorado  403.11; IX,55; 385 P2d 127 (Colo Sup Ct 1963)
  • California v Gaston  403.12; IX,100
  • New York ex rel Revo v Noble  403.13; X,46
  • McKinley v Johnson  403.14; X,150; 401 P2d 1007 (Okla Ct of Crim App 1965)
  • Alcorcha v California  403.15; XI,90
  • Louisiana v Wyche  403.16; XII,47
  • Louisiana v Wyche  403.16a; XII,47
  • Brown v Fogel  403.17; XIII,107—XIV,100; 387 F2d 692 (CA 4 1967), cd 390 US 1045 (1968); MCLL
  • Brussel v US  403.18; XIV,100; 396 US 1229 (1969)
  • In re Newton  403.19; XIV,100; I ACQ 18
  • Sellers v US  403.20, 403.18; XIV,100; 6 NDL 235:225; 89 SCt 36 (1968), cd 395 US 950 (1969)
404. Miscellaneous Bail Problems
  • Persons v Summers  404.1; IX,55; 151 S2d 210 (Ala Sup Ct 1963)
  • United Bonding Insurance Co v Mississippi  404.2; X,151; 175 So2d 182 (Miss Sup Ct 1965)
  • Re Petition for Release on Own Recognizance (Watts)  404.3; XI,30
  • Alabama v Collins  404.4; XII,47—XIII,107
405. Fines (and 468)
  • New York v Landerway, McMillan  405.1; XIII, 107; 279 NYS2d 941 (NY Sup Ct 1967)
410. CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT (and 304, 461)
411. In Criminal Cases/Prison Conditions (and 151, 394, 461, 557, 580, 590)
  • Williams v Steele  (411.a); cd 344 US 822 (1952); ACLU
  • Wetzel v Harpole & Williams  (411.b); cd 355 US 848 (1957); ACLU
  • California v Wolfe  (411.c); MCLL
  • In re Richard Gilcrease  (411.d); MCLL
  • Ohio v Hashmall  (411.e), 580.1; I,24,45; 117 NE2d 606 (Ohio Sup Ct 1954), cd 348 US 842 (1954); See Ohio ex rel Judge Wanamaker v Miller, 164 OS 174, 176 (Ohio Sup Ct 1955); MCLL
  • Minnesota ex rel Horowitz, alias Brown, v Jones  411.1, 580.2; I,25—II,21; 71 NW2d 839 (Minn Sup Ct 1955)
  • US v Green and Winston  411.2; II,21—III,82; 356 US 165 (1958)
  • Thompson v US  411.3; II,78—IV,106; 261 F2d 809 (CA 2 1958), cd 359 US 967 (1959)
  • Massachusetts v Pudeator  411.4; II,78
  • Thomas v Culver  411.5, 411.4; III,14—IV,58; 92 So2d 621 (Fla Sup Ct 1957), 253 F2d 507 (CA 5 1958), cd 358 US 822 (1958)
  • Petitions for McCord and Nickanorka  411.6; III,38; 151 FSupp 132 (DC Alaska 1957)
  • Wilson v Alabama  (411.f), 411.6; IV,25; 105 So2d 66 (Ala Sup Ct 1958)
  • Bunce v Williams  (411.g), 411.6; IV,58; 159 FSupp 325 (ED Mich 1958)
  • California v Blakeman  411.7; V,14,37; 339 P2d 202 (DCA Calif 1959)
  • Texas v Davis  411.8; V,37,89
  • US v Dunn  411.9; VI,31—VII,16
  • Newsom v California  411.10; V,60—VIII,33
  • US v Muniz  411.11; VI,31—X,116; 305 F2d 253 (CA 2 1962), 374 US 150 (1963)
  • Ex rel Wesley Robert Wells v Warden  (411.i), 372.63; XII,43; 234 FSupp 467 (ND Cal), 352 F2d 439 (CA 9), cd 384 US 1009 (1966)
  • Kennard v Mississippi  411.12; VI,66—VIII,81; 127 So2d 848 (Miss Sup Ct 1961), cd 368 US 869 (1961); 128 So2d 572 (Miss Sup Ct), cd 368 US 869 (1961); MCLL
  • Cobb v Georgia  411.13; VII,16—X,116; 126 SE2d 231 (Ga Sup Ct 1962), cd 371 US 948 (1963); MCLL
  • Butler v Ellis, Dir Texas Dept of Corrections  411.15; VII,50; 6 RRLR 454 (DC Tex 1961)
  • Robinson v California  411.16; VII,113; 370 US 660 (1962)
  • In re Solomon Foster  411.17; VIII,33,81
  • Re Jonathan Wagner  411.18; VIII,33
  • Fleishour v US Fedl Bureau of Prisons  411.19; VIII,81—XIII,107; 365 F2d 126 (CA 7 1966), cd 385 US 987 (1966); MCLL
  • Delaware v Cannon  411.20; VIII,81—X,46; 190 A2d 514, 196 A2d 399 (Dela Sup Ct 1963)
  • Virginia v Wansley  411.21; VIII,81—XIII,108; aff'd 368 F2d 71 (CA 4 1966); MCLL
  • Delaware v Balser  411.22; VIII,106—IX,55; 195 A2d 757 (Dela Sup Ct 1963)
  • Re Michael Andrada  411.25; X,116; cd 380 US 953 (1965)
  • Driver v Hinnant  411.26; X,116—XII,47; 243 FSupp 95 (ED NC 1965), vac 356 F2d 761 (CA 4 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Easter v District of Columbia  411.27; X,116—XI,90; 209 A2d 625 (DC Ct of App 1965), 361 F2d 50 (CA DC 1966); MCLL
  • California v Thomas Budd  411.28; X,116—XIII,108; cd 385 US 909 (1966); MCLL
  • District of Columbia v Phillips  411.28a; XIII,108
  • Michigan v Hoy  411.28b; XIII,108—XIV,100; 143 NW2d 577 (Mich Ct of App 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Dist of Columbia v Strother  411.28c; XIII,108; MCLL
  • Dunlap v Atlanta  411.28d; XIII,108; MCLL
  • Georgia v Burger  411.28e; XIII,108
  • Powell v Texas  411.28f; XIII,108—XIV,100; 392 US 514 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Seattle v Hill  411.28g; XIII,108—XIV,101; aff'd 435 P2d 692 (Sup Ct Wash 1968); MCLL
  • Budd v Madigan  411.28h; XIV,101; cd 385 US 909 (1966); 418 F2d 1032 (CA 9 1969)
  • Crawford v North Carolina  411.29, 411.24; X,116—XI,90; 133 SE2d 232 (NC Sup Ct 1963); MCLL
  • New York v Collins  411.31; XI,30; 261 NYS2d 970 (Orange Co Ct 1965)
  • US ex rel Johnson v Mississippi  411.32; XI,30
  • California v Ketchel, H B Sears, T E Sears  411.33; XI,90; 63 AC 859 (Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • California v Hernandez  411.34; XI,90—XII,47
  • Horvath v Milwaukee  411.35; XII,47; 143 NW2d 446 (Wisc Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 970 (1966)
  • Alabama v Mack  411.36; XII,47
  • In re "Joe Jones"  411.37; XII,47
  • Jordan v California  411.38; XII,48—XIII,109; MCLL
  • Louisiana v Hays  411.39; XII,48
  • US ex rel Marray v Louisiana  411.40; XII,48
  • Texas v Sutton  411.42; XIII,109
  • Brooks v Florida  411.44; XIII,109; aff'd 196 So2d 920 (Fla DCA 1965), rev'd 389 US 413 (1967)
  • Bitter v US  411.45; XIII,109; 374 F2d 744 (CA 7), rev'd 389 US 15 (1967)
  • Richmond v Odell  411.46; XIV,101; MCLL
  • Inmates of Cook Co Jail v Tierney  411.47; XIV,101; I ACQ 43; MCLL
  • California v Melkonian  411.48; XIV,101
  • Warren Wells v Madigan  411.49; XIV,101; MCLL
  • Jackson, Ernst, Mask v Bishop  411.50; XIV, 101; 268 FSupp 804 (ED Ark), vac and rem 404 F2d 571 (CA 8 1968)
  • Arkansas v Bruton  411.50a; XIV,101
  • Lane v Carberry  411.51; XIV,101; MCLL
  • Sostre v Rockefeller  411.52; XIV,102; MCLL
  • Alabama v Swain  (411.53), 512.Ala.5; IX,107—XIV,102; 156 So2d 368 (Ala Sup Ct 1963), aff'd 380 US 202 (1965); 2nd pet cd 382 US 944 (1965)
  • Mississippi v Cannon  411.Misc.; XI,30—XII,48; aff'd 190 So2d 848 (Miss Sup Ct 1966)
412. In Rendition, Extradition Cases
  • Brown v Baldi & Georgia  (412.a); 106 A2d 777 (Pa Sup Ct), cd 348 US 939 (1955); ACLU
  • Pennsylvania ex rel Brown v Baldi  (412.b), 585.1; I,25; 106 A2d 777 (Pa Sup Ct), cd 348 US 939 (1955); ACLU
  • In re Cauthen v Reilly  (412.c); ACLU
  • In re Rev Delaine  (412.d), 585.3; I,46,62
  • Illinois ex rel Jones v Warden  (412.e), 585.6; I,82
  • Illinois ex rel Smith v Warden  (412.f), 585.5; I,82
  • New York ex rel Crenshaw v Ruthazer, Warden  412.1; II,21
  • Ohio ex rel Saunders v Warden, Mississippi  412.2; II,21
  • New York ex rel Reid v Ruthazer  412.3; II,21—V,37; 157 NYS2d 342 (NY Sup Ct 1956); MCLL
  • New York ex rel Horton v Warden  412.4; II,60
  • Re Frank Peterson  412.5; IV,25
  • Oregon v Aday  412.6; IV,58
  • New York v O'Neill  412.7; IV,58,106; 359 US 1 (1959); 182 NE2d 97 (NY Ct of App (1962)
  • In re Williams  412.8; IV,58—VII,50
  • Carbo v US  412.9; V,89—VI,66; 364 US 611 (1961)
  • In re Albert Owings  412.10; V,89—VIII,34; 176 A2d 60 (NJ Sup Ct 1961), cd 370 US 928 (1962)
  • In re Joseph O'Keefe  412.11; VI,31
  • New York ex rel Rev Cavers v Grasheim  412.12; VI,66—VII,16; 214 NYS2d 936 (NY Sup Ct 1961)
  • In re James Kersh  412.13; VI,119
  • In re Hinson  412.14; X,151
  • Ex rel Hogan v Ogilvie  412.15; XI,90—XIII,109; MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Seale  412.16; XIV,102
  • In re Rory Hithe  412.16a; XIV,102; MCLL
  • Matter of James Jiles  412.17; XIV,102; MCLL
413. In Civil Cases
  • De Silva v TWA  413.1; III,58
  • North Carolina v Perry  413.2; V,37; 108 SE2d 447 (NC Sup Ct 1959)
  • Connecticut v Jane Doe  413.4a; VII,51
  • Brown v Murphy  413.6; VII,51; 224 NYS2d 423 (NY Sup Ct 1962)
  • Levey v Murphy, NYC Police Commr  413.7; VII,51
  • New York v James  413.9; XIII,109
  • NY Narcotics Control Commn v Spadafora  413.10; XIII,109; MCLL
414. Capital Punishment (and 394, 411, 461)
  • Georgia ex rel Abrams v Smith, Warden  414.4; XIII,110—XIV,102
  • Bell v Pennsylvania  414.7; XIII,110
  • Tennessee v Harris  414.8; XIII,110
  • Crawford v Bounds  414.10; XIV,102; rev'd and rem 395 F2d 297 (CA 4 1968), cd 393 US 76 (1968)
420. DUE PROCESS/EQUAL PROTECTION FOR THE POOR
421. Social Welfare Programs-Local; Local Administration of Federal Programs (and 251, 254, 255, 261, 263, 346, 426)
ALABAMA
  • Smith v King  421.Ala.1; XIII,111—XIV,103; 277 FSupp 31 (MD Ala 1967), 390 US 903 (1968), 392 US 309 (1968)
ARIZONA
  • Ginn v Superior Court  421.Ariz.1; XI,31; 404 P2d 721 (Ariz Ct of App 1965)
  • Dews v Henry  421.Ariz.2; XIII,111—XIV,103; 297 FSupp 587 (DC Ariz 1969)
  • Allen v Graham  421.Ariz.3; XIV,103
CALIFORNIA
  • In re Turrietta  (421.Calif.a), 490.14; V,37—VI,120; aff'd 356 P2d 681 (Calif Sup Ct 1960)
  • Parrish v Civil Service Commn  (421.Calif.b), 421.Calif.a, 413.8; X,116—XIII,111; rev'd 425 P2d 233 (Calif Sup Ct 1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Anonymous Blind Mother  421.Calif.1; XI,31
  • Re Anonymous Cannery Worker  421.Calif.2; XI,31
  • Kern Co v Coley  421.Calif.3; XI,32; 40 CR 53 (DCA 1964), 229 CA2d 172 (DCA 1964)
  • Contra Costa Co v California Social Welfare Bd  421.Calif.4; XI,32; 40 CR 605 (DCA 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Clark  421.Calif.5; XI,31
  • California v E Simpson  421.Calif.6; XI,31,91
  • California v Geary  421.Calif.7; XI,32
  • In re Anonymous Student  421.Calif.8; XI,32
  • Dept of Mental Hygiene v Kirchner  421.Calif.9; XI,32; 388 P2d 720 (Cal Sup Ct 1964), vac & rem 380 US 194 (1965); 400 P2d 321 (Cal Sup Ct 1965)
  • Hercules v Dept of Social Welfare  421.Calif.10; XI,32—XII,49; MCLL
  • California v Ford  421.Calif.11; XI,91—XII,49; 236 CA2d 438 (DCA 1965), app dism'd 384 US 100 (1966)
  • Alameda v Espinoza  421.Calif.12; XII,49; hg den 243 CA2d 534 (Sup Ct 1966)
  • Spiller v Celebrezze  421.Calif.13; XII,49
  • Stallworth v California  421.Calif.14; XIII,112—XIV,103; MCLL
  • Bonner v Montgomery  421.Calif.15; XIII,112; MCLL
  • Brown v Hannon  421.Calif.16; XIII,112; MCLL
  • McPherson v Montgomery  421.Calif.17; XIII,112; MCLL
  • Wheeler v Montgomery  421.Calif.18; XIII,112; 296 FSupp 138 (ND Cal 1968); MCLL
  • Marshall v California  421.Calif.19; XIII,112—XIV,104; MCLL
  • Burns v Montgomery  421.Calif.19a; XIV,104; 299 FSupp 1002 (ND Cal 1968), 394 US 848 (1969); MCLL
  • Alexander v California Dept of Social Welfare  421.Calif.20; XIII,112
  • Diaz v Quitoriano  421.Calif.21; XIII,113—XIV,104
  • Damico v California  421.Calif.22; XIII,113; rev'd 389 US 416 (1967)
  • Howell v Dept of Social Welfare  421.Calif.23; XIII,113
  • Jenisch v Dept of Social Welfare  421.Calif.23a; XIV,104
  • In re Hernandez  421.Calif.24; XIII,113
  • Morris v Williams  421.Calif.25; XIII,113; 63 CR 689 (Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Navarro v Reagan  421.Calif.26; XIII,113
  • California v Lopez  421.Calif.27; XIII,113
  • California v Samuel  421.Calif.28; XIII,113; rev'd 245 CA2d 210 (Cal Ct of App 1966)
  • Alameda Co v Aberle  421.Calif.29; XIV,104; 268 CA2 424 (DCA 1968)
  • In re Pierce  421.Calif.30; XIV,104; MCLL
  • Matter of Rudolpho Lara  421.Calif.31; XIV,104
  • Gosney v California  421.Calif.32; XIV,104
  • Baserra v Bond  421.Calif.33; XIV,104
  • Re Mooney  421.Calif.34; XIV,102
  • Kerr v Montgomery  421.Calif.35; XIV,104
  • McCullough v Terzian  421.Calif.36; XIV,105; I ACQ 27; MCLL
  • Re Paynes  421.Calif.37; XIV,105; MCLL
  • Little, Ochinero v Montgomery  421.Calif.38; XIV,105; MCLL
  • Ivy v Montgomery  421.Calif.39; XIV,105; MCLL
  • Kaiser v Montgomery  421.Calif.40; XIV,105
  • James v Montgomery  421.Calif.41; XIV,105
  • Nuttall v Dept of Social Welfare  421.Calif.42; XIV,105
  • Ramos v Fare, Montgomery  421.Calif.43; XIV,105; I ACQ 43; MCLL
  • Matter of H  421.Calif.44; XIV,105
  • Matter of ES and JS  421.Calif.45; XIV,105
  • Muniz v Montgomery  421.Calif.46; XIV,106; MCLL
  • Loredo v Sierra View Hospital  421.Calif.47; XIV,106; MCLL
  • Paulson v Finch  421.Calif.48; XIV,106
  • Lewis v Montgomery  421.Calif.49; XIV,106; I ACQ 39; MCLL
COLORADO
  • Hinshaw v Dept of Welfare  421.Colo.1; XI,32; 403 P2d 206 (Colo Sup Ct 1965)
  • Fleming v Colorado State Bd of Educ  421.Colo.2; XI,91—XIII,113; MCLL
CONNECTICUT
  • Re Ida English  (421.Conn.1), 413.13; VI,67
  • Googe v Shapiro  (421.Conn.2), 413.4; VII,16
  • In re B v Shapiro  421.Conn.3; XII,49—XIII,114; MCLL
  • Shapiro v Thompson (Conn); Washington v Legrant (DC); Reynolds v Smith (Penn)  421.Conn.4; XIII,114—XIV,106; 270 FSupp 331 (D Conn); 279 FSupp 22 (DC DC); 277 FSupp 65 (ED Pa); aff'd 394 US 618 (1969); MCLL
  • McCall v Shapiro  421.Conn.5; XIV,106; 292 FSupp 268 (D Conn), aff'd 416 F2d 246 (CA 2 1969)
  • Solman v Shapiro  421.Conn.6; XIV,106; 300 FSupp 409 (D Conn 1968), aff'd 396 US 5 (1969)
  • McClellan v Shapiro  421.Conn.7; XIV,107; MCLL
  • Wilcynski v Harder  421.Conn.8; XIV,107; MCLL
  • Doe v Shapiro  421.Conn.9; XIV,106; 302 FSupp 761 (DC Conn 1969); MCLL
DELAWARE
  • Green v Dept of Public Welfare  421.Del.1; XIII,114; 270 FSupp 173 (DC Del 1967)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Brewer v Simmons  (421.DC.a); X,151
  • District of Columbia v Phillips  421.DC.1; XI,32; 347 F2d 795 (CA DC 1965)
  • Smith and Crowder v Dist of Col Bd of Commrs  421.DC.3; XII,49—XIV,107; aff'd 380 F2d 632 (CA DC 1967)
  • Matter of W  421.DC.4; XIII,114
  • Robinson v DC Bd of Commrs  421.DC.5; XIII,114—XIV,107
  • Harrell v Tobriner  421.DC.6; XIII,114; 279 FSupp 22 (DC DC 1967), aff'd 394 US 618 (1969)
  • Barley v Tobriner  421.DC.7; XIII,115—XIV,107; 279 FSupp 22 (DC DC 1967)
  • In re L P  421.DC.8; XIV,107
  • Matter of Guest  421.DC.9; XIV,107
  • Matter of Waldron  421.DC.10; XIV,108
  • Stewart v Washington  421.DC.11; XIV,108; 301 FSupp 610 (DC DC 1969)
  • Purvis v Washington  421.DC.12; XIV,107
FLORIDA
  • Cobb v Dept of Public Welfare  421.Fla.1; XIV,108
  • Smith v Dept of Public Welfare  421.Fla.2; XIV,108
  • Blackmon v Dept of Public Welfare  421.Fla.3; XIV,108
GEORGIA
  • In re Maeola Johnson  421.Ga.1; XI,32,91
  • In re Adine Colbert  421.Ga.2; XI,32,91
  • Anderson v Schaefer  421.Ga.3; XII,49—XIV,108; MCLL
  • Thomas v Burson  421.Ga.4; XIV,108; 300 FSupp 401 (ND Ga 1968)
ILLINOIS
  • Robinson v Johnson  421.I11.1; XIV,109; 296 FSupp 1165 (ND I11 1967), aff'd 394 US 847 (1969)
  • Alexander v Swank  421.I11.2; XIV,109
  • Metcalf v Swank  421.I11.3; XIV,109; 305 FSupp 785 (ND I11 1968)
INDIANA
  • Grubb v Kelly  421.Ind.1; XIV,109
  • Hopkins v Cohen  421.Ind.2; XIV,109; aff'd 374 F2d 726 (CA 7), rev'd 390 US 530 (1968)
IOWA
  • Polk Co v Whitfield, Smith  (421.Ia.1), 413.5; VII,16
  • Anderson v Black Hawk Co  421.Ia.2; XIV,109
LOUISIANA
  • New Orleans Welfare Rights Organization v Bonin  421.La.1; XIV,109
  • Lampton v Bonin  421.La.2; XIV,109; I ACQ 32; 299 FSupp 336 (ED La 1969), 304 FSupp 1384 (ED La 1969)
MAINE
  • Westberry v Fisher  421.Me.1; XIV,109; I ACQ 43; 297 FSupp 1109 (DC Me 1969)
MARYLAND
  • McCullough v Gardner, HEW  421.Md.1; XIV,110
  • Dandridge v Williams  421.Md.2; XIV,110; 297 FSupp 450 (DC Md), 396 US 811 (1969); MCLL
MISSISSIPPI
  • Holly Springs v McGee  421.Miss.1; XI,32—XII,50
  • Williams v Miss Dept of Social Welfare  421.Miss.2; XIII,115
  • Ward v Winstead  421.Miss.3; XIV,110
  • Kirkwood v Winstead  421.Miss.4; XIV,110
NEW JERSEY
  • Dept of Mental Hygiene v Judd  421.NJ.1; XI,32; rev'd 211 A2d 198 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • Re C  421.NJ.2; XIII,115
  • Matter of D  421.NJ.3; XIII,115
  • Re J  421.NJ.4; XIII,115
  • Re W  421.NJ.5; XIII,115
  • Matter of Camille P; Matter of Mary C  421.NJ.6; XIV,110; MCLL
NEW YORK
  • New York v LaFountain  (421.NY.a), 411.23; IX,18,100; 249 NYS2d 744 (NY App Div 1964)
  • Matter of G  421.NY.1; XI,91—XIII,115
  • Williams v New York  421.NY.2, 421.2; XI,91 — XII,50; rev'd 260 NYS2d 953 (NY Ct of Claims 1965), rev'd 269 NYS2d 786 (Sup Ct App Div 1966), aff'd 276 NYS2d 885 (NY Ct of App 1966)
  • Matter of P  421.NY.3; XII,50
  • Matter of C  421.NY.4; XIII,115
  • Bradley v Ginsberg  421.NY.5; XIII,116
  • Matter of Hernandez  421.NY.6; XIII,116
  • Re G  421.NY.7; XIII,116
  • Martinez v Catherwood  421.NY.8; XIII,116
  • Feliciano v Catherwood  421.NY.9; XIII,116
  • Re T  421.NY.11; XIII,116
  • Re T  421.NY.12; XIII,116
  • New York v Pickett  421.NY.13; XIII,116; 19 NY2d 170 (NY Ct of App 1967); MCLL
  • Snell v Wyman  421.NY.14; XIII,116—XIV,110; 281 FSupp 853 (SD NY), aff'd 393 US 323 (1969)
  • Turner v Barbaro  421.NY.15; XIV,110
  • Soto v Wyman  421.NY.16; XIV,110
  • Bennet v Barbaro  421.NY.17; XIV,110
  • Catalano v NYC Dept of Hospitals  421.NY.18; XIV,111; 299 FSupp 166 (SD NY 1969)
  • Day v Wyman  421.NY.19; XIV,111
  • Bryant v Wyman  421.NY.20; XIV,111; 419 F2d 109 (ED NY 1968)
  • King v Kurtis  421.NY.21; XIV,111
  • Royal v Wyman  421.NY.22; XIV,111
  • Kelly v Wyman; Sheafe v Wyman  421.NY.23; XIV,111; 294 FSupp 893 (SD NY 1968)
  • James v Goldberg  421.NY.24; XIV,111; 302 FSupp 478 (SD NY 1969), 303 FSupp 935 (SD NY 1969); MCLL
  • Matter of Magdelena M  421.NY.25; XIV,111
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Scott v Dept of Public Welfare  421.NC.1; XI,33
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Jordan v Rosenn  421.Pa.1; XIII,116
  • Smith v Reynolds  421.Pa.2; XIII,117; 277 FSupp 65 (ED Pa 1967)
  • Waggoner v Rosenn  421.Pa.3; XIII,117—XIV,111; 286 FSupp 275 (ED Pa 1967), vac and rem 394 US 846 (1969)
  • In re Byrdsoll  421.Pa.4; XIV,112
TEXAS
  • Robinson v Hackney  421.Tex.1; XIV,112; 307 FSupp 1249 (SD Tex), app dism'd 397 US 1082 (1969); MCLL
  • Rios v Hackney  421.Tex.2; XIV,112; 294 FSupp 885 (ND Tex 1967)
WASHINGTON
  • Lindsey v Smith  421.Wash.1; XIV,112; 303 FSupp 1203 (WD Wash 1969)
WEST VIRGINIA
  • McIntyre v Vincent  421.WVa.1; XIV,112
  • Powers v Vincent  421.WVa.2; XIV,112
422. Social Welfare Programs—Federal Problems (and 251, 254, 255, 261, 263, 346)
  • Nichols v Celebrezze  422.1; XI,33; 243 FSupp 921 (SD Iowa 1965); MCLL
  • Gray v Celebrezze  422.2; XI,33; 245 FSupp 718 (WD Va 1965); MCLL
  • Chernock v Celebrezze  422.2b; XII,50; 241 FSupp 520 (ED Pa 1965), 360 F2d 257 (CA 3 1966)
  • Steward v Bd of Educ  422.3; XI,33
  • Schmiedigen v Celebrezze  422.4; XI,91; 245 FSupp 825 (DC DC 1965); MCLL
  • Johnson v Arkansas Dept of Pub Welf and Ga Dept of Family and Children's Services  422.5; XI,91—XIII,117; MCLL
  • Matter of Mrs C  422.6; XII,50
  • Alabama v Gardner  422.7; XII,50—XIII,118; 385 F2d 804 (CA 5 1967), cd 389 US 1046 (1968)
  • Re Disability Benefits  422.8; XIII,118
  • Macias v Finch  422.9; XIV,112; MCLL
  • Georgia v Cohen; Matter of Petition of Georgia  422.10; XIV,112; MCLL
  • Marquez v Hardin  422.11; XIV,113
  • Perkins v HEW  422.12; XIV,113
  • Peoples v US Dept of Agriculture  422.13; XIV,113
  • Gruenwald v Gardner  422.14; XIV,113; aff'd 390 F2d 591 (CA 2 1968), cd 393 US 982 (1968); MCLL
  • Martinez v Gardner  422.15; XIV,113; 390 F2d 874 (CA 5 1968)
  • Berry v Hardin  422.16; XIV,113; MCLL
  • Muniz v Cohen  422.17; XIV,113; MCLL
  • Hernandez v Hardin  422.18; XIV,113; I ACQ 32; MCLL
423. Housing (and 256, 530—535.100)
ALABAMA
  • Alabama v Johnson  423.Ala.1; XI,33—XII,50; 173 So2d 817 (Ala Ct of App 1964), 173 So2d 824 (Ala Sup Ct 1964)
  • Lewis v Public Housing Authority of Talladega  423.Ala.2; XIII,119—XIV,113; 397 F2d 178 (CA 5 1968)
  • Richardson v Housing Authority of Bessemer  423.Ala.3; XIII,119
ARKANSAS
  • Housing Authority of Little Rock v Thompson  423.Ark.1; XIII,119
  • Thomas v Housing Authority of Little Rock  423.Ark.2; XIII,119; 282 FSupp 575 (ED Ark 1967)
CALIFORNIA
  • Fields and Ortiz v Sacramento Housing Auth  423.Calif.1; XII,51—XIII,119
  • Tyree v Pleasanton Housing Authority  423.Calif.2; XIII,119—XIV,114; MCLL
  • Johnson v Cotton  423.Calif.3; XIII,119
  • Western Addition Community Organization v Weaver  423.Calif.4; XIII,119—XIV,114; 294 FSupp 433 (ND Cal 1968); MCLL
  • Earl v San Francisco Housing Authority; Housing Authority v Kennedy  423.Calif.5; XIII,120
  • Hunter's Point Tenants Union v San Francisco Housing Authority  423.Calif.6; XIII,120
  • Potrero Hill Community Action Comm v San Francisco Housing Authority  423.Calif.7; XIII,120; 410 F2d 974 (CA 9 1969); MCLL
  • Whitfield v San Francisco Housing Authority  423.Calif.8; XIII,120
  • Martinez v Benjamin  423.Calif.9; XIII,120
  • Murrey v Tinkler  423.Calif.10; XIII,120
  • Lopez v Giunti  423.Calif.11; XIII,120
  • Rosales v Genovea  423.Calif.12; XIII,121; MCLL
  • Buckner v Azulai  423.Calif.13; XIII,121; 251 CA2d 1003 (La Super Ct 1967)
  • Richmond v Guillebeaus  423.Calif.14; XIII,121
  • Stenger v Anderson  423.Calif.15; XIII,121; aff'd 59 CR 844 (Sup Ct 1967)
  • Phillips v Davenport  423.Calif.16; XIII,121
  • Perales v Housing Authority  423.Calif.17; XIII,121; cd 389 US 1050 (1968)
  • Alger v Municipal Ct  423.Calif.18; XIV,114
  • Zaragoza v Skyway Realty  423.Calif.19; XIV,114; MCLL
  • Silas v Smith  423.Calif.20; XIV,114; MCLL
  • South of Market Residents Assn v San Francisco Redevelopment Agency  423.Calif.21; XIV,115; MCLL
  • Simons v Dorchester Hotel  423.Calif.22; XIV,115; MCLL
  • Earle v Lachelli  423.Calif.23; XIV,115; MCLL
  • Mendoza v Gonzalez  423.Calif.24; XIV,115; I ACQ 20; MCLL
  • Banks v Housing Authority of Oakland  423.Calif.25; XIV,115
  • Oakland Housing Tenants Union v Housing Authority of Oakland  423.Calif.26; XIV,115
  • Ford v San Francisco Housing Authority  423.Calif.27; XIV,115; MCLL
CONNECTICUT
  • Jensen v Salisbury  423.Conn.1; XIV,115
  • Simmons v Housing Authority of West Haven  423.Conn.2; XIV,115; hg den 250 A2d 527 (Conn Sup Ct 1968), 394 US 957 (1969)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Edwards v Habib  423.DC.1; XI,92—XIV,116; 227 A2d 388 (DC Ct of App 1965), aff'd 366 F2d 628 (1967), rev'd & rem 397 F2d 687 (1968), cd 393 US 1016 (1969); MCLL
  • Adams v Lancaster  423.DC.2; XIII,121
  • District of Columbia v First National Realty Corp  423.DC.3; XIV,116
  • Knox Hill Tenant Council v Washington  423.DC.4; XIV,116
  • Diamond Housing v Robinson  423.DC.5; XIV,116
  • Southall v Brown  423.DC.6; XIV,116; 237 A2d 834 (CA DC 1968), cd 393 US 1018 (1969)
FLORIDA
  • Williams v Everglades  423.Fla.1; XIV,116
  • Holloway v HUD  423.Fla.2; XIV,116; 418 F2d 242 (CA 5 1969)
GEORGIA
  • Williams v Housing Authority of Atlanta  423.Ga.1; XIII,121
  • Williams v Shaffer  423.Ga.2; XIII,121; 149 SE2d 668 (Ga Sup Ct 1966), cd 385 US 1037 (1967)
  • Sanks v Sanks  423.Ga.3; XIV,116
  • Tory v Auerbach  423.Ga.4; XIV,116
ILLINOIS
  • JOIN-Gutman Contract  423.Ill.a; XI,92—XII,51
  • Krizer v Feldman  423.Ill.1; XI,92; MCLL
  • Chicago v Feldman  423.Ill.1a; XI,92; MCLL
  • Bender v King  423.Ill.2; XI,93
  • Alexander v Chicago Housing Authority  423.Ill.3; XIII,122
  • Sampson v Davis  423.Ill.5; XIII,122; MCLL
  • Watkins v Chicago Housing Authority  423.Ill.6; XIV,116
  • Stewart v Chicago Housing Authority  423.Ill.7; XIV,117; 237 NE2d 463 (Ill Sup Ct 1968), vac and rem 393 US 482 (1969)
KENTUCKY
  • Louisville Housing Commn v Murphy  423.Ky.1; XIII,122
MARYLAND
  • Christian v Baltimore Urban Renewal and Housing Authority  423.Md.1; XIII,122
  • Waddell v Mazer  423.Md.2; XIV,117
MICHIGAN
  • Evens & Basso v Christian & Lane  423.Mich.1; XI,93
  • Detroit Housing Comm'n v McCullough  423.Mich.2; XI,93
  • Greenwood v Detroit  423.Mich.3; XIII,122; MCLL
  • Apartments Limited, Inc v Katz  423.Mich.4; XIV,117
  • Goodloe v Goodman  423.Mich.5; XIV,117; MCLL
  • Watts v Lyles  423.Mich.6; XIV,117
MISSISSIPPI
  • Re D Adams  423.Miss.1; XI,33
MISSOURI
  • St Louis v Golden Gate Corp  423.Mo.1; XIII,122; 36 LW 2296 (Mo Sup Ct 1967)
NEW JERSEY
  • Epperson v Housing Authority of Newark  423.NJ.1; XIV,117
NEW YORK
  • Himmel v Chase Manhattan Bank  423.NY.1; X,151; MCLL
  • Rocke v Marluted Realty Co  (423.NY.a), 423.NY.2; X,151—XI,93
  • Manigo v New York City Housing Authority  423.NY.2; XI,93—XIII,122; MCLL
  • Tarver v C & C Construction Corp  423.NY.3; XI,93
  • NYC Tenants v NYC  423.NY.4; XII,51—XIII,122
  • Strawder v New York City Housing Authority  423.NY.5; XIII,122; MCLL
  • Holmes v Housing Authority  423.NY.6; XIII,122—XIV,117; 398 F2d 262 (CA 2 1968); MCLL
  • Gregoriades v 55 Walker Corp  423.NY.7; XIII, 123
  • Nijen Realty v Smereczynska  423.NY.8; XIII, 123
  • Stanter Realty v Vargus  423.NY.9; XIII,123—XIV,117
  • Tenants v MRC Realty  423.NY.10; XIII,123
  • Hicks v Commission for Human Rights  423.NY. 11; XIII,123
  • Escalera v NYC Housing Authority  423.NY.12; XIII,123—XIV,117; 425 F2d 853 (CA 2 1968)
  • Marino v Fuller  423.NY.13; XIII,123
  • Portnoy v Hill  423.NY.14; XIV,117; 294 NYS 2d 278 (Binghamton City Ct 1968)
  • Vinson v Greenburgh Housing Authority  423. NY.15; XIV,117; MCLL
  • Grissett v Wyman  423.NY.16; XIV,117; MCLL
  • Hosey v Club van Cortland  423.NY.17; XIV, 118; 299 FSupp 501 (SD NY 1969)
  • Humphrey v NYC Housing Authority  423.NY.18; XIV,118; 294 FSupp 574 (SD NY 1969)
  • Nagler v James Meredith  423.NY.19; XIV,119
  • English v Huntington  423.NY.20; XIV,118; I ACQ 32
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Thorpe v Housing Authority of Durham  423. NC.1; XI,33—XIV,118; 148 SE2d 290 (NC Sup Ct 1966), vac and rem 386 US 670 (1967); 157 SE2d 147 (NC Sup Ct 1967), rev'd and rem 393 US 268 (1969); MCLL
  • Richardson v Housing Auth of New Bern  423. NC.2; XII,51—XIV,118; MCLL
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Barbee v Crane  423.Pa.1; XIII,124
  • Morrison v Hibbs  423.Pa.2; XIV,118
TENNESSEE
  • Hayes v Moore  423.Tenn.1; XIV,118
TEXAS
  • Quevedo v Collins  423.Tex.1; XIV,119; 414 F2d 796 (CA 5 1968)
VIRGINIA
  • Thodas v Alexandria Housing Authority  (423. Va.a); ACLU
  • Holt v Redevelopment & Housing Authority  423.Va.1; XIII,124; 266 FSupp 397 (ED Va 1966)
WISCONSIN
  • Junker v Housing Authority of Milwaukee  423. Wisc.1; XIV,119
  • Lewis v Housing Authority of Milwaukee  423. Wisc.2; XIV,119
  • Fitzgerald v Housing Authority of Milwaukee  423.Wisc.2a; XIV,119
424. Credit Problems (and 376)
  • Sills v Gotthilf  (424.a), 490.22; VIII,36—X,153; cd 375 US 79 (1963)
  • Correspondence School v Christian  424.1; X, 152—XI,33
  • Tupper v Holman  424.2; XI,33
  • Roberts v Rich  424.3; XI,33
  • Mississippi v M Gordon  424.4; XI,33—XII,51
  • Debtor v Collection Agency  424.5; XIII,124
  • Gibraltar Collection Agency v DeWitt  424.6; XIII,124
  • Loaiza v Justice Court  424.7; XIII,124
  • Public Finance Corp v Grecian  424.8; XIII,125
  • Moon v Morgan  424.9; XIII,125
  • Minneapolis Collection Bureau v Lockwood  424.10; XIII,125
  • Frostifresh Corp v Reynoso  424.11; XIII,125; rev'd 54 Misc2d 119 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1967)
  • Patient v Zovluck  424.12; XIII,125
  • Rodriguez v Winters Pontiac  424.13; XIV,119
  • M A M Inc v Garcia  424.14; XIV,119
  • Clark v Pan American Motors  424.15; XIV,119
  • Vanslayke v Williams  424.16; XIV,119; MCLL
  • Perez v Williams Ford  424.17; XIV,119
  • Laurentide Finance Corp v Creed  424.18; XIV, 119
  • Miller v Retail Adjustment Bureau  424.19; XIV,119
  • Star Credit Corporation v Price  424.20; XIV, 120; MCLL
  • Jones v Star Credit Corp  424.21; XIV,120
  • W T Grant Co v Walsh  424.22; XIV,120; 36 LW 2626 (DC NJ 1968)
  • Lawson v Mantell  424.23; XIV,120
  • McCallop v Universal Acceptance Corp  424.24; XIV,120
  • Sniadach v Family Finance Corporation of Bay View  424.25; XIV,120; 154 NW2d 259 (Wisc Sup Ct), rev'd 395 US 337 (1969)
  • Beltran v Cohen  424.26; XIV,120
  • Hebing v Household Finance Corp  424.27; XIV, 120
  • Budget Finance Plan v Franklin  424.28; XIV, 120; MCLL
  • American Plan Loan Co v Legal Aid Society of Alameda Co  424.29; XIV,120
424.100. BANKRUPTCY
  • Bankruptcy of Alaniz  424.101; XIII,125
  • Northwestern Mutual Ins Co v Ferris  424.104; XIII,126
  • Washington ex rel Bouton v Starr  424.106; XIII,126
  • Robinson v Blount  424.107; XIV,120
  • Matter of Cayer  424.108; XIV,120
  • In the Matter of Ostrer  424.109; XIV,121; 216 FSupp 133 (ED NY), rev'd & rem 393 F2d 646 (CA 2 1968)
424.200. UNINSURED MOTORISTS
  • Orr v San Francisco Super Ct; Alvarado  424. 201; XIII,126—XIV,121; 73 CR 830 (Cal Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
  • Werner v Orr  (424.202), 424.102; XIII,125
425. Warranties, Service (and 376)
  • Sadler v Paul King  425.1; X,152
  • Liberty Loan v Collins  425.2; XI,33
  • Laing v Occidental Life Ins Co  425.3; XIII, 126; 53 CR 681 (DCA 1966)
  • Re Southern Calif Water Co  425.4; XIII,126
  • Granizo v Matthews Television and Appliance  425.6; XIV,121
  • Lopez v Daly City Toyota  425.7; XIV,121; MCLL
  • Williams v Rank and Son Buick  425.8; XIV,121
  • Austin v Atlas Subsidiaries  425.9; XIV,121
425.100. UNEQUAL SERVICES
  • Wood v PG & E; Nunemaker v Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co  425.101, 425.5; XIII, 126—XIV,121; I ACQ 44; MCLL
  • Lewis v Washington Gas Light Co  425.102; XIV, 121; MCLL
426. Family Problems (and 372, 421, 560-564)
  • In re Anonymous Mother  (426.a), 413.9; X, 117
  • In re Higgins  426.1; XI,33
  • Re A  426.2; XII,51
  • Re B  426.3; XII,51
  • Anguis v Superior Court  426.4; XIII,127
  • Brasher v Brasher  426.5; XIII,127; aff'd 61 CR 136 (DCA 1967)
  • Re Raya  426.6; XIII,127; rev'd 63 CR 252 (DCA 1967)
  • Re Mendoza  426.7; XIII,127
  • Palma v Commissioner  426.8; XIII,127
  • Levy v Louisiana  426.9; XIII,127—XIV,122; aff'd 192 So2d 193 (La Ct of App), 391 US 68 (1968); MCLL
  • Glona v American Guarantee & Liability Ins Co  426.10; XIII,127; 391 US 73 (1968)
  • Munkelwitz v Hennepin Co Welfare Dept  426. 11; XIII,128—XIV,122; 150 NW2d 24 (Minn Sup Ct 1967), dism'd 392 US 918 (1968)
  • Re Support Orders  426.12; XIII,128
  • Re S  426.13; XIII,128
  • Re H  426.14; XIII,128
  • Re Cager  426.15; XIII,128—XIV,122; 248 A2d 384 (Md Ct of App 1968); MCLL
  • Williams v Essex Co Welfare Bd  426.16; XIV, 122; 238 A2d 474 (NJ Super Ct App Div), cd 393 US 881 (1968)
  • Re V  426.17; XIV,122
  • Matter of Blaine  426.18; XIV,122; 54 Misc2d 248 (Queens Co Family Ct 1967)
  • James v Barbaro  426.19; XIV,122
  • James v McLinden  426.20; XIV,122
  • Boone v Wyman  426.21; XIV.122; 412 F2d 857 (CA 2 1969)
  • Whitehead v Whitehead  426.22; XIV,123
427. Employment Problems (and 263, 346, 570-579)
  • Re Clarence Anderson  427.1; XI,34
  • Re Unemployment Insurance Benefits  427.2; XI,93
  • Carr v Industrial Commn  427.3; XI,93; 408 P2d 411 (Ariz Ct of App 1965)
  • Argo v Goodstein  427.4; XII,51; rev'd 228 A2d 195 (Pa Sup Ct 1967)
  • Reyna v Giumarra Vineyards Corp  427.5; XIII,128
  • Garcia v Municipal Ct  427.5a; XIII,128
  • Alaniz v Wirtz  427.6; XIII,128
  • Re DiGiorgio Corp  427.7; XIII,128
  • Re M  427.8; XIII,129
  • Carrero, Aleres v California Ink Corp  427.9; XIII,129
  • Torres v Leary  427.10; XIII,129
  • Powell v Zuckert  427.11; XIII,129; 366 F2d 634 (CA DC 1966)
  • Pettibone v Wineberger  427.12; XIII,129
  • Maryland v Wirtz  427.13; XIII,129; MCLL
  • Re Sahvel Inc  427.14; XIII,129
  • Mixon v Schultz  427.15; XIV,123
  • Cole v Heidtman  427.16; XIV,123
  • Local Union 300 v McCulloch  427.17; XIV,123
  • Atwood Aviation v Morley  427.18; XIV,123; MCLL
  • Spangler v Calif Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board  427.19; XIV,123; II ACQ 27;
  • Re Norman H Schiffman  427.20; XIV,123
  • Re Castillo  427.21; XIV,123
428. Miscellaneous (and 13, 57, 59, 490)
  • Robles v Gilroy Unified School Dist  428.1; XIII,129; MCLL
  • Bolton v Croft  428.2; XIV,124; MCLL
  • West End Neighborhood Corp v Stans  428.3; XIV,124; MCLL
429. Civil Disorders in Poverty Areas (and 54, 304)
  • Georgia v Def (Thomasville)  429.1; X,152
  • Re Watts: Death of 76-Yr Old Grandmother  429.2a; XI,34
  • California v Frye  429.2b; XI,34—XII,52
  • California v M Frye  429.2c; XI,34
  • California v 19 Muslims  429.2d; XI,34
  • Brooks, Lavine v Los Angeles Super Ct  429.2e; XI,34—XII,52
  • California v P Brooks  429.2ee; XII,51; MCLL
  • Re Maiman, Hawkins  429.2f; XI,34
  • Re Homer Ellis  429.2g; XI,35
  • California v Watkins  429.3; XI,93
  • California v Proctor  429.3a; XI,94
  • California v Robinson  429.3b; XI,94
  • California v Hylton  429.3c; XI,94
  • Watkins v Superior Court, Los Angeles County  429.4; XI,94—XII,53; cd 382 US 1010 (1965); MCLL
  • Alabama v Rioters (Birmingham)  429.5; XIII, 130
  • Arizona v X  429.6; XIII,130
  • Arizona v Y  429.7; XIII,130
  • Arizona v Rioters (Tucson)  429.8; XIII,130
  • California v Hall  429.9; XIII,130
  • California v Carter  429.10; XIII,130
  • California v Rioters (Fresno)  429.11; XIII, 130
  • California v 14 Negroes  429.12; XIII,131
  • California v Purcell  429.13; XIII,131
  • California v Rioters (Sacramento)  429.14; XIII,131
  • California v Rioters (San Bernardino)  429.15; XIII,131
  • California v Rioters (San Francisco)  429.16; XIII,131
  • Colorado v Rioters (Denver)  429.17; XIII,131
  • Colorado v Parolee  429.18; XIII,131
  • Hartford v Toules  429.19; XIII,131
  • Connecticut v 7 Whites  429.20; XIII,131
  • Connecticut v Rioters (New Haven)  429.21; XIII,131
  • District of Columbia v Rioters  429.22; XIII, 131
  • Florida v Rioters (Riviera Beach)  429.23; XIII,131
  • Georgia v Rioters (Atlanta)  429.24; XIII,131
  • Georgia v James  429.25; XIII,131
  • Re Pfc Richard Hunt  429.26; XIII,131
  • Illinois v Rioters (Chicago)  429.27; XIII,131
  • Chicago v Demonstrators  429.27a; XIII,131
  • Illinois v Nickolan  429.28; XIII,131
  • Indiana v Rioters (South Bend)  429.29; XIII,131
  • Iowa v Rioters (Des Moines)  429.30; XIII,131
  • Iowa v Rioters (Waterloo)  429.31; XIII,131
  • Kansas v Rioters (Wichita)  429.32; XIII,131
  • Louisiana v Jenkins  429.33; XIII,131
  • Maryland v Askins, Lewis, Lewis  429.34; XIII,131
  • Boston v 108 Defs  429.35; XIII,132
  • Michigan v Rioters (Detroit)  429.36; XIII,132; MCLL
  • Michigan v Rioters (Grand Rapids)  429.36a; XIII,132
  • Michigan v Rioters (Pontiac)  429.37; XIII,132
  • Minnesota v Rioters (Minneapolis)  429.38; XIII,132
  • Missouri v Rioters (Kansas City)  429.39; XIII,132
  • New Jersey v Rioters (Englewood)  429.40; XIII,132
  • John Smith v Spina, Kelly, DeSimone, Pontrelli  429.41a; XIII,132
  • New Jersey v Rioters (Newark)  429.43; XIII,132
  • Wynn v Byrne  429.44; XIII,132—XIV,124; vac and rem 390 US 197 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • New Jersey v Rioters (New Brunswick)  429.45; XIII,132
  • New Jersey v Rioters (Plainfield)  429.46; XIII,132
  • New Jersey v Bobby Lee Williams  429.47; XIII,133—XIV,124; I ACQ 51
  • New Jersey v Boggs  429.48; XIII,133
  • New Mexico v Lopez Tijera  429.49; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Albany)  429.50; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Buffalo)  429.51; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (East Harlem)  429.52; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Mt Vernon)  429.53; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Nyack)  429.54; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Peekskill)  429.55; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Poughkeepsie)  429.56; XIII,133
  • New York v Rioters (Syracuse)  429.57; XIII,133
  • New York v Wright  429.58; XIII,133
  • North Carolina v Rioters (Greensboro)  429.59; XIII,133
  • Ohio v Rioters (Cincinnati)  429.60; XIII,133
  • Oregon v Rioters (Portland)  429.61; XIII,133
  • Pennsylvania v Rioters (Erie)  429.62; XIII,133
  • Philadelphia v Ackerman  429.63; XIII,133—XIV,124
  • Pennsylvania v William Woods  429.64; XIII,133
  • Pennsylvania v Rioters (Pittsburgh)  429.65; XIII,133
  • Rhode Island v Rioters (Providence)  429.66; XIII,133
  • Re Benjamin Brown  429.67; XIII,133
  • Tennessee v Judy, Vance  429.68; XIII,133
  • Milwaukee v Groppi  429.70; XIII,133
  • Wisconsin v Rioters (Milwaukee)  429.71; XIII,134
  • Re Clifford McKissick (Milwaukee)  429.72; XIII,134
  • San Francisco v 16 Blacks  429.73; XIV,124
  • California v Jesse Davis; Davis v Pittsburg Justice Ct  429.74; XIV,124
430. DUE PROCESS FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS (and 24, 56)
  • Minnesota v Biron  (430.a); ACLU
  • Kentucky v Goben  (430.b); MCLL; ACLU
  • Riordan v Armstrong  (430.c); MCLL; ACLU
  • North Carolina v Thompson and Simpson  (430.d), 411.5; IV,58; "N.C. Kissing Case"
  • Trimble v Stone  (430.e), 403.1; VI,31; 187 FSupp 483 (DC DC 1960)
  • Re 16 Year Old  (430.f), 360.4; IV,56—V,12
  • Re Anonymous Juvenile  430.1; VII,114
  • California v Viohl  430.2; VIII,34,82
  • Benj Harris v Kennedy  430.3; VIII,34,137
  • Application of Gault  430.4; X,117—XIII,134; 407 P2d 760 (Ariz Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 387 US 1 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Kent v US  430.5; X,152—XII,53; 343 F2d 247 (CA DC 1964), rev'd and rem 383 US 541 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Illinois v Harden  430.6; XI,94—XIII,134; aff'd 222 NE2d 693 (Ill App Ct 1966), aff'd 232 NE2d 725 (Ill Sup Ct 1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Dillenberg v Maxwell  430.7; XI,95—XIII,134; 413 P2d 940 (Wash Sup Ct 1966), 422 P2d 783 (Wash Sup Ct 1967), cd 386 US 998 (1966)
  • Miller v Rhay  430.8; XII,53; 361 F2d 581 (CA 3 1965), cd 386 US 936 (1967)
  • Florida v Parker  430.9; XII,53—XIII,135
  • Scott v Maxwell  430.10; XII,53—XIII,135
  • In re Yulbritton Collins  430.12; XII,53
  • New York v Johnson  430.13; XII,53—XIII,135
  • Re Crigler  430.14; XII,53—XIII,135
  • In re Macidon  430.15; XII,53
  • In re Castro  430.16; XIII,135; rev'd 52 CR 469 (DCA 1966)
  • Wilson v Chastain  430.17; XIII,135
  • Georgia v McCoy  430.18; XIII,135
  • In re Brown  430.19; XIII,135
  • Smith v McCravy  430.20; XIII,135; MCLL
  • Re 18 yr old Pl  430.21; XIII,135
  • Re Thomas, Newell  430.22; XIII,135
  • Mikell v Mississippi  430.23; XIII,135
  • New Jersey v Carlo  430.24; XIII,135; 225 A2d 110 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • Madera v NYC Bd of Educ  430.25; XIII,136—XIV,125; 267 FSupp 356 (SD NY 1967), rev'd and vac 386 F2d 778 (CA 2 1967), cd 390 US 1028 (1968); MCLL
  • Cosme v NYC Bd of Educ  430.26; XIII,136; 270 NYS2d 231 (Sup Ct 1966), 281 NYS2d 368 (Ct of App 1967), 281 NYS2d 970 (Ct of App 1967)
  • Matter of Goldwyn  430.27; XIII,136; MCLL
  • In re Whittington  430.28; XIII,136—XIV,125; aff'd 233 NE2d 333 (Ohio Ct of App 1967), vac and rem 391 US 341 (1968); 245 NE2d 364 (Ohio Ct of App 1969)
  • Beauford v Pennsylvania  430.29; XIII,136
  • Gonzales v Mailliard  430.30; XIV,125
  • In re Willie M Brook  430.31; XIV,125; MCLL
  • Re Wong  430.32; XIV,125; MCLL
  • Re Heninger  430.33; XIV,125
  • Guassardo v Glass  430.34; XIV,125
  • Dye v Davis  430.35; XIV,125
  • Young v Joiner  430.36; XIV,126
  • Matter of Adolph Harris  430.37; XIV,126
  • Dryden v Kentucky  430.38; XIV,126; rev'd 435 SW2d 457 (Ky Ct of App 1968); MCLL
  • Re Loyd  430.39; XIV,126
  • White v Carroll  430.40; XIV,126
  • Gomez v Texas  430.41; XIV,125
  • Smith v Turman  430.42; XIV,126
  • Reed v Duter  430.44; XIV,126; 296 FSupp 588 (WD Wisc 1969), rev'd 416 F2d 744 (CA 7 1969)
  • Re William Price  430.45; XIV,126
  • DeBacker v Brainard  430.47; XIV,126; 161 NW2d 508 (Neb Sup Ct 1968), 396 US 28 (1969)
440. DUE PROCESS FOR INCOMPETENTS
  • Andrews v Kansas  (440.a); 368 US 868 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Howard Liquia  (440.b)
  • Massey v Moore  (440.c); 205 F2d 665 (CA 5), rev'd 348 US 105 (1954)
  • Greenwood v US  (440.d); 125 FSupp 777 (WD Mo), 219 F2d 376 (CA 8), aff'd 350 US 366 (1956)
  • Re Mae Dean  (440.e), 420.1; V,90
  • New York v Codarre  440.1; VII,17—XII,54; 223 NYS2d 457 (NY Ct of App 1961), 237 NYS2d 389 (Dutchess Co Ct 1963), 245 NYS2d 81 (Sup Ct 1963), 251 NYS2d 676 (NY Ct of App 1964), cd 379 US 883 (1964); 363 F2d 961 (CA 2 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Lynch v Overholzer  440.2; VII,17,114; 369 US 705 (1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York ex rel Rosario v Officials, Matteawan State Hospital for Criminal Insane  440.3; VIII,34
  • Millard v Cameron  440.4; XI,95; 373 F2d 468 (CA DC 1966), 406 F2d 964 (CA DC 1968)
  • New Jersey v LeVien  440.5; XI,95; 196 A2d 546 (Super Ct NJ 1963), 209 A2d 97 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • Pennsylvania v Harris  440.6; XI,95; MCLL; ACLU
  • Kaminstein v Brooklyn State Hospital  440.7, 411.41; XI,95—XII,48; 266 NYS2d 916 (Kings Co Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • Jobson v Henne  440.8; XI,95; rev'd 335 F2d 192 (CA 2 1965)
  • Rees v Peyton  440.9; XII,54; 225 FSupp 507 (ED Va), 341 F2d 859 (CA 4), 384 US 312 (1966)
  • US v Charles Freeman  440.10; XII,54; 357 F2d 606 (CA 2 1966)
  • Louisiana ex rel Jenkins v Gov Davis  440.11; XII,54
  • Culbertson v Santa Clara Co  440.12; XIII,136; 67 CR 752 (DCA 1968)
  • Hartmann v Lund  440.13; XIII,136; 152 NW2d 514 (Minn Sup Ct 1967), cd 390 US 967 (1967)
  • Johnston v Minnesota  440.14; XIII,137
  • In re Buttonow  440.15; XIII,137; 276 NYS2d 771 (Sup Ct 1966), 285 NYS2d 223 (Sup Ct 1967), 297 NYS2d 97 (NY Ct of App 1968)
  • Rascon v Free  440.16; XIII,137
450. POST CONVICTION REMEDIES
451. In State Courts in State Cases
  • Otsuka v Hite  451.1; VIII,35,82
  • Eyman v Mahoney  451.2; X,47
  • Sam v Baldwin  451.3; XII,54
  • In re Cleophas Tobe Brown  451.4; XIV,127; I ACQ 48; MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Gonzales  451.5; XIV,127; 59 CR 687 (DCA 1967), 67 CR 551 (Cal Sup Ct 1968), cd 393 US 1055 (1969); MCLL
  • Johnson v Bennett  451.6; XIV,127; 267 NW2d 91 (Ia Sup Ct 1966), 386 F2d 677 (CA 8 1967), rev'd 393 US 253 (1968); 414 F2d 50 (CA 8 1969)
452. In Federal Courts in State Cases (and 512)
  • Lott v US  (452.a); MCLL
  • Fay v Noia  452.1; VII,114—X,47; 300 F2d 345 (CA 2 1962), 372 US 391 (1963)
  • Mattox v Sacks  452.2; VII,114—VIII,35; 176 NE2d 221 (Ohio Sup Ct 1961), cd 369 US 656 (1962)
  • US ex rel Kapatos v Officials, NYC Prison  452.3; VIII,35
  • US ex rel Robt Weber v Green Haven Prison Warden  452.4; VIII,82
  • Jones v Cunningham  452.5; VIII,82; 371 US 236 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Townsend v Sain  452.6; VIII,82—IX,56; 372 US 293 (1963)
  • US ex rel Durocher v LaVallee  452.7; IX,101—XI,35; 330 F2d 303 (CA 2 1964), cd 377 US 998 (1964)
  • US ex rel Walker v LaVallee  452.8; IX,101; 224 FSupp 661 (ND NY 1963)
  • Aaron v Alabama  452.9; X,117—XI,35; 122 So2d 360 (Ala Sup Ct 1960), 139 So2d 309 (Ala Sup Ct 1961), 155 So2d 334 (Ala Sup Ct 1963), cd 375 US 989 (1963); 214 So2d 327 (Ala Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
  • Dutton v Mosley  452.10; XIII,137; 367 F2d 913 (CA 5 1966), cd 387 US 942 (1967)
  • Moorer v South Carolina  452.12; XIII,137; 244 FSupp 531 (ED SC 1965), 347 F2d 502 (CA 4 1965), rev'd 368 F2d 458 (CA 4 1966)
  • Smith v California  452.13; XIII,137; 409 P2d 222 (Cal Sup Ct 1966), cd 388 US 913 (1967)
  • Evans v Dutton  452.14; XIV,127; rev'd and rem 400 F2d 826 (CA 5 1968)
  • Williams v Dutton  452.15; XIV,127; rev'd and rem 400 F2d 797 (CA 5 1968), cd 393 US 1105 (1969)
  • McMann v Ross, Richardson, Dash, Williams  452.16; XIV,127; 409 F2d 1016 (CA 2), 396 US 118 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • King v Cook  452.17; XIV,127; 287 FSupp 269 (ND Miss 1968), 297 FSupp 99 (ND Miss 1969), 298 FSupp 584 (ND Miss 1969)
  • Stiltner v Rhay; McConnell v Rhay  452.18; XIV,128; rev'd 393 US 2 (1968)
453. In Federal Cases
  • Colliflower v Garland  (453.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Sanders v US  453.1; VIII,107—X,47; 373 US 1 (1963)
  • Harris v Settle  453.2; IX,101; 322 F2d 908 (CA 8 1963)
  • Louisiana ex rel Williams v Hanchey  453.3; X,47,117
  • Holloway v US  453.4; XIV,128; rem 393 F2d 731 (CA 9 1968)
  • Boulden v Holman  453.5; XIV,128; 385 F2d 102 (CA 5 1967), 395 F2d 169 (CA 5 1968), rev'd & rem 394 US 478 (1969)
454. Compensation for Victims of Violence (and 304, 580)
  • Worthington v California  454.1; XII,55—XIII,138
460. SENTENCING AND CLEMENCY PROCEDURES
461. Sentencing Process (and 394, 411, 414)
  • Hill v US  461.1; VII,114; 368 US 424 (1962)
  • Wood v Denno  461.2; VIII,107—X,117
  • Rudolph v Alabama  461.3; VIII,137—IX,19; 152 So2d 662 (Ala Sup Ct 1963), cd 375 US 889 (1963)
  • California v Morse  461.4; IX,56; 388 P2d 33 (Calif Sup Ct 1964)
  • US v Behrens  461.5; IX,56; aff'd 375 US 162 (1963)
  • Maxwell v Stephens, Warden  461.6; X,47—XII,55; 229 FSupp 205 (ED Ark 1964), 348 F2d 325 (CA 8 1965), cd 382 US 944 (1965)
  • Mitchell v Stephens  461.7; X,48—XII,55; 327 SW2d 384 (Ark Sup Ct 1959), 337 SW2d 663 (Ark Sup Ct 1960), 346 SW2d 201 (Ark Sup Ct 1961), 208 FSupp 533 (ED Ark 1962), rev'd and rem 332 F2d 16 (CA 8 1964); 232 FSupp 497 (ED Ark 1964), 353 F2d 129 (CA 8 1965); 435 SW2d 91 (Ark Sup Ct 1968)
  • Michigan v Harper  461.8; XI,95—XIV,128; 136 NW2d 768 (Mich Ct of App 1965), 152 NW2d 645 (Mich Sup Ct 1967), dism'd 393 US 644 (1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Moore v Buchko  461.9; XI,95—XIV,128; 154 NW2d 437 (Mich Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
  • In re Small  461.10; XII,55
  • James Conway v California Adult Authority  461.11; XIV,128; 396 US 107 (1969); MCLL
  • Putt v US  461.12; XIV,128; 392 F2d 64 (CA 5 1968), cd 393 US 929 (1968)
  • US v Brown  461.13; XIV,129; 387 F2d 371 (CA 6 1968)
  • New Jersey v Laws  461.14; XIV,129; 242 A2d 333 (NJ Sup Ct 1968)
  • New York v Bailey, Leisen, McGraw  461.15; XIV,129; rev'd 21 NY2d 588 (NY Ct of App 1968)
  • New York ex rel Ruppert v LaVallee  461.16; XIV,129; 292 NYS2d 380 (NY Sup Ct 1966), cd 395 US 937 (1969); MCLL
  • US v Ginzburg  461.17; XIV,129; aff'd 383 US 463 (1966), vac and rem 398 F2d 52 (CA 3 1968)
  • North Carolina v Pearce  461.18; XIV,129; I ACQ 23; 145 SE2d 918 (NC Sup Ct), 151 SE2d 571 (NC Sup Ct), 397 F2d 253 (CA 4), aff'd 395 US 711 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Jane Daniel v Pennsylvania  461.19; XIV,129; rev'd and rem 243 A2d 400 (Pa Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
462. Applications for and Conditions of Probation
  • Faucette v California Dept of Corrections  462.1; XII,55—XIII,138
  • In re Peeler  462.2; XIV,129; 72 CR 254 (DCA 1968); MCLL; ACLU
463. Applications for and Conditions of Parole
  • Hendrickson v Pennsylvania St Bd of Parole  (463.a); MCLL
  • Richardson v Rivers  463.1; X,48; 335 F2d 996 (CA DC 1964)
  • Michigan v Mallory  463.2; XI,96—XII,55; rev'd and rem 147 NW2d 66 (Mich Sup Ct 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Michigan v Copeland  463.2a; XI,96—XII,55; rev'd and rem 147 NW2d 98 (Mich Sup Ct 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Puchalski v New Jersey State Parole Bd  463.3; XIV,130; 259 A2d 713 (NJ Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
  • Bailey v MacDougall  463.4; XIV,130; rev'd and rem 392 F2d 155 (CA 4), cd 393 US 847 (1968)
464. Applications for Pardons or Executive Clemency
465. Applications for Expungement or Certificates of Rehabilitation
  • Statman v Kelly  465.1; X,152—XII,55; aff'd 264 NYS2d 1008 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Bilick v Hogan, Dudley, Leary  465.2; XIII,138; MCLL
466. Parole and Probation Revocation (and 462, 463)
  • Gebhart v Gladden, Warden  466.1; XI,96—XIII,139; rev'd and rem 412 P2d 29 (Ore Sup Ct 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Register v US  466.2; XII,55; 360 F2d 689 (CA 4 1966), cd 385 US 817 (1966)
  • Mempa v Rhay  466.3; XIII,139; 416 P2d 104 (Wash Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 389 US 128 (1967)
  • Perry v Williard  466.4; XIII,139; rev'd and rem 427 P2d 1020 (Ore Sup Ct 1967)
  • California v Delles  466.5; XIV,130; rev'd 447 P2d 629 (Cal Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
  • Jack Johnson v Stucker  466.6; XIV,130; 453 P2d 35 (Kan Sup Ct 1969), cd 396 US 904 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Spells  466.7; XIV,130; MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Eldridge Cleaver; California v Cleaver; California Adult Authority v Solano Co Super Ct, (Cleaver, Real Party in Interest)  466.8; XIV,130; 266 CA2d 143 (Cal Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
467. Habitual Criminals
  • Spencer v Texas; Bell v Texas; Reed v Beto  467.1; XIII,139; 387 SW2d 411, 389 SW2d 304 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1965), 343 F2d 723 (CA 5), aff'd 385 US 554 (1967)
  • Specht v Patterson  467.2; XIII,139; 385 P2d 423 (Colo Sup Ct), 357 F2d 325 (CA 10), 396 F2d 838, rev'd 386 US 605 (1967)
  • Williams v Coiner  467.3; XIV,131; rev'd and rem 392 F2d 210 (CA 4 1967); 285 FSupp 397 (ND WVa 1968)
468. Imprisonment for Inability To Pay Fines (and 405)
  • New York ex rel Buffington v Martin  (468.a), 411.30; XI,30
  • US ex rel Martin v Erwin  468.1; XIV,131
  • Morris v Schoonfield  468.2; XIV,131; 301 FSupp 158 (DC MD 1969), 310 FSupp 554; MCLL
490. MISCELLANEOUS DUE PROCESS (and 295, 429)
  • Schroeder v New York  (490.a); MCLL
  • US v Marler  (490.b), 820.1; I,106
  • Kraus v Dulles  490.1; II,21; 236 F2d 840 (CA DC 1956)
  • US v Sharpnack  490.2; III,38,58; 355 US 286 (1958)
  • Anderson v Britton  490.3; III,58; 318 P2d 291 (Ore Sup Ct 1957)
  • Pauling v McElroy, Secy of Defense  490.4; III,82—VI,32; 278 F2d 252 (CA DC 1960), cd 364 US 835 (1960); MCLL
  • Pauling v McNamara  490.4a; VII,115—IX,102; 331 F2d 796 (CA DC), cd 377 US 933 (1964); MCLL
  • Farmer v Rountree, Dir of Internal Revenue  490.5; III,82—IV,26; 252 F2d 490 (CA 6 1958), cd 357 US 906 (1958)
  • Michigan v Vaughn  490.7; III,82—V,14
  • Re Szymczak and Dewyea  490.8; IV,26
  • Michigan v Hildabridle  490.9; IV,26,106; 92 NW2d 6 (Mich Sup Ct 1958); ACLU
  • Arkansas v Satterfield  490.10; IV,26,58
  • Ramos and Figueroa v Los Angeles  490.11; IV,26—V,37; (Ramos v California), 322 P2d 51 (Calif Ct of App 1959), cd 361 US 844 (1959)
  • De Veau v Braisted  490.12; IV,58—VII,17; 363 US 144 (1960); ACLU
  • Bradley and Hasselgren, ILA v Waterfront Comm of NY Harbor and Hogan  490.12a; VII,87—VIII,83; 220 NYS2d 681 (NY Ct of App 1962); MCLL
  • Cella Petition re Sacco and Vanzetti v Massachusetts  490.13; IV,80—XIII,140; MCLL
  • Motion by Cleveland Press for Order to Sheriff, Cuyahoga Co  490.16; VI,33; MCLL
  • Ferguson v Georgia  490.17; VI,92; 365 US 570 (1961)
  • New York v Spitaleri  490.18; VI,92; 212 NYS2d 53 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • In re Newbern  490.19; VI,92; 360 P2d 43,47 (Calif Sup Ct 1961)
  • Munoz v New York City  490.20; VI,92; 172 NE2d 535 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • In re Martin  490.21; VIII,36,83; 374 P2d 801 (Calif Sup Ct 1962)
  • US v Cook  490.23; IX,19—X,117; MCLL
  • New York v Scifo, Sanabria, DeCillis  490.24; IX,19,102; 250 NYS2d 558, 249 NYS2d 66 (Sup Ct, App Term 1964), 199 NE2d 380 (NY Ct of App 1964)
  • Giacco v Pennsylvania  490.25; IX,57—XII,56; 196 A2d 189 (Pa Super Ct 1963), rev'd 382 US 399 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • California v Collins  490.26; X,153—XIII,141; MCLL
  • Michigan v Thomas  490.27; XI,96—XII,56; MCLL; ACLU
  • Lewis v Aderholdt  490.28; XI,96; 203 A2d 919 (CA DC), cd 382 US 872 (1965)
  • New Jersey v Wolf  490.29; XI,96—XII,56; 216 A2d 586 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • Montgomery v Mims  490.30; XIII,140
  • California v Lande  490.31; XIII,140
  • Mississippi v Griffin  490.32; XIII,140
  • 38 Plaintiffs v Bullock Co Justices of the Peace  490.33; XIII,140
  • Watson v Maine Bank Commr  490.34; XIII,140; 223 A2d 834 (Me Sup Jud Ct 1966), 389 US 9 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • New York v Jett  490.35; XIII,140; 239 NE2d 645 (CA NY 1968)
  • Chicago v Love  490.36; XIII,140
III. EQUAL PROTECTION (Fifth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Fifteenth, Nineteenth, and Twenty-Fourth Amendments) (500-608)

500. ELECTIONS
501. Racial, Language Discrimination (and 51)
ALABAMA
  • Alabama v Tuskegee Civic Ass'n  (501.Ala.1), 501.6; III,14—IV,27
  • Gomillion v Lightfoot  (501.Ala.1a), 501.6a; IV,27—VI,33; 364 US 339 (1960); 6 RRLR 241 (MD Ala 1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Alabama  501.Ala.2; IV,27—XI,97; 171 FSupp 720 (MD Ala 1959), 267 F2d 808 (CA 5 1959), 362 US 602 (1960); 188 FSupp 759 (MD Ala 1960), 192 FSupp 677 (MD Ala 1961), 304 F2d 583 (CA 5 1962), aff'd 371 US 37 (1962)
  • US v Registrars (Montgomery and Sumter Cos)  (501.Ala.3), 501.17; V,92—VI,69; 6 RRLR 185 (ND Ala 1961)
  • In re Denkins (Montgomery and Sumter Cos)  (501.Ala.3a), 501.17a; VI,69; 285 F2d 430 (CA 5 1961)
  • US v Alabama (Bullock Co)  (501.Ala.a), 501.Ala.3a; XI,97
  • US v Alabama (Bullock Co)  (501.Ala.4), 501.19; VI,69—VII,115; 170 FSupp 63 (MD Ala 1959), 10 RRLR 697 (MD Ala 1965)
  • US v Atkins  (501.Ala.b), 501.Ala.8; VI,93—XI,36; 7 RRLR 1133 (SD Ala 1962), rev'd 323 F2d 733 (CA 5 1963), 10 RRLR 209, 704 (1965)
  • US v Penton (Montgomery Co)  501.Ala.6, 501.26; VII,19—XII,57; 212 FSupp 193 (MD Ala 1962), 236 FSupp 511 (MD Ala 1964), 11 RRLR 256 (MD Ala 1965)
  • US v Democratic Comms (Greene & Sumter Cos)  501.Ala.6b; XI,97—XIV,133; 254 FSupp 543 (ND Ala 1966)
  • Gilmore v Democratic Exec Comm (Greene Co)  501.Ala.6c, 501.Ala.21; XII,57—XIV,133; 368 F2d 328 (CA 5 1966), 370 F2d 919 (CA 5 1966), 1 RRLS 117 (ND Ala 1969)
  • Billingsley, Jr v Bailes, Jr, Ala State Democratic Exec Comm (Jefferson Co)  (501.Ala.7), 501.42; VII,89
  • Bruce v US Att'y Gen'l (Wilcox Co)  (501.Ala.8), 501.44; VII,115; 298 F2d 860 (CA 5 1962)
  • Kennedy v Bruce (Wilcox Co)  (501.Ala.8a), 501.44a; VII,115; 298 F2d 560 (CA 5 1962)
  • US v Executive Comm, Democratic Party (Dallas Co)  (501.Ala.c), 501.Ala.8a; XI,97—XIII,142; 254 FSupp 537 (SD Ala 1966)
  • US v Scarborough  501.Ala.9; VIII,38—XI,36; 348 F2d 175 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • US v Bd of Reg, Jefferson Co  501.Ala.10; VIII,137—X,49; MCLL
  • US v Cartwright and Alabama  501.Ala.11; IX,103; 230 FSupp 873 (MD Ala 1964)
  • US v Dallas Co  (501.Ala.d), 501.Ala.5a; X,48; 229 FSupp 1014 (SD Ala 1964)
  • US v Logue (Bd of Registrars)  501.Ala.12; X,49—XI,97; 9 RRLR 770 (SD Ala 1964), 334 F2d 290 (CA 5 1965)
  • US v Strong  501.Ala.15; XI,37,97; 230 FSupp 873 (MD Ala 1964), 10 RRLR 710, 1682 (MD Ala 1965)
  • US v Alabama  501.Ala.16; XI,37,97; 252 FSupp 95 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Alabama ex rel Wallace v Reynolds  501.Ala.17; XI,37
  • US v Alabama  501.Ala.17a; XI,37—XII,57; 382 US 889, 897 (1965)
  • Reynolds v Katzenbach  501.Ala.17b; XI,37,97; 248 FSupp 593 (SD Ala 1965)
  • Pls v Registrar (Lowndes Co)  501.Ala.18; XI,97
  • US v Executive Comm, Democratic Party (Marengo Co)  501.Ala.19; XI,97—XIII,142; 254 FSupp 543 (ND Ala 1966)
  • Gray v Main  501.Ala.20; XII,57—XIV,133; 291 FSupp 998 (MD Ala 1966), 309 FSupp 207 (MD Ala 1968); MCLL
  • US v Alabama Democratic Executive Comm of Barbour Co  501.Ala.23; XII,57; 288 FSupp 943 (MD Ala 1968)
  • Agee v Freeman, Dept of Agriculture  501.Ala.24; XII,57—XIII,142
  • Southern Christian Leadership Conference, SNCC v US Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service  501.Ala.24a; XIII,142
  • Barlow v Collins  501.Ala.25; XIII,142—XIV,134; 398 F2d 398 (CA 5 1968), 395 US 958 (1969), 396 US 925 (1969)
  • Brown v US  501 Ala.25a; XIII,142
  • Miles v Dickson  501.Ala.26; XIII,142—XIV,134; 387 F2d 716 (CA 5 1967); MCLL
  • Smith v Paris  501.Ala.27; XIII,142; 257 FSupp 901 (MD Ala 1966), 386 F2d 979 (CA 5 1967)
  • Re Bull'ock, Barbour, Macon Co Elections  501.Ala.28; XIII,142
  • Birmingham v Fields  501.Ala.29; XIV,134
  • Hogue v Auburtin  501.Ala.30; XIV,134; 291 FSupp 1003 (SD Ala 1968)
  • Hadnott v Amos (Etowah, Marengo, Sumter, Greene Cos)  501.Ala.31; XIV,134; I ACQ 23; 291 FSupp 309 (WD Ala 1968), 295 FSupp 1003 (MD Ala 1968), rev'd and rem 394 US 358 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • In re Herndon  501.Ala.31a; XIV,134; 295 FSupp 1003 (MD Ala 1968), 393 US 904 (1968), 394 US 399 (1969)
ALASKA
  • US v Alaska  501.Alaska.1; XI,97
ARIZONA
  • Apache, Navajo, Cococino Counties v Katzenbach  501.Ariz.1; XII,57; 256 FSupp 903 (DC DC 1966)
ARKANSAS
  • Hoban v Hall  (501.Ark.1), 501.10; IV,107; 316 SW2d 185 (Ark Sup Ct 1958)
  • Faubus v Fields  501.Ark.2; XII,58; 388 SW2d 558 (Ark Sup Ct 1965)
  • Bohannon v Arledge  501.Ark.3; XIII,143
  • Bynum v Burns  501.Ark.4; XIII,143—XIV,134
CALIFORNIA
  • Spanish-Speaking Political Assn v Calif  501.Calif.1; XII,58
  • Loredo v Reagan  501.Calif.2; XIII,143—XIV,134
  • Castro v California  501.Calif.3; XIV,135; 79 CR 645 (DCA 1969)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Hobson v Gasch  501.DC.1; XIII,143; 255 FSupp 295 (DC DC 1966), cd 386 US 914 (1967)
  • Powell v McCormack  501.DC.2; XIV,135; I ACQ 32; 226 FSupp 354 (DC DC 1967), 395 F2d 577 (CA DC 1968), 395 US 486 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
FLORIDA
  • Florida ex rel Barancik v Gates  (501.Fla.1), 501.38; VII,53,88; 134 S2d 497 (Fla Sup Ct 1961)
GEORGIA
  • Harris v Echols  (501.Ga.1), 501.3; II,44
  • US v Raines (Terrell Co)  501.Ga.2, 501.18; IV,27—VIII,37
  • US v Matthews and Chappell (Terrell & Sumter Cos)  501.Ga.2a; VIII,37—IX,57; 9 RRLR 225 (MD Ga 1964)
  • Pls v Registrars (Albany and Dougherty Cos)  (501.Ga.3), 501.24; VI,121—VII,115; 203 FSupp 806 (MD Ga 1962)
  • US v Bibb Co Democratic Exec Comm  501.Ga.4, 501.41; VII,89—VIII,84; 222 FSupp 493 (MD Ga 1962)
  • Bell v Southwell  501.Ga.5; XI,37—XIII,143; 11 RRLR 1360 (WD Ga 1966), rev'd 376 F2d 659 (CA 5 1967); MCLL
  • US v Southwell  501.Ga.5a; XI,37—XIII,143; 376 F2d 659 (CA 5 1967)
  • Morley v Tate  501.Ga.6; XIII,143
  • US v Johnson Co Democratic Executive Comm, Brantley  501.Ga.7; XIII,143
ILLINOIS
  • Skolnick v Kerner  501.Ill.1; XIII,143; 260 FSupp 318 (ND Ill 1966), app dism'd 387 US 91 (1967)
INDIANA
  • US v Krupa  501.Ind.1; XIV,135; MCLL
LOUISIANA
  • Reddix v Lucky, Registrar (Ouachita Parish)  (501.La.1), 501.4; II,79—VI,120; 252 F2d 930 (CA 5 1961)
  • Sharp v Lucky, Registrar (Ouachita Parish)  (501.La.1a), 501.5; II,79—V,14; 165 FSupp 405 (WD La 1958), aff'd 266 F2d 342 (CA 5 1959)
  • US v Citizens Council, Louisiana (Ouachita Parish)  501.La.1b, 501.27; VII,19—XI,37
  • US v Thomas (Washington Parish)  501.La.2, 501.11; IV,107—IX,103; 180 FSupp 10 (ED La 1960), 362 US 58 (1960); MCLL
  • Hannah v Larche  (501.La.3), 501.11a; IV,107—VII,52; 363 US 420 (1960); MCLL
  • US v Ass'n of Citizens Councils of Louisiana (Arcadia and Gibsland)  (501.La.4), 501.13; V,61—VII,52; 196 FSupp 908 (WD La 1961)
  • Edises v Cong Willis, Cong Walter  (501.La.5), 501.14; V,61; MCLL
  • US v Deal (E Carroll Parish)  (501.La.6), 501.20; VI,69; 6 RRLR 474 (WD La 1961)
  • US v Manning (E Carroll Parish)  501.La.6a, 501.22; VI,121—XI,37; 206 FSupp 623 (WD La 1962), 215 FSupp 272 (WD La 1963)
  • Anderson v Martin  501.La.7, 501.25; VII,19—IX,57; 206 FSupp 700 (ED La 1961), 375 US 399 (1964)
  • US v Fox, Louisiana (Plaquemines Parish)  501.La.8, 501.28; VII,19—XI,37; 211 FSupp 25 (ED La 1962), 334 F2d 449 (CA 5 1964), aff'd 381 US 436 (1965)
  • Perez v Rhiddlehoover  501.La.8b; XI,38,97; 247 FSupp 65 (ED La 1965)
  • US v Ward  501.La.9, 501.35; VII,20—XI,97; 222 FSupp 617 (WD La 1963), 349 F2d 795 (CA 5 1965), 352 F2d 329 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • US v Wilder (Jackson Parish)  501.La.10, 501.36; VII,53—IX,103; 222 FSupp 749 (WD La 1963)
  • Louisiana v US  501.La.11, 501.37; VII,53—X,153; 364 US 500 (1960); 225 FSupp 353 (ED La 1963), aff'd 380 US 145 (1965)
  • Carter v Registrar, Sheriff (St Francisville)  501.La.12; IX,19—X,49
  • US v Harvey; US v Palmer  501.La.13; X,49—XII,58; 9 RRLR 780 (CA 5 1964), 11 RRLR 260 (CA 5 1966), 356 F2d 951 (CA 5 1966)
  • Louisiana v Jackson, Williams  501.La.13a; XI,38—XII,58; 363 F2d 874 (CA 5 1966)
  • US v Palmer  501.La.14; X,49—XII,58; 230 FSupp 716 (ED La 1964), rev'd 356 F2d 951 (CA 5 1966)
  • US v Crawford (Red River Parish)  501.La.15; X,50; 229 FSupp 898 (WD La 1964), 9 RRLR 776 (1964)
  • US v Clement (Reg, Webster Parish)  501.La.16; X,50; 9 RRLR 772 (WD La 1964)
  • Georgetown v Schnebeler  501.La.17; X,153
  • Davis v Gallinghouse  501.La.18; XI,38,97; 246 FSupp 208 (ED La 1965)
  • Gallinghouse v Katzenbach  501.La.18a; XI,38—XII,58
  • Louisiana v Dawson, Martin, Johnson  501.La.19; XI,38—XII,58
  • Paynes v LeLee  501.La.20; XI,38—XIII,143; 239 FSupp 1019 (ED La 1965), rev'd and rem 337 F2d 61 (CA 5 1967); MCLL
  • Louisiana ex rel Gremillion v Roosa, Manning  501.La.21; XI,38
  • Louisiana ex rel Gremillion v Lucky  501.La.21a; XI,38
  • US v Louisiana  501.La.21b; XI,38; 225 FSupp 353 (ED La 1963), aff'd 380 US 145 (1964)
  • US v Harvey  501.La.22; XI,97; 250 FSupp 219 (ED La 1966); MCLL
  • US v Louisiana  501.La.23; XIII,143; 265 FSupp 703 (ED La 1966), aff'd 386 US 270 (1967)
  • US v Post  501.La.24; XIII,144; 279 FSupp 60 (WD La 1968), 297 FSupp 46 (WD La 1969)
  • US v Post; Wyche v Post (Tallulah)  501.La.25; XIV,135; 297 FSupp 46 (WD La 1969)
MICHIGAN
  • Taylor v Dearborn  501.Mich.1; VII,115—VIII,108; 120 NW2d 737 (Mich Sup Ct 1963)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Moses v Kennedy  (501.Miss.a); MCLL
  • Brief by Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party In re Credentials Subcomm of Demo National Comm, Demo National Comm, Credentials Comm of Demo National Convention, Delegates to Demo National Convention (1964)  (501.Miss.b); MCLL
  • Darby v Daniel (Jefferson Davis Co)  (501.Miss.1), 501.7, 501.34; III,59—IV,59; 168 FSupp 170 (SD Miss 1958)
  • US v Daniel, Mississippi (Jefferson Davis Co)  501.Miss.1a; VII,20—XI,38; 8 RRLR 154 (SD Miss 1963)
  • US v Duke, Reg, Mississippi (Panola Co)  501.Miss.2, 501.29; VII,19—XI,38; 332 F2d 759 (CA 5 1964); MCLL
  • US v Ramsey (Clarke Co)  501.Miss.3, 501.30; VII,19—XII,58; 331 F2d 824 (CA 5 1964), 353 F2d 650 (CA 5 1965)
  • US v Wood, Mississippi (Walthall Co)  501.Miss.4, 501.33; VII,19—X,50; 295 F2d 772 (CA 5 1961), 8 RRLR 1537 (SD Miss 1963)
  • US v Wood (Walthall Co)  501.Miss.4a, 501.33a; VII,19—X,50; 295 F2d 772 (CA 5 1961), cd 369 US 850 (1962)
  • US v Lynd (Forrest Co)  501.Miss.5, 501.39; VII,88—XI,38; 301 F2d 818 (CA 5 1962), cd 371 US 893 (1962); 321 F2d 26 (CA 5 1963), 334 F2d 13 (CA 5 1964), cd 375 US 968 (1964); 349 F2d 785 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Re Theron C Lynd (Forrest Co)  501.Miss.5a, 501.39a; VII,88—X,51
  • US v Ward, Cir Clk and Mississippi  501.Miss.6, 501.40; VII,88—XI,38; 345 F2d 857 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Kennedy v Lewis, and Reg (Bolivar Co)  501.Miss.7, 501.32; VII,19—X,51; 325 F2d 210 (CA 5 1963), cd 377 US 932 (1964)
  • US v Cox  501.Miss.8; VIII,39—XII,58; 206 FSupp 446 (ND Miss 1962), 314 F2d 767 (CA 5 1963), 11 RRLR 269 (ND Miss 1965)
  • Moses v Katzenbach, Hoover  501.Miss.9; VIII,84—XI,38; 219 FSupp 762 (DC DC 1963), aff'd 342 F2d 931 (CA DC 1965)
  • US v City of Greenwood  501.Miss.10; VIII,108—X,118
  • US v Edwards  501.Miss.11; VIII,108—X,51; 333 F2d 575 (CA 5 1964)
  • US v Ashford  501.Miss.12; VIII,138—X,51
  • Kennedy v Owen  501.Miss.13; IX,20—XI,38; 321 F2d 116 (CA 5 1963)
  • US v Holmes  501.Miss.14; IX,104—X,51; 377 US 988 (1964)
  • US v Mississippi  501.Miss.15; IX,104—XIII,144; 229 FSupp 925 (SD Miss), rev'd and rem 380 US 988 (1965); 256 FSupp 344 (SD Miss 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Gray v Mississippi, Gov Johnson  501.Miss.16; IX,104—X,153; MCLL
  • Gray v Johnson  501.Miss.17; IX,104—XI,38; 234 FSupp 743 (SD Miss 1964)
  • US v Coleman (Lauderdale Co)  501.Miss.18; X,52; 9 RRLR 1354 (SD Miss 1964)
  • Re Contested Elections of Mississippi Congressmen  501.Miss.19; X,118—XI,38; MCLL
  • US v Campbell (Sunflower Cc)  501.Miss.20; X,153
  • Hamer v Campbell  501.Miss.20a; X,153—XII,58; 345 F2d 787 (CA 5 1965), 358 F2d 215 (CA 5 1966), cd 385 US 851 (1966); MCLL
  • Hamer v Registrar  501.Miss.20b; XII,58; 358 F2d 215 (CA 5 1966), cd 385 US 851 (1966); MCLL
  • MFDP v Sunflower Town Elections Board  501.Miss.20c; XIII,144—XIV,135
  • Mississippi v Willis  501.Miss.21; XI,39—XII,58
  • US v Mississippi  501.Miss.22; XI,39,98; ACLU
  • Mississippi ex rel Patterson v Caves  501.Miss.23; XI,39; MCLL
  • US v Mississippi  501.Miss.23a; XI,39; rev'd and rem 229 FSupp 925 (SD Miss), 380 US 128 (1965); ACLU
  • US v Registrar (Rankin Co)  501.Miss.24; XI,98
  • Boyd v Johnson  501.Miss.25; XI,98; MCLL
  • US v Allen  501.Miss.26; XII,58; 11 RRLR 263 (ND Miss 1965)
  • Allen v Mississippi Elections Comm  501.Miss.27; XII,59—XIII,144
  • MFDP v Mississippi State Democratic Party  501.Miss.28; XII,59; 362 F2d 60 (CA 5 1966)
  • Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party v Ladner  501.Miss.29; XII,59
  • US v LeFlore Co  (501.Miss.30), 501.Miss.29; XIII,144; 12 RRLR 323 (ND Miss 1965), 371 F2d 368 (CA 5 1967)
  • MFDP v Johnson  501.Miss.31; XIII,144—XIV,135; 299 FSupp 93 (SD Miss 1969)
  • Hamer v Ely (Sunflower Co)  501.Miss.32; XIV,136; 410 F2d 152 (CA 5 1969), cd 396 US 942 (1969)
  • Whitley v Williams; Fairley v Patterson; Bunton v Patterson  501.Miss.32a; XIV,136
  • Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, Nat'l Conference for New Politics v Eastland, Sourwine  501.Miss.33; XIV,136; MCLL
  • Scrandall v Cage  501.Miss.34; XIV,136
  • Joliff v Wilkinson Co Bd of Supervisors  501.Miss.35; XIV,136; 210 So2d 47 (Miss Sup Ct 1969)
  • Adams v Ponder  501.Miss.36; XIV,136
  • Smith v McClellen (Holmes Co)  501.Miss.37; XIV,136
  • Dennis v Gantz  501.Miss.38; XIV,136
  • Walker v James (Grenada)  501.Miss.39; XIV,136
NEW MEXICO
  • Montoya v Bolack  501.NM.1; VI,121—VIII,39; 372 P2d 387 (NM Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
NEW YORK
  • Camacho v New York City Bd of Elections  (501.NY.1), 501.9; IV,28—V,91; 163 NE2d 140 (NY Ct of App 1959); MCLL; ACLU
  • Camacho v Rogers  501.NY.1a, 501.92; VI,34—IX,20; 199 FSupp 155 (SD NY 1961); MCLL
  • US v Sharrow  501.NY.2, 501.18; VI,35—VIII, 84; 309 F2d 77 (1962), cd 372 US 949 (1963)
  • Cardona v Power  501.NY.3; IX,105—XII,59; 209 NE2d 119 (NY Ct of App 1965), 384 US 672 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Morgan v Katzenbach  501.NY.4; XI,39—XII,59; 247 FSupp 196 (DC DC 1965), 10 RRLR 1707 (1965), rev'd 384 US 641 (1966)
  • In re O'Keefe v NY Co Bd of Elections  501.NY.5; XI,39—XII,59; 246 FSupp 978 (SD NY 1965)
  • US v Monroe Co Bd of Elections  501.NY.6; XI,39—XII,59; 248 FSupp 316 (WD NY 1965)
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Ivy v Cole, Registrar  501.NC.1, 501.2; II,22—VIII,138
  • Alston v Butts  501.NC.2; IX,105—X,52; 9 RRLR 1356 (ED NC 1964); MCLL
  • Lassiter v Taylor (Northampton Co)  (501.NC.3), 501.3; II,79—IV,81; 152 FSupp 295 (ED NC 1957); MCLL
  • Lassiter v Bd of Elections (Northampton Co)  (501.NC.3a), 501.3a; IV,27—V,37; 102 SE2d 853 (NC Sup Ct 1958), aff'd 360 US 45 (1959)
  • Bazemore v Bd of Elections (Bertie Co)  (501.NC.4), 501.16; V,92—VII,52; 119 SE2d 817 (NC Sup Ct 1961)
  • Gaston Co v US  501.NC.5; XIV,136; 288 FSupp 678 (DC DC 1968), aff'd 395 US 285 (1969)
  • US v Pate  501.NC.6; XIV,136; MCLL
OKLAHOMA
  • McDonald v Key  (501.Okla.1), 601.1; I,26,46; 125 FSupp 775 (WD Okla 1954), rev'd 224 F2d 608 (CA 10 1955), cd 350 US 895 (1955)
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • South Carolina v Katzenbach  501.SC.1; XI,39—XII,59; 383 US 301 (1966)
  • US v Clarendon Co Democratic Executive Comm  501.SC.2; XII,59
  • US v Democratic Executive Comm, Bd of Registrars  501.SC.3; XIII,144—XIV,136
TENNESSEE
  • US v Fayette Co Democratic Exec Comm  (501.Tenn.1), 501.12; V,15,61; 5 RRLR 421 (WD Tenn 1960)
  • US v 82 Defs (Fayette Co)  (501.Tenn.1a), 501.12a; VI,68,121; 6 RRLR 200 (WD Tenn 1960)
  • US v Defendants (Fayette Co)  (501.Tenn.1b), 501.12b; VI,68,121
  • US v First State Bank (Haywood Co)  (501.Tenn.2), 501.15; V,92—VII,88; 288 F2d 653 (CA 6 1961)
  • US v Beaty and Barcroft  (501.Tenn.2a), 501.15a; VI,68—VII,88; 288 F2d 653 (CA 6 1961)
  • Tennessee v Savage (Haywood Co)  (501.Tenn.2b), 501.15b; VI,69
  • Tennessee v Giltrow and Hawley (Haywood Co)  (501.Tenn.2c), 501.15c; VI,69
TEXAS
  • L E Smith v Allwright  (501.Tex.a); 321 US 649 (1944); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • US v Texas  501.Tex.1; XI,39—XII,59; 252 FSupp 234 (WD Tex 1966), aff'd 384 US 155 (1966)
UTAH
  • Allen v Merrill  (501.Utah.1), 501.1; II,22,79; 305 P2d 490 (Utah Sup Ct 1956), vac as moot 353 US 932 (1957); ACLU
VIRGINIA
  • Butts v Harrison (Norfolk)  501.Va.1; IX,20—XII,59; 240 FSupp 270 (ED Va 1964), rev'd 383 US 663 (1966); MCLL
  • Hamm v Virginia State Bd of Elections (Alexandria); Tancil v Woolls  501.Va.2; X,52,119; 230 FSupp 156 (ED Va 1964)
  • Harper v Virginia Bd of Elections  501.Va.3; X,119—XI,99; 240 FSupp 270 (ED Va 1964), rev'd 383 US 663 (1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • Haskins v Davis  501.Va.3a; X,153—XII,59; 253 FSupp 642 (ED Va 1966)
  • US v Virginia  501.Va.4; X,153—XI,39; MCLL
  • Allen v Bd of Elections (Va); [with Fairley v Patterson (Miss); Bunton v Patterson (Miss); Whitley v Williams (Miss)]  501.Va.5; XIV,137; Vac & rem 268 FSupp 218 (ED Vir), rev'd and rem 281 FSupp 918 (SD Miss), 282 FSupp 164 (SD Miss), 296 FSupp 754 (SD Miss), rev'd 393 US 544 (1969)
WASHINGTON
  • Mexican-American Federation v Naff  501.Wash.1; XIV,137; 299 FSupp 587 (ED Wash 1969)
502. Political Discrimination
ALABAMA
  • Lumpkin v Bd of Registrars  (502.Ala.1), 502.1; II,22
  • Amos v Nat'l Democratic Party  502.Ala.2; XIV,137
CALIFORNIA
  • Socialist Party v Jordan  (502.Calif.1), 502.3; II,61—III,83; 318 P2d 479 (Calif Sup Ct 1958), cd 356 US 952 (1958); 414 P2d 412 (Calif Sup Ct 1968); ACLU
  • Socialist Party v Jordan  (502.Calif.2), 502.4; III,15,83
  • Otsuka v Hite  502.Calif.3; X,154—XI,99; 414 P2d 412 (Calif Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • Jarris v Hite  502.Calif.4; XII,59
  • Westbrook v Mihaly; Larez v Shannon  502.Calif.5; XIV,137; II ACQ 15
  • Cleaver v San Francisco  502.Calif.6; XIV,137
  • California ex rel Jose Martinez v Lisher  502.Calif.7; XIV,137; MCLL
DELAWARE
  • Constitution Party v Delaware  502.Dela.1; XIII,144
GEORGIA
  • South v Peters  (502.Ga.a); 396 US 276 (1950); MCLL
  • Bond v Floyd  502.Ga.1; XI,99—XIII,144; 251 FSupp 333 (ND Ga 1966), prob juris noted 384 US 997 (1966); rev'd 385 US 116 (1966); ACLU
ILLINOIS
  • Mayhew v Bd of Elections  (502.Ill.1), 502.2; II,22,61
  • Briscoe v Holzman  502.Ill.2; XIII,145—XIV,137
  • Moore v Ogilvie  502.Ill.3; XIV,37; 293 FSupp 411 (ND Ill 1968), rev'd 394 US 814 (1969)
MINNESOTA
  • Mitchell v Donovan  502.Minn.1; XIV,138; 290 FSupp 642 (DC Minn 1968), 300 FSupp 1145 (DC Minn 1969); MCLL; ACLU
MISSISSIPPI
  • Mississippi v Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party  502.Miss.1; X,53—XII,59
  • Whitley v Mississippi State Democratic Party  502.Miss.2; XII,60
NEW JERSEY
  • Richardson v Caputo  502.NJ.1; X,39—XI,99; 214 A2d 385 (NJ Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
NEW YORK
  • McManus v DeSapio  (502.NY.1), 502.5; IV,28,107; 154 NE2d 143 (NY Ct of App 1958)
  • Davis v New York Bd of Elections  (502.NY.2), 502.6; IV,28,107; 153 NE2d 879 (NY Ct of App 1958)
  • Goldwater v New York Bd of Elections  (502.NY.3), 502.7; VI,35
  • Goldwater v New York Bd of Elections  (502.NY.4), 502.8; VI,35
  • People's Rights Party (NYC Bd of Elections)  (502.NY.5), 502.9; VI,35
  • In re Basil  502.NY.10; X,53; MCLL
  • Green v NY Bd of Elections  502.NY.11; XIII,145—XIV,138; dism'd 259 FSupp 290 (SD NY 1966), 380 F2d 445 (CA 2), cd 389 US 1048 (1968)
  • Ferguson v Lomenzo  502.NY.12; XIV,138
OHIO
  • Vincent Hallinan v Brown  (502.Ohio.a); MCLL
  • Washington v Cuyahoga Co Bd of Elections  (502.Ohio.b); MCLL
  • Brockington v Rhodes  502.Ohio.1; XIV,138; vac and rem 396 US 41 (1969)
  • Socialist Labor Party v Rhodes  502.Ohio.2; XIV,138; 290 FSupp 983 (SD Ohio 1968), 89 SCt 3,4 (1968)
  • Williams v Rhodes  502.Ohio.3; XIV,138; 290 FSupp 983 (SD Ohio 1968), 89 SCt 1 (1968), 393 US 23 (1968)
503. Urban Discrimination
ALABAMA
  • Sims v Frink  503.Ala.1, 503.9; VII,89—IX,105; 205 FSupp 245, 208 FSupp 431 (MD Ala 1962); MCLL
  • Alsup v Mayhall  503.Ala.2; VIII,109—IX,105; 208 FSupp 713 (SD Ala 1962)
  • Sims v Baggett  503.Ala.3; VIII,109—XI,40; 208 FSupp 431 (MD Ala 1962), 377 US 533 (1964); 247 FSupp 96 (MD Ala 1965); MCLL
CALIFORNIA
  • Silver v Jordan  503.Calif.1; VIII,40,84
  • Yorty v Anderson  503.Calif.2; VIII,109, 138; 384 P2d 417 (Calif Sup Ct 1963)
  • Silver v Jordan  503.Calif.3; VIII,109
  • Mutnick v Board of Supervisors (Contra Costa Co)  503.Calif.4; VIII,109
  • Griffin v Bd of Supers (Monterey Co)  503.Calif.5; VIII,138; 384 P2d 421, 388 P2d 888 (Calif Sup Ct 1963)
  • Coughlin v Bd of Supers (San Benito Co)  503.Calif.6; IX,58
COLORADO
  • In re Legislative Reapportionment  503.Colo.1; VIII,40—IX,105; 374 P2d 66 (Colo Sup Ct 1962)
  • Lucas v 44th Genl Assembly of Colorado; Lisco v McNichols  503.Colo.2; VIII,40—IX,105; 219 FSupp 922 (DC Colo 1963); MCLL
  • Ryan v Tinsley  503.Colo.3; VIII,109
  • Myrick v General Assembly  503.Colo.4; VIII,109
  • Re Legislative Apportionment  503.Colo.5; VIII,109
CONNECTICUT
  • Pinney v Butterworth  503.Conn.1; VIII,109—IX,105; 378 US 564 (1964)
  • Valenti v Dempsey  503.Conn.2; VIII,109
DELAWARE
  • Sincock v Terry  503.Dela.1; VIII,40—IX,105; 207 FSupp 205 (DC Dela 1962)
  • Roman v Sincock  503.Dela.2; IX,21, 105; 215 FSupp 169 (DC Dela 1963), aff'd 377 US 695 (1964)
FLORIDA
  • Lund v Mathas  503.Fla.1; VIII,40
  • Swann v Adams  503.Fla.3, 503.Fla.2; VIII,40—XIII,145; 208 FSupp 316 (SD Fla 1962); In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 150 So2d 721 (Fla Sup Ct 1963), 214 FSupp 811 (SD Fla 1963), rev'd 378 US 553 (1964); rev'd 383 US 210 (1966); 258 FSupp 819 (SD Fla 1967), rev'd 385 US 440 (1967)
GEORGIA
  • Helmsley v Wells  503.Ga.1, 503.2; VI,69—VIII,40
  • Gray v Sanders  503.Ga.2, 503.2a; VII,89—IX,58; 203 FSupp 158 (ND Ga 1962), pjn 370 US 921 (1962), 372 US 368 (1963)
  • Wesberry v Sanders  503.Ga.3, 503.2b; VII,89—XI,40; 206 FSupp 276 (ND Ga 1962), rev'd & rem 376 US 1 (1963)
  • Toombs v Fortson  503.Ga.4, 503.2c; VII,116—IX,105; 205 FSupp 248 (ND Ga 1962)
  • Morris v Fortson  503.Ga.5; XIII,145; 261 FSupp 538 (ND Ga 1966)
IDAHO
  • Caesar v Williams  503.Ida.1; VIII,40,109; 371 P2d 241 (Ida Sup Ct 1962)
  • Hearne v Smylie  503.Ida.2; VIII,109—IX,106; 225 FSupp 645 (DC Ida 1964), 378 US 563 (1964)
ILLINOIS
  • Germano v Kerner  503.Ill.1; VIII,139—IX,106; 220 FSupp 230 (ND Ill 1963), 378 US 560 (1964)
INDIANA
  • Grills v Anderson  (503.Ind.1), 503.4; VI,94
  • Stout v Hendricks  503.Ind.2, 503.7; VII,53—IX,21
  • Grills v Welsh  503.Ind.3; VIII,109—IX,21
IOWA
  • Selzer v Synhorst  (503.Ia.1), 503.10; VII,89; 113 NW2d 724 (Ia Sup Ct 1962)
  • Hill v Davis  503.Ia.2; VIII,40—IX,106; 217 FSupp 492 (SD Ia 1963), 378 US 560 (1964)
KANSAS
  • Harris v Shanahan  503.Kan.1; VIII,40—IX,58; 378 P2d 157, 387 P2d 771 (Kan Sup Ct 1963); MCLL
  • Meeks v Anderson  503.Kan.2; VIII,41
KENTUCKY
  • Schmeid v Combs  503.Ky.1; VIII,41
  • Combs v Matthews  503.Ky.2; VIII,41; 364 SW2d 647 (Ky Ct of App 1963)
LOUISIANA
  • Daniel v Davis  503.La.1; VIII,110
  • Bannister v Davis  503.La.2; XII,60—XIII, 145; 263 FSupp 202 (ED La 1967)
MARYLAND
  • Maryland Comm for Fair Representation v Tawes  503.Md.1, 503.11; VII,89—IX,106; 184 A2d 715 (Md Ct of App 1962), rev'd and rem 377 US 656 (1964); MCLL
  • Maryland Comm for Fair Congressional Redistricting v Tawes  (503.Md.1a), 503.Md.3; IX,106; MCLL
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Fishman v Secy of Commonwealth  503.Mass.1; VIII,110
MICHIGAN
  • Beadle v Scholle  503.Mich.1, 503.3; VI,69—IX,106; vac & rem 369 US 429 (1962); 116 NW2d 350 (Mich Sup Ct), cd 377 US 990 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Calkins v Hare  503.Mich.2, 503.3a; VII, 116—IX,106
  • Marshall v Hare  503.Mich.3; IX,59; 227 FSupp 989 (DC Mich 1964), rev'd 378 US 561 (1964)
  • Sailors v Bd of Educ (Kent Co)  503.Mich.4; XIII,145; 254 FSupp 17 (WD Mich), aff'd 387 US 105 (1967)
MINNESOTA
  • Hedlund v Hanson  503.Minn.1; VIII,41
  • Minnesota v Tahash  503.Minn.2; VIII,110; 115 NW2d 687 (Minn Sup Ct 1962)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Fortner v Barnett  503.Miss.1, 503.12; VII,116—VIII,84; MCLL
  • Connor v Johnson  503.Miss.2; XI,40—XIII, 145; 256 FSupp 962 (ND Miss), 265 FSupp 492 (ND Miss 1966), aff'd 386 US 483 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Marshall v Mayor, Bd of Selectmen of City of McComb, Mississippi  503.Miss.3; XI,99; 171 So2d 347 (Miss Sup Ct 1965), cd 382 US 836 (1965); MCLL
MISSOURI
  • Preisler v Hearnes  503.Mo.1; VIII,41; 362 SW2d 552 (Mo Sup Ct 1962)
  • Roddy v Dalton  503.Mo.2; IX,21
NEBRASKA
  • League of Nebraska Municipalities v Marsh  503.Neb.1; VIII,41; 209 FSupp 189 (DC Neb 1962)
NEVADA
  • Paley v Sawyer  503.Nev.1; VIII,41
NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • Levitt v Atty Genl  503.NH.1; VIII,41; 179 A2d 286, 180 A2d 827 (NH Sup Ct 1962)
  • Levitt v Maynard  503.NH.2; VIII,139; 182 A2d 897 (NH Sup Ct 1962)
NEW JERSEY
  • The Asbury Park Press v New Jersey Legislature  (503.NJ.1), 503.5; VI,94
  • Jackman v Bodine  503.NJ.2; VIII,41; 188 A2d 642 (NJ Super Ct 1963)
NEW MEXICO
  • Cargo v Mechem  503.NM.1; VIII,41
NEW YORK
  • WMCA v Lomenzo  503.NY.1, 503.6; VI,121—XI,40; 208 FSupp 368 (SD NY 1962), 370 US 190 (1962), 377 US 633 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Wright v Rockefeller  503.NY.2; VIII,41—IX,59; 211 FSupp 460 (SD NY 1962), dism'd 376 US 52 (1963)
  • Honeywood v Rockefeller  503.NY.3; VIII,41—IX,59; 371 US 1 (1962), 376 US 222 (1964); MCLL
NORTH DAKOTA
  • Lien v Sathre  503.ND.1; VIII,41—IX,106; 205 FSupp 536 (DC ND 1962)
OHIO
  • Nolan v Rhodes  503.Ohio.1; VIII,41—IX,106
  • Sive v Ellis  503.Ohio.2; VIII,41—IX,106; 218 FSupp 953 (SD Ohio 1963), rev'd and rem 378 US 556 (1964)
OKLAHOMA
  • Brown v State Election Bd  (503.Okla.1), 503.14; VII,116; 369 P2d 140 (Okla Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
  • Moss v Burkhart  503.Okla.2, 503.14a; VII,116—VIII,139; 207 FSupp 885, 220 FSupp 149 (WD Okla 1963)
  • Jones v Winters  503.Okla.3; VII,42
  • Reed v State Election Board  503.Okla.5; IX,59
  • Williams v Moss  503.Okla.6; IX,59,106; 378 US 558 (1964)
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Start v Lawrence  503.Pa.1; VIII,42
RHODE ISLAND
  • Sweeney v Notte  503.RI.1; VIII,42; 183 A2d 296 (RI Sup Ct 1962)
  • Needham v LaFrance  503.RI.2; VIII,110
TENNESSEE
  • Baker v Carr  503.Tenn.1, 503.1; VI,35—VIII,110; 206 FSupp 341 (MD Tenn 1962), 369 US 186 (1962)
TEXAS
  • Bush v Martin  503.Tex.1; IX,59; 224 FSupp 499 (SD Tex 1963), aff'd 376 US 222 (1964)
UTAH
  • Petuskey v Clyde  503.Utah.1; VIII,110
VERMONT
  • Mikell v Rousseau  503.Vt.1; VIII,42; 183 A2d 817 (Vt Sup Ct 1962)
  • Buckley v Hoff  503.Vt.2; VIII,110
VIRGINIA
  • Burnette v Davis  503.Va.1, 503.8; VII,89—XII,60; 213 FSupp 577 (ED Va 1962), 377 US 678 (1964); 238 FSupp 458 (ED Va), aff'd 379 US 694 (1965); 245 FSupp 241 (ED Va 1965), aff'd 382 US 42 (1965)
  • Donovan v Harrison  503.Va.2; VIII,110
  • Dusch v Davis  503.Va.3; XIII,146; 361 F2d 495 (CA 4), rev'd 387 US 112 (1967)
WASHINGTON
  • Thigpen v Meyers  503.Wash.1; VIII,42—IX,107; 211 FSupp 826 (WD Wash 1962), 378 US 554 (1964)
WEST VIRGINIA
  • Kanawha v Carson  503.WVa.1; VIII,110
WISCONSIN
  • State of Wisconsin v Zimmerman  503.Wis.1, 503.13; VII,116—VIII,42; 205 FSupp 673, 209 FSupp 183 (WD Wis 1962)
WYOMING
  • Whitehead v Gage  503.Wyo.1; VIII,42,110; 377 P2d 299 (Wyo Sup Ct 1963)
  • Schaefer v Thompson  503.Wyo.2; IX,21
504. 14th Amendment §2 Enforcement
  • Denman v McCormack  504.1; VIII,110—IX,59; MCLL
  • Lampkin v Connor  504.2; VIII,110—XIII,146; 239 FSupp 757 (DC DC), 360 F2d 505 (CA DC 1966); MCLL
505. Residence Requirements
  • Hallahan v Mittlebeeler  (505.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Carrington v Rash  505.1; X,53,154; 380 US 89 (1965)
  • Drueding v Devlin (Maryland)  505.2; X,53,154; 234 FSupp 721 (DC Md 1964); MCLL
  • van Berkel v NYC Bd of Elections  505.3; X,53—XII,60
  • Hall v Beals  505.4; XIV,138; I ACQ 52; 292 FSupp 610 (DC Col 1968), vac & rem 396 US 45 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Harris v Samuels  505.5; XIV,139; MCLL; ACLU
506. Miscellaneous Problems
  • Delaware v New York  506.1; XII,60—XIII,146; MCLL
  • Kramer v Union Free School Dist #15  506.2; XIII,146—XIV,139; I ACQ 24; 259 FSupp 164 (ED NY 1966), rev'd 379 F2d 491 (CA 2 1967), on rem 282 FSupp 70 (ED NY 1968), rev'd 395 US 621 (1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Galbreath v Davidson Co Democratic Primary Election Bd  506.3; XIII,146
  • McDonald v Bd of Elections (Chicago)  506.4; XIII,147
  • Allen v State Board of Electors (Virginia)  506.5; XIII,147; 268 FSupp 218 (ED Va), vac 393 US 544 (1969)
  • Sawyer v Healy  506.6; XIV,139; MCLL
  • Bryant v Blunt (Coahoma Co)  506.7; XIV,139; MCLL
  • Greenspun v Nevada  506.8; XIV,139
  • Schweitzer v Plymouth  506.9; XIV,139; 164 NW2d 35 (Mich Sup Ct 1969), cd 397 US 906 (1969)
  • Cirpriano v Houma  506.10; XIV,139; 286 FSupp 823 (ED La 1968), rev'd 395 US 701 (1969)
  • McDonald v Bd of Election Commrs (Chicago)  506.11; XIV,140; 265 FSupp 816 (ND Ill), 277 FSupp 14 (ND Ill 1967), aff'd 394 US 802 (1969)
  • Matthews v Little (Atlanta)  506.12; XIV,140; 306 FSupp 925 (ND Ga), 396 US 1223 (1969)
510. JURY SELECTION; APPEALS TO PREJUDICE (and 311)
511. Involving Federal Employees
512. Involving Racial, Nationality Discrimination
ALABAMA
  • Patterson v Alabama  (512.Ala.a); 294 US 600 (1935); MCLL
  • Norris v Alabama  (512.Ala.aa); 294 US 587 (1935)
  • Powell v Alabama  (512.Ala.aaa), 287 US 45 (1932)
  • Thompson v Alabama  (512.Ala.1), 512.23; IV, 107; 105 S2d 146 (Ala Ct of App 1958)
  • Anderson v Alabama  (512.Ala.2), 512.27; VI,35—VII,117; 120 S2d 397 (Ala Sup Ct 1960), rev'd per curiam 366 US 208 (1961)
  • Alabama v Seals  512.Ala.3, 512.29; VII,53—XI,40; 126 S2d 474 (Ala Sup Ct 1961), cd 366 US 954 (1961), US ex rel Seals v Wiman, 304 F2d 53 (CA 5 1962), cd 372 US 915 (1963); 165 So2d 742 (Ala Sup Ct 1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Howard v Alabama  (512.Ala.4), 512.48; IX,22; 151 So2d 790 (Ala Sup Ct 1963)
  • Alabama v Swain  512.Ala.5, 512.47; IX,107—XIV,102; 377 US 915 (1964); 156 So2d 368 (Ala Sup Ct 1965), aff'd 380 US 202 (1965); 2nd pet cd 382 US 944 (1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Coleman v Alabama  512.Ala.6, 512.53; IX,108—XI,40; MCLL
  • Billingsley v Clayton  512.Ala.7; X,120—XII,61; 359 F2d 13 (CA 5 1966), cd 385 US 841 (1966); MCLL
  • Blauvelt v Holman  512.Ala.8; XI,154; 237 FSupp 385 (MD Ala 1964)
  • White, US (Intervenor-Pl) v Crook  512.Ala.10; XI,40,100; 251 FSupp 401 (MD Ala 1966), MCLL
  • Mitchell and US (Pl-intervenor) v Johnson  512.Ala.11; XII,61—XIII,147; 250 FSupp 117 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Gurley v Alabama  512.Ala.12; XII,61; aff'd 179 So2d 159 (Ala Ct of App 1965)
  • McGinnis v Hale  512.Ala.13; XII,61—XIII,147
  • Jones v Wilson  512.Ala.14; XII,61—XIV,140
  • Bokulich v Alabama  512.Ala.15; XII,61—XIV,140; 298 FSupp 181 (ND Ala 1966), aff'd in pt 394 US 97 (1969); MCLL
  • Mitchell and US v Thomas  512.Ala.16; XII,61
  • Turner and US v Spencer; Black and US v Curb; McNeir and US v Agee  512.Ala.16a; XII,61; 261 FSupp 542 (SD Ala 1966); MCLL
  • Reese v Cobb; Jones v Holliman; Brandon v Coyle; Nixon v Parker  512.Ala.16b; XII,61—XIV,140
  • Taylor v Alabama  512.Ala.17; XIII,147—XIV,140; aff'd 185 So2d 412 (Ala Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
  • Alabama v Segrest  512.Ala.18; XIII,148
  • Davis v Jury Commission (Montgomery Co)  512.Ala.19; XIII,148; 261 FSupp 591 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Carter v Jury Commn (Greene Co)  512.Ala.20; XIV,141; 298 FSupp 181 (ND Ala 1969)
  • Jackson v Morrow  512.Ala.21; XIV,141; 404 F2d 903 (CA 5 1968)
  • Alabama v Billingsley  512.Ala.22, 512.Ala.9; X,154—XIV,141; 10 RRLR 376 (Cir Ct 1964)
  • Black v Coxwell  512.Ala.23; XIV,141; 1 RRLS 136 (SD Ala 1969)
  • Alabama v Gibbs  512.Ala.24; XIV,141
  • Johnson v Alabama  512.Ala.25; XIV,141; 288 FSupp 655 (MD Ala 1968)
  • Salary v Wilson  512.Ala.26; XIV,141; 415 F2d 467 (CA 5 1969)
ALASKA
  • Crawford v Alaska  512.Alas.1; XII,61; 408 P2d 1002 (Alas Sup Ct 1965)
ARKANSAS
  • Bailey v Arkansas  512.Ark.1, 512.7; III,39—X,120; 302 SW2d 796 (Ark Sup Ct 1957), cd w/o prej 361 US 945 (1960); 287 F2d 936 (CA 8 1961), 381 SW2d 467 (Ark Sup Ct 1964)
  • Stewart v Arkansas  512.Ark.2, 512.43; VIII,140—XI,40; 345 SW2d 472 (Ark Sup Ct Sup Ct 1961), cd 368 US 935 (1961); 206 FSupp 137 (1962), 311 F2d 691 (CA 8 1963); 375 SW2d 804 (Ark Sup Ct 1964), cd 379 US 935 (1964); 244 FSupp 982 (ED Ark 1965); MCLL
  • Lillard v Arkansas  512.Ark.3, 512.44; VIII,140—X,54; 365 SW2d 144 (Ark Sup Ct 1963)
  • Thomas v Arkansas  512.Ark.4; X,54,120; 9 RRLR 933 (Ark Sup Ct 1964)
  • Trotter, Harris v Arkansas  512.Ark.5; X,54; 377 SW2d 14 (Ark Sup Ct 1964)
  • Johnson v Arkansas  512.Ark.6; X,54; 377 SW2d 865 (Ark Sup Ct 1964)
  • Brown v Arkansas  512.Ark.7; XII,62; 395 SW2d 344 (Ark Sup Ct 1965)
  • Brooks v Haven  512.Ark.8; XIV,141
  • Kimble v Arkansas  512.Ark.9; XIV,141; 438 SW2d 705 (Ark Sup Ct 1969)
  • Adams v Thompson  512.Ark.10; XIV,142
  • Jewell v Stebbins  512.Ark.12; XIV,142; 288 FSupp 600 (ED Ark 1968)
CALIFORNIA
  • California v Melendez, Thompson, Padilla (Sleepy Lagoon Case)  (512.Calif.a); MCLL
  • California v Gregory, Bradley, Appelman  (512.Calif.b); MCLL
  • California v Sims  (512.Calif.c); MCLL
  • White v California  (512.Calif.1), 523.2; I,22,43; 278 P2d 9 (Calif Sup Ct 1954), cd 350 US 875 (1955); NLG
  • California v Rideaux  512.Calif.2; X,120,154; 39 CR 391 (Calif Sup Ct 1964)
  • Del Valle v DeVoto  512.Calif.3; XIV,142; MCLL
  • California v Craig  512.Calif.4; XIV,142; MCLL
  • California v Smith  512.Calif.5; XIV,142
  • California v Newton  512.Calif.6; XIV,143; MCLL
  • Newton v Oakland  512.Calif.6a; XIV,142; MCLL
  • California v Rios ("Los Siete")  512.Calif.7; XIV,142; MCLL
  • Goodlett v Municipal Ct, San Francisco  512.Calif.8; II ACQ 34; MCLL
COLORADO
  • Bary v US  (512.Colo.1), 512.10; III,59; 248 F2d 201 (CA 10 1957)
  • Colorado v Montoya  (512.Colo.2), 512.26; V,15; 345 P2d 1062 (Colo Sup Ct 1959); ACLU
  • Cruz v Colorado  (512.Colo.3), 512.35; VII,117; 368 P2d 774 (Colo Sup Ct 1962)
CONNECTICUT
  • Connecticut v David  (512.Conn.1), 512.31; VII,117—VIII,140; 197 A2d 935 (Conn Sup Ct 1963)
FLORIDA
  • US v Chance  512.Fla.1, 512.48; IX,107—X,120; 322 F2d 201 (CA 5 1963)
  • Florida v Porter  512.Fla.2, 512.49; IX,107—X,120; 160 So2d 104 (Fla Sup Ct 1963)
  • Mann v Wainright  512.Fla.3; XIII,148; 191 So2d 867 (Fla DCA 1966)
  • Craig v Wainwright  512.Fla.4; XIV,143
  • Drumwright, Gilley v Wainwright  512.Fla.5; XIV,143
GEORGIA
  • Williams v Georgia  (512.Ga.a); 82 SE2d 217 (Ga Sup Ct), rem 349 US 375 (1955)
  • Georgia v E Hall  (512.Ga.b); MCLL
  • Reece v Georgia  (512.Ga.1), 523.3; I,43; 85 SE2d 773 (Ga Sup Ct), rev'd 350 US 85 (1955)
  • Ingram v Georgia  (512.Ga.2), 512.17; IV,59; 103 SE2d 666 (Ga Ct of App 1958)
  • Davis v Balkcom  (512.Ga.3), 512.30; VII,117; 121 SE2d 505 (Ga Sup Ct 1961), cd 369 US 811 (1962); ACLU
  • Georgia v Glass  (512.Ga.4), 512.52; IX,108; 136 SE2d 197 (Ga Ct of App 1964)
  • Whitus v Georgia  512.Ga.5; X,54—XIII,148; 114 SE2d 877 (SD Ga), cd 365 US 831 (1961); 299 F2d 844 (CA 5), vac & rem 370 US 728 (1962); rev'd 333 F2d 496 (CA 5), cd 379 US 931 (1964); 149 SE2d 130, 138 (Ga Sup Ct), rev'd 385 US 545 (1967); aff'd 153 SE2d 446 (Ga Sup Ct)
  • Allen v Georgia  512.Ga.6; X,120,154; 137 SE2d 711 (Ga Ct of App 1964)
  • US ex rel Vanleeward v Rutledge  512.Ga.7; X,120—XIII,148; 137 SE2d 452 (Ga Sup Ct 1964), cd 380 US 982 (1965); 369 F2d 584 (CA 5 1966)
  • Georgia v Woods  512.Ga.8; X,120—XIII,148; 149 SE2d 675 (Ga Sup Ct 1966)
  • Georgia v A Brown  512.Ga.9; X,120
  • Bruner v Patterson  512.Ga.10; X,154
  • US ex rel O'Bryant v Hand  512.Ga.11; XI,40—XIII,148
  • Gamble v Grimes  512.Ga.12; XII,62—XIII,148; 11 RRLR 2028 (ND Ga 1966)
  • US v Mobley  512.Ga.13; XII,62—XIV,143; 11 RRLR 455 (MD Ga 1967), rev'd and rem 379 F2d 768 (CA 5 1967); MCLL
  • Broadway and US v Culpepper  512.Ga.14; XII,62—XIV,143
  • Pullum and US v Greene  512.Ga.15; XIII,149—XIV,143; rev'd & rem 396 F2d 251 (CA 5 1968)
  • Georgia v Willis  512.Ga.16; XIII,149
  • Georgia v Evans  512.Ga.17; XIII,149—XIV,143
  • Turner v Fouche  512.Ga.18; XIV,143; 290 FSupp 648 (SD Ga 1969)
  • Arkwright v Smith  512.Ga.19; XIV,144; 164 SE2d 796 (Ga Sup Ct 1968)
  • Whippler v Dutton  512.Ga.20; XIII,149—XIV, 144; 126 SE2d 744 (Ga Sup Ct 1962), cd 375 US 960 (1963); rev'd and rem 342 F2d 388 (CA 5 1965), 391 F2d 425, 141 (CA 5 1968)
  • Brawner v Smith  512.Ga.21; XIV,144; 167 SE2d 753 (Ga Sup Ct 1969), cd 396 US 927 (1969)
  • Salisbury v Grimes  512.Ga.22; XIV,144; 406 F2d 50 (CA 5 1969)
  • Moseley v Smith  512.Ga.23; XIV,144; 404 F2d 346 (CA 5 1968)
  • Massey v Smith  512.Ga.24; XIV,144; 164 SE2d 786, 790 (Ga Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
  • Simmons v US  512.Ga.25; XIV,144; aff'd 406 F2d 456 (CA 5 1969), cd 395 US 982 (1969)
ILLINOIS
  • In re Sherman H Skolnick v Spolar  (512.Ill.1), 555.Ill.1; XI,106
KANSAS
  • Kansas v Lopez  (512.Kan.1), 512.11; III,59; 318 P2d 662 (Kan Sup Ct 1957)
  • Kansas v Woods  (512.Kan.2), 512.47; IX,22; 381 P2d 533 (Kan Sup Ct 1963)
LOUISIANA
  • Michel v Louisiana  (512.La.1), 523.5; I,44; 350 US 91 (1955)
  • US ex rel Poret v Davis  512.La.2, 512.39, 523.4; I,44—VIII,43; 75 So2d 333 (La Sup Ct 1954), aff'd 350 US 91 (1955); rem 355 US 60 (1957); hab den 162 FSupp 574 (ED La 1958), aff'd 267 F2d 307 (CA 5 1959), rem 361 US 375 (1960); 229 FSupp 649 (ED La 1964), hab den 234 FSupp 171 (ED La 1964), 365 F2d 698 (CA 5 1966), cd 386 US 991 (1967); MCLL
  • Bennett v Labat  512.La.3; X,55—XIII,149; 75 So2d 333 (La Sup Ct 1954), aff'd 350 US 91 (1955), rem 355 US 60 (1957); hab den 162 FSupp 574 (ED La 1958), aff'd 267 F2d 307 (CA 5 1959), rem 361 US 375 (1960); 229 FSupp 649 (ED La 1964), 234 FSupp 171 (ED La 1964), cd 386 US 991 (1967); MCLL
  • Labat v McKeithen  512.La.3a; X,155—XIII, 149; 243 FSupp 662 (ED La 1965), 361 F2d 757 (CA 5 1966)
  • Louisiana v Neal  (512.La.4), 512.2; III,15; 93 S2d 554 (La Sup Ct 1957)
  • Louisiana v Edwards  (512.La.5), 512.3; III, 38; 94 S2d 674 (La Sup Ct 1957)
  • Louisiana v Palmer  (512.La.6), 512.4; III, 38; 94 S2d 439 (La Sup Ct 1957)
  • Eubanks v Louisiana  (512.La.7), 512.5; III, 39—V,15; 356 US 584 (1958)
  • Louisiana v Faciane and McMiller  (512.La.8), 512.15; IV,28; 99 S2d 333 (La Sup Ct 1957)
  • US ex rel Rogers v Davis  512.La.9, 512.41, 512.34; VII,117—X,55; 132 S2d 819 (La Sup Ct 1961), 323 F2d 653 (CA 5 1963)
  • Edward Davis v Gov Davis  512.La.10, 512.38; VIII,43—XII,62; 311 F2d 595 (CA 5 1963), 229 FSupp 649 (DC La 1964); rev'd and rem 361 F2d 770 (CA 5 1966)
  • Henderson v Louisiana  512.La.11, 512.42; VIII,111—XI,100; 170 So2d 374 (La Sup Ct 1965), cd 382 US 921 (1965); MCLL
  • Louisiana v Barksdale  512.La.12, 512.46; IX, 22—XII,62; 170 So2d 374 (La Sup Ct 1965), 10 RRLR 378 (1965), cd 382 US 921 (1965); MCLL
  • Louisiana v Goree  512.La.13, 512.50; IX,107—X,55; 139 So2d 531 (La Sup Ct 1962), 158 So2d 203 (La Sup Ct 1963)
  • Collins v Hanchey  512.La.14, 512.54; IX,108—X,155; 138 So2d 546 (La Sup Ct 1962), 329 F2d 100 (CA 5 1964), cd 379 US 901 (1964)
  • Millican v Caston (Louisiana)  512.La.15; X,55
  • US ex rel Mack v Walker  512.La.16; X,120—XIII,149; 6 RRLR 267 (La Jud Dist Ct 1961); 144 So2d 363 (La Sup Ct 1962), cd 373 US 917 (1963); 231 FSupp 819 (ED La 1964), aff'd 372 F2d 170 (CA 5 1966), cd 393 US 1030 (1969)
  • Scott v Walker  512.La.17; XI,41,100; 8 RRLR 1179 (ED La 1963), 358 F2d 561 (CA 5 1966); MCLL
  • Hall v Hoyt  512.La.18; XII,62—XIII,149
  • Clark v Allgood  512.La.21; XIII,149; 258 FSupp 773 (ED La 1966)
  • Louisiana v Rideau  512.La.22; XIII,149; 193 So2d 264 (La Sup Ct 1966)
  • Love v Gant  512.La.23; XIV,144
  • Goins v Allgood  512.La.24; XIV,144; 391 F2d 692 (CA 5 1968)
MICHIGAN
  • Michigan v Simpson  512.Mich.1; XIII,149; rev'd & rem 146 NW2d 828 (Mich Ct of App 1966)
  • Michigan v Mason; Michigan v Rodgers  512. Mich.2; II ACQ 34
MISSISSIPPI
  • Johnson v Mississippi  (512.Miss.1), 523.1; I,22; 76 S2d 841 (Miss Sup Ct 1955), cd 349 US 946 (1955)
  • US ex rel Goldsby v Harpole  (512.Miss.2), 512.9, 512.12; III,59—V,38; 263 F2d 71 (CA 5 1959), cd 361 US 838 (1959); 123 S2d 492, 124 S2d 297 (Miss Sup Ct 1960)
  • Reed v Mississippi  (512.Miss.3), 512.13; IV, 28; 99 S2d 455 (Miss Sup Ct 1958)
  • Cameron v Mississippi  (512.Miss.4), 512.19; IV,59; 102 S2d 355 (Miss Sup Ct 1958)
  • Gordon v Breazeale  512.Miss.5, 512.40; VIII, 111—XI,100; 149 So2d 475 (Miss Sup Ct 1962), cd 374 US 852 (1963); 160 So2d 73 (Miss Sup Ct 1964), 246 FSupp 2 (ND Miss 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Harper v Mississippi  512.Miss.6; X,120—XI,41; 171 So2d 129 (Miss Sup Ct 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Bailey v Warton  512.Miss.7; X,121; MCLL; ACLU
  • Bass v Mississippi  512.Miss.8; X,155; MCLL; ACLU
  • Smith v Mississippi  512.Miss.9; X,155—XI,41; 169 So2d 451 (Miss Sup Ct 1964); ACLU
  • US (Intervenor-Pl) v Officials of Sharkey County  512.Miss.10; XI,100—XIII,150
  • Woodruff v Breazeale  512.Miss.11; XII,62—XIV,144; 291 FSupp 130 (ND Miss), aff'd 401 F2d 997 (CA 5 1968); MCLL; ACLU
  • Hopkins v Mississippi  512.Miss.12; XII,62; 182 S2d 236 (Miss Sup Ct 1966)
  • Shinall v Breazeale  512.Miss.13; XIII,150; rev'd and rem 187 So2d 840 (Miss Sup Ct 1966), aff'd 199 So2d 251 (Miss Sup Ct 1967), cd 389 US 1014 (1967); 206 So2d 332 (Miss Sup Ct 1968), rem 404 F2d 785 (CA 5 1968)
  • Ellzey v Breazeale  512.Miss.14; XIII,150—XIV,144; 277 FSupp 948 (SD Miss 1967)
  • Williams v Mississippi  512.Miss.15; XIV,144; rev'd and rem 220 So2d 325 (Miss Sup Ct 1969)
  • King v Pettit  512.Miss.16; XIV,145
  • King v Cook  512.Miss.17; XIV,145; 287 FSupp 269 (ND Miss 1968), 297 FSupp 99 (ND Miss 1969), 298 FSupp 584 (ND Miss 1969)
  • Raiford v Dillon  512.Miss.18; XIV,145; 297 FSupp 1307 (SD Miss 1969)
  • Love v McGee  512.Miss.19; XIV,145; 297 FSupp 1314 (SD Miss 1968)
  • Johnson v Gibbs  512.Miss.20; XIV,145
  • Ford v White  512.Miss.21; XIV,145; 299 FSupp 772 (SD Miss 1969)
MISSOURI
  • Brewer v Poteet  (512.Mo.1), 512.2; III,38
  • Wilson and Wilson v A & P Co  (512.Mo.2), 512.14; IV,28; 156 FSupp 767 (WD Mo 1957)
MONTANA
  • Montana v Crockett  512.Mont.1; XIII,150; 421 P2d 722 (Mont Sup Ct 1966)
NEVADA
  • Stamps v US  512.Nev.1; XIV,145; 406 F2d 925 (CA 9 1969)
NEW JERSEY
  • New Jersey v Levitt  (512.NJ.1), 512.36; VII, 117; 176 A2d 465 (NJ Sup Ct 1961)
  • New Jersey v Roberts  512.NJ.2; XI,100—XII, 62; 220 A2d 416 (Sup Ct NJ 1966); MCLL
  • Boggs v Cafiero  512.NJ.3; XIV,145
  • Smith v New Jersey  512.NJ.4; XIV,145; 246 A2d 35 (NJ Sup Ct 1968)
NEW MEXICO
  • Torres v US  512.NM.1; X,121,155; 333 F2d 99 (CA 10 1964)
NEW YORK
  • New York v Hearns  (512.NY.a), 512.40; VIII, 84; 8 RRLR 244 (NY Sup Ct, App Div 1963)
  • Reyes v Arthur Tickle Eng Works  (512.NY.1), 512.1; II,79—III,38; 144 NE2d 723 (NY Ct of App 1957)
  • New York v Santos  (512.NY.2), 512.24; V,15
  • Rundquist v Judge Leibowitz  (512.NY.3), 512.25; V,15,62; ACLU
  • New York v Agron  (512.NY.4), 512.28; VII, 20,117; 176 NE2d 556 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • Epton v Hogan  512.NY.5; X,155
  • Chestnut v New York  512.NY.6; XII,62—XIII, 150; 370 F2d 1 (CA 2 1966), cd 386 US 1009 (1967)
  • New York v Horton  512.NY.7; XIII,150; 275 NYS2d 377 (NY Ct of App 1966)
  • New York v Naphtali  512.NY.8; XIII,150
NORTH CAROLINA
  • North Carolina v Perry  (512.NC.1), 512.18; IV,59; 103 SE2d 404 (NC Sup Ct 1958)
  • North Carolina v Covington  (512.NC.2), 512.33; VII,117—VIII,111; 128 SE2d 822, 827 (NC Sup Ct 1963); MCLL
  • North Carolina v Arnold  (512.NC.3), 512.45; VIII,140—IX,107; 29 SE2d 229 (NC Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 376 US 773 (1964)
  • North Carolina v Inman  512.NC.4, 512.51; IX, 108—X,56; 132 SE2d 613 (NC Sup Ct 1963)
  • North Carolina v Wilson  512.NC.5; X,121,155; 137 SE2d 109 (NC Sup Ct 1964)
  • McNeil v No Carolina  512.NC.6; XIII,150; 248 FSupp 867 (ED NC 1964), rev'd and rem 368 F2d 313 (CA 4 1966)
  • Dixon v Turner  512.NC.7; XIII,150; rev'd 376 US 773 (1964); 129 SE2d 229 (NC Sup Ct 1964), 257 FSupp 985 (ED NC 1964)
  • North Carolina v Belk, Pearson, Berry  512.NC.8; XIII,150; 150 SE2d 481 (NC Sup Ct 1966)
  • North Carolina v Wright  512.NC.9; XIV,145; 163 SE2d 897 (NC Sup Ct 1968)
OHIO
  • Ohio v Ahmed Evans  512.Ohio.1; XIV,145
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Pennsylvania v Banmiller  (512.Pa.1), 512.16; IV,28; 137 A2d 236 (Pa Sup Ct 1958)
  • US ex rel McCode v Myers  512.Pa.2; X,121; 232 FSupp 371 (ED Pa 1964)
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Bostick v South Carolina  512.SC.1; XII,63—XIII,150; 131 SE2d 841 (SC Sup Ct 1964), 145 SE2d 439 (SC Sup Ct 1965), rev'd 386 US 479 (1967)
TENNESSEE
  • Anderson v Johnson  512.Tenn.1; XIII,151—XIV,145; aff'd 371 F2d 84 (CA 6 1966), aff'd 390 US 456, 1037 (1968)
  • Bonds v Tennessee  512.Tenn.2; XIV,146
  • Tennessee ex rel Hathaway v Henderson  512.Tenn.3; XIV,146; 432 SW2d 503 (Tenn Ct of Cr App 1968)
TEXAS
  • Hernandez v Texas  (512.Tex.a); 251 SW2d 531 (Tex Ct of Crim App), rev'd 347 US 475 (1954)
  • Cassell v Texas  (512.Tex.b); 339 US 282 (1950); MCLL
  • In re Lamkin  (512.Tex.1), 512.6; III,39; 355 US 59 (1957)
  • Barry v Texas  (512.Tex.2), 512.8; III,59; 305 SW2d 580 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1957)
  • Scott v Texas  (512.Tex.3), 512.37; VII,117; 352 SW2d 726 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1962)
  • Brooks v Beto  512.Tex.4; XIII,151; 342 SW2d 439, reh'g 442 (Tex Crim App 1961); 241 FSupp 743 (SD Tex 1965), 366 F2d 1 (CA 5 1966), cd 386 US 975 (1967); MCLL
  • Rodriguez v Brown  512.Tex.5; XIV,146; 299 FSupp 479 (WD Tex 1969), 300 FSupp 737 (WD Tex 1969)
  • Joyner v Texas  512.Tex.6; XIV,146; 436 SW2d 141 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1969)
VIRGINIA
  • Goldman v Virginia  512.Va.1; XI,100—XII,63; cd 383 US 969 (1966)
  • Townes v Peyton  512.Va.2; XIV,146; 404 F2d 456 (CA 4 1968), cd 395 US 924 (1969)
  • Witcher v Peyton  512.Va.3; XIV,146; rev'd 382 F2d 707 (CA 4 1966), 12 RRLR 1567 (CA 4 1967), 405 F2d 725 (CA 4 1969)
WASHINGTON
  • Washington v Hicks  512.Wash.1; XIV,146; 448 P2d 930 (Wash Sup Ct 1968)
WEST VIRGINIA
  • Scroda v Tutwiler, Sheriff  (512.WVa.1), 512.20; IV,60,81
  • Venable v West Virginia  (512.WVa.2), 512.21; IV,81—V,15
  • Crawford v Tutwiler, Sheriff  (512.WVa.3), 512.22; IV,82
  • Lark v US  512.WVa.4; XIII,151; aff'd 358 F2d 310 (CA 4 1966), cd 385 US 875 (1966)
WISCONSIN
  • Wisconsin v Bond  512.Wisc.1; XIV,146; 163 NW2d 601 (Wisc Sup Ct 1969)
513. Involving Economic Discrimination
  • Illinois ex rel Flanagan v McDonough  (513.a); MCLL; ACLU
  • Dow v Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp  (513.1), 522.1; I,22,79; 224 F2d 414 (CA 3 1955), cd 350 US 971 (1956)
  • Wynn v Byrne  513.2; XIV,146; vac & rem 390 US 197 (1968)
514. Involving Political Discrimination
515. Involving Discrimination Against Women (and 578)
  • Hoyt v Florida  515.1; VII,20—VIII,43; 368 US 57 (1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Willis v Carson  515.2; XII,63—XIII,151; MCLL
  • Dailey v Perry  515.3; XIV,146
516. Involving Other Discrimination
  • Lewinson v Crews  516.1; XI,41—XIV,146; 282 NYS2d 83 (Sup Ct App Div NY 1968); MCLL
520. EDUCATION (and 24, 571)
521. Challenges to Unequal Facilities
  • Sweatt v Painter  (521.a); 339 US 629 (1950); MCLL; ACLU
  • Holland v Bd of Pub Inst (Palm Peach)  521.1; II,22—VIII,140; 6 RRLR 691 (SD Fla 1961), 7 RRLR 341 (SD Fla 1962)
  • Johnson v Marion Co Bd of Educ  521.2; VI,35—VIII,44
  • Georgia v 90 Negro Demonstrators  521.3; XII, 63
  • Chicago Bd of Educ v Illinois  521.4; XIV,147
  • Detroit Bd of Educ v Michigan  521.5; XIV,147
522. Suits To Enforce Integration (and 571)
ALABAMA
  • Lucy v Adams (U of Ala)  522.Ala.1; II,22—X,56; 350 US 1 (1955); 328 F2d 892 (CA 5 1964)
  • US v Wallace (U of Ala)  522.Ala.1a; IX,22; 218 FSupp 290 (ND Ala 1963), 222 FSupp 485 (MD Ala 1963)
  • Whetstone v Rogers (U of Ala)  522.Ala.1b; XI, 41; 10 RRLR 1509 (ND Ala 1965)
  • Shuttlesworth v Birmingham Bd of Educ  522. Ala.2; III,59—IV,82; 162 FSupp 372 (ND Ala 1958), aff'd 358 US 101 (1958)
  • Armstrong v Birmingham Bd of Educ  522.Ala.2a; VII,118—XII,63; 323 F2d 333 (CA 5 1963), cd 376 US 908 (1964); 333 F2d 47 (CA 5 1964), 9 RRLR 1163 (ND Ala 1964)
  • Nelson v Birmingham Bd of Educ  522.Ala.2b; VII,118—X,56; 7 RRLR 659 (CA 5 1962), 220 FSupp 217 (ND Ala 1963), 323 F2d 333 (CA 5 1963), 333 F2d 47 (CA 5 1963)
  • Koen v Knight (Ala Voc Schools)  522.Ala.3; VI,94—X,121
  • Reed v Pearson (Reeds' Chapel)  522.Ala.4; VI, 94—VIII,44; 306 F2d 690 (CA 5 1962)
  • Lee and US v Macon Co Bd of Educ, State Bd of Educ  522.Ala.5; VIII,85—XIII,152; 221 FSupp 297 (1963), 231 FSupp 743 (MD Ala 1964), 10 RRLR 588 (MD Ala 1965), 10 RRLR 1512 (MD Ala 1965), 289 FSupp 975 (MD Ala 1968), rev'd 292 FSupp 363 (MD Ala 1968); MCLL
  • US v Rea, Mayor (Notsaluga, Macon Co)  522.Ala.5a; IX,109; 231 FSupp 772 (MD Ala 1964)
  • Opinion of the Justices  522.Ala.5b; IX,109; 160 So2d 648 (Ala Sup Ct 1964)
  • Hereford v Huntsville  522.Ala.6; VIII,85—XI,41; 9 RRLR 1183 (ND Ala 1964)
  • Lorder v Huntsville Bd of Educ  522.Ala.6a; IX,60—X,57; 9 RRLR 1183 (ND Ala 1964)
  • US v Mobile Co Bd of School Commrs  522.Ala.7; VIII,85—X,121
  • Davis v Mobile Co Bd of School Commrs  522.Ala.7a; VIII,111—X,155; 318 F2d 63, 322 F2d 356 (CA 5 1963), cd 375 US 894 (1964); 333 F2d 53 (CA 5 1964), 9 RRLR 1177 (SD Ala 1964), cd 379 US 844 (1964); 10 RRLR 1016 (SD Ala 1965), rev'd & rem 364 F2d 896 (CA 5 1966), 394 F2d 690 (CA 5), 414 F2d 609 (CA 5 1969), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969)
  • US v Madison Co  522.Ala.8; VIII,140—X,155; 219 FSupp 60 (ND Ala 1963), 326 F2d 237 (CA 5 1964), cd 379 US 929 (1964)
  • Bennett v Madison Co Bd of Educ  522.Ala.8a; IX,60—X,155; 9 RRLR 1166 (ND Ala 1964)
  • Franklin v Parker (Auburn U)  522.Ala.9; IX,22—XI,41; 223 FSupp 724 (ED Ala 1963), 331 F2d 841 (CA 5 1964)
  • Gunn v Norton (Florence State College)  522.Ala.10; IX,23,109; 8 RRLR 1395 (ND Ala 1963)
  • Miller v Bd of Educ, Gadsden  522.Ala.11; IX,61—XII,64; 8 RRLR 1403 (ND Ala 1963), 9 RRLR 1191 (ND Ala 1964)
  • Harris v Bullock Co School Bd  522.Ala.12; X,58—XIII,153; 232 FSupp 959 (MD Ala 1965), 253 FSupp 276 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Carr v Montgomery Co School Bd; US v Bd of Educ  522.Ala.13; X,58—XIV,147; 10 RRLR 582 (MD Ala 1965), 232 FSupp 705 (MD Ala 1965), 253 FSupp 306 (MD Ala), 289 FSupp 647 (MD Ala), mod 400 F2d 1 (CA 5), rev'd 395 US 225 (1969); MCLL
  • US v Bd of Educ (Bessemer)  522.Ala.14; X,155—XIII,153; vac & rem 349 F2d 1021 (CA 5 1965), 10 RRLR 1011 (ND Ala 1965); rev'd & rem 372 F2d 836 (CA 5 1966), 380 F2d 385 (CA 5 1967), rev'd 396 F2d 44 (CA 5 1968), 417 F2d 846 (CA 5 1969)
  • Boykins v Bd of Educ (Fairfield)  522.Ala.15; XI,41—XIII,153; 10 RRLR 1007 (ND Ala 1965), rem 399 F2d 11 (CA 5 1968)
  • Stout and US v Bd of Educ (Jefferson Co)  522.Ala.16; XI,42—XIII,153; 10 RRLR 1024 (ND Ala 1965), vac 349 F2d 1021 (CA 5 1965), rev'd 372 F2d 836 (CA 5), 12 RRLR 749 (CA 5 1967), 380 F2d 385 (CA 5 1967), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5), 386 US 1001 (1967); MCLL
  • Re Barbour Co  522.Ala.17; XI,42
  • Franklin v Barbour Co Bd of Educ  522.Ala.17a; XIII,153
  • Brown v Bd of Educ (Demopolis)  522.Ala.18; XI,42—XII,64
  • US v Bd of Educ (Greene Co)  522.Ala.19; XII,64
  • US v Bd of Educ (Lowndes Co)  522.Ala.20; XII, 64; 11 RRLR 692 (MD Ala 1966)
  • US v Huntsville, Gadsden, Madison Co Bds of Educ  522.Ala.21; XII,64—XIII,153
  • US v State Bd of Educ  522.Ala.22; XII,64—XIII,154
  • US v Bd of Educ (Choctaw Co)  522.Ala.23; XII,64—XIII,154; 259 FSupp 408 (SD Ala 1966)
  • Reynolds v Bd of Educ (Anniston)  522.Ala.24; XII,64
  • Harris v Bd of Educ (Crenshaw Co)  522.Ala.25; XIII,154
  • Alabama State Teachers Assn v Alabama Public School and College Authority  522.Ala.26; XIV,147; 289 FSupp 784 (MD Ala), aff'd 393 US 400 (1969)
ARKANSAS
  • Banks v Izzard, Bd of Educ (Fort Smith)  (522.Ark.a), 610.20; I,47,102; 2 RRLR 965 (WD Ark 1956)
  • Smith v Faubus (Little Rock)  (522.Ark.b), 522.Ark.3a; III,15; 327 SW2d 562 (Ark Sup Ct 1959)
  • Hoxie School District #46 v Brewer  522.Ark.1; II,22—III,15; 135 FSupp 296 (ED Ark 1955), 137 FSupp 364 (ED Ark 1956), aff'd 238 F2d 91 (CA 8 1956)
  • Matthews v Launius (Bearden Dist)  522.Ark.2; II,22—Vi,35; 134 FSupp 684 (WD Ark 1955)
  • Norwood (Aaron) v Tucker (Cooper, McKinley) (Little Rock)  522.Ark.3; II,23—VII,21; 143 FSupp 855 (ED Ark 1956), aff'd 243 F2d 361 (CA 8 1956), cd 357 US 566 (1956); 156 FSupp 220 (1957), aff'd 254 F2d 797 (CA 8 1957), cd 358 US 829 (1957); 163 FSupp 13 (ED Ark 1957), aff'd 358 US 1 (1957); rev'd 257 F2d 33 (CA 8 1957); 169 FSupp 325 (ED Ark 1958), 261 F2d 97 (CA 8 1958); 186 FSupp 913 (ED Ark 1960)
  • Clark v Matson (Little Rock)  522.Ark.3a; X,155—XIII,154; 369 F2d 661 (CA 8 1966)
  • Garrett v Faubus (Little Rock)  522.Ark.3c; IV,29,82; aff'd 323 SW2d 877 (Ark Sup Ct 1959)
  • Fitzhugh v Ford (Little Rock)  522.Ark.3d; IV,29—V,16; 4 RRLR 550 (Pulaski Co Cir Ct 1959), aff'd 323 SW2d 559 (Ark Sup Ct 1959)
  • Aaron v McKinley (Little Rock)  522.Ark.3e; V,38; 173 FSupp 944 (ED Ark 1959), aff'd 361 US 197 (1959)
  • Safferstone v Tucker (Little Rock)  522.Ark.3f; VII,118; 357 SW2d 3 (Ark Sup Ct 1962)
  • Pl v Bd of Educ (Van Buren)  522.Ark.4; IV,29
  • Dove v Parham (Dollarway)  522.Ark.5; IV,82—IX,23; 176 FSupp 242 (ED Ark 1959), 271 F2d 132 (CA 8 1959), 183 FSupp 389 (1960), 282 F2d 256 (CA 8 1960); 196 FSupp 944 (ED Ark 1961)
  • Whitfield v Raney (U of Arkansas)  522.Ark.6; X,58—XI,42; 10 RRLR 574 (ED Ark 1965)
  • Rogers v Paul (Fort Smith)  522.Ark.7; X,58—XII,64; 232 FSupp 833 (WD Ark), 345 F2d 117 (CA 8 1965), rem 382 US 198 (1965)
  • Yarbrough v Hulbert-West Memphis School Dist #4 of Crittenden Co  522.Ark.8; X,156—XIII,154; 243 FSupp 65 (ED Ark 1965), vac & rem 380 F2d 962 (CA 8 1967)
  • Kemp v Beasley (Eldorado)  522.Ark.9; X,156—XII,64; 10 RRLR 591 (WD Ark 1965), 352 F2d 14 (CA 8 1965)
  • Mary Brown v Bd of Educ (Dewitt)  522.Ark.10; XII,64—XIII,154; 263 FSupp 734 (ED Ark 1966)
  • Raney v Bd of Educ (Gould)  522.Ark.11; XII,64—XIV,147; 381 F2d 252 (CA 5), 391 US 443 (1968)
  • US (Intervenor) v Bds of Educ (Childress, Howard Co Training School, Nashville & Mineral Springs Dists)  522.Ark.12; XII,64—XIII,154
  • Kelley v Public School Dist #22 & Stowers Const Co (Altheimer)  522.Ark.13; XII,65—XIII,154; 297 FSupp 753 (ED Ark 1966), rev'd & rem 378 F2d 483 (CA 8 1967)
  • Spriggs v Altheimer School Dist  522.Ark.13a; XII,65; 401 F2d 137 (CA 8 1966)
  • McGhee and US v Nashville Special School Dist #1 (Nashville, Childress)  522.Ark.14; XII,65; 401 F2d 137 (CA 8 1966)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Crawfordsville)  522.Ark.15; XII,65—XIII,154
  • Marks v Edinburg School Dist  522.Ark.16; XII,65
  • Jackson v Marvell School Dist #22  522.Ark.17; XII,65
CALIFORNIA
  • Romero v Weakley (Imperial Co)  (522.Calif.a), 610.6; I,26,46; 131 FSupp 818 (SD Calif 1955), 226 F2d 399 (CA 9 1955)
  • Burleigh v Weakley (Imperial Co)  (522.Calif.b), 610.7; I,26,101; 226 F2d 399 (CA 9 1955)
  • Jackson v Pasadena City School Dist  522.Calif.1; VII,90—IX,61; rev'd & rem 382 P2d 878 (Calif Sup Ct 1963); MCLL
  • McMurtry v Bd of Educ (San Francisco)  522.Calif.2; VIII,44; MCLL
  • Brock v Bd of Educ (San Francisco)  522.Calif.3; VIII,44; MCLL
  • LaRoche v Bd of Educ (San Francisco)  522.Calif.3a; VIII,44,85; MCLL
  • Keller v Bd of Educ (Sacramento City Unif School Dist)  522.Calif.4; IX,23—X,156; MCLL
  • Crawford v Bd of Educ (Los Angeles)  522.Calif.5; IX,23—XIV,147
  • Spangler and US v Bd of Educ (Pasadena)  522.Calif.6; XIV,148; I ACQ 24; 415 F2d 1242 (CA 9 1969); MCLL
  • Carlin v Bd of Educ (San Diego)  522.Calif.7; XIV,148; MCLL
  • Melvin v Bd of Educ (Richmond)  522.Calif.8; XIV,148
COLORADO
  • Keyes v School Dist No 1 (Denver)  522.Colo.1; XIV,148; 303 FSupp 289 (DC Colo), vac 396 US 1215 (1969)
DELAWARE
  • Gebhart v Belton  (522.Dela.a); 345 US 972 (1953), 347 US 483 (1954), aff'd 349 US 294 (1955); MCLL; ACLU
  • Steiner v Simmons  (522.Dela.b), 610.11; I,27; rev'd & rem 111 A2d 574 (Dela Sup Ct 1955); ACLU
  • Jackson v Buchanan, Members of Dela Bd of Educ and Bd of Trustees (Christiana)  522.Dela.1; II,23—IV,108
  • Evans v Buchanan (Milford)  522.Dela.2; II,23—VIII,45; 152 FSupp 886 (DC Dela), 256 F2d 688 (CA 3 1958), cd 358 US 836 (1958); 281 F2d 385 (CA 3 1960), cd 364 US 933 (1961); 207 FSupp 820 (DC Dela 1962)
  • Holloman v Buchanan (Milton)  522.Dela.3; II,23—IV,108
  • Coverdale v Buchanan (Greenwood)  522.Dela.4; II,23—IV,108
  • Creighton v Buchanan (Laurel)  522.Dela.5; II, 23—IV,108
  • Denson v Buchanan (Seaford)  522.Dela.6; II,23—IV,108
  • Oliver, Jr v Buchanan (Clayton)  522.Dela.7; II,23—IV,108
  • Staten v Buchanan (Milford)  522.Dela.8; II, 23—V,16; 152 FSupp 886 (DC Del 1957), 256 F2d 688 (CA 3 1958), cd 358 US 836 (1958)
  • Dennis v Baker (Dover)  522.Dela.9; III,16—V,62
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Bolling v Sharpe  (522.DC.a); 345 US 972 (1953), 347 US 497 (1954), rev'd 349 US 294 (1955)
  • Hansen v Hobson; Smuck v Hobson (Washington)  522.DC.1; XII,65—XIV,148; 252 FSupp 4 (DC DC), 256 FSupp 18 (DC DC), 265 FSupp 902 (DC DC), 269 FSupp 401 (DC DC 1967), dism'd 393 US 801 (1968); 408 F2d 175 (CA DC 1969); MCLL
  • Green v Kennedy  522.DC.2; XIV,148
FLORIDA
  • Hawkins v Bd of Control (Fla U Law School)  522.Fla.1; II,23—III,84; 350 US 413 (1956), 93 So2d 354 (Fla Sup Ct), cd 355 US 839 (1957)
  • Hawkins v Bd of Control (Fla U Law School)  522.Fla.la; III,60,84; rev'd & rem 253 F2d 752 (CA 5 1958); 162 FSupp 851 (ND Fla 1958)
  • Gibson v Bd of Pub Inst (Dade Co)  522.Fla.2; II,23—X,156; rev'd & rem 272 F2d 763 (CA 5 1959); ACLU
  • Manning v Bd of Pub Inst (Hillsborough Co)  522.Fla.3; V,16—XI,42; rev'd & rem 277 F2d 370 (CA 5 1960), 8 RRLR 496 (SD Fla 1963)
  • Re Lake Co School Bond Issue  522.Fla.4; V,16,39
  • Augustus v Escambia Co Bd of Pub Inst (Pensacola)  522.Fla.5; V,39—XII,65; 185 FSupp 450 (ND Fla 1960), 6 RRLR 73, 689 (ND Fla 1961), rev'd 306 F2d 862 (CA 5 1962), 11 RRLR 148 (ND Fla 1965)
  • Tillman v Bd of Pub Inst (Volusia Co)  522.Fla.6; V,93—XII,65; 7 RRLR 687 (SD Fla 1962), 8 RRLR 499 (SD Fla 1963), 10 RRLR 609 (MD Fla 1964)
  • Braxton v Bd of Pub Inst (Duval Co)  522.Fla.7; VI,70—XI,42; 299 F2d 846 (CA 5 1962), 326 F2d 616 (CA 5 1964), cd 377 US 924 (1964); 10 RRLR 1043 (MD Fla 1965), 303 FSupp 958 (MD Fla 1969); MCLL
  • Bornas v Bd of Public Inst, Broward Co (Ft Lauderdale)  522.Fla.8; VII,21,118
  • Weaver v Bd of Pub Inst (Brevard Co)  522.Fla.9; VII,21—X,156; 9 RRLR 1202 (MD Fla 1964); MCLL
  • Mays v Bd of Pub Inst (Sarasota Co)  522.Fla.10; VII,21—X,59; 8 RRLR 930 (SD Fla 1963); MCLL
  • Ellis v Kipp, Bd of Pub Inst (Orange Co)  522.Fla.11; VII,90—XI,42; 10 RRLR 121 (MD Fla 1964)
  • Steele v Bd of Pub Inst (Leon Co)  522.Fla.12; VII,90—XIII,155; 10 RRLR 605 (SD Fla 1965), 12 RRLR 804 (ND Fla 1967), vac & rem 371 F2d 395 (CA 5 1967); MCLL
  • Mills v Bd of Pub Inst (Polk Co)  522.Fla.13; VIII,45—XI,42; 10 RRLR 124 (SD Fla 1965)
  • Scott v Bd of Inst (St Johns Co)  522.Fla.14; VIII,45—XI,42
  • Hall v Bd of Educ (Broward Co)  522.Fla.15; VIII,85—IX,23
  • Milledge v Florida State Bd of Control  522.Fla.16; VIII,141—IX,110; 8 RRLR 1402 (Leon Co Cir Ct 1963)
  • Hammond v U of Tampa  522.Fla.17; VIII,141—XI,42; 9 RRLR 600 (MD Fla 1964), 344 F2d 951 (CA 5 1965)
  • Youngblood and US v Bd of Educ (Bay Co)  522.Fla.18; IX,110—XIII,155; 9 RRLR 1206 (ND Fla 1964), 230 FSupp 74 (ND Fla 1964), 12 RRLR 804 (ND Fla 1967)
  • Major v Monroe Co Bd of Pub Inst  522.Fla.19; X,59—XI,42; 10 RRLR 1523 (SD Fla 1965)
  • Bradley v Bd of Pub Inst (Pinellas Co)  522. Fla.20; X,60—XII,65; 10 RRLR 117 (MD Fla 1965)
  • Singleton v Bd of Comm'rs of State Institutions (Fla Juvenile Reform Schools)  522.Fla.21; X,60
  • Wright v Bd of Pub Inst (Alachua Co)  522.Fla.22; X,60—XI,43; 10 RRLR 611 (ND Fla 1965), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969)
  • Harvest v Bd of Pub Inst (Manatee Co)  522.Fla.23; X,121—XII,65; 10 RRLR 1522 (MD Fla 1965), 421 F2d 136 (CA 5 1969)
  • Zimmerman v Bd of Pub Inst (Columbia Co)  522.Fla.24; X,121—XII,65; 11 RRLR 155 (MD Fla 1966)
  • Blalock v Bd of Pub Inst (Lee Co)  522.Fla.25; X,121; 11 RRLR 150 (MD Fla 1965)
  • Sharpton v Bd of Pub Inst (Indian River Co)  522.Fla.26; X,156—XI, 43; 10 RRLR 605 (SD Fla 1965)
  • Lawson v Bd of Educ (Suwannee Co)  522.Fla.27; XI,43
GEORGIA
  • Aaron v Cook (Atlanta)  (522.Ga.a), 610.18; I,47,102
  • Ward v Regents, Univ System of Georgia  522.Ga.1; II,23,61; 191 FSupp 491 (ND Ga 1957)
  • Hunt v Arnold (Atlanta)  522.Ga.2; II,45—V,16; 172 FSupp 847 (ND Ga 1959)
  • Calhoun v Latimer (Atlanta)  522.Ga.3; III,40—XI,43; 188 FSupp 412 (ND Ga 1960), 6 RRLR 976 (ND Ga 1961), 321 F2d 302 (CA 5 1963), vac and rem 377 US 263 (1964); 10 RRLR 621 (ND Ga 1965)
  • Pls v Letson (Atlanta)  522.Ga.3a; VII,90
  • Griggs v Cook (Atlanta)  522.Ga.3b; XIII,155;272 FSupp 163 (ND Ga 1967), aff'd 384 F2d 705 (CA 5 1967)
  • Holmes v Danner (U of Ga)  522.Ga.4; V,93—VI,94; 191 FSupp 385, 394 (MD Ga 1961)
  • Wittkamper v Harvey (Americus)  522.Ga.5; VI,37; 188 FSupp 715 (MD Ga 1960)
  • Roberts v Stell (Savannah-Chatham)  522.Ga.6; VII,54—XII,65; 318 F2d 425 (CA 5 1963), 333 F2d 47 (CA 5 1964), 220 FSupp 667 (SD Ga 1963), rev'd 333 F2d 55 (CA 5 1964), cd 379 US 933 (1964); 10 RRLR 1044 (SD Ga 1965), 11 RRLR 705 (SD Ga 1965), 255 FSupp 88 (SD Ga 1966), 387 F2d 486 (CA 5 1967)
  • Chandler v Bd of Educ, Savannah  522.Ga.6a; IX,61—X,60; 313 F2d 636 (CA 5 1963), cd 375 US 835 (1963)
  • Emory University v Nash  522.Ga.7; VII,90—VIII,112; rev'd 127 SE2d 798 (Ga Sup Ct 1962)
  • Gaines v Bd of Educ (Dougherty Co)  522.Ga.8; VIII,112—XIII,155; 329 F2d 823 (CA 5 1964), 334 F2d 983 (CA 5 1964); 12 RRLR 200 (MD Ga 1966), 392 F2d 669 (CA 5 1968)
  • Harris v Gibson, Glynn Co Bd of Educ  522. Ga.9; IX,23—XI,43; 322 F2d 780 (CA 5 1963), cd 376 US 908 (1964); 333 F2d 55 (CA 5 1964)
  • Bivens v Bd of Pub Educ (Bibb Co)  522.Ga.10; IX,61—XI,43; 9 RRLR 639 (MD Ga 1964), 342 F2d 229 (CA 5 1965), 10 RRLR 617 (MD Ga 1965)
  • Bibb Co Bd of Ed v Evans  522.Ga.10a; X,61;9 RRLR 647 (Ga Super Ct 1963)
  • Bryan, Lockett v Muscogee Co Bd of Educ  522.Ga.11; IX,61—X,157; 342 F2d 225 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Acree v Richmond Co  522.Ga.12; IX,110—XI,43; 10 RRLR 615 (SD Ga 1964), 399 F2d 151 (CA 5 1968); 294 FSupp 1034 (SD Ga 1968), 301 FSupp 1285 (SD Ga 1969)
  • Harrington v Bd of Educ, Bd of School Commrs (Moultrie)  522.Ga.13; X,122—XII,65; 10 RRLR 1530 (MD Ga 1965); MCLL
  • Thomie v Bd of Educ (Houston Co)  522.Ga.14; X,157—XI,43; 10 RRLR 1538 (MD Ga 1965), 12 RRLR 812, 1873 (MD Ga 1967), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969)
  • Turner and US v Goolsby (Taliaferro Co)  522.Ga.15; XI,43—XII,66; 255 FSupp 724 (SD Ga 1965)
ILLINOIS
  • Webb v Bd of Educ (Chicago)  522.Ill.1; VII, 21—XI,43; 223 FSupp 466 (ND Ill 1963); MCLL
  • Webb v Bd of Educ  522.Ill.1a; IX,23
  • Illinois Bd of Educ v Chicago NAACP  522.Ill.lb; X,157—XI,14; MCLL
  • Burrows v Bd of Educ, Chicago  522.Ill.2; VII,90—IX,110
  • McNeese v Bd of Educ (Centreville)  522.Ill.3; VII,90—X,61; 199 FSupp 403 (ED Ill 1961), 305 F2d 783 (CA 3 1962), rev'd 373 US 668 (1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Tometz v Bd of Educ (Lake Co) (Waukegan School Dist)  522.Ill.5; XII,66—XIV,148; 237 NE2d 498 (Ill Sup Ct 1968); MCLL
  • Rajala v Bd of Educ (Joliet)  522.Ill.6; XIV, 149; 246 NE2d 74 (Ill App Ct 1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Madison Co)  522.Ill.7; XIV,149; 1 RRLS 171 (SD Ill 1969); MCLL
  • US v Bd of Educ (Cook Co)  522.Ill.8; XIV,149; 286 FSupp 786 (ND Ill 1968), 404 F2d 1125 (CA 7 1968); 301 FSupp 201 (ND Ill 1969); MCLL
INDIANA
  • Bell v School Bd, Gary  522.Ind.1; VIII,46—IX,61; 213 FSupp 819 (ND Ind 1963), aff'd 324 F2d 209 (CA 7 1963), cd 377 US 924 (1964); MCLL
  • Copeland v South Bend Community School Corp  522.Ind.2; XII,66—XIV,149; MCLL
  • Collier v Kokomo Center Township School Corp  522.Ind.3; XIII,156
  • US v Bd of Educ (Indianapolis)  522.Ind.4; XIV,149
  • Banks.v Wells (Muncie)  522.Ind.5; XIV,149
KANSAS
  • Brown v Bd of Educ (Topeka)  (522.Kan.a), 610.1; I,26,46; 98 FSupp 797 (DC Kan), 347 US 483 (1954), rev'd 349 US 294 (1955); MCLL; ACLU
  • Cameron v Bd of Educ (Bonner Springs)  522.Kan.1; III,60; 318 P2d 988 (Kan Sup Ct 1957)
  • Downs v Bd of Educ (Kansas City)  522.Kan.2; VII,91—X,157; 336 F2d 988 (CA 10 1964), 9 RRLR 1214 (1964), cd 380 US 914 (1965); MCLL
  • Londerholm v Unified School District (Kansas City)  522.Kan.3; XIII,156; aff'd & rev'd in pt 430 P2d 188 (Kan Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
KENTUCKY
  • Willis v Walker (Adair Co)  (522.Ky.a), 610.26; I,63,83; 136 FSupp 177 (WD Ky 1955)
  • Mitchell v Bd of Educ (Hopkins Co)  522.Ky.1; II,23,61; 2 RRLR 305 (WD Ky 1957)
  • Gordon v Collins (Webster Co)  522.Ky.2; II,23,62; 2 RRLR 304 (WD Ky 1957)
  • Garnett v Oakley (Union Co)  522.Ky.3; II,23,62; 2 RRLR 303 (WD Ky 1957)
  • Dishman v Archer, Supt of Pub Schools (Scott Co)  522.Ky.4; II,45—III,40; 2 RRLR 597 (ED Ky 1957)
  • Green v Bd of Educ (McCracken Co)  522.Ky.5; II,46—III,16
  • Wilburn v Holland, Supt, Fulton City Schools  522.Ky.6; II,46—III,40; 155 FSupp 419 (WD Ky 1957)
  • Vick v Fulton Bd of Educ  522.Ky.6a; XIII,156; 12 RRLR 1381 (WD Ky 1967)
  • Grimes v Smith (Owen Co)  522.Ky.7; III,40,60; 3 RRLR 454 (ED Ky 1958)
  • Spalding v Wooley (Franklin Co)  522.Ky.8; III, 60,84; rev'd & rem 293 SW2d 563 (Ky Ct of App 1956)
  • White v Loy (Barbourville School Dist and Knox Co)  522.Ky.9; VI,70
  • White v Singleton (Knox Co)  522.Ky.9a; VI,70,122
  • Walker v Richmond Bd of Educ  522.Ky.10; VII,118—VIII,141; 8 RRLR 950 (ED Ky 1963)
  • Mack v Bd of Educ, Frankfort  522.Ky.11; VIII, 46—IX,110; 8 RRLR 945 (ED Ky 1963)
  • Mason v Jessamine Co Bd of Educ  522.Ky.12; VIII,85—IX,24; 8 RRLR 530 (ED Ky 1963)
  • Lawrence v Bowling Green Bd of Educ  522.Ky.13; VIII,112; 8 RRLR 74 (WD Ky 1963)
  • Rimbert v Knott Co Bd of Educ  522.Ky.14; IX,110; 8 RRLR 1419 (ED Ky 1963)
  • Senters v Bd of Educ, Mayfield  522.Ky.15; IX,110; 8 RRLR 1420 (WD Ky 1962)
LOUISIANA
  • Bush v Orleans Parish School Bd  522.La.1; II,24—X,157; 138 FSupp 336,337 (ED La 1956), pet for mandamus den 351 US 948 (1956); 242 F2d 156 (CA 5 1957), cd 354 US 921 (1957); 252 F2d 253 (CA 5 1958), cd 356 US 969 (1958); 187 FSupp 42 (ED La 1960), 191 FSupp 871 (ED La 1961), per curiam aff'd 367 US 908 (1961); per curiam aff'd 368 US 11 (1961); 205 FSupp 893 (ED La 1962), 308 F2d 491 (CA 5 1962), 9 RRLR 667, 1747 (ED La 1964), 230 FSupp 509 (ED La 1964); MCLL
  • US v Jackson, La Supt of Public Educ  522.La.1a; VI,70,122
  • St Augustine High School v Louisiana High School Athletic Assn  522.La.lb; XIII,156; 270 FSupp 767 (ED La 1967), aff'd 396 F2d 224 (CA 5 1968)
  • Hall v St Helena Parish School Bd  522.La.2; II,24—XIII,156; 197 FSupp 649 (ED La 1961), 287 F2d 376 (CA 5 1961), cd 368 US 830 (1961); 9 RRLR 668 (CA 5 1964), 233 FSupp 136 (ED La 1964), 9 RRLR 1226 (CA 5 1964), 335 F2d 481 (CA 5 1964), 10 RRLR 1066 (ED La 1965), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Angel v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (La Trade Schools)  522.La.3; II,24—X,157; 287 F2d 33 (CA 5 1961), 8 RRLR 1075 (ED La 1963); MCLL
  • Williams v State Bd of Educ  522.La.3a; X,122,155; MCLL
  • Davis v E Baton Rouge Parish School Bd  522.La.4; II,24—XIII,157; 287 F2d 380 (CA 5 1961), 214 FSupp 624 (ED La 1963), 219 FSupp 876 (ED La 1963), 269 FSupp 60 (ED La 1967); MCLL
  • Tureaud v Bd of Supers, Louisiana State Univ  522.La.5; II,24,41; 116 FSupp 248 (ED La 1953), rev'd 207 F2d 807 (CA 5 1953), vac & rem 347 US 971 (1954); 225 F2d 434 (CA 5 1955), 226 F2d 714 (1955), 1 RRLR 110 (CA 5 1956), vac 228 F2d 895 (1956)
  • Williams v Prather (Northwestern State College)  522.La.6; II,24—VII,54
  • Bd of Supervisors v Ludley (Louisiana State Univ)  522.La.7; II,62—IV,31; 252 F2d 372 (CA 5 1958), cd 358 US 819, 820 (1958)
  • Bailey v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (McNeese State College)  522.La.8; II,62—IV,31; 252 F2d 372 (CA 5 1958), cd 358 US 820 (1958)
  • Lark v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (Southwestern La Inst)  522.La.9; II,62—IV,108; 252 F2d 372 (CA 5 1958), cd 358 US 820 (1958)
  • Bd of Supers of Louisiana State Univ v Fleming (New Orleans Campus)  522.La.10; IV,31,83; 265 F2d 736 (CA 5 1959)
  • Allen v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (Shreveport Trade School)  522.La.11; V,93—VII,54; 287 F2d 32 (CA 5 1961), cd 368 US 830 (1961); MCLL
  • Guillory v Admr, Tulane Univ  522.La.12; VII,91—IX,24; 203 FSupp 855 (ED La 1962), 207 FSupp 554 (ED La 1962), 306 F2d 489 (CA 5 1962), 212 FSupp 674 (ED La 1962)
  • Harris, Crayton v School Bd (St John the Baptist Parish)  522.La.13; VIII,85—XIII,157; 10 RRLR 63, 1560 (ED La 1965), 12 RRLR 1290 (ED La 1967), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • US v School Bd (Bossier Parish)  522.La.14; VIII,85—XIII,157; 220 FSupp 243 (WD La 1963), aff'd 336 F2d 197 (CA 5 1964), cd 379 US 1000 (1965)
  • Lemon and US v Bossier Parish School Bd  522.La.14a; X,122—XI,44; 10 RRLR 1073 (WD La 1965), vac & rem 349 F2d 1020 (CA 5 1965), 240 FSupp 709 (WD La 1965), 370 F2d 847 (CA 5), cd 388 US 911 (1967); 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Booker v Calasieu Parish School Bd  522.La.15; IX,62—X,157
  • Conley v Lake Charles School Bd  522.La.16; IX,62—XII,66; 10 RRLR 627 (WD La 1965), 293 FSupp 84 (WD La 1968), 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), rev'd 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969), cd 396 US 904 (1969)
  • Williams v Iberville Parish School Bd (Plaquemines)  522.La.17; IX,62—XIII,157; 9 RRLR 1748 (ED La 1964), 268 FSupp 923 (ED La 1967), 273 FSupp 542 (ED La 1967), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 1224, 1231, 1236 (ED La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • McCoy v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (Northeast State College)  522.La.18; IX,62—XI,44; 229 FSupp 735 (ED La 1964), 332 F2d 915 (CA 5 1964), rev'd 345 F2d 720 (CA 5 1964)
  • Welch v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (Southern U)  522.La.19; IX,62—X,157
  • Naguin v Terrebone Parish School Bd  522.La.20; IX,111—X,62; 8 RRLR 1421 (ED La 1963)
  • Redman v Bd of Educ (Terrebone Parish)  522.La.20a; XI,44—XII,66
  • Nweze v Bd of Supers, Louisiana State Univ, A & M (New Orleans)  522.La.21; IX,111—X,62; 8 RRLR 884 (ED La 1963)
  • Anderson v Bd of Suprs (La State U)  522.La.22; X,62; 9 RRLR 603 (ED La 1964)
  • Poindexter v Louisiana Financial Assistance Commn  522.La.23; X,63—XIII,157; 258 FSupp 158 (ED La), 275 FSupp 833 (ED La), aff'd 389 US 571 (1968); 296 FSupp 686 (ED La), aff'd 393 US 17 (1968)
  • Valley v Bd of Educ (Rapides Parish)  522.La.24; X,122—XI,44; 392 F2d 721 (CA 5 1968), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Williams v Bd of Mgrs, Delgado Trades and Technical Inst (New Orleans)  522.La.25; X,123
  • Pls v Bd of Educ (Jefferson Parish)  522.La.26; X,123
  • Potts v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (La Polytechnic Inst)  522.La.27; X,123—XI,44
  • Carter v School Bd (W Feliciana)  522.La.28; X,158—XIV,149; 349 F2d 1020 (CA 5 1965), 10 RRLR 1056 (ED La 1965), 303 FSupp 1224, 1231, 1236 (ED La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969), vac 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 226 (1969), cd 396 US 1032 (1969)
  • Smith v School Bd (St Tammany Parish)  522.La.29; X,158—XII,66; 10 RRLR 639 (ED La 1965), 302 FSupp 106 (ED La 1969); MCLL
  • Trahan v Lafayette Parish School Bd  522.La.30; X,158—XI,44; 244 FSupp 583 (WD La 1965), 10 RRLR 643, 1581 (WD La 1965), 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Monteilh v Bd of Educ (St Landry Parish)  522.La.31; XI,44—XII,66; 244 FSupp 583 (WD La 1965), 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Dandridge v School Bd (Jefferson Parish)  522.La.32; XI,44; 10 RRLR 1061 (ED La 1965)
  • Jamieson v Louisiana State Bd of Educ  522.La.33; X,158—XI,44; 10 RRLR 1004 (ED La 1965)
  • Holliday v La State Bd of Educ  522.La.33a; XII,66—XIII,157
  • US v La State Bd of Educ (New Orleans)  522.La.33b; XII,66
  • Burton v Louisiana State Bd of Educ (Northwestern State College of La); Potts v McKeithen (La Polytechnic Inst)  522.La.34; X,158; 10 RRLR 116 (ED La 1965)
  • LeBeauf v State Bd of Educ of La  522.La.35; X,158—XI,44; 244 FSupp 256 (ED La 1965); MCLL
  • Gordon v School Bd (Jefferson Davis Parish)  522.La.36; X,158—XI,44; 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Jones v School Bd (Caddo Parish)  522.La.37; XI,44—XIII,157; 392 F2d 721 (CA 5 1968), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Robertson v School Bd (Natchitoches Parish)  522.La.38; XI,44; 10 RRLR 1572 (WD La 1965)
  • Graham v Evangeline Parish School Bd  522.La.39; XI,44; 244 FSupp 583 (WD La 1965); 392 F2d 721 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Moore v Tangitahoa Parish School Bd  522.La.40; XI,44; 10 RRLR 638 (ED La 1965), 304 FSupp 244 (ED La 1969), 421 F2d 1407 (CA 5 1969)
  • Dunn v Livingston Parish Bd of Educ  522.La.41; XI,44—XIII,157; 10 RRLR 1063 (ED La 1965), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • George v Davis (E Feliciana Parish)  522.La.42; XI,45—XIV,149; 268 FSupp 923 (ED La 1967), 303 FSupp 1224, 1231, 1236 (ED La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969), vac 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 22 (1969)
  • Jenkins v Bogalusa School Bd  522.La.43; XI,45—XII,66; 10 RRLR 1068 (ED La 1965)
  • Banks v Bd of Educ (Claiborne Parish)  522.La.44; XI,45—XIII,157; 10 RRLR 1543 (WD La 1965), 349 F2d 1022 (CA 5 1965), 372 F2d 836 (1966), 380 F2d 385 (1967), 403 F2d 181 (1968); 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (1969), 420 F2d 692 (CA 5 1969)
  • Johnson and US v Bd of Educ (Jackson Parish)  522.La.45; XI,45—XIII,158; 372 F2d 836 (CA 5 1966), 380 F2d 385 (CA 5 1967), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 394 (1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969), 420 F2d 692 (CA 5 1969)
  • Henderson v Iberia Parish School Bd  522.La.46; XI,45; 245 FSupp 419 (WD La 1965)
  • Charles and US v Bd of Educ (Ascension Parish)  522.La.47; XI,45—XIII,158; 10 RRLR 1556 (ED La 1965)
  • Williams v Kimbrough (Madison Parish)  522.La.48; XI,45—XII,67; 415 F2d 874 (CA 5), 421 F2d 1351 (CA 5 1969)
  • Battise v Bd of Educ (Acadia Parish)  522.La.49; XI,45; 244 FSupp 583 (WD La 1965), 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Boyd and US v Bd of Educ (Pointe Coupee Parish)  522.La.50; XI,45—XIII,158; 10 RRLR 1053 (ED La 1965), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 1236 (ED La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Thomas v Bd of Educ (W Baton Rouge Parish)  522.La.51; XI,45—XIII,158; 10 RRLR 1076 (ED La 1965), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 1236 (ED La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Thomas v St Martin Parish School Bd  522.La.52; XII,67; 245 FSupp 601 (WD La 1965), 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • Andrews v Bd of Educ (Monroe)  522.La.53; XII,67; 10 RRLR 1541 (WD La 1965), rem 349 F2d 1022 (CA 5 1965)
  • Moses v Bd of Educ (Washington Parish)  522.La.54; XII,67—XIII,158; 302 FSupp 362 (ED La 1969), 304 FSupp 1112 (ED La 1969); MCLL
  • Gilbert v Bd of Educ (Webster Parish)  522.La.55; XII,67; 11 RRLR 168 (WD La 1965), 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969)
  • Smith v School Bd (Concordia Parish)  522.La.56; XII,67—XIV,149; 11 RRLR 173 (WD La 1965), 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968); 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 226 (1969)
  • Hill v School Bd (La Fourche Parish)  522.La.57; XII,67
  • Celestain v Vermillion Parish School Bd  522.La.58; XII,67; 303 FSupp 394 (WD La 1969), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Lincoln Parish)  522.La.59; XII,67; 403 F2d 181 (CA 5 1968), 417 F2d 801 (CA 5 1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Plaquemines Parish)  522.La.60; XII,67—XIII,158; 12 RRLR 1299 (ED La 1967)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Richland)  522.La.61; XII,67—XIII,158
  • US v Bd of Educ (Bienville)  522.La.62; XII,67—XIII,158
  • US v Bd of Educ (La Salle)  522.La.63; XII,67—XIII,158
  • US v Bd of Educ (Grant Parish)  522.La.64; XII,67—XIII,158
  • US (Intervenor) v Bds of Educ (Jackson Parish  et al), 522.La.65; XII,67
  • Banks v School Bd (St James Parish)  522.La.66; XIII,158; 12 RRLR 1279 (ED La 1967)
MARYLAND
  • Robinson v Bd of Educ (St Mary's Co)  522.Md.1; II,24
  • Slade v Bd of Educ (Harford Co)  522.Md.2; II,24—III,61; 252 F2d 291 (CA 4 1958), cd 357 US 906 (1958)
  • Christmas v Bd of Educ (Harford Co)  522.Md.2a; IX,111—X,123; 231 FSupp 331 (DC Md 1964)
  • Groves v Bd of Educ (St Mary's Co)  522.Md.3; III,84—IV,61; 261 F2d 527 (CA 4 1958)
  • Hart v Bd of Educ (Charles Co)  522.Md.4; III,84—IV,61; 164 FSupp 50 (DC Md 1958)
  • Pettit v Bd of Educ (Harford Co)  522.Md.5; V,63—VI,38; 5 RRLR 379 (DC Md 1960)
  • State Bd of Pub Welfare v Myers (Md Training Schools)  522.Md.6; V,93—VII,22; 167 A2d 765 (Md Ct of App 1961)
  • CORE v Bd of Educ (Prince Georges Co)  522.Md.7; X,158
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Barksdale v Springfield School Comm  522.Mass.1; X,123—XI,45; 348 F2d 261 (CA 1 1965), 10 RRLR 1085 (CA 1 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • New Bedford v Commr of Educ  522.Mass.2; XI,45; 208 NE2d 814 (Mass Sup Ct 1965)
  • Paris v Bd of Educ (Medford)  522.Mass.3; XIV,149; 305 FSupp 356 (DC Mass 1969)
MICHIGAN
  • Henry v Godsell  522.Mich.1; IV,61; 165 FSupp 87 (ED Mich 1958)
  • Woods v Bd of Educ (Highland Park)  522.Mich.2; VII,22; 6 RRLR 892 (ED Mich 1962); MCLL
  • Sherrill School Parents Comm v Bd of Educ (Detroit)  522.Mich.3; VII,54—X,123; MCLL
  • Student Workers v High School Cooperative Occupational Training Program (Ann Arbor) (Human Relations Commn)  522.Mich.4; XIII,158
MISSISSIPPI
  • Meredith v Fair (U of Mississippi)  522.Miss.1; VI,122—VIII,47; 298 F2d 696 (CA 5 1962), 7 RRLR 739 (CA 5 1962); 202 FSupp 224 (SD Miss 1962), 305 F2d 341 (CA 5 1962), 306 F2d 374 (CA 5 1962), 83 SCt 10 (1962), cd 371 US 828 (1962); MCLL
  • Greene v Fair (U of Mississippi)  522.Miss.1a; VIII,113—X,63; 8 RRLR 111 (SD Miss 1963), 314 F2d 200 (CA 5 1963)
  • US v Gov Barnett, Lt Gov Johnson (Univ of  Miss), 522.Miss.1b; IX,24; at 41.3, 41.3a
  • Singleton and US v Bd of Educ (Jackson)  522.Miss.2; VIII,113—XII,67; 348 F2d 729 (CA 5 1965), 10 RRLR 1096 (SD Miss 1965), 355 F2d 865 (CA 5 1966), 357 F2d 653 (CA 5 1966), 419 F2d 1211 (CA 5 1969)
  • Hudson v Leake Co School Bd  522.Miss.3; VIII,113—XII,68; 219 FSupp 691 (SD Miss 1963), 326 F2d 237, 328 F2d 408 (CA 5 1964); 232 FSupp 241 (SD Miss 1964), 9 RRLR 171, 1239 (SD Miss 1964), 11 RRLR 175 (SD Miss 1965), 357 F2d 653 (CA 5 1966), cd 385 US 933 (1966)
  • US v Biloxi  522.Miss.4; VIII,141—X,63; 326 F2d 237 (CA 5 1964)
  • Mason v Biloxi Sep School Dist  522.Miss.4a; IX,62—X,63; 328 F2d 408 (CA 5 1964); 232 FSupp 241 (SD Miss 1964)
  • US v Gulfport  522.Miss.5; VIII,141—X,63; 326 F2d 237 (CA 5 1964)
  • McDowell v Tubb (Univ of Miss Law School)  522.Miss.6; IX,24—X,63
  • Donald v U of Mississippi Bd of Trs of Higher Educ  522.Miss.7; IX,111; 9 RRLR 612 (SD Miss 1964)
  • Henry v Bd of Educ (Clarksdale)  522.Miss.8; X,63—XII,68; 9 RRLR 678 (ND Miss 1964), 11 RRLR 719 (ND Miss 1965), 409 F2d 682 (CA 5 1969)
  • Gladney v School Dist (Moss Point Muni Separate)  522.Miss.9; X,123—XI,46; 10 RRLR 1108 (SD Miss 1965)
  • Anderson v Bd of Educ (Canton City & Madison Co)  522.Miss.10; X,123—XII,68; 10 RRLR 1092 (SD Miss 1965), 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • Killingsworth v Bd of Educ (Clark Co)  522.Miss.11; X,158—XI,46; 10 RRLR 1112 (SD Miss 1965)
  • Barnhardt v Meridian Separate School Dist  522.Miss.12; X,158—XII,68; 10 RRLR 1587 (SD Miss 1965), 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • Mississippi v Levy and Morse (Meridian)  522.Miss.12a; XI,46
  • Alexander v Holmes Co Bd of Educ  522.Miss.13; XI,46—XIV,149; 10 RRLR 1089 (SD Miss 1965), 12 RRLR 1314 (1965), 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • Blackwell v Issaquena and Sharkey Cos Bd of Educ  522.Miss.14; XI,46—XII,68; 10 RRLR 1591 (SD Miss 1965), 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • Mississippi v Sander (Issaquena)  522.Miss.14a; XI,46
  • Cowan v Bd of Educ (Bolivar Co)  522.Miss.15; XI,46—XII,68; 10 RRLR 1600 (ND Miss 1965)
  • Mississippi v Bartley (Shaw)  522.Miss.16; XI,46
  • Mississippi v Feinglass (Benton Co)  522.Miss.17; XI,47
  • Baird v Benton Co Bd of Educ  522.Miss.17a; XII,68; 10 RRLR 1583 (ND Miss 1965)
  • US v North Pike Co Consolidated School Dist  522.Miss.18; XI,47—XIII,158; 12 RRLR (SD Miss 1967), 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Carroll Co)  522.Miss.19; XII,68; 10 RRLR 1609 (ND Miss 1965)
  • US v Muni Sep School Dist (Aberdeen)  522.Miss.20; XII,68; 10 RRLR 1605 (ND Miss 1965)
  • Ayers v Western Line Consol School Dist  522.Miss.21; XII,68—XIII,158
  • US (Intervenor) v Miss State Educ Finance Commn  522.Miss.22; XII,68
  • US v Sunflower Co Bd of Educ  522.Miss.23; XII,68—XIII,158
  • US v Indianola, Sunflower Co  522.Miss.24; XII,68—XIII,159; 410 F2d 626 (CA 5 1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Le Flore Co)  522.Miss.25; XII,68—XIII,159
  • US v Bd of Educ (Amite Co)  522.Miss.26; XII,68—XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v So Pike Bd of Educ  522.Miss.27; XII,68—XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Calhoun Co)  522.Miss.28; XII,68—XIII,159
  • US v Bd of Educ (Lauderdale Co)  522.Miss.29; XII,69—XIII,159
  • US v Philadelphia Muni Separate School Dist  522.Miss.30; XII,69—XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ (Louisville)  522.Miss.31; XII,69—XIII,159
  • US v Bd of Educ (Noxubee)  522.Miss.32; XII,69—XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v Kemper Co School Bd  522.Miss.33; XII,69—XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v Bd of Educ of Iuka (Tishomingo Co)  522.Miss.34; XII,69—XIII,159
  • US v Bd of Educ (Wilkinson Co)  522.Miss.35; XII,69—XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), vac 396 US 19 (1969)
  • US v Grenada (Oxford)  522.Miss.36; XII,69—XIII,159
  • US v Bd of Educ (Corinth)  522.Miss.37; XII,69—XIII,159
  • US v Natchez Special Municipal Separate School District  522.Miss.38; XIII,159; 417 F2d 852 (CA 5 1969), 423 F2d 1264 (CA 5 1969), 396 US 19 (1969)
MISSOURI
  • Russell v Adams, Heffley (Maplewood-Richmond High School) (St Louis Co)  522.Mo.1; V,39—VI,123
  • Davis v Bd of Educ, Charleston Consol School Dist  522.Mo.2; VIII,48,113; 216 FSupp 295 (ED Mo 1963)
  • Lewis v Bd of Educ (Deering)  522.Mo.3; VIII,142—X,63
  • St Louis Bd of Educ v NAACP  522.Mo.4; X,63
NEW JERSEY
  • Anderson v Bd of Educ (Englewood)  (522.NJ.a), 610.5; I,26
  • Howard Saving Institution v Trs, Amherst College  522.NJ.1; V,63—VI,95; 170 A2d 39 (NJ Sup Ct 1961)
  • Beal v Bd of Educ (Newark)  522.NJ.2; VII,22,54
  • Shepard v Bd of Educ (Englewood)  522.NJ.3; VII,54,119; 7 RRLR 354 (DC NJ 1962); MCLL
  • Allen v Bd of Educ (Orange)  522.NJ.4; VII,91,119; 7 RRLR 354 (DC NJ 1962); MCLL
  • Fisher v School Bd of Orange  522.NJ.4a; VII,91—X,64; 8 RRLR 730 (NJ Comm'r of Ed 1963); MCLL
  • Booker v Bd of Educ (Plainfield)  522.NJ.5; X,158—XI,47; 212 A2d 1 (NJ Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Byers v Bd of Educ (Bridgeton)  522.NJ.6; XII,69; MCLL
  • Eliot v Bd of Educ (Neptune)  522.NJ.7; XIII,159; 228 A2d 696 (Super Ct App Div 1967)
  • Rice v Bd of Educ (Montclair)  522.NJ.8; XIII,159; MCLL
NEW MEXICO
  • Tijerina v Henry  522.NM.1; XIV,150
NEW YORK
  • Mallory v New York City Bd of Educ  522.NY.1; IV,31,61
  • Matter of Skipwith  522.NY.2; IV,31,108; 180 NYS2d 852 (NY Sup Ct 1958); MCLL
  • Rector v New York City Bd of Educ  522.NY.3; V,16,93
  • New York v Dennis (New Rochelle)  522.NY.4; VI,38—XII,69; 208 NYS2d 522 (New Rochelle City Ct 1960)
  • Taylor v Bd of Educ (New Rochelle)  522.NY.4a; VI,38—IX,112; 195 FSupp 231 (SD NY 1961), 294 F2d 36 (CA 2 1961), cd 368 US 940 (1961); 221 FSupp 275 (SD NY 1963); MCLL; NLG
  • Rector v Bd of Educ, New York City  522.NY.5; VII,54—VIII,85
  • Bannister v Bd of Educ, New York City  522.NY.5a; VIII,48,85
  • Allen v Bd of Educ (Queens)  522.NY.5b; XIII,159
  • Branche v Bd of Educ (Hempstead)  522.NY.6; VII,91—X,64; 7 RRLR 361 (ED NY 1962); MCLL
  • Matter of Mitchell (Malverne Bd of Educ)  522.NY.6a; VII,91—XIII,159; 251 NYS2d 480 (Sup Ct App Div 1964), 256 NYS2d 922 (Sup Ct App Div 1965), 12 RRLR 223 (Sup Ct 1966; NY State Dept of Educ 1967), 12 RRLR 1667 (Malverne NY Bd of Educ; NY Commr of Ed 1967)
  • Blacker v Bd of Educ (Manhasset)  522.NY.7; VII,91—X,64; 226 FSupp 208, 229 FSupp 709, 714 (ED NY 1964); MCLL
  • Bates v State Univ of New York  522.NY.8; VII,119
  • Aikens v Bd of Educ (Rochester)  522.NY.9; VII,119—X,64
  • Bailey v Bd of Educ, School Dist #1 (Westbury)  522.NY.10; VII,119—X,64; MCLL
  • Dixon v Bd of Educ (Buffalo)  522.NY.11; X,158—XI,47; MCLL
  • Davis v Bd of Educ (Glen Cove)  522.NY.12; XII,69; MCLL
  • Bristow v Union Free School Dist #8 (Roosevelt)  522.NY.13; XII,69—XIII,160; 12 RRLR 489 (NY State Bd of Educ 1966)
  • Students v NYC Bd of Educ  522.NY.14; XII,69—XIII,160
  • Hall v Union Free Dist #6 (Freeport)  522.NY.15; XII,69
  • Bedford v Union Free School Dist #6 (Babylon)  522.NY.16; XII,69—XIII,160
  • Bd of Educ v Allen (Mt Vernon)  522.NY.17; XII,69—XIV,150; 301 NYS2d 764 (Sup Ct App Div 1969)
  • Oliver v Donovan (NYC)  522.NY.18; XIV,150; MCLL
  • Oliver v Donovan (NYC)  522.NY.18a; XIV,150; 306 FSupp 286 (ED NY 1968); MCLL
  • Bishop v Golden (NYC)  522.NY.19; XIV,150
  • In the Matter of Donovan (NYC)  522.NY.20; XIV,150
  • In Matter of Marvin Short (New Hyde Park)  522.NY.21; XIV,150
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Doby v Brown  (522.NC.a), 610.54; I,47; 135 FSupp 584 (MD NC 1955), 232 F2d 504 (CA 4 1956)
  • Frasier v Bd of Trs, Univ of North Carolina  (522.NC.b), 620.11; I,48,84; 134 FSupp 589 (MD NC 1955)
  • Carson v Bd of Educ (McDowell Co)  522.NC.1; II,24,62; 227 F2d 789 (CA 4 1955)
  • Covington v Edwards (Montgomery Co School Bd)  522.NC.2; II,24—V,16; 264 F2d 780 (CA 4 1959)
  • Joyner v Bd of Educ (McDowell Co)  522.NC.3; II,46,62; 92 SE2d 795 (NC Sup Ct 1956)
  • Royster v Bradsher (Person Co)  (522.NC.c), 522.NC.3; II,80
  • Weaver v Bd of Trs, Chapel Hill Graded Schools  522.NC.4; III,16—IV,108
  • Jeffers v Whitley (Caswell Co)  522.NC.6; III,40—VIII,113; 7 RRLR 22 (MD NC 1961), 165 FSupp 951 (MD NC 1961), 309 F2d 621 (CA 4 1962); 197 FSupp 84 (MD NC 1963)
  • Holt v Raleigh City Bd of Educ  522.NC.7; III,40 —V,93; 265 F2d 95 (CA 4 1959), cd 361 US 818 (1960)
  • McKissick v Bd of Educ (Durham)  522.NC.8; IV,83—V,17; 176 FSupp 3 (MD NC 1959)
  • Cannon v Greensboro City Bd of Educ, North Carolina Advisory Comm on Educ, North Carolina State Bd of Educ  522.NC.9; IV,82—V,39
  • McCoy v Bd of Educ (Greensboro)  522.NC.10; IV,83—VII,55; 283 F2d 667 (CA 4 1960), 6 RRLR 721 (1961)
  • Morrow v Bd of Educ (Mecklenburg)  522.NC.11; IV,83—VI,123; 195 FSupp 1097 (WD NC 1961)
  • Swann v Bd of Educ (Charlotte-Mecklenburg)  522.NC.11a; X,158—XI,47; 243 FSupp 667 (WD NC 1965), 10 RRLR 1145 (CA 4 1965)
  • Swann and US v Bd of Educ (Charlotte-Mecklenburg)  522.NC.11b; XII,69—XIII,160; 243 FSupp 667 (WD NC 1965), 369 F2d 29 (CA 4 1966), 300 FSupp 1358 (WD NC 1969), 306 FSupp 1291 (WD NC 1969), 306 FSupp 1299 (WD NC 1969)
  • Griffith v Bd of Educ (Yancey Co)  522.NC.12; V,39—XI,47; 186 FSupp 511 (WD NC 1960)
  • Becton v Greene Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.13; V,63—VIII,85
  • Farmer v Greene Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.13a; VIII,86—XI,47; 10 RRLR 1133 (CA 4 1964)
  • Wheeler v Spaulding (Durham)  522.NC.14; V,63—XII,69; 196 FSupp 71 (MD NC 1961), 309 F2d 630 (CA 4 1962), 326 F2d 759 (CA 4 1964), 346 F2d 768 (CA 4 1965); 249 FSupp 145 (MD NC 1966), 363 F2d 738 (CA 4 1966)
  • Spaulding v Bd of Educ (Durham City)  522.NC.14a; VI,71—XI,47; 196 FSupp 71 (MD NC 1961), 309 F2d 630 (CA 4 1962), 8 RRLR 975 (MD NC 1963), 326 F2d 759 (CA 4 1964), 10 RRLR 656 (MD NC 1964), 346 F2d 768 (CA 4 1965), 249 FSupp 145 (MD NC 1966), 363 F2d 738 (CA 4 1966)
  • Thompson v Bd of Educ (Durham Co)  522.NC.14b; VIII,142—XI,47; 10 RRLR 173 (MD NC 1964), 418 F2d 1041 (CA 4 1969)
  • Vickers v Bd of Educ (Chapel Hill)  522.NC.15; V,63—VII,55; 196 FSupp 97 (MD NC 1961)
  • North Carolina v Chance (Harnett Co)  522.NC.16; VI,39
  • North Carolina v Chance (Harnett Co)  522.NC.16a; VI,39
  • Felder v Bd of Educ (Harnett Co)  522.NC.16b; VI,39—X,64; 224 FSupp 472 (ED NC 1963)
  • Felder v Bd of Educ (Harnett Co)  522.NC.16c; IX,63—XI,47; 9 RRLR 1276 (ED NC 1964), 349 F2d 366 (CA 4 1965)
  • Wynn v Trs, Charlotte Community College System  522.NC.17; VI,123—VIII,113; 122 SE2d 404 (NC Sup Ct 1961)
  • Hunter v Raleigh City Bd of Educ  522.NC.18; VIII,49—X,65
  • Belo v Bd of Educ (Randolph Co)  522.NC.19; VIII,49—XI,47; 8 RRLR 1432 (MD NC 1963), 9 RRLR 199 (MD NC 1964)
  • Conley v Transylvania Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.20; VIII,49—IX,25
  • Gilmore v High Point Bd of Educ  522.NC.21; VIII,86—X,65; 9 RRLR 714 (MD NC 1964)
  • Cabaniss v Shelby Bd of Educ  522.NC.22; VIII,113—IX,63
  • Ford v Cumberland Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.23; VIII,113—XI,47; 10 RRLR 651 (ED NC 1964)
  • Ziglar v Reidsville Bd of Educ  522.NC.24; VIII,113—XI,47; 9 RRLR 207 (MD NC 1964)
  • DuBissette v Cabarrus Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.25; IX,25—X,159; 9 RRLR 205 (MD NC 1964)
  • Turner v Warren Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.26; IX,25—XI,47; 10 RRLR 654 (ED NC 1965)
  • Gill v Concord City Bd of Educ  522.NC.27; IX,63—XIII,160; 10 RRLR 167 (MD NC 1964), 12 RRLR 233 (MD NC 1966)
  • Williams v Hendersonville Bd of Educ  522.NC.28; IX,63—XI,47; 10 RRLR 177 (WD NC 1964)
  • Bowditch v Buncombe Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.29; IX,63—XI,47; 9 RRLR 1270 (WD NC 1964), 10 RRLR 161 (CA 4 1965)
  • Sowers v Lexington City Bd of Educ  522.NC.31; IX,113—XI,48; 10 RRLR 171 (MD NC 1965)
  • Nesbitt v Statesville Bd of Educ  522.NC.32; IX,113—XI,48; 232 FSupp 288 (WD NC 1964), 9 RRLR 1278 (WD NC 1964), 10 RRLR 161 (CA 4 1965)
  • Eaton v New Hanover Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.33; IX,113—XI,48
  • Barrow v Bd of Educ (Washington City)  522.NC.34; X,123,159
  • Burns v Wilkes Co  522.NC.35; X,123—XI,48; 10 RRLR 165 (MD NC 1965)
  • Clayton v Bd of Educ (Person Co)  522.NC.36; X,123—XIII,160; 10 RRLR 166 (MD NC 1965), 12 RRLR 228 (MD NC 1966)
  • Teel v Pitt Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.37; X,123—XI,48; 272 FSupp 703 (ED NC 1967)
  • Hickman v Craven Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.38; X,123—XI,48
  • Young v Bd of Educ (Tryon)  522.NC.39; XI,48
  • Bryant v Bd of Educ (Carteret Co)  522.NC.40; XI,48
  • Wilson v Bd of Educ (Hickory)  522.NC.41; XI,48
  • Coppedge and US v Bd of Educ (Franklin Co)  522.NC.42; XII,70—XIII,160; I ACQ 24; 11 RRLR 743 (ED NC 1966), 12 RRLR 1333 (ED NC 1967), 273 FSupp 289 (ED NC 1967), 293 FSupp 356 (ED NC 1968), 404 F2d 1177 (CA 4 1968)
  • Hawkins v NC State Bd of Educ  522.NC.43; XII,70; 11 RRLR 745 (WD NC 1966)
  • Boomer v Beaufort Co Bd of Educ  522.NC.44; XII,70; 294 FSupp 179 (ED NC 1968)
  • Jones v Bd of Educ (Pamlico Co)  522.NC.45; XIII,160; 12 RRLR 1342 (ED NC 1967)
OHIO
  • Clemons v Bd of Educ (Hillsboro)  (522.Ohio.1), 610.4; I,26,101; 228 F2d 853 (CA 6 1956), cd 350 US 1006 (1956); ACLU
  • Lynch v Bd of Educ (Kenston)  522.Ohio.2; X,66; 229 FSupp 740 (ND Ohio 1964)
  • Ward v Bd of Educ (Cleveland)  522.Ohio.3; X,159
  • Cragget v Bd of Educ (Cleveland)  522.Ohio.4; XII,70—XIII,160; 234 FSupp 381 (ND Ohio 1964), 338 F2d 941 (CA 6 1964); MCLL
  • Deal v Bd of Educ (Cincinnati)  522.Ohio.5; XII,70—XIV,150; 244 FSupp 572 (SD Ohio 1965), 369 F2d 55 (CA 6 1966), cd 389 US 847 (1967); MCLL
  • Re Antioch College  522.Ohio.6; XIV,150
OKLAHOMA
  • Sipuel v Bd of Regents, Univ of Oklahoma  (522.Okla.a); 332 US 631 (1948); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Grant v Taylor (El Reno College)  (522.Okla.b), 620.9; I,28
  • Troullier v Oklahoma College for Women  (522.Okla.c), 620.10; I,28
  • Burrough v Jenkins (Red Bird)  (522.Okla.d), 610.14; I,46,62
  • Matlock v Bd of Co Commr's (Wagoner Co)  (522.Okla.e), 610.50; I,27; 281 P2d 169 (Okla Sup Ct 1955)
  • Riddle v Bd of Co Commr's (Wagoner Co)  (522.Okla.f), 610.58; I,63
  • Carr v Cole, Pres Earlsboro Independent School Dist (Pottawatomie Co)  522.Okla.1; II,80; 2 RRLR 316 (WD Okla 1957)
  • Brown v Long, Pres Morris Independent School Dist (Okmulgee Co)  522.Okla.2; II,80—IV,61; 3 RRLR 1151 (ED Okla 1957)
  • Sims v Hudson, Pres Preston Independent School Dist (Okmulgee Co)  522.Okla.3; II,80—III,84
  • Bailey v Hodge, Hall, Supt, Oklahoma School for Deaf  522.Okla.4; II,80—III,61
  • Jefferson v McCart, Collins, Liberty Independent School Dist (Okmulgee Co)  522.Okla.5; IV,32,61; 3 RRLR 1154 (ED Okla 1958)
  • Dowell v Bd of Educ (Oklahoma City)  522.Okla.6; VII,23—XIV,150; 219 FSupp 427 (WD Okla 1963), 244 FSupp 971 (WD Okla 1965), aff'd 375 F2d 158 (CA 10 1967), cd 387 US 931 (1967), vac & rem 396 US 269 (1969)
  • Hill v New Lima Bd of Educ  522.Okla.7; IX,25—X,124
  • Complaint Against Sand Springs Bd of Educ  522.Okla.8; X,124
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Pennsylvania v Bd of Dir of City Trusts (Girard's Estate)  522.Pa.1; II,62—IV,83; 138 A2d 844 (Pa Sup Ct 1958), cd 357 US 570 (1958); MCLL
  • Re Girard College  522.Pa.la; X,159—XIII,161; 127 A2d 287 (Pa Sup Ct 1956), 353 US 230 (1957); 138 A2d 844 (Pa Sup Ct 1958), 357 US 570 (1958); 224 A2d 761 (Pa Sup Ct 1966), 270 FSupp 782 (ED Pa 1967)
  • Sealy v Dept of Pub Inst of Pennsylvania (Darby Township)  522.Pa.2; III,58; 252 F2d 898 (CA 3 1958), cd 356 US 975 (1958)
  • Chisholm v Bd of Educ, Philadelphia  (522.Pa.3), 522.Pa.1; VI,123—XI,48; 240 FSupp 862 (ED Pa 1965)
  • Mills and Hamilton, Exec v Philadelphia  (522.Pa.4), 522.Pa.2; IV,83; 144 A2d 728 (NJ Super Ct 1958)
  • Chester School Dist v Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm  522.Pa.5; X,124—XI,151; 224 A2d 811 (Dauphin Co Ct 1966), 233 A2d 290 (Pa Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Pennsylvania Human Relations Commn v Bd of Ed (Philadelphia)  522.Pa.6; XIV,151; MCLL
  • Re Pennsylvania State Board of Higher Educ  522.Pa.7; XIV,151
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Briggs v Elliott (Clarendon Co)  522.SC.1; II, 24—X,66; 98 FSupp 529 (ED SC), 342 US 350 (1952); 103 FSupp 920 (ED SC), 347 US 483 (1954), rev'd 349 US 294 (1955); 132 FSupp 776 (1955); MCLL; ACLU
  • Brunson v Bd of Trs, Clarendon Co School Dist  522.SC.2; V,63—XIII,161; 30 FRD 369 (ED SC 1962), 311 F2d 107 (CA 4 1962), cd 373 US 933 (1963); 244 FSupp 859 (ED SC 1965), 10 RRLR 1634 (ED SC 1965), 12 RRLR 831 (ED SC 1967), 271 FSupp 586 (ED SC 1967)
  • Miller and US v School Dist No 2, Clarendon Co  522.SC.2a; XII,70; 253 FSupp 552 (ED SC 1966), 256 FSupp 370 (ED SC 1966)
  • Johnson v Trs, School Dist #20 (Charleston Co)  522.SC.3; VI,71—VII,55
  • Hood v Bd of Trs (Sumter Co)  522.SC.4; VI,71—VII,23; 295 F2d 390 (CA 4 1961); MCLL; ACLU
  • Stanley v Darlington Co School Dist  522.SC.5; VII,119—X,66; 9 RRLR 1293 (ED SC 1964)
  • Brown v School Dist #20 (Charleston Co)  522.SC.6, 522.NC.30; VII,119—IX,113; 226 FSupp 819 (ED SC 1963), 328 F2d 618 (CA 4 1964)
  • Gantt v Clemson Agri College of South Carolina  522.SC.7; VII,119—IX,25; 320 F2d 611 (CA 4 1963), cd 375 US 814 (1963)
  • Monteith v Univ of South Carolina  522.SC.9; VIII,142
  • Randall v Sumter School Dist No 2  522.SC.10; IX,25—XI,48; 232 FSupp 786 (ED SC 1964), 241 FSupp 787 (ED SC 1965); MCLL
  • Whittenberg v Greenville Co School Dist  522.SC.11; IX,25—X,66; 9 RRLR 719 (WD SC 1964)
  • Adams v School Dist No 5 (Orangeburg Co)  522.SC.12; IX,113—XII,70; 232 FSupp 692 (ED SC 1964); MCLL
  • Crawford v Bd of Educ (Chesterfield Co)  522.SC.13; X,67
  • NAACP v South Carolina Dept of Educ  522.SC.14; X,159
  • Wheeler v School Dist #3 (Clarendon Co)  522.SC.26; XII,70; 298 FSupp 784 (ED SC 1966)
TENNESSEE
  • McSwain v Bd of Educ (Anderson Co)  (522.Tenn.a), 610.17; I,47,83; 104 FSupp 861 (ED Tenn 1952)
  • Kelley v Bd of Educ (Nashville)  522.Tenn.1; II,25—XII,70; 270 F2d 209 (CA 6 1959), cd 361 US 924 (1959)
  • Boyce v Humphreys Co Bd of Educ  522.Tenn.la; VII,23—XI,48; 7 RRLR 372 (MD Tenn 1961)
  • Booker v Tenn State Bd of Ed (Memphis State Coll)  522.Tenn.2; II,25—IV,108; 240 F2d 689 (CA 6 1957), cd 353 US 965 (1957)
  • Ward v Bd of Educ (Knoxville)  522.Tenn.3; III,40—V,40
  • Blakney v Tennessee Bd of Educ (Memphis State University)  522.Tenn.4; IV,32—V,17
  • Hayes v Co School Comm (Rutherford Co)  522.Tenn.5; V,17,40; 4 RRLR 874 (MD Tenn 1959)
  • Goss v Bd of Educ (Knoxville)  522.Tenn.6; V,40—XI,48; 301 F2d 164 (CA 6), 305 F2d 523 (CA 6 1962), rev'd 373 US 683 (1963); 10 RRLR 1642 (ED Tenn 1965)
  • Northcross v Bd of Educ (Memphis)  522.Tenn.7; V,63—X,159; 302 F2d 818 (CA 6 1962), cd 370 US 944 (1962); 333 F2d 661 (CA 6 1964)
  • Mapp v Bd of Educ (Chattanooga)  522.Tenn.8; V,63—X,67; 295 F2d 617 (CA 6 1961), 203 FSupp 843 (SD Tenn 1962), 319 F2d 571 (CA 6 1963)
  • Maxwell v Bd of Educ (Davidson Co)  522.Tenn.9; VI,40—XII,70; 203 FSupp 768 (MD Tenn 1960), aff'd 301 F2d 164, 828 (CA 6 1962), 319 F2d 858 (CA 6 1963), rev'd 373 US 683 (1963)
  • Sloan v 10th School Dist (Wilson Co)  522.Tenn.10; VII,23—XI,48; 6 RRLR 999 (MD Tenn 1961), 8 RRLR 1440 (MD Tenn 1963), 9 RRLR 1306 (MD Tenn 1964), 10 RRLR 677 (MD Tenn 1965)
  • Vick v Bd of Educ (Obion Co)  522.Tenn.11; VII,23—XII,70; 6 RRLR 1001 (WD Tenn 1961), 205 FSupp 436 (WD Tenn 1962), 11 RRLR 776 (WD Tenn 1965)
  • Monroe v Bd of Educ (Jackson)  522.Tenn.12; VIII,113—XIV,151; 221 FSupp 968 (WD Tenn 1963), 229 FSupp 580 (WD Tenn 1964), 244 FSupp 353 (WD Tenn 1965), 11 RRLR 209 (WD Tenn 1966), 11 RRLR 774 (WD Tenn 1966), 380 F2d 955 (CA 6), vac & rem 391 US 450 (1968); MCLL
  • Monroe v Bd of Educ (Madison Co)  522.Tenn.12a; XIII,161; 269 FSupp 758 (WD Tenn 1965), 380 F2d 955 (CA 6 1967), vac & rem 391 US 450 (1968)
  • Robinson v Brown (Madison Co)  522.Tenn.13; VIII,143—X,159; 320 F2d 503 (CA 6 1964), cd 376 US 908 (1964)
  • Carson v Bd of Ed (Monroe Co)  522.Tenn.13a; X,159—XI,49; 10 RRLR 671,1640 (ED Tenn 1964-65)
  • Robinson v Shelby Co Bd of Educ  522.Tenn.14; VIII,143—X,68; 9 RRLR 209 (WD Tenn 1964)
  • Hill v Franklin Co Bd of Educ  522.Tenn.15; IX,64—XII,70; 9 RRLR 723 (ED Tenn 1964), 232 FSupp 671 (ED Tenn 1964), 10 RRLR 1646 (ED Tenn 1965), aff'd 390 F2d 583 (CA 6 1968)
  • US v Campbell Co Bd of Educ  522.Tenn.16; X,124; 10 RRLR 178 (ED Tenn 1965)
  • McConnell v Bd of Educ Johnson City  522.Tenn.17; X,124; 10 RRLR 674 (ED Tenn 1965)
  • US v Crockett Co Bd of Educ  522.Tenn.18; XII,70—XIII,161
  • McFerren and US v Bd of Educ (Fayette Co)  522.Tenn.19; XII,71
  • US v Bd of Educ (Dyersburg)  522.Tenn.20; XII,71—XIII,161
  • US v Bd of Educ (Haywood Co)  522.Tenn.21; XIII,161; 271 FSupp 460 (WD Tenn 1967)
TEXAS
  • White v Smith (Univ of Texas)  (522.Tex.b), 620.4; I,28,47
  • Atkins v Matthews, Pres, N Texas State College  (522.Tex.c), 620.5; I,28,64; 1 RRLR 323 (ED Tex 1955)
  • Jackson v Rawdon (Mansfield)  522.Tex.1; II,25,46; 135 FSupp 936 (ND Tex 1955)
  • Avery v Wichita Falls, Independent School Dist  522.Tex.2; II,25,62; 241 F2d 230 (CA 5 1957), cd 353 US 938 (1957)
  • Whitmore v Stilwell (Texarkana Jr College)  522.Tex.3; II,25,80; 227 F2d 187 (CA 5 1955)
  • Jackson v McDonald, Pres of Lamar State College of Tech  522.Tex.4; II,25,80
  • Britton v Folsom (Bd of Educ, Dallas)  522.Tex.5; II,25—XII,71; 133 FSupp 811 (ND Tex 1955), 233 F2d 796 (CA 5 1956), cd 352 US 878 (1956); 146 FSupp 485 (ND Tex 1956), 247 F2d 268 (CA 5 1957), 250 F2d 690, 850 (CA 5 1957), 275 F2d 850 (CA 5 1960); 184 FSupp 402 (ND Tex 1960), 348 F2d 158 (CA 5 1965); 10 RRLR 1173 (ND Tex 1965), 350 F2d 1022 (CA 5 1965)
  • Hernadez v Driscoll Cons Ind School Dist (Nueces Co)  522.Tex.6; II,46,80; 2 RRLR 34, 329 (SD Tex 1957)
  • Ross v Eckels (Houston)  522.Tex.7; II,80—XII,71; 2 RRLR 1114 (SD Tex 1957), 312 F2d 191 (CA 5 1962), 8 RRLR 1442 (SD Tex 1963), 11 RRLR 216 (SD Tex 1965)
  • Dallas Independent School Dist v Edgar  522.Tex.8; IV,32—V,40
  • Pl v Bd of Educ (Abilene)  522.Tex.9; V,17—VI,40
  • Flax v Potts (Fort Worth)  522.Tex.10; V,40—XII,71; 6 RRLR 1006 (ND Tex 1961), 204 FSupp 458 (ND Tex 1962), aff'd 313 F2d 284 (CA 5 1962); 218 FSupp 254 (ND Tex 1963)
  • Simons v Edwards (Friendship School Dist)  522.Tex.11; V,40,64,94
  • Shipp v White (W Texas State College)  522.Tex.12; V,40; 5 RRLR 740 (ND Tex 1960)
  • Robinson v Evans (Galveston)  522.Tex.13; V,40—VI,71
  • Eastland v Wheat (Bd of Educ, Houston)  522.Tex.14; VI,40—X,68
  • Evans v Brooks (Texas City)  522.Tex.15; VII,23—VIII,51
  • Sanders v Ransom (U of Texas)  522.Tex.16; VII,55—X,68; MCLL
  • Thomas v Bowen (Bryan)  522.Tex.17; VIII,51—IX,26
  • McGrue v Williams (Waco Div)  522.Tex.18; VIII,86,143
  • Adams v Mathews (Longview)  522.Tex.19; VIII,86,143
  • Carter v Hix (Bd of Educ, Gatesville)  522.Tex.20; VIII,114—X,68
  • Rainwater v Smith (Carrollton)  522.Tex.21; VIII,143
  • Smith v Flowers (Southwest Texas State)  522.Tex.22; VIII,143
  • Miller v Barnes (Georgetown Bd of Educ)  522.Tex.23; VIII,143—X,68; 328 F2d 810 (CA 5 1964)
  • Kreger v Bd of Trs, Georgetown Ind School Dist  522.Tex.23a; IX,114; 368 SW2d 873 (Tex Ct of Civ App 1963); 369 SW2d 917 (Tex Sup Ct 1963)
  • Bd of Higher Educ (Rice U) v Carr  522.Tex.24; VIII,143—X,159; 9 RRLR 613 (Harris Co Dist Ct 1964)
  • Price v Denison Ind School Dist  522.Tex.25; IX,64—XI,49; 9 RRLR 739 (ED Tex 1964), 348 F2d 1010 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Brown v Hendrix (Bd of Educ, Beaumont)  522.Tex.26; IX,64—XI,49; 228 FSupp 698 (ED Tex 1964)
  • Richard v Christ (Bd of Educ, Jefferson Co)  522.Tex.27; IX,64—X,69; 228 FSupp 698 (ED Tex 1964), vac & rem 377 F2d 460 (CA 5 1967)
  • Hightower v McFarland (Houston)  522.Tex.28; XII,71; 11 RRLR 214 (SD Tex 1966), rev'd & rem 355 F2d 468 (CA 5 1966)
VIRGINIA
  • Jordan v Day  (522.Va.a), 610.60; I,64
  • Dobbins v Virginia  (522.Va.b), 523.Va.1; II,26,63; 96 SE2d 154 (Va Sup Ct 1957)
  • Bd of Supervisors v Griffin (Prince Edward Co)  522.Va.1; II,25—XII,71; 347 US 483 (1954); 349 US 294 (1955); 142 FSupp 616, 149 FSupp 431 (ED Va 1957), 249 F2d 462 (CA 4 1957), cd 355 US 953 (1958); 164 FSupp 786 (ED Va 1958), 266 F2d 507, 511 (CA 4 1959), 322 F2d 332 (CA 4 1963), 133 SE2d 565 (Va Sup Ct 1963), 375 US 391 ( (1964); 377 US 218 (1964); 9 RRLR 1313 (ED Va 1964), 10 RRLR 1180 (ED Va 1965), cd 385 US 960 (1966); MCLL
  • Griffin v Bd of Supervisors (Prince Edward Co)  522.Va.1a; VII,24—IX,14; 126 SE2d 22 (Va Sup Ct of App 1962)
  • Howard v Co School (Alleghany Co)  522.Va.1b; VII,56; 122 SE2d 891 (Va Sup Ct of App 1961)
  • Corbin v Co School Bd (Pulaski Co)  522.Va.2; II,25—V,64; 177 F2d 924 (CA 4 1949)
  • Atkins v School Bd (Newport News)  522.Va.3; II,25—V,94; 246 F2d 325 (CA 4 1957), 355 US 855 (1957)
  • Adkinson v School Bd, Newport News  522.Va.3a; V,40—VIII,51; 148 FSupp 430 (ED Va 1957), aff'd 246 F2d 325 (CA 4 1957), cd 355 US 855 (1957)
  • Hill v Norfolk School Bd  522.Va.4; II,26—VIII,51; 282 F2d 473 (CA 4 1960); 9 RRLR 1315 (ED Va 1964)
  • James v Almond (Norfolk)  522.Va.4a; IV,62; 170 FSupp 331 (ED Va 1959), dism'd 359 US 1006 (1959)
  • Harrell, City Att'y v Gov Almond (Norfolk)  522.Va.4b; IV,62
  • NAACP v Gov Almond (Norfolk)  522.Va.4c; IV,62
  • Petitioners v Norfolk City Council  522.Va.4d; IV,62
  • Hill v School Bd (Norfolk)  522.Va.4e; V,94; 185 FSupp 459 (ED Va 1959), aff'd 282 F2d 473 (CA 4 1960)
  • Beckett v School Bd (Norfolk)  522.Va.4f; X,69—XII,71; 9 RRLR 1315 (ED Va 1964), 349 F2d 414 (CA 4 1965); 11 RRLR 218 (ED Va 1965), 269 FSupp 118 (ED Va 1967), 302 FSupp 18 (ED Va 1969), 308 FSupp 1274 (ED Va 1969)
  • Dillard v Charlottesville School Bd  522.Va.5; II,26—IX,115; 289 F2d 439 (CA 4 1961), 308 F2d 920 (CA 4 1962), cd 374 US 827 (1963)
  • Brooks v Co School Bd, Arlington Co  522.Va.6; II,26—IX,115; 144 FSupp 239 (ED Va 1957), 240 F2d 59 (CA 4 1957), 252 F2d 929 (CA 4 1957), cd 356 US 958 (1958); 204 FSupp 620 (ED Va 1962), 324 F2d 303 (CA 4 1963); MCLL
  • DeFebio v Co School Bd (Fairfax Co)  522.Va.7; II,81—III,85; 100 SE2d 760 (Va Sup Ct of App 1957), dism'd 357 US 218 (1958)
  • Calloway v Farley (Richmond)  522.Va.8; III,41; 2 RRLR 1121 (ED Va 1957)
  • Klein v Falls Church School Bd  522.Va.9; III,41
  • Walden v Farley (Suffolk Co)  522.Va.10; III,41
  • Estes v Farley (Norfolk Co)  522.Va.11; III,41
  • Jordan v Farley (Nansemond Co)  522.Va.12; III,41
  • Kilby v Warren Co School Bd  522.Va.13; IV,34—X,69; 6 RRLR 121 (WD Va 1960)
  • Warden v School Bd (Richmond)  522.Va.14; IV,34—VII,56; 6 RRLR 1025 (ED Va 1961)
  • Bradley v Bd of Educ (Richmond)  522.Va.14a; VII,24—XII,71; 317 F2d 429 (CA 4 1963), 345 F2d 310 (CA 4 1965), 10 RRLR 179 (CA 4 1965), vac 382 US 103 (1965); MCLL
  • Hundley v School Bd (Alexandria)  522.Va.15; IV,34,62
  • Jones v School Bd (Alexandria)  522.Va.15a; V,41—VII,56; 278 F2d 72 (CA 4 1960)
  • Braxton v Stafford Co School Bd  522.Va.15b; VII,24—VIII,86
  • Virginia Atty Genl Almond v Virginia Controller  522.Va.16; IV,61,83
  • Walker v School Bd (Floyd Co)  522.Va.17; V,17,95; 5 RRLR 714 (WD Va 1960)
  • Brooks v School Bd (Galax)  522.Va.18; V,17,95
  • Blair v School Bd (Grayson Co)  522.Va.19; V,17,95
  • Goins v School Bd (Grayson Co)  522.Va.19a; V,95—VII,56; 202 F2d 343 (CA 4 1960)
  • Blackwell v Fairfax Co School Bd  522.Va.20; V,95—VIII,52; 5 RRLR 1056 (ED Va 1960)
  • Blakeney v Fairfax Co School Bd  522.Va.20a; IX,115—X,124; 226 FSupp 713 (ED Va 1964), 334 F2d 239 (CA 4 1964); 231 FSupp 1006 (ED Va 1964)
  • Green v Bd of Educ (Roanoke)  522.Va.21; VI,72—X,70; 6 RRLR 1016 (WD Va 1961), 304 F2d 118 (CA 4 1962), 8 RRLR 1046 (WD Va 1963)
  • Marsh v Roanoke Co School Bd  522.Va.21a; VIII,52; 6 RRLR 1021 (WD Va 1961), 305 F2d 94 (CA 4 1962)
  • Blackwell v School Bd (Fairfax Co)  522.Va.22; VI,95; 5 RRLR 1056 (ED Va 1960)
  • Jackson v School Bd (Lynchburg)  522.Va.24; VII,24—X,70; 201 FSupp 620 (WD Va 1962), rev'd 308 F2d 918 (CA 4 1962); 203 FSupp 701 (WD Va 1962), rev'd 321 F2d 230 (CA 4 1963)
  • Anderson v School Bds, West Point and King Williams Cos  522.Va.25; VII,24—VIII,143; 7 RRLR 710 (ED Va 1962)
  • McLeod v Chesterfield Co School Bd, Virginia Pupil Placement Bd  522.Va.26; VII,93—X,70
  • Williams v Winchester School Bd  522.Va.27; VII,93—X,70
  • Scott v School Bd (Fredericksburg)  522.Va.28; VII,93—X,70
  • Brown v Co School Bd, Frederick Co  522.Va.29; VIII,52—XI,49; 234 FSupp 808 (WD Va 1964), 327 F2d 655 (CA 4 1964), 346 F2d 22 (CA 4 1965), 245 FSupp 549 (WD Va 1965)
  • Gilliam v Bd of Educ (Hopewell)  522.Va.30; VIII,143—XII,71; 332 F2d 460 (CA 4 1964), 345 F2d 460 (CA 4), vac 382 US 103 (1965)
  • Buckner v Greene Co School Bd  522.Va.31; VIII,143—X,70; 9 RRLR 742 (WD Va 1964), 332 F2d 452 (CA 4 1964)
  • Bell v Co School Bd, Powhatan Co  522.Va.32; IX,26; 321 F2d 494 (CA 4 1963)
  • Powhatan Co School Bd v Pupil Placement Bd  522.Va.32a; IX,26; 8 RRLR 1037 (Richmond Cir Ct 1963)
  • Pettaway v Co School Bd (Surry Co)  522.Va.33; IX,115—XI,49; 230 FSupp 480 (ED Va 1964), 332 F2d 457 (CA 4 1964), 339 F2d 486 (CA 4 1964); 10 RRLR 1183 (ED Va 1965)
  • Belton v King George Co School Bd  522.Va.34; IX,115—X,70; 8 RRLR 1443 (ED Va 1963)
  • US v Prince George Co  522.Va.35; X,70; 221 FSupp 93 (ED Va 1963)
  • Hill v Bd of Educ (Prince George Co)  522.Va.35a; X,71; 9 RRLR 1326 (ED Va 1964)
  • Pls v Virginia State Bd of Educ  522.Va.36; X,125
  • Booker v Bd of Educ (Amelia Co)  522.Va.37; XI,49
  • Wright v Bd of Educ (Greenville Co)  522.Va.38; XI,49—XII,71; 252 FSupp 378 (ED Va 1966); MCLL
  • Brown v Bd of Educ (Gloucester Co)  522.Va.39; XI,49—XII,71
  • Bowman v Bd of Educ (Charles City Co)  522.Va.40; XI,49—XIII,161; rem 382 F2d 326 (CA 4 1967); 293 FSupp 1201 (ED Va 1968)
  • Green v Bd of Educ (New Kent Co)  522.Va.41; XI,49—XIV,151; 304 F2d 118 (CA 4 1962); 7 RRLR 725 (WD Va 1962), 8 RRLR 1046 (WD Va 1963), rev'd 382 F2d 326 (CA 4 1967), vac & rem 391 US 430 (1968)
  • Johnson v Bd of Educ (Middlesex Co)  522.Va.42; XI,49
  • Walker v Bd of Educ (Brunswick Co)  522.Va.43; XI,49
  • King v Bd of Educ (Fauquier Co)  522.Va.44; XI,49
  • Turner v Bd of Educ (Goochland Co)  522.Va.45; XI,49—XII,71; 252 FSupp 578 (ED Va 1966)
  • Kier v Bd of Educ (Augusta Co)  522.Va.46; XI,49—XII,71; 249 FSupp 239 (WD Va 1966),
  • Copeland v Bd of Educ (Portsmouth)  522.Va.47; XI,49
  • Thompson v Bd of Educ (Hanover Co)  522.Va.48; XII,72; 252 FSupp 546 (ED Va 1966)
  • Franklin v Bd of Educ (Campbell Co)  522.Va.49; XII,72
  • Sweet Briar Institute v Button  522.Va.50; XIII,161; rev'd & rem 387 US 423 (1967); 280 FSupp 312 (WD Va 1967)
  • Corbin v Bd of Educ (Loudoun Co)  522.Va.51; XIII,161; 283 FSupp 60 (ED Va 1967); MCLL
  • Betts v Co School Bd of Halifax Co  522.Va.52; XIII,162; 269 FSupp 593 (WD Va 1967)
  • Bell v Bd of Educ (Staunton)  (522.Va.53), 522.Va.47; XII,71; 249 FSupp 249 (WD Va 1966)
WEST VIRGINIA
  • Dunn v Bd of Educ (Greenbrier Co)  (522.WVa.a), 610.21; I,47,63
  • Anderson v Bd of Educ (Mercer Co)  (522.WVa.b), 610.29; I,83; 1 RRLR 892 (SD WVa 1955)
  • Martin v Bd of Educ (McDowell Co)  (522.WVa.c), 610.30; I,83,102
  • Shedd v Bd of Educ (Logan Co)  (522.WVa.d), 610.43; I,103
  • Pierce v Bd of Educ (Cabell Co)  522.WVa.1; II,26—IV,83
  • Wilkinson v Bd of Educ (Harrison Co)  522.WVa.2; II,47
  • Taylor v Bd of Educ (Raleigh Co)  522.WVa.3; VII,56—X,71; 1 RRLR 321 (SD WVa 1956)
WISCONSIN
  • Amos v Bd of Educ (Milwaukee)  522.Wisc.1; XIII,162—XIV,151
  • In re Bd of Educ (Milwaukee)  522.Wisc.1a; XIV,151
523. Suits To Prevent Integration (and 204, 213, 223, 522)
ARKANSAS
  • Shackleford v Vance, Hoxie School Bd  523.Ark.1; II,26; 238 F2d 91 (CA 8 1956)
  • Ex Parte Rector (Little Rock)  523.Ark.2; III,17
  • Wilbern v Blossom, Little Rock School Bd  523.Ark.3; III,17,85
  • Arkansas v NAACP  523.Ark.4; III,17
  • Bates v Little Rock  523.Ark.5; III,17,70; 319 SW2d 37 (Ark Sup Ct 1958), rev'd 361 US 516 (1960)
  • Faubus v US (Little Rock)  523.Ark.6; III,41—IV,34; 254 F2d 797 (CA 8 1958), cd 358 US 829 (1958)
  • Jackson v Col Kuhn, Nat'l Guard (Little Rock)  523.Ark.7; III,41,62
  • Thomason v Cooper (Little Rock)  523.Ark.8; III,41,62
  • Lauderdale v Arkansas  523.Ark.9; VI,72; 343 SW2d 422 (Ark Sup Ct 1961)
CALIFORNIA
  • Acacia and Pi Beta Phi Fraternities v Regents (U of California)  523.Calif.1; X,71,125; MCLL
CONNECTICUT
  • Guida v Bd of Educ (New Haven Co)  523.Conn.1; XII,72; 213 A2d 843 (Super Ct 1965)
  • Norwalk CORE v Bd of Educ (Norwalk)  523.Conn.2; XIV,151; 298 FSupp 203, 208, 210, 213 (DC Conn 1968, 1969)
FLORIDA
  • Bd of Public Inst (Manatee Co) v Florida  (523.Fla.a), 610.52; I,27; 75 S2d 832 (Fla Sup Ct 1954)
  • Florida (Miami) v Foster  523.Fla.1; III,17
  • Bd of Pub Inst (Volusia Co) v Tillman  523.Fla.2; V,64—VII,24
GEORGIA
  • Cook, Atty Genl v Bd of Educ (Valdosta)  (523.Ga.a), 610.59; I,63,103
  • Patrick Henry School v Oxford, Georgia Revenue Commr  523.Ga.1; IV,109
  • Georgia v Griffith (U of Ga)  523.Ga.2; VI,72
  • Atlanta v Hilltop Apts  523.Ga.3; VII,56; 119 SE2d 576 (Ga Sup Ct 1961)
  • Aikens v School Bd (Atlanta)  523.Ga.4; VII,120
  • Bd of Educ (Taylor Co) v US  523.Ga.5; XII,72
ILLINOIS
  • Teachers v Bd of Educ (East St Louis)  523.Ill.1; XIV,152; 1 RRLS 171 (SD Ill 1969)
IOWA
  • Mesquakie Indians v US Bureau of Indian Affairs (So Tama)  523.Ia.1; XIV,152
KENTUCKY
  • Grubbs v Governor Chandler  523.Ky.1; II,26
LOUISIANA
  • Re Atty Genl Gremillion  523.La.1; VI,42; 181 FSupp 37 (WD La 1960)
  • Wagner v Redmond (Orleans Parish)  523.La.2; VII,24; 127 S2d 275 (La Ct of App 1960)
MARYLAND
  • Williams v School Bd (Anne Arundel Co)  523.Md.1; II,26
  • Williams v School Bd (Howard Co)  523.Md.2; II,26,81
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Boston School Committee v State Bd of Educ  523.Mass.1; XIII,162; 227 NE2d 729 (Mass Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
MICHIGAN
  • Jipping v Manning  523.Mich.1; XIV,152; 166 NW2d 472 (Mich Sup Ct 1969)
NEW JERSEY
  • Morean v Montclair Bd of Educ  523.NJ.1; IX,115; 200 A2d 97 (NJ Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Fuller v Volk (Englewood)  523.NJ.2; IX,116—XII,72; writ den Raubinger v Angelli, 377 US 902 (1964); 230 FSupp 25 (DC NJ 1964), vac & rem 351 F2d 323 (CA 3 1965); 250 FSupp 81 (DC NJ 1966)
  • Clarke v Bd of Educ (Englewood)  523.NJ.2a; XII,72; MCLL
  • Schults v Bd of Educ (Teaneck)  523.NJ.3; X,160—XI,49; aff'd 205 A2d 762 (NJ Super Ct, App Div 1964), 210 A2d 762 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • Concerned Citizens League v Bd of Educ of Bridgeton  523.NJ.4; XIII,162
NEW YORK
  • Balabin v Rubin (Brooklyn)  523.NY.1; IX,26—XI,49; 250 NYS2d 281 (NY Ct of App 1964), cd 379 US 881 (1964); MCLL
  • Vetere v Mitchell, Allen (Hempstead)  523.NY.2; IX,27—XII,72; 245 NYS2d 682 (Albany Co Sup Ct 1963), 251 NYS2d 480 (NY Sup Ct, App Div 1964), 15 NY2d 259 (NY Ct of App 206 NE2d 174, cd 382 US 825 (1965); MCLL
  • Schnepp v Donovan (Queens)  523.NY.2; X,71—XI,50; 252 NYS2d 543 (Queens Co Sup Ct 1964)
  • Van Blerkom v NYC Bd of Educ  523.NY.2; X,71—XI,50; 207 NE2d 503 (NY Ct of App 1965)
  • Olson v Bd of Educ (Union Free School Dist #12) (Malverne)  523.NY.2a; XII,72; 250 FSupp 1000 (ED NY 1966), 367 F2d 565 (CA 2 1966)
  • Strippoli v Bickal (Rochester)  523.NY.3; IX,116—XI,50; 248 NYS2d 588 (NY Sup Ct 1964), 250 NYS2d 969 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1964), 261 NYS2d 84 (NY Ct of App 1965), 209 NE2d 123 (Ct of App 1965)
  • Addabbo v Donovan, Bd of Educ (Queens)  523.NY.4; X,71—XII,72; aff'd 261 NYS2d 68 (NY Ct of App 1965), cd 382 US 905 (1965); 16 NY2d 619 (Ct of App 1965), 209 NE2d 112 (Ct of App 1965); MCLL
  • Blumberg v Donovan (NYC)  523.NY.5; X,71—XI,50; 10 RRLR 152, 645 (NY Sup Ct, Queens 1964); MCLL
  • Reuss v Katz (NYC)  523.NY.6; X,72; 252 NYS2d 546 (NY Co Sup Ct 1964)
  • DiSano v Storandt (Rochester)  523.NY.7; X,72; 250 NYS2d 701 (Monroe Co Sup Ct 1964), 253 NYS2d 411 (Sup Ct, App Div 1966)
  • Katalinic v Syracuse  523.NY.7a; X,160; 254 NYS2d 960 (Onondaga Co Sup Ct 1964)
  • Etter v Littwitz (Monroe Co)  523.NY.8; XII,72; 262 NYS2d 924 (Sup Ct 1965)
  • Offerman v Nitkowski, Bd of Educ (Buffalo)  523.NY.9, 523.NY.11a; XII,72—XIII,159; 248 FSupp 129 (WD NY 1965), aff'd 378 F2d 22 (CA 2 1967); MCLL
  • Fishman v New York Education Department (Hartsdale)  523.NY.10; XIII,162
  • Radford v Gage and Bd of Educ (Geneva)  523.NY.11; XIV,152; 301 NYS2d 282 (Ontario Sup. Ct 1969)
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Constantian v Anson Co  523.NC.1; II,47; 93 SE2d 163 (NC Sup Ct 1956)
  • In re Application for Ressignment (Greensboro)  523.NC.2; III,42,62; 101 SE2d 359 (NC Sup Ct 1958)
OKLAHOMA
  • School Bd (Arcadia) v Poling, Co School Supt  523.Okla.1; IV,109—V,17
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Re Five Youths (Philadelphia)  523.Pa.1; VI,42
  • Briarcliffe Citizen Comm v Comm for Better Education (Delaware Co)  523.Pa.2; XIV,152
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Nash v Sharper, NAACP (Sumter)  523.SC.1; II,26,47
TENNESSEE
  • Davidson v Cope  523.Tenn.1; II,26,47
  • US v 16 Defendants  523.Tenn.2; II,47
  • Kasper v Brittain (Nashville)  (523.Tenn.3), 523.Tenn.2; II,47—III,17; 245 F2d 92 (CA 6 1957), cd 355 US 834 (1957)
TEXAS
  • McKinney v Blankenship (Big Spring School Dist)  (523.Tex.a), 610.53; I,27,47; 282 SW2d 691 (Tex Sup Ct 1955)
  • Barnes v Calvert, Compt (U of Tex)  523.Tex.1; II,26
  • Independent Sch Dist (Dallas) v Edgar  523.Tex.2; III,62,85; 255 F2d 455 (CA 5 1958)
VIRGINIA
  • Co School Bd (Hanover Co) v Shelton  (523.Va.1), 610.51; I,27,103; 93 SE2d 469 (VA Sup Ct of App 1956)
  • Wanner v Bd of Educ (Arlington Co)  523.Va.2; XI,50—XII,72; 245 FSupp 132 (ED Va 1965), rev'd 357 F2d 452 (CA 4 1966), 11 RRLR 788 (CA 4 1966); MCLL
524. Miscellaneous Suits To End Segregation (and 555)
  • Matlock v Bd of City Commrs  (524.a), 610.50; I,27; 281 P2d 169 (Okla Sup Ct 1955)
  • Adams v Le Blanc, Atty Genl  (524.b), 610.57; I,47,63; 1 RRLR 228 (Jud Ct 1955)
  • Shaffer v White Citizens' Council Forum, Mississippi Sovereignty Comm, Mississippi Gov Barnett, Treas Gandy  524.2; VI,72—IX,27
  • Cartban v Mississippi State School Bd  524.3; XI,50—XII,73; MCLL
525. Treatment of Minority Groups in School Books
526. Suits Against Sex Discrimination
  • Goin and Turner v Escondido Union High School Dist  (526.b), 524.1; IV,84
  • Bristol v Heaton  (526.c), 524.2; IV,84,109; 317 SW2d 86 (Tex Ct of Crim App 1958), cd 359 US 230 (1959)
  • Kissick v Garland Ind School Bd  (526.d), 524.3; V,17—VI,72; 330 SW2d 708 (Tex Ct of Civ App 1959)
  • Allred v Heaton  (526.e), 524.4; V,41—VI,96; 336 SW2d 251 (Tex Ct of Civ App 1960), app dism'd 364 US 517 (1961)
  • De Rivera v Bd of Educ (NYC)  (526.f), 524.4; XIV,152; MCLL
530. HOUSING-RACIAL, OTHER DISCRIMINATION (and 423)
531. In Public and Publicly-Assisted Housing-Urban Renewal (Title I)
  • Seawell v MacWithey and Erdman  (531.a); MCLL
  • Dorsey v Stuyvesant Town Corp  (531.b); MCLL
  • Polier v O'Dwyer  (531.c); MCLL
  • Detroit Housing Comm v Lewis  (531.d), 630.1; I,28,48,84; 226 F2d 180 (CA 6 1955)
  • Ward v Columbus Metropolitan Housing Auth  (531.e), 630.3; I,28,48
  • Davis v St Louis Housing Auth  (531.f), 630.6; I,48,64
  • Cohen v Public Housing Administration (Savannah)  531.1; II,26—V,64; 257 F2d 73 (CA 5 1958)
  • Watts v Housing Auth of Birmingham Dist  531.2; II,27,47
  • Askew v Benton Harbor Housing Comm  531.3; II,27,47; 2 RRLR 611 (WD Mich 1956)
  • Eleby v Louisville Municipal Housing Auth  531.5; II,63—IV,62; 3 RRLR 1199 (WD Ky 1958)
  • Sanders v Cruise, NYC Housing Auth  531.7; III,62
  • Barnes v Gadsden  531.8; IV,62—V,41; 268 F2d 593 (CA 5 1959), cd 361 US 915 (1959); MCLL
  • Tate v Eufaula  531.9; IV,109—V,18; 165 FSupp 303 (MD Ala 1958)
  • Arena v Columbia University (Comm on Human Rights)  531.10; VII,56—VIII,53
  • Smith v Holiday Inns of America (Nashville)  531.11; VIII,86—X,72; 220 FSupp 1 (MD Tenn 1963), 336 F2d 630 (CA 6 1964)
  • Johnson v Redevelopment Agency, Oakland, California  531.12; VIII,114—IX,116; 317 F2d 872 (CA 9 1963), cd 375 US 915 (1963); MCLL
  • Re House and Home, Ltd  531.13; IX,27—X,72
  • Gregory v Madison Mobile Homes Park  531.14; X,72; 128 NW2d 462 (Wis Sup Ct 1964)
  • Gilbert v Stamford  531.15; X,125,160; MCLL
  • Hill v Huger  531.16; X,160—XI,50; 171 So2d 167 (Fla Sup Ct 1965), 346 F2d 127 (CA 5 1965)
  • Redevelopment Agency of Fresno v Buckman  531.17; X,160—XII,73; 413 P2d 856 (Cal Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • 34 Negro Families v Alameda Housing Authority  531.18; XI,101
  • Green St Assn v Daley  531.20; XI,101—XIII, 162; 250 FSupp 139 (ND Ill 1966), aff'd 373 F2d 1 (CA 7 1967), cd 387 US 932 (1967)
  • Allen v Pulaski Housing Authority  531.21; XIII,162
  • El Cortez Heights Residents and Property Owners Assn v Tucson Housing Authority  531.22; XIV,152; 457 P2d 294 (Ariz Ct of App 1969)
  • US v Little Rock Housing Authority  531.23; XIV,153; MCLL
  • Gautreaux v Chicago Housing Authority  531.24, 423.Ill.4; XIII,122—XIV,153; 265 FSupp 582 (ND Ill 1967), 296 FSupp 907 (ND Ill 1969), 304 FSupp 736 (1969); MCLL
  • Hicks and Rayford v Weaver, Hughes (Bogalusa Housing Authority)  531.25; XIV,153; 302 FSupp 619 (ED La 1969)
  • Colon v Tompkins Square Neighbors  531.26; XIV,153; 289 FSupp 104 (SD NY 1968), 294 FSupp 134 (SD NY 1968)
  • Dailey v Lawton  531.27; XIV,153; 296 FSupp 266 (WD Okla 1969)
532. In Publicly-Assisted Housing-FHA and VA
  • Johnson v Levitt & Sons  (532.1), 640.1; I,28,48; 131 FSupp 114 (ED Pa 1955)
  • New York State Comm Against Discrimination v Pelham Hall  (532.2), 531.6; II,81—IV,34; 170 NYS2d 750 (Westchester Co Sup Ct 1958); MCLL
  • Pelham Hall Apts v NY State Comm Against Discrimination  (532.3), 531.6a; III,17
  • Re Tannenbaum and Gardner  (532.4), 531.6b; III,62
  • Matter of Pericone  (532.5), 531.6c; III,62,83
  • Pennsylvania v Williams  532.8; III,18,42; MCLL
  • O'Meara v Washington and Jones (Seattle)  532.18; IV,84—VII,120; 365 P2d 1 (Wash Sup Ct 1961), cd 369 US 839 (1962); MCLL
  • Matter of Martin v MacPherson Realty  532.19; IV,84
  • Levitt and Sons v State Division Against Discrimination  532.21; IV,109—V,95; 158 A2d 177 (NJ Sup Ct 1960), app dism'd 363 US 418 (1960); MCLL
  • Smith v Fromm and Morristown Gardens, Inc  532.22; IV,109—V,64; MCLL
  • Pearson v Frumenti  532.23; V,41—VII,120
  • Hudson v Branden Enterprises, Tropicana Village  532.24; V,65—X,72
  • Holmes v Bank of America  532.25; VI,42—IX,27; 30 CR 917 (Calif DCA 1963); MCLL
  • Gregory v Zehman  532.26; VI,72—X,125; MCLL
  • Jones v Haridor Realty Corp  532.27; VII,25,120; 181 A2d 481 (NJ Sup Ct 1962)
  • Paul v Lookofsky (Mayfield, Ky)  532.28; VII,120; 353 SW2d 549 (Ky Ct of App 1962)
  • Scott v Houston (Berkeley)  532.29; VIII,86—X,72
533. In Private Housing (see 535 re Referenda)
ALABAMA
  • Arrington v Fairfield  533.Ala.1; XIV,153; 414 F2d 687 (CA 5 1969)
CALIFORNIA
  • Francois v Cameron  (533.Calif.a), 533.36; VI,96
  • Burks v Poppy Construction Co  (533.Calif.1), 533.18; V,41—VII,93; 370 P2d 313 (Calif Sup Ct 1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • Gerrish v Shattuck  (533.Calif.2), 533.19; V,41—VI,72
  • Divine v Koch  (533.Calif.3), 533.22; V,65—X,72
  • Hudson v Nixon  (533.Calif.4), 533.23; V,96—VII,93; 20 CR 620 (Merced Co Super Ct 1960)
  • Campbell v Wong (San Francisco)  (533.Calif.5), 533.29; VI,43
  • Swann v Burkett  (533.Calif.6), 533.30; VI,43—VIII,144; 6 RRLR 833 (Muni Ct Alameda Co, Calif 1961), 209 CA2d 685 (Calif DCA 1962); MCLL
  • Droeger v DeVries, Select Realty & Rentals  (533.Calif.7), 533.37; VI,96—XIII,163
  • Vargas v Hampson  (533.Calif.8), 533.38; VI,96—VII,94; 370 P2d 322 (Calif Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
  • Johnson v Coldwell, Banker & Co  (533.Calif.9), 533.39; VII,26—X,72
  • Williams v University City  (533.Calif.10), 533.40; VII,26; MCLL
  • Ambler v Park Ave Investment Co  (533.Calif.11), 533.46; VII,57—VIII,87
  • Rhodes v Fick  (533.Calif.12), 533.47; VII,57
  • Lee v O'Hara  (533.Calif.13), 533.50; VII,94; 370 P2d 321 (Calif Sup Ct 1962)
  • Hutchinson v Abstract Investment Co  (533.Calif.14), 533.51; VII,94—VIII,115
  • Duff v McCoy  (533.Calif.15), 533.53; VII,121—IX,27; MCLL
  • Mims v Values  (533.Calif.16), 533.54; VIII,54—IX,65
  • Thomas v Goulis  533.Calif.17, 533.56; VIII,54—XII,73; rev'd 50 CR 910 (Calif Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • Kammer and Rowland v Marlon  (533.Calif.18), 533.59; VIII,87,144
  • California v Don Wilson Builders  (533.Calif.19), 533.63; IX,27—X,73; 33 CR 621 (Calif DCA 1963); MCLL
  • FEPC v Don Wilson Builders  (533.Calif.19a), 533.63a; IX,65—X,73
  • Wagner v O'Bannon  533.Calif.20, 533.65; IX,28—XIV,153; I ACQ 24; 79 CR 44 (Calif DCA 1969); MCLL; ACLU
  • Bell v Eyring Investment Co  (533.Calif.21), 533.66; IX,28—X,73
  • Diaman, Howard v Shannon  533.Calif.22, 533.73 IX,66—XIII,164
  • California FEPC v Williams  (533.Calif.23), 533.74; IX,66
  • In re Ciufo, Parker, Marlin  (533.Calif.24), 533.75; IX,66—X,74
  • Washington v Manwed  533.Calif.25, 533.82; IX,118—X,161; 10 RRLR 1278 (SF Muni Ct, Calif 1965); MCLL
  • Reitman v Mulkey  533.Calif.26, 533.85; X,126—XIII,163; 413 P2d 825 (Calif Sup Ct 1966), aff'd 387 US 369 (1967); MCLL; ACLU
  • Prendergast v Snyder  533.Calif.27, 533.86; X,126—XII,73; 413 P2d 825 (Calif Sup Ct 1966), aff'd 387 US 369 (1967); MCLL
  • Hill v Miller  533.Calif.28; X,126—XII,73; 413 P2d 852 (Calif Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • Grogan v Meyer  533.Calif.29, 533.88; X,126—XII,73; rev'd 413 P2d 845 (Calif Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • McEnany v Apartment House Bd of Govs  533.Calif.30; X,161
  • Peyton v Barrington  533.Calif.31; XI,102—XII,73; 50 CR 905 (Calif Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • Stevens v Del Amo Construction Co  533.Calif.32; XI,102
  • Tan v Wong  533.Calif.33; XII,73—XIII,163; MCLL
  • Ray v Briarwood South  533.Calif.34; XII,74—XIII,163
  • Glover v Ruth  533.Calif.35; XIII,164
  • Proctor v Westlake  533.Calif.36; XIII,164; MCLL
  • Allen v Parklane  533.Calif.38; XIII,164
  • Turner v Lazarus  533.Calif.39; XIV,154
  • Vaughn v Su  533.Calif.40; XIV,154; MCLL
  • Miller v WESCO Land Corp (Alameda Co)  533.Calif.41; XIV,154
  • Farwell v Bell  533.Calif.42; XIV,154
COLORADO
  • Colorado Anti-Discrimination Comm v Case  (533.Colo.1), 533.26; V,96—VIII,87; 6 RRLR 835 (DC Colo 1961), 380 P2d 34 (Colo Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
CONNECTICUT
  • McKinley Park Homes v Connecticut ex rel Cullers  (533.Conn.a), 531.4; II,47
  • Swanson v Connecticut Civil Rights Comm  (533.Conn.b), 533.35; VI,73—VII,25; 6 RRLR 841 (Conn Super Ct 1961)
  • Re Olive Braden  (533.Conn.c), 533.43; VII, 26,57; MCLL
  • Blue v Renaud  533.Conn.1; XI,102; MCLL
  • Govan v Rotkiewicz  533.Conn.2; XI,102
  • Dittmar v Thibeault  533.Conn.3; XI,102
  • Vaught v Village Creek Homeowner's Assn  (533.Conn.4), 533.48; VII,57—IX,27; 7 RRLR 849 (Fairfield Co Conn Super Ct 1962)
  • Conn Commn on Civil Rights v Eastlake Estates  533.Conn.5; XII,74—XIII,164
  • Connecticut v Marychuk  533.Conn.6; XIII,164
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • District of Columbia v McLean Gardens  (533.DC.1), 533.42; VII,26,121
  • District of Columbia v Ruark  533.DC.2; X,161
  • Filippo v Real Estate Commn of DC  533.DC.3; XIII,164; aff'd 223 A2d 268 (DC Ct of App 1966)
GEORGIA
  • Cooger v Atlanta  (533.Ga.1), 533.62; VIII,144
  • Johnson v Wall Bros Realty  533.Ga.3; XIV,154
  • Brown v State Realty Co (DeKalb Co)  533.Ga.4; XIV,154; 304 FSupp 1236 (ND Ga 1969)
ILLINOIS
  • Progress Development Corp v Mitchell  (533.Ill.1), 533.20; V,41—IX,65; 182 FSupp 681 (ND Ill 1960), 286 F2d 222 (CA 7 1961); 219 FSupp 156 (ND Ill 1963)
  • Deerfield Park Dist v Progress Development Corp  (533.Ill.la), 533.20a; VI,124—IX,65; 6 RRLR 487 (Ill Sup Ct 1961), 186 NE2d 360 (Ill Sup Ct 1962), cd 372 US 968 (1963); ACLU
  • Stevenson and Kent v Gen'l Fed'l Svgs and Loan Assn Harris Trust and Savings Bank  (533.Ill.2), 533.41; VII,26—IX,65
  • Illinois Terra Realty and Bldg v Flanagan, Bldg Commr  (533.Ill.3), 533.60; VIII,144—XI,50; MCLL
  • Washington v Village of Broadview, Illinois  (533.Ill.4), 533.84; X,126; MCLL
  • Hanover Equities v Tenants Action Council  533.Ill.5; XIII,164
  • Contract Buyers League v F and F Investment  533.Ill.6; XIV,154; 300 FSupp 210 (ND Ill 1969); MCLL
LOUISIANA
  • US v La Kratt Corp  533.La.1; XIV,154; MCLL
  • US v Knippers and Day Real Estate (Baton Rouge)  533.La.2; XIV,154; 298 FSupp 551 (ED La 1969); MCLL
MARYLAND
  • Hackley, Jr v Art Builders, Hartford Co Metropolitan Comm  (533.Md.a), 533.28; V,96; 179 FSupp 851 (DC Md 1960)
  • Barnes v Sind  533.Md.1; X,161—XI,102; 223 FSupp 572 (DC Md 1963), 341 F2d 676 (CA 4 1965), 347 F2d 324 (CA 4 1965), cd 382 US 891 (1965); MCLL
  • US v Owens (Ann Arundel Co)  533.Md.2; XIV,154; MCLL
  • US v Mintzes (Baltimore)  533.Md.3; XIV,154; 304 FSupp 1305 (DC Md 1969)
  • Spencer v Stefanowicz and Sons  533.Md.4; XIV,155; 1 RRLS 227 (DC Md 1969)
  • In the Matter of Lingo (Montgomery Co)  533.Md.5; XIV,155; MCLL
  • Montgomery Citizens League v Greenhalgh  533.Md.6; XIV,155; 252 A2d 242 (Md Ct of App 1969)
MASSACHUSETTS
  • Marshall v Middlesex Homes & Campanelli Builders  (533.Mass.1), 533.21; V,65,96; MCLL
  • Colangelo v Massachusetts Comm Against Discrimination  (533.Mass.2), 533.33; VI,73—VIII,115; 182 NE2d 595 (Mass Sup Ct 1962)
  • Pina v Homsi  533.Mass.3; XIV,155; 1 RRLS 183 (DC Mass 1969)
  • Harris v Jones  533.Mass.4; XIV,155; 296 FSupp 1082 (DC Mass 1969)
MICHIGAN
  • McKibbin v Michigan Corp & Sec Comm'n  (533.Mich.1), 533.31; VI,73—IX,117; 7 RRLR 851 (Ingham Co Cir Ct 1962), 119 NW2d 557 (Mich Sup Ct 1963); MCLL; ACLU
  • Ann Arbor v Hubble  (533.Mich.2), 533.83; X,74,126; MCLL
  • Bryant (Comp) v Cutler-Hubble Co  533.Mich.2a; XI,51; MCLL
  • Galloway (Comp) v Cutler-Hubble Co  533.Mich.2b; XI,51
  • Gray and Jones (Comps) v Cutler-Hubble Co  533.Mich.2c; XI,51
  • Smith v Claucherty  533.Mich.3; XI,51—XIV,155; MCLL
  • Beech Grove Inv Co v Michigan Civil Rights Commn  533.Mich.4; XI,51; MCLL
  • McClinic v Gordon Williamson Co (Mich Civ Rts Commn)  533.Mich.5; XII,74—XIII,164; MCLL
  • Roy v Mavant Homes  533.Mich.6; XII,74—XIV,155
  • Rosen v Mich Civil Rights Commn  533.Mich.7; XIII,165—XIV,155; 157 NW2d 213 (Mich Sup Ct 1968)
  • Windnagle v Grand and Harcourt  533.Mich.8; XIV,155
MINNESOTA
  • Re Orfield (Minneapolis)  533.Minn.1; XIV,155; 1 RRLS 129 (Minn Dept of Human Rights 1969)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Potts v Nat'l Development and Construction Co  533.Miss.1; XIV,156
  • Lee v Southern Homesites Corp  533.Miss.2; XIV,156; 1 RRLS 131 (SD Miss 1969)
  • In the Matter of Port Gibson Annexation  533.Miss.3; XIV,156
MISSOURI
  • Creve Coeur v Dielman  (533.Mo.1), 533.6; V,41—VI,72
  • Missouri ex rel Creve Coeur v Hon Noah Weinstein  (533.Mo.1a), 533.6a; V,96; 329 SW2d 399 (Mo Ct of App 1959)
  • Venable v Creve Coeur  (533.Mo.2), 532.6; II,63—III,18
NEW JERSEY
  • New Jersey Home Builders Assn v Div of Civil Rights  (533.NJ.1), 533.70; IX,28—XI,51; 195 A2d 318 (NJ Super Ct 1963)
  • David v Vesta  533.NJ.2, 533.71; IX,28—XI,51; 196 A2d 286 (County Ct Law Div 1963), 212 A2d 345 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • Conover v Packanack Lake Country Club and Community Assn  533.NJ.3; X,161—XIII,165; 94 NJ Super 275 (NJ Super Ct App Div 1967); MCLL
  • Gardner v Dorann Manor Apts, Carriage House Apts  533.NJ.4; XI,51; 11 RRLR 1598 (Dept of Law & Pub Safety, Div on Civil Rights 1965)
  • Grillo v Plainfield Area Bd of Realtors  533.NJ.5; XI,102; MCLL
  • Dinkins v Mercer Co Bd of Realtors  533.NJ.6; XI,102; MCLL
  • Summer v Teaneck  533.NJ.7; XIV,156; 251 A2d 761 (NJ Sup Ct 1969)
  • Jackson v Concord  533.NJ.8; XIV,156; 253 A2d 793 (NJ Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
  • Sixty-six Melmore Gardens v Wilson  533.NJ.9; XIV,156; 254 A2d 545 (NJ Super Ct App Div 1969)
  • Robinson v Branch Brook Manor Apts  533.NJ.10; XIV,156; 243 A2d 284 (NJ Super Ct App Div 1968)
  • Brown, Reid v Gramercy Gardens (Plainfield)  533.NJ.11; XIV,156; 1 RRLS 79 (NJ Div of Civil Rights 1969)
  • Rutgers University and Lewis v Henn  533.NJ.12; XIV,156
NEW YORK
  • Re Pritchard  (533.NY.1), 532.4; II,47
  • Martin v NYC Commission on Intergroup Relations  (533.NY.2), 532.17, 533.17; IV,84—V,65; 201 NYS2d 111 (NY Co Sup Ct 1960)
  • New York City v Fried  (533.NY.3), 533.34; VI,73
  • Ruiz v Bertolotti  (533.NY.4), 533.49; VII,57—X,73; 236 NYS2d 854 (NY Sup Ct 1962); MCLL
  • Redd v Rye Wood Gardens  (533.NY.5), 533.52; VII,94
  • Redd v Rye Colony  (533.NY.5a), 533.52a; VII,94
  • Redd v Rye Colony, State Comm for Human Rights  (533.NY.5b), 533.52b; VII,94,121; 229 NYS2d 582 (Westchester Co Sup Ct 1962)
  • Bolden v Perlstein  (533.NY.6), 533.61; VIII,144—IX,117; 9 RRLR 417 (NY Comm for Human Rights 1964); MCLL
  • New York v Claflington  (533.NY.7), 533.67; IX,28; 243 NYS2d 437 (NY Sup Ct 1963)
  • Cooney v Katzen  (533.NY.8), 533.68; IX,28,117
  • Bachrach v 1001 Tenants Corp  (533.NY.9), 533.77; IX,66,117; 245 NYS2d 912 (NY Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 249 NYS2d 855 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1964)
  • New York City Comm on Human Rights v 1001 Tenants Corp  (533.NY.9a), 533.77a; IX,117—XI,51
  • State Comm on Human Rights v Eshoo  (533.NY.10), 533.78; IX,117; 8 RRLR 1576 (NY Sup Ct 1963), 8 RRLR 1717 (NY Comm for Human Rights 1963)
  • Morton v Koda, Lefkowitz v Koda  (533.NY.11), 533.80; IX,118; MCLL
  • Beaman v Principe: Lefkowitz v Principe  (533.NY.12), 533.81; IX,118; MCLL
  • Kindt v NY Comm for Human Rights  533.NY.13; X,161—XI,51; 254 NYS2d 933 (Sup Ct 1964), 258 NYS2d 250 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1965), 212 NE2d 898 (NY Ct of App 1965)
  • Marrano Const Co v Commn for Human Rights  533.NY.14; XI,51; 259 NYS2d 4 (Sup Ct 1965)
  • River House v Booth  533.NY.15; XI,102—XIII,165; 273 NYS2d 291 (Sup Ct 1966)
  • New York Commission for Human Rights v Bronx Landlord  533.NY.16; XI,102
  • Greenthal v Commission on Human Rights  533.NY.17; XIII,165; vac 274 NYS2d 846 (NY Sup Ct 1966)
  • Hartfield St Commission for Human Rights v Swinsick  533.NY.18; XIII,165; 12 RRLR 524 (NY Commn for Human Rights 1967)
  • Harper v Lawrence Gardens  533.NY.19; XIII,165; 12 RRLR 520 (NY Commn for Human Rights and NY Sup Ct 1966)
  • Henderson v Wurman (Brooklyn)  533.NY.20; XIII,165; 281 NYS2d 198 (NY Sup Ct 1967)
  • Berback v Mangum  533.NY.21; XIV,156; 297 NYS2d 853 (NY Sup Ct 1969)
  • Miller v Zaccaro  533.NY.22; XIV,156
  • Re Harjeff Realty (Yonkers)  533.NY.23; XIV,156; 1 RRLS 79 (NY State Div of Human Rights 1969)
  • In the Matter of Metropolitan Life Insurance  533.NY.24; XIV,156
  • Taylor v Castagna  533.NY.25; XIV,157
OHIO
  • Krumpek v Bd of Revision of Summit County, Ohio  (533.Ohio.1), 640.2; I,29
  • Helper Bros Bldg Co v Haffner  (533.Ohio.2), 533.57; VIII,54—IX,65
  • Mason v Grenell  (533.Ohio.3), 533.57; VIII,54—IX,65
  • Terry v Toledo  (533.Ohio.5), 533.72; IX,28—X,161; 194 NE2d 877 (Ohio Ct of App 1963), 205 NE2d 376 (Ohio Sup Ct 1965)
  • Porter v Oberlin  (533.Ohio.6), 533.76; IX,66—X,126; MCLL
  • Newbern v Lake Lorelei  533.Ohio.7; XIV,157; 1 RRLS 185 (SD Ohio 1969)
  • Bush v Kaim  533.Ohio.8; XIV,157; 297 FSupp 151 (ND Ohio 1969)
OREGON
  • Smith v Curt Craft  (533.Ore.1), 533.32; VI,73—X,72; 5 RRLR 1272 (Ore Comm of Lab 1960)
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Russell v Banks  (533.Pa.1), 533.64; IX,28
  • Stanton Land Co v Pittsburgh and Nickens  (533.Pa.2), 533.69; IX,28,117
  • Philadelphia v Price  533.Pa.3; XI,51—XII,74; 10 RRLR 796 (Ct of Common Pleas 1965), 215 A2d 661 (Pa Sup Ct 1966)
  • Collins and Frisby v McKay  533.Pa.4; XI,51; 11 RRLR 1600 (Human Relations Comm 1964); MCLL
  • Miller v Radnor Valley Bldrs, Kelley Bldrs  533.Pa.5; XI,51; 11 RRLR 1607 (Human Relations Commn 1965); MCLL
  • Blair v Marsh Realty  533.Pa.6; XI,51; MCLL
  • Ellerson v Polis  533.Pa.7; XI,51; MCLL
  • Re Huber  533.Pa.8; XI,51—XII,74; MCLL
  • Riley v Dick's Automotive Co  533.Pa.9; XI,51; 11 RRLR 564 (Penn Human Relations Commn 1965)
  • Re Altman, Dolgenos, Feinberg  533.Pa.10; XII,74; MCLL
  • Re Starner  533.Pa.11; XII,74; MCLL
  • Hill v Altman, Dolgenos, Feinberg  533.Pa.12; XIII,165
  • Cates v Taylor, Fulmer, Glendel Construction Co (Glenolden)  533.Pa.13; XIII,165
  • Harrell v Ryan Homes, Eardley, Electra Realty Co, Dininni (Dauphin Co)  533.Pa.14; XIII,165; MCLL
  • Satchell v Sarnocinski  533.Pa.15; XIV,157
  • Complaint of Stancil v Spano (Springfield)  533.Pa.16; XIV,157; MCLL
  • Complaint of Floyd v Lieb (Uniontown)  533.Pa.17; XIV,157; MCLL
  • Harris v Marhoefer Realty (Harrisburg)  533.Pa.18; XIV,157; MCLL
RHODE ISLAND
  • Buff v Ferri  533.RI.1; XIV,157; 259 A2d 847 (RI Sup Ct 1969); MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • US v Columbia YMCA  533.SC.1; XIV,157
TENNESSEE
  • Truhart v Gold Realty Co (Memphis)  533.Tenn.1; XIV,157
TEXAS
  • Walker v Pointer  533.Tex.1; XIV,157; 304 FSupp 56 (ND Tex 1969)
VIRGINIA
  • Federal Trade Commn v Reinsch  533.Va.1; XIV,158; MCLL
  • Federal Trade Commn v First Buckingham Community Inc  533.Va.2; XIV,158; MCLL
WASHINGTON
  • Curtiss, Washington State Bd Against Discrimination v Interlake Realty  (533.Wash.1), 533.55; VIII,54—X,125
WISCONSIN
  • Brown v Lo Ducca  533.Wisc.1; XIV,158; 1 RRLS 265 (ED Wisc 1969)
534. Omnibus Suits To End Housing Segregation (and 575)
  • Dorsey v Stuyvesant Town Corp  (534.a); NLG
  • Polier v O'Dwyer  (534.b); MCLL; NLG
  • Ming v Horgan  (534.c), 532.2; II,27—IV,62; 3 RRLR 693 (Calif Super Ct 1958); MCLL
  • Cotillion Club v Detroit Real Estate Bd  534.1; VII,57—X,126; MCLL
  • Bratcher v Akron Real Estate Bd  534.2; X,126—XIII,165; 11 RRLR 405 (ND Ohio 1965), rev'd & rem 381 F2d 723 (CA 6 1967)
535. Miscellaneous Housing Suits, Referenda on Legislation (and 423, 575)
  • Anderson v Auseth  (535.a); MCLL
  • Kemp v Rubin and Richardson  (535.b); MCLL
  • McGhee v Sipes  (535.c); 334 US 1 (1948); MCLL; ACLU; NLG
  • Urciolo v Hodge  (535.d); MCLL; NLG
  • Hurd v Hodge  (535.e); 334 US 24 (1948); NLG
  • Shelley v Kraemer  (535.f); 334 US 1 (1948); MCLL; NLG
  • S End Fedl Svgs & Loan v Roan, Braden and Wade  (535.g), 532.1; II,27,81; ACLU
  • Beddoe v Southeast Realty Bd  (535.h), 532.3; II,27—III,62
  • Smith v Clark  (535.i), 532.5; II,47
  • Robinson v Mansfield  (535.j), 532.7; II,81
  • Stratton v Conway  (535.k), 532.9; III,42; 301 SW2d 332 (Tenn Sup Ct 1957)
  • Carmichael v Christenson and Village of Maywood  (535.L), 532.10; III,42—IV,63
  • Seckinger v Atlanta  (535.m), 532.11; III,62; 100 SE2d 192 (Ga Sup Ct 1957)
  • Capitol Fedl Svgs & Loan Assn v Smith  (535.n), 532.12; III,63,86; aff'd 316 P2d 252 (Colo Sup Ct 1957); MCLL
  • Bolton v Crane  (535.o), 533.15; III,63—V,41
  • McGregor v Florida Real Estate Comm  (535.p), 532.16; IV,35—V,41; 99 S2d 709 (Fla Sup Ct 1958)
  • Harris v Sunset Islands Property Owners  (535.q), 532.20; IV,109; 116 S2d 622 (Fla Sup Ct 1959)
  • Re Anthony Visconti  (535.r), 533.24; V,96
  • Wiley v Richland Water Dist  (535.s), 533.25; V,96—VII,25; 5 RRLR 788 (WD Ky 1960)
  • Bernstein v Real Estate Comm of Maryland  (535.t), 533.27; V,96—VI,73; 156 A2d 657 (Md Sup Ct 1959), app dism'd 363 US 419 (1960)
  • Harrison v Tucker  (535.u), 533.44; VII,26; 342 SW2d 383 (Tex Cir Ct of App 1961)
  • Gast v Gorek  (535.v), 533.45; VII,26; 211 NYS2d 112 (Suffolk Co Sup Ct 1961)
  • Abstract Investment Co v Hutchison  535.1; VII,121; 22 CR 309 (DCA Calif 1962)
  • Lewis v Jordan (California)  535.2; IX,66,118; MCLL
  • Turner v Ledbetter  535.3; IX,118
  • Greater Detroit Homeowners Council v Michigan Civil Rights Comm  535.3a; X,74; 9 RRLR 893 (Mich Sup Ct 1964); MCLL
  • Pls v Greater Detroit Home Owner's Council  535.3b; X,126
  • NAACP v Detroit  535.3c; XII,74; MCLL
  • Greater Detroit Homeowners Council v Wayne Circuit Judge Moynihan  535.3d; XIII,166; 9 RRLR 893 (Wayne Co Cir Ct 1964)
  • Crowell v Isaacs  535.4; IX,118—XII,74; 235 CA2d 755 (DCA 1965); MCLL
  • Anderson v Forest Park  535.5; XI,52; 239 FSupp 576 (WD Okla 1965); MCLL
  • Montgomery v San Jose, Garden of Eden Apts  535.7; XI,102; MCLL
  • Chicago Real Estate Bd v Chicago  535.8; XI,102—XIII,166; 11 RRLR 386 (Cook Co Cir Ct 1965), aff'd 224 NE2d 793 (Sup Ct 1967)
  • Blume v Baltimore Bd of Estimates  535.9; XI,103
  • Elsea v Watts  535.10; XII,75; 11 RRLR 392 (Wayne Co Cir Ct 1965)
  • Rhodes v Various Trailer Parks  535.11; XII,75—XIII,166
  • NAACP v Norwalk (Stamford)  535.13; XIII,166
  • Jones v Alfred H Mayer Co  535.14; XIII,166—XIV,158; 379 F2d 33 (CA 8), rev'd 392 US 409 (1968); MCLL
  • CORE v Norwalk Redevelopment Agency  535.15; XIII,166
  • Chiaino v Lomenzo  535.17; XIII,166; 275 NYS2d 658 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1966)
  • Diona v Lomenzo  535.18; XIII,166; aff'd 275 NYS2d 663 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1966)
  • Birch and Ragone v Lomenzo  535.19; XIV,158; 298 NYS2d 281 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1969)
  • Chapman v Watson  535.20; XIV,158; 240 NE2d 604 (Ill Sup Ct 1968)
535.100. REFERENDA ON ANTI-FAIR HOUSING ACT
  • Flint NAACP v Flint  535.102; XIV,158
  • Otey v Common Council (Milwaukee)  535.103; XIV,158; 281 FSupp 264 (ED Wisc 1968)
  • Holmes v Leadbetter  535.104; XIV,158; 294 FSupp 991 (ED Mich 1968)
  • Hunter v Erickson (Akron)  535.105; XIV,159; 233 NE2d 129 (Ohio Sup Ct), rev'd 393 US 385 (1969)
  • Ranjel v Lansing  535.106; XIV,159; 293 FSupp 301 (WD Mich 1969), 417 F2d 321 (CA 6 1969)
540. TRANSPORTATION-RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
541. In Interstate Facilities (and 51, 54, 55, 58)
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
  • Keys v Carolina Bus Co  (541.ICC.1), 670.3; I,30,49
  • NAACP v St Louis, San Francisco Ry Co  (541.ICC.2), 670.4; I,30,49
  • Re Interstate Commerce Commission Regulations  (541.ICC.3), 541.36; VII,28—VIII,55
ALABAMA
  • Alabama ex rel Gallion v CORE  (541.Ala.a), 541.24
  • Baldwin v Morgan  541.Ala.1, 541.2; II,81—X,126; 251 F2d 780 (CA 5 1958), 287 F2d 750 (CA 5 1961)
  • Gadsden v F and P Shuttlesworth  (541.Ala.2), 541.14; V,97—VI,44
  • P Shuttlesworth v Southeastern Greyhound Lines  (541.Ala.3), 541.14a; VI,44—VII,58
  • Complaint re Connelly Field  (541.Ala.4), 541.15; VI,44
  • Rev Shuttlesworth v Dobbs Houses  541.Ala.5, 541.16; VI,44—VIII,55; 7 RRLR 835 (SD Ala 1962)
  • Ala v Zweig  541.Ala.6, 541.20; VI,125—VIII,55
  • US v Birmingham Police Dept, KKK  (541.Ala.7), 541.21; VI,125
  • Montgomery v Gach  (541.Ala.8), 541.25; VI,125—VII,121
  • Alabama v Abernathy  541.Ala.9, 541.25a; VII,27—X,126; 155 So2d 586 (Ala App Ct 1962), rev'd 380 US 447 (1965)
  • Lewis v Southeastern Greyhound Lines  (541.Ala.10), 541.25b; VII,27,121; 199 FSupp 210 (MD Ala 1961)
  • US v Klans, Knights of Ku Klux Klan (Montgomery)  (541.Ala.11), 541.26; VI,125—VII,28; 194 FSupp 897 (MD Ala 1961)
  • US v Montgomery, Bd of Commrs, Ranch Enterprises  541.Ala.12, 541.35; VII,28—X,75; 201 FSupp 590 (MD Ala 1962)
  • Ala v Sizemore, Greyhound Restaurant Mgr (Birmingham)  541.Ala.13, 541.44; VII,60—VIII,55
  • US v Birmingham Officials  541.Ala.14, 541.44a; VII,60—VIII,55
CALIFORNIA
  • Spears v Transcontinental Bus System  (541.Calif.1), 670.7; I,86; 226 F2d 94 (CA 9 1955)
  • Bangsal and Anderson v Harrah's Club, Greyhound Bus Lines  541.Calif.2, 541.30; VI,126—VIII,56
  • Anderson v Harrah's Club  (541.Calif.2a), 541.31; VI,126
  • Thomas v Nevada Club  541.Calif.3; VIII,56—IX,118
FLORIDA
  • Bullock v Tamiami Trail Tours Bus Line  (541.Fla.1), 541.5; IV,110—V,65; 266 F2d 326 (CA 5 1959)
  • Dresner v Tallahassee  541.Fla.2, 541.27; VI,125—X,75; 164 So2d 208 (Fla Sup Ct 1964), dism'd 378 US 539 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Smith, Callender v Florida (Ocala)  541.Fla.3, 541.28; VI,125—XI,103; 151 So2d 80 (Fla Sup Ct), 380 US 519 (1965); 181 So2d 529 (Fla Sup Ct 1966), 383 US 270 (1966)
  • Lamb v Hillsborough Co Aviation Auth  541.Fla.4, 541.32; VII,28—X,161
  • Brooks v Tallahassee  (541.Fla.5), 541.33; VII,28,121; 202 FSupp 56 (ND Fla 1961)
GEORGIA
  • Coke v Atlanta  (541.Ga.1), 541.7; V,42; 5 RRLR 138 (ND Ga 1960)
  • Georgia v Defs (Atlanta)  541.Ga.2, 541.17; VI,44—VIII,56
  • Georgia v Rev Moss (Atlanta)  541.Ga.3, 541.19; VI,125—VIII,56
  • US v Hamlin  (541.Ga.4), 541.29; VI,126
  • Georgia v Defs (Atlanta)  541.Ga.5, 541.45; VII,60—VIII,56
  • Georgia v US  541.Ga.6, 541.45a; VII,60—VIII,87; 201 FSupp 813 (ND Ga 1961), dism'd app 371 US 9 (1962)
  • Rev Alexander v Bibb Transit Co and Chief of Police McCallum (Macon)  (541.Ga.7), 541.48; VII,96
ILLINOIS
  • Wright v C B & Q RR, Vanderbilt Better Tours  541.Ill.1; VIII,115—X,126; 223 FSupp 660 (ND Ill 1963)
LOUISIANA
  • Adams v New Orleans  541.La.1, 541.13; V,97—IX,119; 208 FSupp 427 (ED La 1962), 321 F2d 493 (CA 5 1964); MCLL
  • US v New Orleans, Aviation Bd and Interstate Hosts  541.La.2, 541.34; VII,28—IX,67
  • Pharis v Continental Southern Trailways Terminal  (541.La.3), 541.37; VII,59
  • US v Lassiter  541.La.4, 541.37a, 541.38; VII,59—VIII,87; 7 RRLR 233 (WD La 1962), 203 FSupp 20 (WD La 1962), aff'd 371 US 104 (1962)
  • Louisiana v Walmsley, Trailways Station Mgr  541.La.5; 541.39; VII,59—VIII,56
  • US v Shreveport  541.La.6, 541.39a; VII,59—IX,28
  • Taylor v Louisiana (Shreveport)  (541.La.7), 541.47; VII,96,122; 370 US 154 (1962)
  • Louisiana ex rel Pitcher v Greyhound Corp and Continental Southern Lines (Baton Rouge)  (541.La.8), 541.49; VII,122; 7 RRLR 223 (ED La 1962)
  • US v Pitcher  (541.La.9), 541.49a; VII,122; 7 RRLR 223 (ED La 1962)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Thomas v Mississippi  541.Miss.1, 541.22; VI,125—XI,52; 6 RRLR 544 (Jackson Muni Ct 1961), 160 So2d 657 (Miss Sup Ct 1964), 161 So2d 159, 521 (Miss Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 380 US 524 (1965)
  • Davidov v Mississippi  541.Miss.la; IX,67—XI,52; 161 So2d 161 (Miss Sup Ct 1964)
  • Thomas v Mississippi  541.Miss.lb; IX,67,119; 160 So2d 657 (Miss Sup Ct 1964)
  • Farmer v Mississippi  541.Miss.lc; IX,67,119; 161 So2d 159 (Miss Sup Ct 1964)
  • Bassford v Mississippi  541.Miss.ld; XI,103; 178 So2d 688 (Miss Sup Ct 1965)
  • Mississippi v Wahlstrom "Freedom Riders" (Jackson)  (541.Miss.2), 541.22a; VII,27,58
  • Application of Wyckoff  (541.Miss.3), 541.22b; VII,27,58; 196 FSupp 515 (SD Miss 1961)
  • Mississippi v Frieze, Carey, Luster  541.Miss.4, 541.22c; VII,27—VIII,57
  • Mississippi v Rev Morris  541.Miss.5, 541.22d; VII,27—VIII,57
  • Bailey v Patterson  541.Miss.6, 541.23; VI,125—X,76; 368 US 346 (1962); 369 US 31 (1962); 323 F2d 201 (CA 5 1963),cd 376 US 910 (1964)
  • US v Fraiser  541.Miss.7, 541.40; VII,59—VIII,57; 6 RRLR 1167 (ND Miss 1961)
  • Mississippi v Moses (McComb)  541.Miss.8, 541.41; VII,59—XI,103; 179 So2d 9 (Miss Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • US v Mayor and Selection of McComb  541.Miss.9, 541.41a; VII,59—VIII,57; 6 RRLR 1169 (SD Miss 1961)
  • CORE v Douglas  541.Miss.10, 541.41b; VII,60—IX,29; 318 F2d 95 (CA 5 1963), cd 375 US 829 (1963)
  • Mississippi v Stayton  (541.Miss.11), 541.41c; VII,60
  • Mississippi v Divens (McComb)  (541.Miss.12), 541.41d; VII,60
  • Mississippi v Rev Chas Jones, Taylor & G Jackson  541.Miss.13, 541.42; VII,60—VIII,57
  • US v Jackson, Mississippi  541.Miss.14, 541.42a; VII,60—IX,67; 206 FSupp 45 (SD Miss 1962), 318 F2d 1 (CA 5 1963)
  • Mississippi v Bell  541.Miss.15, 541.42b; VII,60—VIII,57
  • US v Oxford City Officials  541.Miss.16, 541.43; VII,60—VIII,57
  • Mississippi v Nelson, Thompson and Smith  541.Miss.17; 541.46; VII,60—VIII,57
NEW YORK
  • Fitzgerald v Pan American World Airways  (541.NY.1), 541.1; II,27,47; 229 F2d 499 (CA 2 1956)
  • Watson v Eastern Air Lines  (541.NY.2), 541.3; III,63—V,96
  • Ephraim v Safeway Trails  541.NY.3; IX,119
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Henry v Greenville Municipal Airport  (541.SC.1), 541.4; IV,110—VII,121; 191 FSupp 146 (WD SC 1961)
TENNESSEE
  • Nashville v Defendants  (541.Tenn.1), 541.9; V,65
  • Turner v Memphis  (541.Tenn.2), 541.11; V,97—VII,121; 369 US 350 (1962)
VIRGINIA
  • Boynton v Virginia  (541.Va.1), 541.8; V,42—VII,58; 364 US 454 (1960)
  • Thornton v Trailways Bus Co (Petersburg)  (541.Va.2), 541.12; V,97
  • Henderson v Trailways Bus Co;  Robinson v Hunter, (541.Va.2a), 541.Va.3, 541.12a; VI,73—VIII,145; 6 RRLR 467 (ED Va 1961); MCLL
  • Williams v Howard Johnson's Restaurant  541.Va.3, 551.Va.3; III,64—V,65; 268 F2d 845 (CA 4 1959)
542. In Intrastate Facilities (and 51, 54, 55, 58)
  • Tallahassee v Jakes and Patterson  (542.a), 670.10; I,105
  • Montgomery v Parks  542.1; II,27,63
  • Gayle v Browder  542.2; II,27,63; 142 FSupp 707 (MD Ala 1956), aff'd 352 US 903 (1956)
  • Browder v Montgomery  542.2a; II,47; 146 FSupp 127 (MD Ala 1956)
  • Flemming v South Carolina Electric & Gas Co  542.3; II,27—III,86; 224 F2d 752 (CA 4 1955)
  • Evers v Dwyer  542.4; II,28—VIII,87; 358 US 202 (1958)
  • Miami v Reid  542.5; II,28,63
  • Garmon v Miami Transit Co  542.5a; II,48—IV,35; 151 FSupp 953 (SD Fla 1957), 253 F2d 428 (CA 5 1958)
  • Virginia v Ritter (Richmond)  542.6; II,28
  • Inter-Civic Council of Tallahassee v Tallahassee  542.7; II,48—III,18
  • Speed v Tallahassee  542.7a; III,63; 3 RRLR 37 (Fla Cir Ct 1958), cd 356 US 913 (1958)
  • Florida v Rev Steele  542.7b; VI,97
  • Georgia v Rev Borders  542.8; II,48
  • Morrison v Davis  542.9; III,42,86; 252 F2d 102 (CA 5 1958), cd 356 US 968 (1958)
  • Simkins v Mayor Gardner (Shreveport)  542.10; III,42—VII,60
  • Montgomery v Rev Pleasure  542.11; III,42—IV,63
  • Shuttlesworth v Birmingham Transit Co  542.12; IV,63
  • Hanes v Shuttlesworth  542.12a; IV,63—IX,67; 130 So2d 236,237 (Ala Sup Ct 1962), cd 368 US 959 (1962); 369 US 35 (1962); 138 So2d 710,712,713 (Ala Sup Ct 1962), 310 F2d 303 (CA 5 1962), 151 So2d 734 (Ala App Ct 1962); MCLL
  • Brown v Gray  542.13; V,97—VII,122; MCLL
  • Christian v Jemison  542.14; V,97—VIII,116; 6 RRLR 522 (ED La 1961), 303 F2d 52 (CA 5 1962), cd 371 US 920 (1962)
  • Boman v Birmingham Transit Co  542.15; V,42—VII,122; 280 F2d 531 (CA 5 1960), 6 RRLR 1171 (ND Ala 1961)
  • Montgomery v Taylor  542.16; VI,44—X,127
  • Petersburg v Defs  542.17; VI,44—VIII,58
  • Walker v Atlanta  542.18; VI,74—VII,28
  • Taylor v Augusta, Augusta Coach Co, Georgia Public Service Comm  542.19; VII,61,122; 7 RRLR 227 (SD Ga 1962)
  • Georgia v Defs (Macon)  542.20; VII,61—VIII, 58
  • Georgia v 5 Defs (Albany)  542.21; VII,61—X,76
  • Georgia v Forman, Lee, Collins (Albany)  542.21a; VII,61—X,76
  • Georgia v 267 Defs (Albany)  542.21b; VII,61—X,76
  • Georgia v Slater King (Albany)  542.21c; VII,61—X,76
  • Georgia v 198 Defs (Albany)  542.21d; VII,61—X,76
  • Georgia v 10 Defs (Albany)  542.21e; VII,61—X,76
  • Georgia v Rev M L King, Rev Abernathy, Anderson  542.21f; VII,61—X,76
550. MISCELLANEOUS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (and 42, 51, 54, 55, 58, 63)
551. In Recreational Facilities
ALABAMA
  • Thomas v Lanier, Bessemer City Bd of Commrs  551.Ala.1; III,42
  • Sawyer v Mobile  (551.Ala.2), 551.Ala.1, 551.Ala.3; IV,97—VII,61; 6 RRLR 484 (SD Ala 1961); MCLL
  • Gilmore v Montgomery  (551.Ala.3), 551.Ala.2; V,42,97; 176 FSupp 776 (MD Ala 1959)
  • Shuttlesworth v Gaylord  551.Ala.4; VII,28,61; 5 RRLR 1142 (ND Ala 1960), 6 RRLR 1101 (ND Ala 1961), 7 RRLR 204 (ND Ala 1962)
  • Robinson v Fairfield  551.Ala.5; XI,52
  • NAACP v Burch (Birmingham)  551.Ala.6; XIV,159
  • Jackson v Kelley  551.Ala.7; XIV,159
ARKANSAS
  • Freeman v Little Rock  551.Ark.1; VIII,116,145; 8 RRLR 173 (ED Ark 1963)
  • Daniel, Kyles v Paul  (551.Ark.2), 552.Ark.6; XII,76—XIV,162; 263 FSupp 412 (ED Ark 1967), aff'd 395 F2d 118 (CA 8 1968), rev'd 395 US 298 (1969)
  • Kyles v Culberson  (551.Ark.2a), 553.Ark.3, 553.Ark.2; XII,76—XIII,171; 263 FSupp 412 (ED Ark 1967)
CALIFORNIA
  • McClain, by guardian ad litem v South Pasadena  551.Calif.1; II,28—III,43; 318 P2d 199 (Calif Ct of App 1957)
  • Manley v Barber Shop  551.Calif.2; II,82
  • Peoples v Club Primadonna  551.Calif.3; III,43—VI,74; 5 RRLR 1164 (San Francisco Super Ct 1960)
  • Teverbaugh v El Rey Trailer Parks  551.Calif.4; III,43—IV,63; MCLL
  • Santa Clara Voiture 365 v American Legion 40&8 Society  551.Calif.5; IV,36—VIII,118; MCLL
  • California v Harris  551.Calif.6; IV,110—V,97; 5 CR 852 (Calif Super Ct App Dept 1960)
  • Moore v Thomasson, Police Chief  551.Calif.7; V,65—VIII,116
  • Beatty v Barrel Club  551.Calif.8; VII,28
  • Lowe v Given and Donaldson d/b/a Park Lane Hotel  551.Calif.9; VII,29—IX,68
  • Morton v Bellucci & Los Altos Hills Country Club  551.Calif.10; XI,103; MCLL
  • Burt v Bonita Golf Club  (551.Calif.11), 551.Calif.10; VII,122
  • Rubin v South Coast Corinthian Yacht Club  (551.Calif.12), 551.Calif.11; XIV,159; MCLL
COLORADO
  • Jernigan v Lakeside Park Co  551.Colo.1; III,63,86; 314 P2d 693 (Colo Sup Ct 1957)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • District of Columbia v John R Thompson Co  (551.DC.1); 346 US 100 (1953); ACLU
  • Central Amusement Co v District of Columbia  (551.DC.2), 660.1; I,29,104; 121 A2d 865 (DC Muni Ct of App 1956)
  • Mitchell v Boys Club of Metropolitan Police  (551.DC.3), 551.DC.1; III,63,86; 157 FSupp 101 (DC DC 1957)
FLORIDA
  • Petersburg v Alsup  551.Fla.1; II,82
  • Moorhead v Fort Lauderdale  551.Fla.2; II,82—IV,63; 248 F2d 544 (CA 5 1957)
  • Ward v Miami  551.Fla.3; III,18—V,97; 151 FSupp 593 (SD Fla 1957), aff'd 252 F2d 787 (CA 5 1958)
  • Pls v Jacksonville  551.Fla.4a; VI,74
  • Ghioto v Hampton  551.Fla.4b; IV,63—VIII,116; 304 F2d 320 (CA 5 1962), cd 371 US 911 (1962)
  • Bohler v Lane, Mayor of Tampa  551.Fla.5; V,97—VIII,116; 204 FSupp 168 (SD Fla 1962)
  • Wimbish v Pinellas Co  551.Fla.6; IX,119—X,161; 342 F2d 804 (CA 5 1965)
  • NAACP v Florida Bd of Parks  551.Fla.7; X,76
  • Edwards v Fort Myers  551.Fla.8; XI,52—XII,75; 11 RRLR 385 (MD Fla 1965)
  • Dukes v Madison Co  551.Fla.9; XI,52; 10 RRLR 1274 (MD Fla 1964)
  • Twitty v Vogue Theatre Co  551.Fla.10; XI,52; 242 FSupp 281 (MD Fla 1965); MCLL
  • US v Schaffer d/b/a Star-Lite Drive-In Theater  551.Fla.11; XIII,167
  • US v Skidmore d/b/a Pirates Cove Fish Camp  551.Fla.12; XIV,159
GEORGIA
  • Holmes v Atlanta  (551.Ga.1), 660.9; I,30,65; 124 FSupp 290 (DC DC), 223 F2d 93 (CA 5), vac & rem 350 US 879 (1955)
  • Williams v Maclean (Savannah)  551.Ga.3; V,97—VII,29
  • King v Mayor Hartsfield, Judge Webb  551.Ga.5; VII,29—VIII,116
  • Brown v Atlanta  551.Ga.6; VIII,59,116
  • Patterson v MacLean (Savannah)  551.Ga.8; VIII,116—X,76; 9 RRLR 879 (SD Ga 1964)
  • Law v Jekyll Island State Park Auth  551.Ga.9; IX,29—X,76
  • Evans v Newton  551.Ga.10; IX,68—XII,75; 9 RRLR 309 (Ga Super Ct 1964), 138 SE2d 573 (Ga Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 382 US 296 (1965)
  • Ewing v City Council (Augusta)  551.Ga.11; X,76,161
  • Shields v Midtown Bowling Lanes  551.Ga.12; X,161; MCLL
  • Wesley v Savannah  551.Ga.13; XIV,159; 294 FSupp 698 (SD Ga 1969)
INDIANA
  • Stewart v Hartke  551.Ind.1; II,28
KENTUCKY
  • Moorman v Morgan  (551.Ky.a), 660.17; I,65; 285 SW2d 146 (Ky Ct of App 1955)
  • M Switow and Sons Enterprises v Lexington Chap, CORE  551.Ky.1; VII,29—IX,29
  • Walker v Richmond Bd of Educ  551.Ky.2; VIII,59—X,76
  • Re Graydon (Bromley)  551.Ky.3; XIV,159
LOUISIANA
  • Detiege v New Orleans City Park Improvement Assn  (551.La.a), 551.La.1; III,43—IV,110; 252 F2d 122 (CA 5 1958), aff'd 358 US 54 (1958)
  • US v Page Amusement Co  (551.La.b), 551.La.2; XI,103—XIII,167
  • Miller v Amusement Enterprises  551.La.1; XI,103—XIV,160; 259 FSupp 523 (ED La 1966), aff'd 391 F2d 86 (CA 5 1967)
  • La State Athletic Comm v Dorsey  551.La.2; IV,63,110; 168 FSupp 149 (ED La 1958), aff'd 359 US 533 (1959)
  • McCain v Davis (New Orleans)  551.La.3; VIII,87—IX,68; 217 FSupp 661 (ED La 1963)
  • Schiro v Bynum  551.La.4; IX,29,119; 219 FSupp 204 (ED La 1963) (3 jdg ct), aff'd 375 US 395 (1964)
  • Barthe v New Orleans  551.La.5; IX,68,119; 219 FSupp 788 (ED La 1963) (3 jdg ct), aff'd 376 US 189 (1964)
  • Lagarda v Recreation & Park Comm (E Baton Rouge Parish)  551.La.6; X,76
  • Gilmore v LaCoste  551.La.7; XI,52
  • Rax v Louisiana Tourist Development Commn  551.La.8; XI,52
  • Rax v Pineville  551.La.9; XI,52—XIII,167
  • US v Lucky Strike Bowling Lanes, Gruber, Vosbein, Dudash (New Orleans)  551.La.10; XIII,167
  • Adams v Fazzio Real Estate  551.La.11; XIV,160; 396 F2d 146 (CA 5 1968)
MARYLAND
  • Dawson v Mayor and City Council of Baltimore; Lonesome v Maxwell and Commrs of Forests & Parks of Maryland  (551.Md.1), 660.2; I,29,48; aff'd 350 US 877 (1955)
  • Statom v Bd of City Commrs (Prince George's Co)  551.Md.2; VIII,145—XII,75; 195 A2d 41 (Md App Ct 1963)
  • Williams v Rescue Fire Co  551.Md.3; XI,103—XIII,167; 254 FSupp 556 (DC Md 1966); MCLL; ACLU
  • US v Milford Swimming Club (Baltimore Co)  551.Md.4; XIV,160; 1 RRLS 191 (DC Md 1969)
  • Tilman v Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn  551.Md.5; XIV,160
  • US v Beach Associates Inc  551.Md.6; XIV,160; 286 FSupp 801 (DC Md 1968)
MICHIGAN
  • LaFond v Detroit  (551.Mich.a); 98 NW2d 530 (Mich Sup Ct 1959)
  • Bishop v Hotels Statler Co  551.Mich.1; III,18—IV,36; MCLL
  • Scruggs v Borgman  551.Mich.3; IV,110
  • Re Papa Ibra Tall  551.Mich.4; V,98
  • Oak Park v Detroit Brotherhood Youth Council, CORE  551.Mich.6; VII,29
  • Pontiac Community Bowling League v Orchard Lanes Bowling Alley  551.Mich.7; X,127; MCLL
  • Kalish v Bloomfield Beach and Boat Facility (Oakland Co)  551.Mich.8; XIII,167
  • Pearson v Mount Clemens City Commn  551.Mich.9; XIII,167
MISSISSIPPI
  • US v Harrison Co  551.Miss.2; V,66—XIV,160; 265 FSupp 76 (SD Miss), rev'd 399 F2d 485 (CA 5 1968)
  • Mason v Biloxi  551.Miss.2a; XII,75—XIII,167; aff'd 184 So2d 113 (Miss Sup Ct 1966)
  • Clark v Thompson  551.Miss.4; VII,123—X,127
  • Sherrod v Coker's Cafe  551.Miss.5; XI,52
  • Sherrod v Pink Hat Cafe  551.Miss.6; XI,52—XIII,167; 250 FSupp 516 (ND Miss 1965)
  • Taylor v Vasselus  551.Miss.7; XI,52
  • Wilder v Ferrell  551.Miss.8; XI,53
  • Bolton, Bynum v Greenville  551.Miss.9; XI,103; 128 So2d 667,672 (Miss Sup Ct 1965)
  • US v Laurel  551.Miss.10; XI,103—XIII,167
  • US v Fokokis d/b/a Coney Island Restaurant (Hattiesburg)  551.Miss.11; XIII,167—XIV,160
  • Palmer v Thompson (Jackson)  551.Miss.13; XIV,160; 391 F2d 324 (CA 5 1967), 419 F2d 1222 (CA 5), 1 RRLS 225 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
MISSOURI
  • Streckful Steamers v St Louis  551.Mo.1; VII,29,97
NEBRASKA
  • Nebraska v Peony Park  (551.Neb.1), 660.12; I,49,65
NEW JERSEY
  • Sun & Splash Club v New Jersey Division Against Discrimination  551.NJ.1; IV,63
  • Fraser v Robin Dee Day Camp  551.NJ.2; X,162—XI,53; 210 A2d 208 (NJ Sup Ct 1965)
  • Wade v New Jersey Blind Men's Assn  551.NJ.3; XIII,167
  • Butler v Ramblewood Country Club (Mt Laurel)  551.NJ.4; XIV,160; MCLL
NEW YORK
  • Castle Hill Beach Club v Arbury  (551.NY.a), 551.NY.3, 660.6; I,30—III,18; 150 NYS2d 367 (NY App Div 1956)
  • Frankle v Union News Co  551.NY.1; II,82
  • Re Green Witch Club  551.NY.2; III,18,87
  • Lake Placid Club v Abrams, State Comm Against Discrimination  551.NY.3; III,64—IV,85; 179 NYS2d 487 (NY App Div 1958)
  • New York State Comm Against Discrimination v Mid City Swimming Pool and Finn  551.NY.4; III,87—V,42
  • Carter v Canton Valley Restaurant  551.NY.5; IV,110—VI,48
  • Trowbridge d/b/a Trowbridge Farm v Katzen, SCAD  551.NY.6; V,66—VII,62; 218 NYS2d 808 (NY App Div 1961)
  • Dozier v Plaza Hotel  551.NY.7; V,98
  • Re Am Legion Post  551.NY.8; XII,75
  • Re Camp Lakota  551.NY.9; XIV,160
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Charlotte Park & Recreation Comm v Barringer  (551.NC.a), 660.7; I,30,104; 88 SE2d 114 (NC Sup Ct 1955), cd 350 US 983 (1956)
  • Wolfe v North Carolina  551.NC.1; II,28—VI,97; 364 US 177 (1960)
  • Tonkins v Greensboro  551.NC.3; IV,64—VII,123; 276 F2d 890 (CA 4 1960)
  • Edwards v Abercrombie Enterprises  551.NC.4; VIII,117—IX,30
  • North Carolina v Cobb  551.NC.5; X,77; 136 SE2d 674 (NC Sup Ct 1964)
  • US v Walter B Jones d/b/a Skylight Inn (Ayden)  551.NC.6; XIII,167
  • US v Reynolds Memorial Park  551.NC.7; XIV, 160; MCLL
  • US v Sadler  551.NC.8; XIV,161
OHIO
  • Fletcher v Coney Island  (551.Ohio.1), 660.3; I,29,104; 136 NE2d 344 (Ohio Sup Ct 1956)
OKLAHOMA
  • Owens v Doe Amusement Park (Lawton)  551.Okla.1; XIII,168—XIV,161
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Brackeen v Ruhlman  551.Pa.1; III,64
  • Sullivan v Schultheis d/b/a Warden Motel  551.Pa.2; IV,36; MCLL
  • Pennsylvania v Gibney d/b/a Senape Park  551.Pa.3; V,66; 5 RRLR 475 (Chester Co Ct of Common Pleas 1959)
  • Beverly v Great Leopard Skating Rink  551.Pa.4; VII,123
  • Lackey v Sacoolas  551.Pa.5; IX,30; 191 A2d 395 (Pa Sup Ct 1963)
  • Vaughns v Lemont Furnace  551.Pa.6; X,127; MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Clark v Flory  551.SC.1; II,28—V,42; aff'd dismissal 237 F2d 597 (CA 4 1956)
  • Cummings v Charleston  551.SC.1a; IV,110—VII,62; 288 F2d 817 (CA 4 1961)
  • Brown v South Carolina State Forestry Comm  551.SC.4; VII,29—X,127; 226 FSupp 646 (ED SC 1963)
  • Walker v Shaw  551.SC.5; VIII,60—X,77; 209 FSupp 569 (WD SC 1962)
  • James v Carnegie Public Library  551.SC.6; IX,68—X,127; 235 FSupp 911 (ED SC 1964)
  • US v All Star Triangle Bowl  551.SC.7; XIV,161; 283 FSupp 300 (DC SC 1968)
TENNESSEE
  • Hayes v Crutcher  551.Tenn.1; II,28,82; 137 FSupp 853 (MD Tenn 1956)
  • Turner v Randolph (Memphis)  551.Tenn.3a; V,98—VI,74
  • Flowers v Loeb  551.Tenn.5; V,98—VII,123
  • Watson v Memphis  551.Tenn.6; V,98—VIII, 146; 303 F2d 863 (CA 6 1962), rev'd 373 US 526 (1963)
  • US v All Weather Roller Drome  551.Tenn.7; XIV,161; 1 RRLS 190 (MD Tenn 1969)
TEXAS
  • Byars v White, Mayor of San Antonio  (551.Tex.a), 660.5; I,30
  • Harvey v Morgan  (551.Tex.b), 660.10; I,30; 272 SW2d 621 (Tex Ct Civ App 1954)
  • Fayson v Beard, Mayor of Beaumont, Texas  (551.Tex.c), 660.16; 134 FSupp 379 (ED Tex 1955)
  • Ware and Williams v Statler Hilton Hotel  551.Tex.1; V,18—VI,126
  • Willie v Harris Co, Texas  551.Tex.2; V,98—VII,123; 202 FSupp 549 (SD Tex 1962)
  • Huff and Upton v Victoria  551.Tex.3; VII,30,123
  • Allen, Grant v Club Bolero  551.Tex.5; X,77; MCLL
  • US v Thunderbird Roller Rink (Richardson)  551.Tex.6; XIV,161; MCLL
  • US v Sandy Lake Pool Inc  551.Tex.7; XIV,161; MCLL
  • Beltran v Patterson  551.Tex.8; XIV,161
VIRGINIA
  • Mott v Lake Fairfax  (551.Va.a), 551.Va.10; XI,53; 10 RRLR 1289 (ED Va 1965)
  • Tate v Dept of Conservation & Development  551.Va.1; II,28—III,18; 231 F2d 615 (CA 4 1956)
  • Holley v Portsmouth  551.Va.2; III,18; 150 FSupp 6 (ED Va 1957)
  • Reid v Norfolk  551.Va.6; V,98; 179 FSupp 768 (ED Va 1960)
  • Brown v Richmond  551.Va.9; VIII,60—IX,120; 132 SE2d 495 (Va Sup Ct of App 1963)
  • Blackwell v Harrison  551.Va.10; IX,30; 8 RRLR 635 (ED Va 1963)
  • Scott v Young (Oakton)  551.Va.11; XIII,168—XIV,161; 12 RRLR 428 (ED Va 1966)
  • Sullivan v Little Hunting Park  551.Va.12; XIV,161; rev'd & rem 392 US 657 (1967); 163 SE2d 588 (Va Sup Ct of App 1968), 396 US 229 (1969)
  • Jackson v Circle Lanes  (551.Va.13), 553.Va.7; XII,77—XIII,172
WASHINGTON
  • Re Beacon Hill Men's & Women's Golf Clubs  551.Wash.1; V,18
WEST VIRGINIA
  • Lark v Harrison d/b/a Green Acres Motel  551.WVa.1; IV,36—V,18
  • Thomas v G C Murphy Co  551.WVa.2; IV,85
552. In Dining Places (and 51, 54, 55, 58)
ALABAMA
  • Katzenbach v McClung  552.Ala.12; X,77,162; 379 US 294 (1964)
  • US v The Warren Co  552.Ala.13; XI,53; 10 RRLR 1293 (SD Ala 1965)
  • Rodgers v Gardner  552.Ala.14; XI,53; 10 RRLR 1290 (ND Ala 1965)
  • US v Lake View Dining Club  551.Ala.15; XI,53—XII,75
  • US v Chitwood  552.Ala.16; XI,104—XII,75
  • Mitchell v The Krystal Co  552.Ala.17; XI,104
  • Rogers v Katros  552.Ala.17a; XI,104
  • Langford v Middlebrooks  552.Ala.18; XI,104—XIV,161
  • LeShore v Carter  552.Ala.18a; XII,75—XIV,161
  • Davis v Hill  552.Ala.19; XII,76; 11 RRLR 425 (SD Ala 1966)
  • US v Tacker d/b/a The Coffee Pot  552.Ala.20; XIII,168; 12 RRLR 1515 (MD Ala 1967)
  • Wilcoxon v Tastee Freez, Drive In Development Corporation  552.Ala.21; XIII,168; 11 RRLR 1996 (MD Ala 1966)
  • Goodwill v Fletcher's Bar-B-Que  552.Ala.22; XIII,168—XIV,161
  • Lawson v Tito's Restaurant  552.Ala.23; XIII,168
  • LeFlore v Butler's Chick-Teria  552.Ala.24; XIII,168
  • Goodwill v Presto Restaurant  552.Ala.25; XIII,168
  • Goode v Johnny's Drive-In Restaurant  552.Ala.26; XIII,168—XIV,162
  • Goode v Acme Cafe  552.Ala.27; XIII,168—XIV,162
  • Johnson v Larry's Restaurant  552.Ala.28; XIII,168—XIV,162
  • Hughes v Falcut  552.Ala.29; XIII,168; 12 RRLR 2139 (ND Ala 1967)
  • Epps v Krystal Company  552.Ala.30; XIII,168—XIV,162
  • Rich v Kennedy d/b/a Bek's Frostop  552.Ala.31; XIV,162
  • US v Prestwood d/b/a Pea River Truck Stop (Coffee Co)  552.Ala.32; XIV,162; 1 RRLS 190 (MD Ala 1969)
ARIZONA
  • Twitty v Blakeman  552.Ariz.1; X,127
ARKANSAS
  • Sutton v Capitol Club  552.Ark.3; XI,53
  • Bates v Whitcomb's Cafe; Cone v Whitcomb  552.Ark.4; XI,104—XIII,168
  • Cone v Blasingame  552.Ark.5; XI,104—XIII,168
CALIFORNIA
  • Lambert v Mandel's of California  (552.Calif.1), 552.Calif.2; III,43
  • Sweet v Leon  552.Calif.2; V,99; 5 RRLR 472 (Santa Clara Co Sup Ct 1959)
COLORADO
  • Odom v Berin d/b/a Steak Bar  (552.Colo.1), 660.11; I,30,104
DELAWARE
  • Burton v Wilmington Parking Auth  552.Dela.1; IV,84—VIII,61; 365 US 715 (1961)
  • Mitchell v Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm  552.Dela.2; IX,30; 193 A2d 294 (Dela Super Ct 1963)
FLORIDA
  • Webb's City v NAACP  552.Fla.6; VI,127—VII,123; 6 RRLR 1095 (Fla Cir Ct 1961), 152 So2d 179 (DCA Fla 1963), 376 US 190 (1964); MCLL
  • Lance v Plummer  552.Fla.7; X,78—XII,76; 9 RRLR 1399 (MD Fla 1964), 353 F2d 585 (CA 5 1965), cd 384 US 929 (1966); MCLL
  • Franklin v Ferrell; Pride v Roberts (Madison Co)  552.Fla.8; X,127
  • Parris v Woodward  552.Fla.9; X,127
  • Williams v Connell; Boldan v Allen  552.Fla.10; X,127; 9 RRLR 1427 (MD Fla 1964)
  • Boudshaw v Whigam  552.Fla.11; XI,104; MCLL
  • Oliver v Big D Club; Lacey v 4 B's Club; Lacey v Elliot's Club  552.Fla.12; XI,104—XIII,168
GEORGIA
  • Andrews v Lindsay  552.Ga.6; V,100—VII,62
  • Gibson v Okarma  552.Ga.7; V,100—VI,75; 5 RRLR 1133 (ND Ga 1960)
  • Douglas v Lee  552.Ga.8; V,100—VI,47; 5 RRLR 1130 (ND Ga 1960)
  • Willis v Pickrick  552.Ga.16; X,78,127; 234 FSupp 179 (ND Ga 1964), 9 RRLR 912 (1964), 10 RRLR 353 (ND Ga 1965)
  • Jones v Rishers  552.Ga.17; X,78
  • Sorrells v Bolton  552.Ga.18; X,78,162; 10 RRLR 348 (MD Ga 1965)
  • US v Bush (Dublin)  552.Ga.19; X,162—XIII,169
  • Bates v Bonner Private Club  552.Ga.20; XI,104—XIII,169
  • US v Kent d/b/a Kent's Drive-In  552.Ga.21; XIII,169; MCLL
ILLINOIS
  • Illinois v Kavadas  (552.Ill.1), 660.22; I,105
KANSAS
  • Jackson v Dearmore  552.Kan.1; X,162
  • Matter of Jake Brown's Barbecue Club  552.Kan.2; X,162
LOUISIANA
  • Castle v Davis  552.La.6; X,78
  • Robertson v Johnson  552.La.7; XI,53; MCLL
  • Burris v Redwood Cafe  552.La.8; XI,53
  • US v Jorden  552.La.9; XI,104; MCLL
  • Dupre v Young's Service Station and Lounge  552.La.10; XI,104—XIII,169; 12 RRLR 993 (WD La 1967)
  • Frank v J W Lows  552.La.11; XI,104
  • Gailes v Stelly's Restaurant  552.La.11a; XI,104
  • Norton v The Ranch  552.La.11b; XI,104
  • Bryant v Seven Flags Restaurant and Truck Center  552.La.11c; XI,104
  • Bryant v The Hut  552.La.11d; XI,104
  • Bryant v Cardinal Inn  552.La.11e; XI,104
  • Bryant v Pap's Motel & Restaurant  552.La.11f; XI,104
  • Bryant v Black Angus Restaurant  552.La.12; XI,104—XIII,169
  • Rax v Piper d/b/a Royal Cafe and North Circle Cafe  552.La.13; XIII,169; 12 RRLR 1015 (WD La 1967)
  • Mock v Leni's Cafe, Inc (New Orleans)  552.La.14; XIII,169
  • US v Cantrell d/b/a Cantrell's Bar (Plaquemines Parish)  552.La.15; XIV,162
  • US v Jordan (Bogalusa)  552.La.16; XIV,162; 302 FSupp 370 (ED La 1969)
MARYLAND
  • Slack v Atlantic White Tower System  552.Md.1; V,100— VI,98; 284 F2d 746 (CA 4 1960)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Greenville v Perkins, Lofton  552.Miss.2; XI,53
  • US v Ray  552.Miss.3; XI,53—XIII,169
  • US v Richberg  552.Miss.4; XI,105—XIV,162; 398 F2d 523 (CA 5 1968)
  • NAACP v Primos  552.Miss.5; XI,105—XIII,169; MCLL
  • US v Gus Stevens  552.Miss.6; XII,76—XIII,169
  • US v Taylor, Phillips, Simmons  552.Miss.7; XII,76—XIII,169
  • US v Fortenberry, Garner, Williams  552.Miss.7a; XII,76—XIII,169
  • US v Spencer, Portera, Johnson  552.Miss.7b; XII,76—XIII,169; MCLL
  • US v Jefcoat (Laurel)  552.Miss.8; XIII,169
NEW JERSEY
  • Evans v Ross  552.NJ.1; V,100; 150 A2d 512 (Co Ct NJ 1959), 157 A2d 362 (NJ Sup Ct 1959)
NEW YORK
  • Adickes v SH Kress Co  552.NY.2; X,162—XIV,162; 252 FSupp 140 (SD NY 1966), aff'd 409 F2d 121 (CA 2 1968); MCLL
  • Moses, Hughes, Sims v Ruschmeyer  552.NY.3; XIII,169
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Bowers v Ocean Way Restaurant  552.NC.12; XI,105
  • Coachman v Ivy Lounge  552.NC.13; XI,105—XIV,162
  • Braxton v W C Jennette  552.NC.14; XI,105—XIII,170
  • US v Wansley, Miller  552.NC.15; XII,76—XIII,170
  • Wooten & US (Intervenor) v Moore d/b/a Moore's Barbeque  552.NC.16; XII,76—XIV,162; 42 FRD 236 (ED NC 1967), 400 F2d 239 (CA 4 1968), cd 393 US 1083 (1969)
  • Hardie v Forrest  552.NC.17; XII,76
  • Felton v Burgess  552.NC.18; XII,76—XIII,170; 12 RRLR 1021 (ED NC 1966)
  • US v Bradshaw (Faison)  552.NC.19; XIII,170; 12 RRLR 1022 (ED NC 1967); MCLL
  • US v Dennis d/b/a Bum's Restaurant  552.NC.20; XIII,170; 12 RRLR 1024 (ED NC 1967)
  • US v Elliot d/b/a Elliot's Cafe (Hertford)  552.NC.21; XIII,170
  • US v Worrells  552.NC.22; XIII,170; MCLL
NORTH DAKOTA
  • North Dakota v Brandt  552.ND.1; VII,31
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Surgest v Russo and Mayor Panek  552.Pa.1; VIII,62
  • Lawrence v Coltare  552.Pa.2; XI,53—XIII,170; MCLL
  • Felton v Bematro  552.Pa.3; XI,53—XIII,170; MCLL
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Rev J W Mungin v Stokos  552.SC.12; IX,31
  • US ex rel Lipsitz v Perez  552.SC.13; X,162—XIII,170; 260 FSupp 435 (DC SC 1966), aff'd 372 F2d 468 (CA 4 1967), cd 389 US 838 (1967)
  • US v Causey, Edwards, White  552.SC.14; XII,76—XIII,170
  • Newman v Piggie Park Enterprises  552.SC.15; XIV,163; 256 FSupp 941 (DC SC 1966), 377 F2d 433 (CA 4), aff'd 390 US 400 (1968)
TENNESSEE
  • US v Butler  552.Tenn.9; XI,53; 10 RRLR 1295 (MD Tenn 1965)
TEXAS
  • Plummer v Casey  552.Tex.1; II,48,64; 240 F2d 922 (CA 5 1956), app den 353 US 924 (1957)
  • US v Gramer d/b/a Tall Pine Inn  552.Tex.2; XIV,163; 418 F2d 692 (CA 5 1969)
VIRGINIA
  • Williams v Lewis; Williams v Howard Johnson's, Hot Shoppes  552.Va.12; VI,127—X,162; 293 F2d 835 (CA DC 1961), cd 370 US 925 (1962); 342 F2d 727 (CA 4 1965); MCLL
  • Pls v Vonetes  552.Va.13; X,128
  • Mills v Mears  552.Va.14; XI,105
  • US v Moorefield  552.Va.15; XII,76—XIII,170; 11 RRLR 2008 (WD Va 1966)
  • US v Worsham  552.Va.16; XII,76—XIII,170
  • US v McKoy (Marshall)  552.Va.17; XIII,170; 12 RRLR 1030 (ED Va 1967)
  • US v Poe (Galax)  552.Va.18; XIII,170; 12 RRLR 1033 (WD Va 1967)
  • US v Lumpkin d/b/a Lee's Restaurant (Scottsville)  552.Va.19; XIV,163; MCLL
WASHINGTON
  • Holifield v Paputchis  (552.Wash.1), 660.14; I,65
553. In Other Facilities (and 42)
ALABAMA
  • Bevel v Mallory  553.Ala.2; XII,76
  • Hill v Bowlo-Mac; Hill v Eastwood Bowl; Robinson v Ensley Bowling Lanes  553.Ala.3; XII,76—XIV,163
  • Geison v Clark  553.Ala.5; XIII,171
  • Carr v Ketona County Homes  553.Ala.6; XIII,171
  • Stout and Bibb v Bessemer YMCA  553.Ala.7; XIV,163; 404 F2d 687 (CA 5 1968)
  • Alexander v Birmingham YMCA  553.Ala.8; XIV, 163; 1 RRLS 87 (ND Ala 1969)
  • Brown v Anniston YMCA  553.Ala.9; XIV,163
ARKANSAS
  • Jewell v Little Rock YMCA  553.Ark.1; XI,105
  • Robinson v Humble Oil Co  553.Ark.4; XII,76
CALIFORNIA
  • Coleman, Guardian v Dr Middlestaff  (553.Calif.a), 552.Calif.1; II,63; 305 P2d 1020 (Super Ct Los Angeles 1957)
  • Neville v Peralta Steam Baths  553.Calif.1; VIII,147
  • Cobbs v Rockridge Woman's Club  553.Calif.2; IX,121—X,79; MCLL
  • Baker v Bristol Agency  553.Calif.3; XI,105
  • Lee v Hunter  553.Calif.4; XI,105
  • Butler v Coach Royal Mobile Home Park  553.Calif.5; XIV,163; MCLL
  • Hines v Taggin'Wagon  553.Calif.6; XIV,163
COLORADO
  • Sigma Chi Fraternity v Regents of U of Colorado  553.Colo.1; XIII,171; 258 FSupp 515 (DC Colo 1966)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Davis v Brownell  (553.DC.1), 680.2; I,31
FLORIDA
  • Due v Tallahassee Theaters, City Officials  553.Fla.1; X,79,128; 9 RRLR 904 (CA 5 1964)
  • Jackson v City Commrs, Jacksonville  553.Fla.2; X,80—XII,76; 11 RRLR 1436 (MD Fla 1966)
  • Pinkney v Meloy  553.Fla.3; XI,53; 241 FSupp 943 (ND Fla 1965); MCLL
  • Dean v Ashling  553.Fla.4; XIV,163; 409 F2d 754 (CA 5 1969)
GEORGIA
  • Seniors v Hon Luke Arnold (Atlanta)  (553.Ga.a), 553.Ga.1, 551.Ga.2; V,101—VI,49; 5 RRLR 1136 (CA 5 1960)
  • Henderson v Grady Hotel Corp  553.Ga.1; IX,31—X,128
  • Heart of Atlanta Motel v US  553.Ga.2; X,80,162; 379 US 241 (1964); MCLL
  • Georgia v Wells  553.Ga.3; X,128
ILLINOIS
  • Santiago v Roberts, d/b/a Tiny Tap Tavern  (553.Ill.1), 552.Ill.1; II,28
  • Illinois v Rehm  553.Ill.2; X,128—XI,53
IOWA
  • Rice v Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery  (553.Ia.1), 680.1; I,30; 60 NW2d 110 (Sup Ct Iowa), 349 US 70 (1955)
KENTUCKY
  • Triplett v Kentucky Human Rights Commn (Louisville)  553.Ky.1; XIV,163; 1 RRLS 93 (Jefferson Co Cir Ct 1968)
LOUISIANA
  • US v Happy Hosts, Inc  553.La.1; XI,105—XIII,171; 11 RRLR 1503 (ED La 1966)
  • Bryant v Guillory  553.La.2; XII,77; 11 RRLR 426 (WD La 1965)
  • Pania v New Orleans  553.La.5; IX,120—XIII,171; 262 FSupp 651 (ED La 1967)
  • Cameron Parish Police Jury v Hickel; Gottschalk v Cameron Parish Bd of Educ  553.La.8; XIV,163; 302 FSupp 689 (WD La 1969)
MICHIGAN
  • Michigan v Smith  (553.Mich.a), 660.19; I,85
  • Russau v Restlawn Memorial Park Corp  553.Mich.1, 552.Mich.1; II,64—V,68
  • Spenser v Flint Memorial Park  553.Mich.3; X,128—XII,76; 9 RRLR 1393 (Mich Cir Ct 1964), 144 NW2d 622 (Ct of App Mich 1966); MCLL
  • Monley v Irons (Oakland Co)  553.Mich.4; XIII,171
  • Re Pacific Finance Corp (Ann Arbor)  553.Mich.5; XIII,171
MINNESOTA
  • Erickson v Sunset Memorial Park Assn  553.Minn.1, 552.Minn.1; IV,36—VI,127; 108 NW2d 434 (Minn Sup Ct 1961); MCLL; ACLU
MISSISSIPPI
  • COFO v State Fair Comm  553.Miss.3; X,80—XI,54; 9 RRLR 1390 (SD Miss 1964)
  • In Matter of WLBT, WJTV  553.Miss.4; X,162
  • Allen v Robbins (Edwards)  553.Miss.5; XIII,171; 12 RRLR 35 (SD Miss 1966)
  • US v Bd of Trustees Evans Memorial Library (Aberdeen)  553.Miss.8; XIII,171
NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • New Hampshire v Sprague  553.NH.1; X,80; 200 A2d 206 (Sup Ct NH 1964)
NEW JERSEY
  • Sellers v Philip's Barber Shop  553.NJ.1; XI,105—XII,77; 217 A2d 121 (NJ Sup Ct 1966)
  • Triolo v State Bd of Barber Examiners (Madison)  553.NJ.1a; XII,77; MCLL
  • Re Conley (Bordentown)  553.NJ.3; XIII,171
NEW YORK
  • Patterson v Max Beauty Salon  553.NY.1; VI,49—VIII,63
  • New York State Comm Against Discrimination v Mustachio  553.NY.2; VII,31; 6 RRLR 355 (NY SCAD 1961)
  • Lowery v Dupuy, sub nom NY v Dupuy  (553.NY.3), 660.13; I,49,65
  • Hobson v York Studios  (553.NY.4), 660.20; I,85; 145 NYS2d 162 (Manhattan Muni Ct 1955)
  • Collins v Graff (Riverhead)  553.NY.5; XIII,172
  • Grey v New York Dept of Social Services  553.NY.6; XIV,164; 305 FSupp 435 (SD NY 1969)
  • Re Hudson Terrace Cabana Club  553.NY.7; XIV,164
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Hawkins v Charlotte YMCA  553.NC.1; X,128—XII,77; 11 RRLR 424 (WD NC 1965)
  • Nesmith v Raleigh YMCA  553.NC.2; XI,105—XIV,164; 273 FSupp 502 (ED NC 1967), rev'd & rem 397 F2d 96 (CA 4 1968)
  • Little v Sedgefield Inn  553.NC.3; XI,105—XII,77; 11 RRLR 1495 (MD NC 1966)
  • Polk v Charlotte Park and Recreation Commn  553.NC.4; XII,77
  • Standbacks v Arrowhead  553.NC.5; XII,77
  • McCoy v Dismukes t/a Coffee Cup Restaurant  553.NC.6; XII,77
  • Leonard v Peek  553.NC.7; XII,77
  • Ballard v Nobles d/b/a Lumberton Dairy Center  553.NC.9; XIV,164
OHIO
  • Gegner v Graham (Yellow Springs)  553.Ohio.1; IX,69—X,128; 205 NE2d 72 (Ohio Sup Ct 1965); MCLL; ACLU
  • Ohio v Gegner (Yellow Springs)  (553.Ohio.1a), 553.Ohio.1; VII,63
OREGON
  • James v Barr  553.Ore.1; VIII,118,147
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Johnson v Cafaro  553.Pa.1; VIII,147—X,80; MCLL
  • Buefort v Elias  553.Pa.2; XI,54; MCLL
  • Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm v Whitemarsh Memorial Cemeteries  553.Pa.3; XI,105—XII,77; MCLL
  • Mutyambezi v Hess (Oxford)  553.Pa.4; XIII,172; 12 RRLR 1717 (Chester Co Com Pleas Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Potts v Fox (Williamsport)  553.Pa.5; XIII,172
  • Re Loyal Order of Moose (Harrisburg)  553.Pa.8; XIV,164
RHODE ISLAND
  • US v Grays Motel (North Kingston)  553.RI.1; XIV,164
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Thomas v Orangeburg Theaters  553.SC.1; X,80—XI,54; 241 FSupp 317 (ED SC 1965); MCLL
TENNESSEE
  • Turner v Randolph (Memphis)  (553.Tenn.1), 551.Tenn.3a; V,98—VI,74; 195 FSupp 677 (WD Tenn 1961)
  • Ford v Morris, Sheriff (Shelby Co)  553.Tenn.2; X,129,162; 356 SW2d 726 (Tenn Sup Ct 1962)
UTAH
  • Cuevas v Sdrales  553.Utah.1; X,129—XII,77; 344 F2d 1019 (CA 10 1965), cd 382 US 1014 (1965); MCLL
VIRGINIA
  • Virginia v Bissell  (553.Va.1), 552.Va.1; II,48—IV,36; ACLU
  • Virginia v Taylor  (553.Va.2), 552.Va.2; III,43
  • Dawley v Norfolk  (553.Va.3), 552.Va.3; IV,37,110; 260 F2d 647 (CA 4 1958), cd 359 US 935 (1959)
  • Dixon v Duncan  553.Va.5; IX,31; 218 FSupp 157 (ED Va 1963)
  • Pls v YMCA, Norfolk Branch  553.Va.6; X,129
WASHINGTON
  • Browning v Slenderella Systems of Seattle  (553.Wash.a), 552.Wash.1; III,18
  • In re Johnson, Wheeler and Washington State Bd Against Discrim (Spokane Co)  553.Wash.1; IX,69—XI,54; 10 RRLR 841 (Wash Super Ct, Spokane 1965); MCLL
  • Price v Evergreen Cemetery Co of Seattle  553.Wash.2; VII,31; 357 P2d 702 (Wash Sup Ct 1960)
WEST VIRGINIA
  • Hawkins v Sunset Memorial Park  553.WVa.1; XIV,164; 1 RRLS 85 (Kanawha Co Cir Ct 1968)
  • Allen v Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens  553.WVa.2; XIV,164
WISCONSIN
  • Pitts and D'Attilio v Eagles and Elks  553.Wisc.1; XIV,164; MCLL
554. In Hospitals (and 575)
ALABAMA
  • Rodgers v Druid City Hospital  554.Ala.1; XI,54; 10 RRLR 1273 (ND Ala 1965)
  • Stout v Hospital Building Auth  554.Ala.2; XII,77—XIII,172
  • Foster v Mobile Co Hospital Bd  554.Ala.3; XIII,172; 12 RRLR 423 (SD Ala 1966), rev'd & rem 398 F2d 227 (CA 4 1968)
  • Foster v Mobile Co Hospital Bd  554.Ala.4; XIV,164; 398 F2d 227 (CA 5 1968)
  • Marable v Alabama Mental Health Bd; Alabama ex rel Gallion v Finch  554.Ala.5; XIV,164; 297 FSupp 291 (MD Ala 1969)
ARKANSAS
  • Boyd v Helena Hospital  554.Ark.1; XI,54
  • Burton v Bd of Trs of the Ark Tuberculosis Sanitorium  554.Ark.2; XII,77; 11 RRLR 1933 (ED Ark 1966)
CALIFORNIA
  • Washington v Blampin  554.Calif.1; X,80; 38 CR 235 (Calif DCA 1964)
FLORIDA
  • Hayling v Flagler Hospital (St Augustine)  554.Fla.1; X,80,162; 344 F2d 950 (CA 5 1965); MCLL
  • Jenkins v Suwannee  554.Fla.2; XI,54—XIII,172
  • Lewter v Lee Memorial Hospital  554.Fla.3; XI,54—XIII,172; 11 RRLR 1425 (MD Fla 1965); MCLL
  • Pringle v State Tuberculosis Bd of Florida  554.Fla.4; XI,54—XIII,172; 11 RRLR 1427 (ND Fla 1966)
GEORGIA
  • Bell v Georgia Dental Assn  554.Ga.1; VII,124—XII,77; 231 FSupp 299 (ND Ga 1964), 10 RRLR 337 (ND Ga 1965), 11 RRLR 413 (ND Ga 1966); MCLL
ILLINOIS
  • Dr Morris, Jr v Chicago Hospital Council  554.Ill.1; VI,100—IX,69; MCLL
LOUISIANA
  • Rax v State Dept of Hospitals  554.La.1; XII,77; 11 RRLR 384 (ED La 1966)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Thornton v Washington Co Genl Hospital  554.Miss.1; XII,77—XIII,172
  • US v Marion Co General Hospital  554.Miss.2; XII,78—XIII,172
  • Coleman v Humphreys Co Memorial Hospital  554.Miss.3; XIV,165; MCLL
NEW YORK
  • Dr Campbell v St Peters Hospital  (554.NY.1), 571.32; V,43
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Eaton v Bd of Mgrs of James Walker Memorial Hospital  (554.NC.1), 571.18; III,65—IV,111; 164 FSupp 191 (MD NC 1958), aff'd 261 F2d 521 (CA 4 1958), cd 359 US 984 (1959)
  • Eaton v Grubbs  (554.NC.la), 554.NC.2a; VII,32—XIII,172; 216 FSupp 465 (ED NC 1963), rev'd 329 F2d 710 (CA 4 1964)
  • Simkins, US v Cone Memorial Hospital, Long Community Hospital (Greensboro)  (554.NC.2), 554.NC.1; VII,124—X,81; 323 F2d 959 (CA 4 1963), cd 376 US 938 (1964); MCLL; ACLU
  • Hawkins v North Carolina Dental Society  554.NC.3; V,69—XII,78; 230 FSupp 805 (WD NC 1964), rev'd 355 F2d 718 (CA 4 1966); MCLL
  • Porter v North Carolina Hospitals Bd  554.NC.4; VIII,64—X,81
  • Addison v High Point Hospital  554.NC.6; X,81
  • Clayton v Person Co Hospital  554.NC.7; X,163; 10 RRLR 348 (MD NC 1964)
  • Veasey v Wake Co Hospital System  554.NC.8; XII,78—XIII,172
  • Nesmith v Trs, Rex Hospital  554.NC.9; XII,78—XIII,173
SOUTH CAROLINA
  • Rackley v Bd of Trs, Orangeburg Regional Hospital  554.SC.1; VII,124—XIII,173; 7 RRLR 837 (ED SC 1962), 310 F2d 141 (CA 4 1962); 35 FRD 516 (ED SC 1964), 238 FSupp 512 (ED SC 1965)
  • US v Medical Society of South Carolina (Charleston)  554.SC.2; XIV,165; 298 FSupp 145 (DC SC 1969)
  • US v Orangeburg Regional Hospital  554.SC.3; XIV,165
VIRGINIA
  • Wood v Hogan, Lynchburg Gen Hospital  554.Va.1; VII,124—X,163; 215 FSupp 53 (WD Va 1963); MCLL
  • Cypress v Newport News  554.Va.2; IX,122—XIII,173; 251 FSupp 667 (ED Va 1966), 375 F2d 648 (CA 4 1967)
  • Bridges v Hampton Training School for Nurses  554.Va.3; X,81—XIII,173
  • Smith v Hampton Training School for Nurses  554.Va.3a; X,81—XII,78; 243 FSupp 403 (ED Va 1965), rev'd & rem 360 F2d 577 (CA 4 1966)
555. In Government Facilities
ALABAMA
  • Cobb v Montgomery Library Bd and Bd of Trs, Museum of Fine Arts  555.Ala.1; VII,124; 207 FSupp 880 (MD Ala 1962); MCLL
  • Faulkner v Gadsden  555.Ala.2; VII,124—IX,122; 9 RRLR 876 (ND Ala 1964); MCLL
  • Smith v Birmingham  555.Ala.3; VIII,64—IX,70; 226 FSupp 838 (ND Ala 1963); MCLL
  • Gardner v Kendrick  555.Ala.4; VIII,64—X,129; MCLL
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Jordan v Pres Kennedy  (555.DC.a), 524.1; VI,72—VII,93; MCLL
FLORIDA
  • Kenon v Joanos  555.Fla.1; VIII,65; MCLL
  • Brown v Bryant  555.Fla.2; VIII,88—X,129
LOUISIANA
  • Jelks v Perez  555.La.1; X,82—XIII,173
  • Re Jonesboro Post Office  555.La.2; XI,55
MICHIGAN
  • Dearborn Community Council v Hubbard, Mayor  555.Mich.1; X,129—XI,55; 10 RRLR 450 (Mich Civ Rights Commn 1965), 10 RRLR 1760 (Wayne Co Ct, Mich 1965); MCLL
MISSISSIPPI
  • Clark v Thompson  555.Miss.1; VII,98—X,82; 313 F2d 637 (CA 5 1963); MCLL
  • Robinson v Bd of Supervisors, Madison Co  555.Miss.2; XI,55; 11 RRLR 1423 (SD Miss 1965); MCLL
  • Williams v Mississippi School for Deaf  555.Miss.3; XIII,173—XIV,165; 12 RRLR 1936 (SD Miss 1967)
VIRGINIA
  • Wood, Thaxton v Vaughn (Lynchburg)  555.Va.1; VII,98—X,82; 321 F2d 474, 480 (CA 4 1963); MCLL
  • Dunlap v Councilmen, Danville  555.Va.2; VIII,65—XIII,173; MCLL
556. In Administration of Government (and 425.100, 573)
CALIFORNIA
  • Beasley v Cahill (San Francisco)  556.Calif.1; XIV,165; MCLL
MISSISSIPPI
  • Allen v Mississippi Commn on Law Enforcement  556.Miss.1; XIV,165
  • Hawkins v Shaw  556.Miss.2, 553.Miss.6; XIII,171—XIV,165; 303 FSupp 1162 (ND Miss 1967); MCLL
  • Harris v Itta Bena  556.Miss.3, 553.Miss.7; XIII,171—XIV,165
  • Coleman v Aycock (Humphreys Co)  556.Miss.4; XIV,165; 304 FSupp 132 (ND Miss 1969)
  • Bland v Angelo  556.Miss.5; XIV,165
NORTH CAROLINA
  • Bryant v State Bd of Assessment  556.NC.1, 553.NC.8; XIII,172—XIV,165; 293 FSupp 1379 (ED NC 1968)
557. In Prisons, Reformatories (and 151, 411)
ALABAMA
  • Lee v Washington  557.Ala.1, 553.Ala.4; XII,76—XIV,166; 263 FSupp 327 (MD Ala 1966), aff'd 390 US 333 (1968); MCLL
  • US v Alabama (Montgomery)  (557.Ala.1a), 553.Ala.4a; XIII,171; 263 FSupp 327 (MD Ala 1966), 396 F2d 749 (CA 5 1967), aff'd 390 US 333 (1968)
  • Crum v Alabama State Training School for Girls  557.Ala.2; XIV,166; 413 F2d 1348 (CA 5 1969)
  • Stockton and US v Alabama Industrial School for Negro Children  557.Ala.3; II ACQ 46; MCLL
ARKANSAS
  • George v Bd of Managers of the Arkansas Training School for Boys  (557.Ark.1), 555.Ark.1, 553.Ark.2; XII,76—XIII,173; 12 RRLR 950 (ED Ark 1966), 12 RRLR 1473 (CA 8 1967), cd 389 US 845 (1967)
CALIFORNIA
  • Re San Bruno Prison Riot  (557.Calif.1), 555.Calif.1; XII,78
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  • Edwards v Sard  (557.DC.1), 555.DC.1; XI,106—XII,78; 250 FSupp 977 (DC DC 1966)
FLORIDA
  • Ferguson v Buchanan  (557.Fla.a), 555.Fla.3; XI,54; 10 RRLR 795 (SD Fla 1965)
  • Jackson v Godwin  557.Fla.1; XIV,166; 400 F2d 529 (CA 5 1968)
GEORGIA
  • Wilson v Kelley  557.Ga.1; XIV,166; 294 FSupp 1005 (ND Ga), aff'd 393 US 266 (1968); MCLL
  • Rentfrow v Carter  557.Ga.2; XIV,166; 296 FSupp 301 (ND Ga 1968)
LOUISIANA
  • Reynolds v Orleans Parish Prison  (557.La.a), 553.La.3; XII,77—XIII,171
  • Pound v Theard  557.La.1; XIV,166; MCLL
  • Major v Sowers  557.La.2; XIV,166; 297 FSupp 664 (ED La), 298 FSupp 1039 (ED La 1969)
MISSISSIPPI
  • Montgomery v Oakley Training School  557.Miss.1; XIV,166; 1 RRLS 224 (SD Miss 1969)
PENNSYLVANIA
  • Lawson v Prasse  557.Pa.1; XIV,166; 411 F2d 1203 (CA 3 1969)
  • US ex rel Holland v Maroney  557.Pa.2; XIV,166; 299 FSupp 262 (WD Pa 1969)
VIRGINIA
  • Short v Cavedo  557.Va.1; XIV,167; 1 RRLS 264 (ED Va 1969)
560. FAMILY MATTERS-RACIAL, RELIGIOUS, NATIONALITY PROBLEMS (and 56, 426)
561. In Marriage and Divorce
  • Naim v Naim  (561.a), 695.1; I,31; 87 SE2d 749 (Va Sup Ct 1955), vac 350 US 891 (1955)
  • Oyama and Jordan v Pima Co Clerk  561.1; V,42—VII,124; 5 RRLR 136 (Ariz Super Ct 1959)
  • Carr & Catto v St John's University  561.2; VII,98—VIII,119; 187 NE2d 18 (NY Ct of App 1962); MCLL; ACLU
  • McLaughlin v Florida  561.3; IX,31—XI,55; 153 So2d 1 (Fla Sup Ct 1963), rev'd 379 US 184 (1964); MCLL
  • Medaglia v Gill  561.4; IX,70
  • Collins v Collins  561.5; X,82
  • Loving v Virginia  561.6; X,129—XIII,173; 243 FSupp 231 (ED Va 1965), 147 SE2d 78 (Va Sup Ct of App 1966), rev'd 388 US 1 (1967); MCLL
  • Jones and Marquez v Lorenzen  561.7; X,129—XII,78; 11 RRLR 326 (Okla Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Kober v Kober  561.8; XI,106—XII,78; 211 NE2d 817 (NY Ct of App 1965)
  • Waters v US  561.9; XIII,174; 316 F2d 301 (CA 5 1963)
562. In Adoption Proceedings
  • Goldman v Fogarty  (562.a); 75 SCt 257 (1954)
  • In re Adoption of Minor  (562.b), 690.1; I, 31; 228 F2d 446 (CA DC 1955), 229 F2d 790 (CA DC 1956)
  • Re Adoption Hildy Ellis  (562.c), 690.4; I,31—II,64; 136 NE2d 203 (Mass Sup Ct 1956)
  • In re Petition of Ellis  (562.d), 562.1; II,82
  • Re Mr and Mrs Frederick Miller  562.1; VII,32
  • Re Adoption of Baker  562.3; VIII,65,88; 185 NE2d 51 (Ohio Ct of App 1962); ACLU
  • Re J Rockefeller  562.4; VIII,65—X,82
  • Burke v NJ Bureau of Children's Services  562.5; XII,78—XIV,167
  • Matter of Fitzsimmons v Liuni  562.6; XIII,174; 51 Misc2d 96 (Ulster Co Family Ct 1966); rev'd 26 App Div 2d 980 (NY App Div 1966)
  • Adoption of Richardson  562.7; XIII,174; rev'd 59 CR 323 (Calif DCA 1967)
  • In re Malmstedt  562.8; XIII,174; 220 A2d 147 (Md Ct of App 1966), 385 US 976 (1967)
563. In Custody Proceedings
  • Re Custody of Sidney Branch  (563.1), 690.2; I,31,49
  • Smith v Smith  (563.2), 690.3; I,31; 286 P2d 1009 (Calif DCA 1955)
  • Lynch v Uhlenhopp  (563.c), 563.1; II,28,48; 78 NW2d 491 (Ia Sup Ct 1956)
  • Murphy v Murphy  (563.d), 563.2; II,64; 124 A2d 891 (Conn Sup Ct 1956)
  • Cooper v Henrichs  563.3; II,64; 130 NE2d 678 (Ill App Ct 1955)
  • Ondrejka v Ondrejka  563.5; II,64—III,87; 90 NW2d 615 (Wisc Sup Ct 1958)
  • Fountaine v Fountaine  563.6; II,82
  • Miller v Sisters of St Mary's of Oregon  563.7; III,64,83
  • Begley v Begley  563.8; VI,76—VIII,65, ACLU
  • Potter v Potter  563.9; VIII,65—IX,70; MCLL
  • Cude v Arkansas  563.10; IX,122; 377 SW2d 816 (Ark Sup Ct 1964)
  • Eilers v Eilers  563.11; X,82—XII,78
  • Painter v Bannister  563.12; XI,106—XIII,174; 140 NW2d 152 (Ta Sup Ct 1966), 385 US 949 (1966); MCLL
  • Barnes v Catholic Charities of Joliet  563.13; XII,79; MCLL
  • Halstead v Halstead  563.14; XII,79; 144 NW2d 861 (Sup Ct Ia 1966)
  • Stingley v Wesch  563.15; XIII,174; 222 NE2d 505 (Ill App Ct 1967)
  • Quiner v Quiner  563.16; XIII,174; 251 ACA 383 (Calif DCA 1967)
564. In Miscellaneous Proceedings
  • Maryland v Howard  (564.a), 564.1; II,28,82
  • Louisiana ex rel Heno v Drake  564.1; XI,55; 176 So2d 226 (La Ct of App 1965)
  • State of La ex rel Rodi v City of New Orleans  564.2; III,19; 94 S2d 108 (La Ct of App 1957)
  • Rose v Deasy  564.3; III,19
  • Evans v Young  564.4; III,19; 299 SW2d 218 (Tenn Sup Ct 1957)
  • Louisiana ex rel Dupas v New Orleans  564.5; III,64; 125 S2d 375 (La Sup Ct 1960)
  • Perricone v New Jersey  564.6; VII,98—VIII,119; 181 A2d 751 (NJ Sup Ct 1962), cd 371 US 890 (1962)
  • State ex rel Francis v State Bd of Health  564.7; XII,79; aff'd 179 S2d 681 (CA La 1965)
570. EMPLOYMENT
571. Racial Discrimination Against Teachers (and 24, 522)
  • Gainer v School Bd (Jefferson Co)  (571.a), 615.3; I,84; 135 FSupp 559 (ND Ala 1955)
  • West v Bd of Educ (Prince Georges Co)  (571.b), 571.24; IV,65; 165 FSupp 382 (DC Md 1958)
  • Brooks v Bd of Educ (Moberly)  571.1; II,29—V,19; 267 F2d 733 (CA 8 1959), cd 361 US 894 (1959)
  • Dixon v Barrows (Missouri)  571.2; II,29—III,87
  • Wise v Gasaway (Arkansas)  571.3; II,29—III,64
  • Starling v Bd of Educ (Mingo Co)  571.3a; III,87—V,19
  • Goode v Bd of Educ (Summers Co)  571.3b; IV,37—IX,122; 8 RRLR 1485 (SD WVa 1963)
  • Owens v Sch Dist #36 (Pulaski & Alexander Co)  571.10; 571.58; VII,33—IX,32; MCLL
  • McPherson v Connellsville Jnt Sch Bd, Pa Human Rights Comm  571.11, 571.62; VII,125—X,130
  • US v Greene Co Bd of Educ  571.12; VII,125—X,83; 7 RRLR 770 (SD Miss 1962), 332 F2d 40 (CA 5 1964); MCLL
  • Sylvia Taylor v Chicago Bd of Educ  571.13; VIII,66—IX,123; 9 RRLR 414 (Ill FEPC 1964)
  • Henry v Coahoma Co Bd of Educ  571.14; VIII,66—XII,79; 246 FSupp 517 (ND Miss 1963), aff'd 353 F2d 648 (CA 5 1965), cd 384 US 962 (1966); ACLU
  • Ross v Taylor Township Bd of Educ  571.15; IX,32—XII,79
  • Rackley v School Dist No 5, Orangeburg Co  571.16; X,163—XIII,175; 258 FSupp 676 (DC SC 1966)
  • Moore v Bd of Educ (Pitt Co)  571.17; X,163—XIV,167; 272 FSupp 703 (ED NC 1967)
  • Franklin v Co School Bd of Giles Co  571.18; X,163—XIV,167; 242 FSupp 371 (WD Va 1965), rev'd 360 F2d 325 (CA 4 1966); MCLL
  • Ferguson v Bd of Educ (Kansas City)  571.19; X,163—XIII,175
  • Dean v Gray (Wagoner)  571.20; XI,55
  • Nettles v Romulus Township School Dist  571.21; XI,55—XIII,175; MCLL
  • Johnson v Branch (Halifax Co)  571.22; XI,56—XIII,175; 242 FSupp 721 (ED NC 1965), 364 F2d 177 (CA 4 1966), cd 385 US 1003 (1967)
  • Buford v Bd of Educ (Morganton)  571.23; XI,56; 244 FSupp 437 (WD NC 1965); MCLL
  • Chambers v Bd of Educ (Hendersonville)  571.24; XI,56—XIII,175; 245 FSupp 759 (WD NC 1965), 364 F2d 189 (CA 4 1966)
  • North Carolina Teachers Assn v Asheboro City Bd of Educ  571.25; XI,56—XIV,167; 11 RRLR 1832 (MD NC 1966), 393 F2d 736 (CA 4 1968)
  • Wall v Bd of Educ (Sanly Co)  571.26, 571.49; XI,56—XIII,176; 259 FSupp 238 (MD NC 1966), rev'd & rem 378 F2d 275 (CA 4 1967)
  • Missouri Commn on Human Rights v Rives C-2 School District (Dunklin Co)  571.27; XI,107; MCLL
  • In re Irene Sawyer (Oakland, Calif)  571.28; XI,107—XII,79
  • Smith & US v Morrilton, Ark Sch Dist  571.29; XI,107—XIII,176; 11 RRLR 799 (ED Ark 1965), rev'd & rem 365 F2d 770 (CA 8 1966)
  • Bd of Educ (Madison Township) v New Jersey Comm of Educ  571.39; V,101
  • Re Taylor Township School Bd  571.45; VI,77
  • Black v Ramey (Hale Co)  571.47; XII,79—XIII,176
  • Gibson v Bd of Educ (Rison)  571.48; XII,79—XIII,176
  • Williams v Sumter School Dist #2  571.50; XII,80; 255 FSupp 397 (DC SC 1966)
  • Palmetto Educ Assn v Bd of Educ (Clarendon Co)  571.51; XII,80—XIII,176
  • Fayne and US v Bd of Educ (Tipton Co)  571.52; XII,80—XIV,167
  • Rolfe v Bd of Educ (Lincoln Co)  571.53; XII,80—XIV,168; 282 FSupp 192 (ED Tenn 1966), aff'd 391 F2d 77 (CA 6 1968); MCLL
  • Dobbins v Bd of Educ (Decatur Co)  571.54; XII,80—XIII,176
  • Macklin v Bd of Ed (Houston Co)  571.55; XII,80
  • Harkless v Sweeny Ind Sch Dist  571.56; XII,80—XIV,168; 300 FSupp 794 (SD Tex 1969)
  • Bonner v Texas City Ind Sch Dist  571.57; XII,80—XIV,168; 305 FSupp 600 (SD Tex 1969)
  • Steward v Ind School Dist (Stanton)  571.58; XII,80—XIV,168
  • Walton v Nashville, Ark Special School Dist #1  571.60; XIII,177; 401 F2d 137 (CA 8 1968)
  • Tims v Bd of Educ (McNeil)  571.61; XIII,177
  • Fuller v Bd of Educ (Williamson Co)  571.62; XIII,177—XIV,168
  • Key v Romulus Township School Dist (Wayne Co)  571.63; XIII,177
  • Johnson v Bd of Educ (Albany)  571.64; XIII,177—XIV,168
  • Brown v Bd of Educ (Pulaski Co)  571.65; XIV,168; 1 RRLS 71 (ED Ark 1969)
  • Cunningham v Bd of Educ (Benton)  571.66; XIV,168; 1 RRLS 258 (ED Ark 1969)
  • McBeth and Hawthorne v Bd of Educ (DeValls Bluff)  571.67; XIV,168; 1 RRLS 115 (ED Ark 1969)
  • Braxton v Bd of Educ (Duval Co)  571.68; XIV,168; 12 RRLR 797 (MD Fla 1967), 303 FSupp 958 (MD Fla 1969)
  • Glover v Daniel (Pike Co)  571.69; XIV,168
  • Lewis v Chicago State College  571.70; XIV,168; 299 FSupp 1357 (ED Ill 1969)
  • Burns v Bd of Educ (Indianapolis)  571.71; XIV,169; 302 FSupp 309 (SD Ind 1969)
  • Porcelli v Titus (Newark)  571.72; XIV,169; I ACQ 28; 302 FSupp 726 (DC NJ 1969); MCLL
  • Collins v Isenhour (Statesville)  571.73; XIV,169
  • Williams v Kimbrough, Bd of Educ (Madison Parish)  571.74; XIV,169; 295 FSupp 578 (WD La 1969)
572. Racial Discrimination by Government Agencies
  • Re North Carolina State Employment Security Comm  (572.a), 571.61; VII,33
  • In re Estate of William Ragland v City of Detroit, (Dept of Water Supply)  (572.b); MCLL
  • Lesniak v FEPC  (572.c), 571.65; VII,125; 111 NW2d 790 (Mich Sup Ct 1961)
  • Admr of US Farm Programs  (572.d); X,163
  • Gaines v Davis  (572.1), 571.13; III,19—VIII,119
  • Johnson v Yeilding  (572.2), 571.27; IV,111; 100 S2d 29 (Ala Sup Ct 1958), 165 FSupp 76 (ND Ala 1958)
  • New York State Labor Dept v Fanelli  (572.3), 571.36; V,69
  • Detroit v FEPC  (572.4), 571.37; V,69—VII,98
  • Re South Carolina Employment Service  572.6, 571.50; VI,128—VIII,66
  • Highland Park v Michigan FEPC  (572.7), 571.37a; VII,64; 111 NW2d 797 (Mich Sup Ct 1961)
  • Pryor v Poirier  (572.8), 571.49; VI,128—VII,64; 6 RRLR 1098 (DC Kan 1961)
  • Chambers v Kenosha Co Dept of Public Welfare  572.9, 572.11; VIII,66—IX,32; MCLL
  • In the Matter of Investigation of New York City Dept of Commerce and Industrial Development  572.10; VIII,147; MCLL
  • Roberts v Millburn  572.11; IX,123—X,130
  • Folks v Coffeyville Police Dept  572.12; IX,123; 9 RRLR 413 (Kan Comm on Civ Rts 1964)
  • Bowers v Campbell  572.13; XI,56—XIII,177; MCLL
  • In re Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District  572.14; XI,107
  • Marshall v Ace Foods  572.15; XI,107; MCLL
  • Felder v Franklin Area School District and Dr C F Hirshey  572.16; XII,80—XIII,177; 12 RRLR 491 (Pa Human Relations Commn 1966); MCLL
  • Howard v Detroit Civil Service Commn  572.17; XII,80—XIII,177
  • Re Harding, Weddington, Bailey  572.18; XII,80—XIII,177
  • Anthony v Brooks  572.19; XIII,177—XIV,169; 1 RRLS 34 (ND Ga 1968); MCLL
  • Ogletree v McNamara  572.20; XIII,177
  • Re Siler (Dist of Columbia Commrs; Equal Employment Opportunity Office)  572.21; XIII,177—XIV,169
  • Re Davis (DC Equal Employment Opportunity Office)  572.22; XIII,177—XIV,169
  • Everett v Riverside Hose Co Inc (Tarrytown)  572.23; XIII,178; 261 FSupp 463 (SD NY 1966)
  • Williams v Civil Service Commn (Detroit)  572.24, 535.12; XII,75—XIII,178; MCLL; ACLU
  • Re Veneta King  572.25; XIII,178
  • US v Ohio Bureau of Employment Services  572.26; XIV,169; I ACQ 24; MCLL
  • US v Frazier  572.27; XIV,169; 297 FSupp 319 (MD Ala 1968)
573. Racial Discrimination Involving Government Contracts (Exec Order 10925) (and 556)
  • Re McCloskey Construction Co  (573.1), 571.31; V,43—VI,50
  • Re Westinghouse Electric Co  (573.2), 571.56; VII,33
  • Re General Electric Co, Shell Oil Co, Navy Shipyard (Charleston, SC), Schlitz Brewing Co, Waterboro Dress Mfg Co, and Youngswear Inc  (573.2a), 571.52; VII,33
  • Re Douglas Aircraft Co (Charlotte, NC), Western Electric Co (Nashville, Tenn)  (573.2b), 571.60; VII,33
  • Farmer v Philadelphia Electric  573.3; VIII,148—X,83; 329 F2d 3 (CA 3 1964)
  • Childs v Rockefeller  573.4; VIII,148—X,130
  • Gaynor v Rockefeller  573.4a; IX,32—XI,56; 256 NYS2d 584 (NY Ct of App 1965); MCLL
  • Waters v Paschen Contractors (Chicago)  573.5; X,84; 227 FSupp 659 (ND Ill 1964)
  • Re Tobacco Workers Intl Union, Local 208  573.6; XI,56; MCLL
  • NAACP v Bhd of Ry Car Men of America  573.7; XII,80—XIV,170; 265 FSupp 56 (ND Ala 1967), 406 F2d 399 (CA 5 1969)
  • Ethridge v Rhodes (Franklin Co)  573.8; XIII,178; 268 FSupp 83 (SD Ohio 1967); MCLL
  • Welch v Rhodes (Franklin Co)  573.8a; XIII,178
  • Re Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Co  573.9; XIII,178
  • Mann, Lassiter v Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Co  573.10; XIII,178—XIV,170; MCLL
574. Racial Discrimination by Transportation Companies
  • Jeanpierre v State Comm Against Discrimination  (574.1), 571.4; II,29—III,64; 162 NYS2d 506 (Sup Ct App Div 1957)
  • Thompson v Erie Railroad Co  (574.2), 571.5; II,48
  • Franklin v Trans World Airlines  (574.3), 571.8; II,82—III,43; 2 RRLR 867 (NY SCAD 1957)
  • Richardson v Texas and New Orleans RR Co  (574.4), 571.10; III,19,83; 242 F2d 230 (CA 5 1957)
  • Marshal v Central Ga Ry Co  (574.5), 571.11; III,19; 268 F2d 445 (CA 5 1959), cd 361 US 943 (1960)
  • Jones v American President Lines  (574.6), 571.12; III,19; 308 P2d 393
  • Re Checker Cab Co  (574.7), 571.14; III,19—VIII,66
  • Cooks v Bro of Ry Carmen, Locals 991 & 783, Texas and N Orleans RR Co  574.8; IV,64—X,163; 338 F2d 59 (CA 5 1964), cd 380 US 975 (1965)
  • Clark v Norfolk and Western Ry Co  (574.9), 571.22; IV,64
  • Colorado Anti-Discrimination Comm v Continental Airlines  574.10, 571.25; IV,65—X,130; 368 P2d 970 (Colo Sup Ct 1962), rev'd 372 US 714 (1963); MCLL
  • Banks v Capital Air Lines  (574.11), 571.28; IV,III—V,69; 5 RRLR 263 (NY SCAD 1960)
  • Butts v NY Central Ry System  (574.13), 571.43; VI,77—VII,32
  • Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry Co v California FEPC  (574.14), 571.46; VI,77—VII,125; 7 RRLR 164 (Los Angeles Co Super Ct 1962)
  • White v Northwest Airlines  574.15; VIII,67; MCLL
  • Baker v Bro Ry & Steamship Clerks, Louisville & Nashville RR  574.16; IX,32—XI,56; MCLL
  • Wilcox v Jacksonville Terminal Co  574.17; IX,32—X,84
  • US v Jacksonville Terminal Co  574.17a; XIV,170; MCLL
  • Nunn v Missouri Pacific RR Co  574.18; XI,108—XII,80; 248 FSupp 304 (ED Mo 1966); MCLL
  • Norman v Missouri Pacific RR  574.18a; XIV,170; 414 F2d 73 (CA 8 1969)
  • Allen v US (Mo Pacific RR)  (574.18b), 571.34; V,43; 173 FSupp 358 (Ct of Claims 1959), cd 361 US 882 (1959)
  • Johnson v Seabord Coast Line RR  574.19; XIII,178—XIV,170; 405 F2d 645 (CA 4 1968), cd 394 US 918 (1969)
  • Black v Central Motor Lines, Inc  574.20; XIII,178—XIV,170
  • Dent v St Louis-San Francisco Ry Co, Brhd of Railway Carmen of America  574.21; XIII,178—XIV,170; 265 FSupp 56 (ND Ala 1967), rev'd 406 F2d 399 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Glover v St Louis-San Francisco Railway Co  574.21a; XIV,171; 386 F2d 452 (CA 5 1967), 393 US 342 (1969)
  • In re Spears and Chicago Transit Authority  574.22; XIII,179; 12 RRLR 516 (Ill FEPC 1966); MCLL
  • Strong v Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination  574.23; XIII,179; 222 NE2d 885 (Mass Sup Jud Ct, Suffolk 1967)
  • Walker v Pilot Freight Carriers  574.24; XIII,179—XIV,171; 405 F2d 645 (CA 4 1968), cd 394 US 918 (1969)
  • Lee v Observer Transportation Corp  574.25; XIII,179—XIV,171; 405 F2d 887 (CA 4 1968), cd 394 US 918 (1969)
  • Brown v Frontier Airlines  574.26; XIV,171; 305 FSupp 827 (DC Colo 1969)
  • US v Associated Transport  574.27; XIV,171
  • US v Roadway Express  574.28, 547.28; XIV,171;MCLL
  • Jones v Lee Way Motor Freight  574.29; XIV,171; 300 FSupp 653 (WD Okla 1969)
  • US v TIME Freight Co, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 480  574.30; XIV,171; MCLL
575. Racial Discrimination by Unions, Trade Associations
  • Clark v Curtis  (575.a); MCLL
  • Graham v Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen  (575.b); 338 US 232 (1949); MCLL
  • Pacific Maritime Assn v Seafarers Int'l Union of North America  (575.c); MCLL
  • In re Local Union #2 of United Assn of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of US & Canada v Complainants Allman & Borges  (575.d); MCLL
  • Sells v Intl Bro of Firemen and Oilers  (575.e), 575.15, 571.59; VII,33—IX,70; 190 FSupp 857 (WD Pa 1961)
  • Re Plainfield Fireman's Mutual Benevolent Assn  (575.f), 571.63; VII,99
  • De Matas v Bldg Service Employees Int'l Union Local 32-B  (575.g), 571.67; VII,125; 6 RRLR 1208 (NY SCAD 1961)
  • Complaint against Esso Standard Oil, Bro of Teamsters, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers  (575.1), 650.2; I,29,48
  • Syres v Oil Workers Int'l Union, Local #23  (575.2), 650.1; I,29,85; rev'd 350 US 892 (1955)
  • Syres v Oil Workers Int'l Union, Local #23  (575.3), 571.23; IV,65,lll; rev'd 350 US 892 (1955)
  • Tunstall v Brotherhood  (575.4); 323 US 210 (1944)
  • Steele v Louisville and N R Co;  Steele v L & N R Co, (575.5); 323 US 192 (1944)
  • Brotherhood of RR Trainmen v Howard  (575.6); 343 US 768 (1952)
  • Ross v Bricklayers Union  (575.7), 571.6; II,48—III,87; 82 NW2d 315 (Wisc Sup Ct 1957)
  • Oliphant v Bro of Locomotive Firemen  (575.8), 571.9; II,82—V,43; 262 F2d 359 (CA 6 1958), cd 359 US 935 (1959)
  • Conley v Gibson, Bro of Ry and SS Clerks  (575.9), 571.15; III,44—VII,32; 355 US 41 (1957); 6 RRLR 818 (SD Tex 1961)
  • Whitfield v United Steelworkers of America  (575.10), 571.17; III,65,83; 263 F2d 546 (CA 5 1959), cd 360 US 902 (1959)
  • Butler v Celotex  (575.11), 571.19; IV,37; 3 RRLR 503 (ED La 1958)
  • Menifee v Local 74 Wood, Wire and Metal Lathers  (575.12), 571.20; IV,37
  • Re Gleason  (575.13), 571.29, 575.10; IV,lll—VIII,88
  • Liquor Salesmen's Union v NAACP  (575.14), 571.35; V,69—VII,32
  • Brandenberg v Metropolitan Package Store Assn  (575.15), 571.35a; VI,77—VII,64; 211 NYS2d 621 (NY Sup Ct 1961)
  • Jones v Distillery Workers Int'l Union  (575.16), 571.40; V,102
  • Re Int'l Assn of Machinists, Lodge 2016  (575.17), 571.48; VI,128
  • Howard v St Louis-San Francisco RR Co  575.18; VIII,67—XII,81; 244 FSupp 1008 (ED Mo 1965); MCLL
  • Randolph v Am Federation of Musicians  575.19; VIII,148—X,84
  • New York Commn for Human Rights v Farrell, (Local 28 Sheet Metal Workers)  575.20; VIII,145—XIII,179; 252 NYS2d 649 (NY Co Sup Ct 1964), 262 NYS2d 526 (NY Co Sup Ct 1965), 263 NYS2d 250 (NY Sup Ct 1965), 264 NYS2d 489 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1965), 277 NYS2d 287 (NY Sup Ct 1967), 278 NYS2d 982 (NY Sup Ct 1967); MCLL
  • Chisely and Smith v Joint Apprenticeship Comm, Sheet Metal Workers Local 122  575.20a; XIV,171
  • Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm v Bro of Painters, Decorators, and Paperhangers  575.21; VIII,148; MCLL
  • Stout v Construction & Genl Laborers Dist Council of Chicago  575.22; IX,123; 226 FSupp 673 (ND Ill 1963)
  • In re Housing and Local 387 Carpenters' Int'l Union  575.23; IX,124—XI,57; 10 RRLR 426 (NLRB 1964)
  • Todd v Jt Apprenticeship Comm, Steelworkers of Chicago  575.24; IX,124—XII,81; 223 FSupp 12 (ND Ill 1963), 332 F2d 243 (CA 7 1964), cd 380 US 914 (1965)
  • Delaney v Conway  575.25; IX,124—X,84; 241 NYS2d 384 (NY Co Sup Ct 1963)
  • New York State Comm for Human Rights on complaint of Mitchell v R & S Plumbing;  Local 373, United Assn of Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry, US and Canada (AFL-CIO), 575.26; IX,124; 243 NYS2d 61 (NY Spec Term 1963); MCLL
  • US v Plumbers Union Local 120 (Cleveland)  575.26a; XIV,172; MCLL
  • Turner v LA Sup Ct  575.28; X,84—XI,108; MCLL
  • NLRB v Local 12 United Rubber Workers of America  575.29; X,130—XIII,179; 150 NLRB 18 (1964), 368 F2D 12 (CA 5 1966), 63 LRRMan 2395, cd 389 US 837 (1967)
  • Local 51, Intl Assn Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers v Allison  575.30; X,130
  • Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd  575.31; X,164—XI,108; 148 NLRB 1402 (1964), 10 RRLR 1727 (CA 9 1965); MCLL
  • Ambox and Dist 7, Intl Assn of Machinists  575.32; X,164; 146 NLRB 1520 (1964)
  • Hamm Brewing Co, United Brewery Workers  575.33; X,164; 151 NLRB 397 (1965)
  • Archer Laundry Co v Laundry, Dry Cleaning Union  575.34; X,164; 150 NLRB 1427 (1965)
  • NLRB v Plumbers, Local 2  575.35; X,164—XIII,180; 62 LRRMan 2211 (CA 2 1966); MCLL
  • Re Intl Bhd of Electrical Workers  575.35a; XI,57
  • US v United Assn of Journeymen and Apprentices, Plumbing and Pipe-Fitting Industry of US and Canada;  Local 73 Plumbers Union (Indianapolis), 575.35b; XIV,172
  • NLRB v Local 1367, Int'l Longshoremen's Assn  575.36; X,164—XIV,172; 368 F2d 1010 (CA 5 1966), cd 389 US 837 (1967); MCLL
  • Boudreaux v Baton Rouge Marine Contracting; Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n  575.36a; XIV,172; 304 FSupp 240 (ED La 1969)
  • Re Southern Bell Telephone Co;  New Orleans Public Service; Sears Roebuck & Co; Maison-Blanche; Godchaux's; D H Holmes Co; Mark Isaacs Co, 575.37; XI,57
  • Re Darling & Co;  Int'l Chemical Workers; Bhd of Carpenters; Bhd of Electrical Workers; Operating Engineers, 575.37a; XI,57
  • Hendricks v Int'l Bhd of Locomotive Engineers  575.38; XI,57
  • Martin v Trenton and Mercer Co Bd of Realtors  575.39; XI,57
  • Morris v South Bend-Mishawaka Bd of Realtors  575.40; XI,57—XII,81; MCLL
  • Dominque v McKeithen, La State Bd of Embalmers and La Funeral Directors Assn  575.41; XI,57; MCLL
  • Teamsters Local No 695 v East Gibes Distributing  575.42; XI,108
  • US v Building and Construction Trades Council of St Louis  575.43; XI,108—XIII,180; 271 FSupp 447 (DC Mo 1966); MCLL
  • In re Dr Vincent Conigliaro  575.44, 576.32; XI,108
  • Ford, Cain v US Steel Corp, United Steel-workers of America, AFL-CIO  575.45; XIII, 180; MCLL
  • McKinstry v US Steel Corp; Hardy v US Steel Corp, United Steelworkers of America  575.46; XIII,180—XIV,172; 289 FSupp 200 (ND Ala 1967)
  • US v H K Porter Co; United Steelworkers Local 2250  575.46a; XIII,178—XIV,172; I ACQ 52; 296 FSupp 40 (ND Ala 1968); MCLL
  • Muldrow v H K Porter  575.47; XIII,180; 406 F2d 399 (CA 5 1969)
  • NLRB v Bush Hog Inc (Teamsters Local 612—Selma)  575.49; XIII,180—XIV,172; 161 NLRB 1136 (1966), 405 F2d 755 (CA 5 1968)
  • Cleveland v Packinghouse and Warehousemen Local 629, Int'l Bhd of Teamsters  575.49a; XIV,172; II ACQ 15; MCLL
  • Re Viking Bag Division, Shurfine-Central Corp and Int'l Brotherhood of Pulp Workers  575.50; XIII,180; 161 NLRB 51 (1966)
  • Dykes v Monsanto Chem, Atomic Workers Union  575.51; XIII,181—XIV,172
  • US v Sinclair Refining Co; Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local 4-227 (Houston)  575.51a; XIV,172; MCLL
  • In re Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local #12, Hoisting & Portable Building Trades, AFL-CIO  575.52; XIII,181; MCLL
  • Harris v IUOE; Operating Engineers AFL-CIO Local 12 v California Fair Employment Practices Comm (Los Angeles)  575.52a; XIV,172; 12 RRLR 1697 (Calif FEPC 1967), 81 CR 47 (Calif DCA 1969)
  • Banks v Georgia Lodge #45  575.53; XIII,181
  • Local #234 of Wood Wire Metal Lathers and Jackson v Acousti Engineering Co  575.54; XIII,181—XIV,172
  • US v Wood, Wire, Metal Lathers Int'l Union Local 46  575.54a; XIV,173
  • Vogler v McCarty, Inc; US v Int'l Assn of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers Local 53  575.55; XIII,181—XIV,173; 294 FSupp 368 (ED La 1967), 407 F2d 1047 (CA 5 1969)
  • Jackson v Speech Assn of America  575.56; XIII,181
  • Robinson v P Lorillard Co and Tobacco Workers Intl Union, AFL-CIO and Local 317  575.57; XIII,181—XIV,173; MCLL
  • Briggs v Philip Morris, Tobacco Workers Local 209  575.58; XIII,181
  • US v Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local #683  575.59; XIII,182; MCLL
  • US v IBEW, Local #38, Electrical Joint Apprenticeship, Training Program (Cleveland)  575.60; XIII,182—XIV,173
  • US v IBEW, Local #212 (Cincinnati)  575.61; XIII,182—XIV,173; 292 FSupp 413 (SD Ohio 1968)
  • US v Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Assn Local 36; Int'l Bhd Electrical Workers Local 1 (Missouri)  575.61a; XIV,173; 416 F2d 123 (CA 8 1969)
  • Int'l Bhd of Elec Workers Local 5 v EEOC  575.61b; XIV,173; 398 F2d 248 (CA 3 1968), 393 US 1021 (1969)
  • US v Int'l Bhd of Electrical Workers Local 357 (Las Vegas)  575.61c; XIV,174; MCLL
  • Dobbins, US v Local 212, Int'l Bhd of Elec Workers  575.61d; XIV,174; 292 FSupp 413 (SD Ohio 1968)
  • Lavelle v Greater Pittsburgh Multilist Inc  575.62; XIII,182
  • Alexander v Avco Corp, Aero Lodge #735 of Int'l Machinists AFL-CIO  575.63; XIII,182
  • Hyler v Reynolds Metals  575.64; XIII,182
  • New Rochelle Human Rights Commn v Electrical Workers Local 501  575.65; XIII,182
  • US v Steamfitters Local 250 (Los Angeles)  575.66; XIV,174; MCLL
  • US v Manor Baking Co; American Bakery and Confectioners Int'l Union Local 111 (Dallas)  575.67; XIV,174; MCLL
  • US v United Papermakers and Paperworkers Local 189; Crown-Zellerbach Corp  575.68; XIV,174; 301 FSupp 906 (ED La 1969), 1 RRLS 219 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • US v Int'l Assn of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Local 1 (Chicago)  575.69; XIV,174; MCLL
  • US v Int'l Assn of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Local 377 (San Francisco)  575.69a; XIV,174; MCLL
  • US v Hayes Int'l Corp; United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 1115 (Birmingham)  575.70; XIV,174; 295 FSupp 803 (ND Ala 1969), 415 F2d 1038 (CA 5 1969); MCLL
  • Retana v Apartment, Motel, Hotel, and Elevator Operators Union, Local 14 (San Francisco)  575.71; XIV,174; MCLL
  • The Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v Schultz  575.72; II ACQ 42; MCLL
576. Other Racial and Religious Discrimination
  • Re Treskunoff (San Francisco)  (576.a), 572.12; XI,56
  • Glover v Brennan's Cafe  (576.b), 571.54; VII,33,164
  • Wilton Co v California FEPC ex rel Ramsey  (576.c), 571.55; VII,33,99
  • Rolter v Harding-William Eastern Corp  (576.d), 571.57; VII,33
  • Bell v American Smelting and Refining Co  (576.e), 571.64; VII,125; 7 RRLR 158 (Super Ct Pierce Co 1962)
  • St Paul v Woolworth Co  (576.1), 571.7; II,64; MCLL
  • Goshorn v Bar Assn of DC  (576.2), 571.6; III, 44; 152 FSupp 300 (DC DC 1957)
  • In re Application of Charles E Williams  (576.3), 571.16a; IV,37
  • Brown v Carter  (576.4), 571.26; IV,85
  • American Jewish Congress v Carter  576.5, 571.30; IV,111—VIII,67; 190 NYS2d 218 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1959), 5 RRLR 426 (NY Sup Ct App Div 1960), 173 NE2d 788 (NY Ct of App 1961)
  • Re Marketime Drugs  (576.6), 571.33; V,43; 5 RRLR 917 (Wash St Bd Against Discrimination 1960)
  • Temmelman v Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp  (576.7), 571.42; VI,77
  • Arnett v Seattle Gen'l Hospital  (576.8), 571.44; VI,77—VII,32; 6 RRLR 338 (Wash State Bd Against Discrimination 1960)
  • Pl v Resp (Michigan Fair Employment Practices Comm)  (576.9), 571.51; VII,32
  • Guy F Atkinson Co v McNeil  576.10, 571.53; VII,33—VIII,148
  • Contra Costa Realty Bd v FEPC  576.11; VIII,88,148
  • Lombardo, Mullally v Queens College  576.12; VIII,88—IX,71; 13 App Div 2d 1097 (NY App Div 1963)
  • New York Bd of Higher Educ v Carter  576.12a; X,84; 250 NYS2d 33 (NY Ct of App 1964)
  • Calhoun v General Motors  576.13; VIII,88—X,85; MCLL
  • Cohen v River Rouge Savings Bank  576.14; IX,32
  • Re Black  576.15; IX,33
  • St Paul FEPC ex rel White v Midwest Bldg Services  576.16; IX,124—X,85; 9 RRLR 385 (St Paul FEPC 1964)
  • May v Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co  576.17; IX,124; MCLL
  • Lefkowitz v Universal Atlas Cement Div of US Steel Corp  576.18; IX,124; MCLL
  • Re Ind Metal Workers Union, Locals 1 & 2, Hughes Tool Co, and United Steelworkers  576.19; X,85—XI,57; 147 NLRB #166 (1964)
  • Comm on Civil Rights v Scoville Co  576.20; X,85,164; 9 RRLR 1013 (Conn Civil Rights Commn 1964), 215 A2d 130 (Conn Sup Ct 1965)
  • Hylton v Amer Cable and Radio  576.21; X,131
  • Myart and Illinois FEPC v Motorola  576.22; X,130—XIII,182; 215 NE2d 286 (Ill Sup Ct 1966); MCLL
  • New York v Employment Associates  576.23; X,131
  • Midwest Employers Council v Omaha  576.25; X,164; 131 NW2d 609 (Neb Sup Ct 1964)
  • Centennial Laundry Co v West Side Organization  576.26; XI,57—XIII,182; 204 NE2d 589 (Ill App Ct 1965), aff'd 215 NE2d 443 (Sup Ct Ill 1966)
  • Birnbaum v Trussell  576.27; XI,57—XIII,182; 347 F2d 86 (CA 2 1965), 371 F2d 672 (CA 2 1966)
  • Brinkley v A & P  576.28; XI,57—XII,81; MCLL
  • Chandler v Greenville Mills  576.29; XI,57—XIII,182
  • Stokes v Allen Industries  576.30; XI,109
  • In re Shaw, Lois Jackson  576.31; XI,109
  • NAACP v Bell Laboratories  576.33; XI,109
  • Smith v Scotty Pen Co  576.34; XII,81
  • Steverson v Bell Telephone Laboratories  576.35; XII,81
  • Hicks v Crown Zellerbach  576.36; XII,81—XIV,174; 49 FRD 184 (ED La 1968)
  • Brandt v US Lines  576.37; XII,81; 246 FSupp 982 (SD NY 1966)
  • Pettway v American Cast Iron Pipe Co  576.38; XIII,183—XIV,175; 12 RRLR 899 (ND Ala 1967), 406 F2d 399 (CA 5 1969), 411 F2d 998 (CA 5 1969)
  • NAACP v GM (Fremont)  576.39; XIII,183
  • Reese v Atlantic Steel  576.40; XIII,183—XIV,175; 282 FSupp 905 (ND Ga 1967); MCLL
  • Anderson v Thierica, Inc (Grand Rapids)  576.41; XIII,183
  • Marlowe v General Motors Corp  576.42; XIII,183
  • Moody v Albermarle Paper Co  576.43; XIII,183—XIV,175; MCLL
  • US v Dillon Supply Co (Raleigh)  576.44; XIII,183—XIV,175; MCLL
  • The Observer Transportation Company v Daniel Lee  576.45; XIII,183—XIV,175; 405 F2d 887 (CA 4 1969), cd 394 US 918 (1969)
  • Clark v Central Blood Bank of Pittsburgh  576.46; XIII,183
  • US v H K Porter Co, Inc (Birmingham)  (576.46a), 573.11; XIII,178; I ACQ 52; 296 FSupp 40 (SD Ala 1968)
  • Hall v Werthan Bag Corp (Nashville)  576.48; XIII,183—XIV,175; 251 FSupp 184 (MD Tenn 1966); MCLL
  • Ceriles v Sturgis-Newport Business Forms  576.49; XIII,183
  • Rowe v General Motors Corp  576.50; XIII,184
  • Clark v American Marine Corp  576.51; XIII,184—XIV,175; 297 FSupp 1305 (ED La 1969), 304 FSupp 603 (ED La 1969)
  • Griggs v Duke Power Co  576.52; XIII,184—XIV,175; 292 FSupp 243 (MD NC 1968)
  • Lea v Cone Mills Corp  576.53; XIII,184—XIV,175; 301 FSupp 97 (MD NC 1969)
  • US v Cannon Mills (Kannapolis)  576.54; XIV,176
  • US v Kayby Mills  576.55; XIV,176
  • US v Bethlehem Steel Corp  576.56; XIV,176
  • US v Southern Weaving  576.57; XIV,176
  • HEW v South Carolina Medical College Hospital (Charleston)  576.58; XIV,176
  • US v Metro Personnel System  576.59; XIV,176
  • US v Parke Davis Co  576.60; XIV,176
  • Burney v North American Rockwell  576.61; XIV,176
  • In the Matter of H L Meyer Company; Teamsters Local 838  576.62; XIV,176; 177 NLRB 75 (1969)
  • United Packinghouse, Food and Allied Workers Int'l Union v NLRB; Farmers Co-operative Compress v NLRB  576.63; XIV,176
  • Miller v Internat'l Paper Co  576.64; XIV,176; 290 FSupp 401 (SD Miss 1967), 408 F2d 283 (CA 5 1969)
  • Banks v Lockheed-Georgia Co; Local 709 IAMAW  576.64; XIV,176; 46 FRD 442 (ND Ga 1968)
  • McQueen v EMC Plastic Company  576.64; XIV,176; 302 FSupp 881 (ED Tex 1969)
  • King v Georgia Power; Local 84 IBEW  576.64; XIV,176; 1 RRLS 120 (ND Ga 1968)
  • Georgia Power Co v EEOC  576.64; XIV,176; 295 FSupp 950 (ND Ga 1968)
  • Everett v Trans-World Airlines  576.64; XIV,176; 298 FSupp 1099 (WD Mo 1969)
  • Colbert v H-K Corp  576.64; XIV,176; 295 FSupp 1091 (ND Ga 1968)
  • Vigil v American Telephone and Telegraph  576.65; XIV,176; 305 FSupp 44 (DC Colo 1969)
  • Hightower v Talon  576.66; XIV,177
  • Madlock v Sardis Luggage Co; Madlock v US Industries  576.68; XIV,177; 1 RRLS 211 (ND Miss 1969)
  • Jenkins v United Gas Corp  576.69, 576.47; XIII,183—XIV,177; 261 FSupp 762 (ED Tex 1967), rev'd 400 F2d 28 (CA 5 1968)
  • Carr v Monroe Mfg, Mississippi Employment Security Commn; Conoco Plastics, Intervenor  576.70; XIV,177; 295 FSupp 1281 (ED La 1968)
  • Harris v Orkin Exterminating Co  576.71; XIV,177; 293 FSupp 104 (ND Ga 1968)
  • Fears v Burris Manufacturing Co  576.72; XIV,177; 48 FRD 91 (ND Miss 1969)
  • Blue Bell Boots v EEOC  576.73; XIV,177; 295 FSupp 1060 (MD Tenn 1968)
  • Pullen v Otis Elevator Co  576.74; XIV,177; 292 FSupp 715 (ND Ga 1968)
  • John v Lake Co Bd of Supervisors  576.75; XIV,177; MCLL
  • Dewey v Reynolds Metals Co  576.76; XIV,177; 291 FSupp 786 (WD Mich 1968)
  • In re Haugabook, Wilkins  576.77; XIV,178
  • Desloges v Dept of Employment (California)  576.78; XIV,178; II ACQ 16; MCLL
  • Davis v Chase Manhattan Bank  576.79; XIV,178
  • US v Caldwell Furniture (Asheville)  576.80; XIV,178
  • Burrell v Peoples Community Hospital Auth  576.81; XIV,178
  • Retail Store Employees Union Local #428 v Lucky Stores  576.83; II ACQ 28
577. Nationality Discrimination
  • Sheets v Metropolitan Transit Authority of Los Angeles  (577.a), 577.1, 573.1; VII,33—VIII,88
  • Coppock v Credit Bureau of Albequerque  (577.1), 571.41; VI,50—VII,32; 6 RRLR 335 (NM FEPC 1961)
  • Franco v Denver  577.2; XIII,184; 12 RRLR 499 (Colo Civil Rights Commn 1967)
  • Gillis v Hern  577.3; XIV,178
  • Cinquino v Chicago Bd of Educ  577.4; XIV,178
  • Jalil v Hampton  577.5; II ACQ 24; MCLL
578. Sex Discrimination
  • Shpritzer v Civil Service Comm  (578.a), 578.3, 572.3; VII,33—VIII,120; ACLU
  • Beary v Queens Co Bar Assn  578.1, 572.1; V,102—IX,71; 209 NYS2d 893 (Queens Co Spec Term 1960)
  • Freeman v Bank of America  (578.2), 572.2; VI,78
  • NLRB v Montgomery Ward  578.3; XI,109; 156 NLRB #5 (1965)
  • Kuper v Comm'r of Internal Revenue  578.5; XI,109; 332 F2d 562 (CA 3), cd 379 US 920 (1964); MCLL
  • Lockhart v San Francisco  578.6; XII,81—XIII,184; MCLL
  • Air Transport Assn v Hernandez  578.7; XIII,184; 264 FSupp 227 (DC DC 1967)
  • Mayfield v American Airlines  578.8; XIII,184
  • Wells v Philadelphia Civil Service Commn  578.9; XIII,184; 225 A2d 554 (Pa Sup Ct), 386 US 1035 (1967)
  • Wirtz v Wheaton Glass Co  578.10; XIV,179; 284 FSupp 23 (DC NJ 1968)
  • Stastny v Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co  578.11; XIV,179; 293 FSupp 574 (WD NC 1968)
  • Fore v Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co  578.11a; XIV,179; 293 FSupp 587 (WD NC 1966)
  • Sellers v Colgate-Palmolive Co; Int'l Chemical Workers Union Local 15  578.12; XIV,179; 416 F2d 711 (CA 7 1969); MCLL
  • Rosenfeld v Southern Pacific Co  578.13; XIV,179; 293 FSupp 1219 (CD Calif 1968); MCLL
  • John Reed, Betty Morris v State Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd  578.14; XIV,180
  • Rao v Auburn Gen'l Hospital (Washington)  578.15; XIV,180
  • Phillips v Martin Marietta Corp  578.16; XIV,180; 411 F2d 1 (CA 5 1969), 416 F2d 1257 (CA 5 1969)
  • Nat'l Maritime Union v Grace Lines, United States Lines, American Export Isbrandtsen Lines  578.17; XIV,180
  • Evans, Dziob v National Maritime Union; Moore McCormack Lines  578.18; XIV,180
  • Bebe D Merrill v Perlman's Shell Service (Troy)  578.19; XIV,180
  • Mengelkoch v Industrial Welfare Commn; North American Aviation (Los Angeles)  578.20; XIV,180; 284 FSupp 950, 956 (CD Calif 1968), 393 US 83 (1968)
  • Kusner v Md State Racing Commn  578.21; XIV,180; I ACQ 24; MCLL
  • Freeman v Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co  578.22; XIV,180; MCLL
  • Utility Workers Union of America AFL-CIO Local 246, Brunhilde L Blossfeld, David L Farrow v Southern California Edison  578.23; XIV,180; MCLL
  • American Newspaper Publishing Association v Alexander  578.24; XIV,181; 294 FSupp 1100 (DC DC 1968)
  • Dietrich v World Airways  578.25; XIV,181; I ACQ 28; MCLL
  • Edwards v North American Rockwell Corp  578.26; XIV,181; 291 FSupp 199 (CD Calif 1968)
579. Age and Other Discrimination
  • Compl v Utility Co  (579.1), 574.1; VII,99
  • Walker Co v Industrial Commn  579.2; X,85—XII,81; 135 NW2d 307 (Wisc Sup Ct 1965); MCLL
  • Re 44-yr old Woman  579.3; XI,58
  • Steeves v West Haven Bd of Educ  579.4; XI,109
  • Humphrey v Bloomfield Tnship Fire Dept  579.5; XII,82—XIII,184
  • Soots v American Airlines  579.6; XIV,181
  • Cruz v Bd of Educ (NYC)  579.7; XIV,181
580. CIVIL ACTIONS UNDER §1983 AND OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS (and 151, 304, 551-555, and 590)
  • Slaton v Chicago  (580.a), 696.1; I,49; 130 NE2d 205 (Ill App Ct 1955)
  • Tynes v Gogos  580.1; III,44—IV,85; 144 A2d 412 (DC Muni Ct of App 1958); MCLL
  • Simmons v Whitaker  580.2; IV,38; 252 F2d 224 (CA 5 1958)
  • Pettus v Schlet  580.3; IV,86—VII,125; MCLL
  • Murphy v West  580.4; V,19
  • Patterson v Smith  580.5; VIII,68—IX,71
  • Royal News v Schultz  580.6; VIII,68—IX,124; MCLL
  • Royal News Co v Olsen  580.6a; IX,125—X,85; MCLL
  • COFO v Rainey  580.7; IX,125—X,131; MCLL
  • In Matter of Petition of Henry Moses, Dennis, and King  580.8; IX,125; MCLL
  • Seymore v Catherwood  580.9; X,85,86
  • US v Clark  580.10; X,131—XI,58; 10 RRLR 568 (SD Ala 1965)
  • Gilmore v La Coste  580.11; XI,58
  • Bryant and Sisco v Donnell  580.12; XI,58; 239 FSupp 681 (WD Tenn 1965); MCLL
  • Joe Louis Milk Co v Hershey  580.13; XI,58
  • Miller v Hall  580.14; XI,58—XIII,185; MCLL
  • Smith v Ladner  580.15; XI,109; MCLL
  • Toomer v Crowe  580.16; XII,82
  • Bonds v Chicago Bd of Election Commrs  580.18; XIII,185
  • McSurely v Ratliff  580.19; XIII,185—XIV,181; 282 FSupp 848 (ED Ky 1967), 389 US 949 (1967); 398 F2d 817 (CA 6 1968), 390 US 412 (1968), 390 US 914 (1968); MCLL
  • Civil Rights Marchers and US v Philadelphia, Lewis, Bd of Aldermen, Latimer (Philadelphia, Miss)  580.21; XIII,185
  • White v White Knights of the KKK of Mississippi  580.22; XIV,182; I ACQ 28; MCLL
  • Seabrooks v Chicago  580.23; XIV,182; II ACQ 16; MCLL
  • Griffin v Breckinridge (Mississippi)  580.24; XIV,182; 410 F2d 817 (CA 5 1969)
  • Moore v Davenport (California)  580.25; XIV,182
  • Guido v Schenectady  580.26; XIV,182; I ACQ 31; 404 F2d 728 (CA 2), cd 395 US 962 (1969); MCLL
  • Caperci v Huntoon, Jr  580.27; XIV,182; 397 F2d 799 (CA 1 1968), cd 393 US 940 (1968)
  • US v Farrar  580.28; XIV,182; 414 F2d 936 (CA 5 1969)
  • US v Barrett  580.28a; XIV,182
590. CRIMINAL PROSECUTION UNDER CIVIL RIGHTS AND OTHER LAWS (and 151, 304, 580)
  • New York v Schurkman, McLinskey  (590.a), 576.24; X,131,164
  • US v Bowers, De Boxtel (Hattiesburg)  (590.b), 590.19; XI,58—XIII,186
  • US v Pavlenko  590.1; II,29
  • Atterbury v Ragen, Warden  590.2; II,64—III,19; 237 F2d 953 (CA 7), cd 353 US 964 (1957); ACLU
  • US v Henry  590.3; IV,38
  • US v Trunko  590.4; VII,34; 189 FSupp 959 (ED Ark 1960)
  • US v Jones  590.5; VIII,68—X,86
  • US v Mills, Filingame  590.6; X,131—XII,82
  • US v Hubbard  590.7; X,131,164
  • US v Thornton, Boudreaux  590.8; X,131
  • US v Belk  590.9; X,131
  • US v Price, Rainey  590.10; X,131—XIII,185; 10 RRLR 74 (SD Miss 1965), rev'd & rem 383 US 787 (1966); 12 RRLR 22 (SD Miss 1967); MCLL
  • Alabama v Hoggles, Cook  590.11; X,165
  • Alabama v Thomas, Eaton (Hayneville)  590.12; X,65—XIII,186
  • US v Eaton, Thomas, Wilkins (Liuzzo murder)  590.12a; XI,110—XIII,186; 376 F2d 552 (CA 5 1967), cd 389 US 964 (1967)
  • US v Guest  590.13; X,165—XIII,186; 246 FSupp 475 (MD Ga 1965), rev'd & rem 383 US 745 (1966)
  • Georgia v Sims, Myers  590.14; XI,58—XIII,186; 144 SE2d 103 (Ga Sup Ct)
  • Georgia v Sewell  590.15; XI,58
  • Georgia v McCall  590.16; XI,58
  • Alabama v Haynes  590.17; XI,58
  • Georgia v Hubbard, Buckhault  590.18; XI,58
  • Alabama v Coleman  590.19; XI,58—XII,82
  • US v Humphries  590.20; XI,110
  • US v Sessums  590.21; XI,110—XIII,186
  • US v Squires, Jolly  590.22; XI,110—XIII,186
  • US v Davis, Jones  590.23; XI,110—XIII,186; 12 RRLR 1025 (ED NC 1967)
  • US v Elder  590.24; XI,111—XII,82
  • US v Knight  590.25; XI,111—XIII,186
  • Mississippi v Todd  590.26; XII,82
  • Camden v Reeves (Camden)  590.27; XIII,186
  • US v Conner (Montgomery)  590.28; XIII,186
  • US v Attaway (Savannah)  590.29; XIII,187
  • Huey v Larson, Hough, Kracht (Chicago)  590.30; XIII,187
  • Mississippi v Cecil King (Fayette)  590.31; XIII,187
  • North Carolina v Dawson, Coleman  590.32; XIII,187
  • US v William Miller, Lloyd Vallee, John Miller, Henry Deemer (Gretna)  590.33; XIII,187
  • US v Lester  590.34; XIII,187; 363 F2d 68 (CA 6 1966), cd 385 US 1002 (1967)
  • US v Johnson  590.35; XIII,187—XIV,183; 269 FSupp 706 (ND Ga), 390 US 563 (1968)
  • US v Feise  590.36; XIV,183
  • US v Fine  590.37; XIV,183
  • US v LeConte (Paterson)  590.38; XIV,183
  • US v Simpson  590.39; XIV,183
  • US v Lewis  590.40; XIV,183
  • US v Gerth  590.41; XIV,183
  • US v Addy, Bellamy, Brown  590.42; XIV,183
600. SUITS INVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF AMERICAN INDIANS
601. Civil Actions Between Individuals and Tribes
  • Martinez v Southern Ute Tribe  601.1; IV,38; 273 F2d 731 (CA 10 1959), cd 363 US 847 (1960)
  • Maryland Casualty Co v Seminole Tribe of Florida  601.2; XII,82; 361 F2d 517 (CA 5 1966), cd 385 US 918 (1966)
602. Civil Actions Against Reservation Indians
  • Haile v Saunooke, Eastern Bank of Cherokee Indians and US  602.1; IV,38; 246 F2d 293 (CA 4 1957)
  • Vermillion v Spotted Elk  602.2; IV,38; 85 NW2d 432 (ND Sup Ct 1957)
  • Williams v Lee  602.3; IV,38,65; 319 P2d 998 (Ariz Sup Ct 1958), 358 US 217 (1959)
  • In re Colwash  602.4; VII,34,65; 356 P2d 994 (Wash Sup Ct 1960)
  • Washington v Superior Ct (Okanogan Co)  602.5; VII,34,65; 356 P2d 985 (Wash Sup Ct 1960)
  • Powless v New York State Tax Commr  (602.6), 604.11; XI,111—XII,83; 212 NE2d 445 (NY Ct of App 1965), cd 383 US 911 (1966)
603. Criminal Actions Against Reservation Indians
  • New Mexico v Begay  603.1; IV,38; 320 P2d 1017 (NM Sup Ct 1958)
  • Blackburn v Wyoming  603.2; VII,34,65; 357 P2d 174 (Wyo Sup Ct 1960)
  • Antelope v Wyoming  603.3; VII,34,65; 357 P2d 174 (Wyo Sup Ct 1960)
  • Seymour v Superintendent  603.4; VII,65—VIII,68; 368 US 351 (1962)
  • Colliflower v Garland  603.5; X,86—XI,58; 342 F2d 369 (CA 9 1965); ACLU
  • Oklahoma v Johnnie Chewie  603.6; XII,82—XIV,183
  • California v Barnes (Lake Co)  603.7; XIV,184; MCLL
  • Washington v Richard So Happy  603.8; XIV,184
  • Nevada v Smart (Winnemucca)  603.9; XIV,184
604. Actions Involving Property Rights
  • Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v US  (604.a); 120 FSupp 202 (Ct of Claims), aff'd 348 US 272 (1955)
  • Jones Stone Cut Co v New York  (604.b), 532.13; III,63; 166 NYS2d 742 (NY Ct of Claims 1957)
  • Putnam v US  (604.c), 532.14; III,63,86; 248 F2d 292 (CA 8 1957)
  • Andreas v Henderson  604.1; IV,38; 160 FSupp 252 (SD Calif 1958)
  • Ware v Beach  604.2; IV,38; 322 P2d 635 (Okla Sup Ct 1957)
  • Bowman v Udall  604.8; XI,111
  • Wolfin v Vinson d/b/a Konocti Rambler  604.17; XIII,188—XIV,184
  • Poafpybitty v Skelly Oil  604.23; XIII,188—XIV,184; 442 P2d 324 (Okla Sup Ct 1966), rev'd & rem 390 US 365 (1968)
  • Snohomish Co v Seattle Disposal Co  604.24; XIII,188; 425 P2d 22 (Wash Sup Ct), 389 US 925 (1967)
  • Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v US  604.25; XIV,184; 369 F2d 1001 (Ct of Claims), 390 US 468 (1968)
  • Rincon Band of Mission Indians, La Jolla Band of Mission Indians v Escondido Water Co, Secy of Interior, US Atty Gen'l, City of Escondido  604.26; XIV,185; MCLL
  • Rincon Band of Mission Indians v Barrett  604.26a; XIV,185; MCLL
  • US v Smith  604.27; XIV,185
  • Washington v Mills (Tacoma)  604.28; XIV,185
  • Resighini Rancheria v US  604.29; XIV,185
  • Hopkins (Dukes) v US  604.30; XIV,185; MCLL
  • Dry Creek Rancheria v Hickel  604.31; XIV,185; MCLL
  • Whiterock v Udall (as Sec'y of Interior)  604.32; XIV,185
  • Scholder v US  604.33; XIV,185; 298 FSupp 1282 (SD Calif 1969)
  • Manchester Band of Pomo Indians v US; v Zirpoli, J  604.34; XIV,186; cd 396 US 986 (1969)
  • In re Miller (California)  604.35; XIV,186; MCLL
  • Reyos v First Security Bank (Salt Lake City)  604.36; XIV,186
  • Rice Lake Band Comm v US  604.37; XIV,186
605. Condemnation of Land of Indian Reservations
  • Federal Power Comm v Tuscarora Indian Nation  605.1; IV,65—V,69; 164 FSupp 107 (WD NY), 257 F2d 885 (CA 2), 265 F2d 338 (CA 2), 362 US 99 (1960)
  • US v Seneca Nation  605.2; X,132—XI,58; 338 F2d 55 (CA 2 1964)
  • Ottawa-Chippewa Tribe of Michigan v US  605.3; XIV,186
606. Cases on Termination
  • Crain v First National Bank of Oregon, Portland  (606.a), 604.6; IX,125; 324 F2d 532 (CA 9 1963)
  • Menominees v US  (606.b), 604.22; XIII,188—XIV,184; 388 F2d 998 (Ct of Claims 1967), aff'd 391 US 404 (1968)
  • United Tribes of Mendocino Co v Bureau of Indian Affairs  606.1; XIV,186; I ACQ 48; MCLL
607. Treaty Violations, Suits Against Government Agencies
  • Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v US  (607.a), 604.3; IV,111; 165 FSupp 139 (US Ct of Claims 1958)
  • Organized Village of Kake v Egan  (607.b), 604.4; VII,99; 369 US 60 (1962)
  • Kautz v Wash Dept of Game; Puyallup Tribe v Dept of Game of Washington  (607.c), 640.14, 604.5; IX,71—XIV,184; 422 P2d 771 (Wash Sup Ct 1968), 391 US 392 (1968)
  • Warren Trading Post v Arizona Tax Commr  (607.d), 602.6; X,132—XII,82; 387 P2d 809 (Ariz Sup Ct 1964), rev'd 380 US 685 (1965); MCLL
  • Littell v Udall  (607.e), 602.7; XI,111—XIII,187; 242 FSupp 635 (DC DC 1965), vac 366 F2d 668 (CA DC 1966), cd 385 US 1007 (1967)
  • Re Haidas Tribe  (607.f), 604.7; XI,111—XII,82
  • Re Taos Indians  (607.g), 604.9; XI,111
  • Washington v Gregory and Gregory (Olympia)  (607.h), 604.10; XI,111—XIII,188
  • Washington v J McCloud  (607.i), 604.10a, 604.13; XII,83—XIV,184; I ACQ 28
  • Washington v Moses  (607.j), 604.12; XII,83
  • Washington v Edith McCloud  (607.k), 604.13; XII,83—XIV,184; I ACQ 28; MCLL
  • Daney v US  (607.m), 604.15; XII,83; 247 FSupp 533 (DC Kan 1965), 370 F2d 791 (CA 10 1966)
  • Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v US  (607.n), 604.16; XII,83; 175 Ct Cl 451, cd 385 US 921 (1966), 401 F2d 785 (Ct of Claims), 393 US 1055 (1969)
  • Seminoles v US  (607.o), 604.18; XIII,188
  • Pierce v State Tax Commn (Onondaga Co)  (607.p), 604.19; XIII,188; 274 NYS2d 959 (NY Sup Ct 1966)
  • US v Sac and Fox  (607.q), 604.20; XIII,188; 383 F2d 991 (Ct of Claims), 389 US 900 (1967)
  • Rundle v Udall  (607.r), 604.21; XIII,188; 379 F2d 112 (CA DC 1967), cd 389 US 845 (1967)
  • John "Rolling Thunder" Pope v US  607.1; XIV,186
  • Campbell v Hickel  607.2; XIV,186; II ACQ 16; MCLL
  • Osuna v Johnstone  607.3; XIV,186; MCLL
608. Discrimination by Government, Private Agencies
  • Calif Indian Educ Assn v State Advisory Commn on Indian Affairs  608.1; XIV,186
  • Sulphur Bank Rancheria v Lake County Fair  608.2; XIV,187